Self-Publishing

Fine Print

Bootstrap books: Sebsastopol writer and self-publisher Barbara Baer has enjoyed success with Saltwater, Sweetwater, an anthology of local female writers.

Writers do it for themselves in the world of self-publishing

By Marina Wolf

THERE’S A CERTAIN stigma attached to the self-published book in the minds of the masses. “Poor sap,” a bookstore browser might think, should her eyes slip from the glossy cover of the latest New York Times bestseller down to the plain cover of a political sci-fi novel written by a guy from the next town over and spiral-bound at Kinko’s. “Couldn’t make it in the big time.”

But are such snap judgments really fair or accurate? What if the writer waited three years to sign a contract, and then got tired of hoping that the lawyers would finally agree about royalties? Perhaps he was asked to pull the alien sex scene from Chapter 4, upon which the rest of the plot hinges. Maybe he’s the next Kurt Vonnegut, but the world isn’t ready for him.

Or maybe it’s bigger than just one author. After all, the world of publishing has never been kind to the little person, but contemporary trends make getting published harder than ever. The big time is now breathtakingly huge, with advances running into the low millions. But the entities that have made that kind of money possible–the media giants conglomerating at record rates–keep the purse strings pulled tight for all but the biggest blockbusters. As the field constricts from the top down, authors are struggling harder than ever to get their work over the transom. In this environment, self-publishing seems an increasingly rational response.

The point is, there are many reasons–having nothing to do with the objective quality of a given manuscript–an author would choose to go it alone. And as a region thickly populated with literary types, Sonoma County has a writer for every reason.

Dr. Marty Griffin, author, environmentalist, and publisher of Saving the Marin-Sonoma Coast, actually did find editors who wanted to take on his book. But the honest ones told him, “You’ll hate me if I publish it because you’ll have to promote it and you won’t get very much of the returns.”

Griffin self-published because he wanted the book to have a lot of photographs and maps: “Most book publishers wouldn’t put all that in because it would cost them too much,” he says. The end result, a beautiful, thickly illustrated book, has gotten amazing media response in the nine months since its release. It’s sold well, too, considering that Griffin and his one-woman publicity crew weren’t able to place the book in the chain stores until three months ago, when it was picked up by a national distributor.

“They refused to carry it before then,” says Griffin with just a smidgen of satisfaction in his voice. “They said I was just too small a press. And then they started getting requests from Borders and Dalton and Barnes & Noble, so they wrote and said they were excited to get the book.”

Like most authors, self-published or traditional, Griffin does his own publicity at bookstores and benefits all over the North Bay. He calls it “a work of love, not money,” which is a good thing, because Griffin isn’t even close to breaking even on his investment of over $100,000.

Few self-publishers have to spend that kind of dough–the more common outlay is between $5,000 and $10,000. But forget the money: Publicity is the big problem, as Barbara Baer, one of the prime movers behind the anthologies Cartwheels on the Faultline and Saltwater, Sweetwater, is discovering.

“I’m doing publicity that I never thought I’d do,” she says with a rueful laugh, mentioning real estate welcome baskets and review copies to Working Assets, a long-distance company.

Cartwheels on the Faultline, the first anthology put out by Baer’s Floreant Press in 1997, was written by members of the writing group she belonged to, and the work that emerged was so specifically local that self-publishing seemed the natural next step.

“I was surprised that it did so well,” confesses Baer. “I thought of it as a homegrown product that would be lovely for us and for our friends and families.”

Cartwheels enjoyed a very successful run; Saltwater, too, has broken even. However, the problems of publicity and distribution have snowballed, and after two books Baer is ready to step away from samizdat, at least for a while. She’s got her own work to publish, and it won’t be through Floreant Press.

“I don’t want to try to sell myself,” she says firmly. “I’m quite happy doing it with these collections because there’s a purpose there and lots of help and it’s really communal, but I don’t want to do it for myself.”

Sonoma writer Kathleen Hill also found distribution to be the hardest part of self-published success with her guidebooks to Sonoma Valley and Victoria and Vancouver, B.C.

“I set up nice relationships with several distributors, but we had no distribution east of the western states, so when we got national publicity, the book wasn’t in stores when people wanted them,” she says.

The two books were recently picked up, and more titles were requested, by Globe Pequot, a travel book publisher on the East Coast that started out as a self-publishing venture 20 years ago. Still, Hill is ready to return to self-publishing at any time.

“My personal position is that if Globe Pequot doesn’t want to do a book that I want to do, I’m gonna do it myself,” she says.

WHATEVER their reasons for self-publishing, a lot of authors are doing it. The Small Publishers Association of North America–born just two and a half years ago–already claims over 1,100 members. Last year more than 7,000 new publishers started up, according to SPAN statistics, and most of them were self-publishers.

On the local level, Jim Colvin gets to meet many of these literary optimists. As consignment buyer for all six Copperfield’s Books stores, Colvin is responsible for the 300 or so titles–mostly cookbooks, children’s books, and novels–sitting on the local authors’ shelves. Some authors object to that placement, says Colvin: “They don’t really want to be in that section. They want to be wherever their subject is. They want to be over with the rest of the books.”

“Most of the people I work with really have big dreams of being successful,” he continues. “They don’t want to appeal just to the small subgroup that they might be a part of. They really want to be national bestsellers.”

Take Linda Ward, a Santa Rosa author who received over 30 rejections of her book Choosing before deciding to self-publish; even now, she still sends the book to publishers in hopes of getting it picked up. A modest paperback, Choosing is an interactive, “choose-your-own-adventure” novel about a young woman’s sexual choices. According to Copperfield’s figures, the book is selling moderately well. But Ward wants more.

“I want national exposure, because as far as I’m concerned this is a book that should be used in the schools,” says Ward, who even sent her book to Oprah–“Everyone sends their book to Oprah, probably.”

Ironically, Ward has just taken a job teaching pregnant teenagers and teenage mothers: “I love these young women, but I wish they’d have read my book!” she says. Butshe hesitates only for a second when asked why she went the self-publishing route.

“I doubt I would have got it into print if I hadn’t self-published, not without a whole lot more work on my part. And I just frankly couldn’t afford to do any more than I did,” she says. “But it’s thrilling to finally see something come to completion.”

From the November 25-December 2, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

The Scoop

Who Shot JFK?

By Bob Harris

I had no idea what to write this week. Then tonight I’m onstage for two hours doing my odd little comedy/research JFK assassination piece for about 300 people in Indiana, ranting and joking about the CIA the whole time, when this weird old guy in a turquoise bolo tie and false teeth too large for his head stands up and announces that he has the Truth about the whole thing. Cool. I guess I can just go home then.

Poligrip Man then hands out a xerox of his homemade flier identifying the [21] shots fired in Dealey Plaza–apparently it was both a murder and a military salute–all by a lone gunman: not Oswald, but George DeMohrenschildt, a CIA informant and spooky dude for sure, but plainly not the assassin, although he was a personal friend of George Bush. But I digress.

And since “my” version (which is simply a recounting of cool declassified documents, not a claimed solution for the shooting itself) doesn’t match his, Poligrip Man angrily concludes that I must be working for the CIA as part of the plot.

My God, how I [love] being denounced as a spy. You should try it. It is [so] cool. So now, here’s this week’s column, since the 35th anniversary is Sunday. Enjoy. Assuming I’m not a government disinformation agent.

Will history record Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin of JFK? One word: Scoreboard. A new Roper survey done in cooperation with the History Channel cable TV network says that 73 percent of Americans think JFK was definitely or probably killed by a conspiracy.

Which is the same thing as saying three-quarters of the U.S. believes that for 35 years, the FBI, our Congress, and the Justice Departments of six presidential administrations have failed to do their jobs. And it means that we agree 3-to-1 that the mainstream media, which has clung to a Lone Nut longer than Eva Braun, is completely full of it.

In Washington, the Assassination Records Review Board is disbanding as this goes to press. Convened to expedite the release of government documents in the wake of Oliver Stone’s film on the murder, the AARB has pried loose over 60,000 classified documents, comprising hundreds of thousands of pages, from the CIA, the FBI, and other agencies.

The AARB’s final report scolds all of the above for “needlessly and wastefully” withholding records for decades. Even so, some remaining blacked-out passages in some pages will not be released until as late as 2017.

If you believe the national press, there’s nothing significant in any of those documents.

So is there anything new in the JFK assassination? Yup.

Thanks to declassified documents new and old, here’s just a smidge of the real and jumbled history that honest researchers are trying to understand:

Oswald’s “defection” to the Soviet Union

Oswald received training in the Russian language while in the military. Oswald’s superior officer in the Marines clearly knew that Oswald was going to the Soviet Union immediately after his discharge. Instead of the usual ID card, Oswald was given a DD 1173, issued to U.S. employees about to work overseas.

While in the Soviet Union, Oswald told a writer named Priscilla Johnson that someone had prepared him for two years before his defection. He wouldn’t say whom, although he later slipped in a radio debate and said he was under the protection of the U.S. government, a slip he quickly caught and recanted.

(For her part, Priscilla Johnson, a reporter whose role in constructing the Oswald story has led many researchers to speculate she was somehow a CIA asset — which she denies strongly — worked for the OSS during World War II, applied to work for the CIA in 1952, and was described by the CIA in 1956 as of “operational interest.”)

Throughout, CIA counterintelligence officers intentionally created false and conflicting reports about Oswald, in all likelihood as part of a “barium meal,” the planting of phony records to trace a leak, whether to the KGB, the press, or another intelligence agency. Meanwhile, Oswald was placed on the CIA Security Office’s “Watch List” of people whose mail the CIA opened illegally in a highly classified program code-named HT/LINGUAL.

The mail-opening is very likely related to the barium meal, but the exact operational relationship isn’t fully clear.

In New Orleans, summer 1963

Oswald claimed (falsely) to be a member of the pro-Castro activist group the Fair Play for Cuba Committee (FPCC) precisely as both the CIA and FBI undertook counterintelligence operations against the group, in an effort to smear the FPCC as being under KGB or Cuban control.

According to statements from numerous witnesses, Oswald was paid to pose as a member of the FPCC by Guy Banister, a former FBI field office chief currently surviving as an anti-communist private detective and gunrunner. Many of Oswald’s leaflets had Banister’s office address stamped right on them. In addition, the handouts were not the current FPCC leaflets, but an earlier edition, much of the print run of which had been purchased in bulk by the CIA.

Oswald made contact with members of the DRE, an extreme anti-Castro group supervised by David Atlee Phillips of the CIA. The DRE members suspected Oswald of being an FBI infiltrator. A confrontation with DRE members led to Oswald’s arrest, generating publicity and a paper trail for Oswald as a pro-Castro activist. The arresting officer believed that the incident was staged.

Oswald also tried to infiltrate a peace group at Tulane University.

The DRE member with whom Oswald scuffled, Tulane’s President, and the owners of the radio and TV stations that publicized Oswald were all involved in an anti-Castro propaganda operation called the Information Council of the Americas, or INCA, which received funds and support from the CIA.

Before the shooting

Six weeks before the murder, CIA Counterintelligence officials in Mexico City doctored and falsified documents concerning Oswald, linking him to an alleged KGB assassination specialist, but in a fashion that would not alert the FBI’s security.

Congressional investigators concluded over 20 years ago that Oswald was impersonated at the Cuban and Soviet embassies in Mexico City before the assassination.

After the shooting

Numerous false but well-informed stories linking Oswald (and later, entire assassination teams) to Castro were circulated by individuals who worked for the CIA in trying to overthrow Castro.

A researcher for the House Select Committee on Assassinations examined the stories originating in Mexico City and Miami, and virtually every single source had worked for the CIA’s David Atlee Phillips, a propaganda specialist and advisor to the DRE, who was, coincidentally, cross-posted to both Mexico City and Miami.

After the shooting, the CIA’s E. Howard Hunt (a close friend of Phillips) helped circulate the tapes of Oswald put together by INCA and the DRE, working to create a public image of Oswald as a Castro agent, and thereby justifying a renewed invasion of Cuba.

The CIA officers responsible for falsifying the Oswald record prior to the assassination were not disciplined; instead, they were assigned by CIA Deputy Director of Plans Richard Helms to key roles in the CIA’s “investigation” of the murder.

The Dallas investigation

The “magic bullet” now in the National Archives is not the one found in Parkland Hospital. The testimony of the first three men to handle the actual bullet agrees: the real one was long and pointed, instead of the rounded Mannlicher-Carcano bullet known as Commission Exhibit 399.

The rifle found in the Book Depository was clearly and immediately identified by several on the scene as a 7.65 mm Mauser rifle, a very different gun from the Mannlicher-Carcano that could be linked to Oswald and which became the official weapon. We now know that the FBI received a 7.65 mm shell found in Dealey Plaza, the existence of which was suppressed for 32 years.

Oswald was seen entering the Book Depository on the morning of the assassination carrying a package. Officially, it contained a rifle, although it wasn’t large enough for any such thing, and Oswald insisted it merely contained curtain rods, although officially no such item was ever discovered. In recently released Dallas police files is an unreleased photograph of… curtain rods, dusted for fingerprints.

The autopsy

No explanation yet exists for the fact that the official version of JFK’s wounds is at utter variance with the near-unanimous version of JFK’s wounds witnessed by no less than 46 individuals in Dallas, many of them trained medical personnel.

However, the technicians who took JFK’s X-rays and autopsy photographs have denied to investigators that the official photos are the ones they took.

Several witnesses to the Bethesda autopsy indicate that another whole bullet was found.

The Warren Commission

In a phone call one day after the assassination, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover told Lyndon Johnson: “The case against Oswald, as it now stands, isn’t strong enough to be able to get a conviction.” However, the next day, the FBI memoed the White House: “The thing I’m most concerned about is having something issued so we can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin.”

And the White House responded: “A high-level committee is the only way to silence debate.”

Transcripts of Warren Commission interviews with witnesses were submitted to the FBI for “editing and corrections.” Often, the resulting changes distorted or even contradicted the original testimony.

Robert Kennedy had sufficient doubts about the Mexico City episode that he investigated it personally (if secretly), even visiting Mexico City himself following the release of the Warren Report.

Since the founding of the AARB

The Secret Service has admitted to shredding two boxes of records on their protective operations during the JFK administration.

Make of all this what you will. There’s plenty more, but you get the idea. The comforting idea that Oswald acted alone, that the FBI and CIA did their jobs, and that the media reported the truth, is now only slightly more plausible than Poligrip Man’s 21-gun salute. But what do I know? I’m just a CIA disinformation agent.

You just gotta get publicly denounced sometime. Really. It’s cool.

Web extra to the November 25-December 2, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Windsor INS Raids

Coyotes & Campesinos

United they stand: Kim Caldeway and Alicia Sanchez of Pueblos Unidos object to Windsor police involvement in raids.

Immigrants protest Windsor INS raids

By Dylan Bennett

ON THE HUNT for coyotes, a team of federal agents from the Immigration and Naturalization Service, accompanied by Windsor police, entered three Windsor residences, pistols drawn, late at night in early September.

Instead of “coyotes”–the term for those who smuggle illegal immigrants from Mexico to the United States–the agents reportedly found only illegal farm workers, 17 of whom were arrested, and 10 deported to Mexico.

The families affected by the raid quickly contacted Pueblos Unidos, the local immigrants’ rights group, which arranged for a community meeting with Windsor Police Chief David Cedarholm last month to protest the involvement of local police, the lack of an arrest warrant and Miranda warnings, the fear produced by unholstered weapons, and the INS’ discouraging detainees from seeking legal counsel.

Two weeks ago Pueblos Unidos organizers Alicia Sanchez and Kim Caldeway accompanied two Mexican women from the raided home to the monthly meeting of the Sonoma County Commission on Human Rights at the county administration center, where immigrants told of confronting the INS and local police. “The police came and knocked on my door. They told me to open it. I asked them for a warrant, but they said no, it wasn’t necessary,” a teenage woman explained in Spanish. “I asked them again. They said ‘We don’t need one. If you don’t open the door, we will knock it down.’

“They took us outside and asked us a lot of questions, and then they said they were INS. They asked us to raise our hands. I asked them why. We are not criminals. They took my father and brother. I felt angry and sad.”

The young woman with dramatic, long, shiny black hair, dressed in a T-shirt and jeans, spoke softly without interruption. Two weeks before, in front of a packed school auditorium at the community meeting with Cedarholm, she had choked on her own emotions, her face contorting in an odd grin that suppressed her tears as she attempted to tell her story.

That evening, about 100 angry members of the local Mexican community, along with representatives from Pueblos Unidos, the ACLU, and Amnesty International, told Cedarholm what they considered the worst part about the INS raid: the participation of two Windsor cops. “Pueblos Unidos wants no cooperation between the INS and Windsor police,” Sanchez told the approving audience.

Such cooperation, she argues, poisons the trust between citizens and police by involving local officers with INS operations said to be lacking in due process.

“The INS has a reputation of abusive conduct and disregard for equal treatment,” says Judith Volkart, head of the local ACLU.

INS enforcement official James Christensen says administrative law, not criminal law, covers the arrest of illegal immigrants, so that constitutionally mandated warrants, Miranda warnings, and legal defense at public defense are not required.

The local INS raids coincided with the October release of a major report on immigration enforcement by the National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights that presents five key findings that may apply in the Windsor case. The report concluded that INS raids: violate constitutional and civil rights; destabilize families; undermine fair wages and safe working conditions; and do not significantly affect migration patterns.

And, the report concludes, INS collaboration with local cops seriously undermines community trust. At the community meeting, Cedarholm conceded this was true to some degree.

The report–Portrait of Injustice: the Impact of Immigration Raids on Families, Workers, and Communities–is the collaboration of 150 groups nationwide, including Pueblos Unidos, and is based on documentation from 235 raids in 31 states.

Although the report calls for the total elimination of INS raids, it also documents a growing trend of increased INS enforcement funding and recent jumps in the number of deportations. Since the start of the Clinton administration, the report says, the total INS funding has doubled. In 1993, the INS deported over 42,000 people. By last year that number had jumped to nearly 113,000, with deportation goals increasing each year.

INS officials say there was a total of nearly 2,410 deported illegal immigrants and 530 voluntary returns in fiscal year 1998 in the San Francisco District, which stretches from Bakersfield to the Oregon border, or about four-fifths of the state.

Assistant District Director of Enforcement Mark Reardon reacted strongly when asked about the findings of the immigration report. “These are just baseless, groundless allegations they throw up now and then just to see how you react. Quite frankly, after you see it so many times you tend to overlook it altogether.”

PROTESTERS claim INS raids generate a climate of fear in which kids are afraid to go to school, the elderly don’t venture from their home, and crimes against immigrants are not reported. “Just as I cannot teach a hungry child, I cannot teach a child who is afraid,” says public school teacher Fernando Nugent.

“The first question of Latino victims of violence is, ‘Will I be deported?'” says women’s rights activist Tanya Brannan. “But Latinos are not only victims of crime, they are witnesses to crime. These raids undermine the security of the community.”

INS spokesperson Sharon Rummery says the Windsor police provided merely a “courtesy” escort to protect the INS agents. Local cops commonly help find addresses for INS agents working in unfamiliar territory, she adds, claiming the Windsor police did not provide intelligence for the September raid.

Rummery also says those arrested in Windsor were probably “removed” rather than “deported.” She notes that returning to the United States illegally after being officially deported is a federal crime punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

Although Cedarholm would not agree to keeping his officers out of future INS operations, the September raids remain an important case for Pueblos Unidos, mainly because so few INS raids come under public scrutiny. “We always hear a lot of anecdotal information, but we very rarely have been able to make contact with the people involved, get their testimonies, go to a lawyer, go to the Human Rights Commission, really kind of follow through, and then do some grassroots organizing with them,” says Kim Caldeway of Pueblos Unidos.

After the dust from the election has settled, Caldeway says her group will assist local families with asking the Windsor Town Council for a resolution against future INS raids.

Cedarholm has asked the INS to provide him with a clear mission statement for future raids, to bring a warrant, and to follow up with a written or verbal report. “I still maintain that we need to be there,” says Cedarholm. “I wouldn’t want a function taking place without our presence if something bad did happen. Or if we had a situation where people were running from a house or being pursued. I want our guys there to know what’s up so I can anticipate the calls we could get, the miscommunication, misinformation. And we have a serious officer safety concern.”

And there are legitimate complaints about immigrants in the area, he adds. Some Windsor residents have identified certain residences that create a public disturbance, Cedarholm says, by having too many people living in one house during the harvest season.

“The law says that if you are here illegally, you can and will be removed,” says INS spokesperson Rummery. “I know there are a lot of people who don’t like that law, but the way to change it is legislatively. We have no choice but to enforce the law.”

Not lost on critics of the raids is the contradiction of local police helping deport undocumented Mexican farmworkers who are hired in large numbers, especially at harvest time, to fuel the agricultural economy of Sonoma County.

“Police should protect us. We are here to work,” said a middle-aged Mexican woman during the meeting with Cedarholm. “Get the drug dealers, don’t get the workers.”

From the November 19-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

The Inn of the Beginning

0

The Inn Crowd

Inn of the Beginning turns 30

By Charles McDermid

IN THE BEGINNING, Greg Cochrane simply needed some rest. It was 1968 and Cochrane was holding what his close friend and fellow Sonoma State University student David McNair recalls as “a permanent party going on all summer. He said that if he was ever going to get some sleep he had to move the party.”

Simple enough. Cochrane, 22, rented the space of a defunct Italian restaurant in downtown Cotati, and on Sept. 28, 1968, his summertime bash became the original incarnation of the Sonoma County entertainment institution The Inn of the Beginning.

“I gave it the name because it was a new beginning for a lot of people who really had nothing else going for them,” says Cochrane, who does say he thought of the club’s title while on LSD. “We wanted to keep things friendly and localized and play really soulful music.”

Thirty years later, those goals remain intact. Cochrane’s core philosophy has been retained and refreshed by a string of owners leading to the current trio of Miranda Fredrick, Scott Wagner, and Scott Goree, former owner of Magnolias in Santa Rosa. “[The Inn] has always been the heart of the Cotati scene for music and art. And for its youthfulness and exploration and optimism. It’s also the social gathering place and the heart of the North Bay musical community,” remarks Frank Hayhurst, former co-operator of the Inn, member of the Bronze Hog (the first band to grace the stage at the Inn), and owner of Zone Music in Cotati. “Cotati’s personality is defined by the club.”

Cultural landmark status aside, the Inn’s most impressive feature is its past and present commitment to live music–all of which will be celebrated this weekend when the Inn marks its anniversary with a celebration that will feature, among others, the Legendary Bronze Hog.

“We all enjoyed music and we wanted a venue for ourselves,” says Cochrane.

Citing “burnout,” Cochrane sold the club in 1970 to Ward Maillard (son of a U.S. congressman and Sonoma County artist Elizabeth Quandt). Maillard, who once spent months building a gigantic rock and fiberglass urinal, lost interest after several years and in 1974 sold the Inn to his manager, Mark Braunstein, a former roadie for Janis Joplin. “I had a lot of pride in the club, and what I really liked was presenting new music and exposing the audience to music they would’ve not normally heard,” says Braunstein, whose connections in the music industry and knowledge of production attracted many big-name acts to the local club scene.

“It’s remarkable the people that were coming through the doors in those early days,” remembers Cotati Mayor Richard Cullinen, who tended bar at the Inn in the mid-70s. “Van Morrison popped in frequently and Neil Young was there. I used to sit down and talk to Jerry Garcia when he played there with Merl Saunders.”

Considering the size of the venue, the list of acts that have taken the stage in Cotati is staggering. For instance, the Grateful Dead played every Tuesday for a while, trying out new material on a live audience. Neil Young played unannounced one night for a case of beer and some pizza. A fledgling Jackson Browne was denied an audition after he admitted he was from Orange County. Ramblin’ Jack Elliott introduced a young Arlo Guthrie, who then graced listeners with the first-ever stage performance of his classic “Driving into Los Angeles.” According to Cochrane, Janis Joplin reunited for a short set with Big Brother and the Holding Company just months before her passing.

Waylon Jennings played the Inn. So did New Age pianist George Winston, the psychobilly Cramps, Jefferson Airplane, country artists Ricky Skaggs and Hank Williams Jr., the legendary New Orleans band the Meters, zydeco king Clifton Chenier, bluegrass giant Doc Watson, R&B diva Etta James, and folk queen Joan Baez. The list of bluesmen who made the scene is remarkable in itself: Lightnin’ Hopkins, Bukka White, Clarence “Gatemouth” Brown, Brownie McGhee, Sonny Terry, Junior Wells, Buddy Guy, Taj Mahal, and John Lee Hooker.

Braunstein ran the Inn until 1982, when he merged with downtown rival the Cotati Cabaret to form the lengthy-titled but short-lived Inn of the Beginning at the Cotati Cabaret. He left the old building at 8201 Redwood Highway amid a leasing dispute, and the Inn lay silent for years.

AFTER FAILED STINTS earlier in the decade as an antique store, a bookstore, and a beer-vending coffehouse, the Inn is back as a fixture of downtown Cotati. A year ago, Fredrick and Goree gained managerial control of the Inn and, together with longtime sound technician Randy Teaford, have since infused the club with the same creative energy that once fueled founders Cochrane and Braunstein.

While the Inn may no longer have access to the big names it once did, it has become a vital steppingstone for local acts. Virtually no homegrown band can emerge from Sonoma County without having played the Inn.

“If people are playing in garages, it doesn’t help anyone. The main thing is providing a place for people to play [in public],” says co-owner Goree, who began coming to the Inn in 1968 as an SSU student.

Co-owner Fredrick, formerly known as DJ Lili Pond on KFGY (92.9FM), adds, “We have great nights here with local talent. The Inn is a great launching pad and it’s home to a lot of bands.”

Goree and Fredrick’s booking philosophy presents a different musical style nearly every night of the week. “Around here you simply can’t concentrate on one type of music or demographic,” adds Goree. “You have to mix it up with different shows. Places that exist as solely blues clubs or punk clubs are very short-lived.”

Indeed, the Inn is a smaller act’s dream.

“The vibe is what really makes this place work. It’s in rooms like ours where music really happens. You realize that you’re lucky to be so close you can check out a performer’s dental work,” says Teaford. “Our history and the casual yet efficient way of producing shows have made our reputation.”

The Inn of the Beginning celebrates its 30th anniversary with a local band showcase Saturday, Nov. 21, at 7 p.m. 8201 Old Redwood Hwy., Cotati. Admission is $5. 662-1100.

From the November 19-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Talking Pictures

0

Bombing Out

Get me out of here: Is that Denzel Washington fleeing the set of The Siege?

Two action novelists take on ‘The Siege’

By David Templeton

David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This time around, he journeys to Sacramento–the hometown of authors Richard Herman and William P. Wood–for an afternoon matinee of the big-budget action-thriller The Siege.

FUNNY, but somehow when I sat down in the theater with Richard Herman and William P. Wood, I never anticipated that they’d end up in recurring fits of boyish giggles. This from a former Air Force major (Herman), the best-selling author of numerous testosterone-fueled action novels, and a retired deputy district attorney (Wood), with his own string of white-knuckle crime thrillers.

Honestly, these guys don’t strike one as the giggling type. Then again, some movies are so dumb that a good giggle is the only logical response.

About halfway through The Siege–in which freedom-loving FBI agent Denzel Washington crosses swords with evil Army Gen. Bruce Willis in an attempt to squash a New York City bombing campaign perpetrated by Arab terrorists–enough dumb plot twists and make-believe nonsense have piled up that any intelligent viewer would be hard-pressed to resist a disbelieving snort or two.

Terrorist bombings, it is explained, always come in fours. Yeah, right.

When a bomb-carrying truck drives over the sidewalk and through the front window of a thoroughly unprotected Federal Building, Wood merrily mutters, “Hah!” as the screen ignites in a noisy kaboom of flames. “Oh come on, where’s the concrete barrier?” he’d like to know. Herman, during a silly sequence involving Washington’s improbable evasion of an army surveillance squad, just smiles and shakes his head. The giggle factor only gets worse by the film’s unlikely ending, at which point my two guests have been brought to the brink of hysterics.

In fairness, some of my guests’ mirth is generated by little things that the movie gets right. A remark about the CIA making mistakes all the time draws a bellow of appreciative laughter and a line about a U.S. “policy shift”–an event that leaves a group of Palestinian double agents in the lurch without protection–is received with ironic amusement. “Oh no!” gasps Herman. “Not the dreaded policy shift!” (More on that later.)

It is certain that others will not find The Siege quite so laughable. Its depiction of hate crimes against Arab-Americans, the imposition of martial law on NYC, and the subsequent internment of Arab-American citizens are certainly chilling. In fact, several anti-defamation groups have accused the film itself of being racist, making claims that the Arab characterizations are stereotypical and mean-spirited. Nothing to laugh about there.

“But you see, Bill and I have both seen how government operates close up,” explains Herman after the show. “So we’re in a position to see the humor that others might miss.”

Not to mention knowing their way around a good, believable plot: Each author–both residents of Sacramento, they’ve become friends and staunch supporters over the years–has been praised for the realism of their work. Wood is known as the author of The Bone Garden (based on the case of Dorothea Fuentes, whom Wood successfully prosecuted). His new book, Quicksand, is one of his best: a taut, intelligent thriller about husband and wife crime-fighters on opposite sides of their own terrorist conspiracy. Herman’s books–geopolitical potboilers of the highest order–include Warbirds, Power Curve, and the just-released Against All Enemies, in which two downed U.S. pilots are put on trial in Sudan after a failed bombing run on a chemical weapons plant. Ironically, the title Against All Enemies was once announced as the title of The Siege.

“I’m really glad they changed the name of the movie,” Herman says, as we all slide into a booth at a popular hamburger place. “I would have hated to have been linked to this thing by having the same name.”

“So, was there a point to this movie?” he asks. They both turn to me for an answer.

“Well, the posters all carry the phrase ‘Freedom is History,'” I tell them. “I assume they were trying to make a statement about the price of freedom and the possibility of those freedoms as the world becomes increasingly dangerous.”

HERMAN BURSTS out laughing. “Really? Did they accomplish that, do you think?”

“If you like science fiction, yeah, they did,” answers Wood.

“In the movie’s defense,” Herman says, shrugging, “it was fairly entertaining. It was a classic series of setups and payoffs. The backbone of fiction, right. Nice payoff to nice setups.”

“OK,” Wood considers this, “the setups were OK, but the payoffs were phony. And if the payoff is phony, then the picture is phony.”

“Oh, they did a few things right,” Herman says. “The laughable ‘dreaded policy shift,’ for instance. Unfortunately, they hit that one right on the head. That’s real. Honest to God, how many times have we asked our allies to carry the water for us and then left them high and dry?”

“So it hit a few nails on the head,” Wood amiably retorts. “It spent the rest of its time insulting my intelligence. What about the way the military was portrayed? Willis was a one-dimensional bad guy. Another stereotype. I’ve never known a military officer who was anything like that.” Willis, in fact, played the part like a monotone megalomaniac with a cold, soulless, zombie stare.

“I’ve known more than my share of military types,” Herman says. “And Bill’s right. The army guys were stereotypes as much as the evil terrorists and the driven FBI agents. In fact,” he points out, “what emotional impact the film has is had by playing on our prejudices–prejudices against the military as well as against the Arab nations.

“Yet I still go back to my point,” he continues, “that if you take an uncritical eye at this thing, the movie works.”

“Well, I don’t agree,” Wood says, grinning across the table at his old friend, “uncritical eye or not. Then again, I guess I’ve seen worse.”

From the November 19-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Spins

0

Rare Air

Past life: The four-CD John Lennon Anthology cuts close to the bone.

New CDs focus on rarities from Lennon, Springsteen, Stereolab and the John Coltrane Quartet

John Lennon Anthology Capitol/EMI

DURING a decade-long solo career, John Lennon distanced himself from his Beatles past and left behind an intimate recorded legacy that chronicled his often turbulent personal life. His widow and longtime collaborator, Yoko Ono, has compiled and artfully designed this four-CD collection of rarities–including numerous personal recordings that have never been bootlegged, and a 60-page booklet written by Ono and Rolling Stone writer Anthony DeCurtis–thoughtfully capturing Lennon in many of his most private moments. There are demos and outtakes from his earliest solo work, including alternate takes from the raw, politically charged 1971 New York City concert, which served as Lennon’s coming-out party, and lots of revealing behind-the-scenes stuff taped during 1974’s infamous Lost Weekend that found a bedraggled and estranged Lennon on an extended bender and recording with the world’s fussiest producer, the legendary Phil Spector, who manages even to one-up Lennon’s outrageous behavior (the session includes an instructive cover of the Ronettes “Be My Baby,” complete with step-by-step layering of the patented Spector wall of sound). There’s a heart-tugging moment in which Lennon’s 3-year-old son Sean sings a lyric from “A Little Help from My Friends,” announcing that it’s his favorite song and catching his famous father (who co-wrote the lyric) unable to recall the title. And another in which Lennon, who at the time was supposed to have hung up his guitar and settled into domestic life at his New York City apartment, bangs out a biting and bawdy parody of Bob Dylan’s “Gotta Serve Somebody” (retitled “Serve Yourself”) for a chuckling audience that seems to have been comprised solely of Sean and Ono. Musically, there are many interesting moments here, and historically this document should appeal to any die-hard Beatles fan. The rest of you can sit this one out. GREG CAHILL

Bruce Springsteen Tracks Columbia

BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN’S Tracks, a four-disc set of 56 unreleased songs and 10 B-sides, sets the highest standard yet for what boxed sets can achieve. Superstar boxes have always held to a gratuitous pattern of offering a “best-of,” plus two or three new recordings. Springsteen instead takes his cue from the only other box by a major artist to break that wasteful pattern, Bob Dylan’s The Bootleg Series Vol. 1-3. But the Boss ups the ante: Where Dylan’s set featured many half-finished or lesser takes of well-known songs, the 56 unreleased songs on Tracks are fully realized works, not just studio leftovers. Springsteen has always created dozens of finished songs he couldn’t fit on his albums, and claims these tracks (many of which have been bootlegged, though a good third of the set has surprised even hardcore collectors) are among the standouts he elected to hold back owing to thematic or stylistic concerns. The result, more or less in chronological order, is a set that does much more than merely summarize a career or underline best-selling albums (though it does include Springsteen’s first recordings–his May 1972 audition tape for Columbia Records and a new track recorded just this past August). For the most part, Tracks is a new statement that highlights subtexts of those earlier albums without referring to them. Twenty-five years of hype may have overtold the story of his working-class realism and rock-romantic traditionalism, but Tracks seems to tell that story for the first time. KARL BYRN

Stereolab Aluminum Tunes Drag City

STEREOLABS’ third extras compilation is both a must-have rarities collection for die-hard Stereolab fans and a perfect introduction to the band for pop-music dilettantes. The set’s two CDs feature 25 songs culled from rare 7-inch B-sides, compilation tracks, and remixes of an entire album, Music for the Amorphous Body Study Center, which Stereolab composed to accompany a New York City art installation. Like all Stereolab releases, the cerebral ear candy on Aluminum Tunes combines sugary European lounge-pop with irreverent analog synth ectoplasm, orchestral flourishes, and long interludes of droning, enveloping, hypnotic washes of almost white noise. An intriguing, multifacted collage and a soothing, escapist sound bath. MICHELLE GOLDBERG

John Coltrane Quartet Ballads MCA Impulse!/Mobile Fidelity

Jazz legend and saxophonist John Coltrane is most revered for his exploratory free jazz that pushed the envelope of the genre before his untimely 1967 death. But two years before Coltrane recorded 1964’s epic tone poem A Love Supreme, achieving status as an existential saint, he laid down a set of melodic, blues-based ballads that rank among the most beautiful works ever committed to tape. This stunning set of standards, digitally remastered and reissued here on a 24k-gold CD, is warm, intimate, and irrepressibly lyrical. Close your eyes and let this reissue transport you to the front row of that timeless cabaret of the mind. As for the ice clinking in the glass, you’ll have to provide that yourself. G.C.

From the November 19-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Medea, the Musical

0

Greek Grins

Triple threat: Coco Boylan, Sheila Groves, and Argo Thompson star in Medea.

Campy ‘Medea’ makes merry

By Daedalus Howell

BRAVISSIMO! The Actors’ Theatre production of Medea, the Musical gets in everything but the, er, kitsch-en sink. This Technicolor cabaret extravaganza, skillfully sutured from a talented sexy cast and playwright-director John Fisher’s hilariously campy script, will make you laugh so hard your face will ache and your seat will be wet (if only because water occasionally splashes from the onstage antics into the audience).

Set at a fictional “Euripides Festival” where a production of Medea is under way, Fisher’s musical is a bawdy, raucous burlesque of the original boy-meets-girl, boy-pisses-girl-off, girl-commits-infanticide story. This Medea successfully braids the threads of Greek mythology, popular culture, and gay camp into an NC-17 comic cat-o’-nine-tails, and then proceeds to whip your butt silly.

Actors’ Theater powerhouse Argo Thompson leads the cast through a cavalcade of backstage shenanigans portraying none other than “Argo”–a gay lampoon of himself struggling to play “Jason,” captain to (prepare for extreme synchronicity) “The Argonauts.” Convolutions abound as the actors portray versions of themselves as actors attempting to portray “characters” in this play within a play.

Also complicating matters are the intrusions of the metaplay’s auteur (played with wonderful panache by Robert Pickett) and his attempts to stage the tragedy as a homoerotic fantasia zealously touting gay empowerment. This does not bode well for the unlikely romantic pairing of Argo and Sheila (a superb Sheila Groves as “herself” playing Medea), who each conspire to bend the show to their own sociopolitical objectives.

Each of the 16 cast members shines brilliantly. Highlights include expert choreographer-performer Cabernet Lazarus’ high-kicking an Emma Peel-meets-Blaxploitation-flick “Afro-dite” dance sequence, macho rockers Matt Bartona and Robert Conard’s reckless driving sprees, and Anthony Martinez’s emotional breakdowns as Argo’s jilted ex.

Comic turns also come when Tim Earls’ pager goes on, Frankie Travis goes down, and Jason Breaw goes off as Aetees, queenly King of Colchis. CoCo Tanner Boylan’s steamy Phaedra, Queen of Athens (who lusts after her son, Hippolytus, played to the homo-hilt by David Costner), adds an extra sensual oomph to the show.

This is a stellar cast that sparkles under Fisher’s crisp direction and surely benefits from his obvious intimacy with the award-winning work (after the stopover at Actors’ Theatre, Fisher and his Medea head for Broadway–seriously).

Droll actor-pianist and musical director Lyle Fisher and percussionist Petra Sperling-Nordqvist escort the players through a spate of song-and-dance numbers culled from the far reaches of popular culture.

Medea, the Musical is a madcap, zippity-Dada, calisthenic marvel. With material of this caliber, it would seem impossible to do it wrong, but AT does it so right that it’s marvelous. Even the gods must be grinning.

Actors’ Theatre performs Medea, the Musical Nov. 13-Dec. 19 at the Luther Burbank Center, 50 Mark West Springs Road, Santa Rosa. $5-$15. 523-4185.

From the November 19-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Thanksgiving Table Wines

0

Feast of Flavors

Michael Amsler



The search for that perfect Thanksgiving table wine

By Bob Johnson

IF THE ANNUAL Thanksgiving Day feast is a “formal” occasion around your house, heaven help you when the time comes to select the accompanying wines. I’ve been trying for years to uncover the “ultimate” Turkey Day vino … one elixir, when sipped between mouthfuls of turkey and candied yams, that melds all of the flavors into a rush of hedonistic gastronomic delight.

It has been a fruitless search. Each year I experiment, and 10 pounds later, I crash and burn in a puff of smoke.

I am the Coyote, and the “ultimate” Thanksgiving wine is the Roadrunner.

(Hmm, maybe if we substitute roadrunner meat for turkey meat, the flavors of the roadrunner would … Oh, sorry. Guess I’m obsessing again.)

So, to summarize, if your family stages a “formal” meal on Turkey Day, you may stop reading now. I can’t help you with the wine. You may as well continue perusing the Independent; maybe a group you like has a concert scheduled at the Luther Burbank Center or McNear’s.

However, if your holiday feast more closely resembles a king’s pig-out, interspersed with heady doses of mirth and merriment, you’ve come to the right place. By extending the theme of overindulgence to the wine, the “ultimate” answer becomes clear: uncork not one, not two, but a whole bunch of bottles … and hide Aunt Martha’s car keys until well into the evening, after the post-bash java has taken effect and she’s ready for the road.

The bottlings that follow (all are local except where otherwise indicated) would make wonderful additions to your holiday table. They are rated on a scale of one to four corks: one cork, no flaws; two corks, good; three corks, excellent; and four corks, add your friendly neighborhood wine critic to the guest list.

Prices are suggested retail or as seen in the marketplace:

Michael Amsler



Gundlach-Bundschu
1997 Gewürztraminer

A rose petal nose and a tart grapefruit flavor lead to a refreshing, slightly spicy finish. Gold medal winner at the San Diego National Wine Competition. $12. 2.5 corks.

Chateau St. Jean
1997 Fumé Blanc

Lush and peachy, with a broad feel on the palate that includes notes of grass, vanilla, and fig. One of the few fumés that would work well as a before-dinner sipper. $9. 3 corks.

De Loach
1997 Chardonnay

First came the winery’s multiple bottlings of zinfandel. Now De Loach is confusing … er, treating us to various designations of chardonnay. The “Sonoma” bottling is the original, however, and still this reporter’s favorite. The 1997 rendition features juicy and ripe flavors of apple and tropical fruit, making it a nice addition to the Turkey Day table or a refreshing and satisfying pre-meal quaff. $15. 3 corks.

Michel-Schlumberger
1997 Pinot Blanc

When does a pinot blanc not taste like a pinot blanc? When winemakers expose this relatively delicate grape to an overabundance of oak contact. M-S may have pushed the oak envelope a bit too far in the past, but not with this vintage. Now a nuance rather than a dominant flavor, the oak in this bottling complements rather than dominates the fruit flavors. $12. 3 corks.

Rosemount Estate
1997 Pinot Noir

No, we haven’t added a 51st state. But this Aussie winery has its U.S. headquarters in Sonoma, so deal with it. This exuberant wine is still a youngster, but its sweet strawberry-jam and bright cherry flavors make it hard to resist. The fruit components are nicely framed by a buttery quality and alluring spice notes. $9.99. 3 corks.

Benziger
1996 Reserve Chardonnay

Lactose intolerant? Stay away. But if you like buttery chardonnays, this one’s is for you. This full-bodied Carneros wine also exudes pear, honey, and spice aromas and flavors. $19.99. 3.5 corks.

David Coffaro
1997 Dry Creek Cuvée

Start with intense black fruit flavors, add a dash of black pepper, and toss in a hint of fennel, and you have this unique bottling from Dry Creek Valley that will stand up to virtually any flavors on the dinner plates. The wine is an unusual combination of cabernet sauvignon, zinfandel, carignane, and petite sirah–a true tribute to the value of blending. $22. 3.5 corks.

Gallo Sonoma
1994 Zinfandel

This Frei Ranch wine has a deeply extracted wild blackberry nose with hints of pepper and allspice. On the palate, a sweet cherry flavor appears and follows through to the finish. Lip-smacking from the moment it touches your mouth until it’s deep in your throat. This is not your father’s Gallo. $11. 3.5 corks.

Nalle
1996 Zinfandel

A highly perfumed, perfectly balanced vino from Dry Creek Valley with spiced berry fruit and powerful vapors of allspice. From one of the world’s leading zin makers, this wine is at once racy and elegant. A special bottling for a special occasion. $19.98. 4 corks.

From the November 19-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

The Scoop

Death Race 2000

By Bob Harris

SO ON NOV. 3 we good citizens all traipsed down to the ballot box and exercised our democratic muscles by voting for the millionaire of our choice. Yippee. News coverage across the land exalted the holy ritual, airing man-on-the-street interviews with exiting voters who decried their non-voting fellow citizens as slackers and layabouts who shirk their civic duty and so deserve neither complaint nor quarter. Yuh-hunh.

And so now once again the tide of 30-second televised deceptions that so rudely cake mud over our Dawson’s Creek reruns will recede for another term, and all of us who voted can finally and thankfully return to our slumber, content in the knowledge that once again democracy has worked its noble deed and the people have truly spoken. Yeah, right.

An Associated Press computer analysis has found that, of congressional candidates who entered the last two weeks of the race with the most financial resources–meaning money already spent and money still available, combined–96 percent won.

Ninety-six percent.

And it gets worse. In almost 60 percent of the House of Representative seats, winning candidates had a financial advantage of at least 10-1. No wonder pro wrestlers are getting into politics. It’s the only other major sport that’s so obviously fixed. Which isn’t to say there aren’t occasionally a few exceptions. This year’s voters rejected the highly partisan Sens. Lauch Faircloth and Al D’Amato, and the national Republican effort on behalf of House candidates, led by Newt Gingrich, now better known as the Kerry Collins of the GOP.

Lauch and Al both outspent their opponents and lost, and Newt frittered away a huge financial advantage on a spree of Monica Lewinsky ads. In the 30 races where the GOP bought airtime to show pictures of Monica, the Democrats won 18 seats.

So factionalism and Jenny McCarthyism are losing issues to a large chunk of the citizenry.

And Americans do tend to intuitively reject the Perots and Huffingtons who appear to be buying their way into office. The more the money comes from somebody else, the better we can maintain our illusions.

But it ought to tell us everything we need to know that the only significant victory by an independent, out of over 500 major political races nationwide, was by a professional wrestler. And if “The Body” can get elected, how long will it be before motocross, tractor pull, and drag-racing champions start jumping into public office?

Make no mistake–voting is the essence of democracy, absolutely indispensable and fundamental. But it means nothing without an informed and active electorate whose activities ensure a genuine choice at the ballot box. Real democracy doesn’t happen because we all vote for one guy over another. Real democracy is what we all do in the time between Novembers that gives trips to the voting booth their meaning.

Women didn’t get the vote in America because men changed the laws out of the goodness of their hearts. Women got the vote because they marched and protested and fought for the vote, literally for generations. Civil rights in the South didn’t happen because of a walk to a voting booth, but because of a March on Washington. And so on.

THE POLICY AUCTION we call the 2000 presidential election has already begun. It’ll take at least $20 million just to compete in the primaries. The only Democrat with access to those kind of dollars is Al Gore. End of story. The GOP won’t make the illegal fundraising allegations stick because both sides of the aisle have more dirty money than Papillon.

The rest of the mule team–Gephardt, Bradley, Kerrey, Kerry, Wellstone, etc.–have about as much chance at the nomination as Vinny Testaverde has at winning a Super Bowl. One of these five will probably be the VP.

I’m inclined to pick Bill Bradley, because he’s tall. Seriously. Tall candidates do really well in the TV era. Besides, he hasn’t done anything for the last few years, so he’s prepped for the job. But Bob Kerrey is raising a lot of cash on sheer early hustle, and platform shoes are back in style, so he looks like No. 2 for now.

No, I didn’t mean it that way.

MEANWHILE, the only GOP candidates with a financial prayer are Steve Forbes, George W. Bush, Lamar Alexander, and Newt Gingrich. Liddy Dole has an outside shot if she gloms the hubby’s Rolodex.

Quayle, Bauer, Ashcroft, Kasich, and a half-dozen GOP governors are just kidding themselves. Their poll numbers make the new $20 seem like a runaway hit. Cripes, if they’re gonna do something for vanity’s sake, they really ought to just mosey on down to GlamourShots and pose a few for the missus. Same impact on history, millions of dollars cheaper, and they throw in the frame for free. Bush fils is the current favorite, but his straw-poll performance will decline rapidly once he exists as more than a name outside of Texas. Besides, there’s a chance he won’t even run because of his reportedly, um, er, active, uh, personal life, which apparently only recently finally began to resemble that of a properly unsatisfied Republican.

Evidently Bushboy has more ass to cover than Dr. Laura.

NEWT GINGRICH can’t win, because he has a public approval rating only three points ahead of having a weasel running loose in your sinuses. Besides which, he owes Bob Dole bigtime for the tobacco-money rescue on last year’s ethics fine, which means if Liddy runs, Newt will probably have to support her campaign. Assuming he isn’t too busy feeding on carrion.

Lamar Alexander can’t win, because I sat behind him on a plane a while back and absolutely no one recognized him, even though we were flying into Tennessee, where he used to be the governor. The guy’s harder to remember than the last time “The Family Circus” was actually funny. Which leaves Steve Forbes.

And since most Republican partisans have no problem with paying retail for government office–the use of private wealth to attain public authority is seen as a First Amendment right–there’s no reason Steve Forbes can’t win the nomination, except for the fact that he strongly resembles one of the Budweiser lizards.

Forbes has unlimited wealth, a tax plan that appeals to the fiscal conservatives, and a newfound hard line on social issues that plays well with people who speak Tongues as a second language.

He’d be the perfect GOP candidate if his eyes weren’t on different sides of his head.

So …

The early guess for 2000 here is Gore/Kerrey defeating Forbes/Liddy Dole (or whomever) by a narrow margin, with Republican control of Congress expanding by five to 10 seats.

Not that any of this matters much, since the left and right in the American spectrum are defined merely as the extremes of acceptable dinner conversation among the moneyed class while waiting for Carlos to decant the Chianti.

Until you and I and the rest of the American public begin doing the real work of democracy, and take it on ourselves to force a change in the way campaigns are financed, the rest is largely a sideshow, a bait-and-switch carnival game creating the illusion of actual democracy while retaining little of its practical meaning.

Or at least 96 percent of it is.

From the November 19-24, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Ruhama Veltfort

Paradise Lost

Donna Sproull



‘The Promised Land’ lacks luster

By Patrick Sullivan

SINCE 1492 (at least) they’ve been wading ashore, drawn across vast oceans to the new world by all kinds of glittering attractions, real or imagined. Whether they came seeking fortune, fleeing famine, or just eager to set up shop where they could do the religious persecution for a change, immigrants to America have at least one thing in common: If they’d known how often we’d be telling their stories in the future, they would have staggered back in wide-eyed astonishment. “Dang!” they might have said. “Nobody cared this much in the old country.” Naturally, they’d be too full of old-world courtesy to voice their next thought: Don’t you people have anything else to write about?

But there’s no denying the appeal of tales of immigration to a nation full of readers descended from immigrants. In the back of our minds, most of us still harbor misty visions of Ellis Island and the Statue of Liberty, a fact that still influences our politics to this day: “Give us your huddled masses,” we tearfully urge the world, at least as long as they’re all Ph.D. computer programmers with a physical allergy to food stamps.

We’re even more charitable when it comes to books about the immigration experience. Still, we have our limits, and even the most forgiving readers may find they’ve hit rough seas when they sail into The Promised Land (Milk Weed Press; $23.95). This new offering from San Francisco author Ruhama Veltfort bears all the signs of a first novel: The author clearly has a wonderful tale to tell, but hasn’t quite got a handle on how to tell it.

First, the story. Veltfort has placed two fascinating characters at the center of her book, which begins in mid-19th-century Poland. Yitzhak is the charismatic, rebellious son of a rabbi who cannot live with his father’s strict orthodox beliefs. Chana is a deeply sensitive but half-wild peasant girl whose family has been torn apart by tragedy. Brought together by a series of mishaps and a minor miracle, the two are pushed into marriage by Chana’s adopted family before they know much about each other. Suspicion turns into affection, which blossoms into true love.

But Yitzhak, troubled by disturbing dreams, cannot rest. His uncanny healing powers and unorthodox ecstatic spiritual practices attract a small group of followers, and soon the little group finds itself on the road, moving first across Europe and then over the ocean in search of sanctuary and a potent something that Yitzhak can’t quite name.

Moved along by divine guidance and religious persecution, the Jewish settlers land in New Orleans, roll up the mighty Mississippi, and then head out west, braving close encounters with inscrutable Indians, fanatical Mormons, the Donnor party, and even San Francisco’s Emperor Norton.

It’s a great story, but the trick lies in the telling, and that’s where the author stumbles badly. Her descriptions are packed with clichés, her pacing is agonizingly slow until it’s much too fast, and her shifting narrative churns up the same ground repeatedly, often adding nothing to our understanding. Moreover, many of the minor characters–Jewish, Mormon, or Indian–are as flatly one-dimensional as a sheet of paper. Surely the worst examples are the black slaves who talk in bad Southern dialogue, eat watermelon, and pray for Moses to lead them over the River Jordan.

The novel saves most of its truly evocative descriptions for the characters’ ecstatic spiritual experiences. The author’s account of a crowded Jewish prayer circle is powerfully vivid: “Yitzhak closed his eyes, faint with odor and devotion. He felt the circle turn like a great wheel, whirling upward into space as though his feet no longer rested on the ground.”

Indeed, perhaps the novel’s biggest attraction is its intriguing exploration of Jewish religious beliefs, although the narrative is encumbered by a few too many unexplained Yiddish and Hebrew phrases.

The book picks up the pace in the second half and manages an unexpected ending. Still, the reader will be left with the hollow feeling that this story–put to paper so many times before–could have been told better. Maybe next time.

Ruhama Veltfort reads from The Promised Land Wednesday, Nov. 18, at 7:30 p.m. at Readers’ Books, 130 E. Napa St., Sonoma. 939-1779.

From the November 12-18, 1998 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

© Metro Publishing Inc.

Self-Publishing

Fine Print Bootstrap books: Sebsastopol writer and self-publisher Barbara Baer has enjoyed success with Saltwater, Sweetwater, an anthology of local female writers. Writers do it for themselves in the world of self-publishing By Marina Wolf THERE'S A CERTAIN stigma attached to the self-published book in the minds of the masses. "Poor sap," a...

The Scoop

Who Shot JFK? By Bob Harris I had no idea what to write this week. Then tonight I'm onstage for two hours doing my odd little comedy/research JFK assassination piece for about 300 people in Indiana, ranting and joking about the CIA the whole time, when this weird old guy in a turquoise bolo tie and false...

Windsor INS Raids

Coyotes & Campesinos United they stand: Kim Caldeway and Alicia Sanchez of Pueblos Unidos object to Windsor police involvement in raids. Immigrants protest Windsor INS raids By Dylan Bennett ON THE HUNT for coyotes, a team of federal agents from the Immigration and Naturalization Service, accompanied by Windsor police, entered three Windsor residences, pistols...

The Inn of the Beginning

The Inn Crowd Inn of the Beginning turns 30 By Charles McDermid IN THE BEGINNING, Greg Cochrane simply needed some rest. It was 1968 and Cochrane was holding what his close friend and fellow Sonoma State University student David McNair recalls as "a permanent party going on all summer. He said that if he was...

Talking Pictures

Bombing Out Get me out of here: Is that Denzel Washington fleeing the set of The Siege? Two action novelists take on 'The Siege' By David Templeton David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This time around, he journeys to Sacramento--the hometown of authors...

Spins

Rare Air Past life: The four-CD John Lennon Anthology cuts close to the bone. New CDs focus on rarities from Lennon, Springsteen, Stereolab and the John Coltrane Quartet John Lennon Anthology Capitol/EMI DURING a decade-long solo career, John Lennon distanced himself from his Beatles past and left behind an intimate recorded legacy that...

Medea, the Musical

Greek Grins Triple threat: Coco Boylan, Sheila Groves, and Argo Thompson star in Medea. Campy 'Medea' makes merry By Daedalus Howell BRAVISSIMO! The Actors' Theatre production of Medea, the Musical gets in everything but the, er, kitsch-en sink. This Technicolor cabaret extravaganza, skillfully sutured from a talented sexy cast and playwright-director John Fisher's hilariously...

Thanksgiving Table Wines

Feast of Flavors Michael Amsler The search for that perfect Thanksgiving table wine By Bob Johnson IF THE ANNUAL Thanksgiving Day feast is a "formal" occasion around your house, heaven help you when the time comes to select the accompanying wines. I've been trying for years to uncover the "ultimate" Turkey Day vino ......

The Scoop

Death Race 2000 By Bob Harris SO ON NOV. 3 we good citizens all traipsed down to the ballot box and exercised our democratic muscles by voting for the millionaire of our choice. Yippee. News coverage across the land exalted the holy ritual, airing man-on-the-street interviews with exiting voters who decried their non-voting fellow citizens as...

Ruhama Veltfort

Paradise Lost Donna Sproull 'The Promised Land' lacks luster By Patrick Sullivan SINCE 1492 (at least) they've been wading ashore, drawn across vast oceans to the new world by all kinds of glittering attractions, real or imagined. Whether they came seeking fortune, fleeing famine, or just eager to set up shop where they...
11,084FansLike
4,606FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow