Spins

0

Found Sound

Orbitones.

Opening the eyes of the ears

Bart Hopkin Orbitones, Spoon Harps & Bellowphones Ellipsis Arts

THE RECENT POPULARITY of Stomp–the raucous theater piece in which performers use such commonplace objects as trash-can lids, push brooms, and kitchen utensils to create irresistible dance rhythms–has mainstreamed the art of experimental musical instruments, which boasts among its major figures Bart Hopkin, a Nicasio resident and local musician who has arisen as this crazy genre’s keeper of the archives.

Orbitones is the second volume of experimental sounds from Hopkin–1997’s critically acclaimed Gravikords, Whirlies & Pyrophones was hailed by Billboard (the trade industry magazine that curiously does not include gravikord music on its charts) as “singularly eclectic … an enlightening look at the myriad of ways in which music can be made.”

Like its predecessor, Orbitones is an amazing journey, meticulously documented and compiling tracks from most of the genre’s most creative minds. The release includes a single 16-track CD tucked into a 96-page full-color hardbound book with a foreword by synthesizer pioneer Robert Moog and featuring an exhaustively researched series of essays on the anthology’s contributors, including avant-classical composer John Cage and Aphex Twin synthesist Richard James. The tracks veer wildly from the fanciful tonal complexity of the Latvian group ZGA’s “Back to the East” (performed on their wonderfully odd zgamoniums) to the innovative industrial noise of local musician Tom Waits’ “Sewing Machines, Squeaky Doors, and the Spin Cycle,” replete with Waits chanting the Singer-inspired “Babbachichiuija” throughout.

These strange sounds demand that we question our tired concepts of what comprises music, and force the listener to open up to the music that is all around us–not always celestial, but often strangely satisfying. As Waits says, this music has “opened up the eyes of my ears.” Who could ask for more? GREG CAHILL

Dale Watson and His Lone Stars The Truckin’ Sessions Koch

WHILE NASHVILLE gazes at its collective navel and trots out a parade of confused pretenders, Austin-based Dale Watson looms over popular country music as a man among pretty boys, a cutting-edge throwback, a maestro of supersonic honky tonk. In a more sensible era, he would be recognized as a legend in the making. Regardless, he remains the only emergent artist who could get away with singing, “I’m too country now for country/ just like Johnny Cash.”

Watson’s fourth release, The Truckin’ Sessions, finds him in signature form: a thunderous baritone, red-hot six strings, and a collection of songs that roam from diners to interstates, heartaches to temptations. The twist this time is that, as the album’s title implies, all of the tunes orbit a truck-driving theme. Lesser artists would implode amid such a seemingly narrow parameter. Watson, however, seems to thrive on the challenge, cranking out 14 diverse numbers that engage flat tires, roadside lust, trucker ethics, caffeine addiction, engine trouble, radio banter, and even an “everyday knuckleclutchin’, gearjammin’, supertruckin’ loose nut behind the wheel.”

In some ways, releasing a theme album that appeals to such a specific subculture seems like a bizarre career move for a performer struggling to establish himself in the public’s listening consciousness. On the other hand, it’s rather refreshing to hear an artist so blatantly follow his heart and inspirations. If career moves were all that Watson worried about, he’d be in Nashville hanging out with all those gutless purveyors of the “crossover effect” that is turning country into some sort of bastard child of pop.

Newcomers to the Watson oeuvre might find The Truckin’ Sessions a little overwhelming, sort of like a shot of homemade whiskey on an empty stomach. It can never hurt to acclimate oneself to the artist through his stunning debut album, Cheatin’ Heart Attack, or last year’s masterful I Hate These Songs. But when the road beckons, when the Pink Poodle Coffee Shop glows amid an endless highway night, soundtracks don’t get any better than The Truckin’ Sessions. CHRISTOPHER WEIR

Plaid Not for Threes Nothing

FEATURING guest appearances by two of electronic music’s premier divas, Plaid’s latest album is at once sophisticated and exuberantly whimsical. From the vertiginous tempo changes in the breakbeat-based “Headspin” to the marimba-spiked island sounds of “Myopia,” most of the tracks on Not for Threes have a relaxed playfulness–they’re downtempo but upbeat. But there are also moments of passionate, sad beauty, including the sinister “Extort,” with snaky, sublime vocals provided by former Massive Attack guest chanteuse Nicolette. Pixie queen Björk sings on “Lilith,” the strange, sultry otherworldliness of her voice perfectly matched to the hypnotic tattoo of exotic, organic bass and crystalline bells. It’s a fortuitous collaboration, since both Björk and Plaid match their abundant quirkiness with bold, nearly delirious musical inventiveness. MICHELLE GOLDBERG

From the December 31, 1998-January 6, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Talking Pictures

0

Rushes Hour

real Moses please stand up?

Bible scholar thrashes Spielbergian epic

By David Templeton

Writer David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This time out, he discusses Dreamworks’ ultra-reverent animated Moses movie The Prince of Egypt with the infamous and unflinching Bible scholar Jonathan Kirsch.

THE PRINCE OF EGYPT,” begins the eloquent, soft-spoken gentleman on the other end of the line, “is a visually stunning movie, a very successful work of animation. I must first say that. But the other thing I have to say is that it is a children’s movie. They have therefore chosen to leave out the awkward and embarrassing and sometimes shocking details of the life of Moses that actually appear in the Bible, details that make Moses a much more interesting figure than he is in Sunday School Bible stories or in the Charlton Heston movie–or for that matter in The Prince of Egypt.”

Jonathan Kirsch is speaking to me from the L.A. office in which he practices “intellectual property law,” a subject he has written about in various volumes. His best-selling book, 1977’s The Harlot by the Side of the Road: Forbidden Tales of the Bible–an exploration of seven biblical stories that are routinely left out of sermons and Sunday School lessons because of their graphic sex and violence–achieved a certain level of widespread infamy, as has his latest book, Moses: A Life.

In his new book, Kirsch shows his fascination with scriptural trouble spots by revealing the numerous foibles and contradictions that make Moses one of the most fascinating figures in religious literature: a non-heroic hero who broke many of the same commandments he brought to the Hebrews; a man who, according to Kirsch, showed signs of mental illness; an angry, defiant man who hid a facial disfigurement behind a veil for most of his life; a man who dreamed of entering the promised land but was denied that dream after committing a petty offense–he brought water to the Hebrews by hitting a rock with his staff, instead of ordering the rock to give water, as God had told him to–a crime so small as to call God’s own sanity and reason into question.

Above all, Moses was a man who stood up to God, sometimes even forcing God to back down. Though he later punished all those who did not respect God, Moses stood before the burning bush and demanded that God tell him his name. “I am that I am” was God’s cryptic answer.

The Prince of Egypt, of course–which had input from Jerry Falwell and hundreds of other religious leaders and others with a stake in protecting Moses’ saintly image–shows us none of Moses’ more troubling aspects. Not that it’s all fun and games: the 10 plagues–condensed into a single musical number–are rather malevolent, and the Angel of Death claiming the lives of thousands of children is certainly going to inspire some discussion on the way home from the theater. “There are things in the film that are difficult to deal with, no question about it,” Kirsch affirms. “But there is still much more bloodshed and violence and divine cruelty in the Bible than ever got into The Prince of Egypt.

“I’m not condemning the filmmakers, I want to make this very clear. The Prince of Egypt is not meant to be for an R-rated audience. The book I wrote is an R-rated book–it is for grown-ups.”

I MENTION a review of the film that began by saying–tongue-in-cheek, I suspect–that kids are never too young to learn that God will gleefully kill off the children of his enemies.

A merry burst of laughter spills out from the phone.

“I have to credit Dreamworks for that,” Kirsch relies. “They did show the Angel of Death taking the lives of little children. Because when you ‘pretty up’ God in Sunday School class, and make him into a big benign grandfather in the sky, you’re really straying far, far from the vision of God that actually appears in the Bible. The truth is, there are things in the Bible that would scare the wits out of any child.”

For instance, Kirsch notes those troubling passages in Exodus–explored in both of his own books–in which God sets out to kill Moses, but fails when Moses’ wife performs a circumcision. And no, that’s not in the movie.

“Reading this, you begin to ask yourself, ‘Why does God want to kill Moses? Why does he want to kill little babies in Egypt? Why does he want to kill the men, women, and children of Midean, which he does later in the Bible? Why does he threaten to kill the chosen people?’ This is a very deeply troubling, challenging question: ‘Why is God so bloodthirsty?’ It is perhaps the most important and crucial question you can ask about God.

“One of the defining moments in the life of Moses,” he adds, “is the point at which God says, ‘I’m sick and tired of the chosen people. I want to get some new chosen people. So I’m going to exterminate them. I’m going to carry out a genocide of the chosen people, Me, God.’ And Moses stands up to God, and argues with him, ‘Don’t do it. It’s the wrong thing to do. Keep the faith.’ And God backs down.

“So you have a human telling God what to do, and changing God’s mind. The all-knowing, all-seeing, all-powerful God, who we are told has a divine plan, of which we are part, is talked out of doing something by a mere human being.

“And that to me is one of the great defining moments of the Bible, period. Because it teaches us that meek compliance with God’s will is not always the appropriate stance. Sometimes we should talk back to God.”

Try to teach that in Sunday school.

From the December 31, 1998-January 6, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Sonoma County Steep-Slope Ordinance

Uphill Battle

Eye on the prize: Cazadero resident Tom Kelley, with his wife, Susan, and daughter Anna Marie, says that the pristine wilderness that drew him to the west county is being destroyed by irresponsible vineyard practices.

Local vineyard boom raises hackles in backwoods areas

By Dylan Bennett

THE FERTILE HILLS of western Sonoma County yield a prime climate for the prosperous vineyard industry. Yet the growth of grapes has jarred the environmental sensibilities of many country folks and recently has aroused legal and social conflict in two pristine rural neighborhoods. The incidents are just the latest in a string of similar encounters that have led to the demand for a county steep-slope ordinance to regulate the conversion of woodlands to vineyards.

Most recently, Sonoma County Deputy District Attorney Jeffrey Holtzman has filed criminal misdemeanor charges against the Peter Michael Winery and logging operator Ken Parmeter allegedly for clear-cutting 30 acres of forestland at 1,200 feet of elevation in Cazadero in late October without the required timberland conversion permit.

“It’s really shocking,” says neighbor Tom Kelly, noting that the devastation has harmed the views and caused increased erosion. “Picture in your mind the prettiest hills you’ve ever seen. Now picture a large swath bulldozed off. The topsoil is now in the south fork of the Gualala River.”

Any penalty handed down from the court in the case will likely pale in comparison to the lingering ill will generated in the rural community. “There are still major erosion issues and conversion issues,” says Cazadero resident Annie Creswell. “Where are they going to get the water? They buried a huge pile of logs in the canyon in seasonal streams above the river. That’s a breeding ground for salmon. There’s going to be an effect on the river regardless of what they do.”

Bill Vyenielo, general manager of the Peter Michael Winery, says that his company didn’t know it was required to get a permit and that the logging operator now openly says he gave false information regarding permits. “We are working with all resource agencies following the letter of the law. We are reasonable, experienced people and want to work with our neighbors.”

On Bones Lane, a narrow, tree-lined dirt road near Graton, concerns about water supply, pesticides, and corporate behavior have residents along the lane anxious about Kendall-Jackson Winery’s plan to expand its vineyards–part of nearly 8,000 acres the company has under cultivation in the state. The huge Santa Rosa-based international wine company plans to cultivate a new 127-acre vineyard for pinot noir and chardonnay grapes on a 189-acre parcel there. Forty-three acres of the spread have been cleared of an old apple orchard, and plans call for cutting 84 acres of timber.

Large amounts of winter runoff collected in ponds will irrigate the Bones Lane grapes in summer, but locals say the watershed features unique, water-scarce, “serpentine” geology, and such water collection plus the removal of trees could reduce the well-water supply for neighboring houses.

The best effort thus far to curb the harmful effects of erosion into the beleaguered Russian River and threatened salmon- and steelhead-supporting streams is the proposed hillside vineyard ordinance conceived by the Watershed Protection Alliance, a committee of environmentalists and grape growers, and submitted to the county supervisors for approval.

The basic provisions of the proposed ordinance prohibit vineyards on slopes over 50 percent, and stipulate a tiered system of stream setbacks that starts at 15 percent.

Whether the ordinance is a positive step or an empty political gesture is a bone of contention among environmentalists. Negotiations began a year ago under the leadership of Sonoma County Conservation Action, but as the provisions were finalized in September, committee members Farm Bureau president Richard Mounts and environmental attorney Kimberly Burr of Forestville both refused to sign them. Mounts says the Farm Bureau’s local board couldn’t accept a 50-foot riparian no-touch zone.

Burr charges the provisions will fail to protect wildlife habitat. He points to criteria from the National Marine Fisheries Service that call for 300-foot-wide no-touch zones around streams.

“The main reason we were there was to protect habitat, and that got taken off the table,” Burr laments. “The growers will play this ordinance like a violin. It’s just fake, a big facade.”

Rick Theis, executive director of the Sonoma County Grape Growers Association, a non-elected post he’s leaving at the end of January, disagrees. “It’s a tremendous environmental victory in terms of soil conservation and protection of streams and fisheries,” he asserts. “If you need to put wildlife habitat on the scoreboard, that game is not over.

“For those who wanted wildlife habitat to be a part, I’m certain they’re disappointed.”

ATTORNEY BURR says the proposed county ordinance, which is expected to regulate vineyard development on steep slopes by next growing season, has lent a sense of urgency to the region’s $300 million wine-grape industry to develop as much as possible before regulations take effect. In Cazadero, some residents of this heavily forested rural community say they have received letters from a winery offering to buy their property in lots as small as 10 acres.

The new county law that will prohibit vineyards on slopes over 50 percent–45 degrees equals 100 percent–also stipulates the width of no-touch zones along environmentally sensitive streams and rivers. Even if the ordinance were in force already, it would not affect the Kendall-Jackson project, so the new rules won’t provide an easy answer to the ongoing collision of residential and agricultural rights.

Part of the Graton fight centers on Kendall-Jackson’s ownership of a 1,500-foot strip that contains Bones Lane, which residents want kept at its current width. If strictly enforced, K-J’s ownership of the lane entitles the company to several yards of each neighbor’s property along the lane. “Our position is we own it because we bought it,” says K-J’s director of real estate, Tony Korman, who adds that his company has no plans to widen Bones Lane.

But residents like Edgar Castellini, a Santa Rosa Junior College English literature professor, don’t trust the large wine company not to extensively expand its operation beyond a vineyard to include a processing facility, a wider road, and increased traffic. In an ongoing lawsuit from 1994, Castellini and four other neighbors have asserted that any right-of-way on Bones Lane is limited to the existing lane.

Last year, Castellini says, the neighbors hired a hydrologist who found that the proposed K-J vineyard conversion would lower the water table in the area. Now the Bones Lane project awaits the result of an anxiously awaited environmental impact report expected to be released shortly.

The picturesque vista at the end of Bones Lane overlooks the K-J property. In the distance, the rolling symmetry of the vineyards blankets the valley floor and appears to creep into the hills. Relevant to the conflict in the west county is the environmental awareness of residents who won’t accept pesticides or further damage to the Russian River and fear the relentless push for more vineyards while the county lacks a plan to balance the vineyard growth with other considerations. “We are becoming a one-crop area,” says Bones Lane resident Ann Maurice, a local wastewater-policy watchdog. “Monoculture is bad news.”

Vineyards are indeed increasing at a dramatic rate in Sonoma County. Deputy County Agricultural Commissioner Pierre Gadd says that, because of the rapid growth, the county “doesn’t have a handle on all the acres” under vineyard cultivation beyond the rough count of 40,000 acres. That figure, up from 31,000 acres in 1987, could easily be higher. Gadd says his office will attempt a solid count this winter.

But there’s no question that Kendall-Jackson is at the forefront of this viticultural expansion. On Dec. 10, the company won county approval for its $18 million, 164,000-square-foot Stonestreet wine production facility in Alexander Valley, over the expressed opposition of neighbors and some small grape growers who don’t want the industry to change the area’s quiet rural setting.

Kendall-Jackson, which hopes to increase yield and cultivate another 1,000 acres in Sonoma County in the next two years, is pushing ahead with its expansion plans, despite opposition. “Anywhere there’s good land, we’ll be looking at it,” says K-J spokesman Mike Winters.

That’s disheartening for local conservationists who feel the company is changing the landscape to the detriment of the community. “I would love Kendall-Jackson to take an innovative stance,” muses Maurice, who adds that if she could “wave a magic wand” the wine company would plant deep-root vines that don’t require irrigation, cultivate organically, and plant only in existing open space without cutting trees or scraping hillsides. “Be like the west county, for God’s sake,” she says. “Get in step with the neighborhood.”

Such a magic wand, Korman says, isn’t realistic.

In Cazadero, neighbor Tom Kelly echoes Maurice’s position: “Think of win-win solutions,” he suggests. “Leave out the mega-spraying and the methyl bromide, and put in a world-class organic vineyard, and I think 90 percent of the community opposition would vanish.”

Paul Jaffe, owner of Copperfield’s Books, lives immediately downhill from K-J’s Bones Lane property: “It’s really a bigger environmental issue around a watershed that affects Atascadero Creek, into the bigger watershed of the Russian River, and they are all connected,” he says. “I’m sorry to see everything done on a piecemeal basis and nothing done on cumulative impacts.”

From the December 31, 1998-January 6, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Diet Resolutions

0

Resolved

New twists on an old list

By Marina Wolf

WHAT IS IT about the beginning of a new year that brings on such a plethora of self-imposed demands for dietary discipline? “I will lose 20 pounds, eat no more than two grams of fat a day, and masticate each mouthful until it slips down my throat by force of gravity alone.” It’s almost as though we are trying to convince others–and ourselves–about how good we are, or how good we want to be, the thought being the thing that counts. Or perhaps it’s that every year brings us closer to death, and by bargaining with the fates or God or the universe–I will be better, I promise–we can stave off that fateful day for another year.

The truth is, such rituals of deprivation are intrinsic to the moral relationship our society has with food; every person who participates, privately or otherwise, feeds the machine. If you manage, for example, to eat every meal at the table with no TV interruptions, you might miss some great X-Files reruns, and you’ll probably start hating your kids, but at least you’ll get a big gold star on your personal chart. You’ve become a better person. And even if–when!–you slip, you still play an essential part in the paradigm, providing moral illustration for others and fuel for your own renewed struggles.

This year, subvert the system instead of buying into it. Make your resolutions as expansive as you can. Reach out for the goodies. Get your hand stuck in the cookie jar. Be casual and curious and compassionate with yourself and all of your food desires and habits. Be bold in the face of a paradigm of deprival and scarcity.

TO HELP YOU on your way, here are ideas for some New Year’s food resolutions. Take what you like and toss the rest, as freely and easily as you might toss that bag of prunes at the back of the cupboard that you bought in a fit of resolve two Januarys ago.

Don’t hold it against yourself that you ate nuked Spaghetti-Os and scarfed on M&Ms every night for a week during deadlines. During times of stress, and the times when you feel like it, fuel is just fuel.

Experiment with one new food a month, and use it at least three times to expand your food vocabulary. Here are a few things to head the list: okra, spelt, pheasant, crispy onions out of a can.

Raise something in your kitchen windowsill other than black mold–something useful, like sprouts or parsley or oregano. Grow a Chia head if you don’t have enough sun.

Learn how to sharpen your knives with a blade and steel the way the cooks do on TV. You are the kitchen warrior. Know your weapons!

Buy a new wok to replace the one you got at Cost Plus years ago. That non-stick coating has long since flaked off and vanished down your digestive system. And no, it definitely doesn’t count as dietary fiber.

This one’s especially for poor students and other lusty but low-income types: Get out of your garret and eat out at one sit-down restaurant a month, budgeting appropriately so that an evening exploring the finer side of the gastronomic world does not come back to haunt you on your credit cards.

Put a chair in your kitchen, one that you don’t care about destroying with spills or cooking fumes. Every cook needs a place to sit down, to flip through cookbooks and rest the feet between steps in the recipe. If you can arrange it with a view, so much the better. Sprawled on a dusty purple half-chaise, even next to prosaic shelves of dried beans and canned tomatoes, you’ll feel like royalty.

Use different utensils to eat with: chopsticks, a ladle at each plate, two butter knives, fingers.

Go for a week doing your meal-planning differently than you’re used to. If you ordinarily just eat whatever you can find in the fridge or on the take-out menu, try planning menus, listing ingredients, and shopping with that list. If you normally always plan ahead, experiment with randomness by going to the store, buying only products with the letter Y on the label or only those items that come in 3-oz. cans, and see what you can make of it.

Go to a store where you’d never think of going: an Asian market, a Mexican carniceria, an up-market wine shop, an Italian deli. Buy something you’ve never seen before. If you can’t read the label and can’t tell what it is by looking at it, you get bonus points! Ask the shopkeeper what it is and how to use it, or look it up in a book. Then go home and try it.

Learn about and order the wines that you truly love, good taste and food-pairing principles be damned. Hell, spend a year investigating the relative merits of only those wines with raffia wrapped around the necks of the bottles. The research might be a challenge. But you’re up for it! Hic.

From the December 31, 1998-January 6, 1999 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Book Picks

On the Road

By Patrick Sullivan and Marina Wolf


Journey of the Wild Geese
Intentional Productions; $17.95
By Madeline Yaude Stephenson and Edwin “Red” Stephenson

THE WRITTEN WORD is yesterday’s news. Aaron Spelling and Bill Gates agree: At the dawn of the new millennium, image is king. But there are still a few recalcitrants who insist that words have power. To prove it, they point to books like Journey of the Wild Geese.

In 1946, a group of young men and women affiliated with the American Friends Service Committee (also known as the Quakers) crossed the Atlantic Ocean, eager to help rebuild a Europe shattered by war. Among these were Madeline and Red, the authors of Wild Geese. During the voyage, the two formed a friendship that blossomed into romance. But for 17 months, as they took different assignments that plunged them into the chaos of war-torn France and Poland, they had to rely on an exchange of letters to sustain their relationship. The letters make up most of this book.

Long-distance relationships don’t work, we’re often told. But the passionate exchanges captured here match the intensity of many face-to-face relationships. In an age of quickie e-mails, it’s thrilling to read the work of two intelligent people writing at length about their lives.

Some of this is deeply personal stuff: When the couple decides to consummate their relationship, Madeline writes with delicate wit about searching for birth control. But the letters also open a wide window onto post-war Europe. The authors’ words paint a vivid picture of the continent’s struggle to recover from devastation.

Wild Geese is by no means a quick read. Some of the letters, it must be said, bog down in the repetitive details of relief work. But, on the whole, the book entertains in a way that many today will find remarkable. The authors have left us with a rich record of their experiences, a book that is both a contribution to history and a damn fine read.
Patrick Sullivan


Safety and Security for Women Who Travel
Travelers’ Tales; 1998
By Sheila Swan and Peter Laufer

MOST TRAVELERS would admit that there’s a fine line between preparedness and paranoia, between being ready for whatever comes and just being nuts. Safety and Security for Women Who Travel, the newest release from Travelers’ Tales, may cross that line, but you wouldn’t want to be caught out, would you?

Travelers’ Tales, an imprint of Sebastopol’s O’Reilly press, is becoming an established leader in the field of intensely personal travel anthologies and guidebooks. The books are very thorough, offering 30 or 40 different perspectives on a travel-related subject. But when applied to the already touchy issues of women’s safety and security, that thoroughness can be almost overwhelming. The details of self-protection are mind-boggling in scope and detail. Airports, traffic stops, dating–all go under the X-ray.

Authors Sheila Swan and Peter Laufer capture Travelers’ Tales’ trademark you-are-there feel, even though they are essentially writing a series of bulleted lists, perfect for checking off before you leave. The pages are sprinkled liberally with hints from other women travelers, and the resource section is extensive.

Even so, this book should be read in conjunction with one of Travelers’ Tales anthologies, such as Women in the Wild, A Mother’s World, or A Woman’s World. All that danger, real or imagined, is a bitter pill, and these more literary selections will make it easier to swallow.
Marina Wolf

From the December 24-30, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

European Holiday Breads

0

Festive Fare

Rising hopes, golden dreams: Holiday breads from Europe follow one basic formula–some flour, some fruit, and great expectations for the year to come.

A sugar-coated tradition for the New Year

By Marina Wolf

EVERY CULTURE has its special-occasion foods, the ones prepared at certain holidays to ensure that happiness and good fortune will enter the dwelling and stay for a while. In Europe these foods are often breads of some kind, studded with fruit and spices, enriched with eggs and as much fat as the flour will hold. Italian panettone, Russian kulich, German stollen, even the unjustly maligned fruitcake … these are all richness incarnate, a prayer for prosperity rendered in dough and baked for an hour at 350 degrees.

In my family, the festivity of choice was New Year’s Eve, and the food that went with it was oliebollen. These humble, knobby little cakes, deep fried until golden, then tossed with sugar, epitomize the spendthrift nature of holiday fare: they require ingredients that must have taken my Dutch peasant ancestors a year to save for. And like other holiday dishes, oliebollen are complicated and sensitive to skill, so that the maker really does appear to be weaving a spell for the year to come.

My father was the unlikely spellweaver in our family. He brought the memories of oliebollen to America, along with an accent and libertarian tendencies, when his family left the war-shattered Netherlands more than 40 years ago. My mother, a WASPily eager woman from Utah, found a recipe to match the memories, and the tradition of New Year’s Eve oliebollen was reborn in our house.

We mixed the stiff dough in a vast Tupperware bowl, breaking a wooden spoon on it at least every other year. After the thick batter had risen twice, filling the stuffy-warm house with its yeasty burps, my father dropped bits of it into the seething amber oil, where the sticky lumps of dough bloomed into puffy golden balls that bobbed lightly to the surface, and even rolled over sometimes on their own when one side was done.

We children never got to see that part, being barred from the kitchen before the first dollop hit the oil. We did get the run of the rest of the house, though, which, in the absence of adults, became cavernous and thrilling, like a cave or somebody else’s church. After the four “little kids” went to bed, we three older children hunkered down for desultory Monopoly games that often ended prematurely in an angry hail of red plastic houses if somebody was losing too badly. The loser stomped off to watch bad New Year’s Eve countdown shows on TV, and the other players shrugged.

The outcome wasn’t important. We were just killing time until the first platter of hissing-hot oliebollen was borne out to the table.

We took eager turns at shaking the paper bag full of powdered sugar and oliebollen: the person holding the bag got first crack at the contents. The sizzling oil stained the brown paper, and eventually wore holes in the bag for the sugar to sift out in a nose-tickling haze. We laid out the still-hot cakes on layers of newspapers or paper towels on the broad dining room table, snitching a few as we went.

OF COURSE, part of the thrill of making oliebollen was staying up so late. Usually we went to bed at 3 or 4 a.m., and still the adults bustled in and out of the kitchen, or sat at the table telling stories about people we didn’t know. When we staggered out of bed the next morning, Oma (Grandma) and Dad still sat there, and the table was covered with the little bollen, in some places layered two or three thick.

No matter how many we ate, there were always more than enough to wrap up a platter of 30 or 40 oliebollen for each child’s classroom (7 classrooms getting 40 oliebollen each!), one platter for my dad’s work, if he was working, plus a big bag to keep on top of the refrigerator for the next few days. The sharing was the point, said Oma, who told tales of the old country, where happy, chatting people held open houses under windmills and stuffed themselves silly on one another’s food.

Not so here. Here the other children sniffed at our offerings–which smelled like doughnuts but looked so weird! And who knows what our neighbors did with the foil-wrapped packages we left on their doorsteps on New Year’s Day morning. But the indifference of our suburban environs never stopped my dad, who every year stood over the stove for hours on end, his usually stern face rosy from the heat.

Of the seven children, all grown now, I’m the only one who makes oliebollen. I’m not the only one who celebrates the New Year, of course. Three of my brothers married Japanese women, who make mounds of Japanese festive food for days before Dec. 31. They have friends over; they have a lot of fun. But there’s no room or time to make the oliebollen. Every December my older brother asks me, with just the faintest hint of envy in his voice, “Are you making oliebollen this year?”

The answer has almost always been “yes,” ever since I’ve had my own kitchen and people to cook for. Over electric or gas stoves, in cramped galleys or spacious country rooms, I’ve learned to listen to the dangerous whispers of the seething oil, to feel the rhythms of the dough. The first New Year’s after we met, my girlfriend and I invited all our friends to her cramped apartment and fed them oliebollen fresh from the powdering bag: there wasn’t room to set them out on the table. Once in Russia I spent tens of thousands of rubles on the phone call to my mother to get the recipe, and two hours on tracking down yeast in the bare stores.

Here finding ingredients is much, much easier. But I find myself already planning the production, marshaling my resources: the yeast, the fruitcake fruit, good light oil, thank God!, instead of the rancid sunflower seed oil we had in Russia. Our cupboard is full. Our life is good. As generations before me have done, I make ready to wish the same for all of us, in the language that I know best.

From the December 24-30, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

The Scoop

Life ‘n’ Stuff

By Bob Harris

SHOULD REPORTERS at national newspapers bother to read their own stories? Or is that too much to ask? As you probably know by now, as a source of news I consider the Murdoch press one notch above bathroom graffiti, and USA Today just a few levels down from the Teletubbie Songbook.

Even so, sometimes I’m still shocked.

The Dec. 14 issue of USA Today carried an instructively bizarre and self-contradictory piece. Written by Daniela Deane, it hailed the “free market” imposed in Chile by Augusto Pinochet, that Grinchy-looking Eichmanna-be dictator dude who’s about to go down for the small matter of killing off his opponents, which, let’s face it, is rude.

You could conceivably argue that creating one of the world’s most inequitable economies is worth the dismantling of a democratic society, the creation of death squads, decades of terror, thousands of disappearances, and the odd car bombing here and there. Of course, that would make you scum, but it’s your call.

And make no mistake, the business press thinks that’s a fair trade.

Anyhow, let’s leave that argument aside. I’m cranky and I could use a hug.

Let’s just get back to the USA Today thing.

The story in question offered these illustrations of Chile’s Pinochet-inspired free-market success: (a) strict government control over banking, including constant audits and fines to keep bankers from getting greedy and making bad loans and going out of business; (b) a social security system where a 10 percent investment is mandatory for all; and (c) laws requiring all investors to hold 30 percent of their assets in Chile for a year.

Excuse me? We can argue about whether these are good ideas. But one thing you can’t argue: Not one of these examples has anything to do with a free market.

In fact, they’re all the exact opposite–government limitations and regulations precisely to prevent the abuses inherent in free markets. What Ms. Deane has done here is like pointing to Baywatch babe Pam Anderson as an example of natural beauty. It just ain’t so.

Did the reporter even bother to think about what she was writing? It’s hard to say. But for most business writers, it’s a matter of faith that free markets are always good, that Chile’s economy is good, and that Chile’s economy is good because it has a free market.

All of which are ludicrous oversimplifications.

Most Wall Street reporting is thickly dusted with similarly unhealthy bromides. But you don’t have to be a University of Chicago economist to see the blatant contradictions in a lot of business news. You just have to be able to read and think for yourself.

Which are two traits apparently not essential to writing for USA Today.

IT SEEMS like the only thing Congress members do these days is frown about oral sex and denounce one another. That’s because these days that is all they do. But only because nobody believes in witches anymore. Then they’d really be busy.

Surprisingly, however, a couple months ago, they actually passed a federal budget. How they accomplished this when there are still 10 minutes of Monica Lewinsky’s preteen years that haven’t yet been broadcast to Fiji we’ll never know.

But somehow they managed.

You remember this Congress was elected largely on a platform of streamlining government and eliminating waste, right? Well, as the Los Angeles Times, much to its credit, recently pointed out, this year’s budget includes literally hundreds of millions of dollars for things that are, to put it gently, psychotic.

There’s stuff here the Firesign Theatre comedy troupe wouldn’t try to make up.

A few examples:

$700,000 of your money is building a pedestrian overpass in a town with a population of 306.

$15 million of your money is renovating a gravel airstrip in a town with a population of 451. (Yes, I said $15 million. It’s in Alaska. There’s oil.)

$1 million of your money is even going to something called the Thad Cochran National Warmwater Aquaculture Center. Which is at Mississippi State University. Where they grow catfish.

And who is Thad Cochran, you ask? He’s a senator from Mississippi who sits on the Appropriations Committee that approved the funding for the Thad Cochran National Warmwater Aquaculture Center at Mississippi State.

Oh. Of course.

How did this happen? Simple: by the time all the pork was added on, the final budget was over 4,000 pages long. Few, if any, of the congressmembers who signed it even read the whole thing. But (just asking):

How many of these same congresspeople do you suppose can recite much of the Linda Tripp tapes by heart?

From the December 24-30, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Talking Pictures

0

Serving the Pig

Babe: Pig in the City

By David Templeton

Writer David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This time around, he finds author Susan Chernak McElroy at home in her Wyoming ranchhouse, revved up and ready to discuss the lively but disappointing sequel Babe: Pig in the City.

It is a cold, windy and miserable afternoon in Jackson, Wyoming–and Susan Chernak McElroy is annoyed by the weather. Sort of.

“It’s awful,” she laughs. “It’s terrible. It’s so bitter and cold out. The least it could be doing is snowing. It should be snowing. I want to have a white Christmas.” This is Brightstar Farm. Actually, it’s “Three acres of sagebrush”–as McElroy describes it–that is being transformed into a reincarnation of the other Brightstar Farm that this best-selling author recently left behind in upstate Oregon. Her chickens, for the moment, are in the care of a friend in New York, until the chicken house can be built. The donkeys currently reside outside on the deck, and occasionally–when someone leaves the door ajar–they come inside the house for a visit.

McElroy, a former Humane Society educator and vetrinarian’s assistant, is the author of two bestselling books: Animals as Teachers and Healers (Ballantine, 1997) and the recent Animals as Guides for the Soul: True Stories and Reflections (Ballantine, 1998). Both are collections of stories from around the world. The first book primarilly explores the role animals have played in the recovery and rehabilitation of people with serious illnesses. The second gives examples of ways that people can learn from their pets, using the natural characteristics of animals as models of srength, determination and general good behaviour. Since publishing her first book, McElroy has been receiving hundreds of letters a week from people with stories to tell, people whose lives have been enriched, and whose hearts have been humbled, by the deeds and attitudes of animals.

Which brings us to Babe. The kindhearted pig from the Oscar nominated movie is back in a sequel, which McElroy journeyed out to see last night. She was, it is fair to say, disappointed.

Babe, I want you to know, is the first and only movie I ever actually bought to have at home,” she explains. “It’s one of the most wonderful films I’ve ever seen.”

In the first film, a quiet sheep farmer named Hoggett recognizes that his new pig has greater potential than merely to star as Christmas dinner. By the end of that movie, Babe has overcome the prejudiced attitudes of the barnyard animals–and all the neighboring humans, as well–and has risen to become a champion sheep herder. As winning a character as was Babe, whose unfailing politeness to his sheep was the secret of his success, it was the farmer that most impressed McElroy.

“I was in love with Farmer Hoggett. I was smitten,” she confesses with a laugh. “Here’s this person from this incredibly conservative, staid, traditional community–who was nevertheless a very original thinker. He was so open to the possibilities. At the beginning of that movie the narrator says, ‘This is the story of an unprejudiced heart, and how it changed our valley forever.’ And I always think, ‘Whose heart do they mean? Is it Babe or is it Farmer Hoggett?

“When the farmer sings and dances for the sick pig– I weep every time I see that,” she continues. “Farmer Hoggett was willing to come out of his ‘Comfort Zone,’ if you will. He was willing to look silly, in that scene and later when he leads the pig out compete in the sheepdog trials. When I first saw Babe, I remember turning to my husband–who doesn’t get any of this animal stuff–and I said, ‘That’s the bravest man I’ve ever seen.’ Everytime I watch it, when he says to Babe, ‘That’ll do pig. That’ll do,’ I start weeping.

“So, yes, I loved, loved, the first movie.”

And the sequel, in which Babe and Mrs. Hoggett travel to the big city for two hours of non-stop pratfalls and noisy commotion?

“Well, it’s a visual treat for the eye,” McElroy allows. “But …”

Exactly. The simple pleasures and plotting of the original are wiped away in the follow-up, replacing them with a much busier, far less appealing series of chases and escapes. Still, even though I preferred the first film, I found enough in the sequel to entertain me. McElroy, on the other hand, couldn’t quite forgive it for abandoning the spirit of the original.

“Babe, the pig, has so much to say to us,” she explains, “so much to offer, and so much to bring us. He’s wonderful and he’s wise and fantastic role model–for children or adults. Unfortunately, this movie didn’t serve the pig very well. It was all about weirdness and slapstick. It became too clownish. And the ending–with the farmer’s wife bungee jumping in an inflatable circus clown suit–was two tilts over the top. All that bizarre clownish stuff ultimately fails the pig.”

Not that Babe isn’t given opportunities to display his characteristic goodness–there just aren’t as many of them as before. The narrator does suggest the moral of the film, that “A kind and steady heart can change the world,” but after its all over, the real motivation of the filmmakers seems to be, “Bigger and bolder must be better.”

As we talk, I can’t help but wonder if Babe–so good hearted and loyal–has any precedent in the real life world of pigs.

“Do I have any pig stories?” McElroy muses. “Actually, yes. I stumbled on this one story once–in USA Today, I think–about a pot-bellied pig who brought help to her owner when the owner was having a heart attack.

“The pig only knew one trick,” she says. “It was called “Dead Piggie,” where she’d roll over on her back and stick her feet up in the air to get a treat. So when her owner was on the floor with the heart attack, the pig kept running out through a tiny dog door, scraping herself up to get out, then, whenever a car was coming, she’d flop down in the middle of the road, with her feet up, trying to get the car to stop. But for 40 minutes, people kept driving around her.

“Finally, some guy came, knocked on the door, and called, ‘Hey do you own a pig? There’s a pig in distress out here.’ And the woman called out to him, ‘Call the hospital. I’m having a heart attack.’ According to the paper, the doctors said she’d probably have been dead if another 15 minutes had gone by. Meanwhile, her dog never did anything except to run around and look excited.

“So. Like Babe, the pig showed persistence and determination,” McElroy concludes happily. “And that’s plenty, right? I mean, that’ll do, pig. That’ll do.”

Web extra to the December 24-30, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Kid Street Theatre

0

Miracle Factory

Text by David Templeton
Photos by Michael Amsler



BEN IS NOT HIMSELF TODAY. He looks the same as ever–tall for his age, lanky and lean. But as Ben steps from the van that will return him and several of his 20 brothers and sisters to the homeless shelter in a few hours, the 12-year-old is sullen, withdrawn, clearly preoccupied. His million-dollar smile is gone; there’s little sign of the enthusiastic and energetic young man that Ben has been carefully, cautiously evolving into over the last eight months.

Trailed by his various siblings, the boy trudges up the concrete steps leading to Kid Street Theatre, the one-of-a-kind youth crisis center headquartered in a long, low, red brick building near Santa Rosa’s Railroad Square. Ben pulls open the door and crosses the threshold, where he spies Linda Conklin, the founder and executive director of KST, waiting for him with outstretched arms. Ben’s face gives way to a quick, shy grin. His gaze focused firmly on his shoes, he ambles over to receive the hug that Conklin is offering.


Million-dollar smile: Ben, a homeless child who first came to Kid Street Theatre eight months ago, has blossomed, thanks to the unconditional love of the KST staff.

“I’m really happy to see you today,” she tells him. Ben is not eager to end the hug, and, sensing the darkness of Ben’s mood, Conklin is quick to intuit the cause. “Have you seen your mother?” she inquires. He nods. With practiced brevity, he mumbles a few words. He did see his mother, briefly, only yesterday.

A recovering addict, Ben’s mother has been in a residential treatment center for six months, and has been allowed only recently to make brief day trips to visit her children.


A new beginning: The creation and presentation of a new play at Kid Street is an eight-or nine-week process that will demand incredible levels of commitment from the kids involved, already facing unimagin-ably harsh challenges in their lives. A powerful process of guided expressive therapy and straightforward group discussion begins and ends every day at KST, allowing the kids to identify and work through some of their darkest feelings. The result–as hidden feelings are brought to the surface–is often intense.

“Are you missing her a lot?” Conklin asks softly. He nods again–a slight bob of his head. “Would you like to make her a card to tell her you’re thinking about her?” He would, and so, teamed up with Jesse, an older boy who’s just arrived, Ben heads out to the art tables in the main auditorium, while Conklin turns to hug the next person through the door.

That’s the drill at Kid Street Theatre. Anyone who wants a hug gets a hug, and every kid who walks in hears the words “I’m glad you’re here today.”

Because to Linda Conklin, that’s absolutely true.



KID STREET was founded six and a half years ago, on little more than a whim. Seeking to meet the needs of at-risk youth she’d met while volunteering at a Santa Rosa homeless shelter, Conklin–a former teacher with no theater background beyond owning a season pass at the American Conservatory Theater, and recovering from severe brain damage she suffered in a near-fatal car crash–wangled the use of an old warehouse, offering the kids at the shelter a safe place to spend the long summer months. To give the summer some focus, she proposed that the kids put on a full-scale musical show and used up her remaining savings to make it happen.

Eventually other kids from the neighborhood were introduced to the project–some with horrific family backgrounds and bleak prospects for the future. In the process of creating the show, they blossomed; when the day of the performance came–and the seats filled up with appreciative theater-goers–they learned for the first time what it felt like to be a star; and when the summer was over, no one wanted it to end.


During “circle time” the boys and girls, many of them in their teens, will decide the theme of this year’s play. From an open-hearted discussion of how much many of them dislike Christmas–already a difficult time for the haves of the world, and often nightmarish for those who have nothing. After a group exploration of the things they’d truly like for Christmas– a house with a chimney, a sister, to be safely off the streets, a long-absent parent to be returned to the family–the title of the play is decided: A Christmas Wish.

“What I learned that summer,” Conklin explains, “is that we all need that kind of a break. We all need a chance to feel special. Sometimes getting that break makes all the difference in how we decide to live our lives.”

The owner of the warehouse, Hal Musco, agreed. Having observed the kids’ remarkable transformations, he generously granted rent-free use of the building so Conklin could continue what she’d started.

Kid Street Theatre was born.



NOW an established private non-profit agency with a small full-time staff and concrete plans to become a chartered school in the near future, KST has expanded significantly on Conklin’s original vision. Though the central focus is still on using theater arts as a builder of self-esteem and a door-opener for the hopes of at-risk kids, KST programs now include night-time parenting classes for the parents of participating children, martial arts self-defense training for kids, bilingual tutoring in various subjects, art therapy, and organized music and singing lessons.

Though many of the kids here are homeless, KST is open to anyone at risk of falling short of their potential. Some of the youngsters are from local women’s shelters, where they are living with their moms; some are sent by the public school system–where they may be considered “problems”–as a condition of avoiding expulsion; some are referred by the juvenile court systems.


Transition: During a group-therapy art project on the theme of “safety,” Daniel, alternates between sweet-spirited gentleness and sometimes startling displays of anger and self-destructiveness. He is asked to draw a picture of what he might do to feel safe. Safety is a core issue for Daniel, who resides with his mother in a Sonoma County shelter for abused women. “He is in constant survival mode,” says Linda Conklin.

In many cases, these are kids who’ve met incredible hardship, from sleeping in a cardboard box to living out of a car. One child was forced to witness his sister’s death at the hands of their father.

More often than not, KST is the first place these kids have ever felt truly safe.

The theater itself–since moved to another former warehouse, across the tracks on Sixth Street–features a stage, dressing rooms, sound and lighting systems, all donated or built with volunteer labor. There is a junglelike garden next door, and a vast auditorium space that serves as art studio, recreation area, library, and living room, all rolled into one.


Rather than using the markers to color his paper, Daniel draws bright-red gashes–a “superhero mask,” he says–across his face. When a therapist shows Daniel his reflection in the mirror, the child shakes his fist defiantly; the process has tapped a deep well of emotion in the boy. Before the day is over, he’s found a lap to cry in, and then returned to his formerly buoyant self.

The atmosphere is positive and decidedly casual: daily staff meetings are held on “the lawn,” the grass-green carpet in the main office on which staff members stretch out, often barefoot, in a loose circle. As assistant director Laurie Kaufman works the phone to ask for donations–KST needs everything from money and volunteer hours to food and juice and things like duct tape–she laughs often, an infectious sound that often sets the kids to smiling themselves.

But the work done here is serious business. Everyone is expected to pull his or her weight, to function as part of a team. That’s not as easy as it sounds for some of these boys and girls. Teamwork is not a concept that has been valued out on the streets, where survival often depends on maintaining a distrustful and suspicious nature.


Meanwhile, Billy–Ben’s younger brother–chooses to sit by himself after learning that he will not be playing the part he’d hoped for in the upcoming play.

Since the kids come from such unstable backgrounds, every day at KST is a potential roller coaster of emotion, for the children as well as the staff and volunteers. The effort pays off in the miraculous transformations that routinely take place within these walls, as kids who’ve been taught, by the circumstances of their lives, that they are expendable, begin to realize that their lives do, in fact, have value, that their futures still hold incredible promise.

“The truth is, there’s drama here every day,” Conklin says, “but it’s usually not on the stage. I’ve seen it over and over. And I’m not exaggerating when I say that Kid Street Theatre is a miracle factory.

“I heard someone say, not too long ago, ‘Imagine if the world worked.’ And I thought to myself, I can’t imagine it not working. Because I live inside a world that works every single day.”


Laying the ground rules: During rehearsal, Ben can’t seem to concentrate.”You made a comitment to be in this play, remember?” says program director Chandra Larsen (left with Linda Conklin). “When you make a commitment, you have to work hard to keep it.”

EACH SPRING and at Christmas, the miracles begin to multiply exponentially at KST, as the kids’ energies and imaginations are poured into the creation and presentation of a brand-new show. Written by a group of kids and staff members, the shows are developed from ideas shared during “circle time,” KST’s daily group-therapy sessions in the auditorium.

This year’s show is The Christmas Wish, based on several conversations about Christmas–how “left out” the kids feel, how empty is a donated Barbie or Tonka truck on Christmas, when the child’s truest needs are for a house, a safe home, a mother released from jail, the return of a father who has run off or been killed, or a family in which to feel loved and protected. To illustrate that point, the kids came up with a story of a Santa Claus obsessed with giving toys, whose elves go on strike to protest Santa’s refusal to read the children’s letters anymore. With the help of his guardian angel, Santa comes to realize that some people have needs far deeper that anything that can be pulled from a shopping bag.

Thinking up the story, though, is just the easy part.


As the performance nears, the process is producing the anticipated emotional upheavals in the kids. Before it’s over, a handful of the kids, including Ben, will be cut from the show–all part of KST’s tough-love approach. “This is no welfare system,” Conklin says. “In here you get what you work for.”

What will follow is two months of often grueling work, in which emotions and already fragile self-images will sometimes be pushed to their growing edge. The kids will be asked to communicate and cooperate at a high level, to make a series of commitments and honor them, and finally, to put themselves in front of an audience of strangers. These are complicated requirements for some of the KST kids, requiring them to tap into deep inner resources that, until then, few people–including themselves–ever believed they possessed.

After three weeks of rewrites and brainstorming, the script is complete, and casting has begun. Chandra Larsen, KST’s program director, is going over the parts with a circle of kids and volunteers, as the play’s director, Lois Codding, looks on.


When Ben’s mother–out on a day pass from the rehab center at which she lives–visited Kid Street, she couldn’t stop crying. “I’m so ashamed,” she said. Conklin responded by telling her that everyone at KST was proud of her. “There are kids here who say, ‘I wish my mom or dad would go into rehab.’ Your children are proud of you,” she softly added. “In their eyes, you’re a hero.”

Conklin drops in to give everyone a pep talk. Every seat in the house will be full, she tells them, come “curtain time” on Dec. 12. “Those people are coming to see you,” she says. “Because they know how special you are. They know that all of you are stars.”

She turns her attention to Jack, a teen who’s been at KST since the beginning and is in charge of the lighting crew this time out. Jack lives where he can, since his mother, a working prostitute with a drug addiction, is seldom in the picture. His story stands as a perfect representation of Kid Street’s many success stories. When Conklin first encountered him, he was angry and defensive, suffering from severe emotional damage, and failing in school. On top of that, Jack was diagnosed with a debilitating eye disease that often results in blindness.


Crunch time: Emotions are in a state of upheaval by the time of the “parents only” dress rehearsal: Shelby, diagnosed with attention deficit disorder, arrives at the theater in an advanced state of agitation, having earlier been given a double dose of ritalin.

A fierce child advocate, Conklin personally meets the teachers of all the KST kids. When a school counselor once referred to Jack as “a waste of human life,” Conklin wasted no time in reporting her. “I can’t tell you how angry that made me,” Conklin says. “No kid is a waste of human life.”

For several years Jack came to KST refusing to lower his defenses. Finally, during a round of the box game–in which half-completed statements are randomly drawn from a box and the participant must complete the thought–Jack pulled the phrase “One thing I’ve realized is …” Conklin remembers bursting into tears when he answered, “I realize I’ve been a jerk. Opportunity has been knocking on my door for four and a half years. I think I’m ready to answer the door.”


Ellen, 9 years old, tells Conklin that her mother is in jail and her custody will be transferring to her father. Diane, whose 16th birthday is tomorrow, has just been informed by her father that he plans to give her up for adoption. In spite of the unimaginable stress they are under, the cast–minus a few members who dropped out at the last minute–manages to maintain a remarkable sense of focus. By the time they’ve reached the play’s end–and each child stands center stage to inform the audience of his or her most earnest Christmas wish–they’ve pulled it together and put on a magnificent show.

Asked what changed for him, Jack replied, “I finally believe that you really do love me.” For the last two years, Conklin has arranged for Jack to attend a camp for the blind and has worked out the details for him to receive medical care. Conklin reveals there is even hope now that Jack’s eyesight can be saved.

FORMAL REHEARSALS for this holiday season’s show begin, and volunteers start to show up to construct scenery. The kids repeatedly practice the song that will close the show, Burt Bacharach’s “That’s What Friends Are For.” As the weeks and days count down to show day–and the excitement and pressure continue to build–many of the kids experience some intense feelings, as their fears and frailties, their hidden hopes and expectations, rise ever closer to the surface. Then, during the final dress rehearsals, a kind of therapeutic release occurs. There are tear-filled events every few minutes. When Joe–staying with his mom and sister at a halfway house for abused women–cannot remember his lines, the frustration reaches deep into his fear-filled young life. Jane, fully dressed as a tiger, suddenly refuses to go on stage.

Another kid, playing a lion, freezes up just before his big entrance and, frozen, cannot move on or off the stage.


On the rebound: Billy, after bouncing back from his disappointment at having to play an elf, likes what he sees after visiting the makeup table, and throws himself into the part. His enthusiastic recital of “Let’s go on strike!” and “Let’s go to Hawaii!” will end up warming the hearts of the audience on show day.

A visitor, observing the volatile eruptions of genuine emotion, remarks that it seems unlikely a show can ever be pulled together in time. But this is all part of the Kid Street process. And no matter how chaotic the situation may seem, there is never a lack of hugs and warm guidance whenever tears begin to fall or sudden fears arise.

An underlying philosophy–that every breakdown is a potential breakthrough–seems to be proving itself true all through the room.

And it’s not over yet.


Christmas wishes: After weeks of hard work, the kids of Kid Street–some homeless, some abused–have reached the big day.

ON THE DAY of the performance, the kids are excited, but incredibly focused. Hundreds of paying guests have arrived–many of them having attended every KST show since the beginning–and the room is buzzing with electricity.

“I wouldn’t miss this for anything,” says Joan Betts, a longtime KST supporter. “I’ve watched these kids for years. I’ve watched the changes happen, and I’m telling you, coming out of this program, these kids will be leaders.”

When Conklin breezes in to announce that the play is about to begin, Betts adds, “She’s a powerhouse. She knows how to get the right people together. But most important–she knows what love is. She knows how to love these kids.”

Backstage, it appears that the previous days’ emotions have given way to a profound combination of peacefulness and a hard-earned sense of pride. Given a cue, the cast files calmly out front to take seats of honor–as Conklin makes opening remarks. She turns first to the kids.



“Remember when I told you guys how special you were?” She asks with a grin. “Remember that I said we would fill this place up? Well, look around you. This is all because of you.” Turning to the standing-room-only audience, she says, “When these kids walk through the door, they are all considered geniuses. They are reminded that they are capable of great things. They’re so excited to be treated that way.

“It’s amazing how many of them have risen to the occasion in putting together today’s show.”

With that, The Christmas Wish begins.


When Conklin later joins the kids onstage, she tells the deeply moved crowd, “When I first asked these amazing kids what they wanted, it was incredible to hear the things they wished for. I didn’t hear a lot of toys and stuff mentioned. What they asked for are things we all take for granted every day.” Then, surrounded by the remarkable family of Kid Street Theatre, she adds, “We’ve shown you today that it’s possible to make miracles. Now it’s up to you to go out and make some miracles of your own.”

By the time the performers each have come out to announce their own wish, there are few dry eyes in the house. The few holdouts have an even harder time resisting tears when the entire cast and crew join hands to sing: “Well, you came in loving me,/ and now there’s so much more to see,/ and so by the way I thank you./ Keep smiling, keep shining,/ knowing you can always count on me, for sure,/ that’s what friends are for, for good times and bad times,/ I’ll be on your side for ever more,/ that’s what friends are for.”

As applause thunders through the room, Conklin gleefully shouts to the others onstage, “You earned this applause, guys. So take your bows. You deserve it.”

It’s been a tough couple of months. And no one is kidding anyone–the tough days for these kids are far from over. But once again, under the gaze Linda Conklin’s unconditional high-esteem, they’ve learned they can surmount difficult circumstances to create a thing of beauty. They’ve learned that anything is possible.

Still holding hands and now beaming, the kids of Kid Street Theatre take their bows.

Kid Street Theatre, a non-profit agency located at 54 West 6th St., Santa Rosa, is accepting donations ranging from cash to duct tape. Volunteers are welcome. For details, call 525-9223.

From the December 24-30, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Holiday Beers

0

Holiday Brews

Michael Amsler



Sizing up seasonal suds

By Tom Butler

FOR THE LAST FOUR YEARS, during the week of Thanksgiving, I have hosted a holiday beer tasting at the Sonoma Wine Exchange on the plaza in Sonoma, home to what just might be the best selection of beers in Northern California. It is certainly home to some of the most knowledgeable beer enthusiasts (as they say, it takes a lot of beer to make good wine), and manager Dan Noreen always surprises this crowd of hard-to-please homebrewers, winemakers, and beer maniacs with new and delightful selections that range well beyond the ordinary.

This year we sampled 22 beers and came up with a list of stellar top 10 and a list of remainders that are at least improvements over years past. The biggest complaint was that most of the offerings from the California micros were nearly identical, with only slight differences in color and nose, but not much interesting going on in the glass. They offer, in the words of vineyard manager Jim Taylor, “what a Budweiser drinker would like for Christmas.”

The top-rated beer in the tasting isn’t really a “holiday” beer at all. It’s North Coast Brewing’s fabulous Anniversary X, released as a celebration of the growth and maturity of this Northern California micro. It’s a rich, full-bodied, beautifully balanced, strong ale, truly competitive with some of the best beers in the world. It immediately begs the question why California micros don’t make more of this topnotch style. Anniversary X harkens back to the original tradition of Anchor Brewing’s holiday ales when founder Fritz Maytag took the opportunity to experiment and explore, serving up a sort of reward for all the dedicated Anchor fans.

North Coast is followed in the ratings by an international roster beginning with Harvey’s Elizabethan Ale, a slightly syrupy, almost portlike ale, possessing lots of body and good balance. This is a beer you could have after dinner, but you wouldn’t want to be quaffing several bottles during the football game (then again, maybe you would). A classic Belgian, Scaldis Noël, joins the top three for the third year in a row with a crisp fruitiness that is completely different from, yet just as satisfying as, the Harvey’s. Rich and complex, with a bottle wrapped like a Christmas present–all blue foil and snow flakes–Scaldis Noël would make a perfect gift for any Belgian beer lover, as well as anyone looking for a special brewer’s treat during the wintertime.

The next three selections are strong ales of the classic European tradition, brews designed to carry you through the long dark winter and leave you smiling in the spring. J.W. Lee’s Harvest Ale and Fuller’s Vintage Ale are both classic, full-bodied English strong ales, while Sammichlaus Brown Ale possesses a smoky flavor and syrupy body. More than any of the other ales at the top of the list, Sammichlaus is for the die-hard strong-ale drinker, a big beer with an Alpine punch.

The tasting returned to the West Coast with Sierra Nevada’s Celebration Draft pulling seventh place. The bottled version of this beer was universally voted lower on the scale (coming in at No. 11) but at the end of the tasting a straw poll of favorites led to a third-place finish for Celebration right behind North Coast and Scaldis. Year after year, Sierra Nevada Celebration proves to be the perfect bridge between the European ales and the lighter American stylings offered by most of the micros.

Alaskan Brewing’s Smoked Porter, an alder-smoked beer with definite hints of smoked-salmon flavor–came in at No. 8. This dark brew had several people raving about its distinctive flavor (sculptor Jim Callahan’s comment: “I love this beer!”). Ninth place went to the 24th annual release of Anchor’s Our Special Ale. This brew was a little more mellow and approachable than in recent years while still maintaining its now traditional “Christmas” flavorings. Tenth place returned to Belgium with Noël, from the monks at Abbey Affligem. Noël garnered its share of praise for its full, creamy body, beautiful nose, and crisp taste.

As you consider the results, be sure to take your own taste into account. The second half of the tasting left very little to be raved about, but plenty to enjoy if you’re looking for a holiday treat without the punch of a true wintertime ale.

The complete list of seasonal beers and their respective ratings.

IF YOU’RE A FAN of big flavorful and full-bodied ales, go for the beers at the top of the list. On the other hand, if your preference–and the preference of your holiday guests–leans toward lighter fare with a seasonal flourish, you’ll find the micros from North Coast, Anderson Valley, Full Sail, Portland, and Healdsburg’s own Bear Republic to be suitable interpretations of this classic brewing style. In fact, the Bear Republic brew was actually quite nice for the lighter category beers. It did not have the strength and body one expects from “winter ales,” but it was generally well received.

You can find all of these beers at the Sonoma Wine Exchange on the plaza and at other specialty beer stores throughout the area, so even if your tastes run toward the less than daring, try one of those special beers at the top of the list and see what great beer is really all about.

One cold dark night in December you might discover that you’ve found a new friend.

From the December 17-23, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Spins

Found Sound Orbitones. Opening the eyes of the ears Bart Hopkin Orbitones, Spoon Harps & Bellowphones Ellipsis Arts THE RECENT POPULARITY of Stomp--the raucous theater piece in which performers use such commonplace objects as trash-can lids, push brooms, and kitchen utensils to create irresistible dance rhythms--has mainstreamed the art of experimental musical instruments, which...

Talking Pictures

Rushes Hour real Moses please stand up? Bible scholar thrashes Spielbergian epic By David Templeton Writer David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This time out, he discusses Dreamworks' ultra-reverent animated Moses movie The Prince of Egypt with the infamous and unflinching Bible scholar Jonathan Kirsch....

Sonoma County Steep-Slope Ordinance

Uphill Battle Eye on the prize: Cazadero resident Tom Kelley, with his wife, Susan, and daughter Anna Marie, says that the pristine wilderness that drew him to the west county is being destroyed by irresponsible vineyard practices. Local vineyard boom raises hackles in backwoods areas By Dylan Bennett THE FERTILE HILLS of western...

Diet Resolutions

Resolved New twists on an old list By Marina Wolf WHAT IS IT about the beginning of a new year that brings on such a plethora of self-imposed demands for dietary discipline? "I will lose 20 pounds, eat no more than two grams of fat a day, and masticate each mouthful until it slips down...

Book Picks

On the Road By Patrick Sullivan and Marina Wolf Journey of the Wild Geese Intentional Productions; $17.95 By Madeline Yaude Stephenson and Edwin "Red" Stephenson THE WRITTEN WORD is yesterday's news. Aaron Spelling and Bill Gates agree: At the dawn of the new millennium, image is king. But there are still a few recalcitrants...

European Holiday Breads

Festive Fare Rising hopes, golden dreams: Holiday breads from Europe follow one basic formula--some flour, some fruit, and great expectations for the year to come. A sugar-coated tradition for the New Year By Marina Wolf EVERY CULTURE has its special-occasion foods, the ones prepared at certain holidays to ensure that happiness and good fortune...

The Scoop

Life 'n' Stuff By Bob Harris SHOULD REPORTERS at national newspapers bother to read their own stories? Or is that too much to ask? As you probably know by now, as a source of news I consider the Murdoch press one notch above bathroom graffiti, and USA Today just a few levels down from the Teletubbie...

Talking Pictures

Serving the Pig Babe: Pig in the City By David Templeton Writer David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This time around, he finds author Susan Chernak McElroy at home in her Wyoming ranchhouse, revved up and ready to discuss the lively but disappointing sequel Babe: Pig in...

Kid Street Theatre

Miracle Factory Text by David Templeton Photos by Michael Amsler BEN IS NOT HIMSELF TODAY. He looks the same as ever--tall for his age, lanky and lean. But as Ben steps from the van that will return him and several of his 20 brothers and sisters to the homeless shelter in a few hours,...

Holiday Beers

Holiday Brews Michael Amsler Sizing up seasonal suds By Tom Butler FOR THE LAST FOUR YEARS, during the week of Thanksgiving, I have hosted a holiday beer tasting at the Sonoma Wine Exchange on the plaza in Sonoma, home to what just might be the best selection of beers in Northern California. It...
11,084FansLike
4,606FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow