Profile: Loudon Wainwright III in Petaluma

0

music & nightlife |

Everyman With A Guitar: Loudon Wainwright III in search of universal truths

By Bruce Robinson

Forty years into his career/lifestyle as an itinerant troubadour, Loudon Wainwright III is enjoying another up-tick in his public profile, courtesy of his work on the soundtrack for director Judd Apatow’s summer comedy, Knocked Up. Songs from the film also form the basis of Wainwright’s latest recording, Strange Weirdos, which has been praised as some of the songwriter’s best work in years.

But the job didn’t arrive just out of the blue. “Judd is a guy I’d worked with before as an actor,” Wainwright recounts by phone from the East coast. “I was in a television show he had a couple of years ago called Undeclared.” That short-lived Fox sitcom casting grew out of Apatow’s long-standing appreciation for Wainwright’s music, and a more recent concert date gave the director some ideas for his newest project.

“He heard a couple of the songs, ‘Grey in L.A.’ and ‘Passion Play,’ which he felt fit into the theme of his movie,” says Wainwright, “and so he said, ‘Why don’t you do the whole enchilada?'” Loudon quickly recruited songwriter and producer Joe Henry as his collaborator for the project, and went to work.

Extracted from the film and presented on their own merits, the songs fit comfortably into the well-established Wainwright mold, a singular distillation of wry humor and brutally honest self-examination that is almost always offered from a first-person perspective.

“Well, I’m always thinking of me,” he admits with a nervous chuckle. “But you see, what happens to me is not unusual to what happens to you and to other people. So I can write about me, but it applies to every man and/or woman. There’s nothing unusual about my life; it’s been a rather mundane existence. But like everybody’s life, there’s a lot of big important things that’ve happened in it and I write about it, and I think people recognize and identify with the songs because that stuff’s happened to them, too.”

In addition to providing the soundtrack, Wainwright also makes a brief acting appearance in Knocked Up, just as he did in Apatow’s previous picture, The 40-Year-Old Virgin. “I thought I wanted to be an actor,” he shrugs, “and occasionally I am.”

So is that Loudon Wainwright we see entertaining onstage just another role he plays? “It’s what I do,” he says matter-of-factly. “It’s a show I give and have been giving since 1968, so that’s almost 40 years. It’s evolved and changed from what it was, as I have. I’m not quite the same person I was when I started in 1968.

“But, uh . . . yes. The answer is yes.”

Loudon Wainwright III appears at the Mystic Theater on Saturday, Sept. 8, at 8pm. 23 Petaluma Blvd. N., Petaluma. $22; 18 and over. 707.765.2121




FIND A MUSIC REVIEW

Taste of Marin

0

What was the most delicious part of Taste of Marin, the posh fundraiser held Aug. 26 at the historic St. Vincent’s School for Boys in San Rafael?Perhaps it was the truly worthy cause: raising money to support the Marin Agricultural Land Trust, Marin Farmers Markets and Marin Organic in their quest to protect the area’s agricultural heritage along with the farmers and ranchers who keep it all going. No surprise, the $150-a-ticket evening was sold-out.It might have been the deluxe reception, held in the front courtyard and brimming with savory hors d’oeuvres, wines and displays of Marin’s best local edibles, hosted by the very talent who grew the ingredients and the chefs who prepared them.

What was the most delicious part of Taste of Marin, the posh fundraiser held Aug. 26 at the historic St. Vincent’s School for Boys in San Rafael?Perhaps it was the truly worthy cause: raising money to support the Marin Agricultural Land Trust, Marin Farmers Markets and Marin Organic in their quest to protect the area’s agricultural heritage along with the farmers and ranchers who keep it all going. No surprise, the $150-a-ticket evening was sold-out.It might have been the deluxe reception, held in the front courtyard and brimming with savory hors d’oeuvres, wines and displays of Marin’s best local edibles, hosted by the very talent who grew the ingredients and the chefs who prepared them.

Such delicacies! We nibbled on roasted plantains stuffed with vegetables under a mantle of melting cheese from Sol Food in San Rafael, and sweet rabbit sausage from Devil’s Gulch Ranch. We slurped tiny shot glasses of oyster-jalapeño ceviche from Drake’s Bay Oyster Farm (divine with a sip of Champagne from Pt. Reyes Vineyards), and ravaged entire legs of goat, lamb and pork from Marin Sun Farms, plucking meat from the bone with our fingers. I’d never before had “wild food paté,” but here it was, crafted by Commonweal Gardens in Bolinas, and like a dense chutney of curly doc seed, nettle leaf, milk thistle seed, sunflower seed and plum slathered on an crisp apple slice.

Certainly it was the sit-down dinner, a new addition to the nine-year-old event. Under a nearly full harvest moon, we sat down to plates laden with Anna’s Daughters Bakery rye bread slathered with Straus Family Creamery butter, and cups of Marin Roots Farm tomato and McEvoy Ranch fennel velouté soup bobbing with homemade olive croutons and Fresh Run Farm basil.

For the next several hours, we feasted on eight more high-pedigree courses including a ravishing local wild king salmon with Little Organic Farm purple potatoes and Star Route Farms purslane in a green goddess dressing of Cow Track Ranch garlic and chives, followed by a salad of roasted Fresh Run Farm chioggia beets, Marin Roots Farm golden beets, Andante Dairy Acapella goat cheese and Cowgirl Creamery Mt. Tam cheese atop Star Route Farms mixed greens drizzled in Marshall’s Farm honey and McEvoy Ranch olive oil.

But absolutely, the tastiest part of the evening was the sales pitch my table received for membership in the nonprofit activity. As dinner began, a very attractive volunteer for one of the organizations seated herself at our table, and, sipping beer, extolled the virtues of her group with great encouragement for us to join. After a bit more beer, her extolment flipped to the virtues of the men such membership attracted—loudly pointing out, in fact, a nearby guest who’d joined, well, her at this same party last year (up against a wall of this very school, it turned out, and with nary a sign-up sheet in hand). More beer, and our passionate hostess was bidding on a raffle prize for a private tour of Mt. Tam’s back roads, described as being led by “stalwart young rangers” of the Marin Fire department (“Orgy!” she shrieked).

By the time I left, our saucy salesperson had one new male enrollee whispering in her ear, another tugging her arm for a whirl on the dance floor, and another at our table yelping “Me next!” Sold!

For more info, contact Marin Agricultural Land Trust (www.malt.org), Marin Farmers Markets (www.marinfarmersmarket.org) and Marin Organic (www.marinorganic.org)



SEARCH AVAILABLE RESERVATIONS & BOOK A TABLE

View All


Quick dining snapshots by Bohemian staffers.


Winery news and reviews.


Food-related comings and goings, openings and closings, and other essays for those who love the kitchen and what it produces.


Recipes for food that you can actually make.

Green Zone: Eco-News for Sonoma, Marin and Napa

September 5-11, 2007

you tried it lately?

If electric vehicles are not the “green” solution, if even good gas mileage is still bad gas mileage, then what is the best way to get around? Who are the real transportation eco-warriors? This line of questioning led me to the city bus system.

In 14 years of living in Sonoma County, the only bus I have ever ridden is the San Francisco Airporter. For the last six years, I’ve driven by the bus stop that’s a short half-mile walk from my house, and never once have I stood beside the rickety post that sits, desolate on Highway 116, surrounded by weeds. How hard can it be?

My new goal: to ride the bus to the Santa Rosa Transit Mall from Sebastopol, preferably starting from that lonely bus stop that is walking distance from my house, and then ride it back again. Bus schedules are available at the local library, so that’s where I get mine. I also call the transit line, where a city employee cheerfully helps me find my way from point A to point B. Unfortunately, that little bus stop, the one that I imagine myself standing next to as I wait patiently, stoically even, under the blazing sun for my bus to appear, only goes to Rohnert Park. If I want to get to Santa Rosa, I have to somehow travel the five miles into Sebastopol and catch my ride there. No big deal; I have a car. If I didn’t, well, the transit system would have already let me down.

I park my car a couple of blocks from the Sebastopol Post Office, jog down to the bus stop and sit down to wait. A nice-looking young man waits next to me. After a few minutes of silence, he asks me if he can smoke. I say, “Sure, but can I ask you a couple of questions?” and we go from there. A 19-year-old West County native, Matthew Thomas, has been utilizing the public bus system for the last four years. In Matthew’s opinion, the system has been going seriously downhill. This used to be the easiest way to get around, he tells me, but now, with the consistent schedule changes, unpredictable arrival times and route cutbacks, riding the bus is no longer an easy solution. “Oh,” Matthew adds with a touch of cynicism, “and they’re always late.”

Our bus is, indeed, 10 minutes late, but once it arrives, proves to be quite serviceable. With an 18-passenger capacity, the bus is a little less than half full. I take a seat in the back and am soon lulled to sleep as we bounce and speed down the highway, making it to the transit mall in just under 15 minutes.

By the time I disembark, I’m feeling pleased. Refreshed by my catnap, I’m now sure that riding the bus isn’t so bad, as long as I don’t need to depend on it specifically. For instance, if I had no car and a bad limp, I would have a hell of a time getting to Santa Rosa every day for work. But considering my privileged position, I can afford to be flexible. Then I look at the posted schedules and realize that the next bus heading for Sebastopol doesn’t leave for three hours and that it will be a 40-minute trip back. Apparently, bus travel on a Saturday was not the spiffiest idea.

In order to spare myself the tedium, I call some friends and arrange for them to pick me up in their family postal truck/RV that they run on biodiesel. (The transit mall, by the way, is notably free of fumes despite the buses pulling in and out. This is no doubt due to the fact that all of the buses run on natural gas, as opposed to the stinking, black fume-spewing diesel buses of my childhood.)

The postal truck eventually arrives. I board and we roar back to Sebastopol with both side doors open, the highway spinning below our feet. Just shy of town, we stop at the Chevron station on Highway 12 that recently began selling biodiesel. We’re not the only ones filling up, and with over 2,000 gallons of biodiesel per month being sold from this particular station, it’s heartening to witness firsthand the community interest in alternative fuels. Biodiesel may have its drawbacks, but it is grown and processed in the U.S. and reduces carbon emissions by a reported 48 percent. At $3.79 a gallon, compared to $3.09 for a gallon of diesel, I guess one could say that it had better.

So, I need a car to catch the bus, and I need a diesel to buy biodiesel, and I need a certain level of generosity and willingness to sacrifice convenience to do either. But think about it: if every single adult in the North Bay made a personal commitment to ride the bus just once a week, that could make a huge difference. In fact, the counties would probably have to add a bunch of new lines just to accommodate us all, which would make life easier for real bus riders, like Matthew. Besides, it’s relaxing to ride the bus. You don’t have to worry, road rage falls away and as long as the buses are clean, the lull of community travel can truly surround one in a soothing, low-emissions bubble of serenity.

Find out more about your local transit system by visiting wwwsctransit.com

707.576.7433

www.marintransit.org

415.256.8832

www.nctpa.net

707.259.8631


Letters to the Editor

August 22-September 4, 2007

What’s Right, What’s Easy?

In response to Peter Byrne’s column, “Muggles, Arise!” (Aug. 15), I hasten to remind Mr. Byrne that one shouldn’t judge a book by how it’s covered in the media. From the start, Harry Potter has been mischaracterized by corporate interests as a kids’ book about sorcery. No doubt this mischaracterization is due to the subversive philosophy that Rowling subtly delivers to her readers. Rowling has said that, to her, the moral significance of the tales is “the choice between what is right and what is easy,” explaining that “tyranny [is] started by people being apathetic and taking the easy route and suddenly finding themselves in deep trouble.”

Pity poor Harry Potter. He knows that Voldemort is back, but is ridiculed by the press and government. Most of his school is turned against him because they only know what the media and their leaders promote. The book raises an interesting question: What would you do if your government were infiltrated by enemies of freedom and liberty? In Harry’s case, he organizes a forbidden group to resist the evil. Far from being just a dumb kids’ book, Harry Potter is likely to be the one cultural event of the century that the world will share globally. Its popularity and the message of choosing to do what is right, no matter how harsh the personal consequences, makes it the possibly the most subversive and influential book since the Bible. God knows that the messages in that book, like “The truth will set you free” and “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” are not views that our current leaders promote.

John Rose, Santa Rosa

Wizards, Unite!

Silly Peter Byrne! To say that we’re all Muggles and the elite are the wizards is simplistic and just plain wrong. Those of us who engage in radical creativity as activist writers, songsters, punk rockers, dancers, poets and green architects; who create alternative media, are playwrights, graffiti artists, conscious rappers, cop watchers, open mic’ers, “burners” and bioneers are all wizards, for we deal in the magic of imagination to create social change.

It’s those who have never questioned reality, who sit like lumps in front of TVs and are obedient consumers, who are Muggles. Behind the wheels of every SUV sits a Muggle.

J. K. Rowling is stirring up the powerful latent magic of creative transformation within us, for we truly are in an epic struggle. The Dark Side certainly has its wizards, who, through cunning and deceit, have attained positions of great power. We can and must outwit them! Why, the Republicans are now running R. G. Voldemort for president.

Forest Staggs, Petaluma

Peter spends each of the precious 800 words allotted him this week rebutting these two letters. See “The Byrne Report,” p9.

Not one or t’other

Did I miss something (Letters, Aug. 22)? Does there have to be a choice between “Ask Sydney” and Rob Brezsny? Sydney is solid and answers a few questions in a refreshingly earthy manner. Rob is a poet and guides us with rich analogy and humor and addresses the 12 astrological paths. The work is different! Rob was my lure to the Bohemian. Don’t lose me.

Andee Kobus-Sheard , Santa Rosa

If we are foolish enough to misprint or forget to print Rob Brezsny’s Free Will Astrology, we are immediately punished by having to read his horoscope to legions over the phone. There is no way that we would take the misguided step of offing our favorite Marin-based astrologer; this ain’t no “either or.” Sydney wanted to leave. We miss her too, but that’s the last word.

Dept. of forehead-slapping

In the magnificent round-up otherwise known as Fall Arts Listings (“Fall into Arts,” Aug. 22), we made two remarkable errors—remarkable, that is, for their sheer stupidity.

We have received many, many, many notices that Napa’s River Festival (formerly set for Sept. 2) has been cancelled this year, yet we doggedly printed notice of it. Our failure in regards to Face to Face’s Art for Life annual auction was more internally egregious. We had the listing, wrong dates; we had the listing, wrong price; we had an image to support the listing, Chaka Khan went there instead. And lo, when we went to print, no listing at all! Please mark Sept. 6&–8 on the calendar for this 20th anniversary fundraiser featuring 20 new artists. Still at Santa Rosa’s Friedman Center, the auction proper is slated for Saturday, Sept. 8; tickets are $75. For details, go to www.f2f.org.

The Ed.

embarrassed, contrite and strangely hungry for canapes


Harvard racism test

0

08.29.07

People don’t know themselves,” says Brian Nosek, “as well as it feels like we know ourselves.”

Speaking from the psychology department at the University of Virginia, Nosek should know. He’s developed an online test that’s caused people around the world to shake their fists, bang the keyboard and shudder in resentment when presented with results that go against the very core of their values. Nosek’s research never comes right out and asks, although there’s nonetheless an underlying question at play.

What if, deep down, we are all racist?

Enter Project Implicit, designers of the online Implicit Association Test (IAT), hosted at Harvard University, which aims to dig beneath the surface of the mind by measuring automatic responses to images quickly flashed on the screen. Designed by Anthony Greenwald, a psychology professor at the University of Washington, the IAT was co-developed with Nosek, a co-principal investigator of Project Implicit.

Harvard’s website contains 14 different IATs for biases regarding weight, age, sexuality and disability, but by far, the race test is the most popular—and provocative. At the start of the IAT, test takers answer questions about their feelings toward white and black people, along with some general inquiries to the person’s character—how impulsive they may see themselves, how they feel about human equality. After a basic warm-up sorting faces and words, the real task begins—sorting white and black faces into groups of “good” and “bad” along with words like “nasty,” “glorious,” “hurt,” “love,” “failure” and “happy.”

Taking the test can be extremely maddening. At times, it forces the testee to lump black faces with words like “evil” and “horrible,” destroying the honed alignment of what hopefully are our basic humanitarian values. But what we think may be a difficult association to make turns out to be easier than we realize; the Project Implicit website keeps a tally of split-second time results, and most respondents react quicker while sorting black faces with “awful” and “agony” than with “pleasure” and “laughter.”

In other words, everyone is racist. Right?

Not at all, says Nosek. “Racism is explicit,” he says. “Racism is me saying, ‘I don’t like this group because I think they’re rotten and ugly and smelly.’ That’s not what the IAT measures; it’s not telling us what the truth is in someone’s mind.”

What it does measure is mental association and “automatic preference,” the term used in test results (i.e., “You have a moderate automatic preference for European Americans over African Americans”). No one likes this terminology very much, but Nosek is clear about the subconscious definition of “automatic preference” as used in the test, citing his own testing experience as an example.

“I hold the idea of treating everyone as individuals and not by the color of their skin,” he says, “and nonetheless, it’s easier for me to group ‘black’ with ‘bad’ and ‘white’ with ‘good’ than the other way around. That suggests something very surprising and humbling to me; one is that I don’t have complete control over my mind. There’s stuff in my mind that exists there without my permission, without necessarily my desiring it and without my necessarily being able to control it.

“And so what that introduces,” he continues, “is that I may be behaving in ways that are inconsistent with my values without even really recognizing it. That is something that we don’t like to think about as humans. We want to think we’re in control of our minds and our behavior.”

In other words, the test results really aren’t as personal as we may think. While our conscious mind processes the relationships among stimuli it receives and scrutinizes their worth, our implicit mind—the side the IAT aims to probe—merely records its environment, making the test more of a barometer of the world around us than of our true makeup.

Still, many people feel that they’re accused of racism when their test result denotes a moderate automatic preference for white people over black people or vice versa, and almost all of them have theories about the IAT’s flaws.

“My biggest problem,” writes one online user, “is that the real response they’re measuring is how quickly they can get me to associate positive terms with my right hand and negative terms with my left, then how well I cope when they mix things up. I see very little here to persuade me that they’ve accurately measured what they claim to have measured.”

Nosek himself thought of this after he first took the IAT, and after investigation determined that the switch-up only provides for a 3 percent effect on test performance. “It feels like it must be the whole explanation when we do it,” he says, “but it actually has a very small impact, and we’ve added some procedural modifications to reduce that impact even further.”

Nosek himself welcomes debate on the IAT (it gets “everyday people to think like scientists,” he says), but more important, he says, is the communication and self-awareness the test can inspire. Whatever one may think of the IAT test, it nonetheless serves as a catalyst for us to face our own biases.

“There’s a lot of interesting social issues that we want to wrestle with as a society and also individually,” Nosek says. “This test can be a vehicle for promoting that discussion, and I don’t think conversations like that are ever harmful.”

The question remains: are we all racist?

The Project Implicit tests can be found online at https://implicit.harvard.edu.implicit.


Chocolate Rain

0

08.29.07

I don’t usually champion YouTube videos, but the surprising and hilarious success of Tay Zonday’s 7-million-views-and-counting “Chocolate Rain” has brought me great joy, and it’s been fueling many a buckled-over guffaw to everyone I know who discovers it. The reactions are always fivefold:

1. This is the funniest shit I’ve seen in a long time.

2. OK, no, wait, this is the funniest shit I’ve seen, period.

3. As repetitive as this beat is, it’s actually pretty fresh.

4. You know what? This is totally creative and one-of-a-kind.

5. Lemme listen to it again. I think he might actually be singing about something important.

It’s rare to find entertainment, creativity and social commentary wrapped so tightly together, especially with an arrangement that all but gets down on its knees and begs the listener to join in; everyone who hears “Chocolate Rain” wants to start making up their own verses. It’s the new haiku: come up with nine syllables, and increase their contextual power with a James Earl Jones&–style recitation sandwiched between strange gurglings of the words “Chocolate Rain” (my favorite syllables so far, from one of hundreds of YouTube tributes by Darth Vader, Tré Cool and a fecal monster named “Turdzilla,” are “Barry Zito Colonoscopy”).

Also, the music’s not as redundant as it may appear on first listening. If I’m not mistaken, Zonday plays swift, arpeggiated sixteenth notes that fly all over the upper keys, and listen to his left hand—it’s hiding right around middle C, playing tricky almost-triplets against the right hand, something I think Bud Powell would get a kick out of. Then, somewhere around the chorus, he drops the left hand and pounds low octaves with an entirely different and more complex syncopation, like a production trick off Dr. Dre’s The Chronic.

Which takes us to the lyrics, the sweetest surprise of all: “Chocolate Rain,” far from a collection of random nonsequiturs, turns out to be a metaphor for racism. Zonday is so goofy-looking and has such a weird-ass voice, we don’t expect him to be singing about insurance rates, test scores and criminal law. Yet after a few listens, his poetic indictment hits right up there with Phil Ochs, bringing to a new, tech-addled generation a list of unanswered questions that are unfortunately very old.

Song of the year in my opinion.


The Bigotry Tour

0

08.29.07

Early this summer, one of our contributing writers was out near the Russian River interviewing a woman of Puerto Rican descent. On the way there, he passed a private residence outfitted to look like a Civil War fort, replete with a Confederate flag and a white dummy in a gun tower, pointing a rifle out to the trees. Upon arriving at his subject’s home, he asked her about the fortlike structure. She passionately related how, as a woman of color, she feels threatened by this residence and what she perceives to be its racist posturing.

I’ve passed this place many times and only thought of it from a feminist perspective—sure wouldn’t want to be the woman on that property, I’ve muttered, imagining the many men who must certainly live there, striding around like soldiers hunkered against an enemy. As for our reporter, he had never before thought anything of it at all; as a white man, he’s top of the chain, what novelist Tom Wolfe likes to call a “master of the universe,” and it takes more than a wooden fence and stuffed mannequin to unnerve him.

But the story got us all thinking about how our discrete experiences of the same thing differ wildly according to our status in the world and how, even in a supposedly progressive bastion like the North Bay, prejudice flourishes, often in ways many of us never notice. Perhaps the curious props that decorate the faux fort have no meaning at all. And perhaps it’s merely true that prejudice flourishes wherever humans do. We’re not sure.

We wanted to know more about your experiences, so we sent out a mailer and posted a survey on our website asking you to relate your brush with otherness in the North Bay. On the following pages, we reprint a sampling of the comments we received as well as other stories on prejudice and racism not only in our area, but in our world. We think enough of this topic that we’ve rearranged this week’s paper to better accommodate what we’ve tenderly begun to call our “bigotry package.” We hope that it prompts discussion in your home as it has in ours. The discussion needn’t end here. Write ed****@******an.com with your impressions and thoughts. This is an issue that won’t be going away any time soon.—Gretchen Giles

I FEEL LIKE “the other” more often than not here in Marin County, with the exception of parts of San Rafael and in West Marin. I am one of a few Mexican-Americans where I live in Marin. In fact, there are so few of us that I don’t think that we even constitute a percent of the population. However, Marin is a fairly open-minded place concerning most political views, but when the subject of immigration comes up, things tend to get a bit more conservative, and this is one of the several instances where I definitely feel out of place here.

When my wife and I and our then-infant son came to Marin 15 years ago to look for a place to rent, our first appointment was in, of all places, Fairfax. I dropped my wife and son off at the house while I went to park. After I had parked around the corner, I walked back to the house and found my wife chatting with the owner. He was all smiles and I could hear him telling her how she’ll love the house and location (my wife is white, and blonde to boot).

Once I approached, I could see the owner’s face change dramatically as I smiled and put my hand out while my wife introduced us. He weakly shook my hand, frowning and squinting at me and asked me to repeat my name, which I did, still smiling. He then said, “That’s a Mexican name, ain’t it?”

I told him that it was and he then began to nervously apologize for making us drive all that way, but the house had already been rented. My wife was shocked. I just chuckled. That was 15 years ago in Fairfax, which is still unbelievable to me.

Another instance of racism that impacts me heavily is when I hear disparaging remarks about immigrants, especially Latino immigrants. When I voice my opinion on the subject, I get, “Oh, we don’t think of you as Hispanic,” as if that’s supposed to be a compliment because I am lighter-complexioned. Because I don’t speak with an accent? Because I am college-educated? The other remark that is just as offensive is: “Oh, I don’t mean you. I mean real Mexicans.” Once again, is this supposed to be some sort of compliment? By not being from Mexico but raised Mexican as a first-generation Chicano I am, what? A fake Mexican?

Clearly, the individuals who say these things are probably not aware of the ignorance involved in such statements, but it is very hurtful and thoughtless nonetheless.—Jaime, Marin County

I AM A WHITE woman. I once dated a highly educated, incredibly sweet, fabulously articulate, beautifully dressed, impeccably polite and very successful young lawyer who also happens to be black. I had no idea that here in the North Bay there was such archaic and ignorant behavior going on toward our fellow human beings; this is a place I considered evolved and idyllic.

The many ways and everyday situations in which he was slighted, rudely ignored or blatantly targeted and/or insulted based on his skin color alone were truly astounding and rage-inducing for me to witness. If we were out to dinner, wait staff would ignore him entirely when he tried to get their attention, or take my order and then walk away before he ordered. He was targeted by police on Highway 101, getting pulled over for “speeding,” even though he was following traffic speeds. I will stop there, but the list goes on.

The worst of it for me: his enduring politeness in the face of these slights. There is no way I could handle myself with a modicum of the patience and tolerance he showed for these many injustices endured daily.—Anon, Sonoma

I GREW UP in Marin but went to college in Reno, a place where one would think an openly gay man would receive dirty looks and insults. But the only times I’ve experienced homophobia were in Marin, most recently in San Rafael a couple months back. I was walking hand in hand with a date, enjoying the summer stroll down Fourth Street when a guy in a pickup truck slowed down and yelled out “Faggots!” while flipping us off.—Nicholas, Novato

GROWING UP in San Rafael, I enjoyed the distinction of being the only Filipino student in school until I reached college. So when my high school’s African-American security guard, who use to harass us kids for no reason, called me a “fucking flip” my sophomore year, I thought it was just some outmoded slang from the ’70s. It was years later that I learned “flip” is a racial epithet for Filipino people, either an acronym for “fucking little island people” coined by U.S. soldiers during World War II or a derivative of the word Filipino, depending on whom you ask. Outweighing my anger, though, was my gratitude for having grown up in a place where such naiveté was possible. Interestingly, the security guard was discovered to be molesting students at a boys’ school nearby.—David, Novato

I USED TO WALK around Marin County feeling like I had a big sign on my forehead in bright red letters spelling “Other.” When I moved to Marin from the East Bay at age 18, it was a bit of a culture shock. I was not used to being in a community dominated by white faces, and sometimes I felt really out of place. I blamed racism for my discomfort, and I blamed my discomfort on white people.

But in reality, no white person ever directly said “Go home” or “You don’t belong here.” As a matter of fact, I have sometimes felt just as uncomfortable in all-black communities. Being a bi-racial and multicultural woman, sometimes I’ve struggled with feeling a full-fledged member of any group. That feeling was a lack of understanding on my part that I, as a human being, belong to everybody, and therefore I belong wherever my feet may stand. People’s opinions of me are their business. I no longer give anyone the power to make me feel like the “other.” As an active citizen in my community, no one’s opinion of me, my people or my history can penetrate what I know: I am a good person, a good mother, a conscientious neighbor, a lover of nature. —Amy, Novato

HAVING A cigarette with a few co-workers recently, a female colleague affectionately referred to my eyes as being “chinky.” Needless to say, all our jaws dropped. “What?” she said, truly confused by our reaction. We then informed the girl, an Asian immigrant herself, that “chink” is a slur and should never be uttered. She quickly apologized and thanked us for telling her. I know she didn’t mean it maliciously, but I shudder to think of how many times in previous company that she’d unwittingly offended with the word. Worse yet, I wondered where she first heard that word.—David, Novato

I JUST HAD an experience at work—a local community college—in which a Latino employee gave my boss shit for hiring a white dude (me). My boss fielded his phone call and defended my good name, but also kind of justified why I was chosen for the job (my skills, abilities, background, etc). This felt a little slimy. How would a Latina worker feel if a white colleague called up the Latina’s boss and said, in so many words, “Why’d you hire a person of color?” And if the Latina’s boss had said (in so many words and euphemisms), “Yes, I hired her and stand behind my decision. She’s Latina, but she has these great skills, abilities, etc.”

I had a similar experience when hired for a job in Marin City. I interviewed for the job, got the job by a telephone call telling me so, then got another call saying I didn’t have the job because the executive director wanted a black person for the job. Then a meeting was set up, which I thought was a second interview, and I met with the executive director and got the job. It was all very weird and, I believe, borderline illegal.

Both of these examples strike me as reverse discrimination, or what I call “institutionalized payback” or institutionalized discrimination. They both go against Dr. King’s hope that we judge each other solely on ability, skills, personality and not surface features. Ironically, both these incidents happened not to a person of color but to a white person, and not out on the streets but in a community-college setting and a nonprofit workplace in the so-called progressive North Bay. (It could be argued that lacking the ability to speak Spanish is cause for questioning my hiring choice, but my particular jobs have not directly necessitated that I speak Spanish—or be black, for that matter.)—Matt, Petaluma

I HATE RACISM so much that sometimes I do not even notice that it’s happening; that is to say that I feel in my gut, “He cannot actually mean that!” and assign another reason when I hear a racist comment. When I taught “at risk” teenagers, everyone I knew assumed that my classrooms must be primarily black. No! It’s a class question, and more and more the class of people who get sent to the school at which I taught, rather than at Phillips Exeter or Taft, are multiracial. The truth is that the same skills that make Bill Gates so successful can be used on the street to sell meth or crack and build an empire.—Ruby, Santa Rosa

INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, social prejudice and internalized racism are far too complicated to jot down in this format. They’re interrelated, yet different. All people are impacted by racism, even white people. All of us have something at stake. Racism and prejudice are like smog: we can’t see it when we are in it, yet it penetrates our pores and lungs and poisons us, eroding our mental, physical and spiritual health. Racism has impacted my life for sure, on many levels, but I have worked a lot on the internalized stuff. Due to that, a lot of the external stuff doesn’t stick as much as it used to.

—Amy, Novato


Jive, Live!

0

08.29.07

It all began when we were in a cafe in—get this—1993, wondering what the heck everyone around us was scribbling on about. Seated at counters and small tables, sprawled on benches and cross-legged on the floor, writers were humming away, marking up notebooks and unaware that such marvels as laptop computers soon awaited them. What are you writing about, we demanded. As it turns out, you were mostly writing about sex, which makes perfect sense to us.

So began the Bohemian‘s—we were then known as the Sonoma County Independent—annual Java Jive writing contest. (This year’s contest is scheduled to commence Sept. 26.) In honor of the North Bay’s luminous literary legacy, the Page on Stage reading this month—recorded for rebroadcast on KRCB 91.1-FM—salutes Java Jive with actors reading from the works that we’ve published over the years. It’s a synergy thing and we’re more than a little thrilled.

If you’ve ever been published in our Java Jive issue, you should be more than a little thrilled, too. At press time, we here in the Old Media have no idea what the lineup is for the Best of Java Jive, slated for Wednesday, Sept. 5, at the Glaser Center, 547 Mendocino Ave., Santa Rosa. 8pm. $5. 707.568.5381. See you there!


Museums and gallery notes.

Reviews of new book releases.

Reviews and previews of new plays, operas and symphony performances.

Reviews and previews of new dance performances and events.

Sizzling Tandoor in Santa Rosa

0

08.29.07

Editor’s note: First Bite is a new concept in restaurant writing. We invite you to come along with our writers as they—informed, intelligent eaters like yourselves—have a simple meal at an area restaurant, just like you do. This is not a go-three-times, try-everything-on-the-menu report; rather, this is a quick snapshot of a single experience.

“It’s a Culinary Nirvana Here!” boasts the sign at Sizzling Tandoor, a restaurant that’s flourished in downtown Santa Rosa for an admirable 20 years. And perhaps it is where true Nirvana lies now, since the restaurant of that name (Nirvana Indian Fusion Sanctuary), which for a short while occupied space directly across the street, closed last month.

I liked Nirvana. But I’ve got to say, after a recent feast at Tandoor, the best Indian restaurant has won. Even if our dinner service was interrupted for almost half an hour by a belly dancing display (note to management: I can eat and watch at the same time), leaving us ravenously chewing on the tablecloths after being taunted with a too-tiny plate of appetizers, I left happy, impressed and putting the place in my Rolodex of must-recommends.

My group ate just five entrées, which means that there are still 112 more dishes I would like to sample from the extensive menu. I didn’t find a misstep in the bunch, even finding consensus among a covey of companions who are generally pretty tough to please.

My brother, a hardcore saag snob, deemed Tandoor’s lamb version ($14.95) perfect, and it was: the meat ladled in a wet clump of fiery spinach curry kissed with cilantro. His girlfriend, who often painstakingly makes her own korma, was enraptured by the presence of crunchy cashews, pistachio and almonds in the creamy chicken sahi ($14.95). My sister, a vegetarian when the cooking is good enough to make the practice convenient, found great joy with bhindi masala ($9.95), an intricate stir-fry of julienned okra, onion, curry leaves, dry masala, mustard seeds, spices and cilantro.

Mom’s choice was a masterpiece, curiously described as “globules” that turned out to be fabulous falafel-like dumplings of homemade paneer cheese and vegetables stewed in a thick, savory onion and cashew gravy ($10.95).

My mixed grill ($21.95), meanwhile, brought the best of everything together on a small, sizzling platter overloaded with tandoori chicken and shrimp, chicken and lamb tikka, shish kabob and fish tikka. There were none of the dry, overcooked meats I’ve come across way too often; rather, these were expertly tender, juicy specimens, piled atop crunchy roasted vegetables.

We dipped and wrapped it all in pillowy naan plus a side of whole-wheat paratha ($3.25), and scooped forkfuls of it up with aromatic basmati rice studded with peas ($3.50).

To be fair, it was my own fault that the starter had left us starving. Next time, I’ll know to get several orders of the “assorted Indian snacks” ($7.95); the single serving wasn’t meant for five, and was too good to share anyway, with its flaky spiced potato-pea samosa, plump potato-cauliflower-eggplant pakoras, shish kabob, chicken tikka and crispy papadam.

No wonder Sizzling Tandoor has been Nirvana’s earthly home for almost two decades.

Sizzling Tandoor, 409 Mendocino Ave., Santa Rosa. Open Monday through Saturday for lunch; daily for dinner. 707.579.5999.


Quick-and-dirty dashes through North Bay restaurants. These aren’t your standard “bring five friends and order everything on the menu” dining reviews.

The Byrne Report

08.29.07

In a recent column, to the dismay of some of my dearest Bohemian readers, I disparaged the elitist worldview of Harry Potter’s creator, J. K. Rowling. Please allow me to elaborate.

In Potter-dom, technology is monopolized by wizard humans who lord it over genetically inferior humans known by the ugly sobriquet “Muggles.” Through magical violence, wizard warriors dominate such nonhuman “races” as goblins and elves. According to the neo-Nietzschean Rowling, positive social change emanates solely from the acts of supermen. Critics of my analysis of the noblesse-obliging Potter gestalt are eager to salvage a modicum of hope from Rowling’s framing of reality as forever capitalistic and racially determined—and, sadly, they fail.

The Potter works are powerful because they reflect reality. But if you want to fight the Dark Side, you must first recognize it. Bohemian reader Forest Staggs (see Letters, p6) writes that Rowling is “stirring up powerful latent magic of creative transformation.” The archetype-wielding author does tap our lust for social change, but Staggs errs in defining Muggles as “obedient consumers” driving SUVs. More aptly, carbon-burning American consumers are members of Wizard Nation; it is exploited Third World workers and peasants who are Muggled.

Wizard society is divided into upper and lower classes, with wealth being key to social position. Its comfy lifestyle is maintained by control over the ownership of wands, which are both the means of production and punishment. Weapon-wielding wizards deny systematically uneducated Muggles opportunities to change the real social order of which they are kept oblivious; Muggles who witness magic are mind-wiped. Their “democratically elected” officials are political puppets of the wizards. Please note that Rowling approves of social engineering in secret.

Another critic, John Rose (also Letters this week), finds the Potter corpus to be “possibly the most subversive and influential book since the Bible.” Nonsense. Karl Marx’s Capital or Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species or Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle fit that bill. The Old and New Testaments do not favor liberating the wretched of the earth, quite the opposite. Today, it is used to legitimize slaughter in occupied Iraq and occupied Palestine. Rowling, on the other hand, may actually oppose torture and chattel slavery, but that does not make her subversive, just another angst-ridden liberal mired in the mud of neocolonialism.

Averting his eyes from the true cause of suffering—that is, economic exploitation—Potter refights WW II ad nauseam. A “good” ruling class faction battles “bad” rich guys and saves the world for “freedom” and wizardly business as usual. Sorry, but we have heard that bit before. America and England won WW II, and look at the bloody messes they have made of things. Wake up Potter heads: Rowling favors plutocracy over genuine democracy.

And she is a racialist. Informed people understand that “race” is not biological; it is a political concept, a social construct, a phenomenologically induced fallacy that keeps the poor fighting the poor. The racialist Rowling defines humans, goblins and elves as separate “races” marked by biologically determined characteristics. Her unclean Goblins are born greedy, obsessed by love of gold and money. They are untrustworthy, they have bad table manners. They are employed by their wand-wielding Caucasian conquerors as bankers to the nobility. This grotesquely Shylockian metaphor is deeply rooted in British literature and European socioeconomics and Christian culture starting from the Middle Ages. In other words, Rowling’s dirty goblins are Jews.

House elves are good Negroes. They are cast as domestic slaves to white wizards, the wisest of whom sport blue eyes. Lucky house elves belong to liberal slave-owning wizards who have the option to “free” them by giving them a stinky sock. Dobby, who is Potter’s manumitted house elf (where, pray tell, are the field elves, out of sight picking cotton?) is so ridiculously grateful to his teenage master that he cheerfully sacrifices his life for him. Uncle Dobby’s Cabin, anyone?

Although human, the laboring Muggles are biologically and socially inferior to wizards. One out of a billion Muggles carries the genetic mutation (magic gene: smart gene) necessary to qualify for promotion into the wizard world. That slim chance of upward mobility apparently justifies the turning of a blind eye toward Rowling’s system of Muggle apartheid by her hand-wringing liberal devotees in the fascism-exporting countries.

Rowling’s social vision is so narrow, so constrained, so corporate-approved that to promote her tales as a source of political inspiration for liberation from tyranny makes as much sense as believing that Democrats will magically save us from military-industrialism.

Disgustingly, at the end of the final Potter book, Rowling’s flagrantly exposes her ideological agenda. Potter becomes a Christ cliché and wizardry is saved from its sins by his crucifixion and resurrection. Fundamentalist Christians can rejoice: Potter is Jesus. Barf.

The Byrne Report welcomes feedback. Write pb****@***ic.net.

or


Profile: Loudon Wainwright III in Petaluma

music & nightlife | Everyman With A Guitar: Loudon...

Green Zone: Eco-News for Sonoma, Marin and Napa

September 5-11, 2007you tried it lately?If electric vehicles are not the "green" solution, if even good gas mileage is still bad gas mileage, then what is the best way to get around? Who are the real transportation eco-warriors? This line of questioning led me to the city bus system. In 14 years of living in Sonoma County, the...

Letters to the Editor

August 22-September 4, 2007What's Right, What's Easy?In response to Peter Byrne's column, "Muggles, Arise!" (Aug. 15), I hasten to remind Mr. Byrne that one shouldn't judge a book by how it's covered in the media. From the start, Harry Potter has been mischaracterized by corporate interests as a kids' book about sorcery. No doubt this mischaracterization is due to...

Harvard racism test

08.29.07People don't know themselves," says Brian Nosek, "as well as it feels like we know ourselves." Speaking from the psychology department at the University of Virginia, Nosek should know. He's developed an online test that's caused people around the world to shake their fists, bang the keyboard and shudder in resentment when presented with results that go against the...

Chocolate Rain

08.29.07I don't usually champion YouTube videos, but the surprising and hilarious success of Tay Zonday's 7-million-views-and-counting "Chocolate Rain" has brought me great joy, and it's been fueling many a buckled-over guffaw to everyone I know who discovers it. The reactions are always fivefold: 1. This is the funniest shit I've seen in a long time.2. OK, no, wait, this...

The Bigotry Tour

08.29.07Early this summer, one of our contributing writers was out near the Russian River interviewing a woman of Puerto Rican descent. On the way there, he passed a private residence outfitted to look like a Civil War fort, replete with a Confederate flag and a white dummy in a gun tower, pointing a rifle out to the trees. Upon...

Jive, Live!

08.29.07It all began when we were in a cafe in—get this—1993, wondering what the heck everyone around us was scribbling on about. Seated at counters and small tables, sprawled on benches and cross-legged on the floor, writers were humming away, marking up notebooks and unaware that such marvels as laptop computers soon awaited them. What are you writing about,...

Sizzling Tandoor in Santa Rosa

08.29.07Editor's note: First Bite is a new concept in restaurant writing. We invite you to come along with our writers as they—informed, intelligent eaters like yourselves—have a simple meal at an area restaurant, just like you do. This is not a go-three-times, try-everything-on-the-menu report; rather, this is a quick snapshot of a single experience."It's a Culinary Nirvana Here!" boasts...

The Byrne Report

08.29.07In a recent column, to the dismay of some of my dearest Bohemian readers, I disparaged the elitist worldview of Harry Potter's creator, J. K. Rowling. Please allow me to elaborate. In Potter-dom, technology is monopolized by wizard humans who lord it over genetically inferior humans known by the ugly sobriquet "Muggles." Through magical violence, wizard warriors dominate such...
11,084FansLike
4,446FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow