Into the Woods

0

the arts | stage |

By David Templeton

“Everything on Earth comes to an end.”

So states the lovable, bear-like non-philosopher Boris Simyonov-Pischik, at the conclusion of Anton Chekhov’s The Cherry Orchard, the best of the four new plays that open the annual Oregon Shakespeare Festival, in Ashland. Boris’ simple sentiment about the end of things is especially apt this year in Ashland. As OSF prepares to say goodbye to Libby Appel as Artistic Director (the top-dog for 12 years, she’ll be back next year as the director of one play), and sweeps off the welcome mat for incoming AD Bill Rauch (who’ll be helming Shakespeare’s Romeo & Juliet later this season and has already instigated a number of fresh changes), it seems that every new show this Spring carries themes of greeting the new, adjusting to the lost, or in the case of The Cherry Orchard, a little of both.

Directed and newly adapted by Appel (working with translator Allison Horsley), The Cherry Orchard is hits the stage of the Angus Bowmer Theatre hauling more than 100 years of musty baggage. The play ranks among Chekhov’s most daunting works, and bears the weight of being the playwright/poet’s final work (and some argue his finest), while also carrying the scars of generations of poorly-paced, overly-reverential productions. In Appel’s hands, the notion of The Cherry Orchard as a past-it’s-prime museum piece starts melting away from the show’s opening moments, which Appel interjects with a surprising bit of casual fun, and a clever, unexpectedly funny entrance for one of the play’s major characters. In everything from the lovely, intelligent acting to the beautiful set (Rachel Hauck), this one is a triumph, both heartbreaking and emotionally thrilling, easily the best work that Appel, as a director, has done in years, a point made clearer in reading the program notes, where the director describes The Cherry Orchard as her first great theatrical love.

Lyubov Andreyevna Ranevskaya (Judith-Marie Bergan), after several years spent abroad in Europe, has returned home to her family’s ancestral mansion at the edge of once glorious cherry orchard. Deeply in debt, the family has been ordered to put up the orchard and the house for public auction; the best Lyubov and her billiards-entranced brother Leonid Andreyevich Gayev (Richard Howard) can hope for is that a rich relative will buy the property and allow them, with their children and remaining servants, to continue living there. As Lyubov foolishly throws one last party, she wrestles with the suggestion of her long-time neighbor Yermolai Alekseyevich Lopakhin (Armando Duran)—the now-wealthy son of an impoverished former orchard-worker—that she and Leonid avoid the auction-block by agreeing to cut down the orchard themselves, and sell the property in pieces to developers. No mater which course of action the siblings choose, their days among the cherry trees have apparently come to a close. They are the only ones around who have not accepted this, except perhaps for the chronically cash-strapped, reality-avoiding next-door neighbor, Boris (a marvelous Anthony Heald, who some will recognize as one of Hannibal Lecter’s most satisfying dinner companions in Silence of the Lambs). Chekhov peoples the play with a large cast of characters: daughters and sons, friends, servants, the children of servants, and in this production, all of them leap to life with performances that avoid cliché and melodrama, remaining interesting by imbuing every action and line-reading with vitality, hope, fear, despair and bushels of proud, beautifully bruised humanity.

While some productions attempt to juice things up by playing the various characters against one another, exploiting the various betrayals and deceptions to turn Chekhov’s comedy-drama into some sort of Russian ‘Dallas’ or ‘Dynasty.’ Appel is too smart, and too respectful of Chekhov, to allow such easy tactics. In this production, one is a villain, even those whose choices rob others of their greatest hopes. The tone of the play, right up its playful final line (made more-so in this translation) and a devastating auditory grace note (I’ll say no more), blends gentle doses of humor and sadness. Appel, in her reworking of the text and her sure-handed direction of the action, underscores everything with a sweet, gradually escalating sense of impending, inescapable doom. But do not think this is not a downer of a play; as heart-rending as Chekhov’s swan-song is at times, neither he nor Appel let us forget that for every ending, for every cherry tree chopped down, something new will come along to take its place, that overwhelming grief and loss are usually followed, given enough time, by love and friendship, kindness and hope.

This is a variation of the same theme explored in David Lindsay-Abaire’s Tony-nominated Rabbit Hole, directed in Ashland by James Edmondson in OSF’s smallish New Theatre. Becca (Robin Goodrin Nordli) and Howie (Bill Geisslinger) are upper-middle-class suburbians, each fighting in their own way to keep their head above water in the wake of their young son’s recent death in a car accident. Becca, after 8 months, is systematically clearing the house of reminders of Danny, removing photos from the refrigerator, giving away his toys, his clothes, his dog. Howie, working through his pain through group therapy sessions (which he attends alone), takes a more extraverted approach to his grief, telling total strangers about his son’s death, indulging in late-night viewings of Danny’s baby videos. Becca’s self-absorbed, happy-go-lucky sister, Izzie (Tyler Layton), reacts to her sibling’s sorrow mainly by ignoring it, filling the silent spaces in their conversations with casual chatter, wry observations and quick quips about things like the potential stalker status of the Runaway Bunny’s mother. Nat (Dee Maaske), the sisters’ widowed mom, has her own view of how Becca should be dealing with the loss of her son, having grieved the death of her own son, under very different circumstances. Becca, simultaneously fragile and distant, does not take her mother’s suggestions graciously, nor is she happy when Izzie casually announces that she is pregnant. This is a family that is ready to fly apart at the seams, stuck in place and unable to take first step toward healing, with everyone but Izzie either magnifying the relevance of trivial things or minimizing and avoiding the issues that desperately need addressing. When young, guilt-ridden Jason (Jeris Schaefer) appears on the scene—he’s the teenage boy who was driving the car that took Danny’s life—it is clear that the young man’s presence will either be the “first step” the family needs to move ahead, or instead—switching metaphors the way Becca changes subjects—might be the trigger that finally blows everything apart. The cast is excellent, particularly Nordli and Layton, though the comparatively inexperienced Schaefer can’t quite match the others in emotional depth and intensity; it’s not a fatal flaw, since this is a kid who isn’t on the same level as the others, realizing that he’s done something bad, but not quite understanding the depth of this family’s pain.

There is an exquisite moment late in the play where Becca sits at the table with her mother, and finally allows Nat—who is usually hiding behind a wall of gallows humor—to describe her own grief as having been like a giant brick that gradually grew smaller, until she could finally crawl out from under it, and then carry around.

“Like a brick in your pocket,” she says. And you forget it every once in a while, but then you reach in for whatever reason and there is is: ‘Oh, right.’ Which can be awful. But not all the time. Sometimes . . . it’s not that you like it exactly, but it’s what you have instead of your son, so you don’t wanna let go of it either.”

There is nothing original or groundbreaking in these people’s grief, and that is part of the point of the wise and open-hearted script; this mother and father are not exceptional. On the contrary, they are the perfectly normal, they are exactly like millions of others who’ve walked that same road before them, a point that Edmondson makes clear in the way the family’s house is replicated in identical house images painted on the back of the set. The most devastating moments in the play are nothing extraordinary, as when Howie discovers that Becca has accidentally taped over the cassette of Danny taking his first steps; it’s a small thing that carries enormous emotional weight, and the scene is beautifully played, with agonizing believability, by Nordli and Geisslinger.

On the subject of the set, designer Richard L. Hay has created a remarkably detailed home for Becca and Howie to live and fall apart in, from the working refrigerator and kitchen sink to the split-level living room, nicely crammed with books, knickknacks, and the little bits and pieces of normal people’s lives.

Normal people are nowhere in site in ‘On the Razzle,’ Tom Stoppard’s giddy, confectionary reworking of Johann Nestroy’s ‘Einen Jux Will er Sich Machen,’ already adapted by Thornton Wilder (twice) as ‘The Merchant of Yonkers’ and ‘The Matchmaker,’ which eventually evolved into ‘Hello Dolly.’ Stoppard’s verbally supercharged adaptation is like none other, a crazy, silly, crude, impossibly high-spirited farce, nicely staged in the Bowmer Theatre, directed by Laird Williamson with an eye toward dazzling color and visual flash. The set, by Michael Ganio, is worth the price of admission alone, bright, bubbly music-box of a set, with gizmos and whirligigs, screens, scrims and furniture, all spinning and whirring about like a top gone mad.

The story is a classic, a sentiment that’s affirmed by the resourceful manservant Melchior (G. Valmont Thomas), whose oft-repeated exclamation of choice is, in fact, “Classic!” Within the bustling Austrian grocery emporium of the self-important Herr Zangler (Tony DeBruno), two secret plots are about to be launched; with Zangler preparing to spend the day in Vienna proposing to his fiancé and appearing in a grocers’ parade, Zangler’s nice and ward, the virginal Marie (Teri Watts), plan to take advantage of her uncles’ absence by eloping with the besotted Sonders (Shad Willingham), whom Zangler opposes as a marital choice due mainly to Sonders’ lack of money—and his knack for saying innocent things that sound sexual. Simultaneously, Zangler’s Chief Sales Assistant Weinberl (Rex Young) is conspiring with the shop apprentice Christopher (Tasso Feldman) to close up the shop and escape to Vienna for a few hours of tantalizing life experience. That Weinberl and Christopher will accidentally end up on a date with Zangler’s fiancé Mmme. Knorr (Suzanne Irving) and her friend Frau Fischer (Teri McMahon), and that all of them will end up at the same restaurant as Zangler, Marie and Sonders, will come as no surprise. The wonderful thing about ‘On the Razzle’ is not what happens, but how much fun Stoppard has with all of the details, and especially the tangled, witty, pun-filled dialogue.

Early on, when Sonders falls on his face in front of Zangler (who is clad in his underwear in anticipation of the arrival of his new uniform), Sonders ends up clutching at the ankles of the affronted Zangler, who exclaims, “Unhand my foot, sir!”

“But I love your Niece!” replies Sonders.

“My knees?” gasps Zangler. “Oh! My Niece!”

It’s that kind of play.

The climax is predictably satisfying, with everything wrapping up neatly—and just in the nick of time. The cast is marvelous at working the jokes, milking the audience for every groan or roar of approval. It’s not classy, but it is great fun, and you might find yourself purchasing the script in the lobby, just so you can take a another trip through all of that marvelously silly word-play.

The one-and-only Shakespeare play in Ashland at the moment is ‘As You Like It,’ with ‘The Tempest,’ ‘Taming of the Shrew,’ and the aforementioned ‘Romeo and Juliet’ all opening on the outdoor Elizabethan stage in June. Unfortunately, As You Like It is the one disappointment in the first batch of shows. Directed by J.R. Sullivan, staged in the Bowmer Theatre, the central idea of this production seems promising at first. Shakespeare’s tale of banished noblemen gathering in the Forest of Arden to form a new society based on nature, poetry and love, has been transplanted to 1930’s America. The cast is dressed in weathered overcoats and work shirts, and Shakespeare’s numerous songs are performed by a series of jug bands and country-tinged singers. Clearly, the producers were aiming for an ‘O Brother Where Art Thou’ kind of vibe, but they’ve ended up closer to just, ‘O brother!’

‘As You Like It’ contains some of Shakespeare’s most beautiful and famous language, including the beloved, “All the world’s a stage” speech. Until this production, I’ve never noticed how talky this play is, as if Shakespeare strung together a bunch of clever speeches he’s written in the privy, tossing in some plot points here and there to hold it together. Blame the pacing, which inches along when it should trot, bounce and scamper, and blame the director, who’s allowed half-a-dozen misguided characterizations. The worst is Rosalind, played by the typically solid Miriam A. Laube. As written, Rosalind—the daughter of a banished lord, who follows her beloved Orlando (Danforth Comins) into the woods—is full of wisdom and beauty, the most grounded person in Arden. But Laube plays her as a perky, shallow schoolgirl, all giggly and intoxicated with love. It doesn’t work. Jaques, the melancholy nobleman who delivers the aforementioned “All the World” speech. As played by Robert Sicular, is not melancholy so much as he is irritable and bored and kind of grouchy, which takes the fun and pathos out of character. We are supposed to like Jaques and wish for him to cheer up, but in this production, his moments off stage come as a relief. Similar bad choice render much of the cast of characters unlikable, and if there is no one to like, all we are left with is a pretty set full of crabby rich people.

The set by William Bloodgood is otherworldly in an It’s a Small World or The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh mode, with the forest suggested by gliding panels of two-dimensional painted-wood leaf groupings that are added to as the play progresses. There are pleasures to be had in this production, and some surprises. The Act I wrestling match between Oliver and the hit-man/wrestler Charles (Todd Bjurstrom) is extremely well-staged, and the climactic reunion between all the various lost relatives is effectively moving. Still, compared to the vibrant energy and depth of the other three shows, the overall vibe of this ‘As You Like It’ is as flat and unconvincing as those wooden cut-out leaves hanging from the rafters.



View All


Museums and gallery notes.


Reviews of new book releases.


Reviews and previews of new plays, operas and symphony performances.


Reviews and previews of new dance performances and events.

News Briefs

March 14-20, 2007

Y’ice’ men cometh

Sweeps by Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) teams in San Rafael and Novato March 6 and 7 sparked vigils in Marin County and fearful rumors throughout the North Bay. These are not raids, says ICE spokeswoman Lori Haley, but “targeted enforcement actions” executed under the lightly named Operation Return to Sender. Federal agents are searching for people who have ignored final deportation orders–ICE calls them “immigration fugitives”–but others are also picked up. “If we go to a house looking for one of our targets and identify others who are in this country illegally, they’re also subject to arrest,” Haley explains. Immigration and Custom Enforcement currently has two teams in the Bay Area with 52 teams nationwide, and expects to have 75 by the end of the year.

Opponents of these targeted enforcement actions call them raids and say they create a climate of fear prompting this nation’s estimated 12 million undocumented residents to keep their children home from school and to avoid contact with government officials of any type. The Marin Interfaith Council and the Canal Alliance hold weekday morning vigils to witness additional ICE activities in San Rafael’s Canal district. The goal, says the Rev. Carol Hovis of Marin Interfaith Council, is “to continue to stand watch with the neighborhood to decrease the level of fear and to be a public witness to the immigrant community.”

Fears and rumors about ICE activities caused a number of Petaluma residents to skip work and keep their children home from school, although ICE had no recent activity in Petaluma. The repercussions of these raids are felt throughout the North Bay, says Ellen LaBruce, executive director of La Luz Center in Sonoma. “People are afraid to leave their homes,” she explains. “You have kids who are going to school who may have heard from other folks or witnessed parents being separated from their kids. A six-year-old is not going to understand that they’re OK because their parents have legal papers. What they see is families being broken up.” The raids drive undocumented residents underground. “They’re afraid to be seen,” LaBruce adds. “People will only go out and do what they have to do to keep body and soul together, which means decisions are made that keep them more hidden. Someone who may be a victim or a witness of a crime is less likely to come forward. Someone who has a chronic medical condition is less likely to seek treatment until it gets so out of control they have to go to the emergency room.”

Changes need to be made, LaBruce asserts. “What we are pressing for is humane reform of U.S. immigration laws by showing the human impact our schizophrenic immigration laws create.”


First Bite

In our foodie version of The Merchant of Venice, Bassanio has won an all-expenses paid time-warp vacation package to the New World for himself and several of his acquaintances. He decides to smooth things over with his old nemesis, Shylock, by inviting him along. Forgive the bastardized iambic pentameter; it’s the best we could do on deadline.

The Merchant of Venice, Act II, Scene 3 (alt-version)

Early Saturday evening, St. Helena. Bassanio has formulated a plan to save his friend Antonio from Shylock, the villain. On a trip to the New World from Venice, the timeless characters Bassanio, Shylock and Portia find themselves in the 21st century, homesick for the food of the motherland. They enter Cook, a small restaurant serving Northern Italian cuisine, and take seats around a marble bar. From high on the wall, a paper lamp, shaped like the mounted head of a horned beast, glows prettily over them; a Waitress serves them a split-bottle of Felsina ($30), a red Italian wine.

Shylock: Methinks this wine smells strangely of rubber.

Waitress: Gee, you tourists certainly talk funny. But never mind. We’ll open another. If it’s alike, then it must be the wine.

Shylock: Indeed, the nose is the same. Vulcanized!

Bassanio: Yet, it stings the palate with fine acidity. Worry not, fair wench. We’ll drink it. Here, here!

Waitress rolls her eyes and rustles a small pad and pen from her apron.

Portia: Fetch us beets and ricotta ($9), and the arugula caprese with mozzarella and roasted tomatoes ($10).

The appetizers arrive, greens tousled rakishly on the plates.

Bassanio: Verily, it’s succulent and tasty! Good waitress, make haste and bring us the mains.

The Waitress returns, bearing gnocchi with Gorgonzola cream ($16), risotto with hedgehog mushrooms, teleme and braised pork ($20) and penne carbonara with pancetta and peas ($16).

Shylock: In sooth, this tastes genuine with a twist. Chubby and chewy are these dear gnocchi. Eating such, I shall gain what I covet: a pound of flesh.

Bassanio: Why, man, Antonio will be relieved! (aside to Portia) Zounds, our plan did worketh. As for my dish, this penne hath power. Upon such savory, I rarely munch.

Portia: Like ambrosia to Zeus this risotto doth please me, though the pork is right salty.

Shylock: True, these vittles shine in flavor, but their color lacks as alabaster.

Portia: Good sir, you are quick to find fault. Let me remind you, we ordered rice and pasta.

Bassanio: I propose an antidote to the white. Waitress, bring the flourless, chocolate cake ($7)!

The three friends indulge in a most delicious dessert–squishy, sweet and rich, accompanied by crème anglaise.Exeunt.

Cook, 1310 Main St., St. Helena. Open daily for lunch and dinner. 707.963.7088.



View All

Quick-and-dirty dashes through North Bay restaurants. These aren’t your standard “bring five friends and order everything on the menu” dining reviews.

Land of the Fee

0

Photograph by Felipe Buitrago
Paper/work: Adel Olivera, left, director of the Center for Employment Training’s Immigration and Citizenship Program, talks with Rosalba Marquez.

By Matt Stroud

Abdu Christopher Marquez is a soldier. At 21, he’s a private first class with five years to go in a six-year Army National Guard reserve contract. He has a one-year-old son named Isaiah. In a few weeks, Abdu will leave Sacramento for Iraq to join the 143rd Infantry Brigade as a military cop.

Despite the many considerations you’d imagine he’d have right now, he’s got his mom on his mind. He says he’s proud of her. That’s because this year, his mother, Rosabla, is finally taking major steps toward her Application for Naturalization, the N400 classification by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

Rosabla Marquez has lived in the United States for more than two decades. She’s put herself through a marriage, a divorce, the birth of four children, five professional changes, the rise and fall of a successful entrepreneurial career and, just last year, the birth of her first grandchild. She did it all without United States citizenship. But Abdu has playfully hassled her to get official papers since he left for boot camp last year.

“I was just pushing her–‘C’mon mom, you can’t just stay like this, you gotta be something, you gotta be somebody,'” he says. “I want her to have the same opportunities I have. Being a citizen is something to be proud of, you know?”

It has other advantages, too. Though some immigrants prefer to remain as noncitizen “permanent residents,” that categorization (aka Green Card status) is akin to having one foot in the country and one foot out. Under Green Card status, immigrants can’t vote as permanent residents and, if taken into custody, don’t have rights to a lawyer, except at their own expense; they also can’t leave the country for more than six months without risk of deportation or detainment. Citizenship is preferable for some, and Abdu believes his mother is ready to take that step.

But what if his mom had to pay almost twice as much for the privilege? She’s waited 20 years, after all, and it’s not required; her Green Card status is 100 percent legal. The fee right now is $330. But what if she had to pay $595? Would he still hassle her to get her citizenship papers then?

“Oh, damn,” he says. “If money wasn’t a problem I would, but probably not.” Rosabla has struggled financially, he says, and it was a big deal for her to be able to afford to apply for citizenship this year. “I’d probably leave her alone about it if it were that much,” he says.

Take a Hike

The increased price of citizenship may come sooner rather than later. Last month, the USCIS (not the INS, which ceased to exist on March 1, 2003) proposed a price hike that would raise the cost of some 40 disparate immigration services by an average of $223.

The proposal, according to a Homeland Security fun pack released Feb. 1, is a funding issue. According to the USCIS, an application to adjust status from temporary to permanent resident is way undervalued. It currently costs $180; if the proposal goes through, it’ll cost $1,370. (Application for temporary nonimmigrant status, however, is apparently just right. It currently costs $270. Post-proposal, that fee will remain the same.)

In theory, the proposal has an upside for applicants because it seeks to eliminate some red tape. They would not have to reapply as often, and residents applying to change from, say, temporary status to permanent residency, would no longer have to waste time and money on additional applications for work status and permission to travel. The USCIS is a government-supported but self-sustaining organization. That means all released immigration documents are legally binding and required by federal law, but costs are funded only by service fees. Because of this, the USCIS is putting the price hike to a vote. The comment period began Feb. 1 and lasts until April 2. The “adjusted” fees, if approved, will not become effective until June, at the earliest.

Bureaucracy Run Amok

Ali Noorani, executive director of the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition, says the real problem is with the USCIS, which he calls a “bureaucracy run amok.” The way he sees it, throwing more money at the problem won’t help. “The spending seems arbitrary to me,” he says. “It seems immigrants will be paying a whole lot for nothing.”

Noorani says more people are waiting much longer to become citizens, even after typically required waiting periods (five years for permanent residents over 18 and three years if the applicant is a legal permanent resident married to and living with a citizen), because the Bush administration has made no investment in the naturalization process.

“The feds are increasing naturalization fees, but making no concrete commitment to improving services,” Noorani says. “If anything, this is just another brick in the wall. Who decides where the money goes?”

USCIS spokesperson Sharon Rummery responds that no one can decide better than the agency itself. “We know where our needs are, so we know what money needs to go where,” she says. The reasoning behind the fee-increase proposal is simple, Rummery says. Since USCIS is funded solely by user fees, “if we want to keep up, we need to raise costs.”

But Angelo Paparelli, an active immigration blogger, California certified specialist in immigration law and former chairman of the Immigration and Nationality Committee, doesn’t believe the USCIS has measured its costs accurately. He says that before the proposal is approved, the USCIS needs to be held accountable at a congressional oversight hearing where it shows proof of cost analyses and funding needs. “Otherwise, it sounds either like an elusory campaign for technological improvement, or a tax on wanting to become a citizen,” Paparelli says. “And isn’t citizenship something we encourage?”

Not necessarily, says Norm Matloff. A computer science professor at UC Davis, Matloff is an outspoken anti-immigration activist who’s particularly concerned with computer companies seeking to hire foreign guest workers. “Most people view illegal immigration as bad simply because it’s illegal,” he says. “I don’t look at it that way.”

Instead, Matloff asserts that immigration has the more or less the same effect, whether it’s legal or not.

“As to the immigrants themselves,” he says, “I would sympathize with them if the increased fees were to force them to stay illegal. However, I do not believe that that would happen; they’ll pay the cost, even if they have to borrow the money.”

Rosabla Marquez has avoided the price hike. But even if the price were a thousand dollars, she says she would find a way to do it, however she could. Her entire family is here, her children were born here and it’s in her best interest to become a citizen, she says. “I want to do it. I really do.”

To express your opinion on USCIS’ proposed price increases, e-mail comments to OS********@*hs.gov or mail them to Director, Regulatory Management Division, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 111 Massachusetts Ave., NW, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20529.


News of the Food

0

March 7-13, 2007

I‘m pretty skeptical of diets, and I’ve never been on one. The fact that there’s always a new fad diet making even greater promises than the last one only reinforces how specious their claims of health benefits and weight loss are. But as I was reading an article in the New York Times recently about a reported Viagra boom in Spain, I came across a diet that could have real benefits.

The Feb. 11 article (“Spain Says Adios Siesta and Hola Viagra”) describes how cultural changes in Spain are fueling surging demand for the little blue pills. Pfizer, the drug’s manufacturer, says it sold nearly 1 million boxes of Viagra last year, the equivalent of one box for every 17 men ages 18 and older. The drug is in such demand that there are reports of drugstore thefts, and Spanish women are increasingly requiring their partners to get prescriptions for the drug.

Spain is moving from a sleepy-but-sexy Mediterranean culture into a Anglo-Saxon-style, work-obsessed nation, and it’s having a negative impact on men’s libidos, the article says.

“We used to have a siesta, to sleep all afternoon, to eat well,” says Belén Alguacil Arconada, a Pfizer spokeswoman. “But now we have become a fast-food nation where everyone is stressed out, and this is not good for male sexual performance.”

Implicit in this statement is some exciting information: that eating well, taking midday naps and not working too hard is good for your sex life. If ever you needed an excuse to eat well and take it easy, this is it. A recent study in Greece, another wise Mediterranean country, found that regular naps help lower your chance for heart disease. So there’s further evidence that a long lunch followed by a nap is good for you.

What good is the so-called Anglo-Saxon lifestyle anyway? Work too much and you’re likely to die young and need to pop a pill to get it up.

Quick dining snapshots by Bohemian staffers.

Winery news and reviews.

Food-related comings and goings, openings and closings, and other essays for those who love the kitchen and what it produces.

Recipes for food that you can actually make.

UnReal Estate

0

March 7-13, 2007

The Money Issue:

A house appraised at $500,000 two years ago now sells for $400,000. “We’ve lost $100,000” wail the neighboring homeowners, who bought cheaply and expect their property values to soar each and every year. But that “lost” $100,000 is fantasy money, say real estate experts. How can you lose something you never really had?

Home sweet equity. Is the family dwelling a place of shelter and warmth, or a canny investment, destined to pay off big? Barraged by advertisements for easy financing and enticed by television shows portraying trading up or “flipping” a house as the smart thing to do, an increasing number of homeowners are viewing their primary residence less as a place to hang their hat and more like an endless money machine.

“Your home is your biggest, most valuable investment. You shouldn’t abuse it,” advises Erica Sandberg, spokeswoman for Consumer Credit Counseling Service of San Francisco.

Second mortgages. Refinancing. Home-equity loans. Reverse mortgages. Buying a place with no money down and interest-only loan payments. It’s all so easy to do. Just sign on the dotted line, get what you want now and it will all work out later, right?

“It’s not acceptable to be overly optimistic,” Sandberg cautions. “You need to look into the future and say, ‘What happens if I lose my job, what happens if my partner loses their job, what happens if the interest rate goes up?’ Get rid of the idea that you’ll be able to make it somehow. That philosophy gets people into trouble really fast.”

Home-equity loans are easy to get and offer lower interest rates than credit cards. Pull a little cash out of the old homestead and put in a fabulous kitchen, send a kid to college, buy that dream car or boat. What’s the harm? Your house is worth it, and why not have the money now rather than later?

“You can really overuse your equity,” Sandberg warns. “You can take out too much to where you tap yourself out.”

And if you take money out of your house now, don’t expect to get that same amount again later when you sell. The buy-buy-buy and borrow-borrow-borrow mentality is harmful to many people, Sandberg says. Some folks purchase a pricier place than they can afford, using fancy financing and scrambling to make the payments each month on the gamble that the property will be worth a lot more in the long run. Others use home-equity loans or second mortgages to pay for I-want-it-now luxuries or to cover daily expenses, blithely assuming they’ll be able to handle the extra payments. Homes have taken over the role of savings accounts.

“You still need cash to cover yourself in an emergency,” Sandberg explains. “That’s not the purpose of a credit card, and that’s not the purpose of your home.”

Welcome to the complex world of personal real estate, where homeownership is an important investment, but not in the same sense as income property, stocks or bonds. A home is a long-term asset, existing in a market based on supply and demand. Even when prices drop, owners still have a place to live. You can’t live in a stock or a bond.

Older people still tend to pay off their mortgages and own their homes outright before retirement, says real estate agent Golly McGinty. It’s younger generations who sometimes view their houses as the equivalent of giant ATM machines.

“It’s like putting candy in front of a baby; you’ve got it, why not use it?” she says.

When the real estate market was hot and homes were appreciating 10 to 20 percent or more annually, people gambled that home values would quickly build back the equity they had sucked out through loans. But then the market leveled off, and some folks ended up owing more than their house is currently worth.

“Real estate is not a crap game. Real estate shouldn’t be thought of as gambling,” McGinty emphasizes. “If you want to gamble, go to Reno and put your money on the table. If you want to own a home or invest in real estate, that’s different. And those are two different scenarios, owning a home and investing in real estate.”

It helps to have a long-term perspective, advises agent Beth Egan.

“Real estate is very psychologically driven,” Egan says. “If there’s only one item and four people want it, the value goes up. And I think the media plays into it very, very heavily.”

When the market was hot, the media urged people to buy immediately or get locked out of homeownership.

“What happened was that people had this false sense of value,” Egan says. “They took that false sense of value and went and got home-equity lines of credit and took that money and bought boats and cars. We became a society of haves and have-mores.”

In an average market, homes appreciate about 3 percent to 5 percent a year, not spectacular, but a steady improvement over time. Historically, Egan adds, homes double in value about every 10 years.

Asked about media hype over the real estate “bubble,” Egan rolls her eyes. In her opinion, a bubble is a trend or a fad that’s going to become outdated and replaced.

“People are always going to need houses and there is always going to be a certain demand for houses,” she points out. “The market will shake itself out, people will come back to a more realistic sense, and the market will correct itself. That’s a better word for what’s happening now: it’s a correction of the market. It’s not a bubble, it’s a correction.”

Mortgage broker Brooks Rumph agrees. “Real estate is cyclical. Everything goes up, everything comes down, everything goes up, everything comes down.”

The key is in understanding the details of any type of financing, whether it’s a no-money-down, interest-only loan or a home-equity line of credit.

“You have to be very clear what the terms are and what you’re doing,” Rumph explains.

Be skeptical of flashy advertisements for 1 percent interest rates. They’re what’s known as negative amortization, where the actual interest rate is 8 percent or more, but payments only cover 1 percent, which means after several years a homeowner actually owes a lot more money than at the start of the mortgage.

“Those ads are so incredibly deceptive,” Rumph says. “I get them [mailed to me at home] all the time that look like they come from the mortgage company I work for.” They don’t. He ends up assisting people who fall for the sales pitch and wind up angry, frustrated and desperate when things don’t work out.

Like Sandberg, McGinty and Egan, Rumph believes perspectives on home ownership have shifted.

“Somewhere down the road, people have gone from this concept of shelter and a warm place to live to an investment vehicle,” he says. “People have gone from thinking the house that they live in is their home, to thinking, ‘Ooh, I’m going to make a lot of money on this structure.'”

Investment property, Rumph says, is just that: an investment. It’s not a home. “You’re not attached to it. It’s not close to your heart–or it shouldn’t be.”

Although he agrees with Sandberg and other credit counselors that homeowners should be careful about tapping into their home’s value, Rumph says home-equity loans can be good if used judiciously.

“In a perfect world, you wouldn’t use an equity line except for home improvement. In the real world, people don’t save. An equity line can help people get through six months of trouble.”

However, applying for a line of credit while times are good, Rumph says, is a safety net.

“Life gets in our way and you never know what’s going to happen. It’s harder to get an equity line of credit when you get laid off than if you’re employed and taking it out just in case. Better to eat a little bit of equity than to lose your home in times when you lose your income.”

Sandberg, McGinty, Egan and Rumph may disagree on exactly what property owners should do, but they agree on the fundamentals. “Get as much information as possible and understand your loan programs. That’s a big key,” Rumph concludes. “Don’t get into something you don’t understand completely.”


Soulsville, USA

0

March 7-13, 2007

America is doing some serious soul-searching. After six years of treachery in the White House, opinion polls show that an overwhelming percentage of American voters would seriously consider electing a black president–and that’s good news for the charismatic senator Barack Obama of Chi-town.

How ready are we for a black president?

The pundits are already arguing if Obama is black enough.

In recent months, the country has been cozying up to soul music in a big way. The Dixie Chicks’ “Not Ready to Make Nice” might have snagged the 2007 Grammy Awards Song of the Year honors, but the snarling neo-soul single “Crazy,” from Gnarls Barkley’s funky St. Elsewhere album was the bigger radio hit. And neo-soul connoisseurs grooved last summer to British blue-eyed soulman James Hunter’s party-pleaser People Gonna Talk, which bristles with Sam Cook and Jackie Wilson sensibilities. And, of course, there’s that ongoing love affair with Dreamgirls.

Of late, Sony/BMG has launched an ambitious new reissue program that includes a Beautiful Ballads series, featuring the softer sides of Earth, Wind & Fire, the Isley Brothers, the O’Jays and Gladys Knight & the Pips, among others. In late March, the label will reissue seven digitally remastered titles by Sly & the Family Stone–the premier crossover soul band of the ’60s and ’70s, and the originators of the ubiquitous slap-bass sound–with a slew of bonus tracks.

Meanwhile, on March 13 the Concord Music Group is initiating a major reissue of Stax Records material, starting with a two-CD box set featuring 50 hit singles by Otis Redding, Sam and Dave, Booker T & the MGs, Isaac Hayes, Johnny Taylor, Albert King, the Staples Singers, Rufus and Carla Thomas, and others. The Stax 50 compilation commemorates the 50th anniversary of the founding of the seminal Satellite Records as a country music imprint in a north Memphis garage before it edged into rhythm and blues.

CMG, which acquired the Satellite, Stax and Volt catalogues as part of its 2004 purchase of Fantasy records, also plans to release definitive collections, rare performances, unreleased tracks and remixes on another 20 Stax titles throughout the year.

The beauty of the Stax/Volt label (known as Soulsville USA) was that for the most part it served as a gritty, blue-collar adjunct to the squeaky-clean sounds of Detroit’s Motown label, which billed itself as Hitsville USA. While Motown artists like Marin Gaye–with his dapper demeanor, smooth choreography and tailored Italian suits–were coolly churning out pop hits without so much as breaking a sweat, such Stax/Volt artists as the soul duo Sam and Dave were tearing up stages with a far more visceral brand of soul music.

It’s a sound that continues to resonate: the Stax/Volt roster is a staple of the classic radio format; Portishead sampled the Isaac Hayes single “Walk on By” for their song “All Mine” (used last year on a Victoria’s Secret TV ad); and Prince snared Stax/Volt artist Frederick Knight’s singing style, lock, stock and barrel.

Music industry wags report that Justin Timberlake is planning to revive the Stax label to produce contemporary R&B acts. And while that may not be black enough for you, the classic sounds on Stax 50 should serve as a scintillating soundtrack for this extended presidential campaign.

At least it’s one party that won’t let you down.


The Ag Report

0

March 7-13, 2007


The face of agriculture, as Northern Californians have known it for decades, has changed forever. Old faces have vanished and new faces have arrived. The days defined by barbed-wire fences, locked gates, crop-dusting, “No Trespassing” signs and a near-medieval state of mind have disappeared. All across Sonoma, Marin, Napa and Mendocino counties, a new generation of artisan farmers and creative ranchers have opened their fields and barns to the public and set out the welcome mat.

Pesticides and herbicides that caused cancer have been banned, and the compost pile thrives as never before. Unlike the agriculturalists of old, who prided themselves on producing the biggest crops in the fastest manner, today’s quiet agrarians believe that small can be beautiful, that slow and steady makes for good business, and that farmers, environmentalists and consumers share common ground: the planet earth itself.

Land prices are daunting, and so can be the advent of agribusiness into the lucrative organic-food economy, but small, local farmers are reinventing the ancient art of tilling the soil, carving out niches in a complex market. College-educated, worldly wise and possessing high-tech savvy, these agricultural revolutionaries have introduced new varieties into the region, and they have resurrected old ones. Even the once regal apple has made a dramatic resurgence.

Sally Graves and her husband, Mike-the president of the Marin County Farm bureau-grow a half-dozen different varieties of such heirloom apples as Pinova, Mutsu, Senshu, William’s Pride, Molly’s Delicious and Orin on their sprawling 600-acre ranch in the heart of rural Marin County. “It’s sad to see orchards pulled out, but while others are pulling out, we’re putting in,” Sally says. “We sell every single apple we pick, and we’ve derived immense pleasure from our orchard. There’s nothing as beautiful as an apple tree in blossom.”

Sally inherited Chileno Valley Ranch, a family-run enterprise since 1862, from her mother. She and Mike do the picking and pruning themselves. “We must be crazy,” she says. “We’re grandparents. In addition to apples, we grow pears; we’re doubling the size of the orchard, and next summer we’re putting in tomatoes.” Sally calls the ranch “a hybrid,” because the apples are certified organic and so are their pastures, while the cattle they raise are merely “grass-fed.” They inoculate the herd against diseases, which means that the county does not allow them to sell beef under the organic label. But they treat their cows as humanely as cows raised for beef can be treated.

“We enjoy a connection to our animals,” Sally says. “The calves live here their whole lives and they’re harvested here. A butcher slaughters and quarters three animals at a time. The meat hangs for two weeks and customers pick it up at the butcher shop.”

Today, growers not only raise the food we eat, but also, increasingly, provide a sense of place, a feeling of attachment to the earth, feeding the imagination as well as the stomach. Men and women with a hoe and seeds, hope and salesmanship serve as guardians of moral values in a world in which nothing feels deep-down rooted anymore.

In the agricultural fields of the North Bay, I hear two constant refrains: “To own a farm in Northern California, you either have to inherit it or marry into it” and “Your farm will reflect your personality.” Both seem true. Stan Denner, who is nearly 90, and who met the legendary Luther Burbank as a boy, is a fourth-generation Sonoma County rancher; in boots, jeans and cowboy hat, he’s the iconic California cowboy.

Bearded, bespectacled Lou Preston from Preston Vineyard also comes from a traditional farming family. He grew up on a local dairy, went away to college and came home to grow grapes.

“I was seriously bitten by the grape bug and had grape blinders,” Preston said at a recent panel at the Sonoma County Museum. Preston now grows prunes, apples, walnuts and olive trees. He shared the panel with Denner and with Rick Kaye, a self-described “wannabe farmer” who works as an education specialist for the Sotoyome Resource Conservation District, a local agency that lobbies on behalf of the environment and for sustainability. Kaye reminded the audience that two acres of farmland are lost every two minutes in the United States. Still, acres of farmland are also found and restored, and even outsiders like Kevin McEnnis occasionally acquire land on their own.

After graduating from UC Santa Cruz and working in Guatemala for human rights, McEnnis settled in Sonoma County in the late 1990s. He leased land from the city of Santa Rosa and began to grow vegetables on 10 acres at Quetzal Farms. At first, he did all the growing and selling himself. Then he burned out and joined with Keith Abeles, who took over much of the marketing. They sell to Green Leaf, a major San Francisco distributor, and to Oliver’s, Whole Foods and Fiesta markets. The bulk of their produce is sold in Berkeley, some of it grown to meet the exacting specifications of gourmet chefs looking for new, different tastes.

“This is a weird profession to be in,” McEnnis says as he stands in the middle of a field with a winter cover crop, a baseball hat protecting his eyes from the bright sun. “People have stereotypes. They expect ‘Farmer John’ in overalls.”

McEnnis and Abeles, who look more like Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, pay $600 a year in fees to be certified organic. “We’re found that the further away from the farm, the closer the relationships we have with customers,” McEnnis says. “In Sebastopol, we’re taken for granted. In Berkeley, where we have a cult following, they love us. They see our peppers and tomatoes, and say, ‘They’re beautiful.’ In a way, we’re fulfilling aesthetic needs.”

McEnnis and Abeles say that their farm is profitable, but they must borrow money every year. Like most, if not all farmers, they experience cash-flow problems. McEnnis adds to his income by teaching at New College. “I want the students to be able to grow their own food in keeping with ecological principles,” he says. “I bring them to Quetzal and show them what we’re doing here.” He and Abeles have also taken their message abroad; as invited guests, they attended Terra Madre, a gathering of artisan food producers held last year in Turino, Italy, sponsored by the Slow Food movement.

Nobody in local farming has the cash-flow problem solved as well as Scott Mathieson at Laguna Farms, which, surprisingly, is not organic. Mathieson has more than 400 supporters who belong to his community-shared agriculture program. For years, they have been the saviors of Laguna Farm, and they’re proud of their role. Such subscribers will play a part in saving small, locally owned farms in northern California-if the locally owned farm, that endangered species, is to be saved at all.

“We’re blown away by these carrots,” says Martha, a Laguna Farms subscriber who stopped by the place on a recent Wednesday to pick up her food. She was raised on a farm in the Midwest. “These carrots taste the way carrots taste in your wildest imagination.” Barbara, who comes from Chicago and lives a mile from the farm, says, “We need to have farms close to home. This is the way we need to go in the future.”

Imgard Kern, who was born and raised in Germany, sums up the way a great many shoppers feel. “It’s a political statement to buy from a local farm,” she says. “I like to think it’s spreading.” Michael Traugot, a Ph.D. student in agriculture at UC Davis adds, “I like the fact that the produce here is not flown in or trucked from far away. I also buy here to help prevent urban sprawl.”

One shopper had a gripe about her bill. Maitreyi Siruguri, who grew up in South India and who supervises the pickups and payments, came to the rescue. She settled the account amiably and went on keeping the books.

Mathieson used to run his CSA on the honor system, but that proved unworkable; cabbages, carrots and kale disappeared and receipts didn’t add up. The only way to prevent produce from vanishing was to keep a sharp eye on it and, more recently, to hire Siruguri to mind the store.

Laguna Farms has had problems since it started in 1986, but Mathieson maintains his utopian dreams. “Local is more important than organic,” he says, standing in the sun, wearing clogs, baggy sweatpants and a fleece jacket with a button that proclaims, “Inner Peace Is World Peace.”

Mathieson doesn’t hide the fact that his parents gave him the land and that he doesn’t have a mortgage to pay. He doesn’t hide his politics either. Some of what he says he’s borrowed from the agrarian philosopher Wendell Berry. He quotes Berry’s remark about putting culture back in agriculture, and over the years, he’s done just that. In the summer of 2007, he’ll operate the Earth Roots Field School to teach “sustainable living” and “nature awareness.”

“If you are what you eat, then what you put into your mouth is what you turn into,” he says. “What you feed the soil is what you feed yourself.” He’s certainly driven, if not preoccupied, with his farm, but he’s harvested wisdom, too. “I’m addicted to this lifestyle,” he says. “But I don’t want the farm to run me; I want to run the farm.”

Halfway across Sonoma County, directly east of Laguna Farms, a far different story unfolds at Valley End Farms on Petaluma Hill Road, near the foot of Sonoma Mountain. Valley End looks like the quintessential local farm; the rich, dark soil smells lovely after it’s newly plowed, and men and women, not machines, do the harvesting. Sharon Grossi, who owns and operates the business with her son Clint, named the farm “Valley End” because it sits, literally, at the tiptop of a long, fertile valley.

She didn’t mean the name to be prophetic, didn’t think she would live to see the end of farming in her valley, but it might turn out that way. A developer wants to build 1,600 houses across the road, Sonoma State University is expanding in her direction and the county is calling for more wetlands adjacent to Grossi’s 65-acre farm.

“They’ve got me squeezed, and I’m freaked,” she says as she sits on the sofa in the living room of her sprawling, modern farmhouse, dressed in sweatpants and a sweatshirt. “Everyone loves the farmer, and everyone loves agriculture, but everyone, it seems, wants to live in Sonoma County, and that means more houses, more traffic, more people, more cars, more malls, diminishing water and fewer farms. I want to go on living and farming here, but I’m not sure how I’m going to do that.”

Farming has been Grossi’s life. Raised by her parents on a ranch, she mended fences, milked cows and pulled heifers out of ditches. “Dad worked me like a man,” she says. “I did boy stuff all through my teen years.” She attended Cal Poly, studied agriculture and received a certificate to teach home economics, which comes in handy, she says, when deciding what crops to plant. As a young woman, she married a dairyman, reared kids, raised hay and ran the business end of the ranch before she divorced and moved away to start her own operation.

No one seems to have the latest figures, but Valley End Farm is apparently the largest certified organic farm in Sonoma County. It is certainly the largest local organic farm owned and operated by a woman, and working in the largely male-dominated world of agriculture has not been easy. “Some San Francisco distributors seem to think that women are dumb and that they can cheat me,” she says. “I have to stay on my toes.”

Grossi, who is known in the trade as the “Bean Queen,” grows four different kinds of beans, plus garlic, spinach and tons of tomatoes. She makes a decent living, but she works hard-360 days a year-and paperwork on her desk and a computer constantly beckon. Now that big farms in the great Central Valley have converted from conventional to organic because it’s more profitable, not for moral or political reasons, she finds herself squeezed at the marketplace.

“Organic is mainstream now,” she says. “It’s not a niche product anymore. The change is driving the price way down. If the trend continues, it might put small and medium size growers like me out of business. Or else I’ll have to reinvent the wheel.” Last summer she started a roadside stand on Petaluma Hill Road and sold enough vegetables to make her want to expand. She’d like to have subscribers, and open a year-round store. If Rohnert Park or Sonoma State University would adopt her farm, she’d breathe a big sigh of relief.

The farmworkers who work for Grossi seem happy enough, but organic farmers are not known to pay top dollar to laborers, and the law of supply and demand demands that they cut costs. Not paying minimum wage is one solution.

If farming in northern California is to survive, it may depend on Mexicans like Leno, the foreman at Valley End. Born and raised in Oaxaca, he worked on a farm called La Pelita before he came to the United States and obtained a green card.

“My whole family is here now,” he says. “The opportunities are bigger here, and my own dream is to own a rancho. I have a heart for farming and I plan on growing organic. Not using chemical sprays is better for all of us. There’s less of a chance of cancer.”

Growers who find a niche and work it efficiently also seem likely to survive the revolution in agriculture. Perhaps no local grower has carved out a niche more successfully than Joseph Minocchi, the quintessential hermitlike herbalist at White Crane Springs Farm, deep in the forest not all that far from the border between Sonoma and Mendocino. On a postage-stamp-size farm, fed by the freshest water around, he grows flowers, herbs and rare greens for “the elite,” to borrow his own phrase. Minocchi uses no machines and no chemicals. He works seven days a week year-round and earns the bulk of his income from his 20 ingredient “Wild and Herbal” salad mix, featuring burnet, chickweed, mache, sorrel, purslane and mallow that he sells for $30 a pound. He ships the mix in special containers that preserve its freshness to gourmet restaurants in Las Vegas, and he delivers it by hand to the Saturday farmers market at San Francisco’s Ferry Building.

“I’m beyond organic,” Minocchi says on a cold winter day when the ground is covered with frost and the sun doesn’t shine on his land. “I’m biodynamic. When I started, I didn’t want to grow the same things that everyone else was growing. I didn’t want to grow lettuce. It’s too common. So I raise tulips and watercress, which I sell for $30 a pound, and that Alice Waters loves. Once anybody tries my Wild and Herbal mix, they’re hooked, and it’s good for you, too. It tastes wonderful and it’s medicinal, too.”

He holds out his hand, his palm filled with fresh herbs, and smiles. “What more could anyone want?”

Quick dining snapshots by Bohemian staffers.

Winery news and reviews.

Food-related comings and goings, openings and closings, and other essays for those who love the kitchen and what it produces.

Recipes for food that you can actually make.

News Briefs

March 7-13, 2007

North Bay views?

Is global warming a potential threat to our local economy and quality of life? According to a recent annual survey by the Bay Area Council, 42 percent of North Bay residents think it’s “very serious” and 36 percent view it as “somewhat serious,” with only 12 percent saying it’s “not too serious,” 4 percent calling it “not at all serious” and 5 percent replying “don’t know.” Similar results were found throughout the nine Bay Area counties, with 48 percent at “very serious” and 30 percent at “somewhat serious.” That’s based on interviews by the Field Research Corporation in both English and Spanish with 600 Bay Area residents–100 of them in the North Bay counties of Marin, Napa, Solano and Sonoma–between Jan. 8 and Jan. 14. (The survey is said to be accurate by plus or minus 4 percent.)

The Bay Area Council, which represents hundreds of major employers, also asked if the state should regulate greenhouse gas emissions “across the board” by making all companies cut back 25 percent, or use a “more flexible trading system” in which firms that can’t cut back easily can pay other companies to reduce their emissions even more. The Council’s poll found that 33 percent of all respondents (40 percent of those in the North Bay) favored the make-everybody-do-it approach while 49 percent (47 percent in the North Bay) thought the flexible trading system was best.

As is done each year, the survey also asked about the biggest problems facing the Bay Area. Traffic and transportation were listed as the main challenge by 41 percent of the North Bay residents and 33 percent of everyone surveyed. In 1995, only 16 percent thought traffic and transportation were the main difficulty, while 32 percent named crime as the primary concern.

Asked if they’re better off financially than they were a year ago, 48 percent said yes in 1996. That dipped to 31 percent in 2001 and 27 percent in 2002, but rose to 42 percent this year. In 1996, 72 percent thought the Bay Area economy was in good shape, compared to 18 percent in 2002, 14 percent in 2003 and 53 percent this year.

Asked how well Gov. Schwarzenegger is doing his job, 60 percent of North Bay residents approved, 19 percent disapproved and 21 percent didn’t know; of everyone surveyed, 54 percent approved, 30 percent disapproved and 16 percent didn’t know.

Since this is a business-sponsored survey, we wonder how accurately it reflects local views. Do you think global warming is a serious threat to the North Bay? Do you favor regulating emissions by making every company cut 25 percent or letting them “trade” emission reduction requirements so the net is still 25 percent from all firms?

E-mail your opinions to ed****@******an.com with “Global Warming” in the subject line.


Mightier than the Chord

0

March 7-13, 2007

The ides of March is around the corner, and the mere anticipation of ambition has dogged every sophomore release this year so far. Even Bloc Party aren’t immune, especially with their PR flak’s lofty suggestion that their new disc, A Weekend in the City, is another OK Computer. (It isn’t.) But unlike the Killers’ musical murder of last year, Bloc Party’s concept album receives only a misdemeanor noise complaint.

“Song for Clay” kicks City off uncharacteristically, with Kele Okereke’s Morrissey-like crooning over gentle organs. “I am trying to be heroic in an age of modernity,” he wails, the first in his many personifications of London disillusionment. But just as you settle into the self-destructive murk, on comes the familiar guitar throbbing and spastic drumming.

Much of the album follows suit, with arbitrary tempo shifts and regal vocal walls that show the band trading Gang of Four for Queen. The needless synthesizer blips, symphonic swells and U2 choruses appear to exist only for the sake of bombast. But Bloc Party’s strengths–indelible melodies, taut chord crunch, shimmering arpeggios and more-soulful-than-Bowie vocals–persevere, providing enough audio Viagra to satisfy fans of their downright danceable first disc, Silent Alarm.

Sacrificed in the shuffle, though, is the proper context for Okereke’s lyrics, which run the gamut from post-9-11 paranoia (“Hunting for Witches”) to sexual promiscuity (“Kreuzberg”). While rapid axe-shredding distracts from the refreshing racism study in “Where Is Home?” everything coalesces on “I Remember,” a sugary, Echo and the Bunnymen-like gem recalling an unfulfilled young gay romance that’ll surely cause a fury of blogospheric speculation.

Any strong thematic cohesion is laid to rest by the second half, with its uniformly subdued reminiscences of youthful glory days, but Bloc Party still warrants our attention. Unlike Clap Your Hands Say Yeah, the quartet’s second record has, at the very least, staked a claim in the here and now, showing that their transcendence of buzz-band status is underway. Now, if they could just stick to one speed per song . . .


Into the Woods

the arts | stage | By David Templeton ...

News Briefs

March 14-20, 2007 Y'ice' men cometh Sweeps by Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) teams in San Rafael and Novato March 6 and 7 sparked vigils in Marin County and fearful rumors throughout the North Bay. These are not raids, says ICE spokeswoman Lori Haley, but "targeted enforcement actions" executed under the lightly named Operation Return to Sender. Federal agents are...

First Bite

Land of the Fee

Photograph by Felipe Buitrago Paper/work: Adel Olivera, left, director of...

News of the Food

March 7-13, 2007 I'm pretty skeptical of diets, and I've never been on one. The fact that there's always a new fad diet making even greater promises than the last one only reinforces how specious their claims of health benefits and weight loss are. But as I was reading an article in the New York Times recently about a reported...

UnReal Estate

March 7-13, 2007The Money Issue: A house appraised at $500,000 two years ago now sells for $400,000. "We've lost $100,000" wail the neighboring homeowners, who bought cheaply and expect their property values to soar each and every year. But that "lost" $100,000 is fantasy money, say real estate experts. How can you lose something you never really had?Home...

Soulsville, USA

March 7-13, 2007America is doing some serious soul-searching. After six years of treachery in the White House, opinion polls show that an overwhelming percentage of American voters would seriously consider electing a black president--and that's good news for the charismatic senator Barack Obama of Chi-town.How ready are we for a black president?The pundits are already arguing if Obama is...

The Ag Report

March 7-13, 2007The face of agriculture, as Northern Californians have known it for decades, has changed forever. Old faces have vanished and new faces have arrived. The days defined by barbed-wire fences, locked gates, crop-dusting, "No Trespassing" signs and a near-medieval state of mind have disappeared. All across Sonoma, Marin, Napa and Mendocino counties, a new generation of artisan...

News Briefs

March 7-13, 2007 North Bay views?Is global warming a potential threat to our local economy and quality of life? According to a recent annual survey by the Bay Area Council, 42 percent of North Bay residents think it's "very serious" and 36 percent view it as "somewhat serious," with only 12 percent saying it's "not too serious," 4 percent calling...

Mightier than the Chord

March 7-13, 2007The ides of March is around the corner, and the mere anticipation of ambition has dogged every sophomore release this year so far. Even Bloc Party aren't immune, especially with their PR flak's lofty suggestion that their new disc, A Weekend in the City, is another OK Computer. (It isn't.) But unlike the Killers' musical murder of...
11,084FansLike
4,606FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow