Letters to the Editor

02.27.08

Chickie-nobs®

Although Joy Lanzendorfer’s article “Replicant Repasts” (Feb. 20), didn’t encourage the cloning of meat, it completely failed to mention perhaps the most detrimental effect of the FDA’s approval of cloned meat in our nation’s food supply. Yes, small farms would suffer; yes, there could be health risks. But the biggest problem will be with the nature of this decision’s consequences on diversity. As recently explained by Verlyn Klinkenborg of the New York Times, this decision has nothing to do with the well-being of consumers or Mother Nature, but rather the large meat-industry corporations. “[They] would like it best if chickens grew in the shape of nuggets,” Klinkenborg wrote.

With money-hungry corporations in control, the most economically sound breeds will prevail, leaving all others in the dust—and the genetic diversity can only narrow. This decision is only the beginning of a quick downward spiral to not just a single breed of each animal, but a single genetic makeup. One by one the animal breeds will disappear, leaving consumers with less and less choice, and our once-rich-with-diversity farm animal kingdom poorer and poorer. Imagine living in a world where every steak tastes exactly the same as the next because every cow has the exact same genetic makeup as the next. This landmark decision is opening doors for money-hungry corporations and closing doors for citizens and Mother Nature. If we don’t act immediately to protect our planet’s diversity, there will be no turning back.

Emma McDonell, age 17

Sebastopol

Good Grief, Man!

Good grief, Templeton! Men dressed as nuns are not funny (“Sisters of Dreary,” stage review, Feb. 20). What’s more, women dressed as nuns—old-fashioned, habit-wearing nuns—are not funny. That was then. This is now. Get over it! The reason this production “presents a new low in high camp” is because the set-up is ho-hum with a zero punch line. Nunsense had a decent run. But it’s over. Move on.

Michael McCauley

Woodacre

Humane death ha, ha

I appreciated Christina Waters’ article about the “back to the pasture” movement (“The Meat of the Matter,” Feb. 20). I have been a vegetarian for 15 years now, but I am heartened that there are ranchers and farmers who are improving the lives of farm animals by raising them in a more humane fashion than the large, intensive factory farms do. And I am glad that better options (local, more humanely raised) exist.

There was one part about how animals are “taken to a family-run slaughterhouse and dispatched as humanely as they were raised.” I am sure that those pigs lived a far better life than their counterparts in factory farms, but I doubt that they were “humanely” killed. Most slaughterhouses, even small ones, use the same practice when killing animals. They are hung upside down by one leg, have their throats slit and then bleed to death while still conscious. It is a painful, terrifying and violent death.

I hope that while people choose a more humane option (and I am truly glad that they can), they don’t delude themselves into believing that the animal died a “humane” death. I also suggest that they contact farmers directly to ask for details on how the animals that they are eating are raised, transported and killed.

Rachel Cadman

Santa Cruz

Dept. of corrections

In our heated rush to convey immediate wisdom about the Sonoma Meat Buying Club and perhaps sway certain check-book-wielding family members that it was a great idea for journalists and artists and students to have rockin’ meat monthly delivered in a cool designer bag avec beurre, we evidently made a few teeny tiny errors (“Meat the Makers” sidebar, Feb. 20).[Marker]

Sonoma Direct president Marissa Guggiana gently points out that not all the meat from local ranchers is certified organic; evidently, one side of the phone interview was operating on wishes and sloth. She further refutes our sloppy assertion that she thought the whole darned thing up and then UC Davis just came rushing over to help. Rather, the University of California had the idea first. Guggiana was delighted to help. As always, apologies and etceteras rain down.

The Ed.

distinctly meat-headed


High Above It

02.27.08

B ecause buildings are responsible for a vast amount of our daily CO2 emissions and have a larger impact on the environment than any other single element, high-density building and energy efficiency are a driving force behind architect Steve Sheldon’s vision of housing for a sustainable future. According to Sheldon, designer of the Florence Lofts, a new green complex in Sebastopol, sustainability in this case means getting to a point where the building project can sustain itself, ideally producing its own electricity and existing as a carbon-neutral zone.

As Sheldon gives me a tour of the property, I press him to further define sustainability. He explains that, in his view, the heart of sustainability is density. We need to limit traffic and movement by focusing on our urban environment, leaving our remaining open space undestroyed. The urban areas are for living, and should be used as such. For this reason, the 1.1 acres that contain the Florence Lofts are built to the maximum density allowed by town dictum. There are 12 live/work townhouses with an adjoining commercial building that contains retail, office space and a restaurant. Because the site sits just five blocks from downtown, and each of the living units includes a workspace, it would be possible to live here quite comfortably and never drive anywhere.

At 1,512 square feet per unit, including a downstairs office and upstairs living quarters, the lofts themselves are minimalist. Because the units are designed for maximum practicality as well as beauty, it’s easy to see how a small space can meet one’s needs. Each unit sports large windows allowing maximum sunlight in the winter and minimal direct sunlight in the summer, a plethora of built-in cupboards, cabinets and closets, and enough shelves to make this book junkie salivate with envy.

The wood used in the complex is certified by the Forest Stewardship Council, the steel framing comes from 80 percent recycled product, the paints are all clay-based and VOC-free, and the units contain dual-flush toilets. Everything, from the countertops made from paper stone (recycled paper) to the insulation made from recycled blue jeans and underwear, is as environmentally sane as possible.

There is a large research component to doing this type of work. Because green building is a relatively new field and new products are cropping up all the time, it can be difficult to find the best material for the job. There is little long-term evidence to rely on, and so Sheldon and his team have gone through the laborious process of tracking products from their inception to their place on the product line.

The entire site is permeable, including the paved parking lot. Water runoff flows into a bio-retention site, where it is cleaned of oils and residues by the resident plant life before being let out into the local waterways. All of the water coming from the laundry, bathing and hand sinks travels through a graywater system, which is then used in the subsurface irrigation to water the property’s landscaping. The extensive graywater reuse serves as a perfect example of what this project means on a grander scale. To live here, tenants must buy into the idea that building and living in an environmentally conscious manner is essential to our survival. This means no dumping paint thinner down the drain, as everyone’s plants will shrivel and die.

The electrical system, too, demands group consciousness. Photovoltaic panels cover the roofs, and a grid-tied system is in place allowing power to be moved from building to building, wherever it is most needed. The less electricity used, the lower the monthly owner’s dues. Rather than run AC systems during the summer months, water from the heating and cooling system sprays onto the roof at night where it cools before flowing back into the tank and providing lower temperatures for the buildings during the day.

As Sheldon walks me through the lofts, which start in the high $700,000s, I can easily envision myself living here. Of course, I would have to get rid of the children. Sheldon assures me I can have a dog so I won’t be too lonely. The office downstairs will be the perfect space for writing my bestseller, and the loft, though small, is ideally suited for entertaining. As I trudge back to my car, the permeable gravel crunching beneath my feet, I envision this life for myself: childless and independently wealthy with closet space and finally enough bookshelves. While hardly feasible for me, I imagine that there are people out there for whom this could be a reality. In which case, perhaps they would not mind asking me over for dinner.

 


Getting the Point

0

02.27.08


The first time he did it, David Van Arsdale was extremely wary. The site was an out-of-the-way corner of a Santa Rosa supermarket parking lot, next to cartons of wilted lettuce. Van Arsdale didn’t say much, just did his business and got out of there. Eventually, over the years, he started chatting with the other people there. But not that first time.

“You kind of had to expose what you were doing. It was difficult at first,” Van Arsdale recalls. He kept up a jittery watch in case law-enforcement types were lingering nearby.

What kept him coming back was the chance to swap his used syringes for new ones. No more rubbing a matchbook flint across the point of a well-used syringe, trying to get it sharp enough for another injection. No more using the same needle 50 or more times to inject cocaine. “When you’re using a dull point, you know, you get a lot more pain,” he explains matter-of-factly.

Before needle exchanges were legalized in 2000, volunteers throughout California operated them clandestinely. Sonoma and Marin counties now both have active needle exchanges, and both participate in the statewide Disease Prevention Demonstration Project enacted in 2004 that lets addicts buy 10 syringes at a time from select pharmacies, no questions asked. If used syringes are properly housed, they are not considered as illegal drug paraphernalia. Napa County officials are studying the on-the-street exchange programs and the statewide pharmacy project, looking at what might work best there. In a bid to slow the spread of HIV and hepatitis C, both Marin and Sonoma counties are working to expand their exchange programs to reach ever more addicts.

Planting Seeds for Recovery

On a Friday night in January, a volunteer who asks to be known only as Pinky set up folding tables, bringing out boxes of syringes, piling up lunch-sized brown paper bags, and arranging cottons swabs, alcohol wipes, bio-disposal buckets and other items in an informal display in the lobby of a Santa Rosa office building. The tables also held abscess kits for cleaning infected injection wounds, and a notebook-sized book called Getting It Right: A Safety Manual for Injection Drug Users.

There were small containers of sterilized water for safely diluting drugs. A pot of soup simmered in a hot pot on one table. On another, Pinky arranged condoms, hotel-sized soaps, deodorants and a wide variety of wallet- and pocket-sized pamphlets on AIDS, safe sex and other health alerts for places that provide help for a wide range of problems or life situations. In a conference room nearby, a health professional was on hand to do AIDS testing if needed. Under one table was a box of clean clothes, available to anyone who needed them.

Almost every Friday for the past 10 years, Pinky has set up a needle exchange. “It’s something that needs to be done,” she says of her long-term commitment as a volunteer. “These people, most of the time they don’t get treated with the courtesy they deserve. We’re just trying to keep them safe, as far as getting sick and getting diseases.”

Pinky estimates that, in slightly less than three hours on an average Friday evening, about 45 to 50 people will drop by to replace their used syringes with new ones. Some come after they get off work, others before they start the night shift. About 10 or so arrive by bicycle, but most drive. “A lot of them have nice cars. They’re working and just trying to get by. Some are homeless, but I think the majority are working-class,” she says.

Sonoma County’s needle exchanges are run by the Sonoma County Hepatitis AIDS Risk Reduction Project (known as SHARP) under the organizational umbrella of the nonprofit Drug Abuse Alternatives Center (DAAC).

Over a year’s time in Sonoma County alone, SHARP estimates that some 100,000 to 150,000 needles are exchanged by roughly 250 to 350 different people. Last year, about 60 of those addicts got into some form of treatment for substance abuse.

“That doesn’t mean that person didn’t use after that time or not. We don’t know,” explains Lynn Campanario, who oversees SHARP’s exchange. The primary goal, Campanario says, is a clean needle every time an addict shoots up. Reusing a syringe can create a barbed point at the needle’s tip that can cause an abscess prone to infection. Sharing a needle means risking AIDS or hepatitis C. Addicts who need medical care rarely have health insurance; if they get ill, the community ends up paying for their care.

Another goal of the exchange, Campanario says, is to “plant seeds” so that eventually an addict might start thinking about getting out of a dangerous living situation, might leave a destructive relationship, might at least toy with the idea of rehab.

Talk Therapy

Over the years, the number of needle exchange sites in Sonoma County has waxed and waned depending on funding. Both SHARP and DAAC coordinate their efforts with Sonoma County’s Department of Health Services, which also provides some financial support. The rest comes from grants and donations.

Last September, the agencies won a five-year, $75,000-a-year state contract to expand the services offered through the needle exchange. They’ve subsequently added mobile exchanges in Guerneville and Monte Rio. During the first two months in Monte Rio, they took in more than 5,000 used syringes. That’s 5,000 needles that won’t turn up on local sidewalks, parks, garbage cans or vacant lots.

The plan is to continue to expand the program by adding sites in Petaluma and western and northern Sonoma County. The $75,000 annual state grant will also be used to set up a training program for overdose prevention and for those known as “primary exchangers,” people who turn in used needles and get new ones both for themselves and for their friends. Under the grant, primary exchanges will be offered incentives to act as peer counselors, passing on information to addicts who might otherwise have no contact with public health representatives or other officials.

A “ladies night” has already been added by SHARP on Thursdays in Santa Rosa, in partnership with Women’s Health Specialists. For two hours each week, female addicts can drop by, exchange needles and hang out in a safe space.

“We talk with them about whatever they’re wanting to talk about,” Campanario says. “It’s a very relaxed environment.”

They’ve already offered a night of free manicures, and volunteers will provide massages one evening. Such treats are not just for relaxation. The manicure night included information on hepatitis C risk from sharing nail clippers or a toothbrush.

It can be extremely difficult to find a site to hold a needle exchange. Not every suburban enclave welcomes one in the neighborhood. Therefore, the exchanges frequently end up outside in parking lots, which is less than ideal in the winter months.

One alternative is the pharmacy program, where addicts can buy syringes over the counter. It works for some people, but not every addict is willing to walk into a pharmacy and ask to buy syringes. Needle-exchange programs in the community are more discreet and they provide more than just fresh syringes. “One of the big things that we do is give resources on housing, food, shelter,” Campanario says. “We’re not just talking to them about how to deal with their drug-use stuff, because people don’t use in a tunnel. They have a whole life going on.”

It’s vital that volunteers and staff never try to persuade anyone to do anything, Campanario says. She points out that people who feel pressured or judged are unlikely to be return clients. A slow approach usually works best.

“When you’re talking to folks who come in to needle exchange, the hardest next step is to talk to them about their sex partners. So if we’ve built a good rapport, then that’s what opens up that door. I couldn’t do that the first time I talked with them.”

Blasting Social Stigma

The first woman points to the smallest possible size and says she wants that one, but her friend gently dissuades her. The first woman looks middle-class, dressed casually in a running suit, while her friend is clad in a stylish leather coat and would easily look at home in a Nordstrom’s or Neiman Marcus.

They could be discussing shoes or blue jeans, but they’re actually eyeing various sized syringes displayed in a former delivery van in a deserted parking lot in Marin County.

“The small ones jam easily,” the friend explains.

“Oh,” the first woman says, deciding that she wants a slightly larger syringe. She exchanges 80; her friend swaps 110, for herself and for friends who aren’t willing to come to the exchange van.

“The needle exchange is all about blasting through the social stigma,” explains volunteer Julie Muskat after the two women exit the van with their fresh syringes.

Muskat started volunteering as part of an ethics class, and stayed on after she satisfied her community-service requirement. “The work here is so helpful to the community, and if I have the time, why not help out?”

Muskat’s biggest eye-opener was the range of people who exchange needles in wealthy Marin. “You really don’t know what to expect,” she explains. “You quickly realize you can’t tell an intravenous drug user from anyone else. All kinds of people come here.”

The exchange is run by the Marin AIDS Project under the direction of point coordinator John Fenech. He worked in Sonoma County’s program for several years, and about three years ago took the job running Marin’s Project Point. In fiscal year 2006&–’07, they exchanged close to 80,000 syringes in 662 separate transactions.

“People come to needle exchanges in Escalades, in $50,000 Mercedes. You wonder, ‘Is this person parking in the wrong parking lot?'” Fenech laughs.

Although Marin County has more than a dozen pharmacies participating in the statewide exchange program and Sonoma County has two, Fenech says a lot of local addicts don’t want to get their syringes from a public store. “They can go to an exchange site and know they’re less likely to see their neighbors,” he explains.

One of the problems is that the average person has a jaundiced view of needle exchanges, believing that they perpetuate the use of drugs.

“I’ve been in recovery for 20 years, and I’ve never heard an addict say they got clean because they couldn’t find a clean syringe,” he says, laughing again.

“An addict will use any needle that they can find if they can’t get a clean needle,” Fenech asserts. “I’ve heard stories in recovery about people who’ve been with someone where the other person OD’d. Here’s a syringe hanging out of [an] arm, and the guy looks at it and says, ‘That must be really good stuff,’ and takes the syringe out of the dead person’s arm and injects himself with it.”

Needle exchanges, he adds, are about dealing with people as they really are, not as the community might want them to be, and reducing potential ways they might harm themselves.

“In reality, most people don’t get into recovery,” Fenech says. “So this keeps them safe, ‘healthy.’ A person could inject themselves for the rest of their lives and not get infected if they use needle exchange.”

He tells a story about his daughter, a hospital emergency room nurse. Sheriff’s deputies brought in a woman for a health check before taking her to jail on drug-related charges. The woman wore an oversized flannel shirt that she kept pulled down over one hand. “My daughter talked to her for quite a while about how important it was to let them see her arm,” Fenech recalls. “Finally the woman showed her arm. It was dead from her elbow down.”

An injection site had abscessed and gotten infected. Some of the bone was eaten away. Most addicts, Fenech adds, won’t seek treatment for an abscess because they don’t want anyone to see the needle tracks or know that they shoot up drugs.

On a lighter note, Fenech says there’s always a handy excuse. “I’ve never met so many people with infected spider bites in my life. Spider bites. That’s what they say.”

But They’re Just Junkies

Why are all of these volunteer hours, thousands of dollars and professional exertions being made to care for junkies? Who cares? Timothy Maroni, the syringe-exchange-program specialist for the Oakland office of the Harm Reduction Coalition (HRC), a national advocacy group, says that needle-exchange programs have a positive impact.

“There have been studies that have been inconclusive on different aspects, but overwhelmingly when they do a study, the evidence is clear that syringe-exchange programs save lives, save dollars, prevent infections, prevent destruction of families, keep syringes off the streets, are an excellent treatment entry point—all of those things.”

Based on studies, it’s estimated that only 15 percent of intravenous drug users are currently in treatment, and that syringe exchange has a two- to six-fold protective effect against HIV risk behaviors. Research also shows most people relapse several times before finally quitting. The goal of a harm-reduction approach is to keep them safe until they can get clean.

Maroni works with 39 needle-exchange programs statewide. He says such programs are one of the few places where addicts can be honest about who they are and what they do.

“Being in the closet is problematic and makes it hard to make behavior changes, to really look at yourself. And it’s hard to dialogue because you can’t speak,” Maroni says. “When people access services, they want to bring all of themselves, not just a part. They feel they have to lie in order to get services; they have to say they’re working on abstinence.”

Most injection drug users are socially isolated, and have small or nonexistent social-support networks.

“Every human being does have value,” Maroni stresses. “Everyone is worth saving. At [HRC], we’re all about being nonjudgmental, but that’s the one judgment we do have: that all human beings are complete, whole, worthy and valuable.”

From the Bottom Back Up

After his initial visit to that supermarket parking lot, David Van Arsdale continued using the needle exchange. Gradually he began to relax. “They treated me with respect. Nobody was there to corner you or to try to steer you towards recovery. They just took care of business.”

He started injecting cocaine back in his native Iowa, where it was legal to buy needles across a pharmacy counter, no questions asked. He relocated to California with a goal of getting away from the drug scene, but wound up in a motel his first day here, shooting up. And he quickly learned that clean syringes were a lot harder to get in California.

So he used and reused his needles. He knew friends who fashioned home-made versions out of little eyedroppers. “The value of a hypodermic needle was like gold,” he recalls. “You’d take the plunger out and use earwax to get it to slide back and forth. I used a syringe so often you couldn’t even read the numbers on it.”

Then another addict told him about Sonoma County’s needle-exchange program. For the next 15 years, he was a regular. The exchange had to move a couple of times, and he followed it wherever it went. He’d roll up on his bicycle, wearing headphones and be-bopping to the music. That became his connection with Fenech, who was then working in Sonoma County.

“We started talking about music. We kind of became friends,” Van Arsdale recalls. “When I came to exchange my needles, he never applied any pressure to get me into treatment. He always had time to come and sit with me. Sometimes they’d be serving food and I’d get a bowl of soup, and he’d sit down and talk.”

Van Arsdale was in and out of county jail on a variety of charges. A little over six years ago, he was arrested again, and this time there was talk of state prison. “I had kind of worn out my welcome on the county level,” he explains wryly.

At that point, Van Arsdale was 46 years old and out of options. He contacted the last friend who would accept calls from jail and had her get word to Fenech, asking him to visit.

Fenech came on a Saturday afternoon. “I told him, ‘Man, I need to do something about this problem,'” Van Arsdale recalls. By Monday morning, a representative of a local program was meeting with Van Arsdale in jail. He was admitted to the Turning Point rehab facility.

It was the threat of prison that steered Van Arsdale toward rehab, but it was his friendship with Fenech, nurtured through the needle exchange, that helped him find his way. [Marker]

Last December Van Arsdale celebrated six years clean and sober. He now works for DAAC as a counselor in the Sonoma County Drug Court program. He truly understands how hard it can be to kick a drug habit.

His advice? “If you’re out there using, utilize the needle exchange. It saves money, not to mention lives.”

Exchange Centers

In Sonoma County SHARP keeps its exchange sites confidential. To find out where they’re held, call the recording at 707.527.5277. For more information, including names of syringe-exchange pharmacies, or to volunteer or donate, call 707.544.3295, ext. 342. The SHARP office is located at 2403 Professional Drive, Santa Rosa.

In Marin County The Project Point van visits Mill Valley on Monday from 6pm to 8pm in the Park & Ride lot at the Stinson Beach exit off Highway 101. On Thursday, it’s in Novato from 6:30pm to 8:30pm on Rowland Boulevard, 0.1 mile west of Highway 101.

Exchanges are also held Tuesday from 5:30pm to 8pm at the Marin AIDS Project office, 910 Irwin St., San Rafael. Exchangers can also come by the office Monday to Friday from noon to 4pm on a drop-in basis. For more information or lists of syringe-exchange pharmacies in Marin, call 415.457.2487 or visit www.marinaidsproject.org.


Going for the Gamble

0

02.27.08

My point of view about Shakespeare,” says Bill Rauch, “is that—and maybe I’m a crazy person for saying this— I just want the artists who are interpreting the play to show me that there is risk being taken. I love risk. I don’t want safe, comfortable, recognizable Shakespeare, at least not all the time. And that’s pretty much how I feel about the art of theater in general.”

For the record, Bill Rauch is not a crazy person (not yet, anyway), but as a longtime stage director at some of the best and boldest stage companies in the country, he has proven that he is a risk-taker, one who enjoys working with other risk-takers as well. As the new artistic director of the 73-year-old Oregon Shakespeare Festival in Ashland, Rauch has already taken significant risks in the 12 months leading up to this opening month of his first full season in the captain’s seat, which he takes over from the equally iconoclastic but increasingly predictable Libby Appel, who has retired after 11 years as artistic director.

Since winning the appointment last year, Rauch has made significant changes in the festival’s personnel, bringing on new faces while saying goodbye to a number of longtime staffers. He’s taken a new direction in terms of the overall artistic environment, onstage and off, restructuring the organization of the company and how decisions are made. Most importantly, of course, Rauch has pushed the envelope in programming the current season of 11 plays, four of which opened in late February, with the rest opening gradually over the next several months.

This year will see a number of new things on the three festival stages, including a grand new staging of Thornton Wilder’s Our Town, marking the first time an American classic will be performed on the outdoor Elizabethan stage. There are a number of new plays, including Welcome Home, Jenny Sutter, a world premiere by Julie Marie Myatt, an imaginative drama about a returning Iraq soldier that will move, OSF cast intact, to New York’s Kennedy Center later this year.

Also new is the comedic Further Adventures of Hedda Gabler by Jeff Whitty (he wrote the Tony-winning Avenue Q), a play that Rauch directed an earlier draft of two years ago at Southern California’s South Coast Repertory theater, and which he’ll be directing again this year. Though it happens to be the oldest, perhaps the freshest thing onstage this year is the Sanskrit epic The Clay Cart, which marks OSF’s first presentation of a classic from the non-Western world. Directed by Rauch, it’s the play that launches the new season.

As for works by Mr. Shakespeare, Rauch has programmed a balance of rarely performed plays and beloved crowd pleasers (we said he wasn’t crazy), including the just-opened Midsummer Night’s Dream (with A Comedy of Errors and Othello in the summer), and the bloody and brooding Coriolanus (which opens next month).

About this new season, Rauch says, “One of the things I’m most excited about is that we do a combination of classics and new work, and so to be able to invite so many of the writers that I’ve worked with over the years to create work for Ashland or to do existing plays of theirs here is very exciting to me.”

Coriolanus is a play that is rarely performed, partly because of the intensity of its themes: war, political duplicity, inanity in leadership. “Coriolanus is one of my favorites,” Rauch says. “It’s such a constantly relevant play, especially right now. It feels very important. I’m really interested, every time we approach a Shakespeare play, in treating them like a brand-new play, a world premiere. I think that’s essential. I want to hire artists to interpret these plays who feel the same way.

“I do have a commitment to doing the whole Shakespearean canon,” Rauch adds. “Given that Shakespeare is our middle name and given that we do an average of four Shakespeare plays a year, I think that one of the things that’s exciting is that we can tackle not only the plays that are crowd pleasers—the plays that people love to see over and over again—but also to tackle the more difficult texts. That’s really important to me.”

Does this mean that productions of Shakepeare’s long-absent Cymbeline, Timon of Athens and Henry VIII are not out of the question for the near future?

“Why not?” Rauch says. “I believe that, on one level, we all want to be comforted by what’s familiar. But I’ve also realized that, ultimately, people come to OSF for more than comfort.

“Beginning this year, I plan to start offering a lot of surprises.”

For information on the 2008 Oregon Shakespeare Festival, go to [ http://www.osfashland.org ]www.osfashland.org.

The Local Angle

OSF draws a large North Bay contingent

Over the years, a hefty number of North Bay performers have emigrated north to strut their actorly stuff on the multiple stages of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival in Ashland. But not everyone is interested in being onstage, and there have been just as many, if not more, who’ve joined the ranks of the OSF as part of the vast backstage crew and support staff.

“There are a lot of us up here,” agrees set builder Elib Crist-Dwyer, formerly of Healdsburg, now a full-time scenic carpenter with the OSF. His first taste of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival came courtesy of a Healdsburg High School field trip, during which Crist-Dwyer dreamed of someday being the guy who raises the flag before every outdoor performance. A dozen years later—following a long stint building exhibits and creating educational theater programs for major museums—he has joined OSF’s mighty team of scenic carpenters.

He’s worked on sets for the current season since September, helping to construct an enormous green foot for The Clay Cart, set in India; an urban “forest” for A Midsummer Night’s Dream; and the detailed, multilayered backyard set of August Wilson’s Fences. Recently, he’s been building stair units for April’s upcoming production of Shakespeare’s sweeping Coriolanus.

While happy to be a behind-the-scenes player in an organization as massive and far-reaching as OSF, Crist-Dwyer hopes to someday ease into the company’s expansive education operation.

“That’s my real passion, and it’s one I share with the OSF—using theater as a way to teach people about the world,” he says.

Former Occidental resident Patrick Devon graduated from Analy High School and participated for several years in SRJC’s annual Summer Repertory Theater program, where he honed his craft in the ’80s as a dresser. It’s a skill he has since practiced with companies from San Francisco to England, where he worked in the wardrobe department of the renowned Royal Shakespeare Company. He’s been with OSF for three years.

“Basically, I dress naked people,” he says. “Also, a lot of being a dresser here is about protecting the actors from all the forces that might want to distract them from the performance at hand, people sending notes backstage and that kind of thing. We’re part costumer and part gatekeeper.” This year, Devon is working The Clay Cart and A Midsummer Night’s Dream, each of which has several rapid costume changes. “Everything is choreographed,” Devon says, “down to who moves left when someone moves right. Sometimes we only have 70 seconds to completely change a costume. It takes a lot of practice to get it right.”

An aspiring playwright, Devon was drawn to the OSF in part because of the company’s legendary support of its members’ extracurricular activities. In Devon’s case, he’s been able to stage his plays at special midnight showings, using first-rate actors from OSF’s stable of performers, drawing audiences from within the company and the surrounding community. His best-received play, Peaseblossom, is a comic romp telling the story of A Midsummer Night’s Dream from the point of view of the fairies “Getting to do my plays here is huge,” he says. “I’m fortunate to work with a company that supports its people so well.”

That’s how June Cummings feels.

After 20 years living in San Anselmo, Cummings and her husband moved up to Ashland three years ago, and she now works as an IT hardware technician, keeping all of OSF’s 280 computers and printers running, while also running cables for the various show’s sets and computerized equipment. “I’ve crawled through every inch of every theater and office in this place, from the basements to the ceilings,” she laughs. “I’m literally all over the place.”

Her favorite perk is being able to bring her dogs to work, where OSF has built an indoor dog run so the puppies stay happy.

“It’s wonderful here,” Cummings says. “And my job is great because it’s all about fixing things that need to be fixed. I’m not an actor, but this gives me my little bit of fame, because everyone appreciates the hardware technician. It’s really fun to always be the hero.”


Museums and gallery notes.

Reviews of new book releases.

Reviews and previews of new plays, operas and symphony performances.

Reviews and previews of new dance performances and events.

The Show Won’t Go On

0

02.27.08

Under the big top, trapeze artists soar through the air, tightrope walkers defy gravity and motorcyclists speed upside down inside the steel-cage Globe of Death. Spotlights, wires and posts, strung together for children of all ages fueled on a two-hour diet of cracked peanuts and cotton candy, fill the enormous tent while clowns and gymnasts wow the crowd. And under the big top, workers assemble and reassemble the entire circus from scratch every few days, bringing the show to a new town.

But this year, the only thing under the big top is a patch of weeds. The once-towering Circus Chimera tent sits lumped in a bundle in James Judkins’ backyard, a lonesome reminder of the stalled legislation needed to get the circus back on the road. The 2008 season for Circus Chimera, Judkins hates to say, has been cancelled.

Along with carnival companies that provide midways to county and state fairs across America, every traveling circus in the country dependent on foreign performers has been disabled by political grandstanding during a hot-button immigration era. Yet none of their performers or laborers are actually immigrating. This is sad news for North Bay circus lovers among the hundreds of towns where Circus Chimera has set up tent and distributed popular two-for-one admission coupons each year. A traveling circus with no animals, Circus Chimera’s elaborate productions consistently combine old-fashioned show business spirit with high-kicking world-class talent.

Like many other circuses and carnivals across the country, Circus Chimera is composed of seasonal performers and workers from around the world, and Judkins says that he has always made sure that everyone in the show comes to the United States with legal work visas. Unfortunately, a key provision for returning workers expired last year, and not one of his regular employees was able to acquire the usual temporary visa to work this year’s circus. As in years past, the provision came up for extension, but Congress, facing a full table right before the Christmas break, failed to act, allowing the provision—and the circus—to fade away.

“The people in the show are my family,” Judkins said last week, speaking from his home in Texas. “It’s put me in a serious depression for quite a while. I’m working on other things, trying to get reorganized for the future, but it’s hurt a lot.”

A staffer at Helm & Sons, the organization that supplies the carnival midway for the Sonoma County Fair each summer exclaimed bluntly, “It’s killing us!” before promising a return interview call that did not arrive, despite repeated prompts, by press time.

For his part, Judkins is currently focused on meeting with lawmakers and getting legislation underway, but it’s apparent that the big top is in his blood; he’ll scramble in any way possible to keep the show on the road. He’s considered scaling back his circus, perhaps buying a smaller tent, maybe visiting fewer towns. It’s not that the crowds aren’t there, he says; it’s that the nature of circus work simply isn’t attractive anymore to an American workforce.

“I ask people,” he says, “if they’d want to travel on the road for eight or nine months out of the year, moving to a different town three times a week.” So far he’s found no takers. Judkins himself joined the circus 33 years ago for a summer job in college, but notes that times have changed. “Now, college students, they do internships, they take summer classes, everybody’s so busy. Nobody has the time or the energy to do something like this.”

Since its inception in 1990, the H2-B visa program has allowed for a maximum of 66,000 temporary work visas to be granted each year to seasonal workers from other countries. Over the years, this cap has never risen proportionately with a growing economy. Demand for the temporary visas increased annually until 2003 when the cap was reached for the first time, putting many American businesses in peril.

Lawmakers swiftly scrambled to provide a way for seasonal workers to continue to return legally.

Three years ago, Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., and Rep. Wayne T. Gilchrest, R-Md., introduced the H2-B return worker exemption, a provision stating that temporary workers who had previously worked legally in the United States—paying taxes, abiding all laws and returning home—would be exempt from the national cap of just 66,000 visas. Renewed in 2006, the bipartisan provision was widely utilized until September of last year, when it expired and left many businesses strapped for employment.

What happened last year is that instead of another simple renewal, the return worker exemption got swallowed by the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act. When that failed, the return worker exemption was then attached to a Senate appropriations bill, but it was stripped in a conference committee at the behest of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, strange as that may seem. Naturally, the CHC wants the ever-popular return worker exemption renewed—but only if it’s attached to legislation sweetening the pot of its larger goals for immigration.

“Basically they’re holding us, and everybody else, hostage for Comprehensive Immigration Reform,” Judkins says, “for the ‘greater good,’ as they say. Which, to me, makes absolutely no sense. Businesses are closing down and letting American workers go, at the same time Congress is debating an economic stimulus package! It just doesn’t make any sense at all.”

Meanwhile, approximately 50,000 workers who’ve previously taken advantage of the return worker exemption are out of work. Circuses and carnivals in particular face a crucial timing issue in that applications for the remaining visas cannot be filed until 120 days before the work starts. For the circus season, this means Oct. 1—and by that time, all of the visas will have been snatched up. (Having a circus in December is highly impractical, Judkins says, due to weather and attendance issues.)

Circus Chimera’s seasonal employees, many of whom have been with the circus for nearly a decade, have since struggled to re-enter a tight labor market in Mexico. With an unemployment rate near 50 percent and the pay topping out at $100 a week, it’s a far cry from the $600-$700 per week plus meals and lodging that the circus provided.

“They’re just sort of bewildered, too,” Judkins says, “You tell ’em, ‘Let’s do it the right way. Don’t come across illegally. Do it right, we’ll get your visas.’ And all of a sudden, this year, they can’t grasp why, when they’ve done everything right, they can’t come back.” Judkins says that some of his best circus workers, with whom he stays in constant contact, are picking oranges or working at a bank for $80 a week. One of his men has even taken to selling fish door-to-door.

Judkins has traveled to Washington, D.C., four times to meet with lawmakers, and they all say the same thing: they’d vote to extend the return worker exemption in a heartbeat. After all, it’s not just the circus and carnival industries that are hurting; the restaurant, landscaping, agricultural and hospitality industries have relied overwhelmingly on the return worker exemption as well. “We couldn’t find any congressman or any senator,” Judkins reports, “who said it was a bad program, that they wouldn’t vote for it.”

But political bickering surrounding the hot button immigration issue has stalled the process. Nancy Pelosi, honoring the Congressional Hispanic Caucus’ wishes, wants the return worker exemption folded into yet another bid for Comprehensive Immigration Reform. (Pelosi’s office did not return repeated calls for comment on this story.) When that will finally pass is anyone’s guess, and meanwhile Judkins’ tent sits rumpled and unused, denied its reason for existence: keeping a great American entertainment tradition alive.

More than anything, Judkins wants to see Circus Chimera and others like it back on the road. “I just love it,” he says. “I like to travel, I like to see the crowds. You get a great deal of joy out of it. When people come out to see the show and you hear ’em clapping and stomping their feet and having a good time, you feel like you’re doing a good thing.”


Cream of the Crap

0

02.27.08

T he full-bodied tone, the rattle of the large reed, the layout of the keys—these and so many other key ingredients in John Coltrane’s forcefully expressive quality were inextricably tied to the tenor saxophone. So why, then, would anyone try to adapt Coltrane’s music to a different format—especially one as staid as a string quartet?

For Coltrane fans, it’s pretty funny to hear the Turtle Island String Quartet’s A Love Supreme: The Legacy of John Coltrane, in the same way it was maybe funny to hear Strung Out on OK Computer: The String Quartet Tribute to Radiohead seven years ago, and in the same way that it’s not funny at all to pore through the outright mercenary and novelty glut of string-quartet tributes recorded since then. The guilt-by-association factor alone should steer anyone away: when even low-rung losers like Hawthorne Heights, Jessica Simpson and Barry Manilow have their own string quartet tributes, throwing Coltrane in the mix is not just bad timing, it’s contextually insulting.

Don’t tell that to the members of the Turtle Island String Quartet, who undeniably, sincerely adore Coltrane’s music. They love it so much that they’ve wrested the great accomplishment of transcribing his searing solos and replicating them on the violin. But don’t they know that flat-out imitation goes against everything Coltrane’s musical approach stood for?

The disc gets off to a nice start by highlighting the complex chord structure of Blue Train’s “Moments Notice” in a lively arrangement, but it goes downhill from there. “La Danse du Bonheur,” a wanky John McLaughlin thing from 1976 in no way affiliated with Coltrane’s career, leads next into “Model Trane,” the Turtle Island String Quartet’s own homage to Coltrane, which is really just a tissue-thin rip-off of Coltrane’s own “Impressions.”

Where are the Coltrane compositions on this disc? Not in the played-to-death “My Favorite Things” or the Stanley Clarke tribute “Song to John.” Not in Thelonious Monk’s “Round Midnight,” which, sure, Coltrane once played, but so has everyone else in the world. The centerpiece is Coltrane’s “A Love Supreme” itself, but hearing the Turtle Island String Quartet’s attempt at it is like watching someone play Hamlet with a fake Danish accent: it’s excruciating specifically because of the sincerity of intent.

Nevertheless, A Love Supreme: The Legacy of John Coltrane has risen to the cream of the crap of string quartet tributes. Before her death, Alice Coltrane lauded this project, and it won a Grammy Award last month for Best Classical Crossover Album. Find out what the fuss is all about when the Turtle Island String Quartet perform Friday, Feb. 29, at the Napa Valley Opera House, 1030 Main St., Napa. 8pm. $35. 707.226.7372.


The Tudors

02.27.08

There’s a satisfying actor’s duel in The Other Boleyn Girl between Scarlett Johansson as Mary and Natalie Portman as Anne of the Thousand Days. Corsets grievously squash Johansson’s curves, and her golden hair is besnooded, or covered with those little birdhouse roofs the fine English ladies of the Tudor era chose to wear on their heads. Natalie Portman wins handily, making a fine Vulcan scowl in the latter half of the film, to indicate her embrace of power politics.

Eric Bana has more stomp in his step as Henry VIII than he had playing the Hulk; the castles seemed to shake under his footfalls. (That particular king is a choice part for any actor—even Homer Simpson was once seen courting the blue-haired “Margarine of Aragon.”) Bana’s Henry is young and desirable, with good muscles under his ermines. But he is a monster of fickleness, and not at all a subtle lover. Henry’s courtship of Mary Boleyn consists of a single word: “Tonight.”

Like a bull, he’s not to be interfered with during rut. That interference is the essence of Anne Boleyn’s mistake in this version of her story. Based on the popular novel by Philippa Gregory, The Other Boleyn Girl shows the problem with the principle “true love waits” (for marriage, that is). Certainly, the expression “Till death do we part” meant something different to Henry VIII than it did to most husbands.

The film shows the background of the climbing Boleyns, whose uncle was the sinister Duke of Norfolk, Thomas Howard (David Morrissey, bouncing back nicely from some unfortunate work in The Reaping and Fatal Attraction 2). Under his guidance, his niece Anne is raised as a dainty dish for the king. His majesty is married, though, to Catherine of Aragon, the Spanish queen who won’t come up with the requisite heir and a spare. Ana Torrent is a good Catherine, handsome but not haughty, correctly playing the queen as one of history’s unfortunates. Not quite so watchable is Kristin Scott Thomas as the mother of the Boleyn sisters and as full of predictions of doom to come as all the dowager queens in Shakespeare’s Lancastrian cycle wrapped into one.

Director Justin Chadwick has been a longtime British TV director (Bleak House, etc.). The budget shortfalls show, particularly in an off-screen hubbub to represent how the public feels about the king getting rid of their religion in order to divorce Catherine and marry Anne. The scenes have enough clarity, though, and the cast overcomes most if not all of the slow learner’s class lines that pop up. But Chadwick neglects the parvenu side of the Tudors. Henry’s fretting about an heir makes a little more sense if you’re reminded that decades of civil war had occurred over the line of succession, not long before this king’s own birth.

The camera work on The Other Boleyn Girl is the true drawback. Chadwick seems determined not to be Masterpiece Theater&–ish, even at the risk of visual illegibility. This is partially the fault of critics, who are always bemoaning Masterpiece Theater compositions in costume dramas. At least those simple compositions are clear. Trying to avoid a static, too formal world, Chadwick goes for an eclipsed lens, as if all the scheming was seen from behind a curtain or through leaded glass. The camera lurches from pillar to post, and it always seems to have its hair in its eyes.

‘The Other Boleyn Girl’ opens everywhere on Friday, Feb. 29.


New and upcoming film releases.

Browse all movie reviews.

Wine Tasting Room of the Week

0


T he past few years have seen much excitement about the 1976 “Judgment of Paris,” from a 30th-anniversary rematch to a film treatment of the celebrated competition in which French judges deemed several California wines better than the best of France. Lesser known is a 2007 competition in which Napa’s Rocca Vineyard’s 2002 Cabernet Sauvignon crushed the cream of California Cabs in France. Call it “the judgment of Bordeaux,” 12 ultra-fine (unlike damn-fine or even smokin’ hot, ultra-fine is an official category) Cabernets and Bordeaux-style blends were evaluated in a blind tasting by an orderly mob of 100 European enophiles. (The California Vintner’s Club named Rocca’s 2004 Cab “the best of the best” in a similar tasting.) What is particularly entertaining is that this upstart wine showed up area heavyweights with demand-driven prices; at $65, it’s a comparative value.

A native Santa Rosan, Dr. Mary Rocca took a circuitous route over the hill by way of the East Coast where she founded a dentistry practice and later a gourmet market in Pt. Reyes before purchasing vineyards. She releases vintages with the help of longtime consulting winemaker Celia Masyczek, making Rocca Vineyards one of few woman-owned and -run wineries.

The tasting salon occupies a large space in a historic stone building on Main Street, where visitors can be seated and enjoy the generous pours at leisure. What with the Oxbow Market and a gaggle of new tasting rooms in Napa, it’s now possible to spend an entire day in this town. I had to ask: How can a 2,000-case winery afford such real estate in a revitalized gourmet center? Rocca’s husband, Dr. Grigsby, shares the building for his practice in pain management. It would be entirely reckless to muse that they are therefore in a similar business—but Rocca does craft the kind of wine that softens the edges of life and brightens the rainy afternoons.

Dressed up in wrangler dude duds, the doctor makes an appearance on the label of Rocca’s 2005 Bad Boy Red ($29), a big and dry wine that opens with toasted graham cracker, with black fruit and baking chocolate on the palate. Rocca’s 2003 Syrah ($42) is inky to nose and eye, with aromas of fruitcake and charred oak, while the 2004 Syrah ($45) offers woodsy spice, riparian scents and hints of leather and Virginia tobacco—a Russian River Pinot on overdrive? A purple floral bouquet wafts from a 2004 Cabernet Sauvignon ($65), leading to leathery dark fruit and a sweet finish of blackberry. When I tasted this wine earlier with a friend who has been until recently a confirmed Cab hater, she was thoroughly won over by this wine’s warmth, silky texture and dark clove spice—for me, as good an endorsement as any by a panel of 100 experts.

Rocca Wine Tasting Salon, 1130 Main St., Napa. Open Monday–Saturday, 1pm to 6pm. $10 tasting fee. 707.257.8467.



View All

Cheese World

02.27.08

Why, we scratched, are we so blessed in the North Bay to have two fairly major cheese events slated for the same bleary first week of March? We fancied that it had something to do with the annual rhythm of the cheese maker’s year: new spring grasses, calving animals—the usual verdant agrarian fantasy. In fact, according to Sheana Davis, founder of the Sonoma Valley Cheese Conference , now in its sixth year, it has to do with winter’s drop in tourism and the opportunity that allows something new and different to help fill restaurants and hotel beds. OK, so not a verdant agrarian fantasy—but who really cares? This is cheese we’re talking about. And indeed, a full week of cheese instruction and eating is our good fortune, beginning with Davis’ Sonoma conference March 4&–6 and continuing with the second annual Artisan Cheese Festival in Petaluma March 7&–10.

Focused on providers, restaurateurs and on the business of cheese-mongering, the Sonoma Valley Cheese Conference is composed of three daylong seminars on the marketing, storage, preparation, purchasing and importance of community connections for those in the businesses of purveying or producing artisanal cheeses. Each day ends with a tasting reception featuring different wine and beer makers, as well as cheeses from around the world. “Sixteen years ago, when I first became a chef,” Davis says, “everyone [in the restaurant world] knew their beef producer, their poultry producer, their fruit and vegetable producers—but no one knew their cheese producers. I decided to go out and meet them.”

For its part, the Artisan Cheese Festival is aimed at the consumer. It features an opening reception and two days of educational tastings and seminars, a cheese marketplace and a gala dinner. Field trips to local creameries are also scheduled.

Next year, Davis promises that the two events will be a full month apart; as it stands, local cheese makers can’t attend the training she offers because they have to be selling at the Petaluma event. “A small business owner can’t be away for seven days,” she says.

Saturday, March 8, is the big day in Petaluma, focusing on the educational aspects of producing delicious cheeses made by local dairy and farming families, as well as how the consumer can help support and sustain the artisan communities who farm on protected agricultural lands.

“Our mission is to support the artisan cheese community,” says Lynne Devereux, the festival’s associate director. “We’re here to highlight what’s in our own backyard.”

To learn more about the Sonoma Valley Cheese Conference, go to www.sheanadavis.com; for details on the Artisan Cheese Festival, go to [ http://www.artisancheesefestival.com ]www.artisancheesefestival.com.

Quick dining snapshots by Bohemian staffers.

Winery news and reviews.

Food-related comings and goings, openings and closings, and other essays for those who love the kitchen and what it produces.

Recipes for food that you can actually make.

The Mercury Myth?

0

02.27.08

Mercury is a poison, but how toxic is it really when ingested in varying quantities through seafood? Voices in the scientific community offer conflicting answers. Many authorities assert that the metal has been associated with memory loss, fatigue, numbness in the extremities, blindness and depression. Others suggest that reported negative health effects blamed on mercury are false or imagined, and a developing theory even suggests that simultaneous consumption of selenium will protect the body and brain against any negative effects of the infamous heavy metal.

Dr. Philip Davidson of the University of Rochester has closely observed children in the Seychelles Islands since 1990 in a generational study of those reared on a fish-heavy diet. Davidson says that mercury contamination and mercury poisoning are very different things. He asserts that only two cases of severe mercury poisoning caused by fish consumption have ever occurred, each in Japan in the 1950s after local industries dumped huge amounts of highly contaminated refuse into the ocean.

“Generally, the levels of mercury found in fish are way, way below what are needed to poison a person,” he says. “In the Seychelles, we’ve found no consistent adverse effects in the children we’ve studied in a period of almost 20 years.”

Dr. Nicholas Ralston of the University of North Dakota’s Energy and Environmental Research Center (EERC) supports a theory that suggests that sufficient dietary selenium will counter potential threats of ingested mercury. Through experimentation on nonhuman subjects, Ralston has found that selenium molecules bind tightly to mercury within the body, rendering the toxic heavy metal inert and harmless. Ralston believes that the public has not caught on due to a general misconception about selenium.

“People aren’t excited about this because they often believe that selenium itself is a toxin,” he says. “It’s actually a required nutrient for neural development, and if this was better understood I think people would be more enthusiastic about its role in protecting against mercury.”

Selenium naturally occurs in high densities in such ocean fish as tuna, salmon, swordfish and many others. Selenium facilitates brain development, strengthens the immune system and detoxifies free radicals in the body. But actually barring mercury from imparting any damage to the body and brain is the most dramatic, if debated, attribute of this element. If real, this could reshape how we’ve been trained to think about such fish as tuna and swordfish, notorious for their high mercury levels.

In May 2006, Frontier GeoSciences Inc., an independent laboratory in Seattle, tested 142 samples of 18 species of fish. Ninety-seven percent of the individual samples contained far more selenium than mercury; even tuna and swordfish were found to carry as much as 25 times more selenium than mercury, a ratio exceedingly sufficient for safeguarding against mercury poisoning according to Dr. Ralston.

But not all experts trust his theory. Kimberly Warner, a marine-pollution scientist with the nonprofit environmental advocacy group Oceana, says that multiple published studies demonstrate negative effects on the human body due to mercury consumption. At the University of British Columbia, Warner says, professor of pediatrics Dr. Sheila Innis has reported an influx in various physical symptoms among Asian Canadians, a large fish-eating population, serious enough to send concerned parents to hospitals with their affected kids.

Warner also points toward a 2006 paper authored by M. Saldana published in the British Journal of Ophthalmology that details the case of an individual who nearly went blind while indulging regularly in mercury-laden Caribbean red snapper. Those on the other side of the argument can just as readily rattle off the names and affiliations of various studies which back their own claim that mercury is not the devil we have come to think it is. But Jackie Savitz, pollution campaign director for Oceana, is immediately skeptical of researchers who discount mercury as a danger to human health.

“When I hear people say that mercury is not as damaging as once thought, then I begin to wonder where their funding is coming from,” she says. “If you follow the money, you will find the tuna industry behind a lot of studies.”

For example, in October of 2005, serious questions arose about the validity of a study released by the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis. That particular paper stated that the benefits of eating fish far outweigh any risks presented by mercury. The fishy part? Harvard accepted approximately $500,000 in research funding from the National Fisheries Institute and the United States Tuna Foundation.

The University of North Dakota’s EERC also receives a portion of its selenium-mercury research funding from the tuna industry. Annual grants of $200,000 from the EPA keep Ralston’s project afloat, but the Tuna Foundation caught wind of the good news emanating from his laboratory after Ralston’s first year of research. The foundation promptly began donating, as did the U.S. Department of Energy, with each offering $100,000 over a three-year period.

“It doesn’t mean that anyone’s lying,” Savitz concedes. “It just raises a red flag, since he’s putting forth a serious question that is totally inconsistent with the consensus in the scientific community. It doesn’t mean he’s spinning the science, but it could suggest that the results are driven to some degree by the funding.”

Ralston defends the validity of his research. “Nobody’s allowed to have a say in our results and findings,” he says. “People who start making accusations about this kind of thing just don’t understand the basic respect that most scientists have toward scientific integrity.”

He also insists that the idea of mercury “poisoning” is far more conceptual than factual.

“Where all this fear has come from, it’s hard to say. Except in a few extreme cases, serious mercury poisoning has never even happened.”

Quick dining snapshots by Bohemian staffers.

Winery news and reviews.

Food-related comings and goings, openings and closings, and other essays for those who love the kitchen and what it produces.

Recipes for food that you can actually make.

Letters to the Editor

02.27.08Chickie-nobs®Although Joy Lanzendorfer's article "Replicant Repasts" (Feb. 20), didn't encourage the cloning of meat, it completely failed to mention perhaps the most detrimental effect of the FDA's approval of cloned meat in our nation's food supply. Yes, small farms would suffer; yes, there could be health risks. But the biggest problem will be with the nature of this decision's...

High Above It

02.27.08 B ecause buildings are responsible for a vast amount of our daily CO2 emissions and have a larger impact on the environment than any other single element, high-density building and energy efficiency are a driving force behind architect Steve Sheldon's vision of housing for a sustainable future. According to Sheldon, designer of the Florence Lofts, a new green complex...

Getting the Point

02.27.08The first time he did it, David Van Arsdale was extremely wary. The site was an out-of-the-way corner of a Santa Rosa supermarket parking lot, next to cartons of wilted lettuce. Van Arsdale didn't say much, just did his business and got out of there. Eventually, over the years, he started chatting with the other people there. But not...

Going for the Gamble

02.27.08My point of view about Shakespeare," says Bill Rauch, "is that—and maybe I'm a crazy person for saying this— I just want the artists who are interpreting the play to show me that there is risk being taken. I love risk. I don't want safe, comfortable, recognizable Shakespeare, at least not all the time. And that's pretty much how...

The Show Won’t Go On

02.27.08Under the big top, trapeze artists soar through the air, tightrope walkers defy gravity and motorcyclists speed upside down inside the steel-cage Globe of Death. Spotlights, wires and posts, strung together for children of all ages fueled on a two-hour diet of cracked peanuts and cotton candy, fill the enormous tent while clowns and gymnasts wow the crowd. And...

Cream of the Crap

02.27.08T he full-bodied tone, the rattle of the large reed, the layout of the keys—these and so many other key ingredients in John Coltrane's forcefully expressive quality were inextricably tied to the tenor saxophone. So why, then, would anyone try to adapt Coltrane's music to a different format—especially one as staid as a string quartet?For Coltrane fans, it's pretty...

The Tudors

02.27.08There's a satisfying actor's duel in The Other Boleyn Girl between Scarlett Johansson as Mary and Natalie Portman as Anne of the Thousand Days. Corsets grievously squash Johansson's curves, and her golden hair is besnooded, or covered with those little birdhouse roofs the fine English ladies of the Tudor era chose to wear on their heads. Natalie Portman wins...

Cheese World

02.27.08Why, we scratched, are we so blessed in the North Bay to have two fairly major cheese events slated for the same bleary first week of March? We fancied that it had something to do with the annual rhythm of the cheese maker's year: new spring grasses, calving animals—the usual verdant agrarian fantasy. In fact, according to Sheana Davis,...

The Mercury Myth?

02.27.08Mercury is a poison, but how toxic is it really when ingested in varying quantities through seafood? Voices in the scientific community offer conflicting answers. Many authorities assert that the metal has been associated with memory loss, fatigue, numbness in the extremities, blindness and depression. Others suggest that reported negative health effects blamed on mercury are false or imagined,...
11,084FansLike
4,606FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow