So Many Roads

0

On a Grateful Dead tour, you met the best people on Earth. People from all walks of life were drawn to Dead shows, the way Richard Dreyfuss was
drawn to Devils Tower in Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

But there were also narcs, feds, drug addicts, clinically insane misfits and jerks. There was a series of “religious” groups, like the Golden Roaders, selling backless dresses and Sufi spinning at shows. Then there were the Moonies, although I only saw them at shows in the Northeast, who were aggressive and deceptive, selling lame stickers and incense.

The Krishnas gave out free rice, but they also played their freaking tambourines and drums at sunrise to greet the day. Not a good group to camp next to. From Scientologists to evangelical Christians to mini-messiahs that paraded around in full regalia (mostly a robe, loincloth and a conch full of burning sage), there was no shortage of wackadoodles to join up with or be abducted by.

I know that I and hundreds (or at least dozens) of other Deadheads took it upon ourselves to be the ones to “look out” for the weaker ones as the scene grew exponentially and then collapsed upon itself. I am grateful for my time in that world, and recently I reflected on that journey—at least the parts I could remember.

09-06-80, Maine State Fairgrounds, Lewiston, Maine

I had, like, 20 or 30 Grateful Dead concerts under my belt, but this show in Lewiston, Maine, was my first outdoor show. Personally, my life was in a bit of a downward spiral. I was 18 years old. I had recently not graduated from high school. I failed gym—don’t ask. For good or ill, I still hadn’t found a steady girlfriend. Most of my buddies had left for college. I was reluctantly working at Swensen’s Ice Cream shop and dreading starting Kean University in Union, N.J. I only applied because my father thought I was mentally deficient. “Who fails gym?!” was the battle cry around the DNA household.

Entering Lewiston, it seemed as if the entire town was welcoming—or looking to cash in on—the invading horde. People were standing in their driveways offering $10 parking to anyone desperate enough for the promise of an indoor bathroom. Restaurants had “Welcome Deadhead” signs in their windows. The line of VWs, broken-down wrecks and school buses en route to the show was viewed as a parade. Children were waving. There was no undercurrent of judgment. It was a true community spectacle. Post-show articles cried about the wild atmosphere that the Dead circus brought to town, but they cried all the way to the bank.

I was used to people scampering to the stage and setting up perimeters, establishing little Trumpian invisible walls between their space and my space. This was different. This was my first outdoor show, and in the big field that had been in use since 1898, there was space enough for everyone. The Dead played for three hours, and it was a slice of heaven. An undeniable connection between fans, band and environment occurred. Gone was the cement underneath. I took my shoes off. This might seem, especially to my California friends, a simple enough move, but it was revelatory.

Unlike the Great Nothing in The Neverending Story, there was a great something afoot, and the music of the Grateful Dead was the conduit. And much like The Neverending Story, every person there felt like they were the central character in a cosmic tale. It was a grounding experience. The roles I played at home, mostly that of a lowly ice cream scooper with a GED, melted away. I felt lucky as hell to be there, and I knew I wanted more. Now, as many have argued before, it could have all been a dream brought on by hallucinogens and projected expectations. But the way I saw it, a dream was better than no dream at all—or, worse yet, suburbia.

10-11-83, Madison Square Garden, New York City, N.Y.

If I had to call one venue my home, it would be Madison Square Garden. I must have seen the Dead there 20 times. From my parents’ house, it was less than 40 minutes to get to the city and wind my way to Seventh and 33rd. In the world of concert experiences, MSG is a singular adventure. Opened in 1968, the roof was built with shock absorbers, so when the entire venue is rocking with 20,000 fans going apeshit, the roof literally bounces up and down.

I’ve been in a lot of coliseums, but MSG has that special feel of being a world-class stage where magic has occurred over and over again. The original space was five blocks away, opened in 1879, and featured people like Nikola Tesla. But from Ali vs. Frazier’s “Fight of the Century” to the Ringling Bros.’ home to the birth of Hulkamania, the “new” MSG has a thousand stories. It is every East Coaster’s mecca.

It should be remembered that, as reverential a space as MSG is, right outside the door is New York City, the city that never sleeps, the city with an incredibly organized police force that deals with crazies 24/7. So when the Dead came to town, they geared up. Yes, the cops could be helpful in their brusque, in-your-face NYC way. But every police squad needs to generate arrests, and Dead crowds were easy pickings.

On the street, 25 undercover cops were putting on their tie-dyes—that they had just confiscated—and walked around filling garbage bags with Deadheads’ crafts and shirts. Everyone knew it was risky to sell anything on the streets of New York, but Deadheads need gas money just to get to the next show, and often selling a few trinkets was the only way to do it.

The tour lot, dubbed Shakedown Street, was a bazaar of crafts, food, drumming and anything you could imagine. It was our Silk Road. It was the original dark web. Over the years, I sold shirts, drums, these purple face masks you blew in that created a hypnotic experience, grilled cheese sandwiches, anklets (these were my bread and butter), hand-painted sun dresses and baby food. Some friends made a killing with Steal Your Face metal license plates. It was pure copyright infringement, but the profits were enormous. Some Guatemalan dealers made a mint at shows.

For most of the Deadheads trying to hustle a few stickers, it was dire straits to not sell them, so the risk was worth it. Being stuck in NYC after a show could be grim. One summer, I paid for the entire journey with just a few balls of hemp string and a big bag of African trading beads. Ninety percent of what you saw people selling was handmade. It was Etsy in real time.

[page]

I was 21. I had turned my life around. My dad had a string of heart attacks, my grandparents died, and something in my head clicked. Even though, in my first semester, I got a 0.00 GPA at Kean University, I finally “got” that if I just repeated back to teachers what they said to me, I could get an A. I decided I was going to go to graduate school in California, to be closer to the band, and doing well as an undergrad was my meal ticket. I was working full-time, going to school full-time and helping my family out. I was also ingesting everything that came my way.

Rumors were circulating at this MSG show, as they would at almost every show: songs overheard in sound check, possible guest appearances and Jerry’s health. I disregarded all the pre-show talk. I could give a wharf rat’s ass about guest appearances. I wanted the core band; everyone else was a distraction.

I was feeling my oats at this show. The crowd was on stun, and I sat in my seat like all the others through the first set. I almost bailed and went to the hallways where the real action was, but I wanted to actually see whatever the band had up its sleeve. Top of the second set, I decided I was going to stand for the entire thing. I let the people behind me know. I told them, “Look, guys, there’s no fucking way I’m sitting down.” At least everyone around knew I was a dick. In NYC, this is known as “being courteous.”

The second set rolled through “China Cat,” “Rider,” “Miracle,” “Bertha,” and still nobody around me stayed on their feet. People would get up and then sit back in their metal folding chair. Then the band broke it down, slowed it to a halt and drifted into a haunting “China Doll” (the band’s most personal song about suicide and depression). It appeared perhaps I was wrong, that maybe the boys were wrapping it up—but I still had a feeling.

Then out of space came the first notes of “St. Stephen.” They hadn’t played it since 1979, and suddenly everyone was on their feet. When the lyrics “In and out of the garden he goes” were sung, the Garden exploded. Twenty thousand people were now screaming along: “Wherever he goes the people all complain.” New Yorkers, the butt of everyone else’s jokes, knew better than most what this meant. Now we were all standing on our chairs, and the magic of Madison Square Garden was in full effect.

It was a supersonic jolt. Everybody behind me was smiling. Whatever neurolinguistic programs were running got a hard reboot. Although there was another Dead show at MSG the following night, and then two more in Hartford, Conn. (where they played “St. Stephen” again, my second and last time hearing it), this show was the peak, the pinnacle that Maslow runs on about. Was it their best show? No. Not even close. But for a short amount of time, something occurred that turned a coliseum of strangers into a community.

8-31-85, Manor Downs Speedway, Manor, Texas

Driving into Texas, I was following a black Porsche that was doing a cool 85 miles an hour. Following me was a Texas trooper. Flashers on, he motioned for me to pull over and went after the now accelerating Porsche. I had been in Texas for five minutes, and I had no intention of being arrested. I slowed down, saw the cop disappear from view and kept going. I was young and fearless. I also had a lot of weed in the car. It was the beginning of a
13-show run.

The temperature in Texas in late August borders between Holy Hell and Kill-Me-Now Hell. Not only was it sweltering, but massive storms extended to the horizon. I always wanted to spot a twister, and sure enough in the distance a black funnel cloud was touching down.

I finally got to Austin, and fell in love with the town. Lotta Heads. Plenty of bars. Music playing in the streets. Imagine the TV show Deadwood, if everyone in the town was on mescaline.

Manor Downs was being run at this point by Sam Cutler, ex-manager of the Dead and the Rolling Stones. So it was going to be a full-blown freak fest. Manor Downs is on the edge of town. It was Saturday night. Every cowboy and cowgirl within a hundred miles was coming to see the shindig. Time to blow off steam, Texas-style.

Upon entering, I noticed a Greenpeace booth. This was a good sign. This was before every organization in America had a clipboard on the corner and pestered you for a signature. Back in 1985, Greenpeace had serious cred. Besides the Rainbow Warrior, this booth might have been the only place it was disseminating info.

I bee-lined for the front row. I was going to go toe-to-toe with Texas. Saturday night, oversold show, front row, Jerry side. The energy was off the hook. Everyone in the front row realized early on that there was a 50-50 chance we would all be crushed to death. Keeping balance and helping anyone near you that dipped down was key, and went without being said.

The show started, and out came the Saturday-night party accoutrements. Booze, joints. But this was Texas, and, as you might have heard, everything is bigger in Texas. The joints were the size of a baby’s forearm, the Jack Daniels was in a gigantic, novelty-sized bottle—or maybe that’s just the way it comes in Texas. Everything was shared. We were the front-row army, locking arms and keeping the ship of fools behind us.

[page]

It’s common to label the Dead a psychedelic rock band, a ’60s relic and a jam band. Lesser known is that they were also a kick-ass country band. That night, pumping out Marty Robbins and Johnny Cash, the Texans crowed, caw-cawed and hooted, and the electricity was jumping around the crowd like a frog in a hailstorm.

The second set ended with 15,000 people clapping along to the Buddy Holly song “Not Fade Away” until the band left the stage, leaving drummer Mickey Hart conducting the 10-gallon crowd with just one drumstick. Then he left as well.

The show ended. Pleasantries were exchanged. Suddenly, I lost my bearings. Where was the Greenpeace booth, had they already packed up and left? My foot hit a piece of wood. Looking down amidst the mud was scattered debris. The Greenpeace booth had been shattered, decimated, and was already decomposing in the mud. It wasn’t ominous, it was Texas, and that’s just the way they do things.

Sitting on the hood of my car in the middle of the cornfield like something out of Hee Haw, young Texans began popping up between the stalks, adjusting overalls straps, pulling down shirts and blouses. The cornfields were full of people fucking! And at that moment I finally understood Texas. Nobody, and I mean nobody, parties like Texans on a Saturday night.

10-25-1985, Hollywood Sportatorium, Pembroke Pines, Florida

By September of 1985, I’d made it to California. I was living in San Francisco’s Mission District with my brother and his wife. That lasted about two weeks. It ended with him, naked, pinning his wife to the ceiling. I’m pretty sure it was real, but it also was a good stunt to get me to leave. A childhood friend was going to Dominican College in San Rafael, and before you could say “Aoxomoxoa,” I was living right between the Grateful Dead studio and office. So now I was hanging with my childhood buddy in Marin, painting apartments, chilling out with John Cipollina (our roommate’s brother was his manager) and decompressing by hiking Mount Tamalpais every single day. I don’t know about holy spots and vortexes, but
Mt. Tam is very special to me. I had no desire to go back to New Jersey, but life is funny that way.

This next part is hard for me to write about. Long story short, I made a phone call that interrupted a friend’s suicide attempt. I felt obligated to fly back to New Jersey. She was stuck in the mental ward for a week. While there, I met her estranged father, and he told me I could stay in his Florida condo for a few days if I needed to get away.

Well, the Dead were playing two shows in Florida, so I agreed. He might have never done anything for her, but I was going to take advantage of this opportunity. I’m sorry to say that Deadheads will capitalize on misfortune if it leads to seeing a show.

Florida was the Orange State, and I was coming with orange sunshine. If you removed all of the tourists, gangs, spring breakers, and old people from Florida, it would still be the weirdest state in the country. It’s the land that’s weird. It’s spongy. There’s a higher and higher percentage of water in the landmass that increases until you hit the Everglades. Alligators, pumas, panthers, poisonous snakes and bugs the size of your fist abound. Florida would be overrun with wildlife in a week, given the chance.

There were two shows in two days, about seven hours apart. The Sportatorium was a monstrosity. The acoustics were terrible, and it was evident somebody built this place as a cash cow rather than a sacred—or even comfortable—space. I didn’t care. My mind was full of thoughts, and I needed to unravel my helix with my favorite band in the world. That night the band spoke to me.

Now, did Deadheads really believe that the Dead, or specifically Jerry, was sometimes communicating with them? Short answer: yes. Short response from you: probably disbelief, possibly even scorn, like, “What, are you crazy?” I get that. Believe me, it has swirled around my head for decades. It seems that saying the band “communicated with us” and is too narrow a way to talk about it. There was a something. How each person interpreted it was up to him or her.

Was it at every show that this something happened? No, which is one reason Deadheads went to as many shows as possible: to increase the odds of catching it.

Once, at a show in Laguna Seca, I had the privilege of spending some time with a Navajo chief. He said his tribe is called Dineh. I kept thinking he was saying DNA. Eventually we figured it out and had a laugh. He told me that the Deadheads were part of the Navajo prophecies. He laid a story on me about how once the rainbow people gather, the buffalo will return.

Were you expecting something more nuanced? It’s prophecy, people, it’s supposed to be cryptic!

Another time I saw writer Joseph Campbell at the Palace of Fine Arts. It was a symposium called “From Ritual to Rapture: From Dionysus to the Grateful Dead.” It was Campbell’s belief that what he witnessed at some recent Dead shows in Oakland, where Campbell and I locked eyes for a while, was an ecstatic movement, a Dionysian catharsis, where, through dance, music and intoxicants, transformation was happening.

All right, I’m with you, this could all be bullshit. But I’m also a Deadhead who saw some wild stuff.

Santa Cruz-based DNA has been published internationally since 1989. He currently produces several comedy festivals and believes in community out of chaos.

Rigged

Last week, Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom was one of numerous elected officials from around the nation to tee off on U.S. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke for
his decision to exempt offshore drilling in the vacation state of Florida while failing to do the same for blue states such as California with big tourist economies of their own.

The move by Zinke highlighted a federal energy policy under President Donald Trump to open offshore drilling, but only if it doesn’t interfere with Trump’s ocean view from Mar-a-Lago.

Newsom zeroed-in his critique, via a few pointed tweets directed at Zinke, over the secretary’s rationale for giving Florida a pass from fulfilling the Trump administration’s offshore-drilling plans as detailed in a report released this month from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), which operates under the aegis of the Department of the Interior.

Newsom noted that Zinke cited the impact on the state’s tourism industry as the signal driver behind his decision to keep the drilling rigs from view of tourists. Zinke did not, however, extend the same courtesy to other states with a robust tourist economy: Oregon, New York, Virginia and, of course, California.

Newsom had the numbers on hand to make his point. Florida, he noted in a series of tweets directed at Zinke, had 113 million visitors in 2016, while California had 269 million statewide visitor trips. Tourists in Florida spent $109 billion; in California, they spent $126.3 billion.

“Using this logic,” tweeted Newsom, “CA’s coast should be declared free of offshore drilling as well. Or do blue states not get exemptions?”

So far, they do not, and Newsom was unavailable for further comment on the matter. The BOEM document, the 2019-2024 proposed draft for the National Outer Continental Oil Shelf and Gas Leasing Program (the OCS, for short), sets out a Trump-approved schedule for renewed offshore drilling from the North Atlantic around the bend of the Gulf of Mexico, and up to Northern California and the Pacific Northwest.

Under the OCS, the federal government will sell drilling leases in Northern California in 2021, and then again in 2023. The feds would offer new lease sales in Southern California in 2020 and 2022. Central California would also see new potential leases in 2021 and 2023.

The last offshore drilling leases in Northern California were sold in 1963, when seven exploratory wells were drilled and came up dry. That same year, a dozen exploratory wells were drilled in Central California and, similarly, no oil was found. Oil was discovered in Southern California, which is where all the current leases are.

The idea is that this time around, improvements in oil-exploration technology may yield something other than mud. The problem is those improvements are causing grave concern among opponents—a concern now met with outrage over the Zinke duplicity in Florida.

“Offshore drilling is inherently dangerous,” says Kristen Monsell, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. The Oakland-based Monsell notes that the practice “causes dangerous pollution, risks devastating oil spills that kill marine life and harm coastal communities, and exacerbates the climate crisis.”

The advent of offshore fracking, which would be allowed by the Trump administration’s plan, “only heightens those risks,” she says. That process involves blasting a high-pressure water-and-chemical stew into the ocean floor, which cracks rocks and exposes oil or gas fields.

“The high pressures used in offshore fracking increase the risk of well failure and oil spills.”

Then there’s the back end, says Monsell. Federal rules allow petrochemical companies to “dump their waste fluids, including fracking chemicals, into the ocean,” she says. “Scientists have identified some commonly used fracking chemicals to be among the most toxic in the world to aquatic life.”

Her organization is pushing to end all offshore drilling and vows to fight the Trump move in court. “We need to transition away from this dirty, dangerous practice and toward a clean-energy future.”

[page]

Numerous state agencies provided comments to the Department of the Interior as it was hashing out its offshore-drilling plans—including the California Coastal Commission and the California State Lands Commission. They were joined in opposition by the state’s Office of the Attorney General and the California Fish and Game Commission.

The Coastal Commission and State Lands Commission would be responsible for implementing federally approved coastal-management programs through the issuance of permits. In its comments to the BOEM, the Coastal Commission says it is “steadfastly opposed to any new leasing in ‘frontier’ areas of the OCS.” New drilling activities would mean new drilling platforms, pipelines “and other infrastructure that would likely cause significant adverse effects on coastal resources.”

The commission cites impacts to commercial fishing, tourism, marine wildlife and wetlands, and says that “expanded use of fracking and other well-stimulation treatments increases the risk of an oil spill occurring and potentially causing devastating statewide environmental impacts.”

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra noted in the BOEM report that oil companies were not exactly clamoring to pursue new exploratory wells in California waters even if there’s general support in the industry to undo the Obama no-drill push.

The Shell Oil Company, for example, urged Zinke in the BOEM report to “make new OCS areas available to assess the extent of United States energy resources,” as it expressed disappointment in Obama for banning offshore drilling and urged Trump to “quickly replace the current national OCS program and grant access to new areas.” Shell has numerous leases in Southern California waters. So do the Koch brothers.

Meanwhile, Chevron U.S.A., which operates an oil-and-gas refinery operation in Richmond, was less gushing in its embrace of the new drilling timetables in the BOEM report. It appears Chevron is not interested in Central or Northern California. In its comments to the BOEM, the company did say the federal government “should move expeditiously to open unavailable submerged lands with believed resource potential for exploration and development.”

But Chevron also provided a ranking to the BOEM of its most desirable areas for exploration and development, and left Central and Northern California off the list. Its first three are regions of the Gulf of Mexico. The next three are regions of the Atlantic Ocean, and “the Southern California Planning area was ranked seventh.” The company did not comment on or mention drilling in Central and Northern California in the BOEM report—or in a follow-up email sent in response to questions about its views on oil-exploration in offshore California waters.

“Chevron encourages expansion of domestic and global energy production, including development of energy resources on federal lands onshore and offshore,” says Veronica Flores-Paniagua, a spokeswoman for Chevron North America. “Our U.S. offshore priorities are continued exploration in the Gulf of Mexico deepwater, and to better understand the potential of the Atlantic waters off the East Coast.”

As it set out to reopen offshore drilling, the BOEM also heard from Florida’s Department of State and other of its agencies engaged in wildlife conservation. NASA also chimed in with concerns about offshore rigs’ affecting future space missions. Florida is led by Republican Gov. Rick Scott, who supported Donald Trump for president in 2016, as did the state as a whole. The president spends significant time in Florida, playing golf at the oceanfront Mar-a-Lago.

Zinke’s Florida flip-flop, says Monsell, “clearly shows the total incompetence of this administration. One day it’s in the plan and a few days later it’s out? That’s not at all how the process is supposed to work.”

She notes that the federal Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, enacted in 1953, “requires the administration to consider several specific factors in developing an offshore oil and gas leasing plan in light of national energy needs and the risks of offshore drilling.”

“Helping Republicans to win elections,” she adds, “certainly isn’t one of those factors.”

Letters to the Editor: January 17, 2017

New Sheriff
in Town?

Since last spring, the Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management District (PRMD) has been persecuting residents who have small medical-cannabis farms. This tactic means many families will lose annual income. Residents with agricultural residential zoned properties are given no option to contest zoning restriction on cultivation permits.

The option to go legal needs to be equally accessible to all landowners, and the final decision of approval of the application is up to the county PRMD. However, in my opinion the PRMD is stepping up using its land-use-violation jurisdiction. Using aerial surveillance, the PRMD has sent letters to every property with a greenhouse, claiming they are generated from individual neighbor complaints about commercial marijuana growing and unpermitted structures. This is a false claim based on little or no evidence. Based on talking with the numerous individual who received PRMD letters, it is apparent that no neighbors filed complaints. This is a fabricated story.

The PRMD has taken over the role of sheriff. With fines to levy and property to confiscate, the county stands to make money off growers’ hard work. This is not acceptable or fair to taxpaying citizens. The county is greedy and corrupt and needs a swift legal kick in the proverbial pants, which the feds may provide.

Sebastopol

It Makes
No Sense

I am from Alabama, and I believe that Attorney General Jeff Session can’t get out of his own way (“Alabama Slammer,” Jan. 10). I served in Iraq and am 45 years old with PTSD. Since when do I need someone to tell me what’s good for me? If I smoke pot, I have to do it illegally. What sense does that make?

Via Bohemian.com

Closing Act

David Templeton will be sorely missed (“Exit Stage Left,” Jan. 10). The Press Democrat failed miserably by ignoring theater and its importance to readers in our community. Thanks to David’s fair and intelligently written reviews in the Bohemian, culture in the North Bay was alive. Well done, Mr. Templeton. Thank you and break a leg.

Via Bohemian.com

Soul Food

Thank you, Shepherd Bliss, for this inspiring and informative article (“Down at the Death Cafe,” Jan. 10). I’m a grief counselor and have been wanting to attend a Death Cafe for years. This particular event feels very much to me like psychospiritual and emotional food for the soul. What a beautiful way to share our hearts, grief, joy and all that arises when facing death’s final frontiers.

Via Bohemian.com

Write to us at le*****@******an.com.

Safe Houses

0

Tragic losses from the October firestorms are still very fresh in our hearts and minds. Discussions about how to rebuild are difficult and sensitive. Dan Wade of United Policyholders says, “Rebuilding in a fire ecology can present unique challenges in the insurance process. Knowing how to maximize insurance benefits can help ensure that homeowners are able to rebuild with fire-resistant materials and continue to be insurable.”

There is a growing understanding that many homes in California were built in “fire ecology areas,” zones where periodic wildfire is a natural part of the ecosystem. In the 1970s, Ray Krauss worked as an environmental planner contributing to early drafts of Sonoma County’s first general plan, which, informed by research about the 1964 Hanley fire, proposed limiting development in high-risk fire hazard zones. A political backlash stifled that proposal. “If there had been acceptance of the county’s early environmental planning, many current losses could have been avoided,” says Krauss.

Recognizing fire ecology, how do we ensure responsible planning so community members aren’t put in harm’s way? When disaster strikes, how will we assist those who want to rebuild safely? To address such questions, several groups are co-organizing a series of events called Conversations Around the Fire. Over a hundred people turned out for the first event about the increasing difficulties faced by renters and those without homes.

For the second gathering, Santa Rosa Councilmember Julie Combs will be joined by Wade and Krauss to talk about “Rebuilding in a Fire Ecology.” Other speakers include Laura Neish of 350 Sonoma County on support for fire victims for rebuilding green, ethnobotanist Edward Willie on permaculture and native-land-management practices, and Teri Shore of the Greenbelt Alliance on ideal locations for new housing.

Conversations Around the Fire: Rebuilding in a Fire Ecology will take place on Jan. 22, from 6pm to 8pm, at Christ Church United Methodist, 1717 Yulupa Ave., Santa Rosa. There will be information about fire-resistant and eco-building materials, zero-net energy homes, affordable housing, cleanup standards, resource management and efforts for a resilient recovery with the big picture of climate change in mind. For information, call 707.292.4233.

June Brashares is a clean-energy professional and social justice activist.

Open Mic is a weekly feature in the ‘Bohemian.’ We welcome your contribution. To have your topical essay of 350 words considered for publication, write op*****@******an.com.

For the Ages

0

The oldest wines poured at Chateau Montelena Winery’s “Dream Tasting” held
Jan. 11—a one-of-a-kind lineup of vintages from 1974 to 2013 that, according to winery CEO Bo Barrett, may never be replicated—aren’t necessarily what most wine consumers would readily drink, or name “best.”

It’s a misperception that all wines get better with long aging in some musty cellar. What this tasting was about was how much better that musty cellar has become over those long years, and how this estate’s particular expression of Cabernet Sauvignon shows up year after year.

Bo Barrett was a surfer kid when he began working for his father, Jim, in 1972 (the two were fictionalized in the 2008 film Bottle Shock). Now silver-haired and sporting a soul patch goatee, Barrett is quick with an entertaining quip, but he’s not “selling” us on wine today—he’s our tour guide, stopping at points of interest throughout the decades, which can be tasted in the glasses in front of us.

That leafy note in the 1980? Typical of aged Cabernet, but also the old crusher used in those days beat up the stems. Later in that decade, they had a machine custom-built to crush gently and sort out the stems—although Barrett prefers not to eliminate stems completely, as they contribute cinnamic acid. On cue, the 1994 shows cinnamon and mint notes. The tannins haven’t fallen out, and aren’t gritty, either. In this decade, says Barrett, it wasn’t just the influence of wine critic Robert Parker, but a convergence of new viticultural findings from UC Davis, the growing confidence of a cadre of winemakers and an unprecedented string of vintages with favorable weather that made the modern Napa style.

The “old cask” aroma of the 1979? Montelena aged the wine in a series of progressively older barrels. The recipe has stayed the same, with only 20 percent new oak barrels contributing a toasty, graham-cracker aroma to the 2007 Cabernet. What changed in the decade of the 2000s was the harvesting practice. Montelena expected its picking crew to complain about night-harvesting the Chardonnay; instead, the Cabernet crew asked why couldn’t they pick at night too.

Besides all that, the wine has been made from the get-go from the same vineyard, using the same yeast, with the same people making and sampling the tanks twice a day during fermentation. “We want to go for batting average,” says Barrett, “not just one hit over the fence.”

After the tasting, we are released on platters of cheese and hors d’oeuvres, paired with a sample of the as-yet-unreleased 2015 estate Cabernet Sauvignon. It’s a brand-new version of that old-school Montelena style.

Chateau Montelena, 1429 Tubbs Lane, Calistoga. Daily, 9:30am–4pm. Walk-in tasting, $30; library tasting, $60. 707.942.5105. montelena.com.

Mussel Up

0

The gray days were getting to me. I know we need the rain, blah, blah, blah, but the cold, overcast weather had me feeling down last week. So I took to the kitchen.

You can’t change the weather, but you can change what’s for dinner. I’ve had enough chicken soup but wanted something warm, brothy and nourishing. I settled on a bowl of steamed mussels.

The rule of thumb used to be to consume shellfish only during months with an

r in them—September to April. The rule seems to make sense if you are harvesting clams, oysters and mussels yourself. The non-r months are warmer, and shellfish are more susceptible to toxic red tide events—and are quarantined in California for that reason during those months. The warmer months are also generally when shellfish spawn. Spawning shellfish are milky, thin and less than delicious.

I considered heading to the coast and picking my own mussels, but though better of it. I’m all for a free lunch (or dinner), but harvesting mussels on your own requires a sport fishing license, and the shellfish can be gritty with sand unless you purge them with flour or cornmeal. Not a big deal, but I didn’t feel like it. I was kind of mopey, remember?

Instead, I went to Santa Rosa Seafood, my go-to spot for seafood. The classic method for steamed mussels is to place them in a wide pan with a few glugs of white wine, a little water and some chopped garlic and shallots, and cook until all the mussels have opened. Traditionally, they’re served with crusty bread and more white wine.

That’s a fine method, but I improved on it. Instead of wine, I used hard cider. And not just any hard cider. I reached for Tilted Shed’s smoked cider. It’s subtly infused with smoked apples. If you can’t find it, any local dry cider will do.

To up the smoky quality of the dish, I added crisp diced bacon. And because my backyard Meyer lemon tree is loaded with glorious, glowing yellow fruit right now, I tossed in some chopped lemons to balance the richness of the dish. The whole thing took about 10 minutes. I felt better after the first bite.

Pick-Me-Up Cider-Steamed Mussels

3 to 4 pounds mussels

3/4 c. dry hard cider

1/3 c. water

3 slices of bacon, chopped

3 to 4 slices of lemon, roughly chopped

1 shallot, peeled and chopped

2 cloves garlic, minced

2 tablespoons butter

chopped Italian parsley

1/2 tsp. sea salt

Clean mussels by submerging under water, discarding any that are open. Place in a wide pan.

Cook bacon until crisp, but not too crisp. Drain, blot off extra fat and set aside.

Add cider, water, bacon, shallots, garlic and salt to a wide pan. Cover and heat over a medium flame until all mussels have opened, discarding those that haven’t. Add butter and let it melt.

Serve in wide bowls and sprinkle with parsley.

Zinke Stinks

Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom was one of numerous state and national Democrats to tee off on U.S Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke this morning for his decision to exempt offshore drilling in the vacation state of Florida—while failing to extend the same exemption to blue states with big tourist economies of their own.

Florida is led by a Republican governor, Rick Scott, who supported Donald Trump for president in 2016. The president spends significant time in the state, playing golf at Mar-al-Lago, a resort that boasts views of the Atlantic Ocean.

Zinke cited the impact on Florida’s tourism industry as the signal driver behind his decision to keep the drilling rigs from view of beachgoers and vacationers. The secretary did not, however, extend the same courtesy to other states with a robust tourist economy—Oregon, New York, Virginia, and of course, California.

Early on Wednesday, Newsom punched out a couple of tweets directed at Zinke that appeared to highlight that the Interior Secretary is a flaming partisan hypocrite hell-bent on fulfilling the Trump mandate to punish blue states, regardless of the appearance of flaming partisan hypocrisy.

Florida, noted Newsom, had 113 million visitors in 2016, while California had 269 million statewide visitor trips. Tourists in Florida spent $109 billion; in California, they spent $126.3 billion.

“Using this logic,” tweeted Newsom, “CA’s coast should be declared free of offshore drilling as well. Or do blue states not get exemptions?”

The Trump Administration has also been busily undoing regulations enacted under President Barack Obama in the aftermath of the catastrophic BP Deepwater Horizon rig off the coast of Louisiana in 2010.

Alabama Slammer

0

Scanning the daily headlines for a minute there on New Year’s Day, it looked like the biggest cannabis issues facing California in 2018 would center on some of the unsettled areas of policy that attended the new law that legalized the sale and purchase of recreational pot in the country’s largest and most diverse state.

Full legalization, which occurred after a rousing and affirming vote by Californians via Proposition 64 in 2016, was a moment decades in the making. Possessing up to an ounce of cannabis has been legal in the state since last January. As of New Year’s Day 2018, the new day had indeed fully dawned.

The next-day headlines spoke of long lines at places like Peace in Medicine in Sebastopol; they spoke of a cannabis-consuming populace coming out of the shadows, surprising for the number of elderly imbibers of the health-enhancing plant; and they hinted at a growing pro-pot bias even among non-users beginning to feel that a bush that springs from God’s green earth ought to be liberated from the grips of a self-defeating federal drug law that bans it outright.

The moment of full legalization in California evoked the staying power, and the suasion power, of the classic cannabis-freedom tome, The Emperor Wears No Clothes. The book came out during the “Just Say No” days of 1985 and underscored the cultural history of hemp and cannabis and their suppression in the United States. It’s a book that’s often cited as the jump-off point for a decades-long push for cannabis access as a civil right. The Emperor Wears No Clothes was and remains the major printed-matter driver for cannabis-legalization efforts in this country (sorry, it wasn’t those Cheech and Chong movies).

So on New Year’s Day, who could not take a moment to marvel at the somewhat ironic fact that, just as a president was at his most wretchedly naked and exposed—thanks to a blistering new book, Fire and Fury, from journalist Michael Wolff—the sixth largest economy in the world had just thrown cannabis into its commerce mix with very little actual fuss.

The naked-truth moment signaling cannabis comeuppance and general acceptance was not to last, as we all now know. On Jan. 4, in a move that was shocking, while not surprising at all (a wearying hallmark of the current administration), Attorney General Jefferson Sessions stepped in and rescinded the Cole Memo.

The memorandum, undertaken under President Barack Obama and former Deputy U.S. Attorney General James Cole, eased the way for states like California to enact legal weed regimes without fear of a federal crackdown on peaceful pot people and their plants and extracts. It sought to address a looming schizophrenia between states’ rights under the 10th Amendment of the Constitution, and a Federal Controlled Substances Act that equates cannabis with heroin and declares it has no medical value whatsoever. It also sought to highlight that the feds would still take an abiding interest in drug cartels and international drug trafficking, as it directed U.S. Attorneys to focus its prosecutorial discretion in that area and not work to stymie new state laws that legalized or decriminalized pot.

The Sessions pushback on legal pot put the overall health and wellness of California’s landmark Proposition 64 into question, and with it, the health and wellness of the state’s millions of cannabis consumers, recreational and medical alike.

As the month unfolds, nothing much has happened yet to amplify the Sessions announcement into on-the-ground action, but the tone and tenor of the news reports about cannabis at once shifted to consider the Sessions move and its potential implications. All eyes are now on the four U.S. Attorney’s offices in California, says Ellen Komp, deputy director of Cal NORML (National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws), who adds that the Cole Memo was a highly useful guide to state policymakers as they set out to create the new regulations that animate the state’s legalization regime. The upshot is that future states considering legalization won’t have a Cole Memo to look to for sanctioned guidance from the DOJ.

Now, says Komp, attention shifts to the U.S attorneys who occupy or will occupy Department of Justice prosecutors’ chairs in the state. One key post is in flux. Just as Sessions was announcing the rescinding of the Cole Memo, the Obama-appointed U.S. Attorney for Northern California, Brian Stretch, announced he was stepping down to join the national law firm of Sidley Austin.

Pro-pot activists and state leaders were quick to lash out at Sessions, including California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who pledged to fight the anti-pot push from the Trump White House. In a statement, Lori Ajax, chief of California’s Bureau of Cannabis Control, said her office was conferring with Becerra and other states as a new bureaucracy now tangles with a new wrinkle from the feds.

“We expect the federal government to respect the rights of states and the votes of millions of people across America, and if they won’t, Congress should act,” Ajax says. “Regardless, we’ll continue to move forward with the state’s regulatory processes covering both medicinal and adult-use cannabis consistent with the will of California’s voters, while defending our state’s laws to the fullest extent.”

Republicans in legalized states, such as Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado, also vowed to fight the Sessions move which would undo, in that state, a legalization regime that’s brought in billions in new revenues—while not delivering, as has been widely reported, on opponents’ insistence that legal weed would lead to a spike in non-adult use.

As the news of Sessions’ slap-down of the Cole Memorandum seeped out, progressive military veterans chimed in across social media to express their dismay over the lack of empathy for struggling vets, many of whom struggle with post-traumatic stress disorder and suicidal depression after their service. In recent years, cannabis has gained therapeutic acceptance among veterans and their caregivers for its various health benefits. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs has itself been slow to follow, but did announce a new policy in December that allows VA doctors to at least talk about cannabis therapy, even if they can’t sanction it.

“It’s up to the veteran to bring it up,” says Aaron Augustis of the new policy at the VA. Augustis founded the North Bay–based Veterans Cannabis Group in 2016 and has been pressuring the VA to embrace cannabis therapies ever since. At the VCG, the emphasis is on “getting healthy, not high,” and the nonprofit has been a leading advocate for cannabis therapies for veterans. On the group’s website, Augustis, its Marin-based founder and a U.S. Army combat veteran stresses that “We do not advocate cannabis as a cure-all, but as a medicinal tool that should be incorporated with other healthy tools and lifestyle choices.”

[page]

Reflecting on Sessions’ revocation of the Cole Memo, Augustis says he’s glad to be in California, where Gov. Brown and Becerra have pledged to stand up for the state law. “We’re not going to follow the Sessions lead, essentially. But you never know, and it’s kind of scary and disturbing that someone so far away can have such a potential impact on something that we’re doing here.”

To use the vernacular of the infantry, his organization is at the tip of a spear of health and wellness for a community of veterans with outsized rates of PTSD, suicide and addiction to opiates.

Augustis, an Iraq War vet, says that moving forward, he hopes the “U.S. government [will] consider the veterans’ population a little bit more, as having more weight and meaning than the average citizen who has not served in the military.” All returning veterans are or have been federal employees, “who have been entrusted with weapons of mass destruction,” he says, along with providing intelligence up the chain of command, “so we could operate and execute missions and take out the enemy. So I would say to Sessions, ‘Why are you not listening to us now over this battle—the suicides, the opiates, the PTSD—a battle of these different issues?'”

As someone with a service-connected disability, Augustis says he took strong issue with Sessions infamous comment that “good people don’t smoke marijuana.”

“Are you telling me that U.S. military veterans are not good people?”

It was curious that on the eve of the Sessions announcement instead of celebrating legal-weed access for all, pro-pot organizations offered words of caution in the so-called Blaze New World of recreational pot acceptance.

Just as the state was about to enact legalization and thus fulfill a decades-long drive by NORML, the nation’s oldest pro-legalization organization was on Dec. 29 sending out an email warning of the dangers of driving under the influence of cannabis. It seemed kind of a fuddy-duddy move when celebration was in order. But Komp says the organization was concerned about people who might jump in the car to buy some legal weed for the first time, perhaps smoke it, and then get back in the car. Not a good idea.

DUI law was one of the pot policy areas that was perhaps left for another day as California pushed to enact Proposition 64 last year. In hashing out the various and complex intricacies of a legal pot rollout, state leaders did not set a legal threshold for THC intoxication, as has been done in other legal states, including Colorado and Nevada. There’s been a long-standing pushback to setting that threshold from organizations such as NORML.

A useful explainer on the DUI conundrum over the New Year’s weekend that ran in the Los Angeles Times said the state had not set a low threshold because, for one thing, cannabis affects people in various ways, whereas alcohol pretty much gets people drunk and lowers their judgment in equally dangerous ways. Another reason: states like Colorado that do set the threshold have found themselves on the losing end of jury trials brought by the very people they’ve arrested on DUI charges. Those are expensive trials to lose.

Komp says that state guidance on DUIs and drugs is either inadequate or filled with scare tactics. NORML offered advice to bridge any DUI confusion for imbibers, and to maintain health and wellness behind the wheel: ease up on the edibles and be careful when you ingest them; for God’s sake don’t smoke and drive; and if you can’t stand on one foot for 30 seconds without losing your balance, don’t get in the car.

Another concern that popped up after New Year’s in newspapers writing on the California initiative was whether the state would be able to fully leverage its new cannabis tax regime to achieve a maximally health revenue stream, in light of an expected rush-to-dispensaries push by liberated recreational users. Medical-cannabis purchases are not subject to the state sales tax that’s levied on recreational cannabis.

The Sessions moved also highlighted the fraught health and wellness of our nation’s judicial system under an administration that has taken a less than friendly posture toward the rule of law and the role of the courts in meting out justice.

That concern just got a whole lot more localized with the abrupt departure of U.S. Attorney Stretch. His exit was curious for its timing and telling for its implication. As the deeply Republican Modesto Bee pointed out last week from the heart of the wholesome Central Valley, “Stretch’s decision allows Sessions to appoint an interim U.S. attorney just as he announced he was rescinding an Obama-era policy that paved the way for legalized marijuana to flourish in California and other states.”

Alaska, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Nevada, Washington and Oregon have all made the leap in recent years. Last week, Lisa Murkowski, the Republican senator of Alaska, joined with Gardner in blasting the Sessions move as unhealthy for her state.

Harsh pushback to Sessions also arrived from states that don’t currently have a recreational use law but do allow medical cannabis. The New York–based Cannabis Cultural Association (CCA) sued Sessions last week over his rescinding of the Cole Memo. The nonprofit works with low-income and underrepresented communities to participate in the legal weed industry with “an emphasis on criminal justice reform, access to medical cannabis and adult-use legalization.”

Cannabis Cultural Association co-founder Nelson Guerrero blew the doors open on the implications of the Sessions move: “Rescinding the Cole Memorandum threatens patients’ access to life-saving medication and thwarts restoration of communities most impacted by cannabis prohibition, while jeopardizing the careers of over 150,000 full-time cannabis-industry employees and the collection of billions of dollars in valuable tax revenues.” The CCA is also committed to ending mass incarceration, whereas law enforcement has pledged to do its part to keep the jails and prisons full of nonviolent pot offenders.

Following the Sessions announcement, the National Sheriffs’ Association, which represents some 20,000 sheriffs across the country, issued its own statement of support for the move as it said confusion and a Colorado spike in DUI drug arrests had influenced its view: “We applaud the Attorney General for this action today that brings clarity on enforcement of the law by rescinding a confusing policy brought on by the previous administration that hindered law enforcement. This will allow sheriffs to carry out their mission of upholding the rule of law and keeping their communities safe.”

The statement was sent to a Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office spokesman to gauge his view of the Sessions move. Speaking on behalf of Sheriff Rob Giordano, Sgt. Spencer Crum noted that Giordano’s “understanding [is] that Sessions is letting the attorneys general in each district decide how vigorously they want to prosecute federal law,” and added that “the sheriff would appreciate some attempt to rectify the conflict between state and federal law. We will continue to enforce state law, which allows for personal use of marijuana. Driving under the influence of marijuana will continue to be taken seriously. This federal decision doesn’t change anything we do in regards to marijuana enforcement.”

Meanwhile, legalization advocates remain in a wait-and-see mode after the Sessions’ move and hope that Becerra and Ajax will use their offices to ensure a proper and legal rollout of the new law. NORML’s Komp says she was encouraged by their respective statements that highlighted the necessity of Proposition 64 participants to be in compliance with state law. That, she offered, may make it less likely for a federal crackdown to ensue.

“It remains to be seen,” she says. “A lot will be at the discretion of the four district attorneys.”

On Monday, the DOJ announced that the First Assistant U.S. Attorney under Stretch, Alex G. Tse, was named acting U.S. Attorney for the Northern District.

Down at the Death Cafe

Putting “death” and “cafe” together seems odd. In the United States, many ignore mortality. Americans tend not to accept that they will die, much less talk openly about it, especially with strangers. Going to a favorite cafe is something to enjoy. Being in a cafe talking about death may not seem appealing, yet it can be invigorating.

Death Cafes began in Europe. More than 5,400 monthly Death Cafes now exist in over 52 countries. Initiated in 2010 by John Underwood in London, they soon began happening in Sonoma County.

Adults sit around tables, share snacks and tea, and talk about their experiences, hopes and fears. The idea is to create a comfortable, informal and respectful environment where people can talk openly.

In Santa Rosa, Tess Lorraine has been facilitating them monthly since 2014, and will begin offering them at the Sebastopol Senior Center on Friday, Jan. 19, from 3:30pm to 5pm (open to all adults). Santa Rosa gatherings are at the Fountaingrove Lodge on Saturdays.

“As we age, conversations happen regarding degenerative and life-threatening diagnoses,” Lorraine says. “The cost of denial is that we lose opportunities for the wisdom, growth and healing that can occur when we share authentically. Death is our final frontier and our lasting legacy.”

According to deathcafe.com, “At a Death Cafe, people gather to eat cake, drink tea and discuss death. Our objective is ‘to increase awareness of death with a view to help people make the most of their (finite) lives’ . . . There is no intention to lead people to any conclusion, product or course of action.”

Death Cafes offer a structure and format that encourage conversation. Laughter is not unusual, especially as people get to know each other and feel comfortable enough to share in a safe, facilitated environment. Death Cafes are an indication of growing death awareness.

For more information and to get on the monthly email list for Sonoma County Death Cafe meetings, write to te**********@*ac.com.

Shepherd Bliss is a retired college teacher. He can be reached at
3s*@*****st.net.

Open Mic is a weekly feature in the ‘Bohemian.’ We welcome your contribution. To have your topical essay of 350 words considered for publication, write op*****@******an.com.

Letters to the Editor: January 10, 2017

Back to Nature

Driving home into Sonoma County along Highway 12 recently, I was distracted by the brightly lit sign of a cross on a well-recognized hillside. Could this be a new version of the cross that had been visible from walks around Spring Lake for so many years? The same cross that had been debated by the community, then left to recede naturally into the landscape after its creator was denied access in 2012? I thought this matter had been put to rest.

The controversy over this cross has been around for 35 years. In a 2015 Press Democrat article, Chris Smith addressed the dispute saying, “The only opinions that matter are those of the couple who own the property on which the cross resides.” The owners of the property wanted trespassing to stop, and urged neighbors to contact the police.

Owner Suzanne Merner is quoted as saying, “It’s really time the hillside return to the state it was in.” She appealed to everyone to end the clash that was worsening the scarring of the land. “It’s become an eyesore.”

That was before the cross became electrified. Does anyone know if this cross is even legal? Is the property zoned commercial? This is not a yard ornament; it’s as big as an advertising sign.

I agree with the property owner. Let’s allow this piece of land to return to its natural state.

Santa Rosa

Animal-Free

It seems as though most folks aren’t concerned whether or not animals are used in the products they consume. What they may not realize is the huge potential here to lessen the impacts on our environment, the animals and our health. I simply suggest that we should be aware of our food sources, and to consider our own ideals in the process. It can be as easy as choosing dark chocolate over milk, or buying potato chips without milk powder. Have you tried the awesome nut milks or nondairy cheeses? We don’t need a cow to make these products great.

Petaluma

What If?

I wonder what the NRA’s response would be to a mass joining by members of the Antifa movement or Communist Party? At the very least, it would be fascinating to watch these Second Amendment obsessives trying to keep such an event from happening.

South Brisbane, Australia

Way to Go!

I want to thank the Trump administration for finally deciding that it is time to enforce this country’s laws against the sale and use of cannabis. Until now, our country has been losing the drug war and it is time to finally win. In fact, we are losing so badly that the cannabis industry employs hundreds of thousands of Californians with quality jobs and is poised to raise over a billion dollars for our state. But, with concerted and immediate efforts, we will finally be able to take the moral high ground and imprison hundreds of thousands of Californians, for not “a” billion dollars but for “many” billions of dollars.

Write to us at le*****@******an.com.

So Many Roads

On a Grateful Dead tour, you met the best people on Earth. People from all walks of life were drawn to Dead shows, the way Richard Dreyfuss was drawn to Devils Tower in Close Encounters of the Third Kind. But there were also narcs, feds, drug addicts, clinically insane misfits and jerks. There was a series of "religious" groups, like...

Rigged

Last week, Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom was one of numerous elected officials from around the nation to tee off on U.S. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke for his decision to exempt offshore drilling in the vacation state of Florida while failing to do the same for blue states such as California with big tourist economies of their own. The move by...

Letters to the Editor: January 17, 2017

New Sheriff in Town? Since last spring, the Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management District (PRMD) has been persecuting residents who have small medical-cannabis farms. This tactic means many families will lose annual income. Residents with agricultural residential zoned properties are given no option to contest zoning restriction on cultivation permits. The option to go legal needs to be equally accessible...

Safe Houses

Tragic losses from the October firestorms are still very fresh in our hearts and minds. Discussions about how to rebuild are difficult and sensitive. Dan Wade of United Policyholders says, "Rebuilding in a fire ecology can present unique challenges in the insurance process. Knowing how to maximize insurance benefits can help ensure that homeowners are able to rebuild with...

For the Ages

The oldest wines poured at Chateau Montelena Winery's "Dream Tasting" held Jan. 11—a one-of-a-kind lineup of vintages from 1974 to 2013 that, according to winery CEO Bo Barrett, may never be replicated—aren't necessarily what most wine consumers would readily drink, or name "best." It's a misperception that all wines get better with long aging in some musty cellar. What this...

Mussel Up

The gray days were getting to me. I know we need the rain, blah, blah, blah, but the cold, overcast weather had me feeling down last week. So I took to the kitchen. You can't change the weather, but you can change what's for dinner. I've had enough chicken soup but wanted something warm, brothy and nourishing. I settled on...

Zinke Stinks

Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom was one of numerous state and national Democrats to tee off on U.S Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke this morning for his decision to exempt offshore drilling in the vacation state of Florida—while failing to extend the same exemption to blue states with big tourist economies of their own. Florida is led by...

Alabama Slammer

Scanning the daily headlines for a minute there on New Year's Day, it looked like the biggest cannabis issues facing California in 2018 would center on some of the unsettled areas of policy that attended the new law that legalized the sale and purchase of recreational pot in the country's largest and most diverse state. Full legalization, which occurred after...

Down at the Death Cafe

Putting "death" and "cafe" together seems odd. In the United States, many ignore mortality. Americans tend not to accept that they will die, much less talk openly about it, especially with strangers. Going to a favorite cafe is something to enjoy. Being in a cafe talking about death may not seem appealing, yet it can be invigorating. Death Cafes began...

Letters to the Editor: January 10, 2017

Back to Nature Driving home into Sonoma County along Highway 12 recently, I was distracted by the brightly lit sign of a cross on a well-recognized hillside. Could this be a new version of the cross that had been visible from walks around Spring Lake for so many years? The same cross that had been debated by the community, then...
11,084FansLike
4,606FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow