Rafael Theater

0

Arts, Etc.

Rafael Theater Reopens

STEPPING THROUGH the glass doors and into the lobby of the newly renovated Rafael Theater is a shocking experience. The surprise is not that the historic building, which has survived fire and neglect in its 80-year history, has been lovingly restored to its 1930s art deco good looks, from the fanciful murals to the chandeliers to the sweeping staircase. The real revelation is that the opulent setting and state-of-the-art technology of the three-screen theater in downtown San Rafael will be used to showcase independent films.

That’s something North Bay film fans have been looking forward to since 1995, when the Film Institute of Northern California, which runs the internationally famous Mill Valley Film Festival, purchased the building from the city of San Rafael.

“In the past, independent films have often been relegated to lesser theaters,” says Mark Fishkin, the Film Institute’s executive director. “The mandate was always to just make do and compromise. But now we have a facility that does them justice.”

The building, located at 1118 Fourth St., was built in 1918 as a first-run movie theater. It was closed by fire in 1937, reopened the next year, and then closed again in 1989. Renovating the historic building cost approximately $6.8 million and involved, among other things, employing San Francisco artist Jeffrey Yunt to restore the art deco murals.

Fishkin says programming at the restored Rafael will include independent U.S. and foreign films, retrospectives, documentaries and shorts, and film-related educational seminars. The theater will be used as an additional venue for the Mill Valley Film Festival, which will still be held primarily in Mill Valley.

The Rafael reopens with a series of events on April 16-18 that includes the world premiere of Alexander Payne’s Election. For details, see Films in the calendar or call 415/383-5256.

From the April 8-14, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Michael Moore

0

Down the Tube

The Awful Truth, speaks volumes.

Michael Moore’s ‘The Awful Truth’ hits the airwaves with predictable fare

By Patrick Sullivan

ONCE UPON A TIME, not so very long ago, a fellow named William Greider wrote a ferocious little book called Who Will Tell the People: The Betrayal of American Democracy. Greider’s thesis was simple: Big corporations exercise growing control over the nation’s media, government, and major political parties, leaving our vaunted democratic system well on the way to being deader than the proverbial doornail.

Then Greider got really nasty. Partly to blame for this state of affairs, he argued, were apparently populist organizations such as unions and activist groups, which are increasingly obsessed with stunts, symbolic protests, and media coverage instead of thoughtful strategy and real organizing.

If Greider’s book opened the ’90s with a bang, then Michael Moore’s new half-hour satirical political television show, The Awful Truth, which premieres April 11 at 6 p.m. on the Bravo Network, closes the decade down with a whimper.

Moore is someone you probably know pretty well by now. He began his unorthodox filmmaking career with the guerrilla documentary Roger & Me, the story of his relentless efforts to confront General Motors chairman Roger Smith with the grim fact that GM’s plant closures had wreaked social devastation on Moore’s hometown of Flint, Mich. The extremely successful film (it was the highest grossing non-concert documentary ever) led to a Moore’s first television show, TV Nation, a short-lived satirical series that turned comic stunts and symbolic confrontations with corporate evildoers into a weekly boob-tube event, first on NBC, then on FOX.

Now Moore is back with more of the same in The Awful Truth. In episode one, Moore leads a gaggle of folks dressed as 17th-century Puritans to Ken Starr’s house to–you guessed it–show the prosecutor a more affordable way to conduct a witch-hunt. Then the Puritans descend in full costume on the halls of Congress, confronting everyone from Henry Hyde to James Carville.

Neither the astonished politicos nor the many civilian bystanders caught on camera know quite what to make of this costume drama, and really, neither do we. There are undeniably funny moments, such as Moore’s close encounter with a sputtering Bob Barr, but ultimately, Moore has nothing to say about Starr and his dubious investigation that hasn’t already been said a million times by Democratic Party spinmeisters. We’re left feeling that the Starr circus is already so bizarre and absurd that Moore’s none-too-subtle efforts at satire pale by comparison.

The second half of the premiere episode is something of an improvement, in part because this time Moore turns his camera on something the media haven’t already talked to death. He focuses on Chris Donahue, a man who has made seven years of health-care payments to the Humana HMO only to be denied a life-saving pancreas operation. The Awful Truth swings into action, planning a funeral for Chris to which Humana’s CEO is invited. The ensuing confrontation between Moore and Donahue (who could, apparently, literally die at any moment) and a Humana PR flack crackles with compelling outrage.

But the conclusion highlights the show’s biggest weakness–Moore himself. Humana relents and Donahue’s life is saved, which is wonderful, but not a word is said about a permanent solution to HMO woes. The unspoken thesis seems to be that these sorts of problems would be licked if only there were only a few more versions of Michael Moore and his camera crew about. And Moore seems to take a little too much pleasure in getting the credit for this rescue operation from a wildly applauding studio audience.

Indeed, throughout the show Moore often exhibits a smug self-righteousness that makes him nearly as unlikable as Kenn Starr or James Carville. The biggest danger for The Awful Truth is that the show will be more about its host than about the people he is trying to help. Maybe William Greider is wrong about stunt activism. Maybe populist television will help save American democracy. Or maybe it will just provide another career boost for left-wing entrepreneurs such as Moore.

Of course, that won’t exactly fit his image as, in the words of Bravo publicists, a “folk hero for the American people.” Those are pretty big shoes to fill, and Moore’s show has a long way to go before it, or he, can walk comfortably in them.

From the April 8-14, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

The Onion

100-Year Itch

By Tom Sullivan



IN THE NOVEL Ordinary Jack, by Helen Cresswell, a young girl named Daisy Parker wreaks havoc through her hobby of “reconciling the seemingly disparate.” History doesn’t record what eventually happens to the child, but with that hobby it’s not impossible that she’s currently working on the staff of The Onion. If so, she was almost certainly heavily involved in the group’s first book, Our Dumb Century (Three Rivers Press; $15).

A satirical weekly newspaper published out of Madison, Wisc., The Onion is not widely distributed in print outside its hometown. But it is available online and reaches an estimated half-million readers a week. The paper’s headlines alone make for enjoyable reading (for instance, “Bantu Tribesman Uses IBM Modem to Crush a Nut” and “Lewinsky Subpoenaed to Re-blow Clinton on Senate Floor: ‘We Must Know Exactly What Happened,’ Say Legislators”).

But as with another notable American publication, most people read The Onion for the articles. The real strengths of the paper are its absurdist sense of humor, its skepticism of official sources and cultural trends, and the discipline and skill with which staff members follow the form and language of newspaper articles. All of these are carried over into Our Dumb Century, which is a collection of Onion front pages from the last 100 years.

The book is divided into five sections: “1900-1929: A Nation Turns Its Crank,” “1929-1946: Dust, Despair and Death: Those Were the Days,” “1946-1963: The Swell Years,” “1963-1981: Peace, Love and Other Bullshit,” and “1981-2000: A Nation Finds Its Remote.” Included are two front pages from most years of the century. Each features articles, slogans, and teasers for tragically unavailable stories inside the paper (from 1932: “Inside: Hoover’s ‘Are You Better Off Now Than You Were Four Years Ago?’ Campaign Fails to Gain Momentum”).

All five are enjoyable and insightful, but the first two sections are the strongest, benefiting from historical hindsight and the mythic qualities of events such as the Depression. The book gets especially fantastic mileage out of the world wars and the race hatred and waste of life that accompanied them, with articles such as “600,000 Killed in 4-Inch Advance on Western Front”; or, from 1918, “Corpse-Eating Rats Now Largest Military Force in Europe.”

In later sections, the book takes careful aim at the Red Scare, with such articles as “New Medical Report Finds Heavy Petting Linked to Communism.” Like the paper itself, these sections pay more attention to social and cultural issues. Articles such as “Disco Diva Gloria Gaynor Survives Andes Plane Crash by Eating Rugby Players” and “Art Critics Call Campbell’s New Tomato Soup ‘Brilliant’: Soup Maker Hailed for Pop Art Commentary on Rampant Commercialism in American Culture” are particularly inspired.

The Onion, as loyal readers know, is the product and property of 131-year-old plutocrat T. Herman Zweibel, and his hand is apparent in the earlier sections of the book, up until his court-ordered retirement in 1958. He contributes a variety of offerings, including an introduction, special coded messages to kids (“You miserable little wretches”), and a selection of trenchant opinion pieces (including, from the Prohibition era, his piece titled “I Can Get All the Booze I Want”). Other recurring themes include a series of cartoons showing Lady Liberty being raped by an evolving pantheon of U.S. enemies, including the Spanish, the Huns, the Japanese, and the hippies, and a series of articles on “the trial of the century,” each using the same law expert and the same text to declare that “never before–and likely never again–has so much public attention been generated by a single court trial in America.”

Especially cynical longtime readers of The Onion have been known to exult over particularly absurd or appalling events, reasoning that, whatever else they may mean, they will provide the paper’s writers with a broad and deserving target to savage with a sniper’s brutal efficiency. From this point of view, if no other, we’re fortunate to have experienced this dumb century.

From the April 8-14, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

The Scoop

Pot Shot

By Bob Harris

NEVER MIND what his own study says, Drug Czar Barry McCaffrey insists that medical marijuana is gonna stay illegal–because it impairs memory, interferes with motor skills, and it impairs memory.

As you already know, voters in seven states have approved the use of marijuana strictly for medical purposes. However, the will of the people notwithstanding, the federal government still thinks letting cancer patients in chemotherapy relieve their pain this way is a crime worthy of imprisonment. Gee, thank God somebody’s trying get these troublemakers off the streets.

Let’s not confuse medical use of marijuana with recreational toking. Casual marijuana abuse can cause serious problems for some people. But that’s not the subject here.

Here’s the thing: An independent report commissioned by McCaffrey’s own Office of National Drug Control Policy has strongly recommended legalization for medical reasons only. McCaffrey’s own investigators say that (a) marijuana’s not particularly addictive; (b) it’s not a gateway to harder drugs; (c) medical use wouldn’t increase casual abuse; and (d) for people in grave condition and real pain, like AIDS patients suffering from wasting syndrome, the medical benefits far outweigh the risks, which are fewer than you get even with many well-known prescription drugs.

Never mind all that. Never mind the insanity of outlawing a substance tried by roughly one quarter of the U.S. population. Never mind the ongoing ludicrous failure of drug prohibition. And never mind the obvious historical example of alcohol prohibition.

The drug czar still insists that anyone putting into practice his own office’s findings will still be subject to arrest.But suppose for a second the study had determined that marijuana was a major public health menace. Do you imagine Gen. McCaffrey would discard it so easily, or would he be waving it proudly as further rationalization for the militarization of drug enforcement?

Dude, why spend our tax dollars on a study if you’re just going to ignore it if it doesn’t find what you want?

I guess because except for cigarettes, alcohol, caffeine, and prescription narcotics, drugs are destroying America.

And they impair memory.

YOU WANNA find out the real media bias in this country? Set something on fire. Let’s digress. If you listen to talk radio, a lot of formerly gelatinous but now merely overweight radio hosts honestly think there’s a pervasive lefty bias to the commercial media. As if the most prominent employees of people like General Electric and Microsoft are secretly reading Mao in their spare time.

Excuse me? Use your eyes and ears. When CNN stands for the Chomsky News Network and competes with EF! The Earth First Channel for ad revenue from Tom’s of Maine, we can resume this discussion. Yet not only are most pundits avowedly conservative, but even reactionary radicals like Ollie North and G. Gordon Liddy, whose open contempt for the law is precisely what made them famous, routinely host national radio and TV talk shows.

Truth is, the real bias of commercial media is: they’re commercial media. Giant media corporations make their money by selling ads to other giant corporations, and any long-term systemic bias exists because it serves that bottom line. Period.

That’s why so many TV shows contain nothing but sex, violence, violent sex, and occasional footage of pit bulls attacking fat people.

A couple of weeks ago, there was a fire in a strip mall in the suburbs near my home in Los Angeles. And the Fox affiliate’s 6 a.m. news show consisted solely of a helicopter shot of the burning building. For an entire hour. Like nothing else mattered in the world. Apparently Beavis is now Channel 11’s news director. “Fire! Huh huh, cool! Huh huh, fire is cool, huh huh …

After which Jillian, the weather chick, caressed the nation’s midsection while wearing a really tight shirt. Then they went back to the fire.

Half these people probably think Edward R. Murrow is that actor who played Jaime Escalante in Stand and Deliver.

So if you’re an activist, next time you want your message to get TV coverage, don’t waste your time coming up with fact sheets and compelling true stories. No one cares anymore. Really. Just hire some fat people to have sex in the street. You’ll have Fox and CNN on the scene in 20 minutes.

Just make sure to give the fat people full-body tattoos with your group’s slogan. It’s the only way to be sure what you have to say will make it into the final story.

From the April 1-7, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Spins

0

New Again

Music reissued, recycled, and reinvented

By Greg Cahill

Lester Bowie Brass Fantasy The Odyssey of Funk & Popular Music Atlantic

For more than 30 years, as a member of the Art Ensemble of Chicago, trumpeter Lester Bowie has helped define avant-jazz in the late 20th century. By fusing elements as diverse as free jazz and New Orleans second-line struts, Bowie and his posse have liberated the genre from the confines of groundless abstraction. As a solo artist, Bowie has fearlessly reinterpreted some of America’s best-known pop songs–his rendition of the Flamingos’ “I Only Have Eyes for You” is a breathtaking deconstruction of that doo-wop chestnut. Unfortunately, Bowie also sometimes masks a lack of musicality under theatrical arrangements that court self-parody. This time out, his 11-piece Brass Fantasy gets mixed results reshaping an odd batch of old and new standards. The more conventional fare–“Don’t Cry for Me, Argentina” and Cole Porter’s “In the Still of the Night”–fall short of Bowie’s previous outings, though they boast some fine trumpet and trombone solos. And his take on the Philly soul hit “If You Don’t Know Me by Now” is somewhat tepid. But Bowie transforms the Spice Girls’ “Two Become One” into a lush after-hours ballad. And shock rocker Marilyn Manson’s “Beautiful People” gets a complete makeover as a rollicking brass-heavy romp that alone is worth the price of admission. Not Bowie’s best, but there are plenty of interesting side trips to recommend this disc.

Dave Van Ronk Sunday Street Philo

Forget all those tea-sipping neo-folkies. Dave Van Ronk–whose bawdy, gruff vocals, tender sentiments, and heavenly finger-picking made him one of the finest song interpreters to emerge from the ’60s folk-blues revival–created this newly reissued masterpiece in 1974. Part devil. Part Angel. He’s the perfect antidote to all that cute, cuddly Joni Mitchell-wannabe shlock beamed ceaselessly over NPR. Catch him April 21 at the Blue Heron in Duncans Mills.

Clarence “Gatemouth” Brown Blackjack Sugar Hill

This Texas bluesman–who released a great swing album two years ago–is one of those round-peg-in-a-square-hole types: a black cowboy equally adept at guitar and fiddle, and equally comfortable playing blues, jazz, and country. This 1977 reissue, first released on the obscure Real Records label, is the quintessential Gatemouth Brown CD–a little bit country, a little bit jazzy, a whole lot bluesy, and filled with drop-dead virtuoso guitar, fiddle, and harmonica. Don’t fence him in.

The Mahavishnu Orchestra with John McLaughlin The Inner Mounting Flame Columbia/Mobile Fidelity

This seminal ’70s jazz fusion recording blazed a path for Carlos Santana, Return to Forever, and a host of other astral travelers. McLaughlin, who seldom (if ever) performs this material these days (splitting his time between classical guitar and traditional jazz), scratched out some damned coarse, and funky, licks as he traded riffs with electric violinist Jerry Goodman, drummer Billy Cobham, and synthesist Jan Hammer. It’s remarkable how fresh this sounds today, though that should come as no surprise given the bland nature of so-called contemporary jazz on the airwaves. The drum and bass tracks seem to suffer from the distortion inherent in the technology of the times, but otherwise Sebastopol-based Mobile Fidelity should be commended for bringing this one back.

Sandy Bull Re-inventions Vanguard

Here’s the ’60s folk guitar master replete with spontaneous instrumental guitar improvisations, oud doodles, bossa nova blues, and classical five-string banjo impressions–including his patented “Carmina Burana Fantasy”–all gloriously restored, remastered, and reissued on this new anthology. Did someone say eclectic?

Pick of the Week

John Coltrane and Johnny Hartman MCA/Impulse!/Mobile Fidelity

This self-titled audiophile disc spotlights the classic 1963 pairing of tenor saxman John Coltrane and jazz vocalist Johnny Hartman–backed by pianist McCoy Tyner, bassist Jimmy Garrison, and drummer Elvin Jones–in a gorgeous session that showcases two of the greatest interpreters of ballads, including the anthem of the Cocktail Nation, Billy Strayhorn’s “Lush Life.” It’s 4 a.m. forever. Essential stuff for any jazz buff.

From the April 1-7, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Wine Grape Shortage

0

Last Drop

By Bob Johnson

IF PAULA COLE lived in Sonoma County, rather than singing about cowboys, her lyrical lament might well be: “Where have all the wine grapes gone?” Even though the 1998 harvest was the second largest on record in the Sonoma/Marin region, according to a preliminary report issued by the California Department of Food and Agriculture, there is a critical shortage of quality wine grapes in the county.

One consequence of the shortage is likely to hit consumers where it hurts the most: in their wallets.

Some 132,715 tons of grapes were harvested in Sonoma County last fall. That’s about 5,000 more tons than the 1996 crush produced, but well under 1997’s record 187,725-ton yield. And with most 1997 white wines now on the market and selling briskly, wineries, distributors, and retailers are bracing for an extremely tight market once the more limited 1998 wines have evolved sufficiently to bottle and release.

“We’re experiencing a 30 percent growth trend over last year,” says George Rose, public relations director for Clos du Bois Winery. “We’re convinced that consumers are now recognizing the connection [between] Sonoma County-appellation wines and quality.”

What has spawned the upsurge of interest in local wines? Rick Theis, until recently the executive director of the Sonoma County Grape Growers Association, says the region’s reputation has been slowly building over the past decade and a half.

“Fifteen years ago, people wouldn’t have thought about looking for a Sonoma County wine first,” Theis says. “But by educating the public about how the county produces more award-winning wines than any other region in California each year, our reputation has spread.”

Toss in marketing efforts by the county’s association of wineries, along with national radio and TV campaigns by Clos du Bois and Gallo that put the Sonoma County image in the spotlight, and a case could be made that local wines now enjoy star status similar to that of their liquid cousins from Napa Valley.

Besides consumer demand, another factor is fueling the county’s grape shortage: big business. “A few very large wineries are buying as much fruit as possible, leaving everyone else to fight for what they can get,” observes Rod Berglund, winemaker for Joseph Swan Vineyards.

“The demand seems to be pretty much across the board,” Berglund adds. “Russian River Valley and coastal pinot noir is virtually unavailable on the open market at any price. Ditto for zinfandel–any appellation, and especially old vine. Petite sirah and other once-common varietals are almost gone and in great demand. Chardonnay continues to be strong. And newer varietals–such as syrah, pinot gris, and viognier–are already at ridiculous [high price] levels.”

Adds Berglund: “In some cases we may be near the [pricing] limit, but in the case of Russian River pinot, for instance, it seems as if the bidding has only begun.”

Theis agrees. Although some mega-wineries may deplete supplies by purchasing a great deal of the available fruit, Theis says, it is the consumer who ultimately determines the price of a wine. “People desire things–be it wine or anything else–that are of extremely high quality and hard to get,” he says. “It’s just human nature, and it’s also the nature of the wine business. I’ve talked to retailers who say that consumer demand for Sonoma County pinot noir is such that wineries could charge whatever they want for it. Supply and demand is what sets the [price] bar, and as long as the economy stays strong, that bar is going to go higher.”

Adding to the demand for local grapes is the discovery by winemakers from outside the county’s borders that, as Berglund puts it, “a little bit of Sonoma County fruit can go a long way toward improving an otherwise insipid blend.”

OTHER FACTORS include grape growers who decide to become winemakers, thus cutting off or severely limiting supplies to long-established winery clients; the evolving palates of U.S. wine drinkers; and a surge in exports.

“American consumers are moving upscale to high-end varietal wines,” says industry analyst Jon Fredrikson. “They’re shifting their preferences away from many white and blush jug wines, [the sales of which] declined in food stores last year.”

As for worldwide demand for U.S. wines, preliminary numbers from the Department of Commerce put the value of American vino exports–90 percent of which come from California–in 1998 at $537 million, a 26 percent increase over 1997. And a growing percentage of California exports hail from Sonoma County.

What is it that makes these homegrown grapes and wines so sought-after?

Berglund explains it this way: “Grapes from Sonoma County have an uncommon depth of flavor, excellent natural balance, and tremendous diversity, while still retaining a sense of place. There is, in this county, some place that will grow virtually every varietal, and it can be as good as almost anywhere else it is grown, at least in the New World.”

Theis concurs. “In many ways, we’ve become the victims of our own success,” he says of the county’s premium-wine grape shortage.

From the April 1-7, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

The Birthday Party

Party Time

The Birthday Party.

‘Birthday Party’ features eerie presence

By Daedalus Howell

ONCE EMBEDDED in the paws of pedestrian theater pundits, Harold Pinter’s splinters persist on the floorboards of Sonoma County Rep in Sebastopol in its splendid production of his “comedy of menace,” The Birthday Party.

Originally staged in 1958, the play was panned by critics but survived to herald a new era in theater and a 40-year career for its author. It’s not populist theater by any means, and SCR should be lauded for encouraging this much-needed stretch for Sonoma County audiences. If Pinter chucked a monkey wrench into the mundane, director Scott Philips gives it real torque. His production is a taut, lean triumph for local stages.

Welcome to Meg and Petey’s south of England boarding house. The dreary, lower-middle-class interiors are juxtaposed to genial hostess Meg’s (Peggy Van Patten) obsession with pleasing her guest, the nebbishy, bespectacled Stan (Cameron McVeigh), whose impending birthday party proves an occasion for disaster.

The guest list includes Lulu (Kori Krehbiel), a dangerously flirty neighbor, as well as the mysterious Goldberg (Eric Thompson) and McCann (Allan Armstrong), who breeze into town on some undisclosed but dubious business with the hapless Stan. This unlikely bunch leads the play to a second-act crescendo of such psychological weirdness that Freud himself would have to lie down on the couch and suck dumbly on his cigar.

McVeigh’s uncanny ability to portray Stan’s emotional poverty while keeping a tenuous hold on his identity is this production’s finest asset. By turns wearied and worried, Stan is on the brink–a condemned man who, without pretense or moralizing, is unable to fully resign himself to his fate with Goldberg and McCann, whatever that may be. This indomitable flicker of humanity, perhaps more an innate survival mechanism than lofty heroism, is brilliantly presented by the actor. Despite himself, Stan resists succumbing, and when he finally does, it is with complete erasure of the self. McVeigh conveys the existential gravity of his character’s fate with only the slightest gesture. It’s his party and he’ll cry if he wants to, damn it.

Peggy Van Patten is also well cast as the intolerably chipper matron. Her zealous dispatching of breakfast cereal and maternal doting on surrogate son Stan proves a comic menace unto itself. Her naiveté is compounded by her cloying determination to make others happy, resulting in further upset and increased efforts to please. Meg’s husband, Petey (William Harrison), proves the perfect understated foil for the bombastic hostess.

Emissaries from Stan’s dark past, Goldberg and McCann are like bullying orderlies sans the white coats. In the actors’ hands, the gruesome twosome are a sort of revved-up Kray Brothers endowed with a flair for semantics. Thompson proves a particularly agile performer during the play’s signature interrogation sequence when his face literally changes color in synch with his various emotions.

Indeed, this truly eerie scene is a good example of what makes this production of The Birthday Party so special–a happy conflux of great material and estimable local talents. Party on.

The Birthday Party plays through April 17 at Sonoma County Rep, 104 N. Main St., Sebastopol. $12. 544-7278.

From the April 1-7, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Talking Pictures

0

Shallow Water

H2O: Treat Williams and Michelle Pfeiffer star in The Deep End of the Ocean.

Michael Chabon muses on bad art and ‘The Deep End of the Ocean’

By David Templeton

Writer David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This column is not a movie review; rather, it’s a freewheeling exploration of art, alternative ideas, and popular culture.

IF THE DEEP END of the Ocean makes any money at all,” professes author Michael Chabon, sliding into a battered wooden chair at a bustling coffeehouse in downtown Berkeley, “it will only be because of Michelle Pfeiffer.

“That,” he adds quickly, “and because the idea of the movie is so compelling.”

Indeed. In Deep End of the Ocean–adapted from the widely read novel by Jacquelyn Mitchard–Pfeiffer plays a middle-class mother of three picture-perfect children. When her 3-year-old son is snatched from a crowded hotel lobby–not to be seen again for nine years–the mother all but loses her mind under the weight of grief, depression, and guilt. The patiently simmering father is played by Treat Williams, and Whoopi Goldberg shows up from time to time as a tough-talking, lesbian detective/grief counselor.

Tragically, this all sounds far more compelling than it is; somehow the filmmakers (led by the usually excellent director Ulu Grosbard and screenwriter Steven Schiff, a former Vanity Fair film critic) have so flattened and muffled their subject that they’ve ended up with a subdued, sappy, frequently boring film that constantly seems to be examining the least interesting, most mundane aspects of its own story. Worst of all, they’ve hosed away most of the disturbing ironies that made the book’s second half so provocative.

Which brings us to Michael Chabon, quite possibly our reigning modern master of “disturbing ironies.” With Mysteries of Pittsburgh and Wonder Boys, the critically acclaimed author has made a career of writing tales that are the full reverse of “mundane” and “uninteresting.” His characters, often troubled, usually endearing, come fully marinated in an eloquent sauce of idiosyncratic quirkiness. In his latest, Werewolves in Their Youth, Chabon has assembled nine astonishing short stories that work like literary appetizers, instilling a hunger for more of the same.

I recommend the main-course theatrics of Wonder Boys (one of my favorite books of the 1990s), a novel about bad timing, artistic failure, and a very strange case of writer’s block. We’ll soon see if Hollywood can pass the Irony Test when it attempts to transform Wonder Boys‘ “screwball tragedy” into a big-screen treat; the film version of Chabon’s book–starring Michael Douglas–is currently filming and will be released next year.

“I’m excited about it,” Chabon admits, somewhat sheepishly. “In spite of how I tend to feel about Hollywood movies, I do have high hopes for Wonder Boys.”

Chabon stops a moment to chat with a student–he’s teaching a writing class this semester at St. Mary’s College in Berkeley–then turns his attention back to The Deep End of the Ocean.

“I have to say, as the parent of two children,” he muses, “even though I was resisting the movie almost from the start–mainly because it wasn’t very good–I still couldn’t help but be upset when the kid disappeared.

“It’s impossible not to start thinking, ‘Oh my God, I’ve done that a million times with my own kid; I’ve been in some crowded place and I’ve looked away for one second.’ That’s a real nightmare. And it hasn’t been dramatized all that many times in movies. It’s really a relatively recent thing, isn’t it, all these missing children? Isn’t it only in the last 20 years or so, that kids’ faces have been turning up on milk cartons?”

TRY 14 YEARS. According to the National Center for Missing Children, the first public-service announcement featuring the photo of a missing child appeared Jan. 1, 1985, part of an experimental campaign sponsored by Melody Farms of Illinois.

“Still, it’s hard to remember a time when there weren’t faces on milk cartons,” I admit.

“It’s pretty sad,” Chabon nods. “It’s sad that those faces on milk cartons have become such an ingrained part of our culture. Again, as a parent, it’s a frightening thought. The whole subject of missing children is such a visceral one. It’s instantly kind of chilling just to think about.

“Which goes back to what amazes me about the movie,” he adds. “That they could blunt a story as powerful as this to the degree that they blunted it. It could have been great, but in the end it’s just another bad movie.”

“Doesn’t it bother you that bad art can become so popular?” I want to know. “Most of the New York Times bestsellers are pulp. Even with movies. Patch Adams was awful, but it made a fortune. Armageddon made a fortune. And Deep End of the Ocean will probably make money, too.” (On this point, it turns out, I’m dead wrong; at the box office, Deep End has been sinking like a brick.)

“Well, I suppose it does bother me that bad art is so eagerly embraced by the public,” Chabon allows. “But still, there are plenty of people out there who are buying and reading really good books, people who are going to the movies to see quality films. It’s just that there are no New York Times bestseller lists devoted to those specific people.”

“There’s a common theory among us culture snobs,” I say, “that this would be a better world if we all had higher tastes, if shows like Hollywood Squares featured brilliant writers instead of sitcom stars. As a culture, wouldn’t we be better people if we all read better books?”

“Oh, probably not, actually,” Chabon replies. “We’d just be more literate jerks. We’d just be well-read moral weaklings. As for Hollywood Squares, I don’t think novelists and short-story writers would be a good idea.

“The ironic thing,” he concludes, with a smile, “is that most writers are very boring people.”

From the April 1-7, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Spalding Gray

Word Play

Shades of Gray: Monologue man Spalding Gray turns the bare stage into a “theater of the mind” with his deeply personal performances.

Monologuist Spalding Gray focuses on the future

By Patrick Sullivan

ONE OF THE FEW times I am not aware of time-slash-death–I equate them–is when I’m performing,” explains Spalding Gray, his voice lingering on the word death a bit mournfully. “The other times are skiing and good sex. Those three pretty much hold up–they’re my ecstatic states.”

The actor, writer, and performer, speaking from his home in Sag Harbor, Long Island, pauses for a moment.

“If I didn’t still have that in performing, that timeless moment at the table, I wouldn’t have much impetus to go out there,” he continues.

For some two decades now, Spalding Gray has reigned as America’s master of the monologue, delivering his edgy, artfully confessional stories on stages across the country while seated comfortably behind his trademark wooden table. Along the way, Gray, who appears April 10 at the Luther Burbank Center, has also found time to build careers as an author and a movie actor. Perhaps best known for the Obie Award-winning Swimming to Cambodia–his 1987 monologue about the making of the Oscar-winning film The Killing Fields, in which he had a supporting role–Gray has also written the novel Impossible Vacations and appeared in such movies as Beyond Rangoon and Diabolique.

Monologues, however, remain the performer’s main concern. These solo shows have been captured on film by such notable directors as Jonathan Demme, but Gray recommends seeing his work live. “There’s a huge difference,” he says. “The most radical act that I do, if you talk about my performances being radical, is being present as much as possible, going out on the road and being in the room. Because it’s that ‘being there’ that establishes a rapport with the audience.”

To the uninitiated, Gray’s art sounds simpler than it actually is. In essence, he takes his personal experiences and brings them vividly to life on a nearly naked stage, weaving a web of words that pulls in everything from political observations to character studies to intimate scrutinies of his own emotional landscape. Gray is comic without being a mere comedian, dramatic without being a mere actor, and deeply compelling without needing a supporting cast or any more props than a glass of water, a microphone, and perhaps a map of Southeast Asia.

“It’s theater of the mind in which, if it’s working for the audience, they’re imagining their own version of what I’m saying,” Gray says.

His solo pieces, begun in 1979 and now numbering 19, have covered a gamut of deeply personal subjects, from the youthful experiences captured in Sex and Death to the Age 14 to the trying-to-write-a-book angst of Monster in a Box. Through all this work run Gray’s grim fears about the passage of time: “Good morning,” he once imagined his mirror saying to him. “You are going to die.”

By comparison, Gray’s most recent monologue sounds positively mellow. Morning, Noon, and Night focuses on a day spent with his family in their new home on Long Island. The piece chronicles the new life that Gray, now 57, began after his recent divorce, the far-more-harrowing tale of which he relates in It’s a Slippery Slope, the monologue he will perform at the LBC.

Controversy over It’s a Slippery Slope was perhaps inevitable. First of all, as Gray himself notes, the work marked a new direction in style.

“I think that where this is a watershed piece is that up until Slippery Slope I had always managed to get the audience to go along with me into a mother’s relationship to a needy child,” Gray explains. “So I was always crying out, ‘Oh, oh, help me, I’m drowning. Look at me, look at what happened to me.’ In Slippery Slope, I twisted it and said, ‘Look what I did.’ “

What Gray did was leave Renee Shafransky, his wife and his longtime collaborator, to marry a woman with whom he had been having an affair for many years. In the 90-minute Slippery Slope, Gray interweaves this experience with an account of his decision to lay aside his fear of death and plunge into downhill skiing.

The piece has generally won acclaim, but a few critics were outraged by what they saw as an artful attempt to excuse the performer’s real-life bad behavior. To that criticism, Gray responds heatedly.

“But it’s they who are excusing it,” he says. “They don’t have to. I’m not even sure what that means, because I’m taking blame for what I did. And I’m saying that in the piece. If I’m manipulating the audience to forgive me, then maybe I’m doing that and I don’t know it.”

All this confusion and confession may evoke images of television’s cheatin’ hearts pouring out their guts to Jerry Springer. Not surprisingly, Gray finds such comparisons distasteful, but he also thinks that what he deplores as the contemporary “culture of confession” is a bastardization of his own work, the artless product of a sort of reverse cultural evolution.

“I think the Monica Lewinsky interview [with Barbara Walters] was the apotheosis of what I started doing and what led into Jerry Springer and confessional talk shows,” Gray says. “It’s a very interesting cultural thing to observe, because it really has been the final blowout of any idea of privacy in America.”

Indeed, Gray seems deeply disgusted by media coverage of the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal: “All I’m saying is that whatever that arc has been since the 1970s has reached its culmination in Barbara Walters’ show,” he says. “Barbara was a leering, prurient vampire. The only thing she didn’t ask was, ‘Could you fit it all in your mouth?’ “

Partly in response to this disgust, Gray’s own life and work have taken a new direction. For one thing, the eternal observer has now plunged into the local politics of his new hometown, where he moved after his divorce, to collaborate with local activists working to shut down a nearby nuclear power plant. His involvement is largely motivated by the fear that his children will be victims of what he calls “this very dirty plant.”

His monologues, he says, are also changing. Gray’s onstage persona has often seemed slightly adolescent, alternating between sly wit and wide-eyed innocence. With age and family has come a different attitude.

“I see an interesting growth that in some ways has paralleled my maturity as an adult,” Gray says. “[My monologues] started out very innocent and distant. Now they’ve evolved into much more of the adult figure talking about his life. There’s a lot more heart in them and less irony since I’ve had the children, and also a more sober adult voice, a voice that’s talking about the emotion of loss and aging. They’ve gone from kind of adolescent to mid-range to a mature person.”

Spalding Gray performs It’s A Slippery Slope on Saturday, April 10, at 8 p.m. at the Luther Burbank Center, 50 Mark West Springs Road, Santa Rosa. Tickets are $18. For details, call 546-3600.

From the April 1-7, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Anti-Abortion Sex Ed

0

The Right Choice?

Michael Amsler



Anti-abortion groups are teaching sex ed in local public schools

By Janet Wells

WHEN VIVIANE Isabeau signed a permission slip for her 13-year-old daughter to attend a Family Life unit as part of seventh-grade sex education at Mountain Shadows Middle School in Rohnert Park, she thought, “Fine, I have no problem with my kid learning about biology and human reproduction.”

But Isabeau wasn’t so sanguine when she discovered that the four-part course was taught by a Santa Rosa-based anti-abortion group with ties to the Christian right.

“There’s supposed to be a separation of church and state,” Isabeau says. “If [the National Organization of Women] came in to do a program, there’s no way they would have gotten past the school board. They would have found them too radical.

“My feeling is this group is just as radical.”

Yet the Pregnancy Counseling Center of Sonoma County teaches its “Let’s Take Another Look” program, covering such topics as reproduction, sexually transmitted diseases, dating, and peer pressure, at such area schools as Mountain Shadows in Rohnert Park, Willowside Middle School in Santa Rosa, Casa Grande High School in Petaluma, and Healdsburg Junior High School.

PCC, which also offers free pregnancy tests, counseling, and childbirth classes, “does a very excellent scientific presentation,” says Mountain Shadows principal Lou Colby, adding that there had been no complaints from parents in the five years that the program has been offered to seventh graders as part of the Health/Science curriculum.

That is until Isabeau’s daughter, Sophie, came home from class a few weeks ago and asked, “Mom, do you know what they’re teaching us in this class?”

In a 50-minute session titled “I’m Worth Waiting For,” PCC volunteer teacher Beth Perkins uses interactive games to talk about the risks and pressures related to sexual activity, and “invites” students in Gerry Shimazu’s Mountain Shadows science class to “save their most precious gift of sexuality for marriage or a lifetime-committed relationship.”

In one exercise, Perkins instructs every boy in class to roll up a sleeve. She then holds up a piece of masking tape and, slapping it on one student’s arm, explains that it represents “Mary, a young woman who has the goal of someday getting married and having a family.

“Mary was pressured into having sexual relations with Adam. They had a fight, and” –Perkins rips the tape off Adam’s arm–“then they break up.” Perkins holds the tape up for the giggling students to see and says, “You can see a lot of Adam on this tape.

“Now Mary goes to college and dates Kyle,” she continues, rubbing the piece of tape onto another boy’s arm. “They break up,” she says, tearing the tape off again. “It didn’t hurt as much, did it? Now Mary meets the guy she really wants to marry,” Perkins says, placing the tape on a third boy, then lifting it off. “And it hardly sticks at all,” she says. “The problem is she has a bit of Adam and Kyle stuck to her.” Then Perkins asks, “How many of you guys would like to have a lifetime committed relationship with a girl who gave away her greatest gift to a guy who was drunk and she was drunk; or, girls, to a guy who thinks about pornography?”

How “Mary” goes from being sexually active to tangled in alcohol and pornography is unclear, but Perkins does offer consolation for those who have “already opened their gift of sexuality”:

“You will never be a physical virgin again, but you can wrap the package back up and save it for your intended life partner. It is called renewed virginity,” she says. “If you do that you will be reducing the risk to zero of unplanned pregnancy or STDs.”

Isabeau, who attended her daughter’s “I’m Worth Waiting For” session, finds PCCs presentation “kind of creepy, using language that sounds politically correct” to mask a hidden agenda, she says.

“The emphasis on saving yourself for marriage, that’s hard to object to. No one’s advocating sex for a 13-year-old,” Isabeau says. “But there’s an implication of man-woman, Judeo-Christian [marriage], with no discussion of options outside of marriage.

“What bothered me is who these people are behind the scenes,” she adds. “It seems like the school knows nothing about this group. The stuff just sounded good on the surface.”

A TEACHER who is no longer at Mountain Shadows apparently advocated bringing in PCC several years ago, and it seems that the program has been rubber-stamped ever since without much scrutiny. The Pregnancy Counseling Center was even listed incorrectly on the parental permission clip as the “Pregnancy Council of Sonoma County.”

Principal Colby, who came out of retirement in September to take over at Mountain Shadows, acknowledges that she automatically approved the agreement with PCC based on positive feedback from teachers and parents. The school, with board approval, pays $50 for the program, which covers the cost of presentation materials for about 300 seventh graders each year.

PCC’s mission statement is “to encourage young people to a sex-free lifestyle until they are in a committed relationship,” says Debby Hooks, PCC’s director of education. “We’re a non-profit organization with no political or denominational leaning. … We get funding primarily from individuals and businesses.”

When pressed for more specifics about funding sources and Christian ties, Hooks demurs, directing questions to the group’s executive director, Donna Cornell. In a recent story about post-abortion counseling, Cornell told the Independent that PCC uses a 12-week Bible study in its counseling and recruits volunteers from local churches. While Cornell downplays the group’s pro-life stance, PCC will not provide abortion referrals.

Also, PCC distributes to students a brochure put out by Focus on the Family, a controversial group profiled March 18 in a Rolling Stone article on the Christian right. A stalwart of the anti-homosexual campaign, Focus on the Family was founded more than 20 years ago in Arcadia, Calif., by James Dobson, a child psychologist and author of a book advocating corporal punishment for children. According to Rolling Stone, the group, now a “sprawling empire” in Colorado Springs, has grown into a $109 million-a year-ministry employing 1,300 people who produce a dozen different radio and television broadcasts, 14 publications, and a wide range of films and videos.

Mountain Shadows seventh graders received Focus on the Family’s “The First Nine Months” brochure, which, Isabeau notes, employs the same well-known photographs of fetal development, by Lennart Nilsson, as the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue uses on its website. “Here’s this church-funded right-wing group coming into our schools under the guise of sex education class,” Isabeau says of Focus on the Family. “It’s basically a Bible-thumping organization that wants to deny women, people of color, and gays their rights.”

But PCC uses materials from many different organizations, Hooks says. “We get brochures from AIDS [advocacy] groups, whatever brochure has the information. Focus on the Family just happens to give it out. All it is, is a factual brochure on the different stages of development–nothing political,” she adds. “That’s what our aim is, to present the facts.”

MANY PUBLIC schools bring in outside groups to help teach portions of science and health classes, including the abstinence-based curriculum mandated by the state for seventh-grade sex education. Planned Parenthood, which has long been at the forefront of the pro-choice movement, charges $35 an hour ($15 less than PCC), plus mileage, for education presentations, and even reduces or waives fees for many schools.

“I have problems with PCC coming into the schools, mainly because they have a particular agenda, and it’s often disrespectful of others’ beliefs,” says Toni Guy, vice president of education for Planned Parenthood Golden Gate, which has contracts for sex education presentations at Comstock and Cook Middle schools in Santa Rosa, Petaluma Jr. High School, Altimira Middle School in Sonoma, and Creekside Middle School in Rohnert Park. “Some schools hear ‘Planned Parenthood’ and say, ‘No way.’ They see the name as controversial and know that anti-choice parents will raise the roof,” Guy says.

“Planned Parenthood has been doing this for 75 years,” she adds. “My staff are all trained sexuality educators. We want professionals, people who go in there and do not bring their personal agendas. The information needs to be free of bias, needs to be respectful and age appropriate.”

“We’re very careful with our language. We try very hard not to have a particular slant,” says Guy, referring to PCC’s use of a “sexually pure” category on a handout directing seventh graders to rank qualities that they might look for in themselves or a partner. “That to me has religious overtones. … Does it say that sex makes someone impure?”

In response to complaints from Isabeau and several other parents, Mountain Shadows administrators now are looking into PCC’s curriculum. “It’s what’s not talked about that I find objectionable,” Isabeau says. “What I want is dialogue, and that’s not what’s happening [at PCC’s sex-ed classes].”

From the April 1-7, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Rafael Theater

Arts, Etc. Rafael Theater Reopens STEPPING THROUGH the glass doors and into the lobby of the newly renovated Rafael Theater is a shocking experience. The surprise is not that the historic building, which has survived fire and neglect in its 80-year history, has been lovingly restored to its 1930s art deco good...

Michael Moore

Down the Tube The Awful Truth, speaks volumes. Michael Moore's 'The Awful Truth' hits the airwaves with predictable fare By Patrick Sullivan ONCE UPON A TIME, not so very long ago, a fellow named William Greider wrote a ferocious little book called Who Will Tell the People: The Betrayal of American Democracy. Greider's thesis was...

The Onion

100-Year Itch By Tom Sullivan IN THE NOVEL Ordinary Jack, by Helen Cresswell, a young girl named Daisy Parker wreaks havoc through her hobby of "reconciling the seemingly disparate." History doesn't record what eventually happens to the child, but with that hobby it's not impossible that she's currently working on the staff of The Onion....

The Scoop

Pot Shot By Bob Harris NEVER MIND what his own study says, Drug Czar Barry McCaffrey insists that medical marijuana is gonna stay illegal--because it impairs memory, interferes with motor skills, and it impairs memory. As you already know, voters in seven states have approved the use of marijuana strictly for medical purposes. However, the...

Spins

New Again Music reissued, recycled, and reinvented By Greg Cahill Lester Bowie Brass Fantasy The Odyssey of Funk & Popular Music Atlantic For more than 30 years, as a member of the Art Ensemble of Chicago, trumpeter Lester Bowie has helped define avant-jazz in the late 20th century. By fusing elements as diverse...

Wine Grape Shortage

Last Drop By Bob Johnson IF PAULA COLE lived in Sonoma County, rather than singing about cowboys, her lyrical lament might well be: "Where have all the wine grapes gone?" Even though the 1998 harvest was the second largest on record in the Sonoma/Marin region, according to a preliminary report issued by the California Department of...

The Birthday Party

Party Time The Birthday Party. 'Birthday Party' features eerie presence By Daedalus Howell ONCE EMBEDDED in the paws of pedestrian theater pundits, Harold Pinter's splinters persist on the floorboards of Sonoma County Rep in Sebastopol in its splendid production of his "comedy of menace," The Birthday Party. Originally staged in 1958, the play was panned...

Talking Pictures

Shallow Water H2O: Treat Williams and Michelle Pfeiffer star in The Deep End of the Ocean. Michael Chabon muses on bad art and 'The Deep End of the Ocean' By David Templeton Writer David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This column is...

Spalding Gray

Word Play Shades of Gray: Monologue man Spalding Gray turns the bare stage into a "theater of the mind" with his deeply personal performances. Monologuist Spalding Gray focuses on the future By Patrick Sullivan ONE OF THE FEW times I am not aware of time-slash-death--I equate them--is when I'm performing," explains Spalding Gray, his...

Anti-Abortion Sex Ed

The Right Choice? Michael Amsler Anti-abortion groups are teaching sex ed in local public schools By Janet Wells WHEN VIVIANE Isabeau signed a permission slip for her 13-year-old daughter to attend a Family Life unit as part of seventh-grade sex education at Mountain Shadows Middle School in Rohnert Park, she thought, "Fine, I...
11,084FansLike
4,606FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow