Utah Phillips

0

State’s Man



Utah Phillips stays close to his roots

By Bruce Robinson

HE WASN’T BORN THERE, but Bruce “Utah” Phillips has chosen to be known professionally for the state in which he came of age, a wide-open slice of the West he continues to regard as his home. It was there he developed the leftist political perspective that shaped his subsequent activities as a labor organizer, political gadfly, and, most enduringly, folk singer.

While Salt Lake City in the 1950s may seem like an improbable place for such an outlook to take shape, it was a natural outgrowth of his upbringing. “My mother worked for the CIO [labor organization]. She was a radical, a red. And my father was a communist,” the 63-year old Phillips recalls in a phone conversation from his Nevada City home.

“The books were always there. There was never any pressure for me to be in certain ways, but the tools were always there, the tools that, if you absorb them, give you the analysis needed to figure out what’s going on around you.

“For instance, when I joined the Army and went over to Korea, I had the tools to understand cultural imperialism when I was lookin’ at it, and most of the people around me didn’t. So I spent a lot of time trying to explain it.”

That radical bent still is evidenced in his music– including a 1997 duet album with radical feminist folkie Ani DiFranco–and in Phillips’ repeated candidacies for the U.S. Senate and presidential campaigns. He brings his politico-folk tunes to the Kate Wolf Memorial Music Festival June 27-28 in Sebastopol at a star-studded tribute to the late Marin singer and songwriter. He also appears–along with Emmylou Harris, Kathy Mattea, Dave Alvin, and others–on Treasures Left Behind, Remembering Kate Wolf (Red House), a new tribute CD.

THOSE RADICAL ROOTS run deep. Returning to Utah after his tour of duty, Phillips rejoined the Industrial Workers of the World and plunged into labor activism and organizing. “I organized for the Utah Migrant Council and in a barrio in west Ogden and for the Poor People’s Party.” And even though Utah is hardly a hotbed of union strength–this was the state that executed labor organizer Joe Hill back in 1915, he points out –“I got along pretty well because I decided early on that the LDS [Latter Day Saints] people weren’t my enemies.

“The good thing about being a radical in Utah,” he continues, “is that the Mormons–who own the state–are dead-honest people. They’re wrong, but they’re honest. They play by the rules. They make up dumb rules, like anybody else, but they play by them. You can predict any response to a given provocation. I found out when I went east what corruption really is. They make up the rules–same dumb rules–and if you figure out how to beat ’em, they change ’em. So it’s much more fluid, much trickier.”

PHILLIPS HAS RECORDED infrequently over the past 30 years, but has seen dozens of his songs recorded by other artists, from long-time cohort Rosalie Sorrels to Kate Breslin and Jody Stecher’s 1997, Grammy- nominated Heart Songs.

It was through a Sorrels’ recording of Phillips’ “If I Could Be the Rain” that Phillips came to the attention of a young Kate Wolf. “She told me she listened to that record and said, ‘If he can do that, then I can,’ and she started writing songs,” says Phillips, who met Wolf when she invited him to an early Santa Rosa Folk Festival.

A generation apart in age, they were kindred spirits musically, and soon afterward began to tour together regularly. “I had started out singing in the east after I left Utah in ’69, and the audiences were pretty well developed,” Phillips recalls. “And I knew that they wanted, they needed, to hear Kate. They needed to hear something from the West besides me, and Kate was quintessential Californian. So I booked a long tour and we drove it, and she got to play in Hartford and Boston and all over everywhere.”

But even more than performing together, Phillips remembers Wolf, who died of leukemia in 1986, as a friend who pushed him to do more. “She would provoke me into doing things that I would otherwise take too long to do or never do,” he recalls. “She got in the habit of haranguing me to go through my journals, which were a bag full of papers with scribbles on them, and putting music to those songs, or demanding that I finish them.”

Predictably, Phillips has been a fixture at the Kate Wolf Memorial Music Festivals near Occidental, a classic folk-music gathering that, Phillips says, still falls short of his idea of genuine acoustic music. “The only way to make music acoustic,” he growls, “is to reach down and deftly disconnect your instrument from the second industrial revolution.”

The 3rd annual Kate Wolf Memorial Music Festival will be held Saturday and Sunday, June 27-28, at Caswell Vineyards west of Sebastopol. Saturday’s lineup features Laurie Lewis, Ferron, Greg Brown, Cheryl Wheeler, Utah Phillips, and others; Sunday highlights Nanci Griffith, Greg Brown, Utah Phillips and Rosalie Sorrels, Guy Clark, and others. Tickets are $32 a day or $60 for both days; discounts are available for seniors, students, and children. 829-7067.

From the June 18-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Ready-to-drink Merlot

0

Ready Reds

LOOKING for a ready-to-drink merlot for tonight’s dinner? The following Sonoma County bottlings, (rated on a scale of one to four corks, with one being average and four sublime) won’t disappoint.

Ferrari-Carano 1995, Sonoma County A deep core of blackberry, cassis, and cedar with a hint of dill in a nicely balanced, flavorful wine. 4 corks.

Louis M. Martini 1994 Reserve, Russian River Valley A massively structured, very fruit-forward wine complemented by creamy oak nuances and a long cherry/berry finish. 3.5 corks.

Louis M. Martini (1995) 25th Anniversary, Russian River Valley Made from 100 percent Russian River Valley merlot, with the grapes selected from the best lots of the vineyard. It was aged in a combination of French, American, and Hungarian oak for a total of 22 months. Still tight and tannic, with time this wine opens up in the glass to a big, chewy mouthful with good structure, which bodes well for short- to mid-term aging. Tasty black fruit flavors dominate, but a few years are needed before the “mellow” tag can be applied. 3.5 corks.

Windsor 1995 Signature Series, Sonoma Valley A lighter-bodied merlot with toasted oak, black olive, black cherry, geranium, and woodspice aromas and flavors. 3.5 corks.

Ravenswood 1994 Vintners Blend Cherry, vanilla, and plum aromas, with spicy berry flavors. Soft and easy-drinking, this is the perfect hamburger wine. A great value (under $10) and already in limited supply. 2.5 corks.

Canyon Road 1995, California A fragrant berry nose leads to a silky-smooth berry flavor with a touch of vanillin oak. A value-priced wine for everyday drinking from the sister winery of premium producer Geyser Peak. 2 corks.

Stone Creek 1995, California Black cherry, cedar, and plum aromas and flavors, complemented by subtle dusty oak. Another good value in a generally overpriced merlot market. 2 corks.

From the June 18-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

No Holds Bard

0

Edgy Bard


Michael Amsler

Saucy knaves: Jacqueline Zahos, left, Rebecca Allington, and Bill Killinger take a ride on Shakespeare’s wild side in ‘No Holds Bard’, part of the Sonoma Valley Shakespeare Festival.

New Fringe Festival delivers Shakespeare’s maximum insults

By Daedalus Howell

A PESTILENT GALL to me!” Shakespeare’s King Lear barks when his pugnacious fool recites a particularly ribald aphorism–a devilish number comparing truth to a stinking dog. Similar vitriol would surely bellow forth from the dysfunctional patriarch today were he to attend the new Shakespeare on the Fringe Festival operating under the aegis of the Sonoma Valley Shakespeare Festival.

Lear’s line would be an appropriate retort to the newborn endeavor–the fringe festival is envisioned as an irreverent, annual send-up of the Bard in the mode of its inaugural show, No Holds Bard, or Shakespeare’s Maximum Insults scribed by SVSF artistic director Carl Hamilton.

An original comedy depicting four actors (and a fool) enamored with the Bard’s bombastic and incendiary verbal affronts, Hamilton’s work is a loose play-within-a-play that features actors merrily firing off volleys of Shakespeare’s declamatory derisions when properly provoked. Never one to forgo an obscure pop-culture reference, the playwright named his characters after the ’60s wife-swapping flick Bob & Ted & Carol & Alice.

“With the Shakespeare Festival I always try to do one non-Shakespeare show,” explains Hamilton, a longtime iconoclast of local theater. “Last year I did the Complete Works of Shakespeare Abridged from the Reduced Shakespeare Company. It’s kind of a fringy show, and it went over really well–it was a major hit for us. I had been acquainting myself with the fringe festivals out there and I got this idea to create one that kind of takes Shakespeare’s works, deconstructs them, and makes fun of them.”

Hamilton’s inspiration for No Holds Bard came when his mind was drifting during a class at the University of California at Davis, where he studied theater directing.

“I was in graduate school in one of those required classes–a theater history class–and I was utterly bored,” Hamilton recalls. “I had this book with me called Shakespeare’s Insults: Educating Your Wit [compiled by Wayne F. Hill and Cynthia J. Ottchen]. So, I was just sitting there, looking through it, thinking, ‘How could I turn some of these into scenes?'”

Hamilton’s initial undertaking–titled Shakespeare’s Insults and Other Tidbits–premiered at Rohnert Park’s Spreckels Performing Arts Center in 1995. Three years and some rewriting later, the show has evolved into the present insult-fest, which promises to be a tour de force of putdowns.

“People really enjoy the insults part–the words are so flowery and poetic,” Hamilton says wryly. Indeed, in a society where road-rage drivers find the handgun in the glove box more poignant than the proverbial “finger,” boning up on some flowery and poetic insults could well prove socially progressive.

Hamilton offers a preview: “There’s one insult that really grosses people out–‘Your virginity breeds mites much like cheese,’ or something like that.”

He then adds with relish: “Eat my leek! You crusty batch of nature!”

Hamilton isn’t alone in enjoying such bawdy fare. In fact, two websites that randomly generate Shakespeare-like insults (http://www.tower.org/insult/ and http://alabanza.com/kabacoff/Inter-Links/cgi-bin/bard.pl) receive abundant hits from insult enthusiasts and even enjoyed mention in Newsweek last year.

So why distill Shakespeare’s oeuvre down to a linguistic barbecue of scorn? In part, suggests Hamilton, to liberate the Bard from the confines of academia’s ivory tower.

“I think that the general populace sort of looks at Shakespeare, but the critics and the intellectuals have made it so snooty,” Hamilton says. “The people who really understand Shakespeare realize that he wrote for the middle class, common folk, and that it was just entertainment–sitcoms for the Renaissance period.”

So A Midsummer’s Night Dream was really just an Elizabethan Seinfeld? History suggests this may have been the case.

“I’m one of those people who enjoys making fun, not of Shakespeare, but of the people who take him and make him so lofty,” Hamilton says. “The whole idea of the fringe is that it really gives people the opportunity to sit back and laugh at him.

“With the fringe element we can just play, we have all the license to do it, and people have a really good time.”

Hamilton has already received over a dozen submissions from playwrights interested in participating in future Shakespeare on the Fringe Festivals. Among these is a timely farce that pits Shakespeare’s famously depressed Dane against a ne’er-do-well reptile from the phylum sci-fi–Hamlet Meets Godzilla.

Of his own venture into the fringe, Hamilton says modestly, “It’s really nothing serious–it’s just bubble gum.”

But a grand oral exercise just the same, thou lumpish folly-fallen canker-blossom!

No Holds Bard, or Shakespeare’s Maximum Insults at the Sonoma Valley Shakespeare Festival’s Shakespeare on the Fringe Festival plays at 6:30 p.m., June 21 to Sept. 25, at the Gundlach-Bundschu Winery, 3775 Thornsberry Road, Sonoma. Tickets are $10-$18. 575-3854. Script submissions to the Shakespeare on the Fringe Festivals should be mailed with a self-addressed-stamped envelope to Fringe, C/O Sonoma Valley Shakespeare Festival, Attention: Carl Hamilton, Artistic Director, P.O. Box 727, Sonoma, CA 95476.

From the June 18-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Spins

0

Homegrown


James Michin III

Mother nature’s child: Megan McElroy

Local artists showcased on new CDs

Megan McElroy
Buzz (Leave My ReMark Music)

MEGAN MCELROY’S music–playful, literate, delightfully inventive jazz-folk-blues songs of womyn-centered politics and lesbian love–are quite intentionally “not for everybody.” Not that the Santa Rosan is short of fans; McElroy’s electrifying, anything-goes live shows have won her a vast and loyal following throughout the county and beyond. Now the raw exhibitionist exuberance of those performances has been captured in McElroy’s first studio CD. Produced by women’s music pioneer June Millington, Buzz nicely showcases McElroy’s powerful guitar playing and her trademark scale-defying vocals. Especially good are the heart-stoppingly erotic “Sticky Fingers” and the tongue-tangling delight of “Court Jester”.
David Templeton

Ruminators
Wild West (Jackalope Records)

Rachel Tree
Water of Life (RT Productions)

AS THEIR NAME IMPLIES, the six-year span since their first CD release has given the Ruminators plenty of time to ponder the songs that make up this fine album. Unhurried and acoustic-based, the superb production by leader Greg Scherer, Doug Jayne, and Jeff Martin (of Joanne Rand’s Little Band) allows Scherer’s compositions to gently move the pure air on which they seem to float. Jennifer Goudeau shares vocals with Scherer, with instrumental assistance from Spiral Bound’s Terry Ann Gillette, former Hijinks’ Chip Dunbar and Ted Dutcher, Jim Hurley, and Rob Stinnett, among the collaborators. With Celtic roots planted firmly in American soil, their genuine sound reflects the cross-pollination of the contemporary folk-music scene, from countrified to Parisian cafe jazz. Meanwhile, singer Rachel Tree makes her debut with the Little Big Band rhythm section. Her earnest, wide-eyed vocals and organic songs pitch her in the New Sincerity camp of artists. Zero guitarist Steve Kimock and Terry Keady lend their talents on a couple of cuts to ensure all is solid on the musical front.
Terry Hansen

James K
A Giggle Can Wiggle Its Way Through a Wall (Rivertown)

Jim O’Grady
We Gotta Start Summer! (College Street)

A GIGGLE CAN WIGGLE … is a strong debut from Petaluma children’s music performer James K, a talented singer-songwriter working in the vein of Peter Alsop and Tim Cain, and offering powerful self-esteeming messages in a playful setting. These mostly original folk-oriented songs–melodically catchy enough for preschoolers and kindergartners, and lyrically sophisticated enough for kids up to sixth grade–have struck a chord in young hearts among local schoolchildren. Kid tested, kid approved. Meanwhile, local kiddie music star Jim O’Grady has released his third CD, a collection of hummable pop songs that touch on favorite children’s themes, including “I’m Not Made for Homework” and the timely “Summertime Is the Best.”
Greg Cahill

Vince Welnick
Vince Welnick & Missing Man Formation (Grateful Dead Records/Arista)

SONOMA COUNTY resident Vince Welnick, Grateful Dead keyboardist from 1990 to 1995, came close to becoming missing-in-action, sinking into a deep depression after the death of guitarist Jerry Garcia from which he thought he might never emerge. Enter Zero guitarist Steve Kimock (recently recruited by Dead members Weir, Lesh, and Hart into the Other Ones), who beckoned Welnick to Kene Eberhard’s Studio E in Sebastopol, where he was joined by bassist Bobby Vega and ex-Tubes drummer Prairie Prince in the original version of MMF. They launched into a series of live studio shows that are the genesis of this CD, with overdubs added later by a new version of the band. Some murkiness occurs from this process, but the CD benefits from Welnick’s charged vocals and accomplished ensemble performances.
T.H.

Rhythmtown Jive
On The Main Stem (Globe Records)

WITH FORMER Lost Planet Airman, bassist, and bandleader Tim Esch-liman calling Petaluma home, this veteran Bay Area band has been appearing with increasing frequency at local venues. Their seasoned brew of R&B has seen two previous releases, but it’s this album that will hoist their recognition factor, with the effervescent presence of Chuck Berry’s piano-man Johnnie Johnson on seven of the 12 cuts. Still, it’s very much the Jive’s show as Johnson blends seamlessly on original tunes (three by Johnson himself) and well-chosen covers, running the gamut from jump and boogie to straight-ahead blues.
T.H.

The Bill Horvitz Band
Dust Devil (Music & Arts)

SEBASTOPOL JAZZ GUITARIST Bill Horvitz, saxophonist and flautist Steve Adams (probably best known for his work with the critically acclaimed ROVA Saxophone Quartet), and drummer Joseph Sabella create rhythmically edgy improvisations that range from the multilayered opening track “Busy Mind” to the free-metal composition “Tic.” Horvitz’s fret work– frequently built around short, moody bass lines–is reminiscent of the late avant-jazz guitarist Sonny Sharrock. This adventurous ensemble is well versed in the groundbreaking modern jazz of John Zorn, Arto Linsey, and other fusionists. Horvitz shows a lot of maturity as a bandleader by creating a framework in which Adams can really stretch out.
Greg Cahill

Various Artists
That Mean Ol’ El Niño (Blue Jake Music)

A SINGLE-SONG CD that benefits the victims of the recent Rio Nido mud slide disaster, this rockin’ little tune boasts a landslide of local musicians and recording specialists in a total charity production. Doug Offenbacher penned the lyrics, piano-man Stu Blank composed the music, sang, and produced. this CD epitomizes Sonoma County’s cooperative musical spirit.
T.H.

From the June 18-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Merlot

0

Mellow Merlot


Michael Amsler

Well red: Strategic aging can be a hit-or-miss proposition, though some vintage merlots are highly rated.

On the fine art of aging gracefully

By Bob Johnson

THE ADJECTIVE most commonly associated with merlot, especially among alliteration addicts, is mellow. Most merlots on the market today are ready to drink, so the idea of laying down a bottle on one’s wine rack for additional “mellowing” seldom is given a first thought, let alone a second.

We know that a majority of cabernet sauvignons benefit from a year or two (and sometimes more) of rack or cellar time, but is the same true of merlot? A recent vertical tasting of a dozen Louis M. Martini Winery merlots from the inaugural 1968/70 bottling to the just-released 25th-anniversary 1995 edition provided some clues.

While Martini is a Napa Valley winery, it almost always has secured the grapes for its merlot program from Sonoma County vineyards. It was true of the 1968/70 release, a blend of two vintages from the Healdsburg Vineyard, and it’s true of the 25th-anniversary bottling, which carries a Russian River Valley designation. Of the four vineyards owned by the Martini family today, two are in Sonoma County: Monte Rosso, which hugs Highway 12 just north of Sonoma, and Los Vinedos del Rio, situated just south of Healdsburg in the Russian River Valley. The latter is the source of Martini’s premium merlot grapes.

The 1968/70 bottling generally is acknowledged as the first varietal merlot made and marketed in America. Louis Martini planted merlot to blend with his cabernet sauvignon, and because there was such a small crop in 1968–not nearly enough for the winery’s cabernet program–he aged it in neutral cooperage and then blended it with merlot from the 1970 vintage.

Five hundred cases of the 1968/70 merlot were released, and the wine sold for $3.50 a bottle–1/10 the asking price of the 25th-anniversary edition.

Ready-to-drink merlots.

THAT ANY FRUIT FLAVORS remain in the ’68/’70–a wine that is old and tired but still kicking–speaks volumes about merlot’s aging potential. It certainly has seen better days, yet it remains drinkable, flavorful, and, yes, enjoyable. But when it comes to other “mature” merlots, keep in mind the definition of potential; we’re talking about what could be, not necessarily what will be.

Martini’s 1973 California Mountain bottling, for instance, was extremely light and somewhat raisiny in the nose despite being three years younger than the ’68/’70. And the 1979 California merlot was overly herbal and warm on the back end even though it possessed an alluring mulberry aroma.

“The wines which age the best are balanced wines,” says Michael Martini, who has been Martini’s winemaker since 1977. “That means not too much oak and not too much winemaker intervention, which allows the fruit flavors to evolve. When you can still taste fruit in an older merlot, that’s a balanced wine.”

All wines sampled from the 1987 vintage onward were drinking well … some very well … but the two most recent releases, the 1994 and ’95, were the most complex, delicious, and satisfying wines by far.

Conclusion: While merlot may evolve over time and remain both drinkable and enjoyable, strategic aging appears to be a hit-and-miss proposition. And since most merlots taste wonderful when they hit store shelves, why risk having them endure the ravages of time?

Remember, it’s always better to drink a wine a little too soon than a little too late.

From the June 18-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

The Scoop

P&G + FDA = BS

Another modest nutritional proposal

By Bob Harris

ALMOST TWO YEARS AGO, this column detailed my personal experiences with Olestra, the new fat substitute now used in fried snack foods (“Betcha Can’t Excrete Just One,” July 23, 1996).

At the time, hundreds of doctors were expressing grave concern about the product’s safety. Olestra has no calories largely because the molecule is so huge that the body has no idea what it is and wisely disposes of it as waste. Rather quickly. Leading to nausea, diarrhea, and even worse stuff that’s so gross I won’t go into it. On the way out, Olestra also binds to a class of disease-fighting nutrients in your bloodstream called carotenoids–beta-carotene is the best-known example–so the net effect is to remove nutrients, not add them.

And keep in mind that the stuff’s sold as a healthy alternative.

Intrepid reporter that I am, I decided to sample these Ex-Lax Potato Leeches for myself. Back in 1996, chips with the new goo were test-marketed in only three small towns, hundreds of miles away from competent product-liability attorneys, so on a trip through Grand Junction, Colo., I became one of the very first Americans to sample the effects of Olestra.

OK, fast forward to the present. The FDA approved the glop, but only after demanding the addition of a bunch of vitamins that might replace some of the stuff being pulled out of you, and also insisting on a warning label linking Olestra to everything from anal leakage to the Kennedy assassination.

Fine print notwithstanding, Olestra is now widely available, most notably as the fat substitute in Frito-Lay’s Wow Chips, so named presumably because “Urrrrrggghhh” was already taken.

However, the Center for Science in the Public Interest insists that long-term use of Olestra causes a lot more discomfort than Procter & Gamble admits, and eventually may cause thousands of cancers nationwide. At a recent news conference, Dr. Walter Willett, head of the Department of Nutrition at Harvard’s School of Public Health, stated that several studies correlate decreased carotenoids with increased cancers, and “even the amount of Olestra in a small, one-ounce bag of potato chips will lower blood carotenoids by over 50 percent if consumed on a daily basis.”

For its part, Procter & Gamble admits that Olestra passes through you undigested and bonds to fat-soluble vitamins, but claims it’s nothing to worry about. In P&G’s words, “There are still scientists that disagree … . There is no study that has shown conclusively that carotenoids have any effect on health.”

The tobacco guys said roughly the same thing for decades: As long as there are scientists who disagree (some of whom happen to be on their payroll), there’s no reason to listen to the head nutrition guy at Harvard.

Maybe P&G is listening to the cash registers instead. Wow chips, marketed as a healthy, low-fat product, are selling at the rate of over a million dollars’ worth a day. At this rate, the Harvard guy estimates that the United States will experience between 2,000 and 9,800 excess cases of prostate cancer; 32,000 excess cases of heart disease; 1,400 to 7,400 excess cases of lung cancer; and 80 to 390 excess cases of blindness.

THE FDA is now reviewing Olestra again. The CSPI wants the FDA to withdraw approval of the glop, make people like Frito-Lay stop selling the chips as “fat free,” or at least strengthen the warning labels to include more stuff about cancer, blindness, and maybe Watergate or Iran-Contra.

Don’t get your hopes up. The FDA has reportedly received over 5,000 letters from people whose Olestra experiences were generally similar to mine: eating one bag of chips and then having to Squeeze the Charmin for their very lives.

But even so, the folks at the FDA also say they haven’t seen anything that would cause them to change their minds.Oh really? Apparently what they’re asking for here is a visual aid.

OK, fine. As alert reader Robert Burns (not the poet, unless AOL is now extending its 50-hour free trials to dead people) suggests, let’s take the FDA at its word. Next time you suffer adverse side effects from consuming Olestra, maybe the best thing to do is simply place those adverse side effects in a sealed container and send them directly to the FDA.

After all, fair’s fair. It’s nothing the government doesn’t give us all the time anyway.

From the June 18-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Elizabeth Wurtzel

Yada Yada



Wurtzel’s ‘Bitch’ an uncertain manifesto

By Traci Hukill

IF ELIZABETH WURTZEL’S luck holds, this year’s $64 million pop-culture question will be: Is the cover of Bitch (Doubleday; $23.95), the young author’s feminist follow-up to Prozac Nation, keenly ironic or just a witless attempt at sass? There’s no doubt that it’s a marketing coup. Wurtzel’s svelte, naked babehood (with nipple Photo-shopped out), the manicured hand that lazily flips the reader off, and the bored sneer on her delicate face have won this book unusually widespread attention.

But how those features relate to a philosophy separate from Katie Roiphe’s and Naomi Wolf’s “do-me” style of seduction-as-power-grab feminism remains unclear, muddled by Wurtzel’s intellectual confusion and hyperventilating prose. Wurtzel says that feminism has failed us, or at least got us stuck between an ideological rock and a desirable hard place, but this book’s frustrated rants, uncertain message, and simpering conclusion don’t help to point the way free.

Wurtzel is certainly capable enough. She’s smart, observant, educated, and remarkably adept with language. But she’s grappling with a complex problem–how women can get their emotional needs met without bringing on themselves the wrath of God, the media, men, and other women–armed with a myopic strategy, one too focused on a coterie of starlets and professional brats.

The introduction, “Manufacturing Fascination” (an apparent reference to MIT media critic Noam Chomsky’s Manufacturing Consent), concludes with a thesis statement: “This is a book about women who wrote and write their own operating manuals, written in the hope that the world may someday be a safer place for them, or for us, for all women.”

What follows is a who’s who of history’s bad girls–Delilah, Amy Fisher, Anne Sexton, Courtney Love–their apologies penned by Wurtzel herself, interspersed with stories of victims no less famous than Sylvia Plath, Princess Di, and Nicole Brown. Most are excused for their mistakes, tantrums, and marriages and then molded into examples of how the world punishes “brilliant creatures who shine”– except for Hillary Clinton, whom Wurtzel lambastes for not demanding a salary and for ignoring Bill’s indiscretions. However, the author simultaneously praises her for having “succeeded [at marriage] where so many others have failed or given up or snapped.”

Others–Paula Jones and Pamela Harriman most notably–Wurtzel shreds, and her litmus test for who merits exoneration and who deserves public humiliation defies analysis.

If Wurtzel’s logic suffers unnerving mood swings, her brilliant but manic writing should be committed. Pretentious and obfuscating allusions to history and popular culture, parallel-structure sentences that ramble on for most of a page, too many personal confessions, and a bad habit of prefacing her opinions with the word look, as in “Look, I think many people have rescued themselves from this game,” bespeak the mistaken notion that people are privileged to read her self-absorbed, stream-of-consciousness meandering through difficult intellectual territory.

It’s like having a precocious 13-year-old at the dinner table: She may be clever, she may even be right, but her constant need to interject herself impedes the conversation’s progress.

And that may be the book’s biggest flaw: Wurtzel is annoying. In spite of her astounding mastery of history and her unwillingness to shrink from the truth about where feminism has left women, her voice sounds too young and unseasoned to trust. Even the litany of her naughty escapades–screwing an Italian tattoo artist, snorting heroin, screwing a man twice her age, snorting coke–smacks of smugness, not depth and wealth of experience and sorrow of the sort that makes people speak quietly and honestly.

In the final chapter she lets slip a glimmer of humanitarianism: “And [forgiveness over vengeance] has to be the guiding principle, it is the only chance any of us has for happiness.” But that’s a half page from the end, and the rest of that chapter is Wurtzel dissolving into despair that she’ll be old and unmarried, or else explaining how that would be fine with her–she says both–and so ultimately the forgiveness schtick just seems like so much theater.

Once disciplined and experienced, Wurtzel will be amazing. Until then, readers will need patience and occasionally the help of a good dictionary.

From the June 18-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Sustainable Development

Crash Course


Antonin Kartochvil

You don’t need a weatherman … : The founders of the 30-year-old Gaviotas experimental settlement in Colombia have proven the viabilty of sustainable communities.

Can sustainable development put the brakes on environmental smash-up?

By Patrick Sullivan

THE LYRICAL SOUND of a woman’s voice fills the dark forest. Tentative at first, then swelling to a full-throated tune, the song rises up between the branches as a full moon shines overhead. Soon, an angelic aria echoes throughout one of the strangest places on Earth: a South American forest that stands where once, not very long ago, there were only empty acres of sun-baked plains.

Windmills, solar panels, and, most important, a new way of looking at the world have brought thriving life here to one of the harshest places on the planet. That momentous change has been wrought by the small village of Gaviotas, a unique experimental settlement in Colombia dedicated to the creation of a sustainable environmental future. The opera singer, the forest, the potent little town: All figure in Alan Weisman’s magical–but definitely non-fictional–new book, Gaviotas: A Village to Reinvent the World (Chelsea Green; $22.95).

More than mere music is being made in this remote corner of the world–a vision of the future is also taking shape. The issue that Gaviotas confronts head-on is a question with which the whole world is grappling: How can the human race survive and prosper in a world of increasingly obvious environmental limits?

Some folks think that Sonoma County could learn some valuable lessons from the Gaviotas experience–and the insights of other sustainable development theorists. The New College of California is bringing Weisman and several other thinkers and writers to its Santa Rosa campus in coming weeks for a series of talks about development and the environment.

But what, exactly, is sustainable development? The term, after all, is on the lips of nearly everyone these days, from Green Party activists to oil company spokespersons. Are they all really speaking the same language? “The term ‘sustainability’ has been corrupted and co-opted in a lot of ways,” says local environmentalist Susan Hancock. “It obviously does not mean the same thing to everyone.”

Hancock belongs to an organization called Sustainable Sonoma County, formed recently in response to what Hancock believes are disturbing trends. She deplores the development of wild lands, the endless construction of new roads, the growing problems of water scarcity and pollution.

Most environmentalists know what sustainable development is not. But saying what it is, well, there’s the rub. Agreeing on a common vision of our environmental future is tough. Even Hancock says her group is still mulling over their ideas.

One speaker in the New College series believes a consensus about sustainability is more than possible–it’s happening right now. Michael Schuman, author of Going Local (Simon & Schuster; $25), thinks something new looms on the American political horizon. Where others see a huge chasm between environmentalists and business leaders, Schuman sees growing agreement on the perils of the global economy.

“I think that gap is being bridged,” Schuman says. “And it’s being bridged in part by the heads of local chambers of commerce who staked their reputation on going global in the 1980s and who got burned by doing so.”

SCHUMAN’S BOOK, bristling with academic references, portrays the emerging global economy as the greatest threat to our environment. In a world where businesses can relocate at the drop of a hat, local communities plagued by environmental problems often find themselves in a bidding war to relax regulations on air pollution and alternative energy.

Schuman documents a grotesque situation in which American cities become locked in competition with some of the poorest countries for factories that provide jobs and a tax base. For instance, northern Mexico swells with low-wage, high-polluting factories while American cities fill up with the working poor, thrown out of decent jobs by mobile international businesses.

“Any effort to raise labor and environmental standards will get you nowhere unless you deal with the question of ownership,” Schuman says. “If you look at most prescriptions that are put forward by environmental and labor groups, they only deal with the how of production. They don’t deal with who owns the means of production, and that problem is fundamental.”

Hmm … the means of production? In case you’re starting to think Schuman might be a Marxist, think again. “We are basically a country that’s governed by free enterprise,” Schuman says with an air of finality. “And I think free enterprise will either save or destroy this country.”

So what’s the solution? Going Local argues that communities must establish local control over their businesses and their environment. That doesn’t mean government ownership–an idea that makes Schuman nearly shudder with revulsion. It does mean nurturing local entrepreneurs and producing for local consumption. The more firmly a business is based in a community, the more control that community has over the environment.

For an example, Schuman turns to football. As Bay Area fans know quite well, major league teams have enormous clout with local governments. After all, if the team doesn’t get what it wants, there is always a more compliant city around the corner. But there is one pro-football team that will never relocate: the Green Bay Packers. Why not? Because, in a unique arrangement, thousands of Green Bay citizens own stock in the team, with no one owning more than 20 shares. So Wisconsin’s Packers are in Green Bay to stay.

“You’re talking to someone who has never really understood the football mania of this country,” Schuman says with a laugh. “But now I’m a Cheesehead, too.”

From Green Bay, we turn back to Gaviotas. Local control is the name of the game there also, for Gaviotas is not some utopian project sponsored by U.S. environmentalists or set up by the World Bank. This unique village is actually the brainchild of one of Colombia’s most unusual citizens, a man named Paolo Lugari.

The troubled nation of Colombia has a fearsome international reputation. We know it as a place of drugs, violence, and civil war. But somehow, in this seething cauldron, Gaviotas has survived and even prospered. In the 1970s, Lugari had grown tired of working for his government on traditional development projects. He’d fallen in love with the vast landscape of Colombia’s eastern savanna. It was a harsh environment, but Lugari saw it as the perfect place to test new ways of living lightly on the earth.

Now, some 30 years later, Gaviotas has brought profound changes to the area. Lugari’s scientists and thinkers have invented new wells that bring fresh water from deep beneath the earth using only the power of human hands. They have generated power with innovative windmills that harness even the slightest of tropical breezes. They have built a viable community. And they’ve done it all, says Weisman, in a way that might seem very odd to suburban Americans.

“One of the strangest things about Gaviotas is that you almost never hear a machine,” Weisman says. “Sure, sometimes a vehicle will pass through. But most of the time, what you are hearing are the voices of nature– the wind, the rain, the birds.”

All this was accomplished in large measure because Lugari was able to convince many talented Colombians that Gaviotas was an excellent place to invest their creative energy. University students, scientists, engineers, even opera singers took the long, dangerous trip out to this place and helped discover innovative ways to make human settlement possible with minimal environmental impact.

THE RESULT is an oasis of serenity in one of the most violent places on Earth. Even terrifying visits from soldiers and guerrillas cannot disrupt the peace for long. As the rest of Colombia has descended into hellish violence, Weisman says, Gaviotas has remained a place where little children walk down the street alone at night, without fear.

“My god, where on Earth do you ever see that anymore?” Weisman asks. “Where do you see people so absolutely unafraid?”

So, you might be asking, where do we sign up? Is there any chance of another Gaviotas opening around the corner? Weisman sees no reason why similar communities couldn’t exist in Northern California or elsewhere in the United States. In fact, he points to communities like Eco-Village, located near downtown Los Angeles, as examples of other people living out the Gaviotas philosophy.

Convincing governments, however, that they should back the Gaviotas approach has not been easy. But in a world that is coming to question development models that focus on pavement and pesticides, the simple but effective answers provided by this Colombian village look increasingly attractive.

“Is there a better development model out there?” Weisman asks. “I think the answer, provided by Gaviotas, is clearly yes.”

The New College series on sustainability issues continues through Monday, June 29. Alan Weisman speaks on Monday, June 22, at 7:30 p.m. Michael Schuman speaks on Monday, June 29, at 7:30 p.m. Other speakers include Helena Norberg-Hodge, Green Party gubernatorial candidate Dan Hamburg, David Heitmiller, and Jacqueline Blix. All talks take place on the New College of California campus, 99 Sixth St., Santa Rosa. Admission is $3-$5. 568-0112.

From the June 18-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Medeski, Martin, & Wood

0

Funkin’ Groovin’


Jimmy Katz

Jazzmatazz: Medeski, Martin, & Wood slip into the Mystic Theater.

Medeski, Martin, & Wood play jazz you can dance to

By Bruce Robinson

IF WE GET a basic feel for something,” says Billy Martin, drummer for the funky jazz trio Medeski, Martin, & Wood, “we start to work on a bit of form and shaping it. That can happen in the studio or over a few months on the road. It’s always evolving.

“It’s never written down in detail because we’re always changing the music, trying to express different things.”

That has been apparent from the beginning, as their debut recording, 1992’s Notes from the Underground, served notice that Medeski, Martin, & Wood were ready to include in the group’s musical mix most anything they ever had heard. Elements of funk, hip-hop, blues, avant garde, and rock all melded into an intensely rhythmic stew that immediately won critical attention.

More recently, the band has shown a willingness to go anywhere–even if it means stepping out of the spotlight–to explore those musical interests. After seven years together–during which they have recorded five highly regarded albums (as well as the funky Get Shorty film score), played uncounted club and concert dates, and reaped a trunk full of glowing reviews–Martin, keyboardist John Medeski, and bassist Chris Wood found themselves in an unfamiliar role last fall.

The acclaimed trio sat in as the hand-picked sidemen for celebrated jazz guitarist John Scofield on his recently released A Go-Go (Blue Note).

“John called us up and asked us to play on his next record,” Martin relates, “and we thought it would be a good idea.”

The shift into supporting roles on another artist’s songs and arrangements “wasn’t awkward, it was quite natural, just like getting together with any musician and making music,” he adds. “We were there, trying to help him express his music in our way. It was really just a matter of playing together, rehearsing a little bit, and putting it on tape.”

Though different than their recent collective work, this was nothing new for the threesome. “We grew up playing with people who always put charts in front of us,” Martin shrugs. “We’re all musicians who are eager to play and share ideas with other musicians.”

And that has not changed. In fact, Martin says, he is as open as ever to further outside collaborations. “Anybody who has an interesting story to tell, I would be more than happy to work with them.”

It was that same openness that brought the trio together in the first place. All three were active in the New York-to-New England jazz circuit, and they knew one another by reputation first. “I had heard about John and Chris, they’d heard about me, and we eventually crossed paths and decided to hang out and play,” Martin recalls. “We played and it felt logical, like everything was possible. And we got along as friends, so it was an instant hookup.”

WITH MARTIN’S crisp and varied drumming anchoring Wood’s melodic bass work, and Medeski’s fluid keyboards–especially the fat Hammond B-3 sound–fleshing out the harmonics, the threesome quickly gained a reputation for grafting wide-ranging jazz improvisations onto a deeply funky set of grooves.

And while he is unquestionably the keeper of the beat, Martin insists the creation of the groove is not just his contribution.

“The drummer is always expected to be able to play a good dance beat, which I’m always striving for,” he says, “but the rhythm comes from John and Chris, too.”

So it’s scarcely surprising to hear Martin tick off a list of influences that begins with master jazz drummers like Roy Haynes, Max Roach, and Elvin Jones, but quickly branches out to include Zigaboo Modeliste of the Meters, as well as 20th-century American composers Charles Ives and John Cage. “All that stuff has an influence,” he says. “I hear rhythms and textures and melodies in everything.”

Those omnipresent influences have continued to manifest in Medeski, Martin, & Wood’s recordings, including the forthcoming Combustication, which is due out from Blue Note toward the end of the summer. Unlike their previous disc, Shack-Man, which was cut in the remote Hawaiian studio that inspired its name, the new set was recorded in New York City, and is informed by the urban edge of that environment, as well as the relatively generous amount of time the threesome had to prepare it.

“We spent more time in the studio, using the studio like an instrument to help bring the music to another level,” Martin says. “We experimented a lot more, improvised a lot more. “

As for the new material, “A lot of it is spontaneous compositions,” he explains.

One way the group has stretched its stylistic boundaries is by recording the same set of compositions with two engineers of distinctly differing philosophies. “One had more of a hip-hop approach and the other had more of a chamber music approach,” Martin recalls, contrasting those approaches as “capturing the magic of the moment,” compared with “getting an almost crystal-clear natural sound.”

Somewhat surprisingly, “they ended up sounding pretty cohesive,” he laughs.

With those sessions wrapped, the threesome is back on the road. “Touring is always a priority,” Martin says simply, “because playing live is what we do.”

Medeski, Martin, & Wood perform Tuesday, June 16, at 8 p.m. at the Mystic Theater, 21 Petaluma Blvd. N., Petaluma. Tickets are $18.50. For details, call 765-6665.

From the June 11-17, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Job Hunting Online

Net-Working

The Internet helps take some of the drudgery out of job-hunting

By Rene Iwaszkiewicz

THE PARTY’S OVER. That’s right, smarty-pants. You graduated from college. Now it’s time to get a job and start paying off those student loans, or get off the dole from mom and dad. Lucky for you, today’s job market couldn’t be better.

“The job market for college grads is outstanding,” says Camille Luckenbaugh, director of employment information of the National Association of Colleges and Employers, adding that this year’s grads “very well may be enjoying the best year this decade.”

According to the NACE, the hiring of new graduates is expected to rise 19.1 percent. Now, you could go job-hunting the old-fashioned way: clipping newspaper ads, sending out scads of résumés, and pounding shoe leather. But you’re a child of the ’90s, and you figure that, like everything else, this can be done from the comfort of home by using your computer and the Internet. You’re right … kind of.

For instance, the Internet can help desperate grads track down job listings in another state or worldwide, find information on companies before an interview, exchange information with professionals in another field, allow you to share information with specialty user groups online, and post your résumé on job-search sites, says Susan Epstein, assistant librarian at Florida State University.

“I found it helpful to find out where the jobs were,” says Tara Holt, a graduating senior at the University of Connecticut in Storrs. “You can look through the classified sections of newspapers on the Internet to find jobs nationally, not just in a specific area.”

If used correctly, the Internet also can save time and broaden a job search, says Epstein. The Internet is a plus as well for those whose schedules don’t fit career-service-center hours. Through the Internet, you can locate unusual or hard-to-find information and communicate with people or resource groups in specialized areas. You can also post a résumé on various job-search networks. There are also career service centers on the Internet.

MOST BUSINESSES, for example, now have their own homepages, offering a quick and easy way to learn more about the companies. In addition, most company homepages contain job advertisements listed at the bottom of each site. They also contain e-mail addresses for contact people within a company. Search engines such as Yahoo, Lycos, or Metacrawler can help find homepages for career service sites or company sites by using keywords such as “jobs,” “headhunters,” or company names. Many online career service centers have listings of helpful job-search sites or of links to them.

There are also numerous job-search sites specific to certain groups and professional fields. These sites include job listings, job market projections, résumé and interviewing tips, and even have online experts who can help you define career goals. If one site doesn’t have what you’re looking, there are often links to other sites.

The big question, however, is this: How well do the Internet job-search sites work? Not surprisingly, those with sites on the net tout its successes. In March the Monster Board, an Internet job-search site containing a large interactive database for listing and locating job opportunities, put out a report conducted by the Advertising Research Corporation stating, “One out of every four job seekers who apply for a job through the Monster Board receives a job offer, and those receiving an offer receive an average of three offers each.” The typical visitor to The Monster Board is between the ages of 24 and 49, with an even split between female and male users, and 72 percent have a college degree.

Sites such as JobDirect, which started three years ago in Stamford, Conn., also helps undergrads and graduate students find jobs through the Web, says Rachel Bell, co-founder of JobDirect. The site offers two features: résumé posting and job listing. Once a résumé is posted, the student’s job interests are matched every 24 hours to employers’ requests. So far, students have posted about 80,000 résumés. While the company has no figures on how many students have received jobs through the site, participating companies range from the Peace Corps to Random House and Intel.

Jobtrack is another potentially helpful site for college students and alumni. Jobtrack works with university career centers and employers. Employers send job listings to colleges that are posted online by the campus career centers. Most universities allow students and alumni access to the site by using a password. You specify your search by keywords and place of interest and then send your résumé to the place of your choice. The site also allows you to post your résumé and network with participating alumni.

“I used Jobtrack and sent my résumés to numerous companies in the area,” says Laurie Scata, a ’96 University of Connecticut grad. “I heard from companies and set up interviews.”

Despite its potential benefits, the Internet also can be a waste of time, according to Epstein. “It sounds like you can post your résumé and get jobs, and that’s not the case,” she says, adding that the many of the sites on the Web offer “high expectation and low results.” Because the Internet works like a giant newspaper, it’s important to remember that not everything appears on the Internet.

Information may be dated, and there is no guarantee that posting or sending your résumé is enough. Epstein says job-seekers should still call the companies and talk with the Human Resources Department to make sure a résumé was received and try to set up an interview. She says it’s important to network, talk to people, and inquire about jobs. Many great jobs aren’t advertised, she says, adding that finding information about jobs on the Internet requires time, research, and critical evaluation skills.

“The Web is useless,” says Jeff DuBois, who graduated in 1997. “There’s so much information on the Web it’s difficult to find the information you’re looking for. It’s time-consuming. For psychology or photography, there were no job listings for the Connecticut area on the Web.”

Bottom line, the Internet is only one tool and certainly should not be the only resource used. The Web cannot replace human contact through networking and interviewing. “The best way to find a job is through connections, human connections,” DuBois says. “It’s who you know.”

From the June 11-17, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Utah Phillips

State's ManUtah Phillips stays close to his rootsBy Bruce RobinsonHE WASN'T BORN THERE, but Bruce "Utah" Phillips has chosen to be known professionally for the state in which he came of age, a wide-open slice of the West he continues to regard as his home. It was there he developed the leftist political perspective that shaped his subsequent activities...

Ready-to-drink Merlot

Ready RedsLOOKING for a ready-to-drink merlot for tonight's dinner? The following Sonoma County bottlings, (rated on a scale of one to four corks, with one being average and four sublime) won't disappoint. Ferrari-Carano 1995, Sonoma County A deep core of blackberry, cassis, and cedar with a hint of dill in a nicely balanced, flavorful wine. 4 corks.Louis M. Martini...

No Holds Bard

Edgy BardMichael AmslerSaucy knaves: Jacqueline Zahos, left, Rebecca Allington, and Bill Killinger take a ride on Shakespeare's wild side in 'No Holds Bard', part of the Sonoma Valley Shakespeare Festival.New Fringe Festival delivers Shakespeare's maximum insultsBy Daedalus HowellA PESTILENT GALL to me!" Shakespeare's King Lear barks when his pugnacious fool recites a particularly ribald aphorism--a devilish number comparing truth...

Spins

HomegrownJames Michin IIIMother nature's child: Megan McElroyLocal artists showcased on new CDs Megan McElroyBuzz (Leave My ReMark Music)MEGAN MCELROY'S music--playful, literate, delightfully inventive jazz-folk-blues songs of womyn-centered politics and lesbian love--are quite intentionally "not for everybody." Not that the Santa Rosan is short of fans; McElroy's electrifying, anything-goes live shows have won her a vast and loyal following...

Merlot

Mellow MerlotMichael AmslerWell red: Strategic aging can be a hit-or-miss proposition, though some vintage merlots are highly rated. On the fine art of aging gracefullyBy Bob JohnsonTHE ADJECTIVE most commonly associated with merlot, especially among alliteration addicts, is mellow. Most merlots on the market today are ready to drink, so the idea of laying down a bottle on one's...

The Scoop

P&G + FDA = BSAnother modest nutritional proposal By Bob Harris ALMOST TWO YEARS AGO, this column detailed my personal experiences with Olestra, the new fat substitute now used in fried snack foods ("Betcha Can't Excrete Just One," July 23, 1996). At the time, hundreds of doctors were expressing grave concern about the product's safety. Olestra has...

Elizabeth Wurtzel

Yada YadaWurtzel's 'Bitch' an uncertain manifestoBy Traci HukillIF ELIZABETH WURTZEL'S luck holds, this year's $64 million pop-culture question will be: Is the cover of Bitch (Doubleday; $23.95), the young author's feminist follow-up to Prozac Nation, keenly ironic or just a witless attempt at sass? There's no doubt that it's a marketing coup. Wurtzel's svelte, naked babehood (with nipple...

Sustainable Development

Crash CourseAntonin KartochvilYou don't need a weatherman ... : The founders of the 30-year-old Gaviotas experimental settlement in Colombia have proven the viabilty of sustainable communities.Can sustainable development put the brakes on environmental smash-up?By Patrick SullivanTHE LYRICAL SOUND of a woman's voice fills the dark forest. Tentative at first, then swelling to a full-throated tune, the song rises up...

Medeski, Martin, & Wood

Funkin' Groovin'Jimmy KatzJazzmatazz: Medeski, Martin, & Wood slip into the Mystic Theater.Medeski, Martin, & Wood play jazz you can dance toBy Bruce RobinsonIF WE GET a basic feel for something," says Billy Martin, drummer for the funky jazz trio Medeski, Martin, & Wood, "we start to work on a bit of form and shaping it. That can happen in...

Job Hunting Online

Net-WorkingThe Internet helps take some of the drudgery out of job-huntingBy Rene IwaszkiewiczTHE PARTY'S OVER. That's right, smarty-pants. You graduated from college. Now it's time to get a job and start paying off those student loans, or get off the dole from mom and dad. Lucky for you, today's job market couldn't be better. "The job market for...
11,084FansLike
4,606FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow