‘Edge of Seventeen’

Edge of Seventeen.

Ohio Player

A boy’s coming out in Sandusky

By

IT’S 1984 on the coast of Ohio. Eric (Chris Stafford), who lives in the Lake Erie resort town of Sandusky, has just completed his junior year in high school. Stafford, the star of David Moreton’s film Edge of Seventeen, is cute and gawky, a less frantic version of Jim Carrey.

Eric is still a kid, cruising around in his parents’ Country Squire; he’s still under the care of his mother (warmly played by Stephanie McVay), who still packs baloney-and-white-bread sandwiches for her son. Over the summer Eric works with his sort-of girlfriend, Maggie (Tina Holmes), in a cafeteria. There he meets two people who change him. One is the wait-staff manager (Lea DeLaria, as the friendliest butch dyke in cinema history). The other is Rod (Andersen Gabrych), good-looking and openly gay. During the summer and the year that follow, Eric begins to realize that he likes boys. (He thought it was just that he liked David Bowie.)

Edge of Seventeen champions Eric’s struggle to find himself, but it also points out the ways Eric has to lie to himself and his family. And the boy’s treatment of Maggie demonstrates the true blundering cruelty of youth.

But the film is comic. As a former dish-monkey in a restaurant, I’ve waited forever to see a movie scene of the kitchen staff sucking the nitrous oxide out of the whipped cream cans in the walk-in refrigerator. (Nothing like a laughing-gas break to take the sting out of a 10-hour shift.) The film is soaked in the ambiance of a hot Midwestern summer–in everything from a sexy, drunken party during a sweltering night to the vintage disco soundtrack assembled by Tom Bailey (one half of the Thompson Twins). The suitably awkward sex scenes seem real and funny.

Best of all is Holmes, superb in the difficult part of Maggie, a girl who keeps hoping, hopelessly, that she can turn Eric straight. The role of the sad, scorned woman is the worst part in any picture, and the part is doubly jinxed in a picture about a gay man. (Unless, of course, you can just turn it into raving farce, as Joan Cusack did in In and Out.) Holmes shows her pain like an iceberg: most of it is under the surface. She may well be a big star someday.

Edge of Seventeen comes with the traditional finale of a homosexual coming-(out)-of-age movie, a dance party in a gay bar. But earlier, we saw that bar at 2 a.m., with the patrons–formerly so suave and insouciant–slumping, muttering under that miserable blaze of closing-time light. (The sight is almost enough to scare Eric straight.) The ending is also shadowed by the memory of the last mute, despairing look Maggie gave Eric. In moments like these, Edge of Seventeen transcends the commonplace.

Edge of Seventeen opens Friday, Jan. 28, at the Rialto Cinemas Lakeside, 551 Summerfield Road, Santa Rosa. For more information, see Movie Times, page 44, or call 539-9770.

From the January 27-February 2, 2000 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Himalayan Chhahari

0

x

Mountain menu: Fans of Nepalese cuisine have something to rave about with the advent of Himalayan Chhahari in downtown Santa Rosa. Pictured are chef/owner Raju Mothe, Yagya Shrestha, and Sujana Shrestha.

Taste Trek

Savor the exotic at Himalayan Chhahari

By Paula Harris

THERE’S NOTHING like traveling to foreign parts vicariously through the simple act of eating at ethnic restaurants, where a mere menu can become your passport to exotic sights, textures, aromas, and flavors.

While I was growing up in London in the 1970s, the United States was considered the coolest place on earth and American food was the most exotic of all. The high school kids in my class took to wearing jeans, sneakers, and T-shirts emblazoned with that annoying swirly red Coca-Cola motif. They snapped bubble gum and devoured American Graffiti at the cinema.

A new place opened up in my residential London neighborhood–a real American restaurant! The first we’d ever seen. It was a glitzy place called W.C. Fields, and the walls were covered with photos of the drawling comedian.

Every Thursday night, my friends and I would frequent this combination burger joint/deli/soda fountain. We’d dine on novel items like crispy potato skins, Buffalo wings, chili-cheese burgers, and strawberry shortcake. We’d dream we were in L.A. or the Big Apple.

Of course, now that I’ve lived in the states for many years–those items have lost their mysterious allure. But I’m constantly on the lookout for other unusual eateries that can take those trusty old taste buds on tour.

When Himalayan Sherpa Cuisine, a small, no-frills eatery opened on the outskirts of Glen Ellen a couple of years ago, the place really satisfied this culinary wanderlust. The scene featured Himalayan posters and artifacts, haunting bell-like music, and hearty dishes bursting with unusual flavors. When the Sherpa owners brought us steaming cups of fortifying milky chai tea–redolent with cardamom, cloves, and fresh ginger, on a freezing day after a long hike in Jack London Park one afternoon–we closed our eyes, inhaled the scents, and imagined we’d successfully reached Base Camp.

The Sherpa place closed last year, but our addiction to the colorful diverse Nepali cuisine, which uses tantalizing flavorings like cumin, cardamom, green, and red chilies, garlic, ginger, fenugreek, Szechwan peppers, and scallions, was as strong as ever.

A Santa Rosa restaurant called Katmandu Kitchen opened about the same time as Himalayan Sherpa Cuisine and featured Indian and Nepali cooking, but never reached the culinary level of the Himalayan Sherpa Cuisine restaurant.

Now, that too, has closed and a new Nepali restaurant has been born in its location.

Photo by Michael Amsler

Himalayan Chhahari is a casual, comfortable place with friendly service. A new carpet, fabric-covered archways, and red-painted wall trim give a warm effect. There are posters of Nepal on the walls, and sitar music plays softly on the sound system. Diners can be seated either at regular tables or (more interestingly) on the floor, sans shoes.

The wine list is minimal and not properly described on the menu, so stick to imported Indian beers, like Kingfisher or Taj Majal ($3).

Appetizers include momo ($4.25), steamed dumplings stuffed with ground chicken and herbs served with tomato pickle. Although these are pretty good, we’d like to see a vegetarian version also on the menu, such as the tasty spinach-cabbage momo served at the defunct Sherpa place.

The alu chap ($3), deep-fried mashed potato with chopped onion and cilantro served with sweet-and-sour tamarind sauce is a mouthwatering appetizer that smells as good as it tastes.

We sampled an array of curries: mixed vegetable curry ($7.50), including carrots, green beans, and broccoli; chicken curry ($8.95) with onion gravy, tomato and ginger; and fish curry ($11.95), described as red snapper cooked in a rich curry sauce, but actually large chunks of moist salmon.

But all the curries were too tame. For example, the fish curry would have been more exciting livened up with some ginger, whole spices, and scallions.

The chana ko dal ($6.95), a dish of garbanzo beans cooked in olive oil with fresh minced ginger and garlic, which has a souplike consistency, is very satisfying and flavorful.

Another winner was the fantastic garlic nan bread ($1.75), fluffy pillows that are cooked in the tandoor oven and emerging dry and deliciously chewy.

For dessert, try the kulfi ($2.50), homemade Nepali-style ice cream with raisins. It has an unusual icy-custard texture. Or try the kheer ($2.95), a mildly sweet rice pudding with a slight rosewater flavor prepared with coconut, raisins, cashews, cinnamon, and cardamom.

THE LUNCH BUFFET is an unbeatable bargain. For $5.95, you can load your plate (as many times as you like) with smoky succulent tandoori chicken; steamed basmati rice; chicken curry; garbanzo beans; lentils with whole spices; cauliflower and potatoes cooked with tumeric; and red potato and yellow squash curry. Plus green salad, nan bread and an assortment of interesting condiments, including mango chutney, cucumber raita, hot green chili and mint sauce, and sweet-and-sour tamarind sauce.

And while the food in general tastes far less complex than the old Sherpa Cuisine restaurant, Himalayan Chhahari chef Rajul Mothey is so pleasant and accommodating, we’re sure he’ll spice up the dishes on request to send you on that culinary journey.

Himalayan Chhahari Address: 535 Ross St., Santa Rosa; 579-8471 Hours: Lunch, Sunday-Friday, noon to 2:30 p.m.; dinner, daily, 5 to 9:30 p.m. Food: Dishes from Nepal and India Service: Proficient Ambiance: Casual with table or floor seating Price: Inexpensive to moderate with bargain lunch buffet Wine list: Minimal selection Overall: 2 1/2 stars (out of 4), dinner; 3 stars, lunch

From the January 27-February 2, 2000 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Sonoma County Filmmakers

0

Blast from the past: Sonoma County filmmaker Abe Levy cradles the antique camera he used as a student. These days, Levy employs state-of-the-art digital technology to make his films.

Reel Deal

Local filmmakers shoot for the big time

By Daedalus Howell

“WE’RE READY for your close-up, Mr. Howell,” says Tomales-bred filmmaker Abe Levy, exhaling a plume of Parliament cigarette smoke into the cab of a rented moving truck. Inside, I’ve been incubating a hangover while the truck’s stick shift massages my spleen. It’s 7 a.m., and we’re parked near a jagged precipice in Angeles National Forest, about an hour’s ride from the movie-mad bustle of Southern California, or as Levy likes to say, Lo-Cal.

The arid park has loaned its Martian terrain to innumerable episodes of Star Trek, but on this muggy summer’s day in 1998, it’s standing in for a hillside in San Francisco, circa World War II. My old chum Levy is assistant director on director Scott King’s noir-esque cryptology thriller Treasure Island, which would go on to garner the Special Jury Award for Distinctive Vision at last year’s Sundance Film Festival.

Thanks to my pal, on this day I’m a bit-part actor–one of a couple of beat cops with nary a line between us, strapped into a vintage policeman’s uniform so uncomfortable that on the label below “Dry Clean Only” it says “M. de Sade” in Sharpie pen.

Two merciful takes later and I’m on a commuter flight back to SFO and a shuttle to Sonoma County. Levy, too, will eventually return to the county where he and a handful of other local filmmakers toil to bring their creative visions to the silver screen.

In the wake of the phenomenal success of last year’s The Blair Witch Project, independent filmmakers have more reason than ever to think big. But for every such runaway success story, there are hundreds of would-be directors struggling even to get their visions onto film, let alone into movie theaters.

Last September saw a sneak preview of Levy’s first feature, Max, 13, at Petaluma’s Phoenix Theatre. The film, a pastoral coming-of-age story about a teenage knock-about during the fateful summer before his first year of high school, was shot throughout Sonoma and Marin counties and seems to herald a new era in local filmmaking–locally grown, locally shown.

Though the 27-year-old Levy and his fellow Sonoma County filmmakers harbor loftier ambitions than local screenings, the fact remains that for most of them home is where the art is.

“I’m more akin to the artist next door to you painting landscapes than I am to a Hollywood director,” says Levy. “But it’s amazingly difficult to make films. Everything is against you, from the sun on down.”

Shot on Super 16mm film (a comparatively inexpensive wide-screen format popularized by director Mike Figgis’ Leaving Las Vegas) with a privately raised budget under $100,000, Max, 13′s principal photography was completed two years ago. The film then went through a grueling post-production period in which it was edited and scored before finally being previewed.

Mitch Altieri and Phil Flores, the duo behind Petaluma’s American White Horse Pictures, know that grind all too well. They’re in the midst of editing their first feature film, Longcut–a “ranch picture” chronicling the emotional journey of an 8-year-old girl left psychologically threadbare and mute after witnessing a brutal murder.

“Filmmaking is the ultimate challenge. It’s the worst, most horrible thing you can do to yourself,” says Flores. “It’s an endurance test.”

His partner Altieri concurs.

“It’s like self-mutilation,” Altieri says, and then wryly adds, “You’re a loser, a bum, and you have no money, but you insist on doing it.”

Camera Comrades

Alleviating some of the directors’ struggle is the support Sonoma County filmmakers offer by assisting on one another’s projects–a process many find mutually beneficial.

“I think it’s really important to work on other people’s films as well as one’s own. You really learn what and how other people are doing, which can help you in your own work,” says Levy, who has worked with most other local directors in an array of capacities, from director of photography to sound engineer.

Partners Altieri and Flores began their work as a film community of two in South San Francisco, but they happily expanded their contacts once they arrived in Sonoma County.

“Since the film industry is such a monster, it’s great to start off holding somebody’s hand,” Altieri says.

“Working with or without a partner is about the same as being an only child vs. having siblings–I’d imagine the pros and cons are the same,” Flores adds. “With a sibling, there’s someone who’s always there; you get their hand-me-downs and plenty of advice–but they’ll also put shit in your hair and plug your nose while you’re sleeping.”

Lee Cummings, a relative newcomer to the local scene (his upcoming short Imprint details a woman’s existential crisis while locked in a cell 15,000 feet underground), has enjoyed the local film community’s open embrace.

“I think it’s a lot better here than in Los Angeles,” says the 28-year-old Cummings. “I’ve been blessed to be surrounded by some amazing people. These filmmakers have been some of the most generous and outstanding people a person could be gifted to be with.”

“These guys don’t know the word stingy,” he continues. “They believe that success is built with an open hand and not a quick tongue behind someone’s back. Your success is theirs. Someone is going to make it, and we’re all riding coattails.”

Indeed, if local directors had a common ethos, it might read something like the Three Musketeers’ credo “All for one and one for all.”

“There’s no doubt that if any one of us got a gig we’d hire everyone else to be part of it,” Altieri says. “You kind of generate a miniature gang–like a Sonoma County film gang.”

Screen saver: Occidental filmmaker Max Reid cuts costs on his films by employing digital technology and computer editing.

Remote Control

Though e-mail, fax machines, Federal Express, and commuter flights help connect local filmmakers to the film industry at large, the fact remains that the art form is firmly based in Hollywood.

Veteran filmmaker Max Reid–who has made numerous films for television with such actors as Malcolm McDowell, Jason Priestly, and Kathleen Quinlan–doesn’t regret his move to Occidental from Los Angeles, though he admits that shooting in Sonoma County has its difficulties.

“You have to confront things that you normally wouldn’t have to confront. It’s a different environment,” says Reid, 55. “The advantages are basically that everyone is really open and you can work here with a lot more freedom than you can in Southern California. On the other hand, you have more difficulty finding people that are trained and experienced.”

Argentinean filmmaker Gustavo Mosquera R moved to Santa Rosa to be with his new family shortly after Moebius, his inventive foray into science fiction and political allegory set in the Buenos Aires subway system, swept up honors and critical acclaim internationally in 1997.

The move, however, has not been without its drawbacks.

“When working in Sonoma County rather than Argentina, I lose some things and gain others,” Mosquera says. “Basically, I lose all my connections with people in the industry, producers and the media in Argentina.”

The 40-year-old director–who is currently auditioning top-bill stars for a crime thriller he will direct for Hong Kong action maven John Woo’s production company–says the move has left him feeling a bit isolated.

“The first sensation is that you are away from everywhere–the most difficult thing is not being far from the nebula of Hollywood but being so far from all my old friends who helped me with my other films,” he says. “What I really like about being here, however, and being isolated in the hills, is the sense of a sort of paradise where I think much better and more long term about projects. I feel like I have more time to develop my ideas. This is my creative oasis.”

Indeed, many local directors, including Occidental’s Brian Smith, work in the county specifically for its rural charm.

“It’s the aesthetic. I especially love western Sonoma County,” says Smith, who is now in pre-production for his third feature, Dixie Blue Summer, a drama about a young woman dying of a brain tumor in a small Sonoma County town. “I’ve lived and worked here for six or seven years now, and have no interest or desire to move anywhere else.”

DV or Not DV?

A recent boon to independent and low-budget filmmakers is the advent of a new breed of digital video technology that allows for superior image quality and ease of interface with desktop editing systems that run on home computers. And it’s cheap–very cheap.

Consider that 40 minutes of digital videotape costs about $14. With processing, the same amount of Super 16mm film prices out at about $1,200 and 35mm film about $2,500. To transfer a 90-minute digital video feature to film print so it could show in theaters, however, runs the bill up to a daunting $50,000–a cost most independent DV filmmakers hope to defray by inking a distribution deal.

Levy joined the ranks of directors Spike Lee and Harmony Korine (director of the cult hit Gummo) last fall when he too began shooting his latest feature in the new medium.

It’s Alright Ma, I’m Only Trying (the working title is inspired by the Bob Dylan song “It’s Alright Ma, I’m Only Bleeding”) is about a 27 year-old emotionally retarded man who falls in love with a 15-year-old girl who is his intellectual and emotional superior.

Though Levy had scripted the film, the ease and low cost of digital video allowed his actors to improvise for long spates of time, something that would otherwise have been cost-prohibitive.

In a similar vein, Santa Rosa theater impresario Robert Pickett’s first film venture, A Divine Madness (a philosophical portrait of a community theater ensemble in the midst of a production of Anton Chekov’s The Cherry Orchard), probably would not have been possible without the inexpensive new technology.

Reid also changed his filmmaking M.O. to the digital format.

“It’s the only way to go unless your great aunt dies and leaves you $30 million,” Reid says with a laugh. “It cuts out a lot of the physical costs of feature filmmaking. My biggest cost on this last film was catering–more than half the budget, in fact.

“The real problem these days is coming up with a really good story,” says Reid, whose current project is a romantic comedy about a boy-genius time-traveler from the future who falls in love with 21st-century girl and is inspired by her ailing mother to clean up the environment.

“You can shoot a film for pennies and then it’s done,” says Reid. “Anyone can make a movie now. Digital video strips you down to basics–there aren’t any excuses anymore for not making a movie. I lot of people would say, ‘Oh, I can’t afford it,’ but the truth is you can afford it. You just have to confront the true obstacles of making a film, which is that one needs to be a real, competent artist.”

Indeed, the directors agree that ultimately it’s a film’s story that matters, not its production medium.

“What’s important is matching the story with the medium,” Mosquera says. “With The Blair Witch Project, for example, exposing the failures of the image was used to say, ‘This was made by three [people] in the forest.’ But I cannot imagine shooting Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon in digital video, for example. . . . As a director, it’s the story that should make you feel passion for the film.”

That passion, however, has to sustain the filmmakers through not only the laborious pre-production and post-production process but also the tedious, often humiliating self-marketing directors must endure when attempting to secure a deal.

Though a plethora of markets exist for independent filmmakers (including traditional theatrical distribution, cable television, video, or even the Internet), none are a sure bet, and competition is fierce.

Levy has just begun sending out tapes of Max, 13 to film festivals around the country. But he has no illusions about the odds of success. Getting accepted by festivals is tough enough when a director has a finished film, and even worse when he or she can offer only a rough cut.

“You hope for serendipity,” Levy says. “You hope that your film will be timely in some way that you didn’t expect, or that some influential person will say, ‘Hey, this is a good film.’ You have to be in the right place at the right time with the right film.”

Local Screening

Meet a local filmmaker and explore the growing connections between two of the world’s great religions on Friday and Saturday, Jan. 28 and 29, when the Sonoma Film Institute screens Jews and Buddhism: Belief Amended, Faith Revealed, a documentary co-directed by veteran Petaluma filmmaker Bill Chayes.

Some 30 percent of non-Asian-American Buddhists are Jews, and the two religions have developed a remarkable influence over each other’s practices in the United States. Chayes’ documentary, which is narrated by actress Sharon Stone, examines this phenomenon by combining interviews of believers with footage of dialogues between the Dalai Lama and Jewish scholars. Also included is archival footage of a televised encounter between David Ben Gurion and U Nu of Burma.

Chayes introduces Jews and Buddhism at 7 p.m. both days. The film will be followed by the documentary Delta Jews at 7:50 at the Darwin Theatre, Sonoma State University, 1801 E. Cotati Ave., Rohnert Park. Admission is $4. For details, call 664-2606.

From the January 27-February 2, 2000 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Martha’s

0

Vision quest: Martha Lopez lends a personal touch to the upscale Mexican cuisine at her popular west county establishment.

On Her Own

Sebastopol restaurateur Martha Lopez finds a place to play house

By Marina Wolf

CHEFING is a transient business. There’s always a better gig at the new place down the street, better pay in the next town over. Ask around, and you’ll be lucky to find a chef who’s been in the same place for three years, let alone 35, as Martha Lopez had at her family’s restaurant, the popular Old Mexico in Santa Rosa, before opening her own place, Martha’s, in Sebastopol.

Lopez is nonchalant about the three and a half decades she spent working and cooking with her family, at the restaurant that their parents opened in 1964, soon after they arrived in the county from Michoacan, Mexico. “I was raised to do this,” she says in a rare moment of relaxation on the green-covered patio behind the cozy new space on Main Street. “I had no other choice. It was my father’s choice,” she says with not a trace of bitterness. “I don’t know what else I might have done.

“I have always done this.”

Lopez’s longtime compliance with her family’s wishes might be startling to Anglo-Americans, who usually want to flee the nest long before it’s a legal possibility. But to Lopez it’s simply the sign of a close family and good household economics. There are six children in the family–“My father had a good source of labor,” says Lopez with a chuckle–and all of them are still working in the family restaurant.

All except Martha.

“They’re not too happy, none of them,” says Lopez with a small shrug. “Because when part of the family leaves, the right hand, you know . . . Because I was one of the oldest, I had more responsibilities. I think the boys will have to pick up some of the duties.”

The “boys,” as she calls her four brothers affectionately, are all in their 30s, and Lopez is confident that they’ll soon fill in the space left by her departure. “They saw what I did,” she explains, “as I saw what my father did.”

THAT STOVE-SIDE training provided Lopez with a well-rounded education, as far as these things go. Lopez’s father did some of everything in the kitchen, and loved it, both at home and in the restaurant. Of course, in Mexico both are often the same place. “There you cook everything in your house, set a table outside, and serve it out like you were at home,” she says.

While U.S. health codes prohibit that exact sort of homeliness, the Lopez family did manage to reproduce the same feel at Old Mexico. Everyone was there, all the time. Ever since she’d finished high school and cosmetology school, Lopez had worked like the rest of them: six days a week, 14 to 16 hours a day.

She doesn’t complain; it was just part of being in the family.

Lopez hasn’t seen her family much since Martha’s opened on Nov. 1; neither she nor her family has the time. The most she has to look forward to is the standard set of American family holidays: Christmas, Thanksgiving, Easter. The fact that she owns her own home in Santa Rosa makes the separation that much more complete. She has no husband, as her mother did, to take a shift at the restaurant’s stove, and no children to come home after school and help out in the kitchen.

BUT SOME TRADITIONS die hard. Lopez is still working with family: cousin Martha Lobato, who had worked at Old Mexico for 14 years, joined her elder cousin in the Sebastopol venture as hostess and server. Lopez and Lobato are also sharing a home, with Lobato’s two grown sons, who do sometimes come in to help on the weekends.

It reproduces the feel of her old family situation, in miniature.

Certainly the work environment has been downsized. “The first two weeks working in the kitchen, I was banging myself on the corners because I was not used to working in such a small place,” says Lopez. Small indeed: Martha’s will have maybe 17 tables during the summer, when the patio is open. There’s half that many now. Old Mexico, on the other hand, seats about 200 people, including those in the party room, for a total of 50 tables or more. “This is nothing; it’s like a playhouse for me.”

But at least the playhouse is all hers. “I like my independence,” Lopez says, folding her hands together firmly. “Working with the family, you have to go by Father’s rules, and have people tell you what to do, when you know what to do. Getting to decide for myself was the best thing about leaving.”

And it’s not just the sun-backed chairs and the arrangement of the condiments in the kitchen that Lopez can decide about. She’s got more latitude now to play with the ingredients, which she pulls from both her native Michoacan and her California home.

In a cuisine that, in this country, tends toward steam-table sameness, and in a city that already had one Mexican restaurant per thousand people, the young Martha’s restaurant is already serving regulars who appreciate the low price and freshness of Lopez’s approach.

“I’m not going to say my food is that different, but it has my own touch, in every plate.” She is particularly proud of her salad dressing, a creamy avocado sauce that she says came to her in a dream.

But still, after 35 years, why the sudden decision to strike out on her own? “Well, it was a challenge for me. After working for my family for 35 years, I kind of said, ‘I want something else.’ I’m 48 years old, so I had to do it while I still had the strength to do something like this on my own.”

From the January 27-February 2, 2000 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Rental Housing

0

No room at the inn: Maceo Campbell and Michal Pincus moved to the county five years ago in search of affordable housing. Instead, they found escalating rents and landlords who charged exorbitant rates for substandardshelter.

No Vacancy

Tight housing market makes local rentals a competitive game

By Janet Wells

FIVE YEARS AGO Michal Pincus and her partner, Maceo Campbell, were driven out of San Francisco by the high rents. The two headed for Sonoma County, which seemed like a perfect spot for artist Pincus and environmental activist Campbell. For $400 a month, they rented a funky trailer in Sebastopol, with a solarium and a tree growing through the roof.

The first big blow to the couple’s North Coast dreams came just a year later. It wasn’t that the trailer baked in the summer and the rain and wind came in through the leaky roof in the winter. Or that the trailer had only a small wood-burning stove for heat.

The kicker was cost.

Pincus suffers from chronic fatigue syndrome, but was unable to qualify for disabilzity benefits, and Campbell’s salary couldn’t cover the trailer rent. The two soon discovered that they were priced out of the market everywhere in the county. “We were basically homeless for a couple of years, on the couch-and-floor tour. We even lived in a tent for a while,” Pincus says.

When her disability claim came through last year, Pincus figured the two would be able to afford a studio cottage at the low end of the rent spectrum. Wrong.

“Right after I got approved, I looked in the paper and, man, the carrot got moved. It’s just gone up, up, up,” she laments. “The whole thing almost has become like a comic farce. I followed up on one place that was listed for $500. It was a converted chicken coop, with no insulation. They had a line of people coming to look at this place.”

What the two could afford was an attic room, with ceilings so low that both had to stoop to move around. The landlord, says Pincus, did them a favor by giving them a month’s free rent before starting to charge $300.

“We paid it because we had to. Part of me was so beaten down and so sick, and part of me was furious,” she says. “What makes people who have money better than me so it makes it OK for me to have to live this way?”

Going Up: Sonoma County Rents.

Caught Behind the 8 Ball: Local rental market a jungle for low-income tenants.

No Kidding: Audit reveals discrimination against children.

PINCUS’ STORY isn’t all that unusual, at least in Sonoma County. Just about everyone, it seems, has a housing nightmare to share. Eviction for no good reason. Rent hikes three, even four times in one year. Three people squeezing into one room to make ends meet. A hundred prospective renters showing up for an open house and engaging in a bidding war that drives rents even higher.

These days the notion of a cute little wine-country garden cottage for $500 is quaint, if not downright laughable.

The local economy is booming. The population is growing. The job market is beckoning. The real estate market is red-hot. But there’s a price to pay for success: Welcome to the stratospheric rental market.

Almost half of the county’s renters pay more than 30 percent of their income on rent, an amount that the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development deems “unaffordable,” resulting in tenants neglecting such necessities as medical insurance, clothing, and food.

The average rent for a studio in Sonoma County has gone up almost 13 percent in one year to $591 a month, according to RealFacts, a Novato-based company that analyzes real estate markets. A three-bedroom, two-bath apartment is going for an average of $1,227 monthly, an increase of more than 14 percent.

Vacancy rates are so low that it’s not unusual for landlords to get dozens of applications for a single apartment. One recent survey found only one vacancy in 1,118 apartment units in Petaluma, and only three vacancies in 2,298 units in Rohnert Park–approaching an almost unheard-of 0 percent vacancy rate. The overall vacancy rate in the county hovers around 2 percent. Affordable-housing advocates and real estate experts agree that a 5 percent vacancy rate is the watermark of a healthy market that benefits both renters and landlords.

“When the market is as tight as it is now, the market responds by increasing the price,” says Scott Gerber of Marcus & Millichap, a commercial real estate brokerage in San Francisco. “It’s not like landlords are trying to gouge people. There’s a long line of renters out there trying to rent. People are offering to pay more money.”

The good news, says Gerber, is that apartment construction is on the upswing. “If more housing is added, it will stabilize the rent and the vacancy rate will climb.”

Several hundred units of student housing are coming in Rohnert Park, which should relieve some of the demand for housing around Sonoma State University, Gerber says. And in Santa Rosa, city officials in 1998 approved permits for 600 units of housing.

“When vacancy rates are higher, people are not going to build apartments in that market, because it decreases the chance of having a successful project,” says Santa Rosa Community Development Director Wayne Goldberg. “The last time we had a huge burst of multifamily construction was in the mid-1980s, when the tax laws were favorable and vacancy rates were low, which made it profitable.”

Among the projects on the drawing board in Santa Rosa are 287 apartments on Highway 12 just east of Mission Boulevard, about 100 apartments in the downtown area, and 176 apartments at the Mountainview Villas.

But for people like Pincus, many of the apartments coming on line are hardly affordable, charging upwards of $1,000 a month for a one-bedroom apartment.

When Colleen Fernald Molinari’s landlord wanted to sell the southwest Santa Rosa house she was renting with her husband, a local high-tech-industry worker, and two kids, the family was forced to settle for a smaller three-bedroom house, with almost no yard, and fixer-upper frustrations. The monthly rent? $1,475, almost 50 percent more than they were paying for a roomier, more upscale place.

Molinari, who works in production and distribution at the Independent, says they can’t afford Sonoma County rents. “People stuck in the middle like us have it the hardest. We make too much to qualify for special programs, but not enough to get out of debt,” she says. “We live really frugally. We don’t go on trips. We don’t even go out. Our routine is a video and a grocery store pizza on a Friday night.”

Indeed, Molinari was on the verge of moving to Austin, Texas, last summer, where “you can get twice the home for the price.” But the move fell through, and the couple is now struggling to keep up with the high cost of living locally.

THE TIGHT HOUSING market means more calls for Sonoma County Rental Information and Mediation Services, a publicly funded program that tries to resolve disputes between landlords and tenants. These days it’s about evictions, rent hikes, and desperate pleas for help in finding places to live.

“We get a lot more calls from people that can’t find housing,” says SCRIMS executive director Sherry Couts. “All we can do is refer them to the newspapers and property management firms.”

Tenants can’t believe that multiple rent hikes are legal, says SCRIMS operations manager John Shaw. “We’re coming up against people who think there is rent control. There isn’t. A landlord can raise the rent 2 cents or $2,000, and can raise it every month of the year.”

And if a landlord wants a tenant out, 30-day notice is the only requirement, no cause needed. “That can be really devastating,” Shaw says. “You won’t get another apartment with an eviction on your record.”

SCRIMS is a barebones operation, with one full-time and one part-time employee, aging equipment, and dwindling funding, trying to do mediation for a county of half a million. In a rental market that is increasingly hostile for tenants, SCRIMS doesn’t have the resources to keep up with demand, says David Brigode, housing director at People for Economic Opportunity.

“We have to come up with a new approach to deal with private-sector housing, a better tenant-landlord program, a better fair-housing program,” Brigode says. “People don’t know their rights, or are scared to exercise their rights. . . . There’s no outreach to other agencies or to farm workers to educate people.”

Brigode says that this spring PEO will be vying for SCRIMS’ funding contract from the county and the city of Santa Rosa. PEO, along with Fair Housing in Marin County, already received a $300,000 grant from Housing and Urban Development to do education, outreach, and fair-housing enforcement.

The need for a more aggressive approach to rental mediation is urgent, Brigode says. “Housing is nowhere near job growth,” he says. “It’s like musical chairs. The music stops and someone is left homeless.”

MICHAL PINCUS and her partner did find a way out of their attic garret. They now live in a converted garage, sharing a bathroom and kitchen with six other people. The rent is $400 a month, and the landlord is a friend. But she still dreams of finding a place of their own that’s affordable and livable.

“It’s depressing,” she says about the rental market. “We really have to look at what we’re doing here, and at the greed that’s dictating how we’re making our decisions. It’s changing the face of Sonoma County. You’re driving out people who don’t have a lot of money.

“Ever since the Reagan ’80s, it has become a privilege to have a home,” she adds. “This is wrong. Housing is not a privilege. . . . It is not just for the rich.”

From the January 27-February 2, 2000 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

‘Accomplice’

0

Life Sentence

Crime doesn’t pay in ‘Accomplice’

By Daedalus Howell

IF, AS AUTHOR Graham Greene suggests, “Thrillers are like life–more like life than you are. It’s what we’ve all made of the world,” then Sonoma County Repertory Theatre’s production of Rupert Holmes’ would-be thriller-comedy Accomplice, directed by Diane Bailey, should weigh heavily on everyone’s conscience.

Intended as a comic deconstruction of the ordinary two-act thriller, Accomplice is predicated on innumerable plot twists and ends up suffering painfully from its own cleverness.

Opening at the ubiquitous “country house,” the play introduces us to a sex-starved wife (Rebecca Allington) who plots with her secret lover (Jonathan Kesser) to dispose of her rigidly conventional husband (Eric Thompson). But lo! No sooner is the trajectory of this plot established than it’s chucked for a more scintillating counterplot involving a pair of double-crossing and lip-locking wives, which is soon upgraded to a pair of double-crossing and lip-locking husbands. But wait, there’s more . . .

Indeed, this play has more plots than a cemetery. But, alas, they’re all dead. In the spirit of a whodunit, one is compelled to ask: Who killed them? The first suspect, of course, is Holmes himself, who suffocates the play with a collection of storytelling devices in which style lords it mercilessly over substance. In cahoots with the playwright is Bailey, whose usually taut directorial reins seem to have slackened with this production. Her cast is let loose to trample the dialogue with missed beats and tired segues.

Despite the misdirection, the players occasionally brighten the circuitous plot with a few moments of genuine jollity, as when Allington comically undulates beneath a duvet with Kesser, whose initially villainous incarnation in the play is part Dudley Moore, part dud. That Allington, at one point, opens a bottle of poison with her mouth is a perfect symbol of the play’s tendency to flirt with disaster.

Kudos go to actress Kori Krehbiel, who endures a ridiculous and endlessly protracted bra gag for the duration of the second act’s first scene while portraying an unsteady ingenue. Later, she dispenses some fairly comic stage business with her character’s ear-piercing vocal exercises.

Eric Thompson’s turns as a gelded husband and anguished auteur also garner some chuckles, but ultimately his talents seem squandered.

The cast’s British accents are fickle at best–one could hear better English on a billiard ball. But then we fall into one of the strange trapdoors in Accomplice: in one of the play’s myriad realities, the players are portraying poor actors in an even poorer play. Unfortunately, it’s easy to distinguish the multiple realities of the play from the singular reality experienced by those sitting in the theater’s seats–one marked by tedium and tired buns.

To complement the production’s bad-play-within-a-bad play conceit, designers Michael Mingoia and Mac McCormick have devised an incredibly garish living-room set swabbed in a hue of jaundice-yellow seldom seen outside a hepatitis clinic.

In the end, the Accomplice does not succeed in roping the audience into service as a partner in crime. Instead, the play is merely a dress rehearsal for what otherwise looks to be a promising new season for SCR.

Accomplice continues through Feb. 19, beginning at 8 p.m. Thursdays through Saturdays, with 2 p.m. performances on Jan. 30 and Feb. 6 , at Sonoma County Repertory Theatre, 104 N. Main St., Sebastopol. $10-$15. 823-0177.

From the January 27-February 2, 2000 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Ronin Ro

Beaten to a Pulp

‘Street Sweeper’ bills itself as the first hip-hop novel, but the pulpy plot stinks

By Patrick Sullivan

GOOD NOVELS sneak up on you. The plot takes turns the reader never expects, but in the end, the author has you convinced that things couldn’t have gone any other way.

Then there’s Street Sweeper ([S]affiliated; $15.95), billed by its publisher as “the first hip-hop novel.” Here is a book that sweats marketing out every pore, from its groovy square shape to its silver-sheened cover to its author’s pseudonym, Ronin Ro. More important, here is a book that never, ever manages to surprise you. Every plot element arrives exactly on schedule–and still, despite the obvious artifice involved, nothing fits together.

How simple is the plot? Imagine a comic book without the pretty pictures and you’ll get the idea. Jerome Usher is one of the deadliest hit men ever to come out of Harlem, a high-rolling assassin whose murderous assignments fund an extravagant lifestyle full of name-brand clothing, name-brand guns, and anonymous bedmates.

Alas, this cozy arrangement is turned upside-down one fateful day when a job goes wrong and Jerome is confronted with an ugly choice. Either he rubs out a pair of witnesses, who happen to be a wounded little girl and her beautiful single mom, or he gets himself smoked by his employers. Luckily, Jerome turns out to be a ruthless killer with a heart of gold, and he plunges into a bloody struggle to protect the witnesses and earn money for a $3 million “experimental treatment” needed to help the injured girl walk again. FYI: her name is not Tiny Tim.

The writer who churned out this product wants it both ways. We’re offered a novel that wears its moral like a big wart on a little nose: killing people for money, we learn, is a bad idea. And yet the book also dwells lovingly on the minutiae of violence, offering a detailed inventory of Jerome’s gun collection and a fair number of the kind of James Bond-style shootouts that leave a trail of bodies bleeding into the dirt and our well-dressed hero merely a bit out of breath.

Even on the level of pulp, this thing doesn’t work, if only because the writing is so wretchedly bourgeois. In “Chapter Zero,” we’re taken on a tour of Jerome’s apartment, full of high-tech toys, African art, and big guns. The author sums up the decor as “tasteful and masculine.” Hey–where’d all that street language go?

Excellent books have been written about violence in the ghetto, from Geoffrey Canada’s Fist, Stick, Knife, Gun to Luis Rodriguez’s Always Running. These works of non-fiction are fueled by authenticity and genuine moral concern, two things that Street Sweeper just can’t offer. *

Virgins, Guerrillas & Locas: Gay Latinos Writing about Love Edited by Jaime Cortez (Cleis Press; $14.95)

Combing various groups of the Latin community–Puerto Ricans, Colombians, Mexicans and Chicanos–these stories range from prepubescent humor (Al Lujan’s “Strong Arms”) to first love and puberty (James Caçon’s “My Lessons with Felipe”) and maturity/acceptance of one’s self (“Sun to Sun,” by the editor).

The cover’s quasi-religious painted image of a Latin man in a wedding veil is clearly selling to people of color. The stories, however, are universal–plugging into one’s own experiences afterward is irresistible. Lujan’s bizarre memoir, a recollection of absolute blood fidelity to a molded plastic Hasbro toy, exemplifies how this anthology bends and confounds expectations.

The introduction somewhat lames the book from the outset–best to skip it. It seems to me a vehicle to sell a graspable brown-ness to white liberals; mostly it makes shaky parallels between Latinos and blacks and in the process forces their experience too much together. They are far too different for comparison. If you dodge the intro, you’ll discover true diversity,–T.M.

From the January 27-February 2, 2000 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Ramekins

0

Watching the kettle: Instructor Jay Harlow (center) gives pointers to aspiring cooks Jeff Williams and Steve Hoeft over a bubbling cauldron of minestrone.

Somethin’ Cookin’

A daylong visit to Ramekins, a visionary new culinary school that caters to kitchen-savvy home cooks and eager amateurs

A MIGHTY HISS of steam billows up from the gargantuan stove as a herd of white-apron- clad students stand about in a loose semi-circle. They stretch up on tiptoes, eyes wide with appreciation as instructor Jay Harlow expertly tosses chicken breasts onto the waiting fire. Knives of all sizes lie about the room, along with the boned remains of numerous chickens.

Bowls of chopped-and-diced-and-julienned carrots, mushrooms, cucumbers, onions, lettuce, potatoes, and chard, alongside several platters of glistening marinated chicken, stand waiting on a table nearby, where one student, a young gentleman with a very sharp knife, is methodically slicing a cucumber, his forehead furrowed in happy concentration. Harlow–the bestselling author of West Coast Seafood and Beer Cuisine–after exhorting the class to “come on back and grab a chicken breast,” glides over to encourage the hard-working knife-wielder.

“Still practicing?” he says, taking in the rising pile of cut vegetables. “Excellent work. Looks good.” Then he’s off to oversee the ongoing chicken preparations and to cheer on his students as they carefully apply all those vegetables to a massive, bubbling cauldron of minestrone. Weaving through the students, he now tackles the making of dessert: a rainbow-colored cranberry and citrus compote. “Stir the fruit gently,” coaches Harlow, peering over as the fruit mixture simmers on the stove.

“If you listen carefully, you can hear the cranberries popping.”

Everyone falls quiet, ears trained forward, listening for the sound of exploding berries. When it happens–a series of soft, liquidy snaps–an audible sigh of delight moves through the room, mingling with the sounds of overhead fans, banging pots, and clanking utensils.

And so goes a typical day at Ramekins Sonoma Valley Culinary School.

A singularly remarkable, noticeably whimsical training facility for experienced home cooks and complete novices, Ramekins–the brainchild of General’s Daughter restaurant owner Suzanne Brangham–opened its spoon-handled doors just 18 months ago, in a unique custom-designed rammed-earth building (based on an architectural method that employs vast amounts of compressed clay and soil, but no wood in its basic structure). From the beginning, Ramekins was a certified culinary phenomenon, attracting students and tourists from across the country, while drawing the enthusiastic praise–and the teaching services–of renowned cookbook authors and four-star celebrity chefs from around the world. This morning’s class, called “Knife Skills with Jay Harlow,” is one of Ramekins’ hands-on classes, in which the students–both men and women, mostly non-professional, ranging in age from fresh-faced teens to seasoned seniors–are invited to work side by side with the instructor, sharpening their skills while preparing a complete meal in the school’s bright, light-filled kitchen.

Harlow’s class–now chopping and slicing and sizzling and simmering its way to an end, just in time for lunch–is today’s morning offering; across the hall, in the gorgeous demonstration kitchen-theater, author Michele Anna Jordan is already at work preparing for her sold-out afternoon session, titled “Risotto for Winter.” As Harlow congratulates his students on a job well done, they return the compliment with a warm round of applause.

Then it’s out to the dining room to taste the fruits of their labor.

In the kitchen: Steve Mailho sniffs a sauce while Jay Bolton looks on.

A RAMEKIN–as any self-respecting foodie will tell you–is a small fluted French baking crock, great for baking but most commonly used, these days, to hold butter and jam. They are inexpensive devices, unpretentious, handy and useful, lightweight and easy to pick up and carry with you. As metaphors go, the simple ramekin was a perfect, if not immediately obvious, symbol of Brangham’s user-friendly vision for the new school. That the funny little word bears an auditory resemblance to the term “rammed”–as in “rammed-earth” architecture–added rhyme and reason to Brangham’s decision to name the place Ramekins.

Located in downtown Sonoma–in the midst of the wine country–the school has seen a dramatic increase in applicants from outside the area. According to culinary director Bob Nemerovski, only about a third of Ramekins’ students are from Sonoma County, with another third hailing from Marin County and San Francisco and “parts south of San Jose.”

The remaining students are, basically, from everywhere else, a development that Brangham and Nemerovski never expected, but prepared for just in case. Along with the school and the classes, priced at $40 and up, Ramekins’ other attraction is a plush five-room bed-and-breakfast operation–including a regal chef’s suite for visiting celebrities–located in the upstairs portion of the building, arrived at via a typical Brangham invention: a stairway with a spindled banister made of green wooden asparagus stalks. Throughout, every detail giggles whimsy as it whispers elegance.

“Well, we believe in treating people well,” says Nemerovski.

The bivalved heart of Ramekins, of course, is the twin kitchen facility, where chefs such as Mollie Katzen, John Ash, Gary Danko, Narsai David, Mark Miller (Coyote Cafe) and Joyce Goldstein have blended their expertise with Nemerovski’s distinct philosophy; namely, that a cooking class should be part education, part entertainment–and should always end with really good food. “Since putting out our second catalog of classes,” Nemerovski says, “there are very few chefs who, when I call to invite them to teach at Ramekins, say, ‘Who? What’s Ramekins?’ Now they just say, ‘When should I be there?'”

“IT’S A WONDERFUL PLACE, a wonderful facility,” says Harlow, getting the buffet line to dish up the chow his class just created: sautéed chicken breasts with Madeira sauce, classic minestrone, and tossed green salad. Dessert will be served later by Ramekins’ attentive staff of helpers, under the direction of assistant manager and host Andrea Koweek, now busy pouring wine, red and white, at each of the students’ dining tables. Harlow, who’s been teaching at Ramekins since it first opened, is clearly enamored of the place. “Some cooking schools, especially those aimed at professional chefs, are very stuffy,” he says. “But Ramekins is organized with the belief that cooking should be fun. Ask anyone who was here today. These people had fun.”

That is immediately obvious. Throughout the enormous, peak-ceilinged dining room–packed with such Brangham touches as a hearth-side coffee table with many large bananas reclining under the glass top–the energy level is that of a rock concert crowd immediately after the show. “I’m just grateful I didn’t cut myself,” laughs Jeff Williams, one of the “Knife Skills” students, now carrying his plate to a nearby table. “I always feel exhilarated after a class,” says Nancy Vizi, who counts herself as a Ramekins regular. “I love it. Afterwards, I don’t want to stop talking about how much fun it is.”

Brangham stops in to chat with Harlow, and makes sure to quiz the students on their experience. Then she makes a shocking confession. “I love food, but I don’t know how to cook,” she admits with a laugh. “I have a few more projects on the table; then I’ve promised myself I’m going to take a few cooking classes myself.”

Photograph by Michael Amsler

TODAY’S morning class, with its even blend of male and female students, is fairly typical of Harlow’s past offerings. “Jay gets a good mix of men and women,” says Koweek, who elaborates, “We’re getting more and more husband-and-wife teams coming in for classes, though pastry classes still tend to skew female while sausage-making workshops always tend to skew male.”

Adds Nemorovski, “This one guy came in recently and said, ‘All right, I don’t know who you are, I’ve never been here before, but I’m glad my wife is interested in you rather than in Ricky Martin. She left your catalog in the bathroom, she’s dog-eared the pages, and she’s circled the dates. I decided I’d better take the hint,’ and he bought those classes for her. Now they’re both big fans.”

Joanne Weir, host of PBS’ Weir Cooking in the Wine Country, is another big fan of Ramekins.

On-site this week for a special program–in which she worked with a dozen professional chefs, not Ramekins’ main clientele, but a group that was instantly enamored of the school’s facilities–has taught at the school a number of times. “Aside from the staff and the facility itself,” she says, “I always find that the students are almost always just wonderful. They are savvy and intelligent, and they are interested and eager. And they are clearly here to have a good time.”

Weir, who’ll be back in March for a spring cooking class, has seen a strong national trend toward cooking schools, with many grocery store chains installing teaching facilities and running classes on the side. “It’s the next big thing in entertainment,” she says, “and Ramekins knows that.

“Above all, they know how to put on a really good show.”

Photograph by Michael Amsler

IT’S SHOW TIME in the demonstration theater, and the students–the audience–have taken their seats, three to a table, each table preset with cutlery, wine glasses, and packets of recipes and instructions. Every seat affords a clear view of the kitchen “stage”–with video monitors showing the stovetop and an overhead mirror revealing events on the counter–where Michele Anna Jordan, relaxed and happy after hours of prep work–“I tend to be ridiculously ambitious with my classes,” she says–is chatting with incoming folks as the Ramekins staff bustle about offering students iced tea and mineral water. Dean Martin sings from overhead. “Music is a very important part of the cooking process,” she jokes easily. “But you have to choose carefully. Either Dean Martin or Puccini are good for cooking risotto, while the Ramones are great when you have a lot of chopping and prep work.”

And the class begins.

Jordan, one could argue, is the purest embodiment of the food-education-entertainment trinity that rules the Ramekins philosophy. As she deftly prepares one risotto dish after another, from Golden Beet Risotto & Walnuts to Polenta Cakes & Warm Mushroom Vinaigrette to Grilled Pork Tenderloins with Apricot Risotto to Turkey & Cranberry Risotto, she dispenses pages of facts and cooking tips–“Always use an ice cream scoop to make your risotto cakes”–along with numerous witty observations: “Risotto is a Zen-like experience because you have to stand here and constantly stir it. It’s also useful for getting other people to do tasks you don’t want to do. ‘Honey, the cat just threw up. Could you get that? I’m making risotto.'”

Once Jordan has talked us through the making of Golden Beet Risotto, the kitchen staff whisks the food out of the room and promptly returns to serve it up to the students–along with more wine. The room is filled with fervent murmurs of mid-meal appreciation. Jordan loves it. This prep-and-joke-and-serve process is repeated several more times, with each dish she demonstrates, until at last, as the class ends–with the requisite round of applause–Jordan happily announces, “Once you’ve practiced a while, once you really know risotto, once you’ve learned the basic principles, you’ll be able to make risotto without ever looking at a recipe.

“Now . . . go do it.”

Fruits of their labor: Students savor the results of their cooking class.

BY ALL OUTWARD appearances, Ramekins seems to be on its way to further success, with long-distance plans to compile a Ramekins cookbook and a series of videos; there may even be a Ramekins cooking show somewhere down the line. Until then, Nemerovski is focusing on extending Ramekins’ good word of mouth, building on the school’s growing reputation as a full-on, must-experience wine country phenomenon. Nemerovski is doing so, he says, by fine-tuning the day-to-day details of keeping the place running smoothly and by paying attention to customers, every comment, good or bad.

“We’ve run nearly 500 classes in 18 months,” says Nemerovski, “with over 225 instructors. We’ve sold over 12,000 seats, and in that time we’ve had exactly five letters suggesting some little thing that we could do better. And in each case, we’ve made the appropriate changes. The main Ramekins rule is that basic rule of retailing,” he says, laughing. ” ‘Always assume you can do more to make your customers happy.’ And with a place like Ramekins, making people happy is a whole lot of fun.”

From the January 27-February 2, 2000 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Mustard Festival

0

Ol’ Yeller

Mustard Festival spreads it on

By Marina Wolf

IN NAPA VALLEY, Mother Nature gets the last laugh on those who think the coldest time of the year is the dreariest. Long after the harvest crush of tourists has faded, crazy yellow blooms of wild mustard burst out along fences and between bare rows of gnarled vines. “It actually lends the valley to a whole other season that people don’t ever see,” says Patrick Finney, host chef for this year’s ambitious Napa Valley Mustard Festival.

The festival, running Jan. 29 through March 25 (see sidebar), is meant to honor the sunny mustard plant, all parts of which are actually edible. But in these parts, the wild weed gets used primarily for garnish. Even in the mustard festival chef competition, the mustard principle usually comes from prepared mustard instead of the whole seed.

If you’re having problems envisioning sophisticated cuisine incorporating the yellow spice, perhaps you’re stuck in that hot-dog-and pretzel paradigm. Let Finney help you out with the dish that earned him the title 1999 Chef of the Year at last year’s festival: smoked chicken with a mustard-cream sauce, served on a crispy wonton and accompanied by apple-Maui onion chow-chow. This exotic dish also earned the Napa Valley Wine Train chef the “People’s Choice” honor, but Finney isn’t resting on his laurels. He’s already engaged in “research and development” on his entry for this year’s competition.

Finney doesn’t use mustard as a mustard-season gimmick. This humble condiment, in all its variations, has a regular place in Finney’s rolling pantry, adding savor and a hint of sharpness to some of the train’s signature dishes. In his chicken liver and truffle paté, for example, Finney accents the dish with both Dijon and whole-grain mustard. Another dining-car favorite is his sturgeon with a saffron-mustard beurre blanc sauce. The traditional white-wine-and-butter sauce is touched with the intense color of saffron, and then spiced up with mustard at the very last minute, a key point for anyone cooking with mustard, says Finney.

“You never want to boil or overheat mustard,” he explains, “because it becomes very bitter. Add it at the last minute, unless you’re dealing with the whole seed.”

FOR THIS YEAR’S opening event, “Mustard Magic: Une Soirée Française,” Finney is planning another old favorite: a rack of lamb rubbed with a mild achiote paste before roasting, and then sauced with a chipotle pepper and whole-grain mustard concoction. “I’ve done this the last couple of years and people have asked for me to do it again.” He laughs. “I don’t want to let anybody down.”

As with anything in Napa Valley, the annual Mustard Festival has a serious wine component. Bernard Portet, president and winemaker at Clos du Val, is this year’s host winemaker, lending a decidedly French flair to the proceedings. But still one pauses over the question–maybe it’s that classist, anti-mustard prejudice again–what kind of wine does one drink with mustard flavors?

For starters, it’s not usually an issue because most chefs prefer to keep the mustard in a complementary role, harmonizing gently with the primary flavors of the dish. “If you get to the point where mustard is the main flavor, then you’ve pretty much defeated the purpose of the dish,” Finney says. “You might as well be serving a bowl of mustard.”

The primary considerations, then, are the main ingredients of the dish, but mustard’s pungency cannot be ignored. In the case of his sturgeon dish, Finney recommends a sauvignon blanc, a fumé blanc, or even a chardonnay, “depending on how it was made,” he says.

“I’d want some woody overtones to cut the strength of the mustard.”

Those who can appreciate that subtlety are the target ticketholders to the Mustard Festival. But Finney relates a story that illustrates the pull of mustard’s magic on foodies of all ages. Either that or it might be another only-in-the-Bay Area item. Last year he brought in samples of mustard for the kiddies at his son’s elementary school. They dipped and nibbled mustards from all along the spectrum, from French’s brand–a staple for hot-dog lovers–to samples from the Mount Horeb Mustard Museum in Wisconsin. The hot-dog mustard ended up with the most praise, but not all of it.

“It was funny to watch,” says Finney. “Definitely hot-dog mustard was the favorite, but there were a number of children who tried the other ones–raspberry, apricot, zinfandel–and liked them very much. They probably went home and turned their parents on to them.” *

Festival Schedule

Mustard Magic Art, theater, music, and even aerial artistes load the opening event with an oh-so-French feel at the Culinary Institute of America at Greystone on Saturday, Jan. 29, at 7 p.m. The many-storied stone mansion lends itself to wandering and tasting from the offerings of Napa Valley chefs and winemakers. CIA-Greystone is at 2555 Main St. in St. Helena. Tickets are $95 per person in advance, $125 at the door. For information or tickets, call 259-9020.

Savor St. Helena The little town that could invites weekend guests to its downtown for a tasteful street fair that covers all of the important points: food, wine, music–ooh, and window-shopping! Tasting tickets and wine glasses are available on-site. Saturday, Feb. 13, from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. For a list of participating businesses and restaurants, see the website at www.StHelena.com, or call 963-4456.

The Awards Chefs go for the gusto in the night that decides the Mustard Festival chef for next year. Sensory scientists from UC-Davis and food journalists from all over judge the recipes, then the public samples and votes for its favorite. Clos Pegase Winery hosts in its reception hall and caves. Friday, March 10, at 7 p.m. Tickets are $75 per person in advance, $100 at the door; net proceeds benefit Napa Valley art, historical, and educational organizations. 259-9020.

!Olé Mostaza! Robert Mondavi Winery opens its doors for an evening of fine art, rare wines, and great auction packages, along with Latin music and appropriate hors d’oeuvres. Saturday, March 11, at 7 p.m. Tickets are $65 per person; proceeds benefit the River School, Napa Valley’s art-based charter school. 253-6813.

The Marketplace A foodie fantasy come true at the Napa Valley Exposition, where dozens of demos and scads of samples, plus music, exhibits, arts and crafts, and other great divertissements fill the building. Saturday and Sunday, March 11-12, from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. Tickets are $7 for adults, $2 for children 12 and under; tasting package is available for $25. 259-9020.

A Taste of Yountville The most gourmet restaurants per capita and more high-class fun per square foot in this afternoon of good taste and the good life, hosted by eateries and retailers up and down the downtown. Tasting tickets are available on-site; most demonstrations are free. Saturday, March 18, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. 944-0904.

Other events include a golf benefit, a marathon, a Blessing of the Balloons, and a photography contest, the finalists of which will be announced at “The Photo Finish,” the wrap-up extravaganza on Saturday, March 25, at 7 p.m. Tickets are $65 per person in advance, $75 at the door. For further details about any of the festival events, call 259-9020.

From the January 27-February 2, 2000 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Usual Suspects

0

Wright stuff: Nothing rotten in Santa Rosa, says Councilwoman Sharon Wright. Critics disagree.

Flippy Floppy

Santa Rosa City Council does about-face on planning appointment

By Janet Wells

THE SANTA ROSA City Council engaged in some furious backpedaling this week, voting to undo the week-old appointment of a planning ommissioner who failed to turn in his application on time and who has a glaring potential for conflict-of-interest tangles.

After two rounds of straw balloting, the council voted 5 to 2 last week to appoint Ghilotti Construction Co. manager Paul Donaldson to a four-year term replacing retiring Commissioner Frances Dias. Councilwoman Marsha Vas Dupre voted for Donaldson, then went on the warpath after learning that he submitted part of the application for the position 11 days after the Nov. 19 deadline and waited another 42 days to turn in the completed form.

Donaldson’s employer, Ghilotti Construction, has numerous contracts with developers whose projects would come before the Planning Commission and the City Council. Donaldson maintained that his job would not hamper his ability to fairly perform as a commissioner.

“Something stinks in Santa Rosa,” Vas Dupre writes in an e-mail to Usual Suspects. “I would guess that some incentives were provided to the four majority members of the council to convince them that this young, unseasoned man be selected for the Planning Commission.”

The city followed its usual procedure when searching for a new planning commissioner: the position’s requirements–and its application deadline–were listed in the local daily newspaper on Nov. 10.

Twelve people submitted applications, and Vas Dupre and City Councilwoman Sharon Wright, acting as the council subcommittee, whittled the field to five applicants, who interviewed for the position on Jan. 18.

City Attorney Rene Chouteau told West End Neighborhood Association president and Santa Rosa City Council candidate Carol Dean that the council isn’t bound to follow its procedure and can appoint commissioners at will.

But, says Dean, by not following the accepted selection process, the council is treading on thin ice. “The worst of all is the appearance that the majority on this council is making a backroom deal, once again bending the rules to fulfill a hidden agenda,” Dean told the council at this week’s meeting.

“Nobody through the whole process told me I had missed any dates,” says Donaldson, who adds that the council is “hanging” the reversal of his appointment on his late application. The real reason, he says, is “politics,” although he declines to be more specific.

AT THIS WEEK’S council meeting, City Manager Ken Blackman blamed his former secretary, as well as the screening committee and the City Council, for failing to note the tardy date on Donaldson’s application. “Bureaucrats don’t miss that stuff,” scoffed council gadfly Jack Osborne. “This looks so darn bad, like you have a filing date for friends.”

Councilwoman Noreen Evans, who voted against Donaldson’s appointment, agrees that the council’s actions seem to exceed mere sloppiness. “It looks like somebody decided to go around the deadline and get that application filed.

“Who it was or why it was, I can’t speculate on that.”

The Donaldson appointment spurred some critics to argue that the motivation rested on the fact that the council majority backs a pair of upcoming ballot measures that would raise local sales taxes to fund freeway improvements. The campaign to promote one of those measures is supported financially by Jim Ghilotti, who owns the local construction company for which Donaldson works.

Mayor Janet Condron dismissed speculation that the council had a darker purpose. “The implication that there is something wrong here is totally inappropriate,” she said.

Wright also said she “took exception to the inference that there was something deceitful.”

Attorney Dick Day–a member of the board of directors of Sonoma County Conservation, speaking as a member of Concerned Citizens for Santa Rosa–was happy to speculate for the council: “The whole appearance is that the applicants did not represent the pro-development stance of the council and [they] went to some trouble to find someone after the [deadline] date who would.”

Donaldson was part of last year’s Leadership Santa Rosa program, which has been criticized for grooming political insiders to fill appointee positions.

Evans, along with Vas Dupre and Councilman Steve Rabinowitsh, pushed hard to persuade their colleagues to toss Donaldson’s application and appoint in his stead Allen Thomas, who was the council’s second choice last week.

“Allen Thomas has years and years of working with his neighborhood and coming before the council and Planning Commission. He’s been a very articulate representative for the West End neighborhood,” Evans says.

“I thought he was a better candidate. I was concerned about Mr. Donaldson’s lack of experience in the community and civic matters and also his potential for conflicts of interest.”

The council compromised, tossing out Donaldson’s application, but declining to appoint Thomas outright. Instead, on Feb. 8, the council will recast votes for the remaining four applicants.

“It’s a little disconcerting that the people who follow the rules are not respected,” Thomas says. “And I think it’s a lot deeper than Allen Thomas not getting on the Planning Commission.

“There’s a level of mistrust.”

Editor Greg Cahill contributed to this article.

From the January 27-February 2, 2000 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

‘Edge of Seventeen’

Edge of Seventeen. Ohio Player A boy's coming out in Sandusky By IT'S 1984 on the coast of Ohio. Eric (Chris Stafford), who lives in the Lake Erie resort town of Sandusky, has just completed his junior year in high school. Stafford, the star of David Moreton's film Edge of...

Himalayan Chhahari

x Mountain menu: Fans of Nepalese cuisine have something to rave about with the advent of Himalayan Chhahari in downtown Santa Rosa. Pictured are chef/owner Raju Mothe, Yagya Shrestha, and Sujana Shrestha. Taste Trek Savor the exotic at Himalayan Chhahari By Paula Harris THERE'S NOTHING like traveling...

Sonoma County Filmmakers

Blast from the past: Sonoma County filmmaker Abe Levy cradles the antique camera he used as a student. These days, Levy employs state-of-the-art digital technology to make his films. Reel Deal Local filmmakers shoot for the big time By Daedalus Howell "WE'RE READY for your close-up, Mr. Howell,"...

Martha’s

Vision quest: Martha Lopez lends a personal touch to the upscale Mexican cuisine at her popular west county establishment. On Her Own Sebastopol restaurateur Martha Lopez finds a place to play house By Marina Wolf CHEFING is a transient business. There's always a better gig at the new...

Rental Housing

No room at the inn: Maceo Campbell and Michal Pincus moved to the county five years ago in search of affordable housing. Instead, they found escalating rents and landlords who charged exorbitant rates for substandardshelter. No Vacancy Tight housing market makes local rentals a competitive game By Janet Wells...

‘Accomplice’

Life Sentence Crime doesn't pay in 'Accomplice' By Daedalus Howell IF, AS AUTHOR Graham Greene suggests, "Thrillers are like life--more like life than you are. It's what we've all made of the world," then Sonoma County Repertory Theatre's production of Rupert Holmes' would-be thriller-comedy Accomplice, directed by Diane Bailey, should weigh...

Ronin Ro

Beaten to a Pulp 'Street Sweeper' bills itself as the first hip-hop novel, but the pulpy plot stinks By Patrick Sullivan GOOD NOVELS sneak up on you. The plot takes turns the reader never expects, but in the end, the author has you convinced that things couldn't have gone any other...

Ramekins

Watching the kettle: Instructor Jay Harlow (center) gives pointers to aspiring cooks Jeff Williams and Steve Hoeft over a bubbling cauldron of minestrone. Somethin' Cookin' A daylong visit to Ramekins, a visionary new culinary school that caters to kitchen-savvy home cooks and eager amateurs A MIGHTY HISS...

Mustard Festival

Ol' Yeller Mustard Festival spreads it on By Marina Wolf IN NAPA VALLEY, Mother Nature gets the last laugh on those who think the coldest time of the year is the dreariest. Long after the harvest crush of tourists has faded, crazy yellow blooms of wild mustard burst out along fences...

Usual Suspects

Wright stuff: Nothing rotten in Santa Rosa, says Councilwoman Sharon Wright. Critics disagree. Flippy Floppy Santa Rosa City Council does about-face on planning appointment By Janet Wells THE SANTA ROSA City Council engaged in some furious backpedaling this week, voting to undo the week-old appointment of...
11,084FansLike
4,446FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow