Absinthe

0

Painting by Edgar Degas

Liquid Dreams

Chasing Baudelaire, Oscar Wilde, and other dead devotees in Barcelona’s bohemian barrio

By Taras Grescoe

IT DROVE BAUDELAIRE to Belgium, then to an early grave; it left Paul Verlaine a hollow-eyed wreck, wandering from bar to bar in Paris’ Latin Quarter accompanied by a misshapen shoeshine boy named Bibi-la-Purée. The deaths of Vincent Van Gogh, Oscar Wilde, and poet Alfred de Musset were hastened by their inordinate love for this poison, long since banned by the thinking men of all civilized nations.

Except, of course, in death-defying, devil-may-care Spain, where 136-proof absinthe is about as common as orange Fanta.

I’d come to Europe determined to uncork the liquid muse of the avant garde, the licorice-flavored, high-octane herbal alcohol popularized by a French doctor in 1792. I’d discovered that in the nation of his birth, absinthe’s sale had been strictly prohibited since World War I, but that in Spain, absinthe is considered just another aperitif, as familiar as vermouth and Campari. I’d found what the Spanish call Absenta in liquor stores in Madrid and in just about every bar in Catalonia; hell, I’d even found liter bottles of the stuff in the window of Can Canesa, the great grilled-sandwich shop in Barcelona’s Plaça Sant Jaume.

And now I was in Barcelona’s Barrio Chino–the infamous warren of narrow streets where Jean Genet set A Thief’s Journal and the Divine Dalí went slumming–finally face to face with my own glass of La Fée Verte, the 19th-century hallucinogen that, in its time, had ruined more lives than cocaine.

To tell the truth, I had been a little worried about my date with the Green Fairy. Before my trip, the only two people I’d met who’d actually tried absinthe–both mild-mannered Canadians–had gotten into fistfights after only a couple of glasses of the stuff. With this in mind, I’d chosen my drinking companions carefully: Mary, a Scottish painter who’d fallen in love with Barcelona in the ’80s and stayed on through the booming ’90s; and Henri, a gaunt Belgian pastrymaker with the sideburns of a rockabilly singer from Memphis. He’d left Ghent only two days before, using a Renault truck to transport 55-pound blocks of chocolate across France at a top speed of about 45 miles per hour, to fulfill his longtime dream of becoming the first trufflemaker for the sugar-loving citizens of Barcelona.

As drinking partners, Mary and Henri may not have been Sarah Bernhardt and Arthur Rimbaud, but they had forged their friendship over countless glasses of absinthe and knew its rituals. What’s more, under their tutelage, I was pretty sure that I wouldn’t finish the night in jail.

We had started the evening at midnight (this being Spain, after all) in the Bar Marsella, which, though recently purchased by two hefty Anglo-Saxons, has been preserved intact as a kind of monument to the fast-fading bohemia of the Barrio Chino. In the Marsella, yellowing posters for long-forgotten aperitifs curl on the walls, the paint peels suggestively, and half a dozen different tile patterns jockey for space on the undulating floor.

A young waiter had brought us small brandy glasses full of clear, oily-looking absinthe, along with all the attendant paraphernalia: a bottle of water, paper-wrapped lumps of sugar, and a three-tined trowel. In the classic version, one sets the trowel on the rim of the glass and slowly strains the water through the sugar cube into the absinthe until it dissolves. (Water wasn’t the only mixer for absinthe, however: singer Aristide Bruant drank it with red wine, and Edgar Allan Poe took his with brandy–and died, incidentally, at the age of 40 of a heart attack after a prolonged drinking binge.)

Mary introduces me to a local variation: I allow a sugar cube, squeezed between forefinger and thumb, to soak up the absinthe, which is 68 percent alcohol. Then, placing the cube on the trowel, I light it on fire until the alcohol burns off. After stirring the dissolving cube into the absinthe, I fill the glass three-quarters full with water, provoking a remarkable transformation. The liquid turns milky green–a color Oscar Wilde described as opaline, though to my eyes it looks more like a happy marriage of crème de menthe and whipped cream. In the murky half-light of the Bar Marsella, my glass of absinthe appears to be glowing from within.

I PAUSE before imbibing. Everything about absinthe, after all, is sinister. It proved the undoing of so many artists and writers that the best book on the subject–Barnaby Conrad III’s excellent 1995 work, Absinthe: History in a Bottle–eventually starts to read like an obituary page. It’s distilled from the grayish-green leaves of a shrub called wormwood–in Russia, the plant is ominously called chernobyl–and in large doses, its active ingredient, thujone, is a convulsive poison.

Even absinthe’s Greek name, apsinthion, means “undrinkable.” However, it was also one of the most popular aperitifs in fin-de-siècle France, the subject of a painting by Manet, a sculpture by Picasso, and innumerable anecdotes by Hemingway. A favorite among the women at Parisian bars such as the Nouvelle-Athènes and the Café du Rat Mort, absinthe even made it to the New World, where Mark Twain and Walt Whitman drank it in New Orleans’ Old Absinthe House. But the dead-eyed regard of actress Ellen Andrée, the barfly in Degas’ 1876 painting L’Absinthe, had always haunted me, and the more I look, the more the small groups huddled conspiratorially around the other tables at the Marsella resemble the doomed characters out of Emile Zola’s L’Assomoir.”

I imagine myself embarking on a long slide into debauchery, followed by months of hydrotherapy–a belle époque cure for alcoholics, which consisted of purges and a half-hourly soaking with cold water–in some Gothic asylum.

Suppressing a sensation of vertigo, I drink. And then I smile. Not at all bad–reminiscent of pastis, the licorice-flavored French aperitif, but with a slightly bitter undertone. Loosening up, I start trading anecdotes with my drinking companions about our worst debauches. The Belgian wins hands down–naturally–with his sad saga of three bottles of red wine, abrupt eviction from the restaurant where he’d consumed them, and his subsequent awakening to a curious sound: the slick hiss of car tires whipping past his ear in the gutter he’d chosen for his bed. Mary looks at the rapidly dwindling level of my glass and says with some concern: “You might want to slow down. This is brain-damage stuff.”

I, however, am eager to test Wilde’s description of absinthe’s effects: “After the first glass, you see things as you wish they were. After the second glass, you see things as they are not. Finally you see things as they really are, and that is the most horrible thing in the world.”

In fact, as I finish my glass, the Bar Marsella is suddenly looking like the most wonderful place on God’s earth. When I walked in, I had been pretty sure that I was surrounded by nothing more than particularly hip backpackers, but suddenly the people at the next table begin to look strangely fascinating. They must be artists, I think to myself. And, as I work on another glass, the second phase of Wilde’s dictum begins to kick in: I start to see things as they aren’t. Isn’t that woman–the one with her arm around the red-headed guy with the goatee–staring at me through her half-lidded eyes?

My eyes, too, are playing tricks on me: When I focus on an ashtray or a beer spigot, the center of my field of vision becomes unusually clear, but the periphery looks watery, indistinct. Objects seem to be surrounded by yellowish haloes, as in a Van Gogh painting (the Dutch artist was on an absinthe bender for much of his career, including the binge in which he ran at Paul Gauguin with a razor and then cut off the tip of his own ear).

The overall effect is of wearing a pair of ill-fitting goggles in the bottom of a filthy–but surprisingly comfortable–aquarium.

However, remembering my Canadian friends’ warning about absinthe’s tendency to lead to fistfights–and noticing that the woman at the next table has somehow vaporized–I instead suggest to Mary and Henri that we take our custom elsewhere.

HENRI BEGS OFF, the combined effects of hard liquor and two days of driving with the French having taken their toll, but Mary and I continue our crawl through the Barrio Chino. Most of the rest of the madrugada (not surprisingly, the Spanish have a single word for the early hours of the morning) is a blur. We wander past the Franco-era prostitutes of Carrer d’en Robador, anarchist cafes, and the inevitable piles of street-corner refuse giving off fascinating, unidentifiable odors.

We stop at a nightclub called El Cangrejo, where a transvestite of the stature of the late Divine is performing beneath a sheep dog-sized wig. We poke our heads into the Bar Pastís, a temple of francophilia where the jukebox has been playing Edith Piaf since the ’40s; the London Bar, where people come to worship swinging England; and finally the Bar Kentucky, which is what an American tavern might look like if Antonio Gaudí was hired as a decorator. A barman who calls himself Pinocchio–he explains his sobriquet with a gesture to his bent nose–serves us our last absinthes of the night, and Mary and I ferry our drinks to the end of the mobile home-length bar.

As taxi drivers and prostitutes squeeze past us, we clink glasses, toasting what’s left of Barcelona’s rapidly gentrifying Barrio Chino. On this night, I won’t make it to Wilde’s ultimate phase of absinthism (it would take at least five more glasses), the one in which one’s surroundings reveal themselves in all their horror. In the Kentucky, on the contrary, the seediness continues to look glamorous.

I remember all those who had succumbed to the allure of the Green Fairy: among them, Toulouse-Lautrec, who carried absinthe around Montmartre cabarets in a hollow cane; and Alfred Jarry, the playwright who dyed his face and hands green, toted pistols on his absinthe binges, and died at the age of 34. With the opaline, nerve-damaging muse in hand, I drink to squandered talent and beautiful corpses.

But I’m really drinking to danger–and to the grateful realization that, in this world in which people are increasingly protected from themselves, there are still places left where we are free to choose our own poison.

Taras Grescoe has written for numerous publications, including ‘Wired,’ ‘Islands,’ ‘Saveur,’ the ‘Independent,’ and the ‘Times’ of London.

He lives in Montreal. This article first appeared on Salon.com.

From the June 14-20, 2001 issue of the Northern California Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

‘Keep the River on Your Right: A Modern Cannibal Tale’

On Exhibit

‘River’ treats Tobias Schneebaum like the Wild Man of Borneo

By

THE NEW documentary Keep the River on Your Right: A Modern Cannibal Tale is an engrossing visit to three continents, with journeys to the rainy capital of a New Guinean province, the jungles beyond Machu Picchu, and Coney Island.

But the film’s subtitle gives away the movie’s troublesome tone. Tobias Schneebaum, the former rabbinical student turned artist/writer who lived with indigenous peoples of the remotest parts of the world in the 1950s, is exhibited as if he were the Wild Man of Borneo.

Directors David Shapiro and Laurie Gwen Shapiro take the protesting Schneebaum, now 80, back to the places he explored almost 50 years ago. Meanwhile, they’re also teasing out of him the true story of how he ate human flesh in Peru, during his time with a tribe he called the Amarekaire (actually the Harakambut).

During Schneebaum’s visit in the 1950s, these people attacked a rival village and slaughtered the men, ritually devouring the victims. Schneebaum, who witnessed the attack, says he took a bite with his hosts. We see the cannibals as they are today; quite reformed and obviously depressed about it.

It’s also touching when Schneebaum revisits New Guinea to meet an old lover from a tribe he lived with in the Asmat, the New Guinea interior–a tribe that, to Schneebaum’s still tangible surprise, existed without homosexual taboos. The Shapiros don’t underscore the self-loathing quality of gay life in the 1950s. In those days, even the group most sympathetic to homosexuals–psychiatrists–considered gayness a disease. Schneebaum’s dreadful risk at seeking out remote tribes would have been eased by a gay man’s feelings of being doomed anyway.

By the time Schneebaum had published the book of his Peruvian adventure, also titled Keep the River on Your Right, being a sinner had a certain cachet. We see Schneebaum on the chat-show circuit circa 1970 having the cannibal story eked out of him. Footage of talk-show hosts Mike Douglas and Charlie Rose shows us a younger, slightly cocky Schneebaum tolerating a pair of real squares: the hard-charging Rose assures his viewers that he’s taking a no-tolerance stand on cannibalism.

The Shapiros pry one last account of the incident out of Schneebaum, who is obviously sick of talking about it. They bill their documentary as “A Modern Cannibal Tale,” but this meek old man is no Dr. Lecter. Still, I understand why they tried to make the film flamboyant. Schneebaum is a man of few words, and when he’s visiting his old haunts he tends to go completely silent.

Schneebaum seems to have second thoughts about having spread the cannibal tale; the slight bravado he’d shown on the chat shows (“It tastes like pork”) has given way to the piercing regrets that only the aged feel. I couldn’t get over the sense Schneebaum was being exploited. Who’s eating whom here?

‘Keep the River on Your Right’ opens Friday, June 15, at Rialto Cinemas Lakeside, 551 Summerfield Road, Santa Rosa. For details, see , or call 707/525-4840.

From the June 14-20, 2001 issue of the Northern California Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Open Mic

Out of the Box

By Tara Treasurefield

WE’VE HAD ENOUGH. While state officials pose for photo ops, we’re drowning in pesticides. We can’t breathe. Nature is dying. Our pets are dying. Our children are dying. To survive, we must demand freedom from toxic trespass. We have no choice. State regulatory agencies block even modest attempts by local governments to protect us from exposure to pesticides.

In March, Fairfax passed an ordinance that prohibits pesticides from town property and public rights of way. The ordinance also requires residents to give 48-hour notice to neighbors within 150 feet before applying pesticides outdoors. Following the example of Fairfax, Sebastopol later this summer will vote on a similar ordinance. In separate letters, an attorney representing Pest Control Operators of California Inc. and Paul E. Helliker, director of the Department of Pesticide Regulation, warned Fairfax that the new ordinance violates state law. Helliker contends that, as written, the ordinance could be applied to property not owned by Fairfax, and that Fairfax has no right to require advance notice of pesticide spraying on private property. That, he says, amounts to regulating pesticides, which is the DPR’s job. In response, Fairfax has established a legal fund to defend its ordinance in court.

This isn’t just a turf battle. Helliker advocates integrated pest management, or IPM, which promotes nontoxic and least toxic pest control methods first. IPM doesn’t exclude synthetic (chemical) pesticides, even though they disrupt and deplete the natural world. There’s a vast difference between IPM and organic agriculture, which prohibits synthetic pesticides.

Even within IPM guidelines, there’s a decided disconnect between theory and practice at the DPR. A matter-of-fact report on the DPR website mentions that carbaryl is being used in residential areas to protect vineyards. What happened to IPM? There are organic alternatives to carbaryl, which the EPA places in the group of pesticides that pose the greatest risk to the public health. In addition, the DPR reports that it has the tightest restrictions in the United States for methyl bromide, one of the deadliest pesticides of all. That’s great, except that what’s needed is an immediate and complete ban of methyl bromide.

We’re running out of time. Only fundamental change can save us. Although it doesn’t go far enough, the Fairfax ordinance is a step in the right direction. Hurray for Fairfax! As Paul Ray and Sherry Anderson write in their recent book Cultural Creatives, “When you’re trying to change the old culture, . . . you can’t play within the old culture’s mind-set.”

Tara Treasurefield writes about pesticides, energy, the environment, and related issues, and serves on the city of Sonoma’s Toxics Task Force. For info about the Fairfax dispute with the state, see www.safe2use.com.

From the June 14-20, 2001 issue of the Northern California Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Last Day Saloon

0

Music man: Last Day Saloon Santa Rosa owner Dave Daher

New Day Dawns

Last Day Saloon owner sets up second shop in Santa Rosa

By Paula Harris

“WHAT THE HELL IS this for?” bellowed Dave Daher. A Camel Light gripped between his fingers, Daher stabbed at a mysterious gash marring a freshly sheet-rocked wall inside his new nightclub, the Last Day Saloon in Santa Rosa. Then he barked just two words to the group of construction workers cowering in his wake: “Fix it!”

All around the club, dozens of contractors were scrambling to complete their work in a space filled with piles of construction equipment and power cords snaking across the floor.

On that stressful, chaotic day, Daher, 52, a solid guy with a graying beard, grumbled in his gravelly voice that he didn’t know when the new Last Day Saloon would open.

But now, just days later, the place is up and running.

Daher and his crew have totally transformed the space at Fifth and Davis streets that formerly housed Rumors nightclub. There’s a new wooden dance floor, a raised stage for live bands, new walls, a revamped roof, an $80,000 sound system, carpeting, and bathrooms.

The 8,000-square-foot club will also boast a lobby, a restaurant, bars, and a “VIP room” with its own dimmers, sound systems, and fireplace.

In former incarnations the building in Railroad Square has been a variety of clubs, including the Daily Planet, City Limits, the Funhouse, and, most recently, Rumors. But Daher, a 13-year resident of Santa Rosa who lives just six minutes away from his new venture, has been eyeing the building for years and plans to make Last Day last.

“I bought the building. This is a lifetime commitment for me,” he explains. “I will never sell. It will be in my family’s name forever.”

Indeed, longevity is something of a guiding principle for Daher, who has owned and run San Francisco’s Last Day Saloon for 28 years–making it the longest operating single-owner club in Northern California.

Upstairs in his small airless office, Daher pushes aside a half-eaten sandwich and begins dealing with a parade of workers by signing checks and barking out orders. Some recoil, but others, the ones that have known Daher for years, banter and even exchange playful insults.

On the wall, an ad for the latest Madonna concert is pinned up with a message scrawled across it in ballpoint pen: “Dad, please get your daughter tickets–it’s sold out!” That’s probably a task the venerable bar owner can accomplish with no sweat. No stranger to the music biz, Daher has booked some 9,500 bands over the years, including John Lee Hooker, Etta James, and Taj Mahal, plus big-name comedians such as Robin Williams.

“I want to bring a big comedian show up here, and I’m also going to be bringing in acts from throughout the USA, Canada, and Europe,” Daher promises.

Last Day Saloon Santa Rosa will be open seven nights a week and will feature live music on at least four of those, including blues, rock, and funk. In addition, there will be a country music night, a hospitality night for karaoke, hula hoop contests, and waiter races. “Hey, maybe we’ll even play Spin the Bottle,” Daher says with a laugh. “People don’t know how to have fun, and we want to show them on Monday nights, when everything else is closed.”

Daher plans to split his time between his two clubs. “I’m really putting my time in,” he says. “When you create something like this it’s really a big deal, and if you plan on being here a long time and you don’t feel here [he puts a hand on his heart] that you’re doing a good thing, then it’s just too much work.”

From the June 14-20, 2001 issue of the Northern California Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Foodie Father

0

Props for Pops

A foodie in suburbia rules the roost

By Marina Wolf

IT’S ALL MOM’S FAULT. That’s the line you’ll get from almost anyone confessing to a less-than-enlightened culinary background. I’ve heard aspiring chefs volunteer this information like politicians dumping their dirt before anyone else can dig it up. “My mother wasn’t a very good cook,” they say, by way of explaining their desperate climb up the food chain to a more sophisticated cuisine.

But almost invariably they leave out the obvious corollary: Where was Dad?

Oy, a Freudian would have a field day with this setup. Absentee dad, meet domineering mom. Symbolic interpretations notwithstanding, it’s true that in most homes mother traditionally assumes the role of baking the daily bread, while dad mans the grill on federal holidays. But I’d like to take advantage of the imminent Father’s Day festivities to say that my dad is a little different.

We knew the truth before we knew the phrase: he’s a foodie. A foodie in suburbia, but that still means something, maybe even more than being surrounded by other foodies and getting support for one’s tastes. I remember one year how we kids saved a mound of nickels and dimes to get him a cheese-and-sausage sampler box from a mail order catalog. The catalog seemed printed just for him. And to this day, he is the easiest father to shop for. No ties or golf clubs or slipcovers for a La-Z-Boy: just get the man some rare cheese and he’ll enjoy it for hours.

We didn’t know it at the time, but such gifts of special food only add fuel to the fire. By the time I was 11 or 12, my father had positioned himself as the savior, the one man who could rescue my mother from her inevitable kitchen mistakes. His approach was horrible, involving a constant barrage of criticism at her while she stood over the stove. The Like Water for Chocolate school of culinary thought would predict that her trampled spirit and continual embarrassment would somehow seep into her meals, and in fact that slight dullness and limpness is the one constant of all her dishes.

It was, in large part, my father’s doing, difficult to forget, let alone forgive, because he still does it. “Honey, honey, honey!” he’d shout from the door to the kitchen. “you’re going to burn those onions! Don’t be lazy about it. You have to keep stirring them, you gotta keep your eyes on them!” But that constant stream of verbal abuse was laced with a critical voice that our dinner table desperately needed, lest we all grew up thinking that burnt onions were normal.

MY FATHER isn’t just an over-the-shoulder cook. He’s also a man of action. He does not hesitate to assert his authority in the kitchen, usually on matters that overlap with his Dutch heritage. Oh, he pretends some familiarity with the all-American pastimes of turkey carving and hamburger grilling, but his best medium has always been boiling and braising, simple techniques that betray his family’s rather recent peasant past. Unless his mother is in the house, he is the seasoner and final judge of every pot of pea soup, and is solely responsible for hutspot, a chunky mash of boiled potatoes, carrots, and onions.

Through generous relatives in Europe and regular visits to a Dutch store three towns over, he kept the family supplied with foodstuffs that we otherwise would never have heard of, things such as German cookies, Gouda cheese, and salt licorice.

Life at our house wasn’t all chocolate sprinkles and pickled herring, though. Dad kept a real old-country table, at which papa got first pick of the food, mama got the scrapings from the pot, and the kids fought over everything in between. (This arrangement got confusing as “the kids” grew up and had children of their own, but he still uses it.) As long as he got his, we could figure out the rest. And usually we did. At a very early age we all had an intuitive grasp of any problems involving fractions and food.

I was a lot older before I understood the significance of my father’s food obsession. He and his family lived in Nazi-occupied Netherlands, which means that most of their diet was potato or cabbage, things that could be begged or gleaned. His mother, my oma (Dutch for grandmother), still takes great pleasure in recalling how she rode 10 miles on a bicycle with no tires–just rims–for a rare couple of eggs.

Dad was very young at the time, maybe 4 or 5 years old, and he doesn’t talk about it often. But occasionally Oma will be over for dinner, and she’ll be talking about the Netherlands and about the Nazis and the bike with no tires and the soup with nothing in it but a rotten onion. My dad, meanwhile, scoops himself out a steaming plate of hutspot. While the rest of the family listens again to the story of his deprived past, he looks at the present abundance, measuring it with his eye, and sneaks another dab from the pot.

From the June 14-20, 2001 issue of the Northern California Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Phoenix Theatre, Powerhouse Brewing Co.

0

Club Update

Inn out, Phoenix busted, Powerhouse powers up

By Patrick Sullivan and Paula Harris

CLUBS ARE CLOSING, clubs are in trouble with the cops, and new clubs are springing up in the last places you’d expect. So it goes on the live-music scene in Sonoma County, where turmoil is a way of life and fans quickly learn to expect the unexpected.

Let’s start with the bad news. First, the Phoenix Theatre in Petaluma is in trouble again. Longtime Phoenix manager Tom Gaffey won’t provide many details, but he’s not happy with the Petaluma Police Department and the City Manager’s Office. “We’re back to doing battle with the city again,” Gaffey says. “I think I kind of got ambushed here.”

Partly because of that pressure, Gaffey is concentrating on local bands for now, rather than hosting the big-name touring acts like Goldfinger and NOFX that were hitting the Phoenix for a while. One new offering: local high school bands will play the club every Wednesday at 8 p.m. through August.

There’s trouble of a more terminal nature over at the Inn of the Beginning. The legendary Cotati music venue will probably shut its doors for good in July, according to owner Scott Wagner. The club is unprofitable, and Wagner just lost his job in the high- tech crash, so he can no longer subsidize the music venue. The only way out? Wagner says the community can save the club by delivering both money and a vision for the future at two upcoming public meetings on June 19 and 21. For details, call 707/664-1522.

Bummed yet? Well, don’t fret, ’cause there’s a bit of good news too. A couple of new venues seem to be humming along fairly well: the Jazz Jam Cafe in Sebastopol and Felix and Louie’s Restaurant and Bar in Healdsburg are both operating smoothly. And Clo’s Parkside Grill in Santa Rosa is back to offering live music.

Most surprising event: a new all-ages music venue has just opened its doors in Rohnert Park, of all places. The Vision, a new teen center owned and operated by the city of Rohert Park, started staging shows by local bands in May. A group of students from Rancho Cotate High School assists with the programming under the supervision of John Hartnett, the city’s manager of Recreation and Services.

“We’re just feeling it out, seeing what the kids want and how things go,” Hartnett says. The next show at the Vision, which is located at 450 Civic Center Drive, takes Saturday, June 16, and features S.E.E.D., Stygian Creek, and others. For details, call 707/588-3474.

And finally, the Powerhouse Brewing Co.–a brew pub and live-music venue on Petaluma Avenue in Sebastopol–is getting a bit of a makeover. The Powerhouse is doubling the size of its outdoor beer garden with the addition of a large grass lawn, an outdoor stage area, and expanded al fresco dining.

The new beer garden, in an area that used to be a parking lot, will provide seating for more than 100 people. “We encourage people to bring lawn furniture and blankets,” says Powerhouse owner Bill Brandt. “We’re going to be getting some music in there pretty fast.”

In addition to a series of outdoor concerts (tentatively featuring such artists as the Dirty Dozen, Los Hombres Calientes, and the Dave Nelson Band), Brandt promises a musical Friday night happy hour. “We’re going to drag the piano outside under the trees and have local piano players perform,” he says.

Although Brandt comments that noise will have to be kept “toned down,” he adds that even though he’s had to wait a while for all the necessary permits, the city has been pretty receptive to the project. The first outdoor show is planned for next month, and outdoor entertainment will run from late spring until mid-fall each year. The Powerhouse’s regular live entertainment will continue inside.

From the June 14-20, 2001 issue of the Northern California Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Horst Trave

0

Exuberant juice: Decade No. 8 finds Healdsburg abstract painter Horst Trave staying fresh and modern. His work is the subject of a new exhibit at Quicksilver Mining Co.

Burning Brush

Horst Trave explores mysteries of color and line

By Gretchen Giles

SIXTY YEARS is not too long to be concerned with the taut longing of the vertical line, to trace the stiff meet of a triangle’s joints, and to investigate the infinite grace of the circle. And indeed, Healdsburg painter Horst Trave remains distinctly interested. A slight, self-effacing man with a German accent still flavoring his speech, Trave is among the original GI practitioners of that muscular post-WWII explosion known as San Francisco Abstract Expressionism.

With the hard-drinking antics of Jackson Pollock in cinematic vogue, it is perhaps easy to forget the explosive excitement that returning soldiers felt when finally able to make art, not war. Trave, a German native who fled his homeland with the Nazi uprising, made his way to the States in 1941. Once here, he was promptly drafted and sent back to Germany, where he was among the first GIs to enter Berlin after Hitler’s fall. Returning to the United States, Trave enrolled in the California School of Fine Arts (now known as the San Francisco Art Institute) and immersed himself in the heady ether of the canvas, an objective realm owing everything to nature but nothing to representation.

Much has been written about irascible abstractionist Clyfford Still, Sonoma County artists William Morehouse, Robert McChesney, and Wally Hedrick, objective painter Frank Lobdell, and certainly such masters as Sam Francis, Hassel Smith, Edward Corbett, and Richard Diebenkorn.

But it’s a fair bet that Trave’s name dings not much recognition in the collective remembrance. Still, Trave, 82, was one of the original bohemians of San Francisco’s art explosion, and in 1949 he became a co-founder of the 12-member Metart Galleries, the first “Beat” gallery by the Bay. The artists in the collective each had a one-man show in concordance with their belief that group shows dilute presentation and meaning–their exhibition slots were selected through chance by drawing straws.

“I was pretty much a loner,” Trave remembered in a 1996 interview of his life following the Metart experience. “And all of those people at that time, they were involved in sort of a mutual-admiration thing; they backed each other up. I never took part in it; I sort of very quietly did the things that I wanted to do. My attitude to paintings was I did paintings because they were meaningful to me, but society didn’t owe me a thing. And because of my morality and upbringing, I also felt that it was important for a painter to make his living in a useful way.”

So Trave built houses in the summer and taught art during the school year. He remarried, had children, and retired in 1978. Many of the brightest stars of his youth have been eclipsed by mortality, but Trave paints on, staying fresh and modern and deeply interested in the revealing mysteries of color and line, serenity and jostle. An exhibit of some of his newest work, paintings dating from 1997 to 2001, opens June 7 at the Quicksilver Mine Co. in Sebastopol.

The works collected in the “Recent Paintings” exhibit for the Quicksilver are, as with all of his pieces, titled solely for the day he finished them. “I don’t like to get lyrical,” Trave says, standing in his studio on a recent late-spring afternoon.

10-3-97 features four triangulated forms that appear to be walking single file. “I see the figures later,” he says. “I don’t intend them.” This one, he admits, now reminds him of “that old German fairy tale ‘The Musicians of Bremen.’ ” Its spare jazz reminds the visitor of Don Quixote. “I’ve never been interested in anything that’s easily identified,” says Trave with a smile.

While many abstract painters begin with the easily identifiable human form, bowl of fruit, or landscapes scenes–slowly honing those subjects down to their very structural bones, erasing and discarding in a quest to find essence–Trave started that way. He’s almost always been an abstractionist, save for early cartoons and illustrations he did as a young man. “I have a natural tendency to long for tension,” he says. “Stroke and counterstroke. There’s something like that in music, I believe.”

The near-musical tension that Trave achieves on the canvas in his eighth decade dances upon smoky, mute-gray backgrounds, the many layered color of its forms invariably reaching up to the top-right-corner trap of the canvas, a constricted world only they inhabit.

ON THE OTHER hand, a set of vibrant works on paper are quickly built with a palette knife, giving them an exuberant juice that Trave acknowledges is “more direct.” But overall, he says, “I’m trying to release something, energies, and the real happening is on the canvas when I’m painting.”

While he may not be painting from life, Trave is hugely interested in it. “There’s a real reaching toward nature, [which] I’m a part of,” he says. “I’m closer to nature than to any religion. . . . The straight line can create factories and machinery that can make life easier for us, but we tend to overdo it and hurt ourselves. I’ve been longing for my vertical works, but again, they remind me of machinery and the overwhelming of nature.

“It’s all so conflicted.”

When asked why, after more than 60 years of painting without major recognition, he still goes out to his studio every day to do it all over again, Trave responds thoughtfully.

“It makes me feel,” he says, “like a real person.”

‘Horst Trave: Recent Paintings”‘ opens Thursday, June 7, at the Quicksilver Mine Co., with a reception from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. The exhibit continues through July 15 at 154 N. Main St., Sebastopol. Hours are daily, 10 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. 707/829-2416.

From the June 7-13, 2001 issue of Metro, Silicon Valley’s Weekly Newspaper.

© 2001 Metro Publishing Inc. MetroActive is affiliated with the Boulevards Network.

For more information about the San Jose/Silicon Valley area, visit sanjose.com.

No-Spray Action Network

0

Summer harvest: The author engaged in a months-long process of negotiations with local grape growers.

Building Bridges

A personal view of a successful campaign to stop forced pesticide spraying

By Shepherd Bliss

NO NONORGANIC pesticide application will be made on property without the owner or resident’s approval, reads a joint agreement reached last week by the No-Spray Action Network, the agricultural commissioner, the Sonoma County Grape Growers Association, and other groups. The accord was hammered out during four months at over a dozen negotiating sessions on how to deal with the glassy-winged sharpshooter, an insect that carries a bacterial disease deadly to wine grapes.

The deal is a win-win situation in which both sides basically got what they most wanted: No-Spray, a loose-knit coalition of activists prepared to fight the spraying with civil disobedience, obtained options to forced synthetic pesticide spraying against a resident’s will; and the grape growers–who represent a nearly $2 billion industry–got protection for their crops from the sharpshooter.

At public hearings and in the press during the previous six months, the wine industry and environmentalists fought fiercely over forced pesticide spraying. Sharp words were exchanged before and after the November decision by the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors to permit forced spraying on private property to combat the insect that can bring Pierce’s disease, which now threatens North Bay vineyards.

The new agreement gives people the freedom to choose from four options to control the sharpshooter: mechanical means, such as removal by hand or vacuuming; less harmful organic insecticides and repellents; physical removal of the infested plant; and, as a last straw, synthetic insecticides “with information on their relative safety.”

The accord creates a GWSS Task Force composed of four environmentalists, four grape growers, and one unaligned representative. This group will advise Sonoma County Agricultural Commissioner John Westoby and assist him in dealing with problems. Though Westoby says it is not his intention to spray synthetic chemicals without permission, by state law he does retain that authority.

When Nick Frey, the executive director of the Sonoma County Grape Growers Association, called in February to suggest that growers and environmentalists sit down and talk, I had doubts. We had been opponents in debates before the Board of Supervisors and in the press. I thought that it was worth giving collaboration a chance, but I did not have much faith in it.

Frey also called local No-Spray activists Dave Henson and Brock Dolman of the Occidental Arts and Ecology Center; the Sierra Club; and such unaligned groups as the Community Alliance with Family Farmers and California Certified Organic Farmers.

We all agreed to meet.

My reservations stemmed from participating during l997 and l998 in the early negotiations between environmentalists and the wine industry on the county Hillside Ordinance, originally intended to restrict vineyard construction on steep slopes. After half a dozen sessions or so, I felt the powerful wine industry was more likely to get what it wanted, whereas the environment would continue to be damaged. Since then, working relations between the environmental and agricultural communities had worsened, owing to acrimonious conflict over the failed Rural Heritage Initiative on the l999 ballot.

When No-Spray was forming a team of negotiators to sit down with the grape growers, I decided to remain on the sidelines, listening. Henson emerged as No-Spray’s lead negotiator. After he and others reported on how cooperative and fruitful the negotiations were going, I decided to drop in to sense the tone of the deliberations. I had remembered grape grower Peter Haywood of the Sonoma Valley Vintners and Growers Alliance from the earlier Hillside Ordinance negotiations as an outspoken, adamant, and articulate advocate. Earlier this year we clashed outside the Petaluma City Hall when a No-Spray resolution came before the Petaluma City Council. But here he was, in person, sitting on the other side of the table, and we were looking at each other eye to eye, in a cooperative environment. Though quite protective of his vines, Haywood turned out to be a thoughtful negotiator genuinely interested in solutions.

After our final meeting, Haywood observed, “This process has been very effective in developing standards to have full support of the community. Grape growers are now much better protected by the support of the community. It is likely that the sharpshooter will gain entrance to Sonoma County on private property. It will require participation of the property owner to keep out the [pest]. Support from the entire community is essential for any program to eradicate the sharpshooter to be successful.”

The need for public support helped bring the grape growers to the table. Critical to building public awareness of pesticide dangers were the resolutions against forced spraying passed earlier this year by the city councils of Sebastopol, Sonoma, and Windsor.

Also, No-Spray launched an aggressive campaign to train property owners in civil disobedience and developed a media strategy (as did the grape growers), circulating a statement to activists on “Telling Your Story to the Media.” The media strategy worked. The Press Democrat‘s original articles and editorials tended to favor the wine industry’s view and to demonize this insect. The daily was doing what MIT linguist Noam Chomsky describes as “manufacturing consent” to attack an insect by using deadly poison that would damage people, other animals, and the environment.

But No-Spray began to refute this propaganda with letters to editors; in articles in weeklies such as the Northern California Bohemian (and its predecessor the Sonoma County Independent) and Sonoma West-Times; and on KPFA-FM and KRCB-FM radio. Regional coverage in the San Francisco Chronicle and statewide coverage in the Los Angeles Times were more balanced, as was a report on National Public Radio. CBS-TV’s 60 Minutes recently conducted interviews in the county for a sharpshooter story scheduled for September.

We were about halfway through the negotiations when Westoby joined the deliberations. After the final meeting, he agreed that “this has been a good process–much better than the alternative. It is good to come to an agreement on the goals of detecting and keeping the sharpshooter out of Sonoma County. This is a real triumph.”

Supervisor Mike Reilly concurred: “This agreement is a real accomplishment,” he said, “a credit to everyone who worked on it.”

By the time No-Spray’s final coordinating council met to reach consensus on the agreement, one person suggested making a sign that said, “Support Our Agricultural Commissioner.”

Negotiators from both the grape-growing and environmental communities assured Westoby that they would support him in efforts to protect the local community and provide people choices, including those that are chemically vulnerable. This community support is a key factor in encouraging Westoby to try nontoxic solutions.

Clearly, the grape growers needed the collaboration of No-Spray. The first step toward controlling the sharpshooter is to discover it. If residents do not willingly allow the agricultural commissioner on their property to inspect, it will be difficult to find the sharpshooter. No-Spray activists made it clear that they would not allow the government on their property if it would result in forced spraying. And they would defend the properties of others from forced entry.

IF THE AGREEMENT breaks down, No-Spray plans to engage in civil disobedience to protect homes, yards, gardens, and farms. Marlena Machol of Sebastopol, a grandmother with children who have been damaged by pesticides, notes, “If spraying without permission does occur, the community at large would lose trust in the process and go back to resistance. Then infestation would occur that would not be found until it is too late, because we will not let the inspectors onto our yards and farms.”

At a meeting of five No-Spray affinity groups, Neil Harvey of the Riverbillies observed, “We’ve made a great breakthrough here. But we should not stand down. We need to keep up the pressure.”

The meeting’s consensus was to maintain visibility and to continue building a base for further action, if necessary.

“This document is based on trust and power–our ability to mobilize people,” Dave Henson contends. “It is about creating relationships. By working together for months, we have created a culture of cooperation,” he adds. “Not a legalistic document, this is a statement of principles that establishes a way of working together that hopefully will become a model for the future here and elsewhere in the state.

“Sonoma County will have many other agricultural and ecological issues to address beyond the sharpshooter, and environmental groups will help us resolve those issues as they emerge.”

Shepherd Bliss owns the organic Kokopelli Farm in west Sonoma County. He can be reached at sb*@*on.net.

From the June 7-13, 2001 issue of the Northern California Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Open Mic

0

Randy & Me

By C.D. Payne

DO YOU EVER wish you had cut loose a little more as a child? Back in 1950s Ohio, I was so buttoned down I was the teacher’s pet for six straight years–still a record at my grade school. My only break from youthful respectability came in my long association with a troublemaking pal named Randy.

Even when Randy was just a tot, his idea of fun was vandalizing gas-station restrooms or shoveling someone’s gravel driveway into the corner mailbox. (This latter act may have been a federal crime.)

I swallowed my Goody Two Shoes compunctions and followed along as Randy climbed over fences to explore the mossy and dripping interiors of abandoned power dams. Or got us stuck in the churned-up mud of an off-limits construction site–mud so tenacious it sucked the shoes right off our feet.

Fortunately, I missed out on Randy’s greatest depredation. He was leading another kid astray the day the two of them burned down a neighbor’s garage containing two classic cars. I never thought any kid could get in as much trouble as he did that time.

More typical was the afternoon Randy shoplifted an entire case of brown shoe polish and talked me into peddling the hot goods door to door with him for a buck a can. Though suspiciously out of uniform, we claimed to be enterprising Boy Scouts. We plodded on through a drenching thunderstorm and never sold a single can. Worse, we happened to knock on the door of someone who knew Randy’s parents.

A half hour after I got home, Randy telephoned and belligerently demanded to know where I had obtained the shoe polish. I could sense an indignant parent was breathing down his neck. Taking advantage of my spotless reputation, I denied any knowledge of the matter. As usual, it was Randy who got the whipping.

I lost contact with Randy over the years, but I did run into his dad at a family picnic back in Ohio a few weeks ago. As you might expect, the news of Randy was not good. After an indifferent high-school career, he went into computer programming and is now a vice president of one of the nation’s five largest banks.

Sebastopol writer C. D. Payne’s sixth book, ‘Cut to the Twisp,’ will be published in August.

From the June 7-13, 2001 issue of the Northern California Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Jefferson Starship

0

Feed Your Head

Jefferson Starship reprises a classic album

By Greg Cahill

“YOU KNOW, I sort of revolt at the use of that term ‘psychedelic’ because it limits everything so much, and it’s really not what the ’60s was all about,” says Paul Kantner, co-founder of the Jefferson Airplane, sounding mildly peeved during a phone interview from his San Francisco home. “It’s like the focus on drugs by the government and other facilities of those times making such a big deal out of it. In reality, drugs and psychedelia were a very small part of those times, sort of like a very tasty dessert at a great dinner. It was just part of the process, and the drugs were often simply a flag to wave in the establishment’s face.

“In fact, there was a newness and a passion for that newness that really signified those times.”

The 60-year-old Kantner, who learned to question authority early in life as a kid at a Catholic military boarding school, had no trouble taking up the banner for the then-emerging counterculture. And his rallying cry resonated first on Surrealistic Pillow (RCA), the Jefferson Airplane’s 1967 acid-rock masterpiece released at the height of the Summer of Love.

On June 12, the newly retooled Jefferson Starship will reprise that classic album–in its entirety–at the Mystic Theatre in Petaluma. The current lineup features acid-rock icons Kantner and Marty Balin, guitarist Slick Aguilar (from the old Kantner, Balin, Casady Band), drummer Prairie Prince of the Tubes, keyboardist Chris Smith, and vocalist Diana Mangano.

“Somebody dragged me into this one,” says Kantner laughingly, adding that last year the band re-created 1969’s breakthrough Volunteers album on stage. “So we do it along with a body of older and newer works, and apparently it works pretty well.

“It’s a lot of fun.”

It’s worth recalling he significance of the 1967 Jefferson Airplane–guitarist Kantner, vocalists Balin and Grace Slick, guitarist Jorma Kaukonen, bassist Jack Casady, and drummer Spencer Dryden–and their psychedelic landmark Surrealistic Pillow, an album that holds up amazingly well after all these years. “The band boasted a lineup none of its peers could match . . . ; it was the fertile exchange of diverse styles and ideas among the members that produced a vision darker and deeper than any other in acid rock,” wrote music critic Paul Evans in the Rolling Stone Album Guide.

Slick, then newly recruited to take over for the pregnant Signe Anderson, was responsible for a large part of that success. Indeed, her commanding presence on “White Rabbit,” in which she chillingly instructs the listener to “feed your head,” exhibits an icy Wagnerian force unparalleled in ’60s rock. It was a powerful performance that landed her a spread in Life magazine.

“Her singing made [Slick] the counterpart of San Francisco’s other reigning diva, Janis Joplin,” Evans notes. “Where Janis was raw blues urgency, her persona combining the toughness of a biker’s mama with the pathos of a strayed waif, Slick was queenly, stentorian, her voice an instrument of almost operatic authority and her beauty dark, mysterious, and remote.”

On the strength of Slick’s singing, Surrealistic Pillow–which spawned the Top 10 singles “Somebody to Love” and the anthemic “White Rabbit,” and sold more than a half million copies–became responsible for cracking open Top 40 AM radio, allowing acid rock to flow into the cultural mainstream.

The band had hit its stride. American music would never be the same.

“We were just going into the studio and playing some music,” Kantner says of the album’s fruitful recording sessions. “You don’t really have any sense of that when you’re doing it. There was no plan or thought or realization that anything special was really going on.”

SIX MONTHS after the release of Surrealistic Pillow, the Jefferson Airplane took a sharp commercial detour, releasing the wildly experimental After Bathing at Baxter’s–described by one critic as “a great big fuck you to the recording industry.”

“It can get a little chaotic and anarchic every now and again, but in the long run there’s a certain heat and passion there that comes out of that friction and makes for exciting musical moments,” Kantner concludes. “Baxter’s was a very experimental album–total anarchy. That was the nature of the times. As Bay Area residents often do, we went over the line. But that’s what experimentation and exploration is all about. I mean, explorers don’t go out and walk down well-cut pathways. They find a new forest and blaze a new trail. In that sense we were breaking free from the studio system and the whole music business and stating our own purpose and place in it, however chaotically.

“[Baxter’s] was a total failure in many ways, but there also was a certain freedom that helped resolve itself in future albums.”

Jefferson Starship perform Tuesday, June 12, at 8 p.m. at the Mystic Theatre, 23 Petaluma Blvd. N., Petaluma. Tickets are $20. 707/765-2121.

From the June 7-13, 2001 issue of the Northern California Bohemian.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Absinthe

Painting by Edgar Degas Liquid Dreams Chasing Baudelaire, Oscar Wilde, and other dead devotees in Barcelona's bohemian barrio By Taras Grescoe IT DROVE BAUDELAIRE to Belgium, then to an early grave; it left Paul Verlaine a hollow-eyed wreck, wandering from bar to bar in Paris' Latin Quarter accompanied by...

‘Keep the River on Your Right: A Modern Cannibal Tale’

On Exhibit 'River' treats Tobias Schneebaum like the Wild Man of Borneo By THE NEW documentary Keep the River on Your Right: A Modern Cannibal Tale is an engrossing visit to three continents, with journeys to the rainy capital of a New Guinean province, the jungles beyond Machu Picchu, and Coney...

Open Mic

Out of the Box By Tara Treasurefield WE'VE HAD ENOUGH. While state officials pose for photo ops, we're drowning in pesticides. We can't breathe. Nature is dying. Our pets are dying. Our children are dying. To survive, we must demand freedom from toxic trespass. We have no choice. State regulatory agencies block even modest...

Last Day Saloon

Music man: Last Day Saloon Santa Rosa owner Dave Daher New Day Dawns Last Day Saloon owner sets up second shop in Santa Rosa By Paula Harris "WHAT THE HELL IS this for?" bellowed Dave Daher. A Camel Light gripped between his fingers, Daher stabbed at a...

Foodie Father

Props for Pops A foodie in suburbia rules the roost By Marina Wolf IT'S ALL MOM'S FAULT. That's the line you'll get from almost anyone confessing to a less-than-enlightened culinary background. I've heard aspiring chefs volunteer this information like politicians dumping their dirt before anyone else can dig it up. "My...

Phoenix Theatre, Powerhouse Brewing Co.

Club Update Inn out, Phoenix busted, Powerhouse powers up By Patrick Sullivan and Paula Harris CLUBS ARE CLOSING, clubs are in trouble with the cops, and new clubs are springing up in the last places you'd expect. So it goes on the live-music scene in Sonoma County, where turmoil is a...

Horst Trave

Exuberant juice: Decade No. 8 finds Healdsburg abstract painter Horst Trave staying fresh and modern. His work is the subject of a new exhibit at Quicksilver Mining Co. Burning Brush Horst Trave explores mysteries of color and line By Gretchen Giles SIXTY YEARS is not too...

No-Spray Action Network

Summer harvest: The author engaged in a months-long process of negotiations with local grape growers. Building Bridges A personal view of a successful campaign to stop forced pesticide spraying By Shepherd Bliss NO NONORGANIC pesticide application will be made on property without the owner or resident's...

Open Mic

Randy & Me By C.D. Payne DO YOU EVER wish you had cut loose a little more as a child? Back in 1950s Ohio, I was so buttoned down I was the teacher's pet for six straight years--still a record at my grade school. My only break from youthful respectability came in my long...

Jefferson Starship

Feed Your Head Jefferson Starship reprises a classic album By Greg Cahill "YOU KNOW, I sort of revolt at the use of that term 'psychedelic' because it limits everything so much, and it's really not what the '60s was all about," says Paul Kantner, co-founder of the Jefferson Airplane, sounding mildly...
11,084FansLike
4,606FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow