.Generation Debt

Young workers and the Employee Free Choice Act

07.22.09

Once again, a generation gap is evident in American politics and culture. Young voters supported President Obama by a huge 2–1 margin over Sen. John McCain in the national election last fall. A recent Pew Research Center poll reveals that differences between the young and old about social issues and values is greater than any time since the turbulent Vietnam and Civil Rights era of the 1960s.

Behind this widening generation gap are the declining economic prospects for young workers; not surprisingly, jobs and the economy are the top issues for young voters. Congress is currently considering the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) that would restore the right to organize a union. President Obama supports the legislation, and approval by Congress is critical for the upward mobility of young workers and to rebuild the middle class.

In 1935, Congress passed the National Labor Relations Act to guarantee the rights of workers to organize a union and to bargain collectively for better pay, benefits and working conditions. However, today those rights exist only on paper, according to Human Rights Watch. During organizing campaigns, workers are forced to attend anti-union meetings with their supervisors; are routinely subjected to threats that a company will close if a union organizing drive is successful; and some 10,000 workers are illegally fired each year for exercising their right to organize a union.

Our current system is broken and must be overhauled. The EFCA will protect the right to organize by strengthening penalties for illegal violation of workers’ rights during an organizing campaign, and by providing an option for majority sign-up, which would require employers to recognize a union when a majority of workers have signed union authorization cards.

Young workers are now experiencing the most extended period of downward mobility since the Great Depression. According to a 2008 report, “The Economic State of Young America,” published by Demos, a nonprofit research organization:

• The median annual earnings for young men (25–34) with a high school education declined by 29 percent between 1975 and 2005, and decreased by 10 percent for young women who are high school graduates. The drop of earnings was even steeper for young African-American and Latino workers with only a high school education.

• The median earnings for young men with a bachelor’s degree decreased 2 percent between 1975 and 2005, while the earnings for college-educated women increased slightly by 10 percent.

• One in three young workers between the ages of 18 and 34 does not have healthcare insurance, the highest rate by far for all age groups.

Moreover, economic mobility for young workers is constrained by the rising costs of higher education. Tuition at public universities has doubled since 1980 after adjusting for inflation. In 2006, more than half of all graduates from four-year institutions left with student loan debt averaging nearly $20,000.

The stagnation of wages and diminishing benefits for young workers over the last three decades is due to erosion of the inflation-adjusted minimum wage; globalization and the export of good manufacturing jobs abroad; the dotcom tech bust of the late 1990s and the proliferation of low-wage service sector jobs; the increase of part-time and contingent employment; and, most importantly, the decline of union membership.

In 1955, 37 percent of private sector workers were union members, but in 2007 only 12 percent of all workers belonged to a union. Less than 5 percent of young workers are union members today.

Polling data suggests that young workers strongly support unions. Young workers are disproportionately clustered in nonunion, low-wage, service-sector industries such as hotels, restaurants, retail and security services. Implementation of the EFCA will likely lead to a major upsurge of unionization in these industries.

The benefits of union membership for young workers are substantial. A Center for Economic and Policy Research report indicates that young workers between 18 and 29 who are union members earn 12.4 percent more—or about $1.75 per hour—compared to nonunion, and that 68 percent of young union workers receive health benefits compared to 38 percent for nonunion workers.

Congress must act now to comprehensively address the deteriorating economic conditions of young workers. Healthcare reform and a public option for the uninsured; increased support for higher education, such as need-based federal Pell grants for college tuition; paid family leave; and tax credits for first-time home buyers will all benefit young workers. Most importantly, Congress should implement the EFCA to ensure a prosperous future for the next generation.

Martin J. Bennett teaches American history at Santa Rosa Junior College, serves on the Executive Board of the North Bay Labor Council, and is co-chair of the Living Wage Coalition of Sonoma County.

Open Mic is a weekly feature in the Bohemian. We welcome your contribution. To have your topical essay of 700 words considered for publication, write [email protected].

 


Martin J. Bennett
Martin J. Bennett is instructor emeritus of history at Santa Rosa Junior College and a research and policy analyst for UNITE HERE 2850.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_img
North Bay Bohemian E-edition North Bay Bohemian E-edition