Still Bleeding Blues

0

Bill Bowker: it’s a name that’s fun to say, and one familiar to residents across Sonoma County. His voice is just as familiar, and contributes to the longevity of his show, Blues with Bowker, celebrating 40 years on the radio March 16.

Bowker has been involved in radio longer than that, though. “As a young kid with my folks, I came out to Southern California, and in 1961 is when I went to radio school,” he says. “I heard Howlin’ Wolf do a song called ‘Evil,’ and it was pretty scary to me as a kid, but what was crazy was that a song could affect me so much.”

It was after hearing this rough, gravelly blues song that Bowker really began delving into the world of blues and radio. After getting his license from broadcasting school, he went to work for a country station in 1969. “That weekend was Woodstock, that weekend when I first got hired,” Bowker laughs.

During this same time, FM radio was developing as a creative space. “What we called ‘freeform radio’ was emerging. It allowed us to play whatever we wanted, because it was so new and unexplored,” he says.

In 1979, the station he worked for expanded to KVRE in Sonoma County, and Bowker traded Los Angeles for Northern California. “When we came up here it was like freedom again, it was a place where we could make something happen. It gave us a chance to do something here,” Bowker says.

What he did was take part in a radio show that has kept from succumbing to the world of mainstream music. Bowker eventually moved from KVRE to the Krush, 95.9-FM, where Blues with Bowker broadcasts weekdays from 3pm to 7pm and Sundays from 7pm to 9pm.

“Blues music is initially how I realized my affection for music,” Bowker says. “The music is so free—I like that freedom.” Though he has a fondness for the blues, what he really has an affection for is the song. “It’s about quality, not genre,” he says.

This is evident on his weekday show, which plays music stretching from rock to Americana, and often features local artists. “I just think, this is something I like, and I hope I can expose it and I hope it works,” he says.

Forty years later, it’s safe to say it does.

Surfin’ Curds

0

By late January, it was clear that I was not on track to meet my New Year’s dietary goals, so I cast about for any possible culprit besides my own self-discipline.

My eyes landed on the plate of cheese I’d enjoyed almost nightly with crackers, maybe a little secchi salami, and maybe a little wine. No, not the cheese! Suppose it was the crackers?

“A small amount of fat is better than a slice of bread,” Maureen Cunnie tells me. Cautioning that she is not a nutritionist, but operations manager at Cowgirl Creamery, Cunnie affirms that I’m behind the times if I feel guilty about indulging in their double-cream cheese products because of the bad rap on fat.

“Well, that trend is actually changing very rapidly. There’s high demand for high-protein, high-fat foods, and away from overly processed foods.” Matter of fact, says Cunnie, a nationwide cream and butter shortage is looming as a result.

Cheese is definitely part of an everyday diet, says Cunnie. “Cheese is very nutritious, it has fat and protein. If you’re athletic or into working out or doing cross training, you need both that fat and protein to retain muscle.”

I’m getting an idea, since the endless steak-scarfing of low-carbohydrate diet schemes like Atkins, or various “paleo” concepts, just feels a bit tedious. Why not, instead of gnawing on ribs in some spurious version of the Upper Paleolithic, move the clock forward a few thousand years to the pastoral era?

Pastoralism is more than a pretty picture. For thousands of years pastoral societies in Africa, Asia and Europe have herded goats, sheep, yaks—you name it, it’s got milk, they herd it—and made various fermented products. Borrowing a page from controversial “keto” diets, where the idea is to focus the body’s attention on fat, I’ll go further and bastardize food philosopher Michael Pollan’s “eat food” precept: Eat cheese. Lots of it. Go nuts.

A rigorous survey of online resources—or the first page of Google results, where any modern chump gets his healthcare information—turned up just one mention of pastoralism writ as fad diet, and trademarked, no less: “The Pastoral Life—Home of The Pastoral Diet™ & Movement Plan.” (Consult the digital influencer of your choice, or better yet, a doctor, before beginning any new diet.)

Unfortunately, the author let the site’s hosting expire shortly thereafter, but from what I remember it goes like this: I can eat plenty of cheese if I mimic the active lifestyle of a wiry herdsman leading his flock around the mountains. And oh yeah, a little goatskin flask of wine is absolutely OK.

That’s it. I’m sold.

Soon, I’m pushing my herd uphill to greener pastures on Point Reyes-Petaluma Road. Though it’d be a kick to run a bunch of bleating sheep down D Street, my herd is actually two wheels on a steel-frame road bike. But I’m climbing hills in cow country, all right, and the cars that pass me do exhibit curious herding behavior, following each other almost nose to tail on this well-worn trail.

My first stop is Marin French Cheese, founded in 1865 when, apropos, a sudden demand for a high-protein egg alternative was filled with the Petite Breakfast Cheese. The hot tip here is to get the discounted off-weighted samples. I catch a round of Schloss that’s still sliceable and move on.

I learn from my friendly cheesemonger at Cowgirl Creamery that their aromatic Red Hawk is only made in Point Reyes Station because it wouldn’t ripen the same in another environment. I opt for Wagon Wheel, which is like a fontina but more rich and buttery.

A detour to Nicasio Valley Cheese nets a rare hunk of aged San Geronimo—fine-textured, less buttery but almost smoky, with a meaty umami quality. Cheesemaking at this creamery, which has Swiss-Italian heritage, can be viewed through a window while one nibbles on samples.

Back in town, I find something besides cheddar and ice cream at Petaluma Creamery—a dry Jack goat cheese that’s flaky and tangy.

Midway up a treacherous path in the hills of West County—Occidental Road—the tiny shop at Bohemian Creamery is packed with artisan treats like Bo Peep. Now this looks like something an old shepherd pulled out of his rucksack, but it’s creamy under the rustic-looking rind, like Toma. In town, Sebastopol’s Wm. Cofield Cheesemakers specializes in English-style cheddar and a Stilton-style cheese called Bodega Blue that’s got a hint of cheddar, in contrast to Point Reyes Bay Blue.

Finally, a long lonely trek down Llano Road is rewarded with wholesale-priced St. George at Joe Matos Cheese Factory. The farmstead and its population of phlegmatic farm cats is charmingly unimproved, but the dependable St. George cheese has lately been joined by two extra-aged versions.

OK, by month’s end I’ve gained five pounds. But I don’t blame the cheese, the beautiful cheese, and let us not speak of the wine. I blame the weather—seems the shepherd took shelter for much of this rainy February.

See if you can do better at next weekend’s Artisan Cheese Festival, where the curds are mounded high at Sunday’s walk-around tasting. Go ahead, climb every mountain. Need more exercise, do another lap.

California Artisan Cheese Festival, March 23–24. Tickets, $25–$150. Sonoma County Fairgrounds, 1350 Bennett Valley Road, Santa Rosa. 707.545.4200. artisancheesefestival.com.

Core Values

In recent articles, the Bohemian did not include important facts when reporting about AshBritt Environmental’s involvement in last year’s wildfire debris cleanup in Sonoma and Napa counties (“Dirty Business,” March 6; “Cleanup Crew,” Feb. 13). Thank you for the opportunity to set the record straight.

AshBritt started as a small, family operated landscaping firm that assisted as a subcontractor in debris recovery efforts in 1992 after Hurricane Andrew. Since then, we have successfully served more than 500 clients and been directly involved in the recovery efforts of more than 60 federally declared disasters in 19 states as a prime contractor. Our work has led to collaboration with many federal and state agencies, including FEMA, CalOES, CalEPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The greatest assurance we can provide is that during our 25 years in the emergency-response industry, we have never failed to complete a project.

Recently, the Bohemian reported that AshBritt and Tetra Tech were listed as defendants in a lawsuit over excavation of properties that were subject to cleanup under the USACE contracts after the 2017 wildfires in Sonoma County. What the paper failed to tell readers is that the same law firm had launched a parallel lawsuit against AshBritt and Tetra Tech, as well as ECC Contractors, for their role in cleanup work in Napa County, and those claims have already been dismissed, specifically against AshBritt.

In the lawsuit reported on last week, AshBritt’s role is limited to work performed on a single property, for which we strenuously deny the claim. In fact, ECC Contractors performed work on the majority of properties in that suit. ECC is currently one of the prime contractors for CalRecycle’s Camp fire and Woolsey fire in Paradise and Ventura, respectively.

AshBritt maintains the highest levels of safety, quality and integrity in conducting all of our services and operations. In this instance, our work was closely supervised by the USACE and was in strict compliance with its specifications. Furthermore, our excavation is consistent with the work of other prime contractors, and with previous state-managed and supervised CalRecycle debris-removal projects.

Another misleading item in the Bohemian‘s reporting is the implication about the company’s relationship with state lobbyist Darius Anderson. The emergency-response work mentioned in the article is a federal project for which he had no involvement or role. Other state contracts mentioned are competitively awarded or were not won by AshBritt. Simply put, he has had no role procuring or representing AshBritt in any of the work cited in several of the Bohemian‘s stories.

AshBritt is proud to have been a USACE contractor, and we stand by our work on the project and that of our over 30 local and California contractors that performed debris-removal on properties.

Now as the nation’s leading disaster-recovery firm, our core values about paying it forward are ever present—whether that is hiring local, small business contractors, as we did in Sonoma and Napa counties, or finding community-identified recovery projects like the Hopper Wall reconstruction project. We are there when communities need us.

Gerardo Castillo is chief of staff for AshBritt Environmental.

Open Mic is a weekly feature in the ‘Bohemian.’ We welcome your contribution. To have your topical essay of 350 words considered for publication, write op*****@******an.com.

Wait for It

0

Was it the colonel in the library with the port pipe? Or Miss Scarlet in the kitchen with a wee dram on Christmas?

Those are the sort of tweedy, fusty images that I found gallantly contradicted in a few articles from the good writers at the Irish Times on the subject of port wine. Instead, they said, Irish bartenders these days are mixing it up in cocktails or serving it chilled and neat. But that’s all I’ve got, vis-à-vis the obligatory St. Paddy’s Day theme, so I’m moving on to one that, if very much about a binge, less so concerns drinking: the California Artisan Cheese Festival the following weekend. In the nexus of both stories, I discovered that tawny port is a cheese pairing nonpareil.

It all started when I was offered a few samples of tawny port from Portugal. Sure it’s “out of market,” but being part Irish, at least the part that counts when it comes to freely offered samples of fortified wines, I said, sure. Now I had to find the local stuff. What’s the difference between ruby and tawny?

“My understanding is that in Portugal, ports have to be aged a minimum of 10 years before the tawny designation can be used,” explains local port maker Bill Reading at Sonoma Portworks. Reading says that in some other countries and production contexts, so-called tawny port might have as little as three years aging, hastily accelerated by the use of heat. “My view is that there is only one way to achieve the rich flavors and amber color of true tawny ports—and that is through an application of patience.”

Reading just released a third batch of his Maduro Reserve tawny port ($48), aged 13 years in oak, and it earned 94 points from Sonoma County’s own Christopher Sawyer. I didn’t know he did points! It’s a lighter hue than both Dow’s 10-year ($37) and 20-year ($65) tawny port, yet still on the red side of the sunset spectrum. With notes of roasted Macadamia nuts and oiled teak, it’s similar yet earthier and less syrupy than the Portugal wines, with more acid in the center: the bright red fruit sings through a bite of Cofield Bodega Blue Stilton–style cheese, lifting the flavors of both instead of smothering one or the other, as so many touted wine pairings tend to do. Wow.

For sipping solo, try Meadowcroft’s All She Wrote port-style dessert wine ($36), a style in between ruby and tawny, only available at the tasting room in Cornerstone Gardens. It’s more tannic than the others, yet beguiling in its silky, Zinfandel fruited intensity. That’ll put some tweed on your vest.

New IOLERO director’s husband is a former Sonoma County prosecutor under Jill Ravitch

Sonoma County announced this week that it’s poised to hire Karlene Navarro, a Petaluma defense attorney, to take over as director of the county police-accountability office, the Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach. San Francisco attorney Jerry Threet left the post at the end of February.

Navarro is scheduled to appear before the Sonoma County Supervisors on their March 12 meeting for their approval.

It remains to be seen whether they’ll ask her about her husband, a former prosecutor in Sonoma County District Attorney Jill Ravitch’s office at the time Ravitch exonerated the SCSO officer whose actions helped give rise to the IOLERO.

Sonoma County Supervisor and board chairman David Rabbitt said of the Navarro hire in the Press Democrat today: “We are confident that Ms. Navarro has the qualifications, background and integrity to carry out the difficult responsibilities of this position which the public rightfully deserves.” Rabbit’s district includes Petaluma. The story did not mention Navarro’s husband.

Christopher Honigsberg, was, until recently, a Sonoma County Assistant District Attorney until he was posted to a Sonoma Superior Court judgeship last February by former Gov. Jerry Brown, according to a Press Democrat report from February of 2018 that identifies Honigsberg as the husband of Karlene Navarro.

Honigsberg was hired by the Sonoma County District Attorney Jill Ravitch in 2009, and she sang his praises to the PD upon his 2018 departure: “I think it’s an outstanding appointment. It’s a loss for our office but a real win for the county at large.”

The IOLERO was created in the aftermath of the 2013 shooting of Andy Lopez by a Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office deputy. In 2014, while Honigsberg was on her staff, Ravitch elected to not bring charges against the deputy and released a lengthy report of her investigation that cleared the officer of any criminal charges.

The Bohemian has a message in with him at Sonoma Superior Court asking about his time at the D.A.’s office. Gelhaus remains on the SCSO force.

The county settled a federal civil-rights lawsuit with the Lopez family late last year for $3 million even as Rabbitt raised concerns about the budgetary impact of the IOLERO’s annual $500k budget, and about Threet’s work as the office’s first director.

Also late last year, the SCSO pushed the Sonoma County Supervisors to consider eliminating the full-time county position and replace it with a contracted auditor, claiming that the IOLERO under Threet was biased against the SCSO and that he was improperly creating police policy in his role.

The SCSO’s attempt to eliminate the IOELRO under Rob Giordano’s leadership is a matter of public record, as its written response to Threet’s annual report from last year amply demonstrates:

“The Sheriff’s Office feels a more productive model to accomplish this is to hire a truly neutral, independent, and unbiased auditor for a specific, limited period of time. If there is no expectation of employment beyond a specific period of time, there is no pressure or inherent need to justify IOLERO. This would greatly reduce the chances of either intentional or unintentional bias developing in the auditor. It would also afford the Sheriff’s Office the opportunity to get input from a variety of perspectives outside of the County. The Sheriff’s Office looks forward to continuing to work with the Board of Supervisors to fine tune the auditor model.”

Rabbitt has echoed those concerns raised in the SCSO report in public remarks, as has supervisor Shirlee Zane.

In January, newly elected Sheriff Mark Essick told the Press Democrat that he was pleased with the county’s choice to replace Threet, which then was under wraps as Navarro underwent a background check.

“I’m excited,” Essick told the local paper of record. “I think this person will bring a different perspective to IOLERO than the current director.”

Dirty Business

0

Two contracting companies that cleared fire debris in the North Bay last year have been defrauding the federal government on contracts across the country since at least 2015, a lawsuit filed last week alleges.

AshBritt Environmental, one of the two companies named in the suit, recently hired local media magnate Darius Anderson to lobby for its interests in Sacramento. Sonoma County recently hired a former employee of the other company, Tetra Tech, to oversee the county’s emergency-management response.

Disaster-recovery players such as Anderson have highlighted, in public statements, the necessity of public-private partnerships to fully recover from the 2017 wildfires. The emphasis on public-private schemes is demonstrable when it comes to Tetra Tech and AshBritt. Both firms have contracts and ongoing business in Sonoma and Marin counties. The new Sonoma emergency-services director, Christopher Godley, held similar posts in Marin County and in San Jose—and, according to his LinkedIn account, still works for Tetra Tech, at a post he’s held since 2014.

Setting that apparent revolving-door riddle aside for the moment, the class-action lawsuit, filed by San Francisco’s Arns Law Firm on behalf of North Bay residents impacted by the companies’ work after the fires, claims the firms intentionally overbilled the federal government on contracts. During the North Bay cleanup, the companies allegedly removed far more soil than necessary and told government agencies that burnt parcels were fully cleared of ash and other toxic materials when they were not.

“The fundamental goal of the enterprise was to maximize the profits of AshBritt and Tetra Tech by over-excavating on subject properties and unnecessarily removing non-debris material without testing for contamination,” the lawsuit states.

The class action lawsuit states that victims of the alleged scheme are “presumed to be in the thousands.”

Sam Singer, a spokesperson for Tetra Tech, told the San Francisco Examiner last week that the lawsuit “has no merit whatsoever.”

A recent press release from AshBritt states that the company only performed work for one of the three North Bay residents named in the lawsuit. ECC Constructors, another debris-removal company working in the area, performed the work on the properties of the other two named North Bay residents, according to the statement.

“This suit is parallel to an earlier, currently active lawsuit in federal court brought by the same law firm and making the same allegations against ECC Constructors and Tetra Tech for the cleanup work in Napa County. AshBritt has already been dismissed from that suit,” the press release states.

In another lawsuit filed in Sonoma County Superior Court last year, the Arns Law Firm alleges that AshBritt and one of its subcontractors committed a number of labor and wage violations during its time working in the North Bay.

Previous Criticisms

AshBritt and the other federal contractors were criticized by local officials and residents for their role in the cleanup last year.

The federal government’s 2017 North Bay cleanup cost an average of $280,000 per house compared with $77,000 during the state-managed 2015 Valley fire cleanup, according to an analysis by KQED. AshBritt invoiced the Army Corps for $320 million for its work in California from October 2017 through June of 2018, according to federal records.

“There’s no doubt that this company was following the money,” Sonoma County Supervisor Shirlee Zane said of the company in an interview with the Bohemian, noting that AshBritt was among other contractors who had re-traumatized fire victims with their on-the-ground activities.

As criticism of AshBritt hit a critical mass, and as the Bohemian reported last month, AshBritt invested in California politics late last year in an apparent effort to win more work following the 2018 fire season (see “Cleanup Crew,”
Feb. 12). It also hired a firm controlled by Anderson, Platinum Advisors, to lobby for its interests in Sacramento. Anderson is the managing partner of Sonoma Media Investments, which owns the Press Democrat and numerous North Bay newspapers. He’s also the founder of the Rebuild North Bay Foundation, which has placed itself squarely between the public and the private when it comes to new North Bay disaster-services partnerships.

As it turns out, AshBritt was not among the companies selected to work on the Camp fire in Butte County or the Woolsey dire in Southern California. The company responded to the denial of its proposal by filing complaints that contested both contract awards. AshBritt’s Camp fire complaint was dismissed on March 1, and the Woolsey fire complaint is still under consideration, according to a spokesperson for CalRecycle, the agency managing the debris-removal process.

Tetra Tech, a Pasadena-based consulting and engineering-services company with hundreds of offices around the United States, is a less familiar presence in the North Bay, but its environmental testing subsidiary, Tetra Tech EC, has become known in San Francisco because of allegations of fraud during the company’s work at Hunters Point Shipyard, a former Navy base slated for housing development.

[page]

Whistleblowers from the company have claimed that the company faked tests of the contaminated soil since the early aughts. Two employees of the company who worked at Hunters Point pled guilty to swapping contaminated—irradiated—dirt for clean dirt and allegedly falsifying test results in 2017.

Both men were sentenced to eight months in jail. On Jan. 14, the Department of Justice filed a complaint alleging that Tetra Tech submitted at least $58.5 million in false invoices while working at Hunters Point.

In response to a San Francisco Chronicle article about the Department of Justice claims, Singer, Tetra Tech’s spokesperson, said that the misconduct at Hunters Point was isolated to a small number of rogue employees.

“Tetra Tech EC will vigorously defend its record and is confident it will prevail following an impartial and transparent legal and scientific review of the facts,” Singer told the Chronicle.

On Jan. 11, a few days before the Department of Justice’s complaint was filed, Tetra Tech was awarded a $250 million contract for work in Butte County.

Toxic Cloud

In the North Bay, Tetra Tech was hired by the county to oversee AshBritt’s work during the environmental cleanup process after the 2017 wildfires, according to the lawsuit.

The suit alleges that the companies marked toxic sites safe prematurely and removed far more soil than was necessary—sometimes digging six-foot deep holes on burned properties—in an effort to increase their profits, the suit charges.

The California Office of Emergency Services (OES) later discovered the mistake, according to a letter the agency’s director, Mark Ghilarducci, sent to the Army Corps of Engineers in August 2018. After reviewing the work of Army contractors, the OES identified 282 over-excavated properties eligible for backfilling in 2018, according to numbers provided to the Bohemian by Shirlee Zane and confirmed by the county Office of Recovery and Resiliency.

“After extensive on-site inspections, the issues we have discovered thus far include, but are not limited to, obvious over-scraping of properties, severe damage to driveway and sidewalks, and damage to wells and septic tanks,” the OES letter states. “Additionally, more than a dozen sites that were deemed cleared by the Army Corps of Engineers have recently been discovered to contain contaminated ash and fire debris.”

In March of 2018, the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors awarded Tetra Tech a contract. Under the agreement, Christopher Godley, Tetra Tech director of emergency services, was expected to help “assess and redefine the county’s emergency management program” in his role as the county’s interim emergency service manager. Other Tetra Tech employees would help as needed, according to the contract. The contract cost the county $9,560 per week.

In December 2018, the supervisors then hired Godley as the county’s permanent emergency services manager. Godley previously worked in Marin County in a similar role, and in San Jose. Marin and Santa Clara counties have both utilized Tetra Tech services. Marin County’s Department of Public Works signed a $46,767 contract with Tetra Tech in 2016, according to county records. According to a county-by-county 2015 review of Bay Area emergency-preparedness services by the Bay Area Urban Areas Security Initiative, Marin’s emergency services offices have prepositioned emergency-services contracts in place to utilize AshBritt in the event of a local disaster in Marin.

According to his LinkedIn profile, Godley is still employed at Tetra Tech in addition to his six-figure job in Sonoma County. But according to County spokeswoman Jennifer Larocque, Godley “is no longer under contract at Tetra Tech,” and adds that when he was employed there, he didn’t work in the company’s debris-removal division. Godley is also a former U.S. Army Major with the Army Corps of Engineers, according to his LinkedIn profile. He did a previous turn as a deputy emergency manager in Sonoma from 1995-2001, when he left for Marin County and became its emergency services manager for about 10 years.

“His 25 years of residence in Sonoma County and prior emergency-management experience make him a valuable asset to our emergency management team,” says Larocque.

Tetra Tech did not respond to requests for original comment for this story. Anderson did not respond to an email sent via Platinum Associates, his lobbying firm. As the Bohemian reported last month, Anderson’s Sacramento lobbying firm, Platinum Advisors, has been representing AshBritt in Sacramento since October of 2018.

Treasure Island

In addition to working on Hunters Point, Tetra Tech EC also tested for radiation on Treasure Island, another former naval base, according to a February report by the San Francisco Chronicle.

Three Tetra Tech EC managers named in the Department of Justice’s fraud accusation about the company’s work on Hunters Point also worked on Treasure Island, according to the Chronicle. Singer told the paper that the Department of Justice’s January filing does not mention Treasure Island.

Anderson has connections to Treasure Island that date back 20 years. Anderson’s development company, Kenwood Investments, has partnered with housing-development giant Lennar Corporation and Wilson Meany Sullivan to complete the $5 billion development.

In a statement to the Chronicle, the Treasure Island Development Group, the partnership Anderson is part of, said the group “relies on the public agencies responsible for the cleanup of Treasure Island—including state and federal environmental regulators and the U.S. Navy.

“Tetra Tech’s work at Treasure Island has been thoroughly reviewed by multiple public agencies and our own experts,” the development group stated. “No corners are being cut at Treasure Island.”

Tom Gogola contributed reporting to this article.

Sonoma Swamped

0

La Vie la Rose

I spent last Wednesday, Thursday and Friday at the Hotel La Rose in Santa Rosa, since I could not get home to Guerneville through the flood waters. I had been in Pennsylvania talking to young writers at Bloomsburg University, and did not realize how isolated my home had become while I was away.

I love the La Rose, having rented a room from them once so I could finish a manuscript and needed a room where I could spread chapters all over the floor. They were happy to give me just that, and this time they welcomed me with a warm, dry room and a short walk to the nearby thrift stores where I bought a clean T-shirt for pajamas and a bathing suit just in case. Didn’t need the bathing suit but the T-shirt lasted for two nights, and I am going to keep it as a memento of the great flood of 2019.—Dorothy Allison, author of ‘Bastard Out of Carolina’

Making a Stand in Guerneville

Tom Lynch had four feet of water in his Guerneville house after the rains and flooding along the Russian River. His wife and his 15-year-old daughter got out of Guerneville and went to somewhat higher ground in Sebastopol. Tom and his mother-in-law stayed at home to brave the extreme weather in a town that was all but cut off for days because of the flooding. While the downstairs of his home was wet, upstairs was dry.

A colorful candidate for county supervisor a few years ago, Lynch has lived in Guerneville since 1980. “I’ve seen floods before,” he says, sounding not one bit intimidated by the Great Flood of 2019. Indeed, it would take a flood of Biblical proportions to dislodge tom Tom Lynch from his Guerneville niche.—Jonah Raskin

Going with the Flow in Forestville

I’m on River Drive in Forestville. We left on Tuesday evening, Feb. 26, in anticipation of the rising water. We knew we would get hit, and prepared by removing everything from the basement, which we had made into a living space for two teens. I assumed we would get four to four-and-a-half-feet of water. I was wrong. The silt line on the house is at about seven and a half feet.

Coming home to River Drive was surreal: A neighbor’s car was turned over, and was washed into the middle of the street by the current. I lost parts of all four sides of fencing, and my yard is full of oddities: a wooden duck, a garden bench that doesn’t belong to me, a brown tattered suitcase, which happens to be partially unzipped and full of clothes. And mud. Slimy stinky mud.

The mess and repair is daunting, but I have a charming river home and I love it. Living on the river is not for everyone, but there’s a state of being that happens out here when the river reminds us that we aren’t in control—a muddy acceptance of our connection to the river and a kinship with neighbors that reminds us we are in this together. River rats in California hillbilly country. I love it.—Angelina Hovan

The Literary View from Monte Rio

Poet Pat Nolan has lived in Monte Rio along the Russian River since 1973. “Right now it’s not a pretty picture here,” he says. Nolan had four feet of water in his studio, where he makes block prints. He knew the flood was coming—he listened to the National Weather Service— and so he and his wife moved everything they could to prevent severe damage. They even took up the carpet.

“Old-timers survive floods better than newcomers,” says the old-timer Nolan. “After the flood of 1995, we had our house raised above the floodplain, so we were in relatively good shape this time. Not so our neighbors. They got seven feet of water in their place.”

The Russian River is now down from what it was, but in Monte Rio, the flooding made a mess. “There’s a lot of mud and silt,” Nolan says. “It covers everything.” When the river peaked and the creek backed up, he and his wife couldn’t leave. Now, they can come and go and reflect on the Great Flood of 2019.—Jonah Raskin

Split Scene in Sebastopol

I heard the rain pouring all night and morning in my Sebastopol neighborhood. When I got up, I was surprised how little standing water there was in my backyard. Love the sandy-loam soil. Gratefully, we were high and dry. It wasn’t until I saw a Facebook post of someone paddling past the Highway 12 Chevron later that morning that I knew things were not going so well across town.

I took my kids down to the Barlow because I knew it was flood-prone. And flood it did. We watched in amazement as kayakers stroked down McKinley Street to the water’s end at Taylor Lane. A Circle of Hands, my daughter’s favorite toy store, was an island. Although it was near noon, Community Market workers appeared to be just erecting their flood barriers in face of the rising tide of flood waters.

“Put down your cell phones and help,” called out one of them to disaster gawkers like me.

It’s bizarre how there can be devastation on one block and normalcy the next block over. It’s like toggling between two worlds. The morning of the flood in Sebastopol had that feeling. People rode bicycles on closed streets, friends chatted with coffee in hand and kids out of school wandered about—while a few feet away businesses and dreams lay under three feet of brown water.—Stett ‘Sebastopol Strong’ Holbrook

Huffman’s Rolling Thunder Tour

It wasn’t raining, pouring or storming, but U.S. Congressman Jared Huffman barnstormed across swaths of Sonoma County that were hardest hit by February’s floods. According to the most recent tally, 2,600 properties were either partially or totally flooded, though no one knows for sure the full extent of the damage or the dollar amount it will take to make the necessary repairs.

At the battered Barlow in Sebastopol, Huffman stopped to chat with John Stewart, who owns and operates Zazu with his wife, Duskie Estes; they’ve made their restaurant a destination for foodies from here and around the country. Zazu is now closed with no opening date on the calendar.

“It’s sad to see the flood damage when you could be serving delicious food,” Huffman said to Stewart, who was helping to clean up the mess. Huffman added, “We’re taking stock and we’re trying to get people help. I’m so sorry.” His words sounded heartfelt.

Stewart explains that it rained so heavily and the floodwaters rose so quickly that nothing could have prevented the damage to his restaurant, not even sandbags.

The Congressman’s day began in Guerneville, where floods are a way of life. Then he was off to Forestville, where he rendezvoused with local residents and with Sonoma County Fifth District Supervisor Lynda Hopkins. Sebastopol was up next. Flood damage was extensive. The raging waters not only hit the Barlow, but also Park Village, formerly the Mobile Home Park on Highway 12, as well as the Community Center on High Street, which wasn’t high enough to escape the raging waters.

Newly appointed Sebastopol Mayor Neysa Hinton toured the Barlow with Huffman. A third-generation Sonoma County resident, she grew up and came of age with floods.

“We need FEMA funds,” Hinton said. “We’ll have to see if we qualify.” She adds that Huffman’s first-hand experience will enable him to go back to Washington, D.C., and lobby for help.

“We want President Trump to act,” Hinton said. “We hope he’ll act.”

Recognizing the urgency, on Feb. 28, Gov. Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency for all of Sonoma County after the days of heavy rain led to mudslides and flooding along the Russian River and in low-lying areas close to the Laguna de Santa Rosa, the county’s largest watershed and wetland and home to all sorts of flora and fauna.

Hinton has called for a community meeting in Sebastopol on March 13 at 4pm, with the location still to be determined. At the Community Center, the removable floor was saved, but floodwaters damaged the electrical system and the siding. The building is closed for social gatherings until further notice.

Huffman, a Democrat who represents the fourth Congressional district, knows all about the “national emergency” orchestrated by President Trump. Huffman has repeatedly called it a “sham national emergency.” He knows that there’s nothing sham about the emergency here. The congressman is no stranger to Sonoma County’s wild weather. In January 2017, he chose to avoid Trump’s inauguration in Washington, D.C. Instead, he trekked to Guerneville to support the Russian River cleanup efforts after the flooding at the start of the year. Some things don’t change.

Now, citizens hardest hit by the storms are worried about the cost of repairs and about weather reports that predict more rain in March. But in Forestville, Guerneville and Sebastopol citizens are relieved that Huffman saw the worst of the damage. Will his presence here today bring help from the federal government? There’s hope.—Jonah Raskin

Lookout from
the Laguna

In the four years that Kevin Munroe has been in Sonoma County, the executive director for the Laguna de Santa Rosa Foundation has seen the region’s 254-square-mile watershed fill, but never quite like last week’s flooding.

“My understanding is the last time the waters of the Laguna flooded to this level was, I think, 2005,” he says. “And my understanding is the rain we received in that 24-hour period between Tuesday and Wednesday [Feb. 26–27] was the most rain that had fallen in this area in a 24-hour period in a hundred years.”

In fact, according to National Weather Service data going back to 1902, it was the rainiest day in Santa Rosa’s history. Without the Laguna’s wetland complex, the water would have risen even higher.

“A large wetland like the Laguna can benefit downstream communities,” says Munroe. “The Laguna can grow to 30,000 acres of wetlands. Think of all that water being slowed down and held before it goes downstream.”

While the flooding in Sebastopol, Monte Rio, Forestville and Guerneville was severe in places, it would have been several times worse if it were not for the Laguna.

Munroe also points out the importance of the annual cycle of flooding for the wetlands. “It’s understandable to think of flooding as an emergency and a crisis, and of course for us living near the river it can be, but from an ecological standpoint, flooding is so important. It recharges the water table and creates habitat for wetland creatures.”

For their part, the foundation’s staff was out in kayaks the day after the heavy rains to monitor the situation in real time, posting photos and videos on social media for the public to see. “We tried to be a source of information and education,” says Munroe.

As the water levels go down, Munroe adds that there are three simple things that individuals can do throughout the year and during floods to help the wetlands, including picking up trash before it flows downstream, staying conscious about any chemicals or fertilizers being used on personal property and using native plants in gardening.

“Those native plants will do a better job of providing wildlife habitat and holding the soil than invasive exotic plants,” says Munroe. “The more native plants you have on your property or in your neighborhood, that’s going to help wildlife recover from a flood.”—Charlie Swanson

The Bong Show

Never have so many Sonoma County cannabis farmers felt so frustrated with the permitting process that once offered them the opportunity to move product and make money, legally.

Those same farmers are reluctant to speak out and thereby jeopardize negotiations with county officials. One former cannabis-industry lobbyist who has worked closely with the county Permit and Resource Management Department (PRMD), agreed to speak to the Nugget on condition of confidentiality. Call him “Deep Toke.”

“There’s no back-room conspiracy on the part of PRMD and [PRMD director] Tennis Wick to stymie the process, but the outcome is the same as if they had actually conspired,” says Deep Toke. “Wick doesn’t tell his underlings what to do or not do, but he creates an atmosphere in which the message is, ‘Marijuana people aren’t welcome here.'”

Deep Toke adds that Press Democrat stories about cannabis violence, along with irate citizens who don’t want weed in their neighborhoods, have made elected officials afraid to lean on PRMD to expedite the permitting process.

“The supervisors don’t want to stick their necks out and risk losing popular support,” says Deep Toke, “and people like Wick don’t want to lose jobs, pensions and status in the community.”

Alexa Rae Wall, who serves on the Sonoma County Cannabis Advisory Board, says she can’t put her finger on any single reason behind the failed permitting process.

“It’s a mix of everything,” she says, and adds that she’s flummoxed why the county has accepted millions of dollars for cannabis permits but has not issued a single one for outdoor cultivation.

Dennis Rosatti, a public affairs consultant who works with cannabis cultivators—and who served as the executive director of Sonoma County Conservation Action—says he has clients who were given a stamp of approval, only to be arbitrarily denied.

“The country has changed the rules repeatedly,” says Rosatti. “It’s not surprising that growers have moved away and that most of the cannabis for sale in dispensaries here isn’t grown here.”

Mike McGuire’s Senate Bill 67 calls for extensions on the permitting process, but even if it passes it won’t remedy the situation. Marijuana Business Daily’s John Schroyer has already reported that thousands of cannabis companies will lose income, face product shortages, and be forced to shut down.

Two years ago, local growers predicted the current fiasco. Now, many remain in the black market. Deep Toke adds, “Everyone is scrambling to get big so that when the feds legalize, they’ll be bought up, not forced out.”

Jonah Raskin is the author of ‘Marijuanaland: Dispatches from an American War.’

Bring the Heat

0

J‌ared Huffman, the member of Congress who represents most of the North Bay, says that climate change is “the greatest moral, economic and environmental imperative of our time.” That’s the kind of language we use when we feel compelled to take bold action because what we want to achieve is critically important.

What bold action, then, should we expect Rep. Huffman to take?

Huffman laudibly signed on to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s far-reaching Green New Deal resolution. But then he accepted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s appointment to the new House Select Committee on Climate Crisis—which she has rendered virtually toothless.

Pelosi, who recently referred to the Green New Deal as “the green dream, or whatever they call it,” hamstrung the committee by depriving it of the powers routinely given to congressional committees: the power to issue subpoenas and write legislation. Without subpoena power, the committee can’t force cabinet members or agency heads appointed by the Trump administration to testify on economic and environmental issues. Nor can it compel fossil-fuel industry officials to provide documents or testify at hearings.

The first obvious question is, if Pelosi believes climate change is a real threat, why would she create such a weak committee? The next question is, if we are truly facing “the greatest moral, economic and environmental imperative of our time”—and we certainly are—why hasn’t Huffman spoken up about the powerlessness of this committee?

Huffman’s appointment to the select committee would have been a perfect opportunity for him to challenge those severe restrictions that make it more of a façade than a functional legislative panel.

Under the circumstances, Huffman’s silence on this crucial matter has been deafening, and deeply disappointing. Why hasn’t he publicly and emphatically asserted that the Select Committee on Climate Crisis should have real teeth—including subpoena and bill-drafting powers—so that it can actually make a difference as we all face this greatest moral, economic and environmental imperative of our time?

Is staying in Speaker Pelosi’s good graces more “imperative” than really fighting for a Green New Deal to address the climate crisis?

Alice Chan is the 10th Assembly District Delegate to the California Democratic Party.

Letters to the Editor: March 6, 2019

Ban Fur

As we know, people all over the world, and perhaps especially in California, care about animals. In 2018, the citizens of this state overwhelmingly voted, for the second time, to protect animals raised for food. Numerous pieces of legislation have been passed at both the state and local level to protect companion animals.

And the state is now moving quickly to ban the sale of fur. In just the last couple of years, Berkeley, San Francisco and Los Angeles have passed measures banning its sale. Currently, San Diego residents are working on passing their own fur ban. I am writing to urge everyone to contact their state representatives and support AB 44, the bill to ban the sale of fur in California.

The fur industry is extremely cruel to animals. Minks, who love to roam great distances and who were designed by nature to swim, are housed in tiny, filthy cages. They are commonly driven insane by the misery and will even chew off their own limbs or kill their babies. The slaughtering process is gruesome, with animals either orally or anally electrocuted. Sometimes they are suffocated or, in China, beaten to death or even skinned alive.

There are no federal regulations to protect animals raised for fur in the United States. Please join us in the fight to legitimize and normalize compassion for all animals, including those raised for their fur, and support AB 44.

Santa Rosa

Bravo!

In reply to a letter printed here last week (“Dark Stage,” Feb. 27): As a subscriber to Main Stage West, I would say that in at least the last three years and probably longer I have seen every play that they have staged. I’ve liked some better than others, but most of them, including After Miss Julie, I’ve loved. Outstanding acting, directing and sets. It amazes me that here in our small village of Sebastopol I am privileged to see theater of a caliber that rivals what I’ve seen on and off Broadway. I applaud Main Stage West for being willing to take chances and for presenting themes that make me think about the complexities of human interaction, which are often laughable. Bravo Main Stage West!

Sebastopol

Write to us at le*****@******an.com.

Still Bleeding Blues

Bill Bowker: it's a name that's fun to say, and one familiar to residents across Sonoma County. His voice is just as familiar, and contributes to the longevity of his show, Blues with Bowker, celebrating 40 years on the radio March 16. Bowker has been involved in radio longer than that, though. "As a young kid with my folks, I...

Surfin’ Curds

By late January, it was clear that I was not on track to meet my New Year's dietary goals, so I cast about for any possible culprit besides my own self-discipline. My eyes landed on the plate of cheese I'd enjoyed almost nightly with crackers, maybe a little secchi salami, and maybe a little wine. No, not the cheese! Suppose...

Core Values

In recent articles, the Bohemian did not include important facts when reporting about AshBritt Environmental's involvement in last year's wildfire debris cleanup in Sonoma and Napa counties ("Dirty Business," March 6; "Cleanup Crew," Feb. 13). Thank you for the opportunity to set the record straight. AshBritt started as a small, family operated landscaping firm that assisted as a subcontractor in...

Wait for It

Was it the colonel in the library with the port pipe? Or Miss Scarlet in the kitchen with a wee dram on Christmas? Those are the sort of tweedy, fusty images that I found gallantly contradicted in a few articles from the good writers at the Irish Times on the subject of port wine. Instead, they said, Irish bartenders these...

New IOLERO director’s husband is a former Sonoma County prosecutor under Jill Ravitch

Sonoma County announced this week that it's poised to hire Karlene Navarro, a Petaluma defense attorney, to take over as director of the county police-accountability office, the Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach. San Francisco attorney Jerry Threet left the post at the end of February. Navarro is scheduled to appear before the Sonoma County Supervisors on...

Dirty Business

Two contracting companies that cleared fire debris in the North Bay last year have been defrauding the federal government on contracts across the country since at least 2015, a lawsuit filed last week alleges. AshBritt Environmental, one of the two companies named in the suit, recently hired local media magnate Darius Anderson to lobby for its interests in Sacramento. Sonoma...

Sonoma Swamped

La Vie la Rose I spent last Wednesday, Thursday and Friday at the Hotel La Rose in Santa Rosa, since I could not get home to Guerneville through the flood waters. I had been in Pennsylvania talking to young writers at Bloomsburg University, and did not realize how isolated my home had become while I was away. I love the La...

The Bong Show

Never have so many Sonoma County cannabis farmers felt so frustrated with the permitting process that once offered them the opportunity to move product and make money, legally. Those same farmers are reluctant to speak out and thereby jeopardize negotiations with county officials. One former cannabis-industry lobbyist who has worked closely with the county Permit and Resource Management Department (PRMD),...

Bring the Heat

J‌ared Huffman, the member of Congress who represents most of the North Bay, says that climate change is "the greatest moral, economic and environmental imperative of our time." That's the kind of language we use when we feel compelled to take bold action because what we want to achieve is critically important. What bold action, then, should we expect Rep....

Letters to the Editor: March 6, 2019

Ban Fur As we know, people all over the world, and perhaps especially in California, care about animals. In 2018, the citizens of this state overwhelmingly voted, for the second time, to protect animals raised for food. Numerous pieces of legislation have been passed at both the state and local level to protect companion animals. And the state is now moving...
11,084FansLike
4,606FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow