Sonoma Sheriff’s Office responds to set of questions about Sheriff Freitas meeting with Jeff Sessions

Below, Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office public-information officer Sgt. Spencer Crum addresses a set of questions posed this morning to SCSO about Sheriff Steve Freitas’ meeting with AG-designate Jeff Sessions.

BOHEMIAN: The Examiner story noted that the sheriffs who met with Sessions support him as the AG-designate and “back Sessions’ stance on immigration.” I did not see Mr. Freitas directly quoted in the article saying that so I am giving him the chance here to let our readers know whether he does support Sessions, and some clarity on what Mr. Freitas actually supports. For example, Sessions supports deportation of so-called Dreamers under DACA. What’s the Sheriff’s view on DACA?
SGT. CRUM: Sheriff Freitas believes in cooperating with our federal counterparts to keep communities safe. His viewpoints have widely been shared with the community and can be found on a video on the front page of our website. Sheriff Freitas has a policy that Sheriff Deputies cannot ask anyone about their immigration status and we do not assist ICE in immigration raids, based solely on immigration. If someone is committing crimes, we will do our best to enforce the law or assist any law enforcement agency.
BOHEMIAN: How did this meeting come about? Was Mr. Freitas invited to join the other Sheriffs at the request of Mr. Sessions? I’m curious about how this unfolded and who and what prompted a meeting of these six sheriffs.
SGT. CRUM: Sheriff Freitas will be back next week and can respond how the meeting with Sessions came about.
BOHEMIAN: What is Sheriff Freitas’ view of any state, city, or county-wide effort to enact policies that generally fall under the rubric of “sanctuary.” Does Mr. Freitas support any local, state or county efforts aimed at shielding or undocumented aliens from their potential interactions with ICE agents?
SGT. CRUM: directs to see answer to first question.
BOHEMIAN: What is Sheriff Freitas’ view of Mr. Sessions long-held anti-cannabis viewpoints? Does he share Mr. Sessions view that cannabis should continue to be outlawed at the federal level?
SGT. CRUM: Sheriff Freitas doesn’t answer to Sessions’ views. Sheriff Freitas’ opinion has always been that marijuana possession, cultivation, use, transportation and sales should be illegal. This has been widely publicized through the Proposition 64 campaign and hasn’t changed.
BOHEMIAN: Who paid for this trip to Washington, and if this was a taxpayer-funded trip, what was the total cost of the trip to meet with Sessions? Did any other members of SCSO also take this trip, and was the sheriff part of any meetings with the president himself during this trip?
SGT. CRUM: This is taxpayer funded trip. No other members of the Sheriff’s Department accompanied him. President Trump addressed the group, welcoming them and expressed his support of local law enforcement entities. Sheriff Freitas did not have any meetings with the President. Cost hasn’t been determined as he is still on the trip. We have no responsive records.
BOHEMIAN: Was there any notification or advance notice, a press release or any public announcement, from SCSO, that announced Mr. Freitas’ trip and visit with Mr. Sessions?
SGT. CRUM: No announcement was done ahead of time. Sheriff Freitas attends these conferences on a yearly basis.
BOHEMIAN: As elected Sheriff of Sonoma County, can the Sheriff provide a statement or comment that lays any of his specific concerns that may have arisen in the weeks since Trump took office, especially as those concerns might impact on LE in Sonoma County and/or in addressing issues where the county’s undocumented population intersects with law enforcement?
SGT. CRUM: directs to response to first question.
BOHEMIAN: Lastly and very generally, why did Sheriff Freitas meet with the AG-designate given that he hadn’t been confirmed at the time of the meeting?
SGT. CRUM: Sheriff Freitas met with Senator Sessions to discuss opportunities to keep our community safe and understand how local and federal agencies would best work together to achieve ultimate goal of community safety.

Sonoma sheriff meets with Sessions in DC, questions ensue

The conservative Washington Examiner reported this week that Sonoma County Sheriff Steve Freitas was among six California sheriffs who met with Attorney General-designate Jeff Sessions, with a headline that noted the sheriffs “back Sessions stance on immigration.”

In fairness to Freitas, the story does not quote him saying that he backs Sessions’ stance on immigration. It doesn’t quote him at all, in fact. The article was mostly framed around county-level interactions with Federal immigration officials (ICE) and undocumented immigrants in the county lockup. And the elected sheriff of course has an obligation and a responsibility to understand the intentions of the incoming AG—regardless of party or the fact that the man in the White House is kind of a maniac.

The Examiner story appeared just as the GOP-ruled U.S. Senate was putting the gag on Elizabeth Warren for reading a letter from Coretta Scott King that highlighted Sessions’ vote-suppression history and generally lousy attitude toward elder minorities. The Alabama Senator will likely be confirmed this week.

Here’s a money quote from the Examiner story: “After their meeting, the sheriffs said they are seeking Sessions’ support once he becomes attorney general as expected on Wednesday. That includes working together on several California-specific problems that are tying their hands when it comes to keeping illegal immigrants convicted or charged with major crimes detained in order to work with federal immigration authorities.”

This morning I sent off a set of questions to the Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office public information officer, Sgt. Crum, seeking some further information about the trip undertaken by Sheriff Freitas. Here’s the gist of what I sent, which was also forwarded to the public-record compliance administrator at the county.

* The Examiner story noted that the sheriffs who met with Sessions support him as the AG-designate and “back Sessions’ stance on immigration.” I did not see Mr. Freitas directly quoted in the article saying that so I am giving him the chance here to let our readers know whether he does support Sessions, and some clarity on what Mr. Freitas actually supports. For example, Sessions supports deportation of so-called “DREAMERS” under DACA. What’s the Sheriff’s view on DACA?

* How did this meeting come about? Was Mr. Freitas invited to join the other Sheriffs at the request of Mr. Sessions? I’m curious about how this unfolded and who and what prompted a meeting of these six sheriffs.

* What is Sheriff Freitas’ view of any state, city, or county-wide effort to enact policies that generally fall under the rubric of “sanctuary” protections against federal immigration raids or other efforts directed at the undocumented? Does Mr. Freitas support any local, state or county efforts aimed at shielding or undocumented aliens from their potential interactions with ICE agents?

* What is Sheriff Freitas’ view of Mr. Sessions long-held anti-cannabis viewpoints? Does he share Mr. Sessions view that cannabis should continue to be outlawed at the federal level?

* Who paid for Sheriff Freitas’ trip to Washington, and if this was a taxpayer-funded trip, what was the total cost of this trip to meet with Sessions? Did any other members of SCSO also take the trip to D.C., and was the sheriff part of any meetings with the president himself during this trip?

* Was there any notification or advance notice, a press release or any public announcement, from SCSO, that announced Mr. Freitas’ trip and the scheduled visit with Mr. Sessions?

* As elected Sheriff of Sonoma County, can the sheriff provide a statement or comment that lays any of his specific concerns that may have arisen in the weeks since Trump took office, especially as those concerns might impact on law enforcement in Sonoma County and/or in addressing issues where the county’s undocumented population intersects with law enforcement?

Will keep readers posted once I hear back from SCSO.

Walt Ranch Wrangle

0

Opponents of a massive vineyard proposed in the hills northeast of Napa have filed suit to block the project. At risk, say opponents, are some 300 acres of pristine forest, riparian and grassland habitat spread across the 2,300-acre ranch.

Walt Ranch owners Craig and Kathryn Hall own Hall Winery, and are a known quanitity in philanthropic circles. Kathryn Hall was U.S. ambassador to Austria under Bill Clinton.

The Napa County Board of Supervisors approved their hillside vineyard project in December. In response, the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), the Sierra Club and loal groups sued the county over what they call an inadequate review of cumulative environmental impacts associated with the project—new roads, more pressure on groundwater aquifers, pesticides, fencing and “activities that will impair water quality in streams crucial to the survival of local salmon, reptiles and amphibians,” according to the Oakland-based CBD.

The Halls took to Facebook to assure locals, “we continue to want to be good neighbors, and have worked hard to refine the vineyard plans to make this is an environmentally sensitive project.” The proposed acreage has been whittled down to 209 acres from 365 in the original 2008 proposal.

Not enough, say opponents, who will meet Feb. 12 in
St. Helena to plan their next move.

Sonic Fertilizer

Long before I came into “the industry,” an old friend participated in various international cannabis competitions and walked away with some awards. His explanation for his success was simple: play jazz for the plants. John Coltrane, to be precise. But only between 3 and 6am. Huh? Only early in the morning? What about Miles Davis? McCoy Tyner? Is Chuck Mangione good for anything?

Recalling that story, it seemed time for an update. There is some deep, thought-provoking plant science out there. But reminding myself that music, not science, was the topic, I quickly wriggled out of the scientific rabbit hole and began the flimsiest of investigative journalism.

In general, reggae, specifically Bob Marley, is the default music of choice for cultivation. Classical, namely Beethoven and Mozart, got a few mentions from people I spoke to. Apparently, “Moonlight Sonata” is a standard on the cannabis-cultivation set list. Brahms is a no-go. Sad trombone.

Probing a bit deeper, I asked if there was different music for different qualities. Do you play the same music for growth, aromatics and potency, or does it change? What’s optimal for planting, flowering and pre-harvest phases? Here are some responses that do nothing to answer those questions:

“Music? Yeah, some, but I don’t want to raise any uneducated plants. I pipe in an hour of local news every day. . . . I want my plants to know the weather.” Suspending the underlying anthropomorphic subtext of that statement for later analysis, that takes the “go local” thing to a whole new dimension.

“For max potency, I start Metallica 10 days before harvest and stop three days before harvest. It stresses out the plants and increases potency.”

“All I know is my neighbors up in Lake County played some crappy country music, and their plants died.” Uh, Willie, you need to make a few calls.

“I play Slayer—not for the plants, but to keep away the mountain lions.”

Lastly, I approached my friend Patrick on this topic.

“Dude, this is my PhD thesis,” he said. “If you have smoked Cali weed, you have undoubtedly felt the irie reggae vibrations. Any strain that is dubwise will want to be cultivated in organic and vegan fashion, will require remote care, as it will undoubtedly attend both Sierra Nevada World Music Festival and Reggae on the River, and at the mention of any political discourse, will proclaim ‘Babylon fall!'”

Well, at least we know that cultivators, when not cultivating, have short attention spans and digress easily.

Michael Hayes works for the CBD Guild. Contact him at mh*******@*****st.net

Balanced

0

Songwriters Velvy Appleton and Anita Sandwina share a special musical chemistry. The driving forces behind North Bay folk-rock outfit Spark & Whisper are like two sides of a coin, and they display that connection when they return from a recent hiatus to unveil their new album, Monument, with a pair of record-release shows this month.

Even though the two aren’t exactly sure when they met, they remember where: a communal jam at the Strawberry Music Festival in Yosemite. Going to the festival “was such a revelation about how you could interact with music and musicians,” Appleton says. After their initial meeting, the two started collaborating seriously in 2008 and formed Spark & Whisper in 2010.

Like the name implies, Spark & Whisper’s music is filled with electric energy and hushed acoustics. After two celebrated folk-centric albums, the duo expands on their dynamic sound with Monument.

On the record, Spark & Whisper are backed by upright bassist Paul Eastburn, drummer Scott Johnson, pedal steel guitarist Robert Powell, keyboardist Michael Wray and cellist Joshua McClain. Appleton and Sandwina both helped in arranging each other’s music. “We are accompanists as well as songwriters,” Appleton says.

With all hands on deck, the music achieves a lively back-and-forth in style and tone, and the album builds on the group’s folk foundations with a high-tempered rhythm that kicks in right away on Monument‘s title track, the album’s opening song.

Several songs, like “Far from This World,” begin as intricately plucked acoustic melodies and evolve into authentic alternative rock numbers. Then there are songs like “Little Bit More,” a straight-up funk jam with an irresistible groove that’s spiked by a guitar solo, one of many that Appleton provides throughout the album.

Lyrically, Monument is also a back-and-forth affair, with Sandwina and Appleton splitting the songwriting credits. The songs are largely personal and confessional, and speak to the musicians’ hopes, fears and memories. “Monument,” for instance, refers not to a national landmark, but rather to Sandwina’s grandfather’s house. Some of the songs have changed in resonance with the changing times, as both songwriters enter middle age in an uncertain political climate.

“We’re not trying to take over the world, but it’s important for us to say these things we want to say, and to be able to make something we’re proud of,” Appleton says.

Letters to the Editor: February 8, 2016

Off with His Head

In your article “Resist, Refuse, Sue” (Feb. 1), Drew Caputo, executive director of Earthjustice, was quoted as crediting Henry VIII with “Won’t someone relieve me of this troublesome priest.” It was, in fact, the Plantagenet king, in Henry II by Shakespeare, who implies an order—”Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest?”—to his knights in reference to Archbishop Thomas Becket’s challenge to the king’s authority over the Church. Henry VIII, a Tudor king, had his own troubles with Sir Thomas Moore, a Catholic, but not a member of the clergy. Henry VIII, unlike Henry II, had no problem with subtlety in making his wishes known, and ordered the execution of Moore in 1535 for treason because Moore refused to acknowledge Henry as the Supreme Head of the Church of England.

Rohnert Park

Vows

Congratulations to Charlie Swanson and his bride for resisting the temptation to spend, spend, spend on their wedding (“Slow Wedding,” Feb.1). In 1971, we got married in Michigan in the meadow beside the place where we were living. Invitations were mimeographed (the modern version would be photocopied). My wife sewed her own dress. The potluck reception was on the front lawn, with tables and chairs supplied by the Quaker meeting we were attending.

We selected one of the four cakes brought by guests as the wedding cake, but the kids ate it before we got back from the ceremony, so we picked another one. A friend was the official photographer, and the band was the sound of guests from across the country meeting each other, talking, playing Frisbee and enjoying the day. Total cost in 1971 for renting the lawnmower and meadow, buying Arlene’s dress material and sending out the invitations: $25. Forty-five years later, we figure it must have worked. The commitment and the people there are what matter; the rest is just decoration.

Via Bohemian.com

Miserable Failure

Speaking as a Republican, Donald Trump is one of the worst presidents we’ve ever had. He is not a true fiscal conservative. He intends to build a wall along the 2,000-mile, Mexican-U.S. border, costing billions. He has many conflicts of interest that he doesn’t care to address—foreign dignitaries staying at his Trump hotel, imbibing Trump wine and dining on Trump steaks! He has weakened the NATO alliance by calling it “obsolete” and is friendly with Vladimir Putin, who may or may not have blackmail material on our esteemed president.

Trump fails miserably as a role model for young American boys and men. He is not a family-values kind of guy, already on his third wife! It is obvious that he groped a number of women over the years without their consent.

Trump made a mockery of religious faith at the National Prayer Breakfast by suggesting that people pray for Arnold Schwarzenegger. He lied about the size of the crowds that attended his inauguration, lied about having a plan to replace Obamacare and reportedly created a blacklist to punish Republicans who did not support him in his race for the White House.

Overall, this president is a miserable failure in just two weeks in office. From a Republican or Democratic viewpoint, the destructiveness emanating from the White House’s current occupant is a fact.

Kentfield

Write to us at le*****@******an.com.

Artful Resistance

If there’s one upside to Donald Trump, it’s that he has spurred local artists to pick up their paintbrushes and pencils.

“I just thought, ‘We need to respond to this,'” says artist Suzanne Edminster. “We need to respond to this as artists, because that is what there is for us to do. I really felt a calling.”

Edminster is an abstract acrylic painter and monotype printmaker whose Saltworkstudio is located in Backstreet Gallery in the SOFA arts district of Santa Rosa. She says Trump’s campaign of lies and capture of the White House has become a cultural climate change as deadly as rising sea levels.

Edminster and dozens of other artists in the North Bay rallied to produce new works of accessible, progressive and politically minded art. Edminster called upon more than 30 local artists to create new works on display at Backstreet Gallery’s “The Art of Resistance,” showing on Saturdays and by appointment through March 3.

“I thought we need some honest reactions,” she says. When she put the call out for political art, she wasn’t sure what would come in and she says the majority of pieces are not your typical political art.

“Artists are making beautiful and useful metaphors, not just reacting to negative public events.”

That doesn’t mean the works in the exhibit are all flower-power images of peace and love. Some take a dark look into the hearts of those who refuse to help refugees, though many of the pieces try to find the light in the moment of darkness.

Edminster’s contribution to the show is Cash Cow, which tells the story of America’s corporate takeover through arresting visuals. A map of America is overlaid with splatters of color, and a striking image of a cow being led by a chain around its neck to depict the ways that America is being milked for all she’s worth.

Though Edminster and other artists involved in the show say emotions are raw and hope fleeting, “we’re all going to keep on creating art, any way we can. I feel that art is a battery that recharges people to do whatever it is they’re going to do,” she says. “It’s maybe an idealistic viewpoint, but, hey, we’re artists.”

THE TIME IS NOW

“This S___ Is Broken” is painted in thick black letters above a row of cuckoo clocks in Kristen Throop’s studio at Backstreet Gallery. Throop’s work is also featured in “The Art of Resistance.” Her latest works began as ruminations on time and over the past few months evolved to represent a very particular moment: now.

Throop works in series, taking a concept or idea that she says usually manifests in a dream or in her subconscious, and creates paintings and other works based on that idea over the course of a year or more. Her past series have included color-changing LED sculptures and ruminations on her own mortality.

Throop became fascinated with broken cuckoo clocks and made a connection between their classic aesthetic and fragile gears and mechanisms.

She began researching and sketching clocks and soon was buying old pieces off the internet with the intention of fixing them up. By the time the election came about last year, the broken timepieces took on a new dimension.

[page]

Displayed on Throop’s studio wall is a collection of these clocks, some beautifully designed but missing vital pieces, some only partially built, with exposed gears and springs. Rather than fix them, Throop started tagging each broken piece with the name of a branch of government or political institution.

“It just all came together for me in November,” says Throop. “It was always on some level political, but it became a lot clearer for me.”

Since the inauguration, Throop says “kookiness” has taken on a new aspect in her work. “I feel like we’re all inside something that’s so crazy,” she says.

Throop calls her new series a readymade installation, taking inspiration from the post-WWI art of the Dada movement. Rooted in avant-garde art circles in Europe and New York City in the early 20th century, Dadaists channeled the horror and meaninglessness and subversion they experienced into art often made with ordinary objects. One of the most famous examples of readymade art is Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain, a porcelain urinal.

Throop’s message is also a timely reminder to act in the moment, and she sees the clocks juxtaposing what the ancient Greeks called chronos, the personification of chronological time, with kairos, the moment of time itself—or as Throop puts it, the moment for action.

For Throop and other North Bay artists in the show, the driving imperative is a sense of solidarity within the community and the chance to start meaningful conversations. “I think it’s important to have someplace to put your energy, but we have to have art that people can connect to, that’s accessible,” she says. “That’s an important aspect of art, to be able to create meaning and allow people to synthesize that in some way. I think people are really hungry for this.”

DOOMED TO REPEAT HISTORY

“Like everyone else, I’m totally horrified by Trump, by the whole tenor of the thing,” says Dennis Calabi.

The conservator and director of the Calabi Gallery in Santa Rosa is especially chilled because he is a child of Holocaust refugees. “It feels so much like the horror stories I grew up with,” he says, “what it was like for my mother in Vienna and my father in Bologna, Italy.”

Calabi’s focus is on restoration and preservation. His gallery exhibits late-19th century and 20th century works, as well as current and local art. On Saturday, Feb. 18, Calabi Gallery opens a show titled “We Shall Overcome,” that looks at the art of defiance in the face of government corruption and corporate greed from the 1850s to today.

[page]

“I wanted to have a lot of historical material that shows a continuum,” says Calabi. “The history of this art is the history of the world, which has always been the people versus the power elite.”

Many of the historical pieces are from Calabi’s gallery collection, such as an 1875 political cartoon from artist Thomas Nast titled “The American River Ganges.” The print shows religious figures, in garb resembling crocodiles, rising from the waters of a swampy Capitol Hill to devour children while “U.S. Public Schools” sits precariously on a crumbling cliff. Fast forward 140 years, and you could easily replace those figures with appalling secretary of education Betsy DeVos and the cartoon would carry the same significance.

Several pieces in the show are social commentaries from artists representing the bleak political periods they lived in, including the current one.

“I think this is certainly the biggest crisis in my lifetime,” Calabi says. “We’ve had dark times with the Cuban Missile Crisis and Vietnam and Bush’s wars, and that’s part of the idea of the continuum. We’ve all seen this before, but Trump brings it to a new level.”

“We Shall Overcome” also carries the message that those who don’t learn from history are indeed doomed to repeat it. One of the show’s darkest pieces is a 1948 expressionist painting by Jean Halpert-Ryden titled Strange Fruit, based on the poem by Abel Meeropol and the Billie Holiday song, that depicts a lynching.

“It seemed like a historical remnant until Trump got in, and now it’s a very visceral reminder that the battle has not been won,” Calabi says.

“The advances we’ve had are not that racists were convinced not to be racist, but that society at large was frowning on speaking racism in public,” he continues. “But now they feel emboldened, knowing that Trump is one of them, and they’re coming out of the woodwork. We’ve already lost a lot of ground.”

In the face of these backslides, Calabi suspects that many hardcore conservatives, those who actually hold conservative values, are just as horrified by Trump’s rampant cabinet cronyism and international antagonization as liberals are.

“We need to show a mass movement. If these politicians realize they’ll never be elected again if they continue to stand behind Trump, hopefully they’ll move to impeach,” he says.

In addition to the historical works, “We Shall Overcome” represents a new crop of work from Bay Area artists including Sonoma County sculptor and painter Catherine Daley, Sebastopol artist Molly Eckler (who is also showing at Backstreet Gallery) and San Francisco printmaker Art Hazelwood.

While we’re still in the early days of the Trump administration Calabi predicts more artists will join the movement.

“These times drive this kind of art,” he says. “When things are really bad, the art of the time shows empathy and solidarity for those who are suffering, and of course artists are typically among them because they’ve traditionally been in the under- trodden class.”

Bearing Witness

0

I stood in the refuge home of the Friedmans, who had escaped from Germany with their two young sons. My father, a teacher at the local high school, met Henry and Herbie. We were invited for lunch. It was 1941. I was nine years old.

I stood in the hallway at my high school when our principal announced the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I can still feel the frightened shock of the event. It was 1945. I was 13 years old.

I stood among the incoming freshman class of my music college, where mostly female students highlighted the obvious absence of young men, who had gone off to war in Korea. It was 1950. I was 18 years old.

I stood in my first voter line in New York City to cast my ballot for John F. Kennedy. It was 1960. I was 28 years old.

I stood ironing in my kitchen and heard the news: “President John F. Kennedy has been shot in a Dallas, Texas, motorcade. He has died.” It was 1963. I was 31 years old.

I stood for Martin Luther King’s funeral prayer service. It was 1964. I was 32 years old.

I stood in anti-nuclear protests. It was 1980. I was 48 years old.

I stood at the liturgy for the murdered Maryknoll nuns in El Salvador. It was 1982. I was 50 years old.

After many more reasons to march, it is now 2017. I am 84 years old. My footprints are in step with millions who are just learning how to stand. Our steps will stretch across a well-worn path of what it means to witness our common history with silence, singing, dancing and speaking to be heard.

I will continue to stand for as long as it takes.

Nina Tepedino is an author who lives in Sebastopol.

Open Mic is a weekly feature in the ‘Bohemian.’ We welcome your contribution. To have your topical essay of 350 words considered for publication, write op*****@******an.com.

Blum and Doom

0

The U.S. Department of Education’s decision in August to ban a troubled for-profit college corporation from taking federal student aid funds made national headlines.

But what went largely unnoticed was the damage the move did to the family fortune of a powerful senator, as well as California’s pension system.

The federal action was a fatal blow to ITT Educational Services; left investment banker Richard Blum, husband of Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein, reeling; hurt the Golden State public pension system; and stuck U.S. taxpayers with a half-billion-dollar bill. The dominoes began to fall when the department determined the Indiana-based chain had not met accreditation standards, prompting ITT to shut down 129 campuses in 38 states and file for bankruptcy.

Thousands of students were cast adrift without the degrees for which they had paid tens of thousands of dollars.

Taxpayers are reportedly on the hook for $500 million to cover the government-backed loans that ITT banked before it became insolvent in the wake of the ban. ITT stock is trading at 4 cents, and the company reports that it is unable to make Securities and Exchange Commission filings due to “lack of resources and personnel.”

The demise of ITT followed years of governmental and media investigations that began after the FBI raided its corporate offices in 2004. Several state attorneys general have sanctioned ITT for financial and educational improprieties. The ban on federal funding came out of a 2012 U.S. Senate investigation. The SEC filed a complaint in the Southern District Court of Indiana last year, charging ITT and its chief executive officer with fraud. The company claims that it has done nothing wrong and is being persecuted for political reasons.

Despite the scrutiny, ITT thrived for years, and reaped big profits for Blum Capital Partners, a private investment bank owned and operated by Blum. The firm bought low on large amounts of ITT stock following the FBI raid. When federal regulators allowed ITT to continue accessing federal student aid money, despite its well-documented troubles, the share price boomed, reaching $122 in 2009.

Blum Capital has been ITT’s dominant shareholder for more than 10 years, owning 15 percent of its stock in 2012. Blum Capital was generally bullish on for-profit educational colleges, which composed more than a third of the value of Blum Capital’s 2010 holdings in public companies.

With a fortune estimated at $94 million, Feinstein is the ninth richest member of Congress. Under California law, Feinstein, 83, is entitled to 50 percent of her husband’s assets, including his stake in Blum Capital Partners and its investments. Her 2012 financial disclosure report takes 137 pages to list her family’s assets; by contrast, Sen. Jay Rockefeller’s disclosure runs eight pages.

Blum has a history of investing heavily in companies funded by the federal government. He has operated firms that constructed multibillion dollar public works projects in the United States; sold U.S. Post Offices to his business partners at low prices; built military bases in Iraq and Afghanistan and around the world; and sold prosthetic limbs to wounded veterans. Feinstein has a history of not recusing herself from congressional actions that affect her husband’s businesses.

In 2007, Feinstein co-authored student loan legislation that benefited the for-profit education industry at a time when Blum Capital Partners was buying stock in ITT Educational Services. Feinstein’s bill enabled ITT to triple its federal student aid revenue; ITT specifically applauded the profitable impact of Feinstein’s legislation in its annual report.

The department’s ban against ITT was taken “to protect students and taxpayers” who paid $1.1 billion to ITT in 2010. Following the 2012 Senate investigation, the Department of Education determined that ITT was failing to teach the trade skills necessary to be hired for jobs that recruiters promised. Pressured by its private equity investors, ITT managers were more concerned with generating profits than in educating its student body of mostly lower income workers and veterans, investigators found.

Investor profit came at the price of student pain. The Senate investigation reported that ITT used a recruiting technique known as the “pain funnel.”

“Recruiters are instructed to ‘poke the pain and remind [prospective students] what things will be like if they do not [enroll],'” the report stated.

Military veterans testified that ITT recruiters had told them that “the military was going to pay for everything,” which was not true; many veterans also had to take out private loans, which are still owed even though ITT is out of business.

In 2010, more than 40 percent of the value of the publically disclosed assets of Blum Capital Partners was invested in two for-profit college corporations, ITT and Career Education Corporation, also a target of the Senate investigation. Blum Capital Partners liquidated its for-profit college holdings during the past year. The publically disclosed value of the firm’s portfolio, worth more than $3 billion a decade ago, has sunk by 98 percent to
$52 million, according to SEC filings in late October 2016.

Neither Blum nor Blum Capital Partners responded to multiple telephone calls and emails requesting comment for this story.

Taxpayers and students are not the only losers in the ITT debacle. During the past decade, CalPERS, the California public employees’ pension fund, paid Blum Capital Partners several million dollars a year in investment-management fees, and directly invested hundreds of millions of dollars in the firm. Through Blum Capital Partners, CalPERS maintained investments in ITT Educational Services and the Career Education Corporation which have largely tanked in value.

Last year, CalPERS reported a $9 million investment in ITT—now worthless. Such a loss may be chump change for the multibillion dollar CalPERS, but it would buy a lot of senior meals and eyeglasses.

What a Kook

‘Kooky” is a word often ascribed to people who are offbeat and unusual to an uncomfortable degree—people like playwright Clare Barron, whose effectively oddball drama You Got Older just opened at Left Edge Theatre.

Also new is 6th Street Playhouse’s Buyer & Cellar, a one-actor exploration of the eccentricities of Barbra Streisand, another routine recipient of the “kookiness” label. Written by Jonathan Tolins and directed with energetic simplicity by Sarah Muirhead, Buyer & Cellar takes a well-documented fact about Streisand—that she built a miniature shopping mall in her cellar to hold the costumes and kitsch acquired over the years—and launches a flight of fancy about an unemployed actor named Alex (Patrick Varner), who is hired as a make-believe storekeeper in Babs’ bizarre basement playground.

The joke-packed script contains one truly effective twist, but its insights into Streisand’s psyche mostly tend toward the obvious (her mother never told her she was pretty). And the story, while funny and affectionate, strains for purpose and relevance. The real reason to see Buyer & Cellar is Varner’s outstanding performance. It is Varner’s inventive characterizations and clear emotional arc that carry this kooky comedy along, with only occasional lapses of momentum.

Rating (out of 5):

In the brilliantly crafted You Got Older, skillfully directed by Argo Thompson, 20-something lawyer Mae (an excellent Paige Picard) has lost her job, her apartment, her boyfriend and her self-confidence, at the same moment that her father (Joe Winkler, absolutely marvelous) is diagnosed with a mysterious, possibly fatal throat cancer.

She’s also got a terrible-sounding rash.

Barron’s kookiness manifests itself mainly through the candid dialogue between Mae and Mac (Jared Wright), a rash-loving stranger she meets in a bar, and her loving but distracted siblings (Sandra Ish, Devin McConnell, Victoria Saitz). Then there’s the sexy, dangerous cowboy (Chris Ginesi), who Mae conjures up in a series of increasingly disturbing sex fantasies. Weirdness aside, there is a palpable honesty and realness to the story that sneaks up on you.

Sonoma Sheriff’s Office responds to set of questions about Sheriff Freitas meeting with Jeff Sessions

Below, Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office public-information officer Sgt. Spencer Crum addresses a set of questions posed this morning to SCSO about Sheriff Steve Freitas' meeting with AG-designate Jeff Sessions. BOHEMIAN: The Examiner story noted that the sheriffs who met with Sessions support him as the AG-designate and "back Sessions' stance on immigration." I did not see Mr. Freitas directly quoted...

Sonoma sheriff meets with Sessions in DC, questions ensue

The conservative Washington Examiner reported this week that Sonoma County Sheriff Steve Freitas was among six California sheriffs who met with Attorney General-designate Jeff Sessions, with a headline that noted the sheriffs "back Sessions stance on immigration." In fairness to Freitas, the story does not quote him saying that he backs...

Walt Ranch Wrangle

Opponents of a massive vineyard proposed in the hills northeast of Napa have filed suit to block the project. At risk, say opponents, are some 300 acres of pristine forest, riparian and grassland habitat spread across the 2,300-acre ranch. Walt Ranch owners Craig and Kathryn Hall own Hall Winery, and are a known quanitity in philanthropic circles. Kathryn Hall was...

Sonic Fertilizer

Long before I came into "the industry," an old friend participated in various international cannabis competitions and walked away with some awards. His explanation for his success was simple: play jazz for the plants. John Coltrane, to be precise. But only between 3 and 6am. Huh? Only early in the morning? What about Miles Davis? McCoy Tyner? Is Chuck...

Balanced

Songwriters Velvy Appleton and Anita Sandwina share a special musical chemistry. The driving forces behind North Bay folk-rock outfit Spark & Whisper are like two sides of a coin, and they display that connection when they return from a recent hiatus to unveil their new album, Monument, with a pair of record-release shows this month. Even though the two aren't...

Letters to the Editor: February 8, 2016

Off with His Head In your article "Resist, Refuse, Sue" (Feb. 1), Drew Caputo, executive director of Earthjustice, was quoted as crediting Henry VIII with "Won't someone relieve me of this troublesome priest." It was, in fact, the Plantagenet king, in Henry II by Shakespeare, who implies an order—"Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest?"—to his knights in...

Artful Resistance

If there's one upside to Donald Trump, it's that he has spurred local artists to pick up their paintbrushes and pencils. "I just thought, 'We need to respond to this,'" says artist Suzanne Edminster. "We need to respond to this as artists, because that is what there is for us to do. I really felt a calling." Edminster is an abstract...

Bearing Witness

I stood in the refuge home of the Friedmans, who had escaped from Germany with their two young sons. My father, a teacher at the local high school, met Henry and Herbie. We were invited for lunch. It was 1941. I was nine years old. I stood in the hallway at my high school when our principal announced the atomic...

Blum and Doom

The U.S. Department of Education's decision in August to ban a troubled for-profit college corporation from taking federal student aid funds made national headlines. But what went largely unnoticed was the damage the move did to the family fortune of a powerful senator, as well as California's pension system. The federal action was a fatal blow to ITT Educational Services; left...

What a Kook

'Kooky" is a word often ascribed to people who are offbeat and unusual to an uncomfortable degree—people like playwright Clare Barron, whose effectively oddball drama You Got Older just opened at Left Edge Theatre. Also new is 6th Street Playhouse's Buyer & Cellar, a one-actor exploration of the eccentricities of Barbra Streisand, another routine recipient of the "kookiness" label. Written...
11,084FansLike
4,446FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow