Frank Black

0


Beach Boys On Acid: Frank Black prays with the Catholics.

In the Black

Ex-Pixies honcho Frank Black rocks on

By Greg Cahill

Beck once said in an interview that every song is like its own nation. Ex-Pixies kingpin Frank Black would agree: “It has its own laws,” he explains during a phone call from his Los Angeles home. “I really think that’s true–they come out the way they come out. I’m really just delivering the next batch of songs, whether people like that or not. I almost don’t have any control over it.” Sounds mystical, but the recent batches of songs out of the blue have served this alt-rock innovator well since forming his current band a half decade ago or so.

Indeed, Frank Black and the Catholics (SpinArt), released in 1998, garnered rave reviews for the singer, songwriter, and guitarist whom Rolling Stone once credited with fronting “the quintessential college rockers.” Black’s band, the Pixies, were a major influence on Kurt Cobain and the alt-rock revolution that followed Nirvana’s 1991 pop-chart ascendancy. It’s “the kind of weirdo rock that inspired 1,000 bands to call themselves ‘alternative,'” the Philadelphia City Paper opined about the rocker’s return to form. “Black invents and takes risks but stays true to his sound.”

And what a sound. Seductive pop melodies. Balls-to-the-wall surf riffs (“like the Beach Boys on acid,” a critic once noted). Otherworldly lyrics. Black’s deranged shrieks. Primal anarchy at its best.

“Even though I try not to read reviews,” admits the reclusive Black, “it’s good to know there are some good ones out there.”

The thing that’s gotten those jaded rock critics so excited is that Black–who has been slammed in the past for overproducing otherwise sublime neopsychedelic fare–has opted of late for a raw, stripped-down approach that lends a spontaneous, vibrant spark to his songs.

“All that tedious overdubbing and the latest fix-it-in-the-mix computer technology–we’re not interested in that,” Black says. “It’s rough and ready, a diamond in the rough.”

Frank Black started life 38 years ago as Charles Michael Kitteridge Thompson IV. His first taste of the rock life came while banging his guitar in the garage of the suburban Los Angeles home of his Pentecostal mother and stepfather. After the family relocated to Boston, rock and roll took a back seat to other interests, namely astronomy. While living in Puerto Rico as an exchange student, Thompson decided he would either travel to Australia in pursuit of Halley’s comet or form a band.

Rock and roll won the toss. Back in Boston, the aspiring singer-songwriter teamed up with college roommate Joey Santiago, a rich Filipino kid with a knack for buzz-saw guitar licks. At the suggestion of his biker-bar-owner biological dad, he changed his name to Black Francis and adopted the moniker Pixies in Panoply for his band after hooking up with Ohio native Kim Deal, a novice bassist, and Deal’s drummer friend David Lovering.

In 1987, the Pixies released their explosive debut EP, Come on Pilgrim, on the artsy London-based 4AD label. It was followed the next year by the virulent full-length Surfer Rosa, capturing extensive college radio play and critical raves.

A major label deal followed. But by the time 1989’s breakthrough Doolittle (Elektra) hit the airwaves, featuring the college radio fave “Monkey Gone to Heaven,” the Pixies were already falling apart owing to tension between the band’s founder and Deal. The Pixies released two more albums–1990’s Bossanova (which featured some of Black’s best UFO-obsessed lyrics) and 1991’s Trompe le Monde–but by then Deal had already formed her own band, the Breeders, featuring Tanya Donelly of Throwing Muses.

“We carved out a nice little niche for ourselves,” reflects Black. “We had a good little run. But I don’t think that if we had stuck it out longer we would have been big and famous. I think that the music was far too quirky for that. The bands that sell millions and millions of records have some kind of mass appeal, a genuine pop cleverness or charisma.

“Sometimes it’s just because they’re lame and boring, and that’s what people are looking for at a particular time.”

In 1993, under the new pseudonym Frank Black, Thompson recruited Santiago, members of Pere Ubu, and several session players and released his eponymous solo CD to mixed reviews. In subsequent years, Black fell out of favor with critics who once hailed him as an innovator but later turned against him for being too experimental. “I actually find that even my most quirky moments aren’t that quirky compared to [avant-garde San Francisco group] the Residents or some band like that,” says Black. “I mean, compared to them I feel like I’m in the Bay City Rollers.

“But I guess it’s better to have people writing bad reviews about you than nothing at all. I’ve always been fortunate in that regard.”

These days, Black is living the good life–even the reviews are good. “I have a nice house, a beautiful girlfriend, lots of pets,” he says, sounding like the antithesis of the angst-ridden alt-rocker. “My home life is a pretty happy, warm, fuzzy experience in the California sunshine. It’s a nice thing to come home to after being in nightclubs and Holiday Inns for a few weeks.”

And as for the road, even that’s treating Black kindly. “You learn where the good cafes and truck stops are. You learn to love certain stretches of road just for the sheer beauty of it. And, of course, the big payoff at the end of most days is the gig,” he says. “We get to play–that’s a great reward, getting to play at a rock show. I mean, that never gets boring. There’s always something exciting about it, whether it’s sold out or not. Whether it’s a big club or a tiny club. Whether it’s a great place or a shitty place. The bottom line is that you’re going to play music and there are going to be people there to hear you, so that always is there. There’s always a crowd. There’s always you. And there are always your instruments.

“It’s exciting to go out there and prove yourself, to go out there and say, ‘I have a great rock moment in me, so stick around for a while.'”

Frank Black and the Catholics perform Tuesday, May 14, at 8pm at the Mystic Theatre, 21 Petaluma Blvd., Petaluma. Tickets are $18. David Lovering, scientific phenomenalist, opens the show. 707.765.2121.

From the May 9-15, 2002 issue of the North Bay Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Mother’s Day

0

Thanks, Mom

Mom means kitchen, kitchen means love

By Sara Bir

Where does food come from? Maybe the garden or the grocery store or–God forbid–the 7-11. As for dinner, I know the origins. Dinner comes from Mom.

Well, dinner used to come from Mom. That’s what, traditionally, Moms do (or did): They fix dinner and pack your lunches. On your birthday, they make a cake, and they are the ones who go shopping to buy things to make the cake. It’s part of the job description: “Feed family.”

Dinner was very rarely up to my specs when I was a kid. I wanted fried chicken from the deli counter at the grocery store, and we got chicken taco casserole. I wanted fish and chips from the local deep-fry palace, and we got seafood gumbo. I wanted hamburgers from Burger King, and we got thick patties from the grill in the backyard. I wanted Spaghetti-O’s, and we got baked ziti. I wanted a fast-food restaurant, and I got a mother.

My mother was very much a mother of the ’70s–a time when recently liberated women were entering the work force, but it was still par for the course to grow and can your own green beans. Mom had a vast assortment of harvest-gold and avocado-green appliances–a yogurt maker, a waffle iron, an electric skillet, a Sunbeam mixer–and she put them to good use. I ate the results, but unless she was making cookies or a cake, I was rarely excited about it. And you can’t say she didn’t try:

Mom: What would you like for dinner tomorrow night, honey?

Honey: I dunno.

Mom: How about pork chops?

Honey: Umm, no.

Mom: What about chili? I have some top round I need to use.

Honey: No! It’s too spicy.

Mother: Well then, pot roast?

Honey: Pot roast? Yuck! (pause) Will you make canned biscuits?

Mother: (sigh) What would you like, sweetheart?

Sweetheart: Oh, I don’t care.

So come the next night, the loving brood gathers around the table after an hour of “Will you please set the table now?” and “I need you to turn off the TV and set the table like I asked you to 20 minutes ago” and “Turn off the TV already and go get your father; dinner’s been ready for 10 minutes!”–and what’s waiting for us? Stuffed green peppers! Oh, odious peppers! Even if I took the stuffing out of the pepper and pretended it was meatloaf like Mom said, never did they pique my child’s palate. When has meatloaf ever come from a soggy pepper? No wonder I refused to turn off the TV and set the table; Leave It to Beaver reruns were far more entertaining than the stuffed green peppers Mom was squandering away her talents on.

I don’t think people realize how much of a privilege and a gift it is to be able to have the responsibility of someone else. Cooking for yourself can be satisfying, but it misses half the point, the part where you say, “Look: I love you so much that I made you this yummy beet and orange salad, and I want you to eat it and feel good about yourself.” A privilege like that is easy to forget if you are already overbooked and having to stop at the store for milk on the way to pick the kids up from soccer practice, knowing full well there is a yard to be mowed and laundry to be washed.

It’s also easy to forget that cooking for others is a gift when the very people you are cooking for want to bring the gift back and exchange it. Suddenly, dinner becomes a power struggle. At the age of 10, facing those soggy stuffed green peppers, “Yuck!” was the first thing that came to mind, not “Gee, it’s so nice of Mom to put the effort into making wholesome meals for her family after she’s had to put up with grumpy engineers at work all day long.”

No one wants to perform for an indifferent audience, let alone a hostile one. When I complained to Mom about the unsatisfactory contents of my lunch bag, she pointed out that I was 15 and more than capable of preparing my own lunch to take to school. How capable was I? Promptly my lunches became nothing but entire cans of pineapple chunks, and still I found it to be a burden.

Once my mother began working as a secretary, the source of our dinners became markedly more processed, and my childhood fondness for canned biscuits was sated. With the arrival of our fancy new microwave came a nuclear frenzy of dishes that should never, ever have been microwaved. But I seemed to warm up to it, even the micro-baked cupcakes, which turned out as pales as a baby’s ass. The less time Mom had to spend in the kitchen, the more I liked our dinners.

As convenience products become more convenient and takeout menus replace recipes, actual cooking becomes more of a hobby and less of a duty. It’s saddening to realize the amounts of fast food that many children consume today–not as a special occasional treat, but as a staple food group. When dinner starts to come from the drive-through, that’s when it stops coming from Mom.

For my mother, who had had her affairs with Mastering the Art of French Cooking and fondue pots when she and my father were first married, I think there was more relief than guilt in her new factory-assisted wave of dinner preparation. She never used to buy jarred tomato sauce or packets of Uncle Ben’s rice pilaf mix, but that was before she had 40 prime hours taken from her week and two kids to cart around to their roster of after-school activities. Though she may have fondly recalled the days when she made her own granola, I don’t think she missed them–she was too tired to.

There are nights when I come home from work, go through the mail, listen to my messages, exercise, shower, and wind up too pooped to fix anything for dinner more elaborate than frozen pizza–and I’m just a single woman in her 20s. It’s easy for me to blather on about how parents now are doing a crappy job of feeding their kids, because I don’t have any. If I want to feed myself junk, that’s fine; it only affects me. But what if I had a family? What would we be having for dinner tonight? Either I’d have to become less of a wuss, pressing on and cooking the damn dinner, or not work at all and become a full-time housewife.

Which would be fine with me, although it’s not often a choice, is it? Until being a housewife offers a competitive wage, the moms of America who are out in the work force–by need and not by preference–will be staying right there.

It’s hard work to feed a family under any circumstances–and the circumstances are always going to be changing, but the importance of sitting down as a family to share a dinner together hasn’t dwindled. I know that I would be a very different person if my mother hadn’t cooked for us–whether it was homemade chicken soup or Stove-Top stuffing mix from the box–and that certainly never crossed my mind while I staring down rejected stuffed green peppers.

So thanks, Mom.

From the May 9-15, 2002 issue of the North Bay Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Protest Music

0


Once We Had Heroes: Neil Young was once king of the protest song; now he’s all for “going after Satan.” Folksinger Leslie Nuchow (inset) tries to focus on music’s healing power.

Is Protest Music Dead?

Music used to be the dominant voice against war. Now it’s easier to shut up and get paid.

By Jeff Chang

Ever since John Lennon and Yoko Ono led a raucous crowd of flower-toting, peasant-bloused hippies in the pot-hazy chorus of “Give Peace a Chance,” it seemed to have been a pop axiom: When the United States goes to war, the musicians call for peace.

Opposing war hasn’t always been a popular position, but it has created some great music. During the Vietnam era, songs like Edwin Starr’s “War,” Jimi Hendrix’s cover of “All Along the Watchtower,” Funkadelic’s “Maggot Brain” and “Wars of Armageddon,” Jimmy Cliff’s “Vietnam,” Country Joe and the Fish’s “I-Feel-Like-I’m-Fixin’-to-Die Rag,” Creedence Clearwater Revival’s “Bad Moon Rising” and “Have You Ever Seen the Rain?” and Marvin Gaye’s “What’s Going On” turned defiance into a raging, soaring, brave, and melancholic gesture of community.

Even our allegedly apathetic post-Lennonist generation has extended the tradition. When Bush Senior sent troops to Kuwait in 1991, rappers Ice Cube and Paris trained their verbal guns on the White House in “I Wanna Kill Sam” and “Bush Killa,” while Bad Religion and Noam Chomsky split a 7″ into a no-war-for-oil seminar. Antiwar music has become a time-honored balance to the “bomb ’em all and let God sort ’em out” fervor. So why, since Sept. 11, have we heard so little new music protesting Bush Junior’s war on evil?

Artists who were once outspoken peaceniks seem to have lost their certainty or even switched their position. For years, U2 led crowds in chants of “No more war!” during their concerts. But during their surrealistic Super Bowl half-time performance this past January, they offered deep ambivalence: a stark display of the names of Sept. 11 victims set to “Beautiful Day.”

Neil Young’s “Ohio” memorialized Kent State University’s murdered antiwar protesters of 1970; his “Cortez the Killer” condemned imperialism. Now we find him on his post-Sept. 11 cut “Let’s Roll,” singing, “Let’s roll for freedom / Let’s roll for love / Going after Satan / On the wings of a dove.”

Young wrote the song to honor the heroes of Flight 93 who subdued their hijackers and paid the ultimate price. But if you believe “Let’s Roll”–with its Bush-reduced ideas of evil and Satan–is a cry for peace, you’ve probably already cleaned out your bomb shelter and reviewed your duck-and-cover manual.

As Leslie Nuchow, a Brooklyn-based folksinger who has been touring the country, says, “Speaking on or singing anything that’s critical of this country at this time is more difficult than it was a year ago.”

We’ve seen dozens of acts quietly bury their edgier songs. We’ve seen radio playlists rewritten so as not to “offend listeners.” And we’ve seen Republican officials and the entertainment industry–long divided over traditional-values issues such as violent content and parental advisory stickering–bury the hatchet. White House Senior Adviser Karl Rove has been meeting regularly with entertainment industry officials to discuss how they can help the war on terrorism.

The result? Not unlike the network news, there’s been what a media wonk might call a narrowing of content choice. Think eagle- and flag-adorned anthologies of patriotic music, prefab benefit shows screaming “Consumer Event!”, Alan Jackson’s “Where Were You (When the World Stopped Turning),” and Paul McCartney’s “Freedom.” Perhaps this may all be good for the record business–no small thing for an industry that found itself shrinking by 3 percent (about $300 million in revenues) last year. But it’s hardly the stuff of great art.

Gonna Win, Yeah

Where are the alternative voices? Let’s start with hip-hop, the most socially important music of our time and, until recently, the most successful. Hip-hop’s sales plunged last year–by 20 percent, according to Def Jam founder and rap industry leader Russell Simmons.

And so did its vision. While Congress debated the Patriot Act and air strikes left Afghan cities in ruins and untold innocents dead, Jay-Z and Nas declared their own dirty little war for the pockets (if not exactly the minds) of the younger generation.

Jay-Z’s dis of Nas, “The Takeover,” was based on a sample from the Doors’ “Five to One,” an anti-Vietnam War song released during 1968’s long, hot summer whose title supposedly alluded to a demographic menace: five times as many people under the age of 21 as over.

Here’s Jim Morrison’s original: “The old get old / And the young get stronger / May take a week / And it may take longer / They got the guns / But we got the numbers / Gonna win, yeah / We’re taking over!” Here’s Jay-Z’s slice: “Gonna win, yeah!” Released on Sept. 11, his Roc-a-Fella Records album The Blueprint sold 465,000 copies.

Nas came back with Stillmatic, an album seemingly conceived from a marketing blueprint. Over a decade ago, Nas debuted during the height of hip-hop’s social consciousness. To appease these aging fans, he included songs on Stillmatic like the decidedly non-flag-waving “My Country” and “Rule,” which bravely ask Bush Junior and the secret bunker crew to “call a truce, world peace, stop acting like savages.” But kids love that shit-talking, so there’s also “Ether,” dissing “Gay-Z and Cock-a-Fella Records.” Guess which of these songs gets the most rewinds?

In fact, many musicians are commenting on the war; they just aren’t being heard. On a new album for Fine Arts Militia called We Are Gathered Here . . . , Public Enemy’s Chuck D has set scathing spoken-word lectures to rockish beats by Brian Hardgroove. Chuck takes apart the war-mobilization effort and condemns the arrogance of the president’s foreign policy on “A Twisted Sense of God.” But while the song will be available as an MP3 on his website (www.slamjamz.com), the album has found no distributor yet.

He says, “You got five corporations that control retail. You got four who are the record labels. Then you got three radio outlets who own all the stations. You got two television networks that will actually let us get some of this across. And you got one video outlet. I call it five-four-three-two-one. Boom!”

When the World Ends

Message music is being pinched off by an increasingly monopolized media industry suddenly eager to please the White House. At least two of the nation’s largest radio networks–Clear Channel and Citadel Communications–removed songs from the air in the wake of the attacks. Songs like Drowning Pool’s “Bodies” and John Lennon’s “Imagine” were confined to MP3 sites and mix tapes. And while pressure to maintain blacklists has eased recently, the détente between Capitol Hill, New York, and Hollywood–unseen since World War II–has tangible consequences.

Bay Area artist Michael Franti and Spearhead were invited last November to play the Late Late Show with Craig Kilborn. Franti obliged with a new song, “Bomb Da World.” Yet the song’s chorus–“You can bomb the world to pieces / But you can’t bomb it into peace”–was apparently too much for the show’s producers. Months later, and only after a Billboard magazine article exposed the story, the clip finally aired.

“It’s funny,” Franti says. “In the past, I’d hear some folksingers singing folk songs or ‘Give Peace a Chance’ and think, God, this is really corny. But then you realize, in a time of war, it’s a really radical message.”

Little wonder that artists have quietly censored themselves. The Strokes pulled a song called “New York Cops” from their album, and Dave Matthews decided not to release “When the World Ends” as a single. It’s easier to do an industry-sponsored benefit or to simply shut up and go along than to fight for a message and find it pigeonholed.

As monopolies segment music into narrower and narrower genre markets to be exploited, protest music becomes the square peg. Perhaps the question isn’t only whether protest music can survive the war but whether protest music can also survive niche marketing.

Take KRS-One’s new album, Spiritual Minded. In part a reaction to the Sept. 11 attacks, the album reconciles Christian spirituality with a radical notion of diversity–putting together Bronx beats, Cantopop, biblical chapter and verse, and the word “peace” and the Islamic greeting “As-salaam Alaikum” in the same song.

“We live in a Christian nation,” he says. “I can only give the public that which it can digest. So I put this album out. The door swings open. Christians are like, ‘Yeah, wow, KRS! He finally came over.’ Now I’m over. Now let’s talk.”

But if this is his most subtle effort yet to promote a message of peace and unity, it is still a record that needs to be marketed. So while Spiritual Minded has been a dud in the hip-hop world, it topped the less lucrative Gospel charts earlier this year.

Even indie labels no longer provide an alternative, says Joel Schalit, Bay Area-based contributor to Punk Planet magazine and member of dub-funk band Elders of Zion. Schalit’s new book, Jerusalem Calling, features a chapter indicting the indie-punk scene, a movement that began as a highly charged reaction to Reaganism and major labels and ended up a calcifying, apolitical, “petite bourgeois” feeder-system for the same majors.

“I think our generation has started to move in the direction of formulating its own distinct progressive political positions, but in many respects, I think that the trauma that was Sept. 11 has thus far stopped them from doing anything new,” he says. “There haven’t been people rushing out to print 7″ singles attacking American foreign policy like there was during the Gulf War.”

He adds, “A lot of label owners, especially on the independent level, are very concerned that promoting ideology is not the same as promoting art.”

If that sounds reasonable at first glance, consider the question that Bay Area antiprison activist and Freedom Fighter Music co-producer Ying-sun Ho asks in reference to rap: “You don’t think a song that talks about nothing but how much your jewelry shines has a political content to it?”

Acts like Jay-Z are seen as artists with universal appeal, whereas niche marketing lumps together acts that have little in common. The subcategory of “conscious rappers,” for instance, has been used to sell Levi’s jeans and Gap clothing to college-educated, disposable-income-spending hip-hop fans. In this logic, it’s not the rappers’ message that brings the audience together, it’s what their audience wears that brings the rappers together.

Part of the recent wave of conscious rap acts promoted by major labels, rap duo Dead Prez disdains the entire category. Positivity isn’t politics, rapper M-1 argues. Hip-hop has not yet produced much antiwar music because a lot of conscious rappers were never clear about their political positions in the first place, he believes, and Sept. 11 revealed their basic lack of depth.

“There’s a lifestyle that goes with not being aligned with the politics of U.S. imperialism. It’s not just a one-day protest,” he says while working in Brooklyn on Walk Like a Warrior, the follow-up to 2000’s Let’s Get Free. “We’re in a new period. A lot of people are not seeing what has to be and are looking at it from just a red, white, and blue angle.”

Hard Rain Gonna Fall

But perhaps, in this connected world, we also possess accelerated expectations. History shows that radical ideas don’t take hold overnight. World War II’s hit parade featured sentimental escapism like Bing Crosby’s “White Christmas” and sugary patriotism like the Andrews Sisters’ “Boogie Woogie Bugle Boy.”

During the ’50s, a progressive folk movement emerged, but it wasn’t until Bob Dylan, Phil Ochs, and Joan Baez revived folk amid the early ’60s ferment of student organizing that ideas of disarmament and racial justice began to take root.

As Craig Werner, professor of African-American studies at the University of Wisconsin, Madison and author of A Change Is Gonna Come: Music, Race, and the Soul of America, tells me, “The foundation of the anti-Vietnam War music was in the folk revival. It was almost as if there were an antiwar movement that was in place that was doing the groundwork. They’d been writing those kinds of songs for years when Vietnam came around.”

Werner dates the emergence of anti-Vietnam War music to ex-folkie Barry McGuire’s 1966 hit, “Eve of Destruction,” a song that faced widespread censorship. “I was growing up in Colorado Springs, which is a military town. The week that ‘Eve of Destruction’ came out, it broke onto the Top 20 charts on the local station at No. 1. And then was never heard again.”

That moment is not near in these early days of the war on evil. In the long run, Nas’ “My Country” and “Rule,” with their laser focus on cause and effect, or Outkast’s antirecessionary global humanism on “The Whole World” may prove to be more prophetic.

For now, confusion and flux and omnidirectional rage carry the day. Bay Area rapper Paris recently addressed the second Bush in “What Would You Do,” a track on his upcoming Sonic Jihad album: “Now ask yourself who’s the one with the most to gain / Before 9-11 motherfuckas couldn’t stand his name / Now even niggas waiving flags like they lost they mind / Everybody got opinions but don’t know the time.”

Ghostface Killah seems to have captured the moment on Wu-Tang Clan’s “Rules.” Addressing Osama bin Laden directly about the attacks on New York, he raps, “No disrespect, that’s where I rest my head / I understand you gotta rest yours too.” But since bin Laden has brought the bombs–“Nigga, my people’s dead!”–it’s officially on: “Mr. Bush, sit down! We’re in charge of the war.”

Healing Force

Still, musicians must do what they do, and the story is not yet over. Folkie Leslie Nuchow believes in music’s ability to transform the people who listen to it, and she doesn’t waste a lot of time worrying about who will distribute it. Recently, she recorded the mesmerizing “An Eye for an Eye (Will Leave the Whole World Blind).” Accompanied only by piano, she elaborates on Gandhi’s famous line mostly in a tortured whisper. It’s only available through her website (www.slammusic.com).

Nuchow–who likes to point out that our national anthem “glorifies war” but has agreed to sing for U.N. troops stationed in Kosovo later this year–believes music is not merely a product, it’s a process. After watching the Twin Towers collapse from her Brooklyn building, she spent that evening agonizing over what to do next. “I kept on saying to myself, what could my political action be?” Then she realized, “I’m a musician. Ri-i-i-ight. Let me do music!”

She went to demonstrations and gatherings, and handed out fliers inviting people to come and sing the next morning. About 50 people showed up. They walked through the streets singing “This Little Light of Mine,” “America the Beautiful,” and “Dona Nobis Pacem (Give Us Peace).”

“We walked as close to Ground Zero as we could get, and we sang for the firefighters,” she says. “We sang for the rescue workers and the firefighters. We went up to the hospitals, and we sang for the doctors, and we sang for the volunteers. And then–this was the hardest–we went to sing for the families who were trying to find out what happened to their loved ones.”

Nuchow recalls that the music did exactly what it was supposed to do. “People wept. Other people came and joined us,” she says. “And to me, that’s action. That’s making a statement through music, using music as a healing force.”

And for now, perhaps, that’s more than enough.

From the May 9-15, 2002 issue of the North Bay Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Papa’s Taverna

0


Photograph by Rory McNamara

Shake Your Bon Bon: Belly dancer Tina Turrini entertains Papa’s patrons.

The Good Life

Papa has the food and wine, you bring the dancing shoes

By Maria Wood

Papa’s Taverna, a Greek-American restaurant in Petaluma, is a bit off the beaten path. But that’s OK. Patrons here don’t look like they’re in any hurry to go anywhere.

They sit back, eat a little, drink a little, and philosophize about life. They eat a little more, drink a little more, and argue about soccer and politics. Then they listen to the musicians and dance. Then it’s time to start all over again. It can be an all-day event; this is true Mediterranean-style dining.

“Last night we were here until after two,” says the restaurant’s patriarch, Leo Papageorge. Everyone calls him Papa. “We close at midnight on weekends. Or maybe we close at nine? But everyone kept dancing, so we couldn’t leave,” he adds with a shrug.

The regulars know to bring a blanket for the kids. And when it gets late, the children fall asleep under the dinner tables. Or sometimes all the sleeping children are moved over to one section of the restaurant, while someone’s grandma usually mills about making sure everyone’s covered.

“There’s no reason to leave kids with a babysitter,” Papa says shaking his head. “You bring them here with you so you can all be together. Family is the most important thing.”

Along with family, Papa considers friends, community, and tradition as the essentials for a good life. And Sunday, May 5, everything you need for the good life (including a tasty hunk of lamb) will be at Papa’s Taverna as it celebrates the Orthodox Easter. This is by far the most important holiday in the Eastern Orthodox religion, and the festivities bear that out.

“Oh, there is nothing else like it. It is the type of thing you remember all your life,” Papa says, recalling the Easter celebrations of his younger days in Greece. “All the families would go out and find an empty area by the street and cook a whole lamb out there on a spit. And then anyone who walks by, they have to taste a piece of your lamb. Also, back then, families would make their own wine. So everyone would take a taste of everyone else’s wine and the lamb. And then we would get so full and tired and just lie down on the grass.

“It was beautiful, beautiful. To be lying there, with all your family and friends around you, and everyone eating and drinking and having such a wonderful time. What can be better than that?”

The Easter celebration at the Taverna will be “just like the ones we have in Greece,” Papa says. A whole lamb will be cooked over a spit outside. There will be plenty of wine. And if you want to lie down on the grass, you’re welcome to it. The restaurant is on a spacious piece of property next to the Petaluma River. Some customers arrive by boat. The dock has been in use since the mid 1800s when this location was known as Donahue’s Landing.

“This place has a lot of history,” Papa says. “Like me. I have a lot of history too.”

Papa is only 60. But when one is confronted with the prospect of dying soon, life has a way of becoming more intense: Papa has been living with the threat of dying young ever since he was 27 years old.

At that time, his kidneys failed, probably due to an injury he received as a professional soccer player. The doctors gave him two to three years to live. “And then after three years, they gave me another two years. And after I lived another two years, they gave me another few years. That’s been going on for more than 30 years now.” Three years ago, Papa received a transplant and no longer has to go in for dialysis three times a week.

“I broke all medical records,” he says with more than a hint of pride. “Everything I do, I always try to do the best–even being sick. No one thought I would be around this long, except for me. I knew I would live, and I didn’t listen to the doctors. You have to believe in what you know and not what everyone tells you.”

Stories of the medical miracle spread, and some people started thinking of Papa as a psychic healer. He began getting calls and visits from ill people looking for help.

Lana Sutton, Papa’s life partner, tells about a man “who came to the restaurant, and he was leaning quite heavily on his cane. You could tell he had a difficult time walking.” The man asked to speak with Papa, and the two of them went off for quite some time. “When they were done,” Sutton continues, “this man came over to the counter and handed me his cane and said he wouldn’t be needing it anymore. Just like that. And he just walked out, on his own.”

When asked what he told the man with the cane, Papa just replies, “The truth.”

Sutton says she still keeps the cane behind the counter. And if she spots Papa looking at a pretty woman for too long, she uses the cane, vaudeville-style, to loop it around his neck and tug him over to her.

Even more than being a healer, Papa has earned a reputation for being an advisor. Staring down death all these years has made him quite philosophical about life. Plus, he says, “Greeks are natural philosophers. We have the DNA for philosophy.”

So it’s little wonder that people turn to him as they would a wise elder. “I’m everybody’s grandfather,” he says. “A lot of people come to me for advice. If someone wants to get married, something like that, they come talk to me and get my opinion.

“I always tell them what I think: the truth. But I also tell them there’s a reason they have two ears. They can let other people’s opinions in through one ear. And then, if they want, they can let those opinions out the other ear.”

Some people come to the restaurant looking for advice about marriage. Others come looking for a good meal, and they end up getting married.

“See that women over there?” Papa says, pointing to an attractive brunette folk dancing with the others out on the floor. “She met her husband here. Then they had a little girl, and they brought her over to the restaurant so we could see her right after she was born.” As if on cue, the little girl, now two, runs across the patio once again, followed closely by an older cousin. “There she is! There’s the one!” Papa laughs, as he pretends to grab her.

For Papa, family life and restaurants are a natural combination. In fact, some of his earliest memories have to do with helping out his parents at their restaurant in Athens. “I was just four years old, and I would help them carry the water glasses to the tables. I’d pick up one glass with both hands, and I would very carefully walk over to the table and stand up on my toes and reach my arms up, up high, and put the glass on the table. And people would laugh and cheer. It was wonderful. I have many good memories.”

Papa’s own son, Jimmy Papageorge, 33, was raised in restaurants, just like his father before him. “Jimmy spent 33 years by my side, learning everything,” Papa says. As well as inheriting his father’s recipe collection, it seems Jimmy has also inherited Papa’s gift of gab. “Jimmy is very, very funny,” Papa says. “And he loves to socialize, just like I do.”

Eight months ago, Jimmy Papageorge moved on to his own restaurant, the new Papa’s Taverna on Washington Street in Petaluma. The establishment is more centrally located, and the surroundings are more modern. But, it seems, the old union of food, family, and friends is bound to continue.

Papa’s Taverna celebrates Greek Orthodox Easter on Sunday, May 5, with live music, folk dancing, a belly dancer, and, of course, great food. 5688 Lakeville Hwy., Petaluma. Call for reservations. 707.769.8545. The restaurant is regularly open Monday-Thursday, 11:30am-2:30pm, and Friday-Sunday, 11:30am-9pm. Live Greek music, dancing, and belly-dance shows on Saturdays and Sundays.

From the May 2-8, 2002 issue of the North Bay Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Fashion Trends


You’re So Vain: Personal decoration can be so rewarding.

Little Extras

It’s what’s on the outside that counts

By Gretchen Giles

Perhaps it’s true that when the Garden gate slammed shut behind him, Adam reached for a fig leaf to cover his nakedness. But it’s a darn good bet that Eve touched her bare earlobes, looked down at her naked neckline, and meditatively drummed her unadorned fingers. Picking a stray bit of apple from her hair, she may have snapped, “Adam, find me some silver to wear. If I’m to bear knowledge, menstrual cramps, babies, woetide, and suffering, I may as well look great doing it.” And lo–accessories came into the world, and they were good.

Examine that same scene with an eye to natural selection, and flash to some of Eve’s more challenged offspring. Scrabbling about in the sulfured dawn of human history, early humanity descended from trees in order to scrimp by on the ground barefoot in filthy furs and, it turns out, necklaces. Forget space travel, housing, surgery, and gourmet cooking–surely this marriage of fire with tools found its highest and best use in fashion accessories.

Beyond the glint of the cave fire, jewelry has usually offered a hint to rank, wealth, or perceived lovability. But add the marvelous invention of sunglasses, and you’ve got another revolution: the birth of the cool. What would Jack Nicholson be today without Wayfarers riding above a rakish grin? Grace Kelly, chignon elegantly swathed in a scarf, couldn’t have trod the Riviera with such chic had her eyes been visible to all and sundry.

Once one wades into the large and swimmingly big world of accessories, it appears that most of what we wear, drive, and perhaps even bed, pet, or rear falls into the category of the extra. Because what, after all, is an accessory? As an antonym to “necessary,” perhaps it’s easier to define what it’s not: Not underwear. Not pants. Not shirts, skirts, shoes, shorts, jackets, suits, T-shirts, tights, or dresses. That leaves everything else, including undersized pets, children, bimbos, gigolos, cell phones, cars–of course cars–and the ordinary adornments to face and body.

While we’ve always striven to improve on God’s or nature’s genetic gifts, it is magazine editors who actually determine what makes us well-dressed butterflies or drab, old cows. And what do magazine editors wear? Black. They march down Fifth Avenue in a veritable salute to the absence of color, differentiated only by mastheads and accessories. This one has an A-line haircut and oversized glasses. That one favors heavy silver; another only wears Gaultier; this one’s sold her soul to Paloma Picasso.

So while the peacocks parade down the runways, clad in fantastical guerrilla military/school girl/flaming chanteuse exotica, the people who make the decisions about your external worthiness rely on an unchanging monochromatic costume enlivened solely by this year’s must-have accessory. But unlike magazine editors, who are so awash in free samples and gifts that the only thing they ever have to purchase for themselves is deodorant, most of us can’t afford to upgrade our add-ons each year. All of which means that when most ordinary people fall for a trend, they go hard and stay long.

Look down at your own wrist. If you’ve allowed your eyes to graze a fashion magazine in the last three years, you’re probably now wearing or have worn one of those Zen prayer bracelets that catapulted ordinary agates and cheap lapis beads into a raging “statement.” Perhaps now is the moment to consider: Are you really more serene or just $60 dollars lighter? Those of us sentient in the ’80s covered our forearms with the black rubber o-rings Madonna favored in Desperately Seeking Susan. Hair scrunchies, butterfly clips, baby-doll bobby pins, chokers, toe rings, waist chains, pocket chains, dress clips, anklets, mood rings–a hundred cheap, silver bangles compose a prose poem to money down the drain, flushed away by the vagaries of trend.

More permanent are the drastic-change choices of piercings and tattoos, which last longer than most other good ideas. Isn’t setting yourself apart while fitting in the sneaky, sideways point of all of this? If it weren’t, magazine editors wouldn’t bother with Paloma and heavy silver. They would happily settle–oh, the relief!–for merely enduring the all-black uniform their position demands.

But that wouldn’t be much fun. Personally, I’ve spent the better part of the spring hunting for the perfect camping necklace. A camping necklace, in the event you are unfamiliar with the concept, is one that can be worn without annoyance while sleeping on a packed-dirt scrabble, looks good with a bathing suit, and doesn’t snag Gore-Tex or leave a tarnish around your neck. Where my knowledge of physics or the complete letters of Samuel Johnson should reside runs instead a fiery little pant to finally finding such an item. Some people feel this way about shoes. So do I. Others have a passion for belts. Me too. And still more fantasize in a quietly obsessive way about earrings–I should know.

Surely, were I to be granted some otherworldly slide through the space-time continuum and find myself just a few pages back from the Song of Solomon, I would lift my anguished eyes to the sky and harshly voice the question natural to all fashion-conscious Western women: “Dear good, wise Eve, what have you wrought–and wherever did you get that purse?”

From the May 2-8, 2002 issue of the North Bay Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Miniature Shoe Artist Raine

0

Thinking Outside The (Shoe)Box: Raine has a closet full of shoes any (very small) woman would die for.


Photograph by Michael Amsler



Shoe and Tell

A little shoemaker cobbles together collector’s items

Unusual occupations breed unusual habits. The jeans-clad woman in the burgundy jacket–the one arranging tiny shoes on the table in preparation for a photo shoot–is a prime example. Known to the universe by the single name Raine, the supremely confident North Bay-based dynamo who scurries around before me is the same meticulous sculptor whose hands have created every one of those tiny ceramic shoes–and hundreds of thousands just like them.

You’ve seen the shoes, right? In gift shops and department stores and just about everywhere else, Raine’s creations, marketed under the name “Just the Right Shoe,” are a collectible-world phenomenon. The whimsical miniatures have been around for exactly five years now, manufactured and distributed by Willitts Designs in Petaluma, appearing in a total of 222 different styles from snakeskin boots and cork-soled sandals to disco heels and rainbow-colored tennies.

Few are bigger than four inches long. Each is designed to resemble a right-footed shoe. All are given clever names–Rosie Toes, Suffragette, Bovine Bliss–that frequently involve puns. They usually sell in stores between $12 and $24. Like the woman who invented them, they are a certified phenomenon.

The details are obsessively exact, right down to the hint of Velcro peeking out from under the crinkled-leather strap on an elegant, crescent-moon-adorned dancing shoe. Every tiny shoe gives the appearance of having once had a tiny foot inside it, doing wonderfully tiny things in a tiny and magical world.

So it’s no surprise when Raine, settling into a chair in Willitts’ spacious conference room after the photographer has at last been excused, laughingly admits that becoming a world-famous shoe designer has given birth to an unexpected side effect.

“I now spend a lot of time looking at people’s feet,” she says. “It’s embarrassing sometimes, but I do. I’m always sneaking peeks at other people’s feet. And when I’m not doing that, I’m studying the history of shoes. I know more about shoes and feet than I ever imagined there was to know.”

Raine’s own feet, for the record, are covered this afternoon in a pair of soft-yellow leather clogs, each adorned with a Japanese geisha painted on the leather with digitally injected dye.

“Aren’t these cool?” she says, slipping one off and handing it over. “I used to wear very boring shoes, but my fans like to see me in something more interesting now. Whenever I go out to meet my fans,” she adds, eyes widening along with her smile, “they want to see me in painful shoes. They want to see me in . . .this.” She picks up a stiletto-heeled disco shoe.

Ouch. Even at full size, if such a shoe existed, the thing would be uncomfortable to wear. But it would make an impression.

“Until I became known as a shoe sculptor, I was pretty much the typical artist,” Raine says. “I mostly wore sneakers and jeans all day, the standard uniform of the struggling artist with no money.”

“Struggling” and “no money” are certainly not terms that can be applied to Raine these days. Since its unveiling, the “Just the Right Shoe” line has earned revenues approaching $100 million. Not at all bad, especially when you consider that Raine (a shortened version of her given name, Lorraine) was originally told by the executives at Willitts that her funny little shoes had no marketing potential. Fortunately, says Raine, a group of female employees were shown those first two samples: an exact replica of her husband’s Vietnam War combat boot, and a red high-heeled pump (presumably not her husband’s). The employees’ over-the-top reaction, cooing and squealing and competing to hold the shoes, convinced the skeptical execs to reconsider.

It’s an especially astonishing story given that, until then, Raine had given little thought to shoe styles–or feet–at all.

“I never knew I was a shoe designer,” she says, “until after I’d started designing shoes.”

An accomplished artist for much of her life, Raine earned a degree in illustration from the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, back when she was still thinking of herself primarily as a painter. But by the time she graduated, it was the life of a sculptor that she found herself dreaming of.

“So then I had to learn the mechanics of sculpting, armature, and casting and molds and all that,” she explains. “It was a bit of an adjustment, technically, but I found that, artistically, all the same things apply. So for me, moving between human forms, animals, inanimate objects–it doesn’t matter.”

While it might seem that a classically trained artist would grow weary of making little shoes all day, Raine insists that she’s anything but bored.

“After five years of designing these,” she says, “I’m not running out of ideas. If anything, they’re getting better. They’re getting more inventive. Which is kind of a surprise. Who knew I’d be enthusiastic about shoes for this long?”

The enthusiasm runs both ways.

There are numerous websites devoted to Raine’s shoes. Many collectors follow the current marketplace trend of selecting only those items from the series that most appeal to them personally or that tie in to some decorating scheme at home or office, but there are plenty of fans whose goal is to own every single shoe–which is not an easy task. Since styles are routinely discontinued (remember Beanie Babies?) some old styles can fetch as much as $1000 on the resale market.

“What I find most interesting about the shoes,” she goes on, “is that they’re made to look not new. They’re not out-of-the-box shoes.” She picks up one of them from the table, a boot with leopard spots, and gives a guided tour of its faux age marks. “Here’s where the ball of the foot has stretched it out a bit, and over here, wrinkles have gathered up around where the ankle moves. You know somebody has worn this, because if it was right out of the box, it would all be smooth and unmarked. You can actually see that a foot has been in here. That’s where my anatomical training kicks in.”

Asked if she has ever, just for yucks, whipped up a left-foot shoe, Raine’s eyes light up.

“I haven’t . . .yet,” she says. “But I have thought about it. I’ve imagined doing a special series of shoes called ‘What’s Left?'”

What indeed?

“When I started this, I never expected that they’d become, you know, this successful. I mean, looking at them, they’re beautiful, and they’re detailed, and they’re fanciful, and . . .”

Sexy?

“Well, some of them do push the envelope a bit. I mean, this one is called Love Hurts,” she says, lifting up a slinky red-and-black number with a heel that looks like a stake through the heart. “My mother would never have let me wear a pair of shoes like these,” she laughs, setting down Love Hurts and picking up Red Hot, a vaguely S&M-tinged leather sandal covered in gleaming studs. “There are some very respectable stores selling these shoes,” she says, nodding when it is suggested that such shoes would be well-received at San Francisco’s Exotic Erotic Ball–the shoes and nothing else.

“Yes! Yes!” Raine laughs. “And, obviously, one wouldn’t need to wear anything else if they were wearing these shoes.”

From the May 2-8, 2002 issue of the North Bay Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Automobile Pollution

0


Cough, Cough: Idling your car provides no benefit to you, your car, or the environment.

Drivers, Kill Your Engines!

As the cars idle, the pollution swells

By Mari Kane

If idle hands lead to Satan’s mischief, imagine the damage done by idling cars. We’ve all seen it–a chugging, empty vehicle spewing a vortex of fumes in front of a store while its owner runs inside for a carton of ice cream.

The American Lung Association kicks off Clean Air Month in May with the announcement of air pollution “grades” for California’s counties. Sonoma County received a grade of D. Napa County received a B; Marin County got an A. Officials point out that Sonoma’s low grade is largely due to pollution traveling north (Alameda, Contra Costa, and Santa Clara counties all received failing grades).

Idling, while by no means the root of the problem, creates air pollution, further exacerbating an existing public health problem; the sound and smell annoy other drivers and pedestrians, thus fostering animosity; and, when viewed in the context of global warming, idling your car is about as responsible as fanning the flames of your burning house.

Canada has already recognized and taken action against auto idling. The city of Toronto, for instance, recently passed a by-law which imposes a fine of up to $5,000 for idling more than three minutes at a time. This shift came after Natural Resources Canada’s (NRCan) Office of Energy Efficiency estimated that in the peak of winter, Canadians voluntarily idle their cars for a total of more than 75 million minutes a day.

“Emissions from idling vehicles are completely unnecessary and can be easily prevented with the turn of a key,” said NRCan minister Ralph Goodale. “If every driver of a light-duty vehicle in Canada avoided idling for just five minutes per day, we would prevent more than 3,800 tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere each day. It will make a world of difference.”

One of the most popular reasons for car idling is to warm up the car, the benefit of which is now considered nonexistent. According to NRCan, idling is actually a bad way to warm up your car’s engine because the incomplete combustion creates fuel residue condensation on cylinder walls while also contaminating engine oil and clogging spark plugs, which further increases fuel waste. Moreover, wheel bearings, steering, suspension, transmission, and tires also need to be warmed up, and the only way to do that is to get the vehicle moving.

As for letting the car run while dashing into a store, NRCan says that idling for more than half a minute burns more gas than it takes to restart the engine.

Santa Rosa Junior College automotive instructor Pat Sullivan agrees that there is no logical or mechanical reason for idling a car or truck, even a diesel one. “No new car needs to warm up,” he says. “Big diesel trucks may be hard to start if they have a turbo charger, and they need to cool down before being turned off. But most manufacturers recommend you just get into a car and drive it.”

Owners of SUVs often claim, as an excuse for idling, that their vehicles’ engines burn cleaner than older models. Sullivan counters that SUVs don’t meet the same carbon dioxide emissions standards as regular cars, and so there is no comparison. According to the Coalition for Clean Air, light trucks and SUVs emit approximately three times more pollution than the average new car and are much less fuel efficient.

Then why do people leave their SUVs and trucks running? Sullivan theorizes that it has something to with the big truck ethos of young, male drivers. “I think they just like to hear the sound of their car idling,” he opines.

Ultimately, the issue comes down to wasting a resource over which the U.S. government wreaks global havoc to provide. For example, at this time, Washington is pressuring the former Soviet republic of Kazakhstan to support the Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline, which would traverse the political hot spots of Azerbaijan, Georgia, and possibly war-torn Afghanistan. In this hemisphere, the Bush administration wants to spend $98 million to support the Colombian army’s effort to protect a pipeline operated by Occidental Petroleum, a conduit that suffered 170 bomb attacks last year and has, over time, spilled more oil than 10 Exxon Valdezes.

So if the thought of poisoning the air, wasting money, and creating a public nuisance isn’t enough to make drivers turn off their ignitions in the gas lines at Costco, perhaps the onus of helping to destabilize our oil-skewed foreign policy will be. With Uncle Sam and Big Oil risking national security in order to provide more fuel for America’s gas tanks, killing one’s engine is perhaps one of the most patriotic things a citizen can do. It sure beats waving a flag.

From the May 2-8, 2002 issue of the North Bay Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

‘Murder By Numbers’

0

Motherly mystery writer takes a stab at ‘Murder By Numbers’

Writer David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate postfilm conversation. This is not a review; rather, it’s a freewheeling, tangential discussion of life, alternative ideas, and popular culture.

It is an unnerving experience to read the last two pages of a novel while its author sits nearby, calmly pretending not to watch you read.

But because I am a mere two pages from the end of Murder in the Sentier–which I was desperately attempting to finish when Cara Black, the author, showed up early for our afternoon movie date–I have been politely ordered to finish the book, as Black sits waiting . . . right in front of me.

“Wow,” I ultimately exclaim, snapping the book shut a few minutes later. “Good ending,” I say.

Black smiles. “You read fast,” she remarks, as if to say, “Come on. You couldn’t have really read all of that in just a couple of minutes!”

Hey, what can I say? I am a fast reader; even faster when I’m being watched.

Cara Black is the unnervingly mild-mannered author of the quirky Aimee Leduc Investigation books, the increasingly-popular series that began with Murder in the Marais and Murder in Belleville, and now continues with Murder in the Sentier (Soho Press, 2002, $24). Each book is named for one of the 20 distinct districts that make up Paris, France, where Black’s hip, impulsive, and emotionally scarred heroine runs a struggling computer security company, and takes a lot of time off to wear slinky leather cat suits while solving strings of murders (Okay, Okay. Aimee only wears the cat-suit once, while masquerading as a hooker, but she does tend to wear a lot of strange things).

Black has met me here today to check out Murder by Numbers, the new Sandra Bullock flick about a not-so-hip emotionally-scarred homicide detective trying to nail two creepy teenagers who may-or-may-not have murdered a woman.

While the film moves a bit slowly for Black’s taste–“I’m kind of a speed freak when it comes to movies,” she says–she enjoyed the movie, and especially liked Bullock’s detective, whom she found to be believable and enormously appealing.

“I liked that she was so aggressive,” says Black, “that she, you know, takes the traditionally male role–seducing her new partner, and then kicking him out of bed. That I liked.”

The wind is breezy but the sun is warm out on the courtyard where we’ve ended up–steaming cups of coffee in hand–to dissect the movie.

“She was kind of charming,” I agree, recalling the beer-swigging, trash-talking, commitment-phobe that Bullock played to messy perfection. “Her house was a wreck and she ate crappy food,” I add. “She did everything guys do but belch and pass gas.”

“Well . . . she doesn’t watch football,” Black points out.

“Yeah, she watches Matlock reruns.”

Matlock,” laughs Black. “Matlock! Blecchhh. Now that I didn’t believe. I know her type. She’d have been watching cartoons, as therapy, to wind down at the end of the day. Aside from that, I think Sandra Bullock did a good job. I like that she’s playing it more dark these days, less cutesy-pie. I thought she made a pretty believable cop. She was tough.”

“I wouldn’t want her slapping me around,” I agree.

“You can just tell,” Black laughs, “that when she slaps the cuffs on you, it’s going to hurt.”

Speaking of hurting, it turns out that, like Bullock’s tough-as-nails cop and the not-so-tough Aimee Leduc, Black knows a thing or two about physical pain.

“I got this tattoo in Katmandu when I was 18 years old,” she says, showing off the mysterious faded Om symbol etched onto her hand in the spot where the thumb and forefinger meet. “It hurt like hell,” she admits. “I couldn’t believe it. I was sitting on the dirt floor of a hut, and an Indian man was sitting next to me, getting his whole arm done, and his wife was sitting on him, wearing her sari, as he was screaming and crying and trying to get up. It was bizarre. I thought, ‘Oh, compared to that, this will be nothing.’ But it hurt so bad I couldn’t stop crying. I don’t know how these people get so many tattoos. Tattoos hurt. Have you ever had a tattoo?”

“Um, no.”

“It kinda rips your skin.”

“So I’d imagine.”

Throughout Murder By Numbers, Bullock stubbornly pursues the high school killers, even though they’ve covered their tracks so well that no one else believes they are guilty. What the killers can’t have accounted for, of course, are Bullock’s uncanny instincts and trustworthy gut reactions. According to Black, instinct is often the only thing a good detective has to go on.

“I interviewed three women in Paris,” she says, “women who have their own detective agencies. I wanted to see what kind of woman would own her own agency, what kind of woman would be doing this thing that is so out of the mold? I really think that, because these women are living outside the mold, because they are living a different life from other women, they have to depend on their instincts. Any detective who’s any good has a well-developed instinct.”

“We always hear about ‘women’s intuition,'” I interject. “Do you think women do have a stronger sense of instinct than men?”

“I don’t know if it’s stronger,” she says, “but I think women trust it more than men do. I remember hearing a piece on NPR–maybe it was BBC radio–where the police department in Amsterdam was hiring 40-year-old women who’d been, quote-unquote, housewives. They were being hired as sergeants in the Red Light district, because they had management and personal skills that no one had ever given them credit for. They can run a household, they can keep everybody on track, and they can also defuse situations when they get out of hand. These are skills that were very valuable in the Red Light district,” she says, “where there were all these drunken tourists and troublemakers.

“Apparently. women do have a knack for reading people,” Black says with a grin. “Some of us have an instinct for dealing with these kinds of characters that the men don’t always have.”

Take that, Matlock.

Web extra to the May 2-8, 2002 issue of the North Bay Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Chanticleer

0

The Singing Dozen: Vocal orchestra Chanticleer sings out strong.


Pure Bliss

Chanticleer’s ‘all consuming’ success

By Greg Cahill

When John Tavener first heard the recording of Chanticleer’s newly released Lamentations and Praises (Teldec)–the Greek and Russian Orthodox-influenced liturgical drama commissioned from Tavener by the San Francisco-based all-male choir–the acclaimed British composer had an immediate, visceral reaction. “I was staggered by it,” he told Gramophone magazine.

The astoundingly moving work, recorded at Skywalker Ranch in San Rafael the week before the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, has struck a chord with those seeking solace in the wake of the madness that has engulfed the world in recent months. Tavener’s ambitious composition is split into 13 ikons, or musical segments, describing Jesus’ descent from the cross to his resurrection from Hades. In addition to Chanticleer’s powerful harmonies and glorious performances by the Handel and Haydn Society of Boston, Tavener has informed his work with an unusual array of instrumentation that combines male voices (ranging from countertenors to a remarkable low C-sharp bass), flute, bass trombone, string quintet, taped material, and a crashing percussion section that includes a timpani, Byzantine monastery bell, a booming Tibetan temple bowl, an oversized tam-tam, tubular bells, and simantron (a large wooden sounding-board struck with a hammer).

In preparation for the recording, Chanticleer, longtime champions of early music, studied for a month with a Greek Orthodox psalmista to learn the subtle ornaments and microtones of this non-Western vocal tradition, usually reserved for the Greek or Slavonic churches.

The meditative CD has left critics dazzled by Chanticleer’s “blissful,” “all-consuming” singing while conjecturing that this may be Tavener’s greatest work yet. “A masterpiece or a personal extravaganza?” wondered Gramophone critic Mary Berry. “It is for you, the listener, to decide.”

North Bay fans of Chanticleer will get a rare opportunity to savor this work in concert when the 12-man vocal powerhouse performs on May 16 at St. Vincent de Paul Church in Petaluma.

Named after the “clear-singing” rooster in Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, Chanticleer has a repertoire ranging from Renaissance vocal to Mexican Baroque to jazz. Now in its 24th season, this Grammy-winning vocal orchestra is no stranger to acclaim. Their 1999 album, Colors of Love, won the Grammy Award for Best Small Ensemble Performance (with or without a conductor) and the Contemporary A Capella Recording Award for Best Classical Album. Last year’s stunning Magnificat, a disc of early music devoted to the Virgin Mary, climbed to number four on Billboard’s classical chart. The ensemble performs over 100 concerts a year throughout the world, appearing regularly in New York, Boston, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., Chicago, Toronto, Tokyo, and Paris, as well as in their home base of San Francisco.

At a time when the ensemble’s Warner-affiliated label is dropping other major names from its embattled roster, Chanticleer has signed a new four-year contract, based in part on the continued sales of its immensely popular Christmas recordings. One reason for the ensemble’s huge popularity is its ability to rise above religious sectarianism and deliver a distinctly spiritual sound. “It’s spiritual in the ‘essence of life’ sense,” Chanticleer countertenor and music director Joseph Jennings told the Bohemian two years ago. “And even though so many of our performances are in a church, especially the Christmas program, and even though the music we do is essentially religious in nature, it’s not music of any particular denomination, it’s not done in a religious context. So people have the freedom to let the music speak to them without all the dogmatic trappings of the church, as it were.”

Chanticleer perform Thursday, May 16, at 8pm at St. Vincent de Paul Church, 35 Liberty St., near the corner of Sixth Street and Western Avenue in Petaluma. Tickets are $22-$25 general admission. 415.392.4400.

From the May 2-8, 2002 issue of the North Bay Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

‘The Piano Teacher’


Hot For Teacher: Benoît Magimel and Isabelle Huppert test out the linoleum.

Vienna Roust

Isabelle Huppert goes cruising for a bruising in ‘The Piano Teacher’

By

TThe praise heaped upon Cannes Grand Jury Prize-winner The Piano Teacher is deserved, at least to some extent. As Erika, a spectacularly repressed professor of music, Isabelle Huppert shines in the driest kind of comedy–the kind that in moments can suddenly reverse, become poignant. Watched around the clock, her Erika is as mother-smothered as Norman Bates. Both mother (Annie Girardot) and daughter sleep side by side in a small flat; both are expatriates from France, living off the money Erika makes teaching at the Vienna Conservatory.

Unlike most who sacrifice all for music, Erika manifests no pleasure from it–apart from an almost imperceptible flaring of her nostrils. Sometimes the eyes in that Novocained face liquefy. She might flick out her tongue as if probing a cold sore. The muscles at the corner of the mouth twitch in the ghost of a ghost of a smile, so subtle a spectrograph might miss it.

Fortunately, this chilly, middle-aged woman has a sordid personal life. She’s a compulsive voyeur, a watcher of hardcore porn reels at an adult bookstore. Sometimes Erika sneaks off to peer into cars at a drive-in theater. Her illicit viewings are always accompanied by some compulsive involuntary response: a coughing fit, vomiting, sudden urination. In the film’s money shot, she holds back her urges by taking a razor to the most sensitive part of her anatomy.

The film is directed by Michael Haneke, whose home-invasion film Funny Games had some local success. Here, he really goes after classical music. Generally, films drink in passion for the classics, though there might be an occasional madman or woman–say, David Helfgott in Shine–driven nuts by the piano keyboard. But Haneke proposes a whole class of teachers at the Conservatory whose blood is so frozen they can’t even register the madness of Erika.

Erika’s the worst-case scenario of a teacher. Her real pleasure lies not in hearing a perfect version of some Schubert piece but in bending the fingers of children to a brutal task, as in the repeated shots of hands cruelly splayed and paused over piano keys. It’s the world of classical music as if seen by a deaf person. All the camera really cares about is the unpleasant contortions of the musicians until S&M becomes the metaphor for the creative discipline of a musician studying.

Walter, a good-looking, young romantic (Benoît Magimel) applies for lessons under this forbidding professor. Since he doesn’t fear her, something in her attitude changes, and she decides that he’s the one who could open the secret masochistic rites lurking in her locked-up heart.

Waiting for Erika to blow a gasket is all there is to The Piano Teacher. Just as in a horror movie, you’re assured that the snooty, picked-on intellectual is going to be the one who gets the gun (in this case, a knife). While The Piano Teacher might be dark comedy for those with a hard enough heart, it’s nigh impossible to take the film seriously. Yes, there’s kinky eroticism and devilish humor in the scene where Erika hands over to Walter a densely worded shopping list of unnatural acts. However, The Piano Teacher‘s Grand Jury Prize at Cannes probably wasn’t for comedy.

An art-house audience that found itself liquefied by Bjork’s Little Match Girl performance in Dancer in the Dark may be devastated by this dated movie that’s ultimately the plight of a woman who didn’t agree on a “safe word” before starting up an act of S&M. (During moments like the one with the razor blade, the audience may wish they had a safe word of their own to shout at the screen.) But is it really possible to be as ignorant of the fundaments of S&M today as it might have been in 1983, when the movie’s source novel by Elfriede Jelinek was written? You can’t tell me that a woman as good looking as Isabelle Huppert couldn’t find someone to mistreat her in a city as large and sophisticated as Vienna. Ultimately, Huppert’s vividness, her essential amusement at the part, breaks out of this coffin Haneke tries to construct for Erika.

The Piano Teacher plays at the Rafael Film Center starting Friday, May 3.

From the May 2-8, 2002 issue of the North Bay Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Frank Black

Beach Boys On Acid: Frank Black prays with the Catholics.In the BlackEx-Pixies honcho Frank Black rocks onBy Greg CahillBeck once said in an interview that every song is like its own nation. Ex-Pixies kingpin Frank Black would agree: "It has its own laws," he explains during a phone call from his Los Angeles home. "I really think that's...

Mother’s Day

Thanks, Mom Mom means kitchen, kitchen means love By Sara Bir Where does food come from? Maybe the garden or the grocery store or--God forbid--the 7-11. As for dinner, I know the origins. Dinner comes from Mom.Well, dinner used to come from Mom. That's what, traditionally, Moms do (or did): They fix dinner and pack your lunches. On...

Protest Music

Once We Had Heroes: Neil Young was once king of the protest song; now he's all for "going after Satan." Folksinger Leslie Nuchow (inset) tries to focus on music's healing power. Is Protest Music Dead?Music used to be the dominant voice against war. Now it's easier to shut up and get paid. By Jeff...

Papa’s Taverna

Photograph by Rory McNamaraShake Your Bon Bon: Belly dancer Tina Turrini entertains Papa's patrons.The Good LifePapa has the food and wine, you bring the dancing shoesBy Maria Wood Papa's Taverna, a Greek-American restaurant in Petaluma, is a bit off the beaten path. But that's OK. Patrons here don't look like they're in any hurry to go anywhere.They sit...

Fashion Trends

You're So Vain: Personal decoration can be so rewarding. Little ExtrasIt's what's on the outside that countsBy Gretchen GilesPerhaps it's true that when the Garden gate slammed shut behind him, Adam reached for a fig leaf to cover his nakedness. But it's a darn good bet that Eve touched her bare earlobes, looked down at her naked neckline, and...

Miniature Shoe Artist Raine

Thinking Outside The (Shoe)Box: Raine has a closet full of shoes any (very small) woman would die for.Photograph by Michael AmslerShoe and TellA little shoemaker cobbles together collector's items Unusual occupations breed unusual habits. The jeans-clad woman in the burgundy jacket--the one arranging tiny shoes on the table in preparation for a photo shoot--is a prime example. Known to...

Automobile Pollution

Cough, Cough: Idling your car provides no benefit to you, your car, or the environment. Drivers, Kill Your Engines!As the cars idle, the pollution swellsBy Mari KaneIf idle hands lead to Satan's mischief, imagine the damage done by idling cars. We've all seen it--a chugging, empty vehicle spewing a vortex of fumes in front of a store while its...

‘Murder By Numbers’

Motherly mystery writer takes a stab at 'Murder By Numbers' Writer David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate postfilm conversation. This is not a review; rather, it's a freewheeling, tangential discussion of life, alternative ideas, and popular culture.It is an unnerving experience to read the last two pages of a novel...

Chanticleer

The Singing Dozen: Vocal orchestra Chanticleer sings out strong.Pure BlissChanticleer's 'all consuming' successBy Greg CahillWhen John Tavener first heard the recording of Chanticleer's newly released Lamentations and Praises (Teldec)--the Greek and Russian Orthodox-influenced liturgical drama commissioned from Tavener by the San Francisco-based all-male choir--the acclaimed British composer had an immediate, visceral reaction. "I was staggered by it," he told...

‘The Piano Teacher’

Hot For Teacher: Benoît Magimel and Isabelle Huppert test out the linoleum.Vienna RoustIsabelle Huppert goes cruising for a bruising in 'The Piano Teacher'By TThe praise heaped upon Cannes Grand Jury Prize-winner The Piano Teacher is deserved, at least to some extent. As Erika, a spectacularly repressed professor of music, Isabelle Huppert shines in the driest kind of comedy--the...
11,084FansLike
4,446FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow