Brrrrrrrrrrr

0

Baby, it’s cold outside, but please, let’s lay off the denialist snowball posturing—global warming is a very real phenomenon, and there’s been lots of action on that critical political front since the November elections.

This week, a coalition of California energy providers, local governments and environmental organizations released a policy roadmap outlining a new statewide push to deal with a very large elephant in the living room: the continued burning of fossil fuels in homes and buildings—identified as a major blind spot in the state’s ongoing GHG-reduction effort.

The Building Decarbonization Coalition announced the initiative this week through the Oakland-based Sunshine Strategies media firm. The firm notes that while homes and buildings are responsible for 25 percent of annual greenhouse-gas emissions in the state every year, “unlike other high-emitting sectors, no comprehensive plan exists to help the state cut those emissions, the majority of which are caused by fossil fuel appliances like space and water heaters.” Hey, but it’s cold out there! As Mom used to say: Put on a sweater.

The coalition released a report on Feb. 12 that emphasizes an urgent need to accelerate the development of zero-emission homes and buildings in the state, if California’s to meet its GHG reduction plans before the whole planet just gives up the ghost. It’s all very “Green New Deal,” in its own right.

On that note, there are hard-working lawmakers out there working to reverse the reversals on climate change policy, but most of the Washington Republicans we’re hearing from these days are happy to just beat up on the Green New Deal. Signs of bipartisan agreement on climate change are scant and negligible.

U.S. Rep. Jared Huffman was one of 56 lawmakers to introduce the Still in Paris congressional resolution this week that reaffirms Congress’ support of the Paris Agreement (Blue Dog Dem Rep. Mike Thompson did not sign the resolution). President Donald Trump announced the United States would exit the Paris Agreement in 2017. The resolution is being promoted as a “bipartisan” reaffirmation of the Unites States’ participation in global efforts to combat global warming. It’s a bipartisan bill, barely: Pennsylvania Republican Brian Fitzpatrick is the only member of the House GOP to cosponsor the resolution.

Huffman was recently named to the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis and he also introduced a resolution this week that seeks to push back against Trump’s efforts to open Alaska’s arctic wilderness to fossil-fuel drilling. The bill to restore Arctic National Wildlife Refuge protections was promoted by House Democrats as a bipartisan bill. One hundred lawmakers co-sponsored the bill and yes—the only Republican co-sponsor was Fitzpatrick.

Tom Gogola is warming up to the idea of hiding under the blankets for a while.

Letters to the Editor: February 13, 2019

Who Will Pay?

I agree with Cal Fire Chief Ken Pilmot on banning new homes in fire-prone areas (Open Mic, Jan. 30). But to require 20-foot-wide roads (are you adding the two-foot shoulders to both sides of the 20-foot-wide road—24 feet—or 16-foot-wide roads with shoulders?) for all dead-end roads would be cost-prohibitive. It would cost more to improve an existing road or cut a new 20-foot-wide road than the land and home would be worth. Who do you suggest pay for these new requirements: the county or the property owners?

Napa

Oppress the Rich

I have empathy for Ms. Stephanie Land (“Parenting Below the Poverty Line,” Feb. 6), as I supported myself for decades with housecleaning and a variety of odd jobs. I have lived frugally, and often paid taxes as well.

I couldn’t work much due to my partial disability, chronic fatigue syndrome. Our government rarely recognizes this disability, and I did not get SSI. I am grateful for the government help that I do get.

Historically, it has been almost impossible for the poor to achieve any economic or social rights progress in America and globally. Remember, if we, the poor people, refuse to provide more slaves/cannon fodder for the rich, by not having children, then the middle class will be next to be oppressed. When they refuse this treatment, then the rich will be oppressed, and then finally the “1 percenters” will have to clean their own damn toilets.

Santa Rosa

Important and Revealing

Thank you for the piece on Maid, a revealing, even important, memoir. The article had me at “young mother who fled an abusive relationship.” From here begins the author’s path into poverty, and how could it not, without a reliable partner or family to help, and without, yet, an education to lead to a secure job.

This begs the question, why did Ms. Land go through with her pregnancy? Surely, there is a sad tale that begat her pairing with an abuser. Congrats to her for leaving! But while the choice to become a single parent is, OK, honorable, of course it comes with a lifetime of responsibility and costs. As to public shaming for using the stamps for whatever she wants, shame on them! I’m happy to pay taxes for assistance and shelters. A safety net is crucial to a successful society.

I write this as one who, with no parental aid, put herself through college waitressing and bartending, and when along the way I was careless and got pregnant, made the difficult choice to not become a “young mother.” I live with that. A close friend of mine then, however, bravely chose to keep a child from a far-flung one-nighter.

She knew what she was getting into raising a child alone. The girl was her pride and joy. She took one step at a time and dreamed of the day she would study art, which she eventually did, slinging steaks to pay her way to a masters degree and now teaches high school art. Her choice to be a young mother was financially challenging, no surprise. But she wouldn’t have changed a thing. After all, we can’t change what we already did, can we? We can only learn to cope, bootstraps and all, and, well, maybe write a book about it.

Sebastopol

Write to us at le*****@******an.com.

Very Old Bones

The last time I used, it was 50 years ago, and now I don’t know whether to eat it, smoke it or rub it in,” a white-haired gentleman complains to Eli Melrod, the co-founder and CEO at Sol, Sebastopol’s model dispensary, where one-third of the customers are over 60 years old and half are women.

Once upon a time, baby boomers smoked dope and got stoned. Now many suffer from aches and pains, can’t sleep and have lost their zest. When it comes to medical cannabis, they don’t know what or who to trust.

Enter two experts: entrepreneur extraordinaire, Eli Melrod, who grew up and came of age with dispensaries; and Mike Benziger—from Glentucky Farms in Glen Ellen—the world’s foremost biodynamic cannabis cultivator, and a renowned winemaker, too.

On a rainy day, 55 “newbies,” as Melrod calls them, descend on the Sebastopol Senior Center to hear the dynamic duo, who sound like a mutual admiration society, and why not? No one can answer questions about cannabis more clearly than Benziger, a cancer survivor himself, and Melrod—whose father has battled cancer—and who tells the crowd, “At Sol, we want relationships, not transactions.”

The newbies are mostly women, many from Oakmont eager to learn, as one of them explains, “what we’ve been missing all our adult lives and how to find it.” Chris from Sebastopol found it a few years ago. “I grow from seeds. I recognize the males and pull them before they get to my females,” she says. “Cannabis is the love of my life.”

Scotty King, the senior center’s operations manager, kicks off the event—which is billed as “Let’s Talk Cannabis”—with a memory. “My mom smoked weed in the 1960s and told me not to say anything at school,” he explains. “We’ve come a long way.”

Benziger looks at him and then at the newbies and says, “Not far enough. If you want free pot next time, petition your representatives.” Benziger sings the praises of compost, microbes, biodynamic farming and Sol’s CEO. “Eli isn’t afraid to come into the field and get his boots muddy,” he says.

Melrod then took over and touted the benefits of terpenes, THC and CBD. He and Benziger both insist that CBD needs THC to do its job. They swear by outdoor cultivation in direct sunlight, and swear at state and local regulators. Benziger discourages the newbies from investing in the cannabiz, saying, “It’s too risky.”

A woman in the front row asks, “After harvesting, what do you do with the leaves.” Benziger smiles and exclaims, “That’s a great question!” Melrod adds, “Come to Sol. We’ll tell you everything you need to know about leaves, flowers, capsules, tinctures and more.”

Jonah Raskin puffs, puffs and then passes.

Dance of Death

Haunted houses are bad, but what’s really frightening is a haunted city.

The 2018 remake of Italian horror director Dario Argento’s

Suspiria—“six acts and an epilogue in divided Berlin”—shows a coven of bloodthirsty witches as just one cadre of plotters in a city riddled with them. It unfolds during the “German Autumn” of 1977, the era of the Red Army Faction, of kidnappers and terror bombings.

In the pre-titles to Luca Guadagnino’s remake, a patient bursts in on the aged German psychiatrist Dr. Joseph Klemperer (Tilda Swinton in one of multiple parts). The patient, Patricia (Chloë Grace Moretz), has tales of persecution, claiming the instructors at her dance academy are witches, and are threatening to gut her. She leaves behind baffling notebooks filled with strange geometric patterns.

During the titles, a chilling D-minor waltz by Thom Yorke of Radiohead plays on what sounds like an imperfectly tuned dance studio rehearsal piano. We witness the last gasps of an Amish woman (Malgorzata Bela), mutely pleading for the end.

In Berlin, mere feet from the graffitied Wall, is a Brutalist performance hall, of streaky green marble and dingy curtains, called the Markos Tanzgruppe, where a new dancer, Susie (Dakota Johnson)—daughter of the dying woman we just saw—is moving into the dormitories to take Patricia’s place. The official story is that Patricia dropped out to join the bomb-throwing rebels.

If there is an alchemy in ballet—making the human body do what it normally can’t—it explains a favorite movie fantasy that choreographed beauty comes at a sacrifice. What if everything artists talks casually about, regarding the “ritual” in their art, were true?

The biggest idea in Argento’s 1977 original Suspiria was an Unholy Trinity of three mothers, older than the Fates, and that’s the most important carryover into this new version. As in the original, there are fantastically shocking images, but Suspiria is not completely morbid; the movie goes full-throatedly emotional in its last shot. It’s summer finally, and the camera pulls up to note the last relic of a love which has already been erased from life by witchcraft and history.

‘Suspiria’ is available to rent on Amazon.com.

Backyard Burgundy

0

Chuck Easley is no Frenchman, and he’s the first to admit it. So why fly the tricolor so high above a funky old truck that marks the road to—hey, isn’t that the road to Kaz?

Kaz has left the building, I discovered back in 2015 when driving by this rambling little bodega tucked away off Adobe Canyon Road. For over a decade, winemaker Richard Kasmier, the Kaz, endeared visitors to his zany little winery with an ever-experimental array of varietals and blends. How could these new Francophiles follow up that act?

Enter the chicken. While I’m nosing a sample of 2016 Bacigalupi Vineyard Chardonnay ($65) in the winery’s backyard, a curious hen struts across the gravel to give me sidelong glances. The hen wants a treat—I have none but the Chardonnay, treating me to a characteristic citrus core of Bacigalupi fruit seasoned with nut oil and tropical fruit.

Though there’s a perfectly comfortable tasting room inside, this is where most people like to taste, proprietor Chuck Easley explains at a rustic bar set up beside a pond teeming with koi. The pond was created by Kaz, his way of satisfying the fire department’s water-storage requirements in his own style. It came in handy in October 2017, when most of the property was saved from spot fires one water bucket at a time, with help from an ember-rebuffing redwood tree that towers above a set of tables, available for seated tastings by reservation, and a verdant, if not exactly regulation-smooth lawn studded with wickets. Croquet, monsieur?

There is a Frenchman or two in the winery’s history, after all: nurserymen who brought Pinot Noir cuttings to California back in 1854 and founded a wine dynasty that, long story short, spawned the La Rochelle boutique label. For the longer story, ask Chuck—though a tad mellower than the Kaz, he’s full of good wine stories.

Lovers of Burgundy wine may like the house style here, too. The Pinot Noirs, from the bright and spicy 2016 van der Kamp Vineyard ($60) to the plusher 2015 El Coro Vineyard ($60), play notes of red fruit and subtle spice like variations on a theme across the palate—even the rare 2016 Pinot Meunier ($48), which Easley says is the bane of his attempt to focus on 17 different Pinot Noirs. “What they remember when they leave,” he says of many visitors, “is the Pinot Meunier.” That, or the chickens and the ring toss.

La Rochelle Winery, 233 Adobe Canyon Road, Kenwood. Daily, 11am–5pm; winter hours, closed Tuesday–Wednesday. Tasting fee, $20. 707.302.8000.

In Session

0

Long-running concert series Monday Night Edutainment (MNE) at HopMonk Tavern in Sebastopol inspires a feeling similar to that of listening to a new album from a band you love: you hear the familiar beats and rhythms, but you also hear new sounds, sometimes surprising and out of character.

For DJ Jacques, introducing audiences to new sounds is just as important as giving them the music they came for. This is the concept of MNE: music as not simply a form of entertainment, but also a channel for education.

DJ Jacques has been DJ-ing HopMonk’s MNE since its formation in 2001. His musical style starts with Jamaican bass and spins off to include hip-hop percussion or Latin rhythms, often playing with traditional and modern elements of reggae dancehall.

“I don’t believe in loving just one thing,” Jacques says. Although the Monday nights are sometimes characterized as simply reggae nights, Jacques rejects this classification, as he often includes Latin, hip-hop and jazz artists, basing criteria of new artists on quality rather than genre. “My job is to get the artists the audience needs to hear,” he says. “I find what is next, and curate the new stuff so that gems don’t get overlooked.”

Jacques’ knack for finding fresh talent comes from years of musical obsession. He was introduced to the world of music at home; his grandfather was a musician in the Cleveland symphony and his uncle, a conductor at the Metropolitan Opera.

“Ironically, my mother is deaf,” Jacques laughs. “Which is honestly a huge part of how I got into music.” When his mother would send Jacques to bed, he would bring the radio with him. “I was addicted to staying up late and listening to the top 100 countdowns,” he says.

Maybe it was the late nights with music beating beneath his sheets, or shouldering records across Europe and Central America, or maybe it’s just hereditary, but Jacques holds a natural inclination for musicians on the rise.

On Feb. 18, Jacques hosts Grammy-nominated group Los Rakas (pictured), a band melting Spanish beats and lyrics into Oakland-style hip-hop. As with every Monday concert, expect a night filled with “edutainment.”

Night Moves

0

“Who are you?”

That’s the opening line from Laura Eason’s Sex with Strangers, running now through Feb. 17 at Left Edge Theatre. It’s a question that lingers throughout the Diane Bailey–directed production.

In the good ol’ days, getting to know someone meant hanging out, dating, talking on the phone for hours, etc. With the advent of the cell phone and social media, these days you get to “know” someone via a Google search and a look at a person’s Facebook or Instagram accounts.

But is a person’s online presence a true reflection of that person or is it simply a persona crafted for the medium? As Shakespeare said, “One man in his time plays many parts.”

What part is Ethan (Dean Linnard) playing when he happens to run into his literary idol Olivia (Sandra Ish) at a lakeside retreat? Is he the young, cocky misogynist behind the Sex with Strangers blog that documented 52 weeks of sexual conquests, or is he the sensitive, thoughtful scribe now seeking to be taken seriously as a writer? Is it really just a chance encounter between him and Olivia, or is there something nefarious going on?

Ostensibly, he’s there for the same reasons as Olivia. He’s there to write. He needs to deliver a screenplay based on the bestselling books compiled from his blog. Olivia, who basically gave up writing after the failure of her first novel, continues to write but only for herself. She’s retreated to the safety of academia, unable to fathom a return to the literary world.

Snowbound in a rural cottage and cut off from the world (no WiFi), what’s there to do but talk and, eventually, have sex? In between the bouts of coitus, they get to know each other with Ethan insisting he’s really not the person he portrayed himself as on his blog—OK, he is, but he won’t be to Olivia—and he wants to help bring Olivia back into the literary fold. Will Olivia succumb to his charms? And who is charming who?

Credulity is strained throughout Eason’s story, but if you buy into the premise, it’s a rather interesting tale. While often funny, there’s a dark current running beneath it all buttressed by the ambiguity of the ending.

Linnard and Ish do well with their multilayered characters. By the show’s conclusion, we still don’t know who they really are, which makes sense, because they don’t either.

Rating (out of 5): ★★★★

Parenting Below the Poverty Line

0

The weight of living as a low-income single mother can be crushing. Surviving below the poverty line (i.e., no savings to dip into or family members to borrow money from) can mean spending every waking second hustling to simply scrape by.

The type of soul-sucking poverty that one can’t see a way out of—drinking coffee to quell hunger because you have to choose between feeding yourself or feeding your kid—can feel like a constantly shifting puzzle, never quite fully constructed and constantly at risk of collapse. Each bit of income, every expense, and each spare moment, is held in a fine balance. Faced with an unexpected expense like a car repair can mean going without meals, losing gas money and therefore missing more desperately needed work shifts, and risking water or electricity being shut off.

It can feel like running uphill through mud. In the dark. With no cash to buy batteries for your flashlight.

In Maid: Hard Work, Low Pay and a Mother’s Will to Survive (Hachette Books), Stephanie Land carries readers through the exhaustion of living below the poverty line. The memoir paints a candid picture of parenting while poor, and the stigma of being a public-assistance recipient in “pull up your bootstraps” America.

“People who have lived in poverty or very low income, they’re always scrambling for the next thing,” says Land by phone from her home in Montana. “I think it’s just ingrained in you to not really relax, because you’re always looking at the next thing and what you can do to keep the income coming in.”

And Land certainly knows a thing or two about scrambling. “As a poor person, I was not accustomed to looking past the month, week, or sometimes hour. I compartmentalized my life in the same way I cleaned every room of every house—left to right, top to bottom,” she writes.

As a young mother, Land fled an abusive relationship and found herself and her infant daughter Mia in a homeless shelter. From there she trudged along a rocky maze of transitional housing, community college, countless mounds of paperwork for public assistance like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, what used to be known as “food stamps”), low-income housing and a stint as a landscaper before arriving in a drafty studio apartment that she paid for by cleaning houses.

Land first published a story about her house-cleaning experiences for Vox in 2015. The viral essay, “I Spent 2 Years Cleaning Houses. What I Saw Makes Me Never Want to Be Rich,” eventually led to a proposal for Maid. The book takes a deeper look at the issues addressed in the Vox story, and chronicles Land’s long hours of schlepping mop buckets and cleaning supplies into the homes of relatively wealthy strangers.

Land describes the sometimes eerie sense that settles across an empty home that maids visit for deep cleanings. The owners know little to nothing about the cleaners; many didn’t even know Land’s name. She was like a ghost to them. Yet, after spending up to three hours alone in the homes on a regular basis—scrubbing bodily fluids off of bathroom surfaces, tucking sheets into beds and transporting trash to outdoor bins—Land developed an intimate understanding of who the homeowners were and what their lives were like.

She knew how much alcohol they drank and where they stashed their cartons of cigarettes. She knew the types of pornographic magazines they preferred. She knew about their physical and mental-health issues from the various prescription pill bottles lined up in medicine cabinets and clustered on bathroom counters. She knew about their relationships and how much they spent on groceries and household items.

Housecleaning work is physically and sometimes emotionally taxing—there is a reason people hire help to do the cleaning for them: it is really hard work—especially for domestic workers with chronic health issues.

Though I’d never tell my manager about it, nerve damage in my spine prevented me from gripping a sponge or brush with my right, dominant hand. I’d had scoliosis, a condition that made the spine curve from side to side, since I was a kid, but recently due to the cleaning work it had pinched a nerve that went down to my right arm. . . . My left hand took over whenever the right one got too tired, but in those first months of six-hour days, when I got home I could barely hold a dinner plate or carry a bag of groceries.

Most people don’t realize that after paying for a cleaning service, workers themselves often receive close to minimum wage for their labor. Land’s first cleaning jobs in 2009 earned her $8.55 to $10 an hour. For cleaners with only one income-earner at home (and children to support), this clearly isn’t enough to live on; low-wage earners often need the safety net of public assistance to make ends meet.

Yet public assistance can be problematic. Contrary to popular myth, being on public assistance is no easy ride and can be discontinued if paperwork isn’t completed accurately, or if monthly income exceeds the allowed amount—even by a few dollars. Land describes that at one point she was on seven types of assistance, from a low-income energy bill program to low-income housing. The requirements and piles of paperwork were daunting.

And yet despite receiving various sources of government support to fill in financial gaps while working up to 25 hours a week (she wasn’t paid for travel time or for washing her cleaning rags at home), Land still barely kept her head above water. The stigma of her circumstances also brought an unwavering sense of shame; spending a few extra dollars treating herself and her daughter to a meal at a restaurant on a rare occasion made her feel reckless; allowing herself any time to relax evoked guilt and anxiety.

“I think the legislators and the general voting public are obsessed with whether or not poor people work for their benefits, and so I think a lot of the paperwork that’s required is just proving not only how poor you are, but proving how much you do work,” says Land. “Even if you do prove it, you have to prove it even more, on a sometimes monthly basis, and it’s degrading. I don’t think people really understand that part of it either. There’re a lot of things about the system that work against poor people and just make it harder for them.”

[page]

Land points to the proposed changes to the Farm Bill as an example of increased requirements for SNAP benefits. Although Congress voted for an $867 billion Farm Bill in December, just a week later the Trump administration declared that it would continue seeking more stringent regulations on who can receive SNAP benefits, including increasing work requirements for older workers between ages 49 and 59, and for workers with young children ages 6 to 12. The proposed changes would affect over 1 million households nationwide.

The perpetual fear of living with financial instability and working hard—while constantly proving how hard she worked—wasn’t the only thing that weighed on Land. In Maid, she opens up about living in a state of shame for receiving benefits, and the stereotypes and resentment often projected on to poor people, even by friends. She describes people commenting with snide voices, “You’re welcome” when they’d spot her using food stamps at the checkout line.

“It seemed like certain members of society looked for opportunities to judge or scold poor people for what they felt we didn’t deserve,” Land writes. “They’d see a person buying fancy meats with an EBT card and use that as evidence for their theory that everyone on food stamps did the same.”

For many, the mere idea of public assistance certainly evokes stereotypes and raises questions about who deserves help (and for those that are deemed worthy of help, how much support they deserve also comes into question). And of course, there’s a classist assumption that all moms use their food stamps strictly to buy junk food for their kids, which Land—unapologetically—said she did on special occasions.

“I used to do that for Christmas. I bought candy with food stamps,” she says. “I used to buy treats for my kid because that was all I could get her. I couldn’t afford to get her a toy or a lot of stuff, but I could buy her a piece of candy with food stamps. To me, I’m giving my child a moment of joy.”

In addition to the stress of financial insecurity and the grueling, often degrading experience of scrubbing other people’s toilets that Land addresses in Maid, she offers a glimpse into the isolation she often felt raising Mia alone:

Sometimes just walking behind a two-parent family on a sidewalk could trigger shame from being alone. I zeroed in on them—dressed in clothes I could never afford, diaper bag carefully packed into an expensive jogger stroller. Those moms could say things that I never could: “Honey, could you take this?” or “Here, can you hold her for a second?” The child could go from one parent’s arms to the other’s.

Land eventually left Washington and completed her English degree at University of Montana’s creative writing program. She continued cleaning houses until her last year in school, when her second daughter was just a baby. Since graduation, her career path has taken an upward swing; in addition to getting Maid published, Land now works as a full-time writer.

She’s been a fellow at Center for Community Change and the Economic Hardship Reporting Project, and has published in the New York Times, the Washington Post, The Guardian, Salon, The Nation and elsewhere.

“I felt like I had to hold myself accountable to the degree, and I stubbornly kept myself to that—not that there’s anything wrong with side gigs or having to go back into cleaning,” she says.

According to a report issued by the U.S. Census Bureau in September 2018, there are 39.7 million people living in poverty across the country, and based on the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, there are over 900,000 house cleaners nationwide in 2017, earning an average of $11 per hour. Maid takes these impersonal statistics and the topic of income inequality and gives them a face. Her voice represents millions who are attempting to survive on low wages—and reveals the truth of what it’s like for so many single parents struggling to get by, one day at a time:

I would hear the same thing again and again: “I don’t know how you do it.” When their husbands went out of town or worked late all the time, they’d say, “I don’t know how you do it,” shaking their heads, and I always tried not to react. I wanted to tell them those hours without your husband aren’t even close to replicating what it is like to be a single parent, but I let them believe it did. Arguing with them would reveal too much about myself, and I was never out to get anyone’s sympathy. Besides, they couldn’t know unless they felt the weight of poverty themselves. The desperation of pushing through because it was the only option.

Land says her book is succeeding, in part because “people are more apt to listen to someone who is on the other side and who is a success story, and I cringe at that, because the system is not a successful system.”

In a perfect world, Maid would become required reading in schools across the country. In the very least, it should evoke compassion and stir empathy in people who have never walked in Land’s shoes. And hopefully that empathy can lead to big changes in how poor people are treated in America.

“I’m really hoping that my book changes the way people think about the lower classes and working classes,” she says, “and I’m hoping it increases their view of humanity, and gives them more compassion. I hope it sets up the stage for more books like mine to come out, from women of color and from more people in the margins.

“I think the world should be ready to hear from angry poor people.”

High ‘Times’

American views on marijuana have shifted rapidly.

In 1988, only 24 percent of Americans supported legalization. But steadily, the nation began to liberalize. By 2018, 66 percent of Americans offered their approval, transforming marijuana legalization from a libertarian fantasy into a mainstream cause. Why has public opinion changed so dramatically?

In a study published this February, we examined a range of possible reasons, finding that the media likely had the greatest influence.

Our study ruled out a few obvious possibilities. For one, it’s not about marijuana use. Yes, its use has increased—but the increase from 10 percent to 13.5 percent is too small to have had much of an impact on attitudes. And it’s not about generational differences. Younger and older people developed more liberal views about the legalization of marijuana at a similar pace over the last 30 years.

Likewise, the pace of change has been similar across political parties, religions, educational levels, racial and ethnic groups and gender. As of 2016, 67.5 percent of Democrats and 47.6 percent of Republicans think that marijuana should be legal. As politically polarized as the country may seem, when it comes to marijuana, Americans have been changing their attitudes together.

What has likely made the biggest difference is how the media has portrayed marijuana. Support for legalization began to increase shortly after the news media began to frame marijuana as a medical issue. In 1983 and 1984, most articles on marijuana in the New York Times discussed problems related to the drug, such as crime. At that time, the Times was more likely to lump marijuana together in a kind of unholy trinity with cocaine and heroin in discussions about drug smuggling, drug dealers and the like.

During the 1990s, stories discussing marijuana in criminal terms became less prevalent. Meanwhile, the number of articles discussing the medical uses of marijuana slowly increased. Gradually, the stereotypical persona of the marijuana user shifted from the stoned slacker wanting to get high to the aging boomer seeking pain relief.

And, as Americans became more supportive of marijuana legalization, they also increasingly told researchers that the criminal justice system was too harsh—and the proportion of Americans who support legalizing marijuana has closely tracked with the proportion of Americans who think the criminal justice system is too harsh.

Our study found that the news media’s portrayal of marijuana began to change shortly before the public did—suggesting that the media influenced support for the legalization of marijuana.

Whatever the initial impetus, attitudes today are drastically more supportive.

Source: Alternet’s the Conversation. A longer version of this article with details on the study appears on Alternet.com.

Letters to the Editor: February 6, 2019

Quite Good
Poetry

Thanks for publishing the review of the Joni Mitchell concert documentary by Richard von Busack (“Lifesaver,” Jan. 30). Now informed, I will attempt to attend the not-sold-out screening.

But one statement by Mr. von Busack is wrong on two different counts—that Joni “was one of two female performers” in 1978’s Last Waltz, by which it appears he meant the movie, not the original concert, which was filmed in 1976 at Winterland. First, there were two post-concert inserts featured in the movie filmed on sound stages. One featured Emmylou Harris, as noted in the review, but the other featured Mavis Staples, albeit not solo, but as the primary lead singer in this joint vocal and instrumental effort between the Staples Singers and the Band. I found Mavis’ rendition of “The Weight” in the movie unforgettable.

As for the concert itself, Joni was the only lead female performer, period, an omission of fact that, if mentioned, would have strengthened the author’s point about her status as the most important female popular-music artist of her generation.

Finally, I would guess the author didn’t personally attend the Woodstock gathering. Because, as an attendee, I’d say Joni nailed the spirit of the gathering in her song, and thus did not, per the author’s claim, write something “airy-fairy”—at least not in the context of what actually happened there. That not enough folks subsequently lived up to the vision of a better world which was directly espoused at Woodstock does not seem relevant to the merits of the song. I’d say it still captured the moment very well, and thus was quite good poetry.

Tiburon

A Modest
Proposal

In light of PG&E’s proposal for bankruptcy, I would suggest the state of California buy it out. The state is proposing a requirement of all new housing to have solar panels. What would make more sense is if the state would also require installed batteries which would allow it to maintain electricity in case of failure of the electrical grid. This would allow the grid to be shut down in times of severe winds and low humidity, without having to warn people of the immediate danger of fire.

Further, the grid could be enhanced by the conversion to trunk lines to high voltage direct current. This could give the network the ability to be resilient, as all of its points of distribution would be converted into alternating current. At distributive centers it would be possible to place giant batteries such as vanadium flow. These could store electricity for relief in heavily populated areas and facilities that need to remain in operation, such as hospitals, fire stations and police stations.

A smart grid could collect electricity from wherever it is obtained, and can be saved and used where it is needed. The additional advantage of this system is that if one sub-area fails, it would not take down the whole system.

Cotati

Write to us at le*****@******an.com.

Brrrrrrrrrrr

Baby, it's cold outside, but please, let's lay off the denialist snowball posturing—global warming is a very real phenomenon, and there's been lots of action on that critical political front since the November elections. This week, a coalition of California energy providers, local governments and environmental organizations released a policy roadmap outlining a new statewide push to deal with a...

Letters to the Editor: February 13, 2019

Who Will Pay? I agree with Cal Fire Chief Ken Pilmot on banning new homes in fire-prone areas (Open Mic, Jan. 30). But to require 20-foot-wide roads (are you adding the two-foot shoulders to both sides of the 20-foot-wide road—24 feet—or 16-foot-wide roads with shoulders?) for all dead-end roads would be cost-prohibitive. It would cost more to improve an existing...

Very Old Bones

The last time I used, it was 50 years ago, and now I don't know whether to eat it, smoke it or rub it in," a white-haired gentleman complains to Eli Melrod, the co-founder and CEO at Sol, Sebastopol's model dispensary, where one-third of the customers are over 60 years old and half are women. Once upon a time, baby...

Dance of Death

Haunted houses are bad, but what's really frightening is a haunted city. The 2018 remake of Italian horror director Dario Argento's Suspiria—"six acts and an epilogue in divided Berlin"—shows a coven of bloodthirsty witches as just one cadre of plotters in a city riddled with them. It unfolds during the "German Autumn" of 1977, the era of the Red Army Faction,...

Backyard Burgundy

Chuck Easley is no Frenchman, and he's the first to admit it. So why fly the tricolor so high above a funky old truck that marks the road to—hey, isn't that the road to Kaz? Kaz has left the building, I discovered back in 2015 when driving by this rambling little bodega tucked away off Adobe Canyon Road. For over...

In Session

Long-running concert series Monday Night Edutainment (MNE) at HopMonk Tavern in Sebastopol inspires a feeling similar to that of listening to a new album from a band you love: you hear the familiar beats and rhythms, but you also hear new sounds, sometimes surprising and out of character. For DJ Jacques, introducing audiences to new sounds is just as important...

Night Moves

"Who are you?" That's the opening line from Laura Eason's Sex with Strangers, running now through Feb. 17 at Left Edge Theatre. It's a question that lingers throughout the Diane Bailey–directed production. In the good ol' days, getting to know someone meant hanging out, dating, talking on the phone for hours, etc. With the advent of the cell phone and social...

Parenting Below the Poverty Line

The weight of living as a low-income single mother can be crushing. Surviving below the poverty line (i.e., no savings to dip into or family members to borrow money from) can mean spending every waking second hustling to simply scrape by. The type of soul-sucking poverty that one can't see a way out of—drinking coffee to quell hunger because you...

High ‘Times’

American views on marijuana have shifted rapidly. In 1988, only 24 percent of Americans supported legalization. But steadily, the nation began to liberalize. By 2018, 66 percent of Americans offered their approval, transforming marijuana legalization from a libertarian fantasy into a mainstream cause. Why has public opinion changed so dramatically? In a study published this February, we examined a range of...

Letters to the Editor: February 6, 2019

Quite Good Poetry Thanks for publishing the review of the Joni Mitchell concert documentary by Richard von Busack ("Lifesaver," Jan. 30). Now informed, I will attempt to attend the not-sold-out screening. But one statement by Mr. von Busack is wrong on two different counts—that Joni "was one of two female performers" in 1978's Last Waltz, by which it appears he meant...
11,084FansLike
4,446FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow