Patz & Hall

0

There’s nothing in particular about this postcard that tells you it’s an artifact from the 1980s. Printed to commemorate the winery’s 25th anniversary, it pictures founders James Hall, Anne Moses, Heather Patz and Donald Patz. You might still find a mustached winemaker, just like James Hall, today, and as for Heather Patz, well, bangs are in again, are they not?

But there’s just something about the whole picture that stamps its era. The four friends were Napa Valley newbies, confident and hopeful, when they founded Patz & Hall—provisionally named Project X—in 1988. And with good reason. They’ve since built a prestigious, 27,000-case operation, which keeps sales director Donald Patz on the horn with distributors nationwide.

In their Napa Valley tasting salon, opened in 2007, Heather Patz would like to draw your attention to a different set of photographs. “Being in a corporate park, it’s hard to point to the soil,” Patz says. “But we can point to the growers.” Patz & Hall buys all its fruit from growers. Some of the relationships date to way back when they all used to pile in the car to visit them. Photos of Lee Hudson, Larry Hyde, the Martinelli, Dutton and Pisoni families and others are spot-lit in the salon. “They do respect what we’re trying to do,” says Patz. Of course, she adds, “We have to pay them well.”

The salon, all glass partitions inside a Napa Valley business park, required little modification to suit their purposes. Guests are welcomed with a flute of 2010 Brut Sparkling ($38). Drop-ins are accommodated at the bar; sit-downs are presented in the conference room, five wines, five stems.

The 2010 Hyde Vineyard Chardonnay’s ($58) oak has a spicy, herbal quality, and after a whiff of toasted almond, the wine leaves reluctantly, luxuriating in a sweet texture that exhibits the best of barrel-fermented Chardonnay, viz., not buttery; creamy. I am smelling popcorn in the 2010 Zio Tony Ranch Chardonnay ($60), but it’s something like that “hippie popcorn,” doused with yeast and herbs, finishing with crisp, limey acidity.

The 2010 Chenoweth Ranch Pinot Noir ($58) is rich with brooding fruit, Christmas spice and potpourri; the 2010 Burnside Vineyard Pinot Noir ($70), savory with olive and smoked meat, lush with dry, blueberry fruit; and the 2010 Pisoni Vineyard Pinot Noir ($85), drier and bigger with the blueberries yet.

There’s nothing in particular that tells you that the price points of these wines range up to the mid $80s. They’re subtle, deep and integrated. Indeed, it’s the whole picture.

Patz & Hall Salon, 851 Napa Valley Corporate Way, Suite A, Napa. Wednesday–Sunday, 10am–4pm. Seated tastings 10:30am, 1pm and 3pm. Tasting fee, $20–$40. 707.265.7700.

Still Too Big

0

Headline! Wall Street Gets Mind-Altering Substance into New York Times Water Cooler! What else can we think when we see the normally level-headed New York Times serving up bankster sympathy and false choices?

Take a peek at the Feb. 18 article on possible prosecution of the biggest banks. It seems positively drunk with disinformation. Up front they are selling us a false dilemma supposedly facing the Department of Justice, i.e., either the DOJ responds to bank malfeasance with the usual reprimands and fines which—gosh darn it—never seem to affect bank behavior, or they muster up the courage to prosecute bankers, perhaps getting actual indictments and convictions, loss of operating licenses, maybe a bank failure. Yikes, it could take down the whole economy!

So what is the article trying to say? First, that accepted wisdom is true: these banks really are too big to fail or jail. We are in fact so desperate to keep them on an even keel that we will always accept their corrupt, fraudulent behavior, even if our dentists scold us for grinding our teeth at night.

Secondly, the Times is offering us a juicy false choice. Either we go after the banks head-on and risk a market cataclysm featuring all of us selling pencils on street corners, or we belt up and let Jamie Dimon have his way with us.

No one wants to talk about reinstating the Glass-Steagall Act, of course. This would separate commercial and investment banking, so we might be able to jail an investment banker without taking down the entire economy.

The banks’ response to this is predictable: eeeeek! Glass-Steagall means U.S. banks at a disadvantage in the global economy! Stifling market activity! Markets go into a tailspin!

The Simple Answer Dept. handles that one. First, all large banks are international in character now, and they pledge allegiance only to themselves. “U.S. banks” has almost no meaning. And second, all global banks are currently in such terrible straits that the G-20 should, for the banks’ own good, decide that all of them should separate commercial and investment banking. A novel idea—restoring stability to the world economy.

Paul Moser is a former winemaker living in Napa County.Open Mic is a weekly op/ed feature in the Bohemian. We welcome your contribution. To have your topical essay of 350 words considered for publication, write op*****@******an.com.

Sashimi Dreams

0

Does Shige dream of sushi the same way Jiro dreams of sushi? Shigekazu Mori, former sushi chef at Hiro—the best restaurant in Rohnert Park and one of the top sushi bars in the North Bay—has opened his own joint in downtown Cotati. In the old Nagomi spot, Shige Sushi replaces Nagomi as Cotati’s raw, pesca-vegetarian dining option.

Inside, it’s visually an improvement over its predecessor. Gone are the flat-screen televisions with a looped DVD of an odd Japanese tourism video. New are the menu additions of tuna poke and matcha (concentrated, powdered green tea) mousse. Also new are the prices, which are slightly higher than locals might be used to.

But the quality justifies the price. Not only is the décor of the small space (22 seats, including the bar) more appealing, the fish seems, well, just generally better. Not a knock on Nagomi, which had the best sushi lunch special around, but its main draw was the low price. It wasn’t the type of place that would lure curious diners off the freeway and through downtown Cotati. Shige, with its selection of traditional and Americanized (read: mayo-topped) rolls and expertly prepared nigiri, might be just that.

Shige Sushi, 8235 Old Redwood Hwy., Cotati. Lunch, Tuesday–Friday; dinner, Tuesday–Sunday. 707.795.9753.

Letters to the Editor: March5, 2013

Express Mail

I am a letter carrier and NALC shop steward in Sonoma. I just wanted to contact you about your article this week, because there are so many people getting it wrong (“A First-Class Institution,” Feb. 20). It is refreshing to see that someone gets it and, indeed, reported it correctly. Thank you so much for this article. I am reposting it everywhere! If I wasn’t an avid reader before, you guys got me hooked now.

Thanks again for fighting the fight for the little guys. It means so much.

Sonoma

To Hell with the NRA

Having had a few years membership in the NRA, I finally decided to just say no to the BS and quit them (“American Psychos,” Dec. 26). All they want is more money. I asked them why didn’t they ask Bush and Cheney for a few million after they walked out with over $11 billion in war profits from their watch.

I do own a collection of semiautomatic rifles and WWII combat rifles that are not for hunting. I like to go out and burn off a few clips, and I do keep the weapons for self-protection. I hunted a lot as a boy until a tour in Vietnam, which caused me to swear to never take another life, be it animal or human, unless it was to save a life—mine or another’s.

I served as a federal law enforcement officer for some years and never fired my arms once while on duty. I was with a fellow officer who shot an unarmed man carrying a surveyors stake he was carving on to make a play sword for his little boy. Officially, on record, the guy charged the trigger-happy officer with a sword. The shooter was exonerated from any charges as it was a clean shooting, even though the victim was not wanted on any warrant.

I’ll wager money most hunters aren’t members of the NRA. We all cannot be John Wayne or Rambo. But some of us did serve our country, and experienced what a firearm can do to another human being. I still have nightmares about it. To blame Obama for all the firearms sold to Mexico is a joke. It is a no-brainer that firearms dealers on the borders of Texas and Arizona are the real blame. But, hey, don’t go there—it’s all about American free enterprise, right?

Covelo

Something Rotten

Regarding the redwood trees along Highway 101 cut down and sold by Ghilotti Construction for a profit (“Deadwood Hwy.,” Jan. 30), just because something is legal doesn’t make it right. Legality is a cop-out for when something smells bad and feels wrong. If it looks bad and smells bad, then there is something in there that’s rotten. Trust your nose.

Those trees belonged to the public, period. What their value is relative to the size of the project does not diminish their importance, nor does it diminish the stench, public or private.

Via online

Duhhh!

Re: Daniel Garcia’s reply to my recent letter (“Cool Down, Man,” Feb. 13), those who try to argue against truth always resort to cheap tactics. They make up “facts” and they hurl personal insults. Thus does Mr. Garcia, in emulation of the moronic name calling that Limbaugh, Hannity, et al., like to spew at Obama.

Of course I voted for Obama over Romney—duhhh!—but that doesn’t mean I’ll give him or any other big-time decider a pass for persisting in a covetous, murderous, ruinous agenda that benefits only the profiteers of the war machine.

Too bad the last, most important sentence of my letter was chopped for space: “As long as we pursue client ways elsewhere, we can count on incurring more of the same on home soil.” Via retaliation or karma. It’s inevitable. World History 101 says it all.

Mr. Garcia might do well to read “The Force,” in the Jan. 28 New Yorker. Or he might gain some perspective the way I did, by serving four years in the U.S. Marine Corps. Nothing beats a scarlet and gold hanky for wiping the Gerber off one’s face.

Sebastopol

Write to us at le*****@******an.com.

When Trees Get Saved

0

Preservation Ranch will officially be preserved. As announced last week, a conservation group will purchase the 20,000-acre plot of forest in northwestern Sonoma County, effectively derailing a much-contested plan to clear-cut the land for vineyard development.

The total purchase price for the property is reportedly $24.5 million, $4 million less than the $28.5 million purchase price in 2004.

Leading the purchase is Virginia-based charity the Conservation Fund, which contributed $6 million to the sale. (The California Coastal Conservancy put in up to $10 million and Sonoma County’s Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District ponied up as much as $4 million in addition to the Sonoma Land Trust’s portion.)

For the past eight years, the $253 billion state employees’ pension fund CalPERS controlled the land and backed a proposal to cut down over 1,700 acres of forest for vineyards, set aside 15,000 acres to sell as lumber and use 2,700 acres as a wildlife preserve. As recently as February of last year, officials said the plan to develop the land had not changed.

The purchase not only helps birds, squirrels, raccoons and would-be competing wineries, but it clears a looming political cloud from Sonoma County supervisor Efren Carrillo’s future career. A possible vote on the plan by the Board of Supervisors would have put him in a tough spot, having to choose between his environmental-leaning constituency and helping political mentors and campaign fundraisers with direct ties to the project. He had not taken a stance on the issue—and now, surely much to his relief, he’s off the hot seat.

Rock ‘n’ Shock

2

“Now, if you’ll step over here,” offers writer-director Daniel Sullivan, matter-of-factly, “I’d like to show you our guillotine. We’d be fools not to have one.”

At the edge of this spooky-gothic living room set, near a gleaming EZ-Jib camera crane that stands at the center of the room, the guillotine looms with whimsically creepy menace. No self-respecting house of horrors would be worth its weight in rattling chains without its own head-detaching device, and the fact that this one is actually a nonlethal prop doesn’t really matter. It’s a guillotine.

As Sullivan continues his tour through the elaborate set of the Santa Rosa–based television series House on the Hill, it’s clear that whoever erected this sprawling haunted mansion was thoroughly steeped in the classics: The Addams Family, The Munsters, The Ghost and Mr. Chicken.

“We’ve worked hard to include every Halloween-style element we can think of,” says Sullivan, who co-writes and directs the show, created and financed by local software impresario Jeff Bodean.

Few would suspect that inside this unassuming office building near the Santa Rosa Airport, a 6,000-square-foot movie set has been built, crammed with gloriously gloomy bric-a-brac that looks like it was imported from Edgar Allan Poe’s dreams. Glassy-eyed animal heads stare out from the walls. Slightly distorted portraits of oddly shaped relatives, festooned with faux cobwebs, hang beside an imposing pipe organ. Every clock is stopped at 10:31, a cheeky reference to All Hallows’ Eve.

Even the dust-covered furniture looks like it was imported from Transylvania. The interior design, all Victorian wallpaper and soaring wooden columns, is tastefully augmented with armless statues of weeping angels and vase after vase of dead flowers.

“Our props and furniture,” says Sullivan, “are a perfect blend of rare antiques, stuff purchased from Halloween stores and Ross Dress for Less and various things from Jeff’s personal collection of Halloween decorations.

“Sometimes,” he adds, “people send us things they don’t want anymore. ‘You have a severed head you don’t need? Send it over!’ We’ve become the epicenter of post-Halloween-prop disposal.”

That said, this is one haunted house that is not open to trick-or-treaters. House on the Hill is very much a working television show, even if Sullivan and Bodean have only produced two episodes in the last two years, with a third getting ready to shoot.

Starring Bodean as burned-out rock star Vincent Van Dahl, the sitcom is a fish-out-of-water story, following Vincent as he retires from the world of rock and roll, moves in with his valet Livingston and a trio of fun-seeking groupies to a secluded house in the country, and soon realizes that the house is every bit as haunted as it looks. The show’s tagline? “Paparazzi are annoying. Poltergeists are worse.”

Bodean, who hired Sullivan three years ago to help bring his TV project to life, is the founder and CEO of Micromat, a Santa Rosa–based company that designs diagnostic software and other products for users of Macintosh computers. But locals know him best from his appearances in various public arenas—be it club-hopping in downtown Santa Rosa on weekends, commenting frequently on Press Democrat articles online, or, most famously, appearing on the Bravo reality show Millionaire Matchmaker.

It was while on an episode of Millionaire Matchmaker that Bodean realized people who produce television are often making it up as they go along. Bringing his well-honed DIY mindset to the project, Bodean assembled a team, wrote a script, built a set and started making his own show.

So far, House on the Hill has been televised only on Bay Area stations (with episode two running last weekend on KTVU), but the show has established a fan base on YouTube, with over 50,000 views. The project is an example of how rapidly evolving technologies are placing the tools of creativity into the hands of a wider pool of people than was the case just 10 or 15 years ago.

“It’s definitely the most fun I’ve ever had,” says Bodean, described by Bravo as a cross between Liberace and Mindfreak illusionist Cris Angel. Bodean agrees that his experience as a “tech geek,” combined with his childhood knack for creating realistic science-fiction props out of household materials, gives him a perfect skill set for making a TV show.

“Last week, I wasn’t completely happy with parts of the new episode,” he admits. “So I called Dan, wrote some new lines, went to the studio, set it up and shot the new stuff. If this were Hollywood, that would have taken weeks. Hollywood is awesome, but it’s a very slow-moving animal, whereas we can be much more nimble.”

He’s certainly eager to learn from his mistakes. House on the Hill‘s first episode is conspicuously, um, amateurish.

“Well, we didn’t really know what we were doing.” he laughs. “So we took what we learned from that first episode, and the second one is miles better than the first.”

Bodean’s inner child, one suspects, is thrilled at how far his adult self has come in terms of making props and special effects. When he and the crew first started, the FX were done old-school, with fishing wire and guys hiding behind the set wiggling suits of armor.

“By the second episode,” Bodean says, “we were incorporating all kinds of CGI and green-screen effects here and there. You know that huge staircase in the background? That staircase is actually in the Ukraine, in some museum. But with the magic of special effects, it’s now in our haunted mansion.”

Anticipating the random snide remark people might make about a rich guy blowing his money on what might seem to be a vanity project, Bodean says he’s having too much fun to worry what other people think.

“In terms of the cost, it really doesn’t take that much,” he says. “The set is awesome, yes, but we’ve cut a lot of corners and have managed to do this for almost nothing.

“As far as my personal investment in House on the Hill goes,” he continues, “you just have to decide what matters and then do what you have to do. I was living the high life there for a while. I had a big house in Fountaingrove. I was driving a Bentley. And I got rid of all that so I could do this show. Now I live in a tiny little house, probably the smallest house I’ve ever lived in my life, but I love it, because now I can do what I love.”

Bodean hopes that the show will eventually begin to pay for itself, through revenue streams he has yet to develop. But no matter what lies ahead for Bodean and House on the Hill, one thing’s for sure: he’s keeping the guillotine.

Find more at www.houseonthehill.tv.

Short and Sweet

0

“If you’ve ever been in the theater,” says Paul Draper, acting department director at Sonoma State University, “and halfway through you thought, ‘I don’t really like this play’ . . . well, in the One-Page Play Extravaganza, if you don’t like a play, just wait three minutes and you’ll see a different play.”

Last year, Draper invited students and faculty of SSU to contemplate the concept of “water” and to submit plays on that theme. Water, one way or another, is the subject of SSU’s performing arts productions this year, all offered under the title “Water Works.” With these new submissions, however, the trick was that they could be no longer than a single page. Out of all the scripts submitted, 12 have been chosen for a special one-night-only event on March 13. Free to the public, the evening will showcase the selected works in staged readings acted out by students of the SSU acting department.

“I did one-page-play festivals for three years running in San Francisco several years ago,” says Draper. “It’s a fun evening for an audience because it’s a little different, a fast turnover kind of thing. It works really well in the age of Twitter.”

The plays examine the subject of water from different perspectives, exploring H2O from the views of scientists, poets, sociologists and other thirsty people.

“The strict requirement of just having one page forces a certain kind of artistic economy. It’s a fun challenge, and I think some very interesting things have come from it.”

Those dozen new plays are not the only original works being given the water treatment this year. Though students have always been encouraged to write for their senior projects and other student-driven, on-campus projects, this season marks the first time a new student-authored play has been included in the theater department’s official lineup of shows. Dylan Waite’s The Séance, directed by Jon Robin (also a student), takes place in Fresno during a drought, and examines the way a young woman deals with all manner of dry spells, literal, emotional and spiritual.

“When Dylan presented this play, we liked that it dealt with the absence of water in some very clever ways,” says Draper of Waite, who also submitted a pair of plays for the one-page festival. “Clearly, having grown up in Fresno, he knows what he’s writing about.”

Scientology Slam

Remember mp3.com? In the pre-YouTube, early Napster world of the internet, it was how the masses legally downloaded songs and videos. And in the year 2000, before Google was a verb, a video was uploaded to mp3.com of a young red-haired kid named Jamie DeWolf performing a slam poem about his great-grandfather, Church of Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard, in front of about 50 people.

Within a week, Scientologists had seen the video and were tracking DeWolf in his hometown.

“They were literally running me down,” says DeWolf. “I had private investigators following me, they showed up at my house. They had this whole cover story that they were promoters putting on a show with me.”

DeWolf’s mother, who had seen Scientology consume and destroy her father and grandfather, eventually clued him in to the intent of these mysterious people. “She recognized them immediately just by their general demeanor and how they were asking questions about me, and tried to identify who they were. She ended up kicking them off the porch.”

SHEEPSKIN SUIT

Everyone’s got their own take on religion, but for DeWolf, the subject is particularly vexing. “It’s really, really difficult growing up as a Christian when your great-grandfather was a cult leader who basically made himself a god, sort of, in our lifetime, for me to do anything without just a complete view of skepticism,” he says on the phone from his home in Oakland.

DeWolf’s conflicted upbringing fuels his writing and performance, which has made the 35-year-old a buzzed-about name in the East Bay hotbed of slam poetry. DeWolf is the featured poet at the monthly North Bay Poetry Slam (NBPS) at Sebastopol’s Hopmonk Tavern on March 10, where fellow Oakland slammer Joyce Lee was featured last month. NBPS host and creator Brianna Sage calls DeWolf “the most well-known performer” the NBPS has hosted, and “possibly the person I look up to the most as a performer.”

DeWolf grew up as a Baptist Christian, and his youthful belief was so fervent that he passed out pamphlets on the impending apocalypse. But now he checks “athiesm” on survey boxes. “I refuse to waste another day speculating on somebody else’s theology that they’re going to pre-package and hand to me,” he says.

As the creator and host of the slam poetry vaudeville show Tourettes Without Regrets, which attracts over 400 attendees each month at the Oakland Metro Operahouse, DeWolf has plenty to keep himself occupied. But lately he’s been taking on even more projects, like the full-length film Smoked, about a botched cannabis-club robbery, which he starred in, wrote, produced and directed. He’s also made several short films based on his poems, and teaches creative writing classes.

Slam poetry isn’t for everyone, but it can be a perfect creative outlet for those seeking release. “A poetry slam is a place for people to share their voices, the things they thought nobody would ever want to hear,” says Sage. Part written word, part performance art, slam poetry is controversial, emotional and often angry. Poems are more in the style of Chuck D than T. S. Eliot. This fits DeWolf like a tailored sheepskin suit, allowing him to walk around unnoticed in everyday life until he reveals his sharp teeth onstage with violent tirades, brutal honesty, intense vulnerability and Ginsu-like sarcasm.

But no matter how much everyday invisibility may be an asset to DeWolf, the giant eye of Scientology is always keeping watch.

[page]

CULT .45

Since being hounded for the mp3.com video—and, that same year, speaking at the first anti-Scientology gathering in the cult’s mecca of Clearwater, Fla.—DeWolf’s been more reactive than proactive in his defiance. “I met a guy who spent millions of dollars battling the church in every court. They fought him with every atom of their being and kind of eventually destroyed this guy,” says DeWolf. “I just saw the sheer totality of how many lives had been utterly wrecked by this insane, tentacled creature that my great-grandfather created, and I realized, ‘Man, there’s a lot more that I want to do with my life right now.'”

Even so, in 2011 he was named the one of the Village Voice‘s “top 25 people crippling Scientology,” and he gave a performance last year on NPR’s Snap Judgment about his family history. (DeWolf changed his last name from Kennedy to his mother’s maiden name after the comedian of the same name started getting popular.)

Such public notice makes his relatives worried. “My family’s always been incredibly leery of anything I’ve said against the cult,” he says, “because they’ve been trying to escape this cult for their entire life.”

But is he worried for himself, too? “Uh, yeah,” he laughs, nervously. “Their legacy of how they have dealt with their opposition is absolutely, staggeringly disgusting.” Bomb threats, phone taps, frame-ups and reputation destruction are just some of the less violent tools the cult has been alleged to have used. “The day that Snap Judgment video came out, I said, ‘You’ve got to let me know when this thing goes public,’ because from that point on I was literally watching for suspicious cars, I was making sure that I was always with someone when I was around, I check my damn brakes when I start my car, stuff like that.”

Amid this, DeWolf has perfected his craft, racking up awards from the National Poetry Slam and Oakland and Berkeley Grand Slam championships. He was a featured performer on HBO’s Def Poetry Jam and, in the middle of touring the world with the poetry trio Suicide Kings, made a stop long ago at Sonoma State University.

DIFFERENT KIND OF SLAM

Briana Sage’s North Bay Poetry Slam in Sebastopol sees anywhere from 60 to 150 people for the open mic, featured performer and slam competition format—and the word is spreading. “It’s been growing,” says Sage. “People have just been coming up to me and asking, ‘How can I make this happen?'”

In fact, two monthly slams have started as a result of the NPBS, one at Santa Rosa’s Arlene Francis Center (International House of Poetry, hosting its next slam March 15) and one at Cotati’s Redwood Cafe (the Barnburner Slam, hosting its next slam March 12). Rather than viewing it as competition, Sage, wise beyond her 19 years, embraces the community vibe. “It’s awesome that there are more slams starting around here,” she says. “It’s just about everybody that wants to come share something, and giving them a place to share.”

The Santa Rosa Junior College student started the NBPS in 2010, when she was just 16, after winning the Sonoma County Library Slam in her first public performance. “I started writing when I was seven years old, and from seven to 15 I just performed in front of a mirror and had no idea people ever did these things in front of an audience,” says Sage. “I was so shy. I had bad stage fright—like, ridiculously bad.”

Watching Sage perform and host, one wouldn’t know she even knew the definition of fear.

As a woman, Sage is a minority in the slam poetry world. “It’s a sausage-fest,” explains Joyce Lee, the only woman to earn the title of Oakland’s Grand Slam Champion in the competition’s 15 years. She earned a rousing ovation from the crowd of about 80 at Hopmonk last month with topics ranging from her grandfather’s toughness to her mediocre vagina.

[page]

Though slam poetry may be on an upswing here in the States, it’s still far more popular in Europe. “If you go to Germany and you have an audience of 200 people, that’s a small audience,” says Lee. She’s toured Europe (and has been on NPR’s Snap Judgment five times, making her the program’s most-featured female poet), and says slam poetry in the United States lacks in terms of substance. “Most of the poetry is about nothing, because people fear judgment,” she says. “They fear accountability of changing thought.”

Lee, who has been writing since age eight, has only been slamming for the past six years. “To a lot of people, that’s not a long time,” she says. “A lot of people tell me, ‘You’re still a baby until you’ve been doing it for 10-plus years.'”

If that’s the case, then most of competitors at the North Bay Poetry Slam are still in the womb.

BABIES BOOMING

Unlike Tourettes Without Regrets, which is so popular that it’s forced to pick competitors through random lottery, just about everyone who signs up can get a spot in Sebastopol. The open mic preceding the slam is a good place for first-timers to cut their teeth. “To get on a stage for the first time, to share something as delicate as your heartfelt emotions written into a poem—that’s a lot for someone to be comfortable with,” says Sage. “It doesn’t matter if you forget your words, if you have to read it, if you’re not super-confident about it, the audience will support you. And that’s why I love our show.”

That’s not always the case with slam shows, she adds. Audiences at the weekly Berkeley slam can rip apart a poet who’s unprepared or just doesn’t have the lyrical chops needed to keep it interesting. Lee started working the door at the slam before trying it out herself, and pulls no punches. “When people are up there talking about nothing or saying that we’re all nothing, it’s hard for me to listen to,” she says. “I’m not saying that I get mad, but I truly get bored.” She keeps a book in her purse, she says, and she knows how to use it.

DeWolf understands what it’s like to start small and knows that it doesn’t mean things will stay that way. “It all kind of started in my little small town when I started getting kicked out of my own open mics. Slams are the only show that would not kick me out,” he says.

“I have a lot of love for people who just completely are defiant in the space of small towns and create a space for people to speak and to create an open forum. It’s like flamethrowers for moths. There’s a lot of magic that can happen with that,” says DeWolf. “It certainly changed my life.”

Miller Time

As noted by her husband recently on national TV, Rebecca Miller has lived with many extreme men—a boxer, a deranged butcher, an obsessed oil prospector and, most recently, a U.S. president.

That’s because Miller is married to über-method actor Daniel Day-Lewis, who famously stays in character on and off set throughout the entire length of filming. What kind of woman could endure such eccentricity? One who’s spent her life in the company of unusual, brilliant men—she’s also the daughter of playwright Arthur Miller.

Despite living in enormous shadows, Miller has become an accomplished writer and filmmaker in her own right. She even cast her husband in the starring role of her 2004 film that she wrote and directed, The Ballad of Jack and Rose—which, so great was the talent involved, put the world at great risk of a rift in the space-time continuum.

Averting disaster, Miller wrote the Kafkaesque novel Jacob’s Folly, due out this week, about an 18th-century Jewish peddler reincarnated as a fly in present-day Long Island. She appears on Wednesday, March 13, at Copperfield’s Books. 140 Kentucky St., Petaluma. 6pm. Free. 707.762.0563.

Who’s Responsible?

0

In a lawsuit that could shake up the homecare industry statewide, a Sonoma County caregiver is claiming that she worked seven days a week for three months without ever being paid. While a local judge dismissed the case in 2011, an appellate court’s recent opinion may give it new life, revealing the confusing and sometimes contradictory language of in-home-care laws.

According to court testimony, Santa Rosa caregiver Adelina Guerrero worked as an in-home services provider for Alejandra Buenrostro from November 2008 to January 2009.

Confusion about the manner in which she would be receiving wages left her empty-handed until she went to the county’s In Home Supportive Services (IHSS) department, which pays $11.50 an hour to the caregivers of low-income disabled clients.

“She registered and signed up and attempted to submit [her hours] through the county, and at that point, she found out that the county had already paid for the work,” says Guerrero’s lawyer, Jeff Hoffman of California Rural Legal Assistance.

So where did that money go? Buenrostro’s grandmother and legal representative Sherry Amezcua was registered through IHSS as her care worker, according to Diane Kalijan of Aging and Adult Services. During the time Guerero claims she was working, Amezcua was submitting timesheets and receiving the payment her caregiver is allegedly owed.

Guerrero was never paid, and Buenrostro and her grandmother disappeared, according to Hoffman. The question raised in court is whether these unpaid wages are the responsibility of the county’s IHSS.

County agencies say they aren’t. Although an IHSS social worker vets potential clients and then the public agency foots their caregiving bill, those clients are responsible for hiring, firing and supervising their own caregivers. “The client is considered the employer for their caregiver,” the IHSS website states.

A document from the original legal scuffle, dated May 2011, argues that because the county agency cannot supervise or hire workers, it shouldn’t be considered an employer in this instance either. “A holding that the County or the IHSS-PA is an employer for wage and hour purposes would lead to the absurd result of imposing liability on the County Defendants when they are statutorily prohibited from controlling the employment relationship between the IHSS recipient and the provider,” it reads.

Thus, in the county’s estimation, no foul play on its end occurred. In 2011, the court agreed, and the county’s demurrer was sustained. “We followed the regulations as written and paid the provider of record,” Kalijan says.

But according to Guerrero’s testimony, the county paid the wrong provider—an oversight that, if the caregiver’s story is true, allowed an exchange of public money that looks an awful lot like theft.

“It’s our contention that the county has a duty to investigate this kind of thing,” Hoffman says. Guerrero’s argument juxtaposes these supposedly misdirected payments with federal and state labor laws, claiming that the county was, in fact, her employer.

Her statement isn’t unfounded, according to the court of appeals. In a document called an appellate opinion, published in February, it claims that the county’s role is opaque at best, drawing on past cases and reasoning: “The IHSS statutes treat providers as employees for some purposes, but not for all.”

[page]

When an IHSS worker receives direct payment from a county, for example, their check is coming from the state, which acts as an employer by providing disability benefits, workers’ compensation, federal and state income tax and insurance benefits.

The document cites a 1983 case arguing that IHSS “had complete economic control over the relationship. The ‘economic reality’ was that the [agencies] employed the chore workers to perform social services for the benefit of the recipients. The fact that the [agencies] delegated to the recipients various responsibilities does not alter this, it merely makes them joint employers [with the recipients].”

The Court of Appeals released its statement in February, and further action is pending.

Since Amezcua began collecting wages in 2008, the county has tightened its regulations on caregivers. To collect that hourly wage, workers have to complete an orientation and pass a background check. But when the contested guardian registered as her granddaughter’s caregiver, she didn’t have to do either. She, like absolutely anyone else the disabled person chooses, could simply sign up.

This isn’t unsurprising in a field that is wildly unregulated, at least on the private side. To practice nonmedical home care in California, all you need is a business license. Add to the mix the fact that recipients of this care are often aged, seriously ill or disabled, and you have a recipe for fraud. Last year, the Bohemian reported on a similar case, in which a caregiver disappeared with $22,000 of her elderly client’s money. One of the clients suffered from severe Alzheimer’s, and died soon after her caregiver fled.

And while different laws govern the industry across the public-private spectrum, the murky gray area of who exactly functions as the employer is a common thread. In the world of private home care, referral agencies can collect a hefty portion of a care worker’s hourly wage without providing benefits or workers’ compensation because, technically, the client can be defined as their employer.

“The state of California has some loophole laws,” says Marc Winter, the president of Hired Hands Homecare, a full-service agency that does act as an employer to its caregivers. “Referral agencies can basically farm out caregivers, and everything else is between the caregiver and the senior.”

However, Winter says, the broader implications of this employment triangle aren’t always apparent to all parties involved—especially if the person functioning as an employer has a debilitating disease.

“With the Guerrero case, that’s kind of coming into play,” he says, acknowledging that referral agencies and IHSS are structured in a similar manner.

If the case is successful in its second go-round, it could mean upheaval for the county program.

“It would fundamentally change the IHSS program if the lawsuit was successful,” Kalijan says. “It would change the part about the consumer being the employer; it would change the county’s responsibility; it would change the way providers work with overtime as a consideration. At the minimum, there would have to be state law change, and that would have a tremendous impact on local operations.”

Could this change trickle out into the private industry, sometimes shaped in the same way?

Perhaps, according to Hoffman.

“It’s expounding upon the whole nature of the relationship between employer and employee,” he says. “Any cases that deal with joint employers could possibly be applicable, if, by analogy, they’re doing the same things as the county.”

Whatever the outcome, Hoffman agrees that the case has a far-reaching effect.

“It doesn’t just apply to this county,” he says.

Patz & Hall

On a 25-year anniversary, everything old is new again

Still Too Big

Can big banks ever be prosecuted?

Sashimi Dreams

Does Shige dream of sushi the same way Jiro dreams of sushi? Shigekazu Mori, former sushi chef at Hiro—the best restaurant in Rohnert Park and one of the top sushi bars in the North Bay—has opened his own joint in downtown Cotati. In the old Nagomi spot, Shige Sushi replaces Nagomi as Cotati's raw, pesca-vegetarian dining option. Inside, it's visually...

Letters to the Editor: March5, 2013

Letters to the Editor: March5, 2013

When Trees Get Saved

Preservation Ranch will officially be preserved. As announced last week, a conservation group will purchase the 20,000-acre plot of forest in northwestern Sonoma County, effectively derailing a much-contested plan to clear-cut the land for vineyard development. The total purchase price for the property is reportedly $24.5 million, $4 million less than the $28.5 million purchase price in 2004. Leading the purchase...

Rock ‘n’ Shock

What's that creeping up near the Sonoma County airport—a TV horror sitcom?

Short and Sweet

One-page plays whiz by at SSU

Scientology Slam

Haunted by his cult ancestry, Jamie DeWolf visits Sebastopol with words as weapons

Miller Time

Rebecca Miller to speak at Copperfield's

Who’s Responsible?

A Sonoma County lawsuit over unpaid wages could radically alter the structure of in-home care
11,084FansLike
4,606FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow