Drain the Pain

Bear with me, Dear Reader, while I tell my CBD story. I was in pain and found it uncomfortable to sit, stand or just move. Usually, when severe pain strikes, I pop pills and apply ice and heat. But a package from Jessica Bernardo at Canna Bath Co. (cannabathco.com) arrived in the mail. I knew it contained the CBD patches for pain that I’ve come to think of as cannabis Band-Aids. I opened the package, removed the backing on a patch and applied the sticky side down on ground zero of my pain.

Slowly, I felt the CBD working, along with the Lidocaine and the menthol that the patches contain. For extra relief, I ate a 10-milligram THC gummy and felt my stress drop, but then—before I should have—I went back to my computer.

The pain came back, though not as badly as before. I went for a walk, took a hot bath, massaged my back as best I could and applied another CBD patch. The second time it kicked in faster than the first time. Then I called Bernardo in Oakland and told her that her product was working for me, which made both of us happy.

“If you want to know about me,” Bernardo said, “I’m 34 and have therapy in my blood. I have grown marijuana, been in the THC market but switched to CBD because it’s bigger and less hassle. CBD has helped greatly with my menstrual pain. My topicals are available in small retail shops around the country. Before long, I hope to be in Target and Whole Foods.

“I also manufacture oils, lotions and creams. I want people to be out of pain without using harmful pharmaceuticals and opioids.”

I’ve been writing about cannabis for the Bohemian for so long I can’t remember when I started, though I do know I’ve never actually recommended a single marijuana product. But as a savvy patient who doctors himself as much as possible, I’m confident recommending Canna Bath’s pain patches. The patient absorbs the CBD through the skin, not the digestive or the pulmonary system. The bottom line is: don’t tolerate pain unless you’re a masochist and want it. “No pain, no gain” is bull.

Jonah Raskin is the author of “Dark Day, Dark Night: A Marijuana Murder Mystery.”

Going Dark

0

Running a theater company anywhere is never easy—but running one in the North Bay has been even more challenging than usual for the past few years. Many companies rely on the ticket sales from one show to finance the next one, so the loss of even a single performance can have significant consequences on a company’s continued survival.

In 2017, the Nuns, Tubbs and Pocket fires led to the early closure or cancellation of most local theatrical productions. Some shows opened and closed the same weekend. One lingering impact of those events has been a reduction in season subscription sales and renewals.

In 2019, the Kincade fire and PG&E Public Safety Power Shutoffs brought the lights down again on almost every North Bay show running at the time. Two shows did not reopen.

This year local companies have struggled with the effect of California Assembly Bill 5 (AB-5) on their organizations. Confusion and concern over the “Gig-Economy Bill”, whose original targets were entities like Uber and Lyft, has already resulted in several Bay Area theater companies cancelling shows or shutting down completely.

And now, as we enter into the uncharted territory that is COVID-19, the curtain has fallen one more time on local live theater, albeit for completely understandable reasons. You’ll forgive the theater community for feeling a bit Book of Job-ish.

Once again companies have shortened runs, postponed openings and outright canceled a few productions. Theater artists, who live for the audience, are struggling to come to grips with the reality that the state is prohibiting or discouraging the very nature of the experience they offer—the gathering of community and the sharing of art— as it could be detrimental to the well-being of their community.

The arts are a vital part of this community and your North Bay friends and neighbors in the arts could really use your support right now. If you have a ticket to a show that’s been canceled, consider not asking for a refund and just donate the cost of the ticket back to the theater. If, after they’ve lifted the restrictions on public gatherings, you have a ticket to a show that reopens, please attend.

While it’s understandable that under the current circumstances attending theater may be the furthest thing from your mind, once things return to some semblance of normalcy it would be great if you grabbed someone and said, “Hey, let’s go see a show.” There are hundreds of people who will thank you.

Local Cities Consider Eviction Protections

As activists across the state continue to call for a temporary moratorium on evictions caused by lost wages due to the coronavirus pandemic, elected officials in Sonoma County are beginning to tackle the problem.

In the North Bay, an as-yet-unknown number of workers have lost wages or their jobs. But the question of whether rent payments will be paused temporarily has been the subject of a game of political hot potato between local governments and the state over the past week.

In two separate statements at public events earlier this week, Susan Gorin, the chair of the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, indicated she was waiting for the state to take action on the issue.

“We’re looking for guidance from the state level on many of these issues,” Gorin said at a Tuesday virtual town hall on KRCB, when asked whether the county would follow other local governments in passing a temporary ban on evictions.

But, in an Executive Order signed on Monday, Gov. Gavin Newsom essentially handed the issue back to local governments to deal with.

Newsom’s Executive Order “authorizes” cities to pass their own eviction bans and removes some potential legal barriers to them doing so. Importantly, Newsom’s order does not, in itself, give renters any additional protections.

That leaves local governments to write their own regulations.

On Wednesday, Santa Rosa Mayor Tom Schwedhelm and Petaluma Mayor Teresa Barrett, the mayors of the county’s two largest cities, both told the Bohemian that they are considering the issue. Gorin did not immediately return a request for comment on Thursday.

“We are working toward an eviction protection action—most likely an ordinance—with others,” Barrett said, of Petaluma’s efforts. “I believe support for this kind of support is wide and deep throughout our community, this county and our entire state. I hope that is so nationwide.”

Meanwhile, in a Tuesday, March 17 letter to local elected officials throughout Sonoma, Napa, Mendocino and Lake counties, Carol Lexa, the president of the North Bay Association of Realtors, highlighted the concerns of landlords.

“Please find ways to help owners avoid foreclosure and renters to pay rent,” the letter to elected officials states, in part. “As calls for eviction bans proliferate, we implore you to consider the chain reaction results when rent goes unpaid.”

“We call upon local governments to only impose bans on evictions if accompanied by assistance for mortgage/foreclosure relief. It also should be clear that moratoriums are only temporary delays on payments,” the letter continues.

NBAR’s letter does not directly state that the group’s members will not attempt to evict tenants, but does say that “no one should have to worry about keeping a roof over their head during this time.”

After reading the letter, Ronit Rubinoff, executive director of Legal Aid of Sonoma County, a nonprofit which offers legal assistance to Sonoma County residents, pushed back on NBAR’s comparison of the challenges faced by landlords and their tenants.

“We certainly fully support measures to provide mortgage and foreclosure assistance, along with any measures to provide rental assistance,” Rubinoff said. “However, the playing field is not equal between tenants and apartment owners. Low-wage workers who suddenly lose their jobs are much more vulnerable than corporations that own multiple properties, for example.”

Rubinoff suggested that possible eviction moratoriums could differentiate between landlords who own one or two properties and companies that own a large number of rental properties.

“Most tenants do not rent from ‘mom and pops,’” Rubinoff said.

NBAR did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday.

Legal Limbo

While elected officials work on policy solutions, Sonoma County renters may find a small amount of comfort in the fact that the standard legal process for evictions is, in effect, temporarily on hold.

On Monday, March 16, the Sonoma County Superior Court announced its decision to halt most trials and proceedings for the next 60 days.

According to a statement announcing the closure, the court will continue to process a few types of legal filings, but not the core filings in eviction proceedings.

As a result, eviction proceedings—and many other cases—are “in stasis” for the time being, Rubinoff says.

In normal times, if an eviction case is decided in the favor of a landlord, the court ultimately dispatches the Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office to enforce the order. Currently, that won’t happen either.

On Tuesday evening, a representative of the Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office told the Press Democrat that the agency will not enforce evictions for at least the next three weeks, while the county’s shelter-in-place order is in effect.

Still, that doesn’t solve all of the problems for Sonoma County tenants with lost wages and mounting bills. Without local guidance, the court could develop a massive backlog of eviction cases that will go into effect once the court opens again, Rubinoff says.

Additionally, if local governments do pass eviction protections which delay payment until the end of the crisis, tenants could be left paying multiple months of rent once life returns to normal. Without meaningful direct aid payments from the state or federal governments, that could leave thousands of tenants in a significant amount of debt, potentially unable to pay their rent and in threat of eviction once again.

It’s just one of the many problems that local lawmakers are scrambling to deal with in the early days of the coronavirus pandemic.

“Without financial aid from the feds and the state, I don’t know how the cities and county will survive,” Barrett, Petaluma’s mayor, said in an email Wednesday. “It makes me grateful that [former California Governor] Jerry Brown insisted on saving those surpluses for a rainy day. It looks like it’s going to pour.”

Virtual Events Spread During North Bay Shelter-in-Place

Public gatherings continue to be cancelled and postponed with the current Shelter-in-Place orders covering Sonoma, Marin and Napa County. In the face of ongoing social distancing, many venues, artists and organizations are starting to bring their events into your home with online gatherings.

The Alexander Valley Film Society is sheltering in place with movies, and welcomes the public to sit in on a special remote viewing party. First, AV Film Society encourages cinephiles to go to Amazon Prime and watch the 2015 dramedy “The Week,” about a washed-up television host who spends seven days boozing and self-reflecting after his wife leaves him on the eve of their 10-year anniversary.

“The Week” was filmed at multiple locations in and throughout Sonoma County, including Cloverdale’s historic Owl Cafe and Healdsburg’s Passalacqua Winery. It also won the 2015 Sonoma International Film Festival Audience Award.

On Sunday, March 22, AV Film Society Executive Director Kathryn Hecht hosts an online Q&A with Rick Gomez, writer and star of “The Week,”  and Jenny Gomez, who produced the film. Watch the movie first and register for the online discussion here.

In Petaluma, the Rivertown Poets have long held a monthly “A-Muse-ing Mondays” poetry reading and open mic at Aqus Cafe. Now the poetry goes online with Rivertown’s first ever Virtual Poetry Reading and Open Mic. Mark your calendars for Monday, March 23rd, at 6:15 pm. Those who wish to read their three-minute-or-less poem can do so over the stream, and others can sit back and enjoy from the comfort of their own home.

Live music venues were one of the first public spaces to close in the wake of coronavirus concerns, and it looks like live concerts won’t be coming back to the North Bay for a couple weeks. For music lovers who need to scratch that live experience itch, longtime Cotati institution Redwood Café, which live streams all of its concerts, is re-broadcasting “The Best of The Redwood Cafe Live” with special streaming events each evening. Visit the venue online to see the shows each night, or simply browse the video archive on Redwood Cafe’s Facebook page.

The Museum of Sonoma County is currently closed to support the local efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19. Yet, the museum boasts an online database of its permanent collection of historical objects and artwork that is searchable by subject and topic. There’s also a lot of YouTube videos on the museum’s website exploring recent exhibits like the “From Suffrage to #MeToo: Groundbreaking Women in Sonoma County.” Finally, the kids (and adults) will enjoy the museum’s “Color Me Sonoma” downloadable coloring book featuring iconic Sonoma County sites and fun local history.

Podcast: Shelter-in-Place

[embed-1]

Within days of six Bay Area counties issuing “shelter-in-place” orders in response to the spread of the Coronavirus, Sonoma and Napa Counties have followed suit. Editor Daedalus Howell speaks with North Bay Bohemian news reporter Will Carruthers about the implications for residents of the North Bay and what the mandate means to everyone from renters, landlords and the homeless.

Napa County Issues Shelter-At-Home Order

Napa is the latest California county to order residents to restrict their non-essential movements for the next three weeks in an effort to reduce the spread of the Coronavirus.

“One proven way to slow the transmission is to limit interactions among people to the greatest extent practicable. By reducing the spread of the COVID-19 virus, this Order helps preserve critical and limited healthcare capacity in Napa County,” a Nixle alert issued by the Napa County Office of Emergency Management on Wednesday afternoon states.

Unless amended, the order will be in effect between 12:00 AM on March 20, 2020 until 11:59pm on April 7, 2020.

The full order is available here.

Where California Stands with Coronavirus Testing Right Now

0
By Rachel Becker and Ana B. Ibarra, CalMatters

Coronavirus testing has been plagued by confusion, delays and chaos, with the number of available, usable tests far outstripped by the need.

The situation, healthcare providers and experts say, has impaired their ability to know how many people have the virus—but a significantly larger number, they suspect, than that confirmed by state and federal officials.

Gov. Gavin Newsom says, however, that help is on the way, from university medical centers, private labs, the tech sector and more.

So where are we on this? Who can get tested and where exactly should you go? If you do get a hold of a test, is it going to cost anything? Here’s what you need to know.

How many tests does Calif. have?

On Sunday, Newsom said California has conducted 8,316 tests, and has the capacity to run just short of 9,000 more. On Monday evening, he said that the state’s 19 public health labs have increased tests “by a few hundred” over the previous 24 hours. Still, he said, “That clearly is not enough.”

By Tuesday, the number of public health labs conducting testing had increased to 21. And the state has also turned to academic medical centers as well as private companies to fill in those gaps. UC San Francisco, UC Los Angeles, UC San Diego, and Stanford University are all offering tests for the novel coronavirus—and UC Davis is currently racing to get three different types of tests online.

Nam Tran, associate professor and senior director of clinical pathology at UC Davis, said one of the tests that runs on an SUV-sized instrument created by Roche Diagnostics should come online within weeks and is expected to churn out 1400 results per day.

He called it a “game changer.”

As for private firms, Quest Diagnostics has been running 1,200 tests a day out of its lab in San Juan Capistrano, Newsom said Monday—and could ramp up to 10,000 tests per day across the country with the addition of another laboratory by the end of this week.

Should I get tested?

Californians are still facing delays, or no tests at all. And a surge of demand for testing supplies—including swabs, kits for extracting the virus’s genetic material, and personal protective equipment for healthcare workers—threatens efforts to scale up tests.

At a time of limited resources, testing should be reserved for people with moderate to severe symptoms and for those with underlying health conditions, said Michael Romero, a program manager with Placer County’s public health emergency preparedness team.

Symptoms can show up between two days and two weeks after exposure to the virus, and include fever, cough, and trouble breathing, according to the CDC.

“Our guidance is if you have mild symptoms, just stay home, testing would help you know whether you have it or not, but it wouldn’t change anything,” because there is currently no treatment, he said.

Can I get tested?

One challenge is the patchwork of guidance about whom to test first across California’s counties, private testing companies, and health systems, according to Kat DeBurgh, executive director of the Health Officers Association of California.

Guidelines may vary by county because of the uneven spread of the coronavirus, and local public health departments are required to approve the tests run through their labs, DeBurgh said.

She’s calling for more guidance from the state about whom to prioritize, she said, to help with the crush of calls that local public health officers are triaging.

In Los Angeles, for instance, the public health lab “will test specimens from high risk patients requiring a rapid public health response if they test positive,” according to guidance from the county. Any other patients with fever and symptoms of a respiratory illness who may have been exposed should be tested by a commercial lab instead.

At Kaiser Permanente, clinicians decide who to test, spokesman Marc Brown told CalMatters in an email.

Tests are only available to Kaiser members with a doctor’s order.Priority goes to hospitalized patients as well as people with symptoms who also have additional risk factors such as being over 60, heart or lung disease, or being immunocompromised. Anyone exposed to someone with a confirmed or suspected case of the virus, or who recently traveled somewhere affected by it, will also be prioritized.

Where can I get tested?

People should first check with their doctor to ask whether they’re collecting specimens, said Romero with Placer County. If their doctor is not doing testing, they can try calling their local urgent care. Romero said people should not go to the emergency department just for testing. That is what would cause unnecessary over-flooding in the ER, he said.

Some counties, such as Los Angeles and San Diego, ask that people who do not have a primary care provider call the county’s 2-1-1 line for information on where they can find providers with tests. Sutter Health, for example, asks that its patients schedule a video visit with a doctor to check whether they meet testing criteria. If they do, then doctors make arrangements with patients about specific locations where they can go for testing.

Some health systems have also opened drive-through testing for its members.

Are tests free? What if I’m uninsured?

Earlier this month, Newsom announced that all screening and testing fees would be waived for about 24 million Californians. That includes co-pays and deductibles for a hospital and doctor office visit associated with the test. But if a person is sick and needs further treatment and care, that cost is not required to be waived.

Newsom’s order does not apply to people who work for large employers and whose private health plans are regulated by the federal government. That said, an emergency coronavirus response bill pending in Congress would require that testing and all related fees be covered by all forms of insurance without out-of-pocket costs for the patient.

The California Department of Public Health has said that people who are uninsured and have symptoms should contact their county for information on how to get tested.

Some health clinics, like the AltaMed group in Southern California, are waiving test fees even for patients who are uninsured, but again, tests are only given to people who are showing symptoms. Also, clinics can help enroll patients in any available county program that may cover fees, and clinics themselves often charge on a sliding scale, which means costs are based on a person’s ability to pay.

Testing through the Verily screening pilot program screening in Santa Clara and San Mateo counties is a philanthropic effort and also free to the public.

What’s the deal with Verily’s triage?

Confusion has dogged the rollout of a triage site aimed at directing concerned Californians to testing. At first, President Donald Trump said Friday that “Google has 1,700 engineers working” on a screening website that would be “very quickly done.”

In fact, it was Verily, the life sciences subsidiary of Google’s parent company Alphabet, behind the effort, and the site was not a nationwide screening tool but one specifically for Californians in the Bay Area. Newsom announced the triage website on Sunday, where people can fill out a questionnaire and schedule an appointment at one of two test sites in Santa Clara and San Mateo.

So far, demand outstrips availability: 174,000 people visited the website in the first day since it opened, Newsom said Monday. 174 people filled out the questionnaire. Fifty people signed up for specific appointments—and 30 people actually showed up. Newsom said he expects testing to grow by 200 to 400 tests per site, and in a press briefing on Tuesday, he projected the Verily mobile test sites had conducted 320 tests that day.

Newsom said the whole idea is to expand these mobile test sites beyond the Bay Area. “The good news is operationally, things went fairly well, not perfectly, but fairly well.”

What will this test actually tell me?

The current test for the novel coronavirus looks for the virus itself by sniffing out the virus’s genetic code. These tests can tell you if you have an active infection. What they can not tell you is whether you’ve been infected and recovered.“

Something that is missing from our knowledge of this virus is how many people are exposed to it,” said Philip Felgner, director of the vaccine research and development center at the UC Irvine School of Medicine. That data is key for understanding the breadth of the outbreak, and just how lethal it really is.

How can we track the virus?

Researchers across the world are working on developing another kind of test—one that looks for signs of the immune response to the virus, called antibodies. This kind of test—a serological test—would allow scientists to search out people who have recovered from less severe or asymptomatic cases of the virus who never ended up in a hospital.

That could help scientists identify chains of viral transmission, home in on hotspots of the outbreak, and would be a first step towards a fuller understanding of why some people recover more readily than others. STAT has reported that the CDC is working on developing two of these tests, and Science has reported that scientists in Singapore used a serological test to track the outbreak.

Here in California, Felgner at UC Irvine has teamed up with a company called SinoBiological to create tests that can hunt for antibodies to nine different infectious agents including other coronaviruses like ones that cause SARS and MERS, as well as viruses that lead to similar symptoms, like influenza.

Felgner and a research institute in San Francisco called Vitalant intend to validate these tests and other, similar ones, by running them with leftover samples of donated blood from Seattle. Another test will look for the kinds of antibodies that can neutralize infections, giving a sense for how effective the immune response actually is.

Michael Busch, director of the Vitalant Research Institute, clarifies that these tests aren’t to screen the blood.

“We don’t screen blood purposefully for this virus, it’s not a transfusion transmissible agent,” Busch said.

The goal, instead, is to survey communities to find out just how far the virus spreads, and for how long.

“What it does show you is how many people were infected,” Busch said. That changes the calculus for what we understand about how often the virus causes severe symptoms, or kills people—and where exactly to be looking for it.

CalMatters.org is a nonpartisan media venture explaining policies and politics.

BottleRock Napa Valley Postponed to October

In a move that comes as little surprise given the North Bay “shelter-in-place” orders, the organizers of BottleRock Napa Valley have rescheduled the three-day music festival from May 22–24 to October 2–4, 2020.

The festival released a statement announcing the postponement in the interest of public safety and health in the face of a spreading coronavirus pandemic.

Fortunately for music fans, the festival also announced that all headlining acts, including Stevie Nicks, Dave Matthews Band, Red Hot Chili Peppers and others, are already confirmed for the new dates, and all passes to the sold-out fest will be honored in October. Read the full statement below:

BottleRock Napa Valley has been rescheduled for the weekend of October 2nd – 4th, 2020 at the Napa Valley Expo, after careful consideration and in coordination with our local and state authorities.

We made this decision with the safety and best interests of our fans, musicians, partners, employees, and community being paramount. We are committed to putting on the festival to not only share great music and the incredible Napa Valley hospitality, but because it’s vitally important to the livelihood of all those who make BottleRock Napa Valley the festival it is.

It is with great pleasure we can announce that all our headliners, including Red Hot Chili Peppers, Stevie Nicks, Dave Matthews Band, Miley Cyrus, Khalid, Anderson .Paak & The Free Nationals, Zedd and more are confirmed for the rescheduled dates. Additional lineup updates will be announced as soon as possible.

All passes will be valid for the new October 2nd – 4th, 2020 dates.

We will be emailing tickets holders within the next few weeks with more details about exchanges and returns.

Thank you for your patience and understanding, and we look forward to seeing you in early October.

With love from the entire BottleRock Napa Valley Family.

Sonoma County Issues “Shelter-In-Place” Order

One day after six Bay Area counties issued “shelter-in-place” orders in response to the spread of the Coronavirus, Sonoma County has followed suit.

Sonoma County’s order, issued by the county’s interim Health Officer Dr. Sundari Mase, goes into effect at midnight.

The following text comes from a county press release:

The Sonoma County Health Officer has issued a Health Order directing residents to shelter in place effective at midnight (12:00am) on Wednesday March 18, 2020. This Health Order will be in place for three weeks until April 7, 2020. The Health Order limits activity, travel and business functions to only the most basic and essential needs.



This recent Order comes after the County received two additional cases of local transmission from coronavirus (COVID-19) yesterday, and two cases over the past weekend.



All individuals currently living within the County are ordered to shelter at their homes. To the extent individuals are using shared or outdoor spaces, they must at all times as reasonably possible maintain social distancing of at least six feet from any other person when they are outside their residence.



The guidance comes after substantial input from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), and from international health experts.



Social distancing is scientifically-proven to be one of the most effective methods to slow the transmission of communicable disease, such as COVID-19.



“In light of the recent cases of local transmission of COVID-19 in the County, we are taking proactive action to curtail the spread of the virus,” said Dr. Sundari Mase, Sonoma County Interim Health Officer.



“We urge our residents not to panic, however, please take this Order seriously, as COVID-19 is a real threat to our community at this time. Please adhere to the social distancing of six feet from another person as well as continue to maintain good hygiene practices.”

Please Remember

  • Keep a distance of at least six feet away from another person
  • Wash hands with soap and water for at least 20 seconds
  • Refrain from touching your face
  • Use hand sanitizer
  • Covering coughs or sneezes (into the sleeve or elbow, not hands)
  • Regularly cleaning high-touch surfaces, and not shaking hands.
This Order was issued in response to the six cases of COVID-19 in the County, as well as at least 258 confirmed cases and at least three deaths in the seven Bay Area jurisdictions who also jointly issued similar health orders yesterday.



This also comes in response to the significant and increasing number of suspected cases of community transmission and likely further significant increases in transmission. The order defines essential activities as necessary for the health and safety for individuals and their families.



Essential businesses are those that provide food, shelter, social services and homeless services, and other necessities of life for economically disadvantaged or otherwise needy individuals; fresh and non-perishable food retailers (including convenience stores); pharmacies; child care facilities; gas stations; banks; laundry businesses and services necessary for maintaining the safety, sanitation and essential operation of a residence.



Health care operations are also essential businesses and include hospitals, long-term care facilities, clinics, dentists, pharmacies, licensed cannabis businesses, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, other healthcare facilities, healthcare suppliers, home health care services providers, mental health providers, or any related and/or ancillary health care services.



Health care operations also includes veterinary care and all health care services provided to animals. This does not include fitness and exercise gyms and similar facilities. Licensed cannabis retail facilities/dispensaries shall operate only for the purpose of providing medical cannabis, and only via curbside pickup or delivery.



Essential businesses also include: agriculture, food, and beverage cultivation, processing, and distribution, including but not limited to, farming, ranching, fishing, dairies, creameries, wineries and breweries in order to preserve inventory and production (not for retail business);



In addition, health care, law and safety, and essential government functions will continue under the recommended action.



Campgrounds, hotels and motels are considered shelters and therefore an essential service and will remain open.



The goal is to limit groups congregating together in a way that could further spread the coronavirus.



This Order comes days after Governor Gavin Newsom ordered adults, age 65 and older, to remain at home.



The violation of any provision of this Order constitutes an imminent threat to public health and will be enforced by law enforcement.



The Health Officer will continue to assess the quickly evolving situation and may modify or extend this Order, or issue additional Orders, related to COVID-19.



For the latest information about the coronavirus in Sonoma County and advice from health experts on prevention and care, visit www.socoemergency.org, call 2-1-1, or text your zip code to 898-211. Updates and videos are also on the County of Sonoma Facebook page and Twitter feed @countyofsonoma.

 

Stay Home

News breaks quickly these days.

Over the weekend, Sonoma County officials announced two cases of “community transmitted” Coronavirus, adding to two previous cases residents acquired while traveling outside of the county. On Monday, the county announced two more cases, bringing the total number to six.

In an address on Sunday afternoon, Gov. Gavin Newsom strongly recommended that all bars, wine tasting rooms, nightclubs and breweries in the state close for the coming weeks. Additionally, Californians older than 65 and those with preexisting conditions—the demographics most vulnerable to COVID-19—should isolate themselves at home, Newsom said.

On Monday, six Bay Area counties, not including Sonoma County, issued a “shelter-in-place” order, effective until at least Monday, April 7. As of Tuesday morning, Sonoma County officials had not issued a similar order, but were strongly considering doing so.

The spread of the virus and related business closures are revealing deep, often unexamined economic inequalities in the country. So far, it’s not clear whether government efforts to patch the holes will be anywhere near adequate.

In the North Bay, where the economy is largely based on tourism, entertainment and food services, the impacts are growing, with business owners and their employees facing significant costs.

In an effort to mitigate one of the expected impacts of lost wages, activists around the state are pushing local governments to implement protections for renters and workers.

San Francisco implemented a temporary moratorium on evictions on Friday, March 13, and lawmakers are considering similar legislation at the state level. (The San Francisco legislation specifies that rent payments are delayed until the end of the crisis, not forgiven.) Multiple Sonoma County activist groups have asked local governments to a similar step but, so far, they have not.

In a letter sent to elected officials throughout Sonoma County on Saturday, March 14, the North Bay Organizing Project requested that local governments implement “a moratorium on all evictions for the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak; allocate rental assistance for those who will be most impacted economically by this virus; provide emergency shelter to our homeless population a disproportionate number of whom are immunocompromised.”

On Monday, the Sonoma Valley Housing Group sent a similar request for a temporary ban on evictions to local elected officials.

At a press conference on Sunday, hours before Newsom asked bars throughout the state to close, Sonoma County Board of Supervisors Chair Susan Gorin acknowledged that she and other elected officials have received requests for a temporary halt of evictions related to COVID-19 in the county, but indicated that the county may wait for the state to take action.

“The first step is really evaluating what is happening from a public health perspective and then evaluating how the impact will be felt throughout all of our community,” Gorin said Sunday, noting that Newsom had been asked to take similar action at the state level.

On Monday, Newsom passed the issue back to local governments. He signed an executive order which, according to a press release, “authorizes local governments to halt evictions for renters and homeowners, slows foreclosures, and protects against utility shutoffs for Californians affected by COVID-19.”

Crucially, the order does not require local jurisdictions to halt evictions and mortgage payments. The order also “does not relieve a tenant from the obligation to pay rent,” according to the press release. Instead, if a local government does pass a temporary ban on evictions of their own, rent payments will likely be delayed until after the crisis, not permanently forgiven.

Research shows that even the threat of eviction causes negative mental and physical health impacts.

Furthermore, if evicted, families and workers could wind up living on the street, adding to the state’s already-large population of shelterless people.

Cannabis Crackdown

On March 9, Sonoma County pushed out an email request for qualifications that may strike fear into the hearts of local pot growers still attempting to skirt government regulations in this era of legalized—and increasingly corporatized—cannabis.

Here’s the full announcement:

“The County of Sonoma is seeking to identify a Satellite Imagery Contract so the Code Enforcement Division at Permit Sonoma will be able to identify black market cannabis grows at a much quicker rate. Officers will then be able to drive directly to identified properties and post a notice and order without having to catch growers off guard. This will drastically improve officer safety and expedite field operations,” the announcement states.

A little internet sleuthing reveals an ongoing debate about the legality and ethics of similar eye-in-the-sky programs farther north.

A few days before Sonoma County started seeking a contractor, Humboldt County’s Environmental Impact Reduction Program received an award from the California State Association of Counties (CSAC).

“Now instead of sending staff into the depths of the 4,000-square-mile county to come across grows that are not in compliance, all it takes is a click of the mouse to review current satellite footage,” a CSAC press release praising Humboldt’s “state-of-the-art” enforcement program pronounces.

In the same press release, Scott Greacen, executive director of Friends of the Eel River, praises the program, noting that un-registered growers who have flocked to the region since legalization often use pesticides, illegally trim trees and cause numerous other environmental impacts.

Critics of Humboldt’s program highlight other factors at play.

In a letter to elected officials shared on the Redheaded Blackbelt, a popular news site covering the Emerald Triangle, cannabis attorney Eugene “ED” Denson raised some concerns about the program, including invasion of privacy and “extortion” of landowners identified by the satellite imagery.

According to Denson, several code enforcement actions based on information gathered from the county’s “eye-in-the-sky” program are currently being litigated in the Humboldt County Superior Court.

“The program has been a civil rights disaster, and a taste of what life under Big Brother can become,” Denson warns in his letter.

Soon enough, a similar conversation may take place in Sonoma County.


Drain the Pain

Bear with me, Dear Reader, while I tell my CBD story. I was in pain and found it uncomfortable to sit, stand or just move. Usually, when severe pain strikes, I pop pills and apply ice and heat. But a package from Jessica Bernardo at Canna Bath Co. (cannabathco.com) arrived in the mail. I knew it...

Going Dark

Running a theater company anywhere is never easy—but running one in the North Bay has been even more challenging than usual for the past few years. Many companies rely on the ticket sales from one show to finance the next one, so the loss of even a single performance can have significant consequences on a company's...

Local Cities Consider Eviction Protections

As activists across the state continue to call for a temporary moratorium on evictions caused by lost wages due to the coronavirus pandemic, elected officials in Sonoma County are beginning to tackle the...

Virtual Events Spread During North Bay Shelter-in-Place

Films, poetry readings, concerts and more go online.

Podcast: Shelter-in-Place

Within days of six Bay Area counties issuing "shelter-in-place" orders in response to the spread of the Coronavirus, Sonoma and Napa Counties have followed suit.

Napa County Issues Shelter-At-Home Order

Napa is the latest California county to order residents to restrict their non-essential movements for the next three weeks in an effort to reduce the spread of the Coronavirus. "One proven way to slow the transmission is to limit interactions among people to the greatest extent practicable. By reducing the spread of the COVID-19 virus, this Order helps preserve critical...

Where California Stands with Coronavirus Testing Right Now

By Rachel Becker and Ana B. Ibarra, CalMatters Coronavirus testing has been plagued by confusion, delays and chaos, with the number of available,...

BottleRock Napa Valley Postponed to October

Headliners confirmed for new dates, festival passes will be honored

Sonoma County Issues “Shelter-In-Place” Order

One day after six Bay Area counties issued "shelter-in-place" orders in response to the spread of the Coronavirus, Sonoma County has followed suit. Sonoma County's order, issued by the county's interim Health Officer Dr. Sundari Mase, goes into effect at midnight. The following text comes from a county press release: ...

Stay Home

News breaks quickly these days. Over the weekend, Sonoma County officials announced two cases of “community transmitted” Coronavirus, adding to two previous cases residents acquired while traveling outside of the county. On Monday, the county announced two more cases, bringing the total number to six. ...
11,084FansLike
4,606FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow