Prairie Oyster

0

Blue Plate Special


Senor McQuire

Pass the Hot Sauce: Prairie Oyster likes their music traditional and country-style.

Prairie Oyster serves up some tasty C&W licks

By Greg Cahill

There is a haunting moment on “She Won’t be Lonely Long,” the plaintive opening track on Prairie Oyster’s new Blue Plate Special (Vel Vel) disc, in which singer and bassist Russell deCarle evokes a high, lonesome wail that for just a second sounds for all the world like the late, great Graham Parsons–the ex-Byrd and tragic godfather of country rock–risen from the ashes of his Joshua Tree funeral pyre.

“He wasn’t that much of an influence actually,” says deCarle, during a phone interview from his 140-acre ranch outside of Toronto, Canada, “though I did listen to the Byrds a little bit. I mean, we were playing when those guys were still around. And I was influenced by many of the same traditional singers as Parsons: Merle Haggard and the like.”

OK, so deCarle isn’t channeling the dearly departed–he’s still got a serious lock on the spirit of traditional country music.

Prairie Oyster–whose new CD shifts easily from honky-tonk shuffles to Tex-Mex reveries to Orbisonesque ballads–is hardly a household name in the lower 48 states. But this hard-working Canadian sextet has garnered six coveted Juno Awards (the Canadian equivalent of the Grammies) since 1986, and is generating quite a buzz stateside. Of late, music critics are lumping in Prairie Oyster with such sizzling New Country revivalists as BR5-49–country bands marked more by their love of twangy guitars and the joy of a crying pedal steel.

These are prime cuts.

In the mid-’80s, such neo-traditional country artists as Dwight Yoakum and Steve Earle infused new blood into a pop-country genre bloated by slick crossover acts like Barbara Mandrell and Kenny Rogers. By 1992, Nashville had settled into the bland pop pretensions of Garth “I’ve got an MBA and I’m gonna use it” Brooks, Billy Ray “I really wish I was a Chippendale dancer” Cyrus, and other country posers.

“You mean, that Barry Manilow in a cowboy hat thing?” deCarle asks, sizing up the competition. “I’ve always listened to country music, though I also listened to tons of rock and pop and R&B. But there’s just something about it. I hear a Ray Price shuffle and–who knows what it is?–it tweaks a mysterious thing in your brain and turns you on.

“But it’s all soul music to me. I mean, I love the Stanley Brothers just as much as I love Aretha Franklin.”

It hasn’t been easy finding the limelight. DeCarle co-founded the original Prairie Oyster band in 1974, a short-lived regional hit. “That was more of a western swing, honky-tonk sort of a thing,” he explains. In 1982, the band reunited for a few gigs and has been at it ever since. In a surprise move, Prairie Oyster became the first band signed to ex-CBS bigwig Walter Yetnikoff’s new label, which most assumed would revolve around rock and pop acts. “We’re real excited,” says deCarle, adding that Vel Vel has marketed the band in an aggressive manner rarely seen in the country side of the business. “For whatever reason, they get what we are all about. In most cases, you record an album, and if the single doesn’t do that good–bang!–you’re stuck with an album that you feel very good about but that is just sitting there.

“We really didn’t want to end up spinning our wheels again.”

Instead, Prairie Oyster is bringing pure country to the table and sweetening fans who’d gone sour on the country music industry. “I think it’s always there,” deCarle says of the traditional influences. “People who love country music are always playing it. They may not be heard on the radio and they may be hidden out there, but they’re always out there doing it. I think that no matter what happened, we’d all be playing some form of this music in some incarnation.”

So is the world finally catching up to Prairie Oyster? “Hopefully,” he laughs. “I mean, one thing we have in common with the Dwight Yoakums or the Ricky Skaggses is that we hold that tradition in very high regard.”

Prairie Oyster opens for country singer Kathy Mattea on Friday, May 2, at 8 p.m. at the Luther Burbank Center for the Arts, 50 Mark West Springs Road, Santa Rosa. Tickets are $24.50­$32.50. Call 546-3600.

From the April 24-30, 1997 issue of the Sonoma County Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1997 Metrosa, Inc.

Welfare Reform

0

New ‘Deal’


Protest Vote: After spending 30 years in government fighting poverty in America, Peter Edelman resigned last summer in protest of President Clinton’s multibillion-dollar cut in welfare. The new law, he says, will hurt millions of poor children.

Photo by Janet Orsi



Rocking the Boat: Notes from an ex-Clinton appointee

By Peter Edelman

LAST SUMMER, President Clinton signed welfare legislation that radically altered the way we approach public assistance for families with children, and took some huge budget whacks at a number of other vitally important programs for low-income people. I was assistant secretary for planning and evaluation at the Department of Health and Human Services then, and I resigned in protest because I disagreed profoundly with that legislation.

This new law is not welfare reform. It does not promote work effectively, and it will hurt millions of poor children by the time it is fully implemented. It has transformed our six-decade commitment to low-income families into a block grant with no floor of minimum protection, and it has imposed an arbitrary lifetime time limit of five years for federally financed help regardless of continuing need.

And it doesn’t stop there.

The new law also cuts a wide swath through the federal help available to legal immigrants, makes deep cuts in the federal food-stamp program, takes a swipe at help for disabled children, and cuts a number of other nutrition and social services programs. After all the budget drama of the winter of 1995-96, with government shutdowns and Speaker Newt Gingrich complaining of being forced to exit by way of the back steps on Air Force One, the $55 billion cut (over six years) from programs for low-income people was the only multiyear budget-cutting accomplished.

The Defense Department actually received $12 billion (for one year) more than the president requested.

Six months have now passed since the signing of the bill, and state legislatures all across the country are putting the finishing touches on their plans to implement the new welfare structure (except for a few that had acted anticipatorily and have a head start). Existing legal immigrants will be cut off from Supplemental Security Income (for the elderly and disabled) and food stamps over the next few months.

Though we haven’t seen the terrible effects yet, we will start seeing these effects on legal immigrants shortly, and then, more gradually, we will see the effects on poor children and families as the time limits hit.

Obviously, the impact will be exacerbated whenever a recession comes along.

None of this stops the political spin machines from operating, though. The welfare provisions are not fully operative, but we keep hearing that they are already working beautifully. We are told we know this because the nation’s welfare rolls have declined by 2.8 million people in the last two years.

The welfare rolls are indeed down, and that is a good thing, but this in fact tells us little about what is going on and what lies ahead as the new law goes into full effect.

The rolls shot up during the recession of the early ’90s, and the declines have brought them back down, but not even to where they were when the bubble started to form. The rolls were at 10.8 million people in 1989; they went up to 14.3 million people in 1993; and now they are down to about 11.5 million. Why the drop? Common sense says it is for largely the same set of reasons as the increase. We have had sustained pretty low unemployment for quite a while, so people are finding jobs.

The welfare rolls are composed of roughly two groups–the people who cycle on and off, and the people who stay on for a long time. My strong hunch is that the people who are getting off now are those who go on and off–they are getting off faster and holding on to jobs longer.

This is all to the good, but it does not tell us much, except that prosperity is better for employment than recessions. There are still nearly 4 million adults on the welfare rolls (and more than 7 million children). Around half are long-term recipients, on the rolls for over five years. They are the ones who are the target of the new bill.

And we have not begun to make a dent in their situation.

THE ARBITRARY time limits in the new law dictate that, by five years from the date it went into effect and thereafter, only 20 percent of those getting federally financed help on any given day can be people who have received a total of five years of help during adulthood. That is going to be tough to pull off.

I believe strongly in work, and I believe strongly in a serious effort to maximize employment, but I do not think the new law constitutes such an effort. It seeks to accomplish its aims by bumper-sticker slogans and arbitrary strictures, not by a serious effort to ascertain what is really required to attain maximum success.

There are three major questions that trouble me deeply. First off, where are the jobs? Where are the entry-level, geographically accessible jobs? Virtually every metropolitan area has been losing jobs in the last few years, although very recent trends are in the other direction now that we are at the top of the business cycle. But there still is a mismatch, and what happens when we are confronted by a recession?

Virtually no one is addressing the obvious question: If there are not enough private-sector jobs, we have to be talking about either investing in public jobs or relaxing the work requirements. The five-year lifetime limit says to people that it doesn’t matter if they play by all the rules; if they use up their five years of eligibility, whether that moment is five years or 15 years from now, they are simply out.

There are millions of people who struggle and struggle, going on and off the welfare rolls as they get and lose marginal jobs. The time limit applies to them as well. It just may take a little longer for them to reach it.

Second, how many states will invest in the major effort that it takes to help long-term recipients get and keep work? People without a lot of work experience bounce from one job to another until they stabilize. In Project Match in Chicago’s Cabrini Green public housing project, 71 percent of the participants who went to work had lost their initial job by the end of the first year. With a lot of coaching on the job, and support and pushing to help people get the next job, 54 percent of the people were working all year by the fifth year. This costs money. One cannot just wave a magic wand.

Adequate child care and health coverage have to be available, too. Otherwise, people will find it difficult to stay on the job when they are unable to find affordable child care or when the year of transitional Medicaid coverage runs out. This revolving door was bad enough before, but now, with time limits, it will be disastrous. And if people are going to be able to make ends meet, it will be necessary for states to let people keep a part of their welfare payment after they go to work in a low-wage job.

The earned income tax credit, even as expanded by Congress in 1993, does not add enough to help all low-wage workers out of poverty. People–all people–should be assured of a living wage for their work. This should be true for people coming off welfare, and it should be true for people who have never been on welfare. Very few states are paying adequate attention to these issues as they implement the new law.

Third, are the states taking the individual circumstances of people into account: the women who are victims of domestic violence; those taking care of chronically ill children or other relatives; those whose mental or emotional problems or learning disabilities make it very difficult for them to function in a job?

Although this varies widely, I believe–and many professionals in the field agree–that the 20 percent exception is quite inadequate.

THE STATES are making decisions about all of this right now. Such states as Oregon, Minnesota, and Vermont are making serious efforts to do real welfare reform. Others are adopting or proposing time limits shorter than the federal five years, reductions in their state contribution of funds to the task, and patently inadequate child-care funding that sets up a destructive competition for subsidy between people already working and new entrants to the workforce.

Indications exist that workfare jobs are being used in a number of places to substitute for existing jobs.

This displacement sets up an even more destructive and unjust competition between the already working poor and those just now entering the job market.

The overall picture does not lend itself to great optimism. One can only hope that people will make some sensible adjustments before too much damage is done.

Some of those people who voted for President Clinton last fall believed he would propose significant changes in this high-risk, forced-march, one-size-fits-all framework. That was never in the cards. He and others want to see how the new welfare provisions work in practice before they propose changes. He has proposed some limited, but worthwhile, budgetary changes that would restore some of the cuts in the legal immigrant and food stamp provisions that make the bill even worse.

These have been less than enthusiastically greeted by Republicans on Capitol Hill, leaving the impression that even these modest suggestions will go nowhere unless the president presses hard for them in the budget negotiations that are beginning now. And there is no proposal on the table to make any significant change in the radical new welfare structure that is at the heart of the new law.

The action now is in the states. People across the country need to pay careful attention to what is going on in their state capitals right now.

The poor children of America would greatly appreciate it.

From the April 24-30, 1997 issue of the Sonoma County Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1997 Metrosa, Inc.

The Scoop

Hey, Sport …

By Bob Harris

MY OLD CLEVELAND buddy T. (you might know the name, and he prefers privacy) and I recently went to Anaheim to watch the Indians play the Angels. We sat up high and made our predictions. We agreed that (a) while Matt Williams is easier to like than Albert Belle, so are necrotic skin viruses, and (b) given the team’s recent roster of clanky, oft-injured has-beens like Robby Thompson, Pat Borders, and Kevin Seitzer, Jacobs Field now has more pure fracture potential than a matinee of [Crash].

We also made book on how long before “black” Jack McDowell–who hasn’t pitched decently since Gingrich was popular–is forced to get a real job. T., who is black, mused that if McDowell really was similarly shaded, he’d have been out of baseball long ago. We joked about it a bit and the conversation wandered elsewhere.

We had to talk loudly. In the highest row of the upper deck stood the Massillon High baseball team of Massillon, Ohio, screaming unison chants at full teenage volume. A dozen Ohioans actually out-lung-powered 24,000 Angelenos combined. This was cool.

Soon, beer did what beer does. The jocks got even louder, and the crowd got annoyed. Finally, as the game concluded, the Massillon guys offed their shirts and did that naked-white-guy-screaming-in-the-cold thing, all of them at once.

The effect was almost blinding. Their pasty Cleveland flesh damn near glowed. And so, at last, the California crowd mustered a hearty response–a laughing, vengeful chant of beachfront pride:

“Get-a-tan! Get-a-tan!”

The whole upper deck joined in, laughing and clapping. The jocks took it well. And T., capping the joke, stood up to take [his] shirt off–so the Massillon guys would have a tan indeed. “After all,” T. shouted, “it [is] Jackie Robinson Week.” Cleveland’s victory was now complete. We laughed all the way home.

We’ve been friends since I was 10, so it feels bizarre to me to notice T. in terms of stuff like skin tone. But he really was the only black guy in the whole upper deck that night, as far as I could see. And, checking a few stats, it turns out he was right about McDowell, too. I thought about that while watching the Shea Stadium tribute on TV.

Y’know, there aren’t a lot of folks we can truly admire without hesitation. Jackie Robinson was damned close. He’s one of the few real heroes in American history.

But now that the celebration is over, let’s be honest: How much of it really honored Jackie, and how much was just feel-good window-dressing?

I mean, there’s Bill Clinton–Sister-Souljah-baiting, Lani-Guinier-abandoning, affirmative-action-backpedaling, racist-drug-policy-advocating Bill Clinton– denouncing racism. And there’s Jackie’s old team, the Dodgers, who’ve never had a black manager, general manager, PR director, trainer, or even equipment manager, for crying out loud.

Here are over 1,600 daily newspapers–only 10 of which employ a black sports columnist.

There’s Deion Sanders and the Reds, cutting their sleeves in cosmetic “homage” (never mind that Jackie never did any such thing) while getting rich by playing for racist Marge Schott. There are the Braves–whose fans sing war chants and do the “Tomahawk Chop” (popularized by, yep, Mr. Sensitivity, Deion Sanders); here are the Indians, whose Chief Wahoo logo “honors” Native Americans the way Angels fans might “honor” Catholicism by wearing foam mitres on their heads, crossing themselves during rallies, and singing “Hail Marys” during the seventh-inning stretch; and here are fans of both teams, regarding outraged Native Americans pleading for respect a mere nuisance. And they are all denouncing racism.

Folks, we’re celebrating social changes that haven’t yet occurred. Have we not eyes? What if all those Third World kids working 60-hour weeks making sports shoes looked like murdered Jon-Benet Ramsey? We’d stop this child labor nonsense in a week, tops. Yet everyone’s applauding Tiger Woods as the emblem of our new racial enlightenment, even though he literally sells his own head as ad space, wearing the Nike “swoosh” cap to endorse Asian-children-dying-in-sweatshops footwear.

If we can’t separate image from reality in sports, what chance do we have overcoming racism in the real world? You line up all the black owners, CFOs, and general managers in baseball combined, and you still need two more guys just to sing backup to Gladys Knight. Bad enough? The real world is worse: Carol Moseley Braun is just the second black senator of this entire century.

Jackie’s fight isn’t over. It has barely begun.

From the April 24-30, 1997 issue of the Sonoma County Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1997 Metrosa, Inc.

Jug Wines

0

Big Boys


Field of Dreams: The James Arthur Field brand of signature wine is the ideal vino for group feeds.

Photo by Janet Orsi



In appreciation of cheap jug wine

By Steve Bjerklie

JUG WINES, ALAS, have a reputation only a skosh above former Clinton adviser Dick Morris’ (I mean, he is pond scum), a dismal condition I attribute to three important factors: 1. Zillions of bottles of cheap Chianti wrapped in straw. The Italians shipped them over here by the fleet in the ’50s and ’60s. The wine tasted just like the straw–in fact, it tasted just like the bilge water in those damned ships. What did we ever do to Italy to deserve this? And then, as if the wine wasn’t bad enough already, Italian restaurants across the country used the bottles for candlesticks. Wax drips all over the bottles looked just like multicolored bird droppings and were supposed to tell you the food was “authentic.” Go figure.

2. Guilt by association. Up until fairly recently, virtually all American jug wines were made by the same folks who brought you Boone’s Farm, Annie Green Springs, and Ripple. This isn’t what one would call a viticultural pedigree.

3. A photo published in Rolling Stone in January 1970 of a Hell’s Angel at Altamont happily swigging from a giant jug of Red Mountain burgundy. On the next page, a photo of the same guy beating people over the head with a pool cue. Dinner-party hosts took note of the cheap wine/behavior relationship.

Despite all, I love jug wines. Well actually, I love the idea of jug wines–their unpretentiousness, their common-man forthrightness, their wine-for-calloused-hands soul. When the quality of a good jug wine matches the idea, well, that’s what everyday wine-drinking is all about. And the truth is, humble as jug wines may be, they are the key to getting this country to drink more wine. If the wine industry wants more people to enjoy more wine with more meals (and it surely does), then the way to do it is by producing more and better low-cost jugs, not more and better $20-a-bottle-and-up wines for the elite.


Janet Orsi

A Jug and Thou: Mass-market wines do well toward serving a full house.

The key to liking them is keeping expectations low. Jugs aren’t Rembrandts, they’re house paint, but you wouldn’t want to cover your garage door with masterpieces, would you? Unfortunately, because jug wines are made from juice that no one wants for something better, and because the wine industry right now is beset with a juice shortage, the quality of jug wines at the moment is, frankly, as low as it’s ever been. Thus, a few shopping rules:

Never buy jug varietals: jug cabernet sauvignon, chardonnay, merlot, etc. Stick with the blends, which are labeled (for a red wine) “table red,” “vintner’s red” or, yes, even burgundy. Turning cab into a jug wine is like putting a BMW engine into a Winnebago. The only possible exceptions to this rule–emphasis on possible–are zinfandel and sauvignon blanc.

Reds tend to be better than whites.

Generally, you get what you pay for. Don’t look for deals in jugs. A $10 jug’s going to taste $5 better than a $5 jug every time.

Here are three jugs I’ve lately enjoyed when I wasn’t shooting pool:

James Arthur Field
California Red Wine

Jim Field up in Healdsburg has dedicated his life to making a better jug wine, which is sort of like dedicating your life to making a better boxer short–but, hey, we need those, too. “Basic” is the descriptive word here: Field’s red is all brick and no filigree. He doesn’t say on his elegantly simple label (which features only his signature) what’s in this wine, but I taste quite a bit of ruby cabernet and maybe some petite sirah. He’s probably got some zin in there, too. Whatever it is, it has the acidity to accompany heavy tomato sauces and ribs gooey with barbecue. This is an ideal wine for group feeds. Another admirable trait: Both Field’s red and white are remarkably consistent from year to year. Two stars. $6.99.

R.H. Phillips Dunnigan Hills
“Night Harvest” Sauvignon Blanc

The label says, “We pioneered night harvesting to protect the delicacy and freshness of our grapes and preserve their varietal character.” So how come no one else is doing it? Night or not, this is an above-average jug white showing surprisingly good varietal character. Some call sauvignon blanc “poor man’s chardonnay,” which is not necessarily a slight–this Phillips has the apricot sweetness of a well-balanced sauvignon blanc hiding behind a tart forward presentation. Enjoy a glass while preparing dinner, and then another with dinner. It won’t impress your friends, but it will make your salad taste oh-so-much better. Two and a half stars. $9.75.

Valley of the Moon
“Harvest Nights” California Red Table Wine

So maybe this night thing is spreading. Whenever its grapes are picked, this is a jug red for folks who need something soft and easy at the end of the day. You won’t overexercise your taste buds or tax your brain with this as you might with some fancy varietal, you won’t chop through tannins as you must with some of the cheap big boys, and yet you won’t mistake this for a white. This Valley of the Moon blend is as soft as your favorite chair–fuzzy at the edges, warm in the center. Smells good, too. I think a tasty piece of beef might knock it out with a single punch, but it’d go great with bread and cheese or light pasta. Two stars. $7.49.

From the April 17-23, 1997 issue of Metro

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1997 Metro Publishing, Inc.

The Godfather

0

Little Deaths

By

The Godfather presents the rise, the fall, and the absorption into the American master class of a family named Corleone. Their family fortune, like so many other fortunes, has been made from graft and gambling. We see the terrible Sicilian village they came from, a pile of bones guarded by men with guns. And we see them exiting into another desert, as they go to tend the newborn Las Vegas. Along the way, the family is whittled down by murders which leave behind both the weak and the unbending, who are just as bad as the weak. The warning of their patriarch goes unheard: “A man without a family is not a man.”

At the opening of The Godfather, Don Vito Correleone (Marlon Brando) is receiving friends and associates at his daughters’ wedding day; and in this opening scene, Don Vito is dispensing favors and asking for fealty. He’s a lord in his new country; and his sons are groomed for the succession–he gives them the rules of an aristocrat’s life: To keep your friends close and your enemies closer, to never let anyone outside your family know what you’re thinking.

But Vito hasn’t been able to pass on his best qualities to his sons: Sonny (James Caan) is spoiled, and he doesn’t have Vito’s life-preserving coolness of temper; Fredo (the ill-fated actor John Cazale) is a weakling, and Michael (Al Pacino) is trying to remove himself from the influence of the family, through his status as a war hero, and through his marriage to a good American woman named Kay (Diane Keaton). No doubt Kay’s innocence about the way the world works is part of Michael’s attraction to her. The Godfather‘s real tragedy is how despite his efforts, Michael is sucked back into the way of the Coreleones. By inheriting the family business, Michael Coreleone paradoxically loses his own family and is destroyed.

Michael’s damnation–his insistence on revenge after an insult, and his subsequent exile–is presented as a slow slide, and it’s contrasted with a wealth of details. Coppola could have made a name for himself on any of the passages here, from the wedding scene, to the reception in the shadows of his study–Gordon Willis’s tenebrous photography changed the notion of how a movie should look from that point on. But Michael’s exile in Sicily is an especially exciting chapter in the film.

The passage is rich, without lushness–Coppola doesn’t swoon over Italian countryside like everyone else who brings a camera there. Coppola shows you the bald hills, the stones, the sun, the anxiousness of the people to get out of Sicily. Seemingly everyone Michael meets during his exile is trying to learn English in hope of immigrating. Michael visits the village of Coreleone, and instead of being a haven of hearty peasants, it’s a war zone, an eerie white-washed town, with widows in black, and plaques memorializing the dead men who picked each other off.

Coppola presents to us a Sicily wracked with vendettas–you don’t leave the house without your rifle. The basic story in the Sicilian sequence in The Godfather is of Michael’s courtship and loss of a heartbreaking village girl named Appollonia (the rose-breasted Simonetta Stefanelli). So much else is going on in the sequence, especially Michael asserting himself, essentially demanding a courtship from the girl’s father. It’s the first moment, when we see him sitting in the presence of a frightened but proud old man, where we see how ruthless Michael is becoming.

The tension in The Godfather takes place between an America where you can too easily lose your soul, and a home country where you can too easily lose your life. It’s matched with another tug of war between the pull of the family’s love, and the bloodiness that you endure to stay inside one. One of the key performances in the history of film is Marlon Brando’s hoarse, paunchy, regal Don Vito Corleone, the “lionheart”–no wonder you keep thinking of dying chivalry when you watch him. “Gravitas” was the Roman word for the most manly of virtues; it means the sense of being weighted by one’s own sincerity. Hence the word ‘gravity.’ Brando has this here, radiating a bottomless sense of authority.

Brando’s fatherliness is so compelling that it was the text of an entire other movie (a comedy, The Freshman, 1990); those of us who have had uneasy relations with our own fathers watch Brando with a pang of longing: if only we could have been sheltered, nourished, advised, loved, by a father like that! The burst of daylight when you leave the theater brings you back to your senses. Having a father like that costs more than most of us are willing to pay. (Thus conscience doth make Fredos out of us all.)

It’s surprising to remember that Brando was generally considered too young for the part at the time The Godfather was released in 1972. You see Brando here, padded, made up artfully with liver spots, cheeks padded with cotton, his voice lowered to an almost inaudible rumble–Don Coreleone is not a man who has to raise his voice. Just hopelessly calling Brando’s Don Vito what it is–one of the key performances in American film–doesn’t give credit to Brando’s humor here, his subtlty, the irony of the Don when, as close to choler as he gets, he confronts a whining movie star who is also a Friend of the Family (Al Martino). And Brando’s final moment in a garden in deep summer–the soundtrack silent except for the babbling of a toddler, and the hum of cicadas–is a death scene no one will ever forget.

Coppola is a musician’s son, and his intelligent selection of the fine Italian composer Nino Rota is appropriate to the weight of the tragedy. The two main themes are sparse but tremendously moving: a lamenting waltz for the dying of the old order, a love theme that’s a reminder of bittersweetness of duty to the family. There’s about a half-dozen deathless performances here. Some favorites, among the smaller lives devoured to make the Corleones great: Lenny Montana’s punch-drunk, pathetically loyal Luca Brazzi, who dies staring straight at us, and Robert Duvall’s Tom Hagen, who, by an accident of birth, will never really be in the inner circle of the Corleones, even though he gives his life for the family. (And of course, Brando’s near unmatched aura of paternalism makes Tom Hagen’s exclusion all the more sad.)

I’d want to remember the hatefulness of Sterling Hayden as police Capt. McCluskey–onscreen but a few minutes but as vivid a performance of cop gone wrong as Harvey Keitel’s Bad Lieutenant or Orson Welles’s Hank Quinlan. The obese Richard Castellano, a kind of mirthless clown, is often the viewer’s tour guide, explaining the customs of the mob–it’s his tips that explains what it means if you recieve a parcel containing a coat wrapping a dead fish, his lonely bulk on a folding cot that shows you where the expression “to go on the mattress” comes from. You could have made a whole movie out of any one of the characters. In a sense, director Francis Ford Coppola did.

Of all of the phenomenal things about this film, the performances, music, and photography, its range of moods and sub-plots–what amazes you the most is how of a piece The Godfather is. Three dozen characters are here, and none of them are stinted, none of them are clichés. Nothing-special actors like Abe Vigoda show a dignity that’s ennobled them ever since. The acts of violence that part the members of the cast from their lives are “nothing personal–just business,” as a black running joke has it.

The Godfather has its resonance because it reflects on all business, all the little deaths a person has to endure just to stay alive. A nation of great wealth and great spirituality is bound to rest uneasy. Everyone knows how much money there is in America. As George Bush once said, and presumably he’d know, America is the most religious country in the world. That’s why the probably the finest American novel, The Great Gatsby, and the finest American films–Greed, Citizen Kane, and The Godfather–are haunted by the biblical warning from Mark 8:36: “What shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world and lose his own soul?” The death of the soul in The Godfather is presented with such conviction that even an atheist can feel the loss of something intangible, when watching the final shot of the doors closing on Michael Corleone.

Web exclusive to the April 17-23, 1997 issue of the Sonoma County Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1997 Metrosa, Inc.

Talking Pictures

0

Grace Notes


How Sweet the Sound: Folksinger Joan Baez is on the road to paradise.

Photo by Dan Borris



Joan Baez on the power of music

By David Templeton

Writer David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This time out, he sees the hard-hitting POW drama Paradise Road, along with the legendary folksinger Joan Baez.

I AM SINGING “Amazing Grace” with Joan Baez. We’re seated at a back table of an almost-empty coffeehouse, sharing a plate of poppyseed cake, and I’m doing most of the singing. (Baez joins in, I suspect, mainly to cover the sound of my voice.) Other patrons are either staring or pretending not to notice, and we are singing the well-known hymn to the tune of the “Happy Wanderer.” Baez, it turns out, never knew you could do that.

“If you’d have tried to sing it that way to me 10 years ago,” she laughs, “I’d have shot you.” I understand. “Amazing Grace” is as almost as much of a Joan Baez theme song as “Diamonds and Rust.”

“You can also sing it to the tune of the theme song from Gilligan’s Island,” I mention, at which we both sing, “Amazing Grace, how sweet the sound, that saved a wretch like me,” to Gilligan’s bouncy melody. “You can sing it to almost anything,” I point out, as she tests the lyrics on the melody of “Jingle Bells.” Another perfect fit. More laughter. And to think this began as a serious conversation.

We’d been discussing the film Paradise Road, a powerful drama based on the true accounts of female POWs in World War II who formed a vocal orchestra to keep their spirits alive while captives of the Japanese on the island of Sumatra. The cast (including Glenn Close, Frances McDormand, and Julianna Margulies) is uniformly excellent, the story avoids maudlin sentimentality, and the music–re-created from the actual scores written down by the captives–is magnificent.

Remarkably, we almost saw another film–The Saint (Joan’s choice)–until Paradise rolled along. “A friend of mine went and saw The Saint,” Baez informed me, with a what-can-I-do grin, as we met at the theater. “She understands how I feel about Val Kilmer. I think I’m still going to have to see it.”

Baez, who is just wrapping up a new album–as yet untitled, it will be released this September–has tried in recent years to shake some of the protest-queen image she’s been saddled with since the 1969 Woodstock festival, placing increased emphasis on her voice (she’s been working with a vocal coach for the last 15 years) and the music itself. The new album will feature several songs from new writers, as well as a few from rising folksinger Dar Williams.

Tonight’s film, in which music becomes a convincing symbol of strength and humanity (one Japanese soldier has a more difficult time seeing his prisoners as inhuman after he’s heard them sing), elicited repeated sighs and gasps from Baez, as she became caught in the music’s spell.

“It was incredibly powerful,” she agrees, liberating a forkful of cake from the plate. “As soon as you do something in the form of resistance–something that brings out the humanity in people–that’s when your own spirit grows, as opposed to, you know, wanting to get one of the Japanese and stick his head on a pole.”

There is a famous moment during Baez’s controversial, border-crossing tour of Vietnam during the height of the war, when Baez and her companions were forced into a bomb shelter for 11 days. Under a constant barrage of artillery, Baez found that only by singing was she able to stave off panic–her own and that of the shelter’s other occupants.

“Later,” she relates, “as we were getting ready to leave Hanoi, there was another raid, another bomb shelter. It was full of wounded Polish and Cuban military, all these languages, and I started sing, ‘Hush little baby, don’t say a word.’ I know they couldn’t have understood a word of it, but I could sense the mood shift. In that moment we were all unified.”

I tell Baez about singing nonsense songs with my daughters the night their mother died of cancer. She nods appreciatively. “It becomes almost a grace, to be able to sing at moments like that,” she says.

“What song or piece of music would have the most sustaining effect on you,” I ask, “if you were in a situation like the one in Paradise Road?”

“I would want to sing something that everybody could sing,” she replies after a moment’s thought. “The first thing that comes to mind, believe it or not, is ‘Kumbiya,’ which I don’t sing anymore–unless I’m in a place like Romania. Like with ‘We Shall Overcome.’ I won’t sing it in a country that isn’t involved in that kind of a battle, because then it’s just nostalgia.

“But if we were in that kind of situation, either of those songs would do just fine, because they would ring every bell in the conscious and unconscious bell-ringing chamber of people’s heads.”

It is now that I mention “Amazing Grace,” offering my demonstration of its versatile nature.

“See?” Baez laughs delightedly. “Music crosses all boundaries.”

From the April 17-23, 1997 issue of the Sonoma County Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1997 Metrosa, Inc.

Latin Rock

0

Raza Rock


Rock as Salvation: Punk singer Roco of the Mexican band Maldita Vecindad.

Photo by Maria Madrigal



New CD showcases Latin rock explosion

By Greg Cahill

I THINK THAT ROCK CAN SERVE as a tool for social change,” says guerrilla artist and rock documentarian Ruben Guevara, who once collaborated with Frank Zappa on the doo-wop parody group Ruben and the Jets. “I mean, I’ve been a rocker all my life. Aesthetically, rock is to me a form to communicate confrontation and challenge the status quo.

“I’ve held to that credo all my life.”

For Guevara, that perspective provided the driving force behind his latest project, Reconquista! The Latin Rock Invasion (Zyanya/Rhino), a vibrant compilation of defiant Spanish-language anthems designed to ignite, shake, and rattle the psychic core of society.

“Many of the songs in this collection are simply blues in a different and broader context,” explains Guevara, during a phone interview from his East L.A. home. “Rock and the blues have evolved in Latin America as a way of purging the horrors of history.

“Latin rock has become a raw sensory channel, airing wounds of terror, anger, and sorrow. Rock as exorcism. Rock as salvation. Rock as grace.”

It’s a real eye-opener for gringos. After all, you can count on one hand the number of Latin musicians who have broken through to the mainstream: Richie Valens, Julio Iglesias, Los Lobos, Gloria Estefan. Indeed, the death of Tejano singing star Selena–the subject of a new major motion picture–stunned the mass media, in part,because few knew about the enormous extent of her popularity within the Latin community.

“That’s a real good commentary on U.S. society in general,” Guevara reflects. “It just shows how departmentalized we are and how afraid we are to listen to stuff that’s in our own backyard. We’re just not very open to other cultures.

“I think it’s time to be a little more adventurous, a little more courageous.”

Visceral and passionate, the 17-track Reconquista! is a good place to start. Stylistically diverse, the criteria for inclusion required, not hits, but bands that are “saying something and saying it with power and passion,” Guevara says, specifically Latin rock bands that focus on social and political commentary.

“One of the first bands that I heard that totally knocked me out was Mano Negra, who were originally from Spain before getting kicked out of the country and moving to Paris,” he adds. “The first song I heard them perform was ‘Viva Zapata,’ an homage to the Zapatista rebels fighting Mexican government forces in the Chiapis region. I was blown away that they were politically aware and well informed and that they were actually doing a piece dedicated to that struggle.

“That set the tone for the compilation.”

One of the most chilling songs on the compilation is “El Matador,” in which Los Fabulosos Cadillacs of Argentina memorialize a Chilean poet–nicknamed El Matador–who had his hands amputated by police before thousands of horrified onlookers at a packed soccer stadium. His crime: writing seditious poetry.

“It was a brutal act and one that should be remembered,” Guevara says. “I mean, here was a man who did nothing more than tell the truth and he had his hands amputated in modern times!”

THE SPANISH BAND Seguridad Social deliver a bold condemnation of the conquest of Central and South America by Spanish conquistadors in the 15th and 16th centuries. “I think it offers incredible unity for Latins because even the Chicanos hold animosity toward Spain for the colonization and the repression,” Guevara says.

“We are the result of that–after all, our parents and grandparents moved up here because of economic oppression directly connected to the colonization and the conquest.

“History lives and bad memories are hard to put aside.”

On “JFK,” Nagu Gorriak–from the Basque region of Spain–debunk the Camelot myth that paints President John Kennedy as the superfriend of the world, even contending that Kennedy once conspired with dictator Gen. Francisco Franco to back an invasion of the countryside with American B-52s and U.S. Marines.

“In my estimation, not even the Clash are as strong as them,” Guevara says. “They can switch from punk-metal to salsa so fast that you can’t even imagine that they’re the same band.”

“Un Gran Circo” by Maldita Vecindad y Los Hijos del 5 Patio (The Children of the Fifth Caste of the Damned Neighborhood) is an eclectic mix of ska, rai, and carnaval drumming that centers around the main square in Mexico City, the original site of the Aztec temples long since demolished and replaced by a Catholic cathedral. Today, the square hosts a circuslike parade of beggars, protesters, and firebreathers.

The band, one of the top rock acts in Mexico, is now being courted by major labels in the United States.

“I hope that it sparks some interest in the non-Latin community as well,” Guevara says of the compilation. “Musically speaking, I think that it’s very interesting and fresh.

“I’d like it to connect with the world-beat audience.”

Unfortunately, Rhino Records has decided to issue the liner notes only in Spanish, though an English translation is available by mail or on the label’s Website.

IN MANY WAYS, Reconquista!–the first in a series of compilations focusing on domestic and worldwide Latin music–is the culmination of more than 30 years’ work. Born and raised in Los Angeles, Guevara recorded in the early ’60s with the Apollo Brothers doo-wop group. In 1971, he met Frank Zappa. “Our interests in music were similar, from doo wop to Bartok. And I was interested in rock theater,” Guevara explains.

Zappa, who three years earlier had created the doo-wop parody band Ruben and the Jets for a recording, suggested that Guevara put together a stage version of the band. “At the time, it seemed like a good opportunity, but I was burned out on rock: the flaky musicians and the low-paying gigs,” he recalls.

“I told Frank, ‘It sounds good, but there are just too many detours in rock.’

“He told me, ‘You know, man, you’ve got to build your own roads.’

“So I said, ‘Let’s go for it.’ “

GUEVARA RECORDED two albums with the band on the Mercury label, the first produced by Zappa. “That lasted three or four years,” he says. “We split up and I started writing material that focused on more social and political issues.

A few years later, Guevara became one of the first artists on Rhino when label president Richard Foos in 1976 asked him to record a doo-wop version of the “Star Spangled Banner.” In 1983, Guevara returned to compile the two-volume Los Angelenos: The East Side Renaissance, featuring his band Con Safos and chronicling the then-emerging East L.A. roots rock scene (Los Lobos bowed out because of contractual problems), and a third album spotlighting the best of the Midnighters, the pioneering Latin rock band.

“Those proved informative to the rock press, which at that point didn’t really know about the body of work we had contributed as a community,” Guevara says. “But they didn’t do well commercially.”

He later worked as a performance artist, but in 1990 approached Foos about reactivating the label’s Latin music subsidiary.

“The vision then was to cover the whole U.S. Latin music scene, from the 1940s to the present.”

Foos agreed. In 1993, Guevara started planning a Raza music series, spanning 50 years of Latin rock. When he realized that there were no compilations focusing on the broad global Latin rock scene, Guevara went back to Foos and suggested that they start there and work their way backwards.

The result is Reconquista!

“My whole thing as an artist has been to confront the status quo and to make people look at our humanity with a new perspective and then to celebrate it,” he says.

“We all need to be revitalized by rock ‘n’ roll. The material on Reconquista! is meant to make us reflect and dance at the same time.

“With that combination, how can you lose?”

From the April 17-23, 1997 issue of the Sonoma County Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1997 Metrosa, Inc.

Hawaiian Music

0

Island Style


In Tune: Ledward Kaapana appears with other masters of the style on April 23.

Photo by Paul Schraub



Three Hawaiian slack-key guitar greats play at LBC

By Traci Hukill

HAWAIIAN CHEESE is legendary. Screaming aloha shirts and matching muumuus, tins of macadamia nuts sold for their weight in gold, the same syrupy-sweet strains of steel guitar dripping from the Muzak system in every airport, restaurant, and store–all bespeak the tourist industry’s unswerving devotion to schlock.

But they’re not fooling the Hawaiians. From Ka’u in the south of the Big Island to Haena in the north of Kauai, folks still come home from work, plop down on the couch with their guitars, tune them ki ho’alu style–Hawaiian for “slack the key”–and settle in for an evening of playing music and talking story. A lilting, relaxing style that fuses elements from folk, country, ukulele, and good ol’ campfire music, slack key has been around for 150 years and just keeps gaining popularity.

Slack key–which can now be heard stateside, thanks to an ambitious series on pianist George Winston’s eclectic Dancing Cat label–owes its existence to a few quirky circumstances. In 1832, King Kamehameha III hired Spanish and Mexican cowboys to control a cattle population run amok on the Big Island. The paniolos, as the Hawaiians called them (from español), brought guitars and played them around campfires at night. After they’d taught the Hawaiians the best of their cowboyish arts in the way of cattle damage control, they returned home, some generous souls leaving their guitars behind with the Hawaiians.

The official word is that the islanders adapted the tunings to their own music. In the un-PC and more entertaining version, however, no one remembered to show the Hawaiians how to tune their new instruments, and so sprang up a number of creative region-specific tunings that eventually assumed such whimsical names as “Wahine,” “Taro Patch,” and “Mauna Loa.”

Until the ’70s ushered in a resurgence in cultural pride and encouraged slack-key masters like Gabby Pahinui and Atta Isaacs to go public with their considerable knowledge, slack key was steeped in secrecy. Families so jealously guarded tunings and techniques that performers used to turn their backs to tune their guitars. Today, the tunings for each song are listed in the CD jewel case jacket, and would-be slack-key players can take university classes or learn from how-to videos and books.

Keola Beamer, Ledward Kaapana (with Bob Brozman), and George Kahumoku Jr. will perform the sounds of Hawaii next week at the Luther Burbank Center in Santa Rosa.

They are nurturing a style steeped in rich tradition. George Kuo–who has been playing slack key since the ’70s, the height of the so-called Hawaiian Renaissance–picked up tips from buddies and later from masters like Ray Kane and Pahinui. Kuo developed a silvery, precise, almost cerebral style of playing that nods to the old school of the ’30s and ’40s even as it flirts with jazz and improv, especially when he’s playing with his part-time band, the Sons of Hawaii.

“But we don’t go overboard,” insists the soft-spoken Kuo. “We try to keep it the old style.”

The Rev. Dennis Kamakahi–who really is an ordained Episcopalian minister, although he presides only “when they need the help”–enjoys the distinction of being one of Hawaii’s most popular songwriters. His song “Wahine ‘Ilikea” splashed across the islands when the now-defunct Hawaiian Style Band recorded a pop version of the song in the early ’90s. Like Kuo, Kamakahi started young, practicing his first chops on a ukulele as a tyke of 3 and moving on to slack key in high school. Kamakahi’s style of playing is warm and vibrant, each song a soulful consideration.

Indeed, most slack-key guitarists take their art to heart. “In my family, music was taken very seriously,” says Beamer, who wrote “Honolulu City Lights,” one of the most popular Hawaiian songs of all time. His most recent album, Mos’uhone Kika: Tales from the Dream Guitar, appeared on Billboard’s chart of top world music. “Music was an integral part of our lives, almost like religion,” he adds. “But Hawaiians are up against a shallow stereotype, often demeaning to our native culture.”

Keola Beamer, Ledward Kaapana (with Bob Brozman), and George Kahumoku Jr. perform Wednesday, April 23, at 7:30 p.m. at the Luther Burbank Center, 50 Mark West Springs Road, Santa Rosa. Tickets are $17.50 for adults; $15 for juniors and seniors. Call 546-3600 for details.

From the April 17-23, 1997 issue of the Sonoma County Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1997 Metrosa, Inc.

Sonoma County Public Library

0

Virtual Stacks


Janet Orsi

Digital Data: The library system’s Website is getting 10,000 hits a month, growing 10 to 15 percent a year.

Public Library’s Internet branch comes of age

By Bruce Robinson

SURE, SURFING THE WEB is great entertainment. But when you positively need to find out something absolutely, specific right now, plodding through lists of links in hopes of stumbling onto the facts you seek is not such an appealing enterprise.

Who ya gonna call?

How about Bo Simons? “After you get tired of clicking around and you really want to get somewhere, that’s when some kind of expertise and knowledge of how knowledge works is useful,” offers Simons, the Internet librarian at the Sonoma County Public Library.

“The one thing librarians offer to the world of the Web is experience in dealing with people finding information for millennia,” he elaborates. “What I bring to it is a feel for the way information travels, an instinct for what constitutes a good reliable source, being able to check currency and accuracy pretty quickly.

“It’s easy to click from here to there–finding things is what’s tough.”

In order to facilitate such searches, Simons has developed a home page for the Sonoma County library. The site has been in operation for nearly three years, but it is now getting expanded just in time for National Libraries Week. The service offers immediate access to many of the library’s reference works, as well as connections to other sources elsewhere on the Internet.

The local resources include the entire Sonoma County Public Library catalog, an index of periodicals and their contents (with links to the full text of many of the articles), the full community resource library, an index of local groups and organizations that the library has developed, and the archives of the Wine Library in Healdsburg, plus data about local employers and other useful information for job-seekers.

You can also find the locations and hours of operation of all county library branches. The access to the library’s catalog allows library patrons to reserve books and to see if those books placed on hold are awaiting pick-up–two heavily used services. These services can also be reached without going through the Internet; computer users can “dial up” the library directly via their modems and local phone lines. Internet users need a “telnet” utility in order to connect to the catalog files.

“Our goal is to make the library more usable to more people,” explains Roger Pearson, director of Library Services for Sonoma County. “With more people buying computers every day, we also want to make as much of the library as possible available 24 hours a day. The computer is tireless, and its capacity is just phenomenal. Even if we get 20,000 people dialing in, we don’t have to hire more staff.”

“I really see this as an answer to our problems of providing more access.”

Pearson says that the library’s Website registers 10,000 to 11,000 “hits” a month, “so we know that a lot of people do use it.” But he adds, “We don’t know what their success rate is in finding what they’re looking for.” Still, use of the digital data services is growing 10 to 15 percent annually, which he considers “good and healthy, considering our check-outs are going down 2 percent.”

Right now, computer users can make more use of the library’s online resources from home than is possible from within the library itself, although the library is working hard to change that situation. “We offer text-based Internet access through our public access, but our current cabling is not adequate for graphics,” Pearson says. “Even at the Central Library [at the corner of Third and E streets in downtown Santa Rosa], we only have one terminal that’s offering Netscape access.”

Upgrading the electronic infrastructure costs about $12,000 at each branch, money that is not available in the library’s operating budget. Instead, local Friends of the Library groups have been working to raise funds for that work, through such innovative efforts as the “Virtual Auction” held at the Sebastopol branch last month, which raised nearly $30,000. Rohnert Park obtained a grant from Longs Drugs to support the upgrading of two branches, while O’Reilly & Associates, a computer publishing and software firm in Sebastopol, has “been helping us with some of the cabling, and even doing some of the work,” Pearson says.

As a result of all these interlocking efforts, he adds, “Sebastopol will probably be up and running with four or five Netscape PCs in the next three or four months, and Petaluma is just about ready to go.”

Meanwhile, there are grand plans for the unseen technical side of the Internet site, too. “We would like to put in a CD-ROM server that has subscriptions to major reference works,” such as Consumer Reports, says Pearson, “so that at 10 at night you can do some research on buying a washing machine or a new car.”

Online access to investment information via the library is another goal.

However, says Jim Rosachi, manager of the library’s technical services, adding these types of services “can be $20,000 to $30,000 just for the equipment, and who knows how much more for the license for the information,” money that is not in the library budget.

“We don’t have a timeline for that,” he adds. “It’s just something we know would be useful information.”

From the April 17-23, 1997 issue of the Sonoma County Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1997 Metrosa, Inc.

The Scoop

Cut the Deck

By Bob Harris

ONCE AGAIN, casino gambling hit the ballot last fall in such exotic resorts as Cleveland, Springfield, and Spokane. If you believe the used-car dealers, real estate moguls, and other various leeches financing these campaigns, the hot cash will provide the townfolk with better schools, libraries, snake oil, and lounge bands.

Of course, gambling produces no tanglible product to which labor and ingenuity add value. All-night Keno, free piña coladas, and community college girls dressed like a Joe Eszterhas stroke fantasy aren’t the same as a rebuilt manufacturing base. The best this casino/skybox/trade-zone bullshit can do is rearrange wealth, not create it. Which means that the minute Toledo and Fort Wayne offer looser slots, the money blows town.

What to do when the city council bets your future on a roulette wheel? Simple. Beat them at their own game. Play their blackjack, count their cards, and use their own money against them. It ain’t as hard as you’re supposed to think. Besides, revolution is supposed to be fun.

Here’s your things-to-do list:

Learn the basic strategy. Computers long ago figured out the optimal play in each situation, and the grid is published in a half-dozen books at the mall. My Cliffs Notes version: Hit anything up to 9. Split only 8’s and aces. Double on 10 or 11 if the dealer has a low card (2-6). Otherwise hit. Stand on 12-16 if the dealer has a low card (2-6). Otherwise hit. Stand on 17-21. This oversimplifies the computer model, but it works OK, and–bonus–you can actually remember it.

Start your count at zero. Add one for every low card (2-6) in play, and subtract one for every high card (10-ace). Ignore 7’s, 8’s, and 9’s; reset at zero when they reshuffle. Since dealers have to hit bad hands and you don’t, you win more often when the undealt deck is rich in face cards. The count is how you keep track.

Start with minimum bets. When the count is higher than the number of undealt cards, bet more (but keep it at twice minimum until you’re flush). If the count gets below minus-5 or so, wander away for a while. That’s it.

(OK, here’s No. 4: don’t listen to anybody nearby who seems to know better. If they were that smart, they wouldn’t be in a casino.) Of course, the house has pit bosses and surveillance cameras watching everybody. No fear. Think “mall security guard.” Still, if you sense heat, stroll. If they narc you, just pick up your chips and leave quietly.

Advanced tip: in Vegas, Atlantic City, or any other festering sleaze pit where Howie Mandel headlines, you can save time by meandering the blackjack area as if looking for a friend. Slow down if there’s a table with a ton of low cards in play. If the next hand is equally faceless, sit your keester down. Play a few hands, then hit the next casino. You’ll save time, improve your odds, and never get caught.

Your town will probably have only the pathetic little riverboat, so you’ll need patience. However, the dealers are usually way slower, and the spread between the minimum and maximum bets is much higher. Enjoy.

It’s perfectly legal, but about as exciting as Charo doing the Macarena. The novelty wears off, and counting by 1’s probably got old about the time you learned not to chew on other people’s furniture. It eases the monotony to think of it as a sit-in with card games.

Just promise to be creative with your loot. Set up a Gamblers Anonymous chapter. Buy newspaper ads explaining why gambling sucks. Start a voter registration drive. Post card-counting info on light poles outside the casino. Run the bastards out of town.

Have fun and do nice things.

My dad bought cigarettes and Lotto tickets at the corner for 20 years. He never won anything. I was working near Tahoe when his lungs gave in. His casket was purchased with blackjack money from Caesar’s.

We figured it was about time he won something.

From the April 17-23, 1997 issue of the Sonoma County Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1997 Metrosa, Inc.

Prairie Oyster

Blue Plate SpecialSenor McQuirePass the Hot Sauce: Prairie Oyster likes their music traditional and country-style.Prairie Oyster serves up some tasty C&W licksBy Greg CahillThere is a haunting moment on "She Won't be Lonely Long," the plaintive opening track on Prairie Oyster's new Blue Plate Special (Vel Vel) disc, in which singer and bassist Russell deCarle evokes a high,...

Welfare Reform

New 'Deal'Protest Vote: After spending 30 years in government fighting poverty in America, Peter Edelman resigned last summer in protest of President Clinton's multibillion-dollar cut in welfare. The new law, he says, will hurt millions of poor children.Photo by Janet OrsiRocking the Boat: Notes from an ex-Clinton appointeeBy Peter EdelmanLAST SUMMER, President Clinton signed welfare legislation that radically...

The Scoop

Hey, Sport ...By Bob HarrisMY OLD CLEVELAND buddy T. (you might know the name, and he prefers privacy) and I recently went to Anaheim to watch the Indians play the Angels. We sat up high and made our predictions. We agreed that (a) while Matt Williams is easier to like than Albert Belle, so are necrotic skin viruses, and...

Jug Wines

Big BoysField of Dreams: The James Arthur Field brand of signature wine is the ideal vino for group feeds.Photo by Janet OrsiIn appreciation of cheap jug wine By Steve BjerklieJUG WINES, ALAS, have a reputation only a skosh above former Clinton adviser Dick Morris' (I mean, he is pond scum), a dismal condition I attribute to three...

The Godfather

Little DeathsBy The Godfather presents the rise, the fall, and the absorption into the American master class of a family named Corleone. Their family fortune, like so many other fortunes, has been made from graft and gambling. We see the terrible Sicilian village they came from, a pile of bones guarded by men with guns. And we see them...

Talking Pictures

Grace NotesHow Sweet the Sound: Folksinger Joan Baez is on the road to paradise.Photo by Dan BorrisJoan Baez on the power of musicBy David TempletonWriter David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This time out, he sees the hard-hitting POW drama Paradise Road, along with the legendary folksinger...

Latin Rock

Raza Rock Rock as Salvation: Punk singer Roco of the Mexican band Maldita Vecindad.Photo by Maria MadrigalNew CD showcases Latin rock explosionBy Greg CahillI THINK THAT ROCK CAN SERVE as a tool for social change," says guerrilla artist and rock documentarian Ruben Guevara, who once collaborated with Frank Zappa on the doo-wop parody group Ruben and the Jets....

Hawaiian Music

Island StyleIn Tune: Ledward Kaapana appears with other masters of the style on April 23.Photo by Paul SchraubThree Hawaiian slack-key guitar greats play at LBCBy Traci HukillHAWAIIAN CHEESE is legendary. Screaming aloha shirts and matching muumuus, tins of macadamia nuts sold for their weight in gold, the same syrupy-sweet strains of steel guitar dripping from the Muzak...

Sonoma County Public Library

Virtual Stacks Janet OrsiDigital Data: The library system's Website is getting 10,000 hits a month, growing 10 to 15 percent a year.Public Library's Internet branch comes of ageBy Bruce RobinsonSURE, SURFING THE WEB is great entertainment. But when you positively need to find out something absolutely, specific right now, plodding through lists of links in hopes of stumbling...

The Scoop

Cut the Deck By Bob HarrisONCE AGAIN, casino gambling hit the ballot last fall in such exotic resorts as Cleveland, Springfield, and Spokane. If you believe the used-car dealers, real estate moguls, and other various leeches financing these campaigns, the hot cash will provide the townfolk with better schools, libraries, snake oil, and lounge bands.Of course, gambling produces no...
11,084FansLike
4,606FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow