Fall Foods

0

Comfort Food

By Gretchen Giles

THERE IS A SATISFYING SAVAGENESS about the fresh foods of summer. The ingredients are either sliced, peeled, grilled, frappéed, or actually torn into stuff for the plate and palate. One often sits around half-nude imbibing such nourishment out in the elemental heat of the waning twilight. And it is not unusual for summer foods to be eaten in small human gatherings around fire, like meals shared by the cave dwellers.

But come autumn we return to our more civilized natures. First off, it’s getting a mite bit chilly for that half-nude thing, and the squirt of a unskinned grapefruit is less satisfying for an October breakfast than a steaming bowl of cinnamon-spiked, raisin-plumped oatmeal enlivened with the sweet grate of an entire Gravenstein apple.

Because the fact is, in the fall, most of us begin to feel terribly like a cat that’s just been spayed–all soft and comfortable, instincts distinctly subdued–with an innate longing for food just as soft and comfortable as we are. Food that is slow-cooked, meats whose roasting overwhelms the scent of the house, the secret tastes of vegetables that are coaxed, dirt-clung, from the loam.

This is the time for casseroles, cassoulets, the fussy work of creamy risotto, stocks and soups and stews, and just most anything that resolves itself into terrific leftovers. The definition of the perfect fall dish is when one can truthfully lean across the table and utter the phrase “This always tastes better the second day.”

Sunday afternoons in old novels are often dominated by the smell of roasting chicken, perfuming the angst and wonder of the protagonist’s childhood, marking the return from church. For those of us whose remembered Sunday afternoon smells include the long-stale odors of parents’ Saturday night parties, a new tradition can be readily founded by opening the oven door and recklessly throwing a panned bird into its maw.

Almost that simple, roasting a chicken is a lot easier than say, pie, which has long held the “easy as” distinction. A lie, this pie, as anyone who’s ever struggled unsuccessfully with rolling pin, ice-cold water, and the grim stick of wet flour can attest.

(Actually paté’s a helluva lot easier to make than pie, but it’s doubtful that the phrase “as easy as paté” will ever catch on like wildfire in American society.)

But chicken’s a cinch when washed and patted dry, the body filled with the quarters of a yellow onion, salt and pepper, half a lemon, and a pungent sprig of fresh rosemary. Splurging on the free-range wisdom of a Rocky chicken makes for the best possible yellow-skinned flavor (and just knowing that the bird spent it’s life happily pecking around at worms in the dirt can help to assuage any guerilla vegetarian emotions that might ambush you at the table).

Being careful not to dwell on the plucked roaster’s resemblance to the heft of a baby, separate the skin of the breast from the meat, and push fresh sage leaves and butter into the two pockets that will form. The butter helps self-roast the bird and the sage will flavor as well as adorn the breast, darkly patterning through the skin as it crisps and goldens. A handful of butter rubbed liberally all over the body helps, too. Just don’t talk a lot about it at dinner.

Tie the bird’s drumsticks together with kitchen twine, tucking the fatty cavity flap (which I will continually call the bishop’s pope and will continually be wrong about) so that it secures the body closed. Place the chicken breast down on a rack in a roasting pan. The elevation of the rack helps prevent the stew-in-your-own-juices phrase taken from the world of poultry and used so liberally in adolescence. Cover loosely with a foiled tent and roast at 400 degrees for 20 minutes. Turn the heat down to 350 and then let 20 minutes a pound be the guide (though don’t actually believe that; the true tests are bloodless juices running from the thigh or breast, and the ability of the drumstick to easily be waved back and forth). Midway through, flip the bird so that the breast browns beautifully. Baste.

MAKING RISOTTO is like courting Elizabeth Taylor: lots of trouble but damn well worth it. Beginning with a base sauté of finely chopped onions, leeks, garlic, and shallots in sweet butter, pour one cup of the Arborio rice in with the onion family and stir to coat, roasting each individual grain until it begins to opalesce slightly. Meanwhile, busily heat 4 cups of either chicken or vegetable stock. Add this hot liquid (which must stay that way) 1/4 cup at a time to the risotto, stirring ably and allowing the stock to be completely absorbed each time. The Arborio package will also say this–believe it. Do this with the repeated ability of a mindless automaton until all the liquid is gone, absorbed, finito. Add a bunch of grated Parmesan and a goodly chop of fresh parsley. Stir, cover, serve.

Fresh crookneck and zucchini squash wrested straight from the failing plants in the garden can be sautéed with plenty of chopped garlic in butter and olive oil. Those purchased and encased in plastic from the local large-chain grocery store taste fine, too–give up that guilt.

Sprinkled at the last moment with fresh oregano, the squash sit well on the plate next to the chicken and rice. A final salad of butter lettuce studded with crunchy bits of chopped pear, crumbled gorgonzola cheese, and toasted walnuts is enlivened with a dressing begun from 1/4 cup balsamic vinegar in a small bowl. Added to that is a teaspoon of Dijon mustard, a grind of pepper and shake of salt, a press of garlic, and a small chop of fresh basil. Stirring constantly with a fork, pour a thin, steady stream of extra-virgin olive oil into the dressing base until it takes on a thick, lustrous quality. Dress the salad to taste. Good bread, a light red wine, candles, kids with napkins in their laps, Miles Davis on the player.

One small happy moment–sometimes it seems immensely selfish to ask for more than that.

From the October 3-9, 1996 issue of the Sonoma Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1996 Metrosa, Inc.

Talking Pictures

0

Bimbo Power


Andy Schwartz

Terrible Troika: Goldie Hawn, left, Diane Keaton, and Bette Midler screech in ‘The First Wives Club.’

Tama Janowitz considers youth and beauty

By David Templeton

Writer David Templeton takes people to interesting movies in an ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This time out, he teams up with Tama Janowitz, author of the ’80s cult-hit novel Slaves of New York, to check out the slapstick comedy The First Wives Club.

IN TAMA JANOWITZ’S newest novel, By the Shores of Gitchee Gumee, an outspoken single mother instructs her children in the facts of life, quizzing them with the question “How far will beauty get you?”

“From 18 to 40!” is their programmed reply. “Longer with plastic surgery!” Later on she tells them, “You can’t judge men by the same standards as women. They have no standards.”

I recall these lessons as I meet Janowitz at a theater in downtown Berkeley, where the New York­based author is conducting a series of Gitchee Gumee readings. We have met to see , starring Bette Midler, Goldie Hawn, and Diane Keaton as 40-something divorcées plotting revenge on the ex-husbands who left them for younger women. It promises to have some of the same juicy, high-spirited male-bashing that Janowitz has made into an art form.

Sadly, cinematic art is nowhere in evidence up on the screen. The film turns out to be loud, shrill, unwise, and unfunny. Following a mid-movie trip to the men’s room, I discover Janowitz standing out in the lobby.

“Are you enjoying the film?” she asks sweetly. I am not. Ten minutes later, we are gleefully ordering milkshakes in an ice cream parlor across the street.

“I was hugely disappointed,” Janowitz intones. “Because to see a woman’s film–a film about women–is very rare, and I was looking forward to it. And normally, I feel such contempt and disgust for these men that do dump their wives and get some 20-year-old replacement–but in this case, I started to actually understand why all the men did it. These women were just so awful.”

Janowitz, whose best-selling 1986 novel Slaves of New York earned her an international cultlike following, has sculpted a reputation as a wry, painfully acute observer of urban human absurdities, the love-hate relationship between the genders (and all the various sexual inclinations contained therein). In Gitchee Gumee–a tremendously funny satire that could start a whole new genre of welfare chic–the narrator is Maude Slivenowicz, an amoral, impoverished 17-year old whose view of sexuality is informed by her encyclopedia-like knowledge of the sex lives of insects.

Janowitz writes affectionately, even optimistically, about her characters, male and female, maintaining an aura of believability that is not belied by the occasional extremism of their actions.

Perhaps if The First Wives Club had tried for some of that believability, Janowitz might have hung around for the end credits.

“I kept thinking these women should go out and get some kind of a life,” she exclaims, jamming her spoon eagerly into her shake. “They had no sympathy, as people just getting revenge on their husbands. There’s no charm in watching people hell-bent on revenge.

“On the other hand, I do really think it’s just awful how it happens so much in our society, that women are left alone as they get older and men are considered more desirable.

“You wouldn’t believe the men in New York,” she continues. “Some of them are millionaires many times over, and they’re the most hideous specimens, completely lacking in charm. Nevertheless, they have any woman they want, presumably because the women want the money.”

As with the acquisitive ultra-bimbos in First Wives, and certainly with the pragmatic Maude Slivenowicz, youth and beauty, while they are had, are powerfully exploitable assets.

“That’s the power that women have in our society,” Janowitz agrees. “You’re 20 years old, young, nubile–you’re feared, you’re hated, and you’re desired. When you get older, no matter how powerful you are, as a woman, you may have power, but you’re not feared anymore, and you’re not desired.”

BEAUTY as exploitable currency has many forms, Janowitz reports. “I know men who just call up the fancy modeling agency and say, ‘Who’s new in town?’ I’m not suggesting [these models are] prostitutes. I’m not sure that these men are even capable of having sex. But it’s the social thing of going out and showing off in public to other men. They’re saying, ‘Look what I’m capable of possessing!’ But it doesn’t work the same way with older women and younger men.

“I was talking to a girlfriend,” she laughs, “and I said, ‘You know, if I died tomorrow, my husband would have so many women comforting him, it wouldn’t be believed. They’re comforting him now because I’m out of town for a week. But if I was alone in New York for a week . . .”

She drops her spoon into a now-empty cup and smiles, letting the silence speak for itself.

Join David Templeton and Tama Janowitz on the World Wide Web for a discussion of First Wives Club on Saturday, Oct. 5, at 4:30 p.m. through CompuServe’s “Native’s Guide to New York” forum.

From the October 3-9, 1996 issue of the Sonoma Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1996 Metrosa, Inc.

Sherman Alexie

Seeing Red


MARION ETTLINGER

Portrait of the artist: Poet, author, and standup comic Sherman Alexie doesn’t smile for the camera.

Author Sherman Alexie is one angry young man

By Gretchen Giles

THERE’S A KILLER on the loose, a lone man with a honed blade and a particular predilection for removing the blue eyes and the hairlines from white heads. Terrorizing Seattle, he silently walks the night streets, embodying that which Caucasians hate the most: the red man. Or is it the red woman? Whatever–whites and reds just don’t mix, each group caroming off each other in a racial fury that lies so close to the surface that we are each and every one of us just a Buck knife away from committing heinous acts of homicidal brutality.

Buy it?

Well, people are buying it by the droves, buoying up sales of Sherman Alexie’s novel Indian Killer (Atlantic Monthly, $22), a whodunit with no who and plenty of anger to go around.

“You know, it’s not like I’m walking around like [Nation of Islam leader] Louis Farrakhan or something,” says Alexie, speaking by phone from his Seattle office. “I don’t live my life with all of this anger, and when I was writing this book, it was cathartic in some ways. Actually it was a very easy book to write, and actually–I enjoyed the process,” he chuckles, “as much as you can enjoy writing a book about interracial murder.”

A Spokane/Coeur d’Alene Indian who grew up on a Pacific Northwest reservation, Alexie knows firsthand of what he speaks. The author of two other books of prose–The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven (Atlantic Monthly, 1993), and Reservation Blues (Atlantic Monthly, 1994)–as well as several books of poetry, at a creaky age of 29, Alexie is coming darn near to his stated goal of publishing some 10 books before he gets really old and turns 30.

A direct result of Alexie’s feeling of being misunderstood, Indian Killer was written in reaction to criticism. “In my first two books of fiction,” he says, “people talked about how dark and depressing they were, how full of Indian angst they were–and they weren’t. They were very funny and comic novels. There was certainly a lot of tragedy, but a lot of comedy as well. So I sort of wrote this book as a response, to kind of give people an idea of the kind of anger and the kind of rage that is in the Indian community, as well as that which is in the white community, directed toward Indians.”

And show it he does, producing matter-of-fact prose delineating white men beating, cussing, raping, verbally abusing, and beating again the modern-day Indian (Alexie’s preferred term). As for the Indian characters in the novel, well, they just laugh–homeless or no, in anger or at peace. Laughter is Alexie’s sinew of characterization for the native peoples.

“Indians are funny,” he says simply. “I mean, the funniest groups of people on the planet that I’ve ever been around are Indians and Jews. So I think that that says something about using humor to ward off centuries of oppression and genocide. I’ve heard Jews make jokes about Hitler. I’ve heard Indians make jokes about Custer–that takes a lot of strength.”

Centering around the slow mental dissolution of John Smith, an Indian of indeterminate lineage adopted into a white family (and presumably going crazy as a result of being raised by whites and denied his true heritage), Indian Killer weaves the many stories of Smith, the Native American activist Marie–so distraught by her color as a child that she sandpapers her face–her psychopathic cousin Reggie, and assorted evil white types who variously appear as Indian wannabes, stupid do-gooders, and racist pigs. This is not pretty reading, nor is it recommended for perusal around the lunch table.

Alexie is unconcerned.

“I figured reaction to the book would be mixed,” he says. “People are freaked out by it. I mean this book to start discussion, I mean this book to be controversial, I mean this book to affect and offend.”

Included in the scenes of Indian Killer is one that deeply affected Alexie in reality. A bright child, he transferred from the reservation schools at a young age, assimilating into the predominantly white institutions of the Seattle area. Seated one afternoon in a pizza parlor with his girlfriend and other friends, young Alexie watched a painfully drunk Native American man stumble into the restaurant, look blankly around, and fall thickly onto a stool. Alexie’s girlfriend leaned forward. “I hate Indians,” she hissed. No one said a word, suddenly acutely aware of Alexie’s skin color.

This scene appears in the pages of Indian Killer, savagely illuminating how it feels to be thus humiliated. “It’s about completely ingrained racism, so ingrained as a fundamental problem that people aren’t even aware of it,” he says. “That’s the problem, that people aren’t even aware of it, and that this young woman whom I loved when I was 14, could be capable of such an incredibly cruel statement.”

Indian Killer wasn’t cathartic enough to wring clean the lifetime of oppression lived by Alexie. “I’m a colonized man,” he stresses, “we’re a colonized people. This is South Africa here, and people don’t want to admit that.

“The United States is a colony, and I’m always going to write like one who is colonized, and that’s with a lot of anger.”

Sherman Alexie reads from and signs Indian Killer on Thursday, Oct. 10, at 7 p.m. Copperfield’s Books, 138 N. Main St., Sebastopol. Free. 823-8991.

From the October 3-9, 1996 issue of the Sonoma Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1996 Metrosa, Inc.

Diversity Symposium

0

Race Matters

By Paula Harris

SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Professor Robert Coleman-Senghor, a 56-year-old African American with gray flecks in his dark hair, leans forward and gazes intently at the sun-struck campus garden, silently formulating his thoughts before speaking in his resonant voice. “People don’t want to talk about race–they feel discomfort–but there’s a need to talk, a need to look at the whole spectrum,” says Coleman-Senghor, who teaches English and American Multicultural Studies at the Rohnert Park campus.

Yet the pending California Civil Rights initiative, which seeks to end racial and gender preferences in affirmative action programs; possible changes in immigration law; and other diversity and civil rights issues are creating confusion, particularly in California, Coleman-Senghor says.

“We are rapidly moving in a more multicultural direction than ever before, but we’re not prepared to deal with it,” he adds.

With this in mind, Coleman-Senghor and several other SSU faculty members are organizing a three-day symposium intended to open up a dialogue on diversity.

The conference, entitled “The Dividing Line: The Legacy of the Doctrine of ‘Separate but Equal’ and the Future of Civil Rights in California,” will also acknowledge the 100-year anniversary of Plessy vs. Ferguson, the U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled in favor of segregation.

The 1896 ruling affirmed a Louisiana statute requiring railway companies to provide “separate but equal” accommodations and facilities for “the white and colored races.”

“‘Separate but equal’ was determined by whites in power and it meant separate bathrooms, separate water fountains, and separate places in the train,” explains Coleman-Senghor, noting that the ruling led to a century of apartheid-like conditions in the Deep South that ended only with the ’60s civil rights movement.

Although subsequent Supreme Court decisions have overruled Plessy vs. Ferguson, many say the impact of that earlier ruling is still felt today. “Present-day events are powerfully infused with the forces of the past. The Plessy vs. Ferguson decision has defined the way we think and go about our daily lives,” says Coleman-Senghor. “The legacy of cultural segregation is still here–we still have ‘red lining,’ where banks won’t provide loans to people in certain areas [defined by race]; and we still have covenants and private clubs [that exclude certain races, religions, and genders].”

He adds that conversations about ethnic differences and questions arising from diversity have to be addressed with frankness and persistence. “This has to be a long process; it cannot be given over to Sesame Street, ” he says. “The images of racial harmony on Sesame Street didn’t translate into the attitudes on the street.”

According to Coleman-Senghor, the moment children leave the benign world of Sesame Street and begin school, they are bombarded with other kinds of images and associations pertaining to race, so they struggle with their identity and end up being separated into ethnic groups, primarily for a sense of protection. “In America, a group identity, in racial terms, is everything,” he says.

While Coleman-Senghor speaks of the “enrichment” of diversity and of tolerance for other races, he eschews the “politically correct” idea that race should be ignored completely.

“We don’t want people to be colorblind,” he says. “Being colorblind means that you don’t recognize my difference, which is not necessarily my physiology, but my whole outlook. We’re not blind to people’s religions, nor do we want to be ethnically blind; we appreciate the idea of the diversity of the nation.

“We are a society that operates on the basis of racial differences, and we do not necessarily have to abandon the idea of recognizing racial differences in order to achieve national unity.”

The symposium will focus on roundtable discussions and small group conversations on issues such as “Plessy and the Culture of Segregation”; “Beyond Black and White: The California Model”; “Can the Arts Transform the Politics of Ethnic Difference?”; and “Does Race Matter?”

“We’re not going to do a black/white thing,” says Coleman-Senghor, referring to similar conferences at Harvard and Princeton universities. “We’re Californians and we’ve got more diversity and differences within this diversity.”

He describes the panel of speakers, which include Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, Native Americans, and African Americans from the business, art, and law communities, as “a microcosm of the community we are already a part of and moving toward.”

Among the many symposium participants, six keynote speakers will frame the discussions: Sherley Ann Williams, critic, poet, educator, and author of Dessa Rose: A Riveting Story of the South During Slavery; Gerald Viznor, poet, novelist, and scholar whose works include Manifest Manners: Post-Indian Warriors of Survivance; Brooke Thomas, author and chair of the English Department at UC Irvine; Angelo Ancheta, attorney and director of the Asian Law Caucus; Frances Aparicio, professor of Romance literature and American culture at the University of Michigan; and George Fredrickson, professor of U.S. history at Stanford University and author of The Arrogance of Race.

“At the heart of Plessy vs. Ferguson is the question of the viability of a national ethos of political and social equality,” says Coleman-Senghor. “We want to ask if it’s possible to achieve a national consensus around the meaning of equal protection and whether or not, as a people, we have the will and means to achieve it.”

“The Dividing Line: The Legacy of ‘Separate but Equal’ and the Future of Civil Rights in California” will be held Friday-Sunday, Oct. 18-20, at SSU, 1801 E. Cotati Ave., Rohnert Park. For more information, call 664-4056 or see the World Wide Web site.

From the October 3-9, 1996 issue of the Sonoma Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1996 Metrosa, Inc.

Great Chefs of Sonoma

0

Haute Stuff

By Zack Stentz

IF SUMMER–to loosely paraphrase Martha and the Vandellas–is when the time is right for dancing in the streets, then what the heck is autumn the appropriate season for? The Sonoma County Harvest Fair, of course! Now in its 22nd year of wine stomps, art shows, food-offs, and enough apples to inspire entirely new laws of motion from Isaac Newton, the fair has this year added an entirely new twist: the Great Chefs of Sonoma Showcase Dinner.

Featuring chefs from four lucky Sonoma County restaurants and catering firms preparing the components for a sumptuous meal based around locally grown agricultural products, this Sonoma County­intensive meal is paired with medal-winning wines.

“I’ve worked years to get this event going,” says Barbara Hom, event organizer and a chef herself for Night Owl Catering. “In the past, a lot of Sonoma County chefs felt the awards night didn’t properly showcase local food, so this is an effort to address that and to highlight local food in conjunction with local wine.”

Selected by an august panel of food industry immortals like Sonoma County’s John Ash and Loretta Keller of Bizou in San Francisco, the wanna-cooks were culled first to 16 finalists, then down to four participants. “We tried to select them on the basis of which entries would go well with each other in one meal,” Hom explains, which rules out any culinary car crashes like Thai salad followed by tortellini.

Local ingredients, imaginative recipes, and inspired combinations promise to make this dinner memorable for the 200 or so assembled guests, beginning with aquaculture provided by Deborah Hazell-Krambs and Sherry Soleski of Santa Rosa’s À la Heart Catering. Planning such starters as fried Bay Bottom Bed oysters with sun-dried tomato aioli and a tart celery root salad, Hazell-Krambs laughs: “It’s funny, isn’t it? We’re here in McDougall-land and we’re serving people fried oysters.”

Grown in the shallows of Tomales Bay, Bay Bottom Bed oysters have emerged in recent years as a favorite at local restaurants, albeit usually in a somewhat squishier form. “We normally sell our oysters raw on the half-shell, because that’s how most places like to serve them,” explains Bay Bottom Beds executive Lisa Jang. “But they [À la Heart] wanted to fry them, and asked us to send a shucker, because they didn’t have any oyster-shuckers.”

Next up on the menu is a palate-clearing sliced tomato salad served with basil, nicoise olives, and shaved smoked pecorino cheese by chef Dan Berman of Santa Rosa’s MIXX bistro.

And at the proverbial center of the plate comes roast leg of lamb with cabernet sauvignon reduction sauce and accompanied by gourmet mushroom-stuffed ravioli and a mélange of vegetables. The cooking is to be done by Sheila Parrott of Santa Rosa’s Mistral restaurant, who relishes the opportunity to deal with a big ol’ Fred Flintstone-sized meat slab and not the smaller, fussier cuts usually found in white-tablecloth restaurants. “We prefer to do it as a whole bone-in leg of lamb,” she says. “It tastes better, and there’s just something satisfying about holding that big leg and slicing into it.”

Also looking forward to the event is Bruce Campbell, co-owner of the Healdsburg-based CK Lamb company providing the meat. “I’ve been involved in growing lambs in Sonoma County since I was 10 years old,” he says, “and to have my lambs be the centerpiece of this meal is very exciting.”

Supplying the dessert course is James Doolittle of Sonoma’s Ristorante Piatti, who will make an apple parmesan crostata with cinnamon gelato, a distinctively Sonoma County take on the childhood favorite of apple pie and ice cream. The abundance of apples and tomatoes gives the entire meal a seasonally appropriate autumnal feel, though the timing of the event did create some headaches for the À la Heart contingent. “It’s a little stressful, because this is really the busiest time of the year for us as caterers,” says Soleski.

“It’s a huge sell for us, using local agricultural products,” she adds. “So many people come to Sonoma County to get married, and they want the food that’s served to be representative of the area they’ve come to.”

Participants also view the event as an opportunity to remind local folk not to take the agricultural abundance of their surroundings for granted. “It’s necessary all the time to remind people where their food comes from,” Jang says. “In an urban environment, it’s very easy to get disconnected from the land and the sea that provide the things we eat.”

The Great Chefs of Sonoma Showcase Dinner takes place at 7:30 p.m. on Saturday, Oct. 5, at the Showcase restaurant at the Sonoma County Fairgrounds. Dinner is $65. The fair is open Oct. 4-6. Friday, 10 a.m. to 8 p.m.; Saturday-Sunday, 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. 1350 Bennett Valley Road, Santa Rosa. $2-$4. 545-4203.

From the September 26-October 2, 1996 issue of the Sonoma Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1996 Metrosa, Inc.

Charlie Hunter

0

Shangomania!


Photo by Jay Blakesberg

Coltrane meets Cobain: Charlie Hunter brings a post-punk sensibility to smooth ’60s-style jazz grooves.

Guitarist Charlie Hunter aims at flannel-clad jazz fans

By Greg Cahill

I THINK ALL MUSICIANS are on a mission, at least the real dedicated ones are on a journey,” says jazzman Charlie Hunter, who sports onstage an eight-string guitar and a wry smirk that hints he is harboring some deep secret. “I mean, I don’t want to get all hippy-dippy, but the goal is to reach the spiritual center of whatever music you’re searching for. In that search, for me, it’s real important to bring in other people and to have it be a real honest scene in which the audience is also part of the music. So it’s now, it’s happening now!”

Taking a short break between sound check and a gig at a small Chapel Hill, N.C., nightclub, the 28-year-old Bay Area jazz phenom slips easily into a reflective mood while fielding yet another phone interview in a busy promotional tour. His latest album, Ready . . . Set . . . Shango! (Blue Note), echoes traces of soul-jazz organist Jimmy Smith as well as the funk-fueled grooves of Horace Silver and others. Guitar Player magazine recently raved about Hunter’s newly expanded quartet and the “sexy smoky early-’60s vibe” evoked by the album. The Los Angeles Times has hailed Shango!–the follow-up to last year’s remarkable Bing, Bing, Bing! (Blue Note)–for making Hunter “one of leaders of a burgeoning, pop-influenced hybrid sound that is turning Gen X-ers on to improvised music.”

Yet Hunter, a Berkeley native who honed his jazz chops at the trendy Up & Down Club in San Francisco’s SoMa District, is reluctant to stake his claim beside such innovative jazz players as saxophonist Steve Coleman, avant-garde bandleader Peter Apfelbaum, or the Downtown denizens of New York’s celebrated Knitting Factory who are helping to reinvent improvisational jazz. “Peter [Apfelbaum] is way ahead of me–miles and miles and miles ahead,” Hunter says modestly. “I’d say that the only people who are really doing what we’re doing is [the New York­based keyboard combo] Medeski, Martin, and Wood, and they’ve been doing it longer, taking improvised music to the people.”

As for his own innovative sound, “It’s jazz music of some kind,” he laughs. “It will all be changing in time because I’ll be changing over time.”

That may sound coy, but Hunter wants to thwart those who lump him in with the acid-jazz movement or whatever flavor-of-the-month is in vogue. “Well, that whole acid-jazz thing is going to wear thin pretty soon and it’s never really applied to us,” explains Hunter, who prefers to call his groove “antacid jazz.”

And then there’s that alternative rock thing. Hunter spent the late ’80s playing guitar for the agit-rap group Disposable Heroes of the Hiphoprisy, but found the experience musically unrewarding. His jazz group has appeared on the Lollapalooza alternative music stage and routinely plays at rock clubs. Most recently, Hunter contributed a track to Primus chief Les Claypool’s new solo album. “That’s getting a lot of attention considering how mediocre my playing is on it,” he quips. “I’m just not a six-string guitar player, but at least I try.”

In his spare time, Hunter dabbles in a side project, a jazz and soul tribute band called T. J. Kirk, which is signed to Warner Bros.

But it’s his eagerness to cover grunge songs that has tied him to the flannel shirt­and­pierced nose set. “I think that because we covered a Kurt Cobain song on the first Blue Note record, people have decided that we’re really into alternative rock. Actually, Nirvana is probably the only alt-rock band that I know,” he adds with a laugh, “but Cobain was a really good songwriter.”

Does he identify with Alternative Nation? “Yeah, I think our music is an alternative to the suit-and-tie club that says you have to be well-to-do and super-intellectual to understand jazz music. We don’t have that attitude. We play at places where people aren’t interested in pigeonholing instrumental music.”

So don’t look for Hunter among the stylish, Italian-suited retro retread pack epitomized by Wynton Marsalis and the so-called young jazz lions. “That’s just not where I’m at,” he says. “I feel a real urgency in life and that’s reflected in my music. It’s my only creative outlet. It’s the only avenue I have to scream about my life and what’s happening in other people’s world. It’s my fail-safe antidote to the world.”

Meanwhile, Hunter is bringing jazz to a crowd that might otherwise stray from it. “I’m very proud of the fact that our audience is very diverse,” he says. “There are a lot of women who come to our shows. There are a lot of kids–and I mean teens and young adults–who bring their parents. And there are a lot of moms and dads who bring their kids. And that makes me feel like we’re doing something right.”

The Charlie Hunter Quartet performs Sunday, Sept. 29, at 7:30 p.m. at the Mystic Theatre, 21 Petaluma Blvd. N., Petaluma. Tickets are $10. 765-6665.

From the September 26-October 2, 1996 issue of the Sonoma Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1996 Metrosa, Inc.

Talking Pictures

0

Fridge Factor

By David Templeton

Writer David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This time out, he sits through the IQ-impaired thriller The Rich Man’s Wife with award-winning mystery novelist Judith Greber.

“Don’t be think badly of me if I cover my eyes during the scary parts,” whispers mystery writer Judy Greber, taking her seat in the darkened theater. “Psycho-killer movies are not really my forte. I prefer my murderers to be somewhat civilized.” Voices low in deference to the three other members of the audience, we embark on a short discussion of the merits of Agatha Christie’s refined bloodshed (“The murderer’s identity was never known till the last moment, all the victims died right on cue, and they all died politely,” my guest points out), until our chat is interrupted by the uncivil, illogical, nonsensically plotted, graphically portrayed mayhem of The Rich Man’s Wife.

Starring Halle Berry as, well, a rich man’s wife, the film quickly kills the hubby off, placing the fresh young widow in danger of being the next victim. The husband’s violent end–in the rain, in a playground, with bullet after bullet ripping him open as the killer, a drifter we’ve already met, leaps about shouting, “Why don’t you just fucking die!”–inspires my mumbled remark, “Not an Agatha Christie kind of death, is it?”

“Certainly not,” comes the reply. “And I think I know who did it.”

Greber is the author of numerous novels, including the successful Amanda Pepper Mystery series, written under the nom de plume Gillian Roberts. The first of the books, Caught Dead in Philadelphia (Ballantine, 1990) won the Anthony Award for Best Friend Mystery. Decidedly old-fashioned, though full of witty, acerbic ruminations on modern life, the series follows a young Philadelphia English teacher with a keen knack for sleuthing. The endings are morally satisfying and the victims do tend to die politely. In With Friends Like These … (Ballantine, 1993), the victim dies of poisoned fruit tarts. The latest novel, The Mummer’s Curse (Ballantine, 1996), begins with a feathered parade participant dropping dead with a graciously received bulletin his head.

The author lives in Tiburon, Calif., and has gone to matinees only twice in her life, today being the second time.

“I know a guy who used to write these kinds of movies. He still does, so he shall remain nameless,” Greber discloses, stirring her iced tea as we discuss the film in a nearby cafe. “I think he was the one who said, ‘You know, we just make it move fast.’ Because if a film moves fast enough, you won’t get that it doesn’t make sense.

“It’s the ‘refrigerator factor.’ Have you ever heard of that? It’s when, in the middle of the night, after you go to the refrigerator for a snack or something, and you open the door and the light comes on, you suddenly go, ‘Wait a minute! Wait a minute! Where did–blugh!'”

I understand instantly.

“‘Blugh’ stands for everything we wonder about in movies, from ‘If she is telling this story how could she describe the murder when she was really at home crying at the time?’ to ‘If this is millions of years in the future how come the apes speak perfect 20th-century English?

“But you’ve paid your money by the time the refrigerator factor kicks in,” Greber goes on. “It’s too late for you. This will be that kind of movie.”

A moment’s pause, and then, out of the blue, “The husband, at the funeral, was amazingly well embalmed for someone who’d been shot in the face 700 times, don’t you think? Didn’t they do a nice job? Kudos to the funeral director.”

There are fridge-factor movies, I observe, and then there are films with a 10 minutes-later-while-drinking-iced-tea factor.

“I try, when I’m writing, to at least keep a sense of what is rational,” Greber says. “And admittedly, what I write is not so very believable either, with my amateur-sleuth English teacher who gets involved with murders and she can solve the murders that the police can’t solve? I ask readers to suspend disbelief from the Empire State building! But the stories, still, I hope, hinge together. The pieces of the puzzle fit.”

And the nasty old murders?

“Murder, I think, should always feel like a disruption of society,” Greber suggests. “It’s an outrage. We should think, ‘This is a terrible thing that has happened!’ I think that is there in my work. But in movies like this, it’s all so stylishly filmed that you never consider the consequences of this rather casually committed killing.”

“There’s a new kind of murderer, I think,” she adds. “Really creepy, stupid, murdering maiming. It repels me, and there’s a part of me that feels like I’m standing up as a true puritan. And I’m not for censorship, but … “

She lets it hang there in the air, that odious dilemma of those opposed to censoring art but who long for a society with less unsettling appetites. “I don’t know what to do about it,” she finally says. “As far as censorship is concerned, I’ve only done it personally, by saying, simply, ‘I don’t want to see that.’ I want certain things kept from out of my database. Ultimately, there are some pictures I just don’t want in my head.”

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1996 Metrosa, Inc.

1,000 Pieces of Gold

0

Solid Gold


BOB MARSHAK

O, Pioneers: Kenji Yamamoto and Nancy Kelly reinterpret the frontier.

Marin director offers a bold new take on the Western genre

By Zack Stentz

JOHN WAYNE. Henry Fonda. Clint Eastwood. Rosalind Chao. No, this isn’t a Sesame Street game of “Which one of these things is not like the other?,” because all of the aforementioned actors have given indelible performances onscreen as iconic figures of the Old West. But while the first three figures are well-known to audiences from such films as Stagecoach, The Ox-Bow Incident, and A Fistful of Dollars, you could be forgiven if Chao’s name draws a blank. She was in only one Western, the low-budget independent 1,000 Pieces of Gold, but her fierce performance as Lalu, a courageous Chinese immigrant struggling to escape indentured servitude on the frontier, is by itself enough to put Chao into the same pantheon as the other three.

It helps, too, that Chao’s starring vehicle is an absolutely first-rate, if iconoclastic, film. Together with The Ballad of Little Jo, McCabe and Mrs. Miller, and even Mario van Peebles’ Posse, 1991’s Gold falls into a category of films that collectively offer a boldly revisionist take on the traditional Western genre. Instead of wide-open spaces inhabited exclusively by fair-haired maids in gingham dresses bearing apple-cheeked children, Gold gives us a multicultural West of economic deprivation, harsh limitations on women, and simmering racism, ever ready to explode into violence, against Asians.

“One of Ted Turner’s channels is doing a series on the Western, and they’re interviewing Chris [Chris Cooper, co-star of the film], Rosalind, and me,” says Gold‘s director, Nancy Kelly, of this film due to screen at the Raven Theater on Oct. 4. “They’re putting us in the whole part of the show that talks about how Westerns have changed and become more multicultural.”

So why isn’t Lalu as famous as Shane or Rooster Cogburn, and why isn’t the beautiful and talented Chao (currently dealing with life, love, and Klingon battle-cruiser attacks as a recurring character on Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) a star of Eastwood-like proportions? Being an Asian woman in an entertainment industry that has a perpetual woody for white men and few others certainly has something to do with it, as does the fact that 1,000 Pieces of Gold was a fairly small film seen by more people in its numerous airings on public television than in theaters. “She’s getting a lot of work these days,” says Kelly of Chao, “but not nearly as much as she deserves. She’s a wonderful actress, and came to every day of shooting incredibly prepared.”

Though she’s far too modest to say it, Kelly could easily make the same statement about herself. Her film, based on Ruthanne Lum McCunn’s 1981 true-story book of the same name, is remarkably fluid and self-assured for a first feature. Far lesser efforts (has anyone actually sat through all of Straight out of Brooklyn?) have catapulted up-and-coming directors to prominence, yet Kelly is still toiling away in her modest office in San Rafael’s canal district on raising funds for a second feature. “It’s frustrating,” she admits. “I thought that having a track record would mean it would take less time to make the next film than the four years it took to make 1,000 Pieces of Gold, but it’s actually taking longer this time.

“But there’s really no way around the fundraising part. A film production is a big machine: equipment needs to be rented, actors need to be paid, people need to be fed.”

It also doesn’t help that public television’s American Playhouse series, a major benefactor of Gold, is no longer in a position to help. “All of the Republican attacks on public broadcasting have essentially meant the end of American Playhouse,” Kelly laments. “So we’re having to use entirely new fundraising sources.”

On the bright side, Kelly already has a loosely autobiographical script written, tentatively titled The Sweet Wide Open, and two bona-fide Hollywood stars–Edward James Olmos and Lorraine Bracco–attached to the project, which has helped raise interest and pre-sell rights in various foreign markets.

Also, 1,000 Pieces of Gold itself is finding new life on the repertory theater circuit, including the upcoming Raven screening, where Kelly is set to appear in person with her husband, Gold‘s editor/producer Kenji Yamamoto. “The rights recently reverted back to us from the distributor,” she says, “so we have nine prints that we’ve been screening at places like the Lark [Larkspur’s repertory theater]. We had a mutual friend who knew the Raven people, so we contacted them and they were very enthusiastic about screening the film and having us come up.”

Still, Kelly’s focus clearly remains on getting her next project started. And while returning to the wide-open but difficult-to-shoot-in spaces of the American West for her new film may make Kelly seem like a glutton for punishment, this distance runner and avid horsewoman (“I don’t smell like horses, do I?” she asks, having just returned from a morning ride shortly before the interview) isn’t one to shy away from a challenge. “All of the independent film workshops like to tell you all the rules you’re supposed to follow, like never shoot on water or make films with children or animals,” she says. “But you don’t think of those rules when you have a good story you want to tell.

“I wasn’t thinking about all of the costs and difficulties when I read the book [1,000 Pieces of Gold was based on]. All I was thinking was ‘This would make a great movie.'”

1,000 Pieces of Gold plays Friday-Thursday, Oct 4-10, at 7 p.m. at the Raven Theater. Following the first screening, director Nancy Kelly and producer/editor Kenji Yamamoto will speak with the audience. A pre-screening reception is planned at the Flying Goat Roastery from 6 p.m. Raven, 115 North St., Healdsburg. $6. 433-5448.

From the September 26-October 2, 1996 issue of the Sonoma Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1996 Metrosa, Inc.

Teen Court

0

Day in Court

By Bruce Robinson

IT WAS LIKE being a little kid,” confesses Jacob, although he clearly is anything but a kid. A lanky, mustachioed 17-year-old, Jacob is sitting in the witness chair in a courtroom adjacent to the Sonoma County Jail, recalling in a soft, halting voice the afternoon he and his girlfriend smashed the windows out of another girl’s car. The vandalism was meant to prove to his girlfriend that he was not two-timing her with the car’s owner.

“It was a stupid thing to do,” Jacob murmurs.

Listening intently from the nearby jury box, a disparate collection of a half-dozen other teens–mostly boys in wardrobes dominated by the color black–soberly weighs the evidence. At the end of the “trial,” it is up to them to decide what consequences Jacob should suffer for his ill-considered actions. Their eventual determination is the maximum penalty sought by the prosecutor, yet another teen conscientiously adopting a key role in this real-life courtroom drama: 25 hours of community service, restitution to the car owner, and four weeks of the same kind of jury duty they are discharging.

Welcome to Teen Court. For the past year and a half, this innovative merging of theatrical role-playing and the criminal-justice system has been quietly working to combat juvenile crime, offering a first-chance diversion from the court-jail-probation cycle, and compiling an impressive success rate.

A newly released evaluation report by SRA Associates of Sebastopol notes that the goal of the Teen Court program is to hold the recidivism rate for program participants to under 20 percent. For the period under study–January 1995 to June 1996–the actual figure for repeat offenders was just 9.2 percent.

“This is incredible,” exclaims Petaluma attorney Leroy Lounibus, who helped get the program established in Sonoma County. “The reason the rate is so low is because of the process. At every step of the way, they have to think about what they did.”

That crucial self-examination is done in the crucible of some fairly intensive peer pressure, from other teens who already have gone through the same process. It begins with an arrest and a real courtroom arraignment, after which defendants are referred to Teen Court by the Probation Department. But there is one other essential prerequisite.

“Unlike any other court of law, they have to admit their guilt,” explains Dyan Foster, executive director of Routes for Youth, the Santa Rosa non-profit that operates Teen Court. “The trial is for the jury to understand the circumstances and motivations in the case.”

All of the offenses referred to Teen Court are misdemeanors, most often involving crimes against property. Vandalism and trespassing account for more the half the cases. Less than 4 percent involve drug and alcohol offenses.

Among the defendants, three-quarters are there for their first arrest, while only 3 percent have two or more prior arrests. Two-thirds are male and the average age of all Teen Court participants is 14.

Since the program was initiated about four years ago, “over 850 cases have been referred to Teen Court, over 150 young people have been trained as attorneys, over $11,000 has been paid back to victims of misdemeanor crimes, and over 9,000 hours of community service have been served by Teen Court participants in local human service agencies,” reports Mark van Gorder, a member of the Routes for Youth board of directors.

“It’s a brand of juvenile court,” Lounibus elaborates. “The advocates for both the prosecution and the defense are teenagers; they present their case to a jury of teenagers. The only adult involved is the lawyer who presides over the court as a judge pro tem.”

Because it is a legally recognized alternative to juvenile court, the sentences dispensed by the peer juries are legally enforceable and often include paying restitution in addition to the community service.

Another of the consequences often included in a defendant’s sentence is a requirement that the teen write a letter of apology, one that not only is delivered to the victim of their offense, but also must be read aloud at a future session.

“The kids who are the prosecuting and defense attorneys and the kids who sit on the jury take it very seriously,” adds Bill Ferchland, a Santa Rosa lawyer who also has served as a Teen Court judge. “And that means that the defendants take it seriously.”

Just participating in the process forces defendants to reflect on and publicly explain the actions that brought them to this point in their life, regardless of whether or not they were part of a group or acted alone.

Lounibus says that the peer juries he has observed tend to take a hard line when considering sentences. “As a general rule, they’re pretty tough on the punishments. I’ve been surprised at how tough they’ve been.”

This is apparent as the jury deliberates Jacob’s fate, giving only passing consideration to the possibility of assigning him anything less than the maximum sought by the prosecution. When the consequences are announced by the jury foreman, Jacob accepts them stoically. As a result of the self-examination forced on him through his Teen Court experience, he has set new goals for himself and now has a job and aspires to become an electrician.

But first, he will take his turn as a Teen Court juror.

From the September 26-October 2, 1996 issue of the Sonoma Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1996 Metrosa, Inc.

Java Jive

0

Java Jive 2


Our annual writing contest pours out work that is hot, steamy, and not a little black


There is a voyeuristic quality to Java Jive that just can’t be beat. Springing from our frustration at not being able to squint well enough over the shoulders of fellow cafe denizens to ascertain just exactly what it is that they were scribbling about in journals, notebooks, envelope backs, and novel margins, Java Jive brings the miracle of knowledge into shining relief.

Last year, most of our entrants had a seemly interest in the nature of sex, making for perky reading. This year, there’s a lot of black-shirted angst and not as much sex as we sneakily anticipated.

But we continue bravely on, awarding the top three places to Guy Biederman, Nadine Van Vranken, and Robert Porter, who will receive gift certificates to Copperfield’s Books totaling $100, $75, and $50, respectively. We are pleased to have the other published entrants toddle off with fragrant pounds of Taylor Maid organic coffee. To all who entered, we bow low with thanks (forgiving even those who put off submitting work until we were brought, sniveling, to the lowly state of placing the headline “Win Big Prizes” on the come-on Java Jive ad).

Our only regret is that we don’t have the space to publish all of the good choices that we have come to agonize over. But we certainly can grudge the room to print the names of those writers whose work got argued over plenty during the winnowing process. And so extra thank-yous and honorable mention to Matthew Nyiri for his riff on gasoline coffee and the clean, sexy glory of Sundays coming home, to Barbara Stafford for her evocative “Still Life,” and to Desiree Hedberg for her strangely sweet “Bean in Love,” as well as Zoë Griffith-Jones (“The Evening Crowd”), and H. L. Seggel (“Counterspy”) for their “both sides now” glimpses of the cafe counter.

So pour yourselves a cuppa joe and find out just exactly what the hell your friends and cafe compatriots have been writing about all this time.

Cafe Therapy

“I’M A LIAR,” announces Leo with a shrug.

Gloria purses her lips. “Don’t sell yourself short, dear, you’re also a cheater, and a scum.”

They’re drinking refills of house coffee at Cafe Therapy. It’s crowded inside, standing room only.

“I’ll order mochas,” says Leo. “Looks like we’re in for a night of it.”

“Can I believe you? Can I believe anything you say after you fucked Marie?”

Leo pulls out a five from his Levi jacket. “You can believe that I loved you, once.”

“Yeah, right,” she says. “How could I forget . . . “

The day is growing dangerously remote. Leo’s thigh’s just an arm’s length away, but Gloria prefers to float just now.

Faint jazz mingles with the clack of backgammon and passionate chatter. The counter boy sweats, filling mugs from a steaming tap. Near the window a cropped woman speaks: “That’s the closest I’ve ever been to being insane.”

Gloria feels fearfully private, as if anything could happen and no one would notice.

A loud throaty laugh breaks everything up–a recklessly fat woman in slippers is beating a short man at gin. And Gloria thinks, what a disgrace, to do such a thing in public for everyone to see. And Leo puts his arm around her but she knows it’s for the wrong reason, that he thinks she’s crying over him.

But what does it matter:

Leo’s a liar, a cheater, and a scum.

–Guy Biederman

Pearl Slip

AN AGELESS Japanese woman enters. Under her unbuttoned overcoat a long, pearl colored slip loosely fits her pale nude form. She slides her feet across the linoleum in large-size men’s galoshes, courtesy of the Goodwill bin three doors down.

The college student behind the counter, with pomegranate hair and rows of earrings, does not look up. She’s already preparing her tea. She knows the Woman is lemon verbena. She doesn’t need to ask decaf or caffeinated, here or to go, room for cream. She knows all of that. She knows most Sundays at 10 a.m. the Woman will come. The boss knows too. He’s posted a note just below the counter to ensure that, next time the Woman tries to pay with ghost money, she’ll be asked to leave.

“You’ll be repaid later,” the Woman predicts.

The Student looks at her co-workers. They look away. She quickly rings, then shuts the register. At closing, she’ll empty the tip jar to make the balance even.

The Woman winks in conspiracy as she pours milk into her paper cup. Outside, clouds mix in the swelling river. Seagulls land on overturned tables, fanning their wings for imminent flight. The Woman stands among them sipping her tea as if from a porcelain cup. Through the rain-wet windows, the Student sees the edge of the Woman’s slip dip into gasoline puddles along the alleyway. The Woman walks as if she has begun a long journey across the hard interior of an abalone shell.

–Nadine Van Vranken

Untitled

“VEGAN? It says the muffins are vegan. What is vegan? Am I saying it right?” She pronounces it vee-juhn. She is not local. Locals are likely to call it anything, but don’t ask how.

Her companion is surely not local because he gives her a straight answer. “Vegan”–he calls it vee-gun–“means no eggs, milk, oil, sugar, baking powder, or salt. Good is bad.”

A local gives the correct answer. “Vegan is named for the star system Vega. The owner was once abducted by aliens, little gray guys, not foreigners, and the wisdom they imported was the recipe for Vegan muffins. Carbon life-forms cannot digest these muffins. You would not believe where the soup comes from.”

In the front door comes a woman with wild hair and so much metal in her hide, surely her Cuisinart exploded. But it’s the mosaic of tattoo we see even with her clothes on that causes speculation. Definitely Star Trek material. The out-of-towners decide bagels sound good.

The East West Cafe, the only coffeehouse in Sonoma County named for UFO vectors. Coffeehouses attract eccentrics like money attracts politicians or politicians attract flies. But the East West has gone pro. East West attracts aliens. Their disguises are almost convincing. None of that short bug-eyed gray stuff or the ostentatious green glob thing, and they almost always obey gravity. But after a second cup many begin to lose their sync pulses and their manner becomes erratic. Many witness this and assume they are seeing double. Which is like assuming you hear with an accent.

Sebastopol is home to Goddess Local 107 and New Age motorcyclists with crystals sprouting from copper brain-buckets. The neo-Atlantean theme of the East West harmonizes with this. But saffron walls and hip Egyptian murals don’t subdue caffeine’s zip. Ranting and raving, panting and waving. “Dennis Rodman will balance Perot’s ticket!” Sam the owner takes it all in stride. He’s from the Middle East: it takes more than pedants and tattooed women to blow his cool. He does give the tattooed lady a lingering glance. She is, after all, from way out there, way out there.

–Robert Porter

Caffeine Junk Dilemma No. 29

OCTOBER 17, 1989, San Francisco. After the quake.

Midnight at Polk and Eddy glass glitters like diamonds in the street, on the sidewalk, in the flashing lights of patrol cars. Its crunching under my feet breaks the eerie quiet. All I want is a hot cup of coffee, but power and gas are out everywhere.

Clocker on the corner asks for a light.

“Slow night?” I ask.

“Couldn’t drum up business with a marching band.” He shoots a quick eye around. “Too dark for the man to see, but too dark to see the man.”

“Too right,” a prostitute offers, passing.

Coffee’s the only unavailable commodity tonight.

Market and Van Ness I’m joined by a lean man with a long, slow gait, years of street life fixed in an intense gaze, sleeping bag over the shoulder, elbow pointed to the black sky.

“Feel that warm air?” he says, stopping. “There’s another one coming.”

We chance upon a trio at a bus stop, waiting.

“All things considered,” one says “I believe that the universe is not a malevolent place. We have nothing to worry about.”

My tall, wandering friend responds quietly, “I think the universe is full of fools. Take care. brother man.”

On Fillmore a band of moto-police ride a tight six, party lights flashing blue up the dark hill.

“Kinda scary, isn’t it?” one shouts.

It is. I never do find that cup of coffee.

3:32 a.m. Another large tremor.

Tonight everything’s shaking but me.

–Ramon Rivamonte

Untitled

IN THE MORNING he was caused to smile by the smell of coffee. I loved to make it for him: a meticulous process in order that every ingredient would be just right. I would make sure to grind the beans enough, but not too much, and be sure to put cream in.

It seemed to feed that heated glow of him. His skin was always warm to the touch. The darkness of him, as well, seemed to be colored by it: his skin tanned, his hair dark, his eyes brown. I liked to imagine that the coffee infiltrated him, giving a strong flavor and texture to his personality. Without this, he might just be another blonde-haired, blue-eyed boy I had passed time with.

I can’t help but think about him in coffee shops, reminded of the way his big flat hand held the cup. I look around at these people, milling, smiling, curious: a disco ball of faces and coffee beans and various ways to order a latte. People always want new things, to experience new ways of being. There is a strange simplicity in wanting something familiar and cherished, like the warmth of a cup of coffee, or the warmth of a lover.

–Nanci Haines

Coffee Bein’

MINE EYES have seen the glory . . . Heavenly smells, wishin’ wells . . . A cup a joe stares me in the face. Lucid milk-fed pools. Rippling steam engines explode under each breath. Wait a minute. What am I doing here? Oh yeah, wake up. Wake up and smell the coffee. Isn’t that how it goes, trying to get through the day good to the last drop and all that. Check her out, read this, what a bunch a crap. Self-indulgent witless wonders. And I’m one of ’em. Yeah, one of the Seven Witless Wonders of the Worlds, but hey, this is coffee-land. Land where half meets half and whole bean meets the steam and we make beautiful music together. Yeah, if it weren’t for my tin ear. Tin ear and a paper cup. And here’s to you, Mrs. Olsen, Jesus loves you more than you will ever know, now teach every housewife how to make a cup a joe. Woe woe woe. And Juan Valdez quietly handpicking only the richest coffee beans while his burro “Coca” was loaded down with burlap sacks filled with only the richest white powder and the gringo businessmen danced the Mexican hat dance all the way to the bank. Whoa, who stuck these Oliver Stone-esque flashbacks in here? Whew, pardon me, but my sense of reason seems to have been amputated this time of day. Gone under the knife. Cut out like a benign neck tumor on election eve. What? Would I like more decaf? Oh, foul, I cry.

Foul indeed.

–Ric Escalante

Untitled

THE ALMIGHTY had had a long, stressful day and was ready to park his carcass on his Hepplewhite and impersonate one of his finest spuds. He’d been crashing out in front of the tube more frequently these days. So what if he got every cable channel in the universe (including Bravo and Spice) and had the best HD reception in creation? He was finding it harder and harder to be stimulated. It was always a case of “been there, done that,” and somehow he knew that taking a vacation wouldn’t make a bit of difference.

Mrs. God had whipped up a very nice cheese strudel that afternoon, and was making fresh coffee. God had downed a raft of her rugallah that morning (he didn’t worry about putting on weight), and it was a fact that Mrs. God’s pastries were the best in the universe. Her coffee wasn’t bad either. and it was getting better all the time.

At exactly 7:11 a.m. PST, an 8.3 on the Richter epicentered in Santa Ana shook Southern California. God is a very loud snorer. It’s a good thing (though not everyone agrees about this) that he smelled Mrs. God’s coffee or the aftershocks would have leveled most of Orange County.

Rubbing his eyelids, the Big Fella sat down at his simulated maple grain formica table,and slurped the frothy whipped cream topping his java. Shoveling a Buick-sized slab of strudel into his mouth, he belched.

The people of Earth named it Cecilia, and it wiped out most of south Florida. The next morning a brilliant sun dazzled them, and they all agreed, “God’s in his Heaven. All’s right with the world!”

–Stephen Gross

he buys me kona

he buys me kona coffee

because I like it.

it’s not deep and existential

like French roast

it’s not nihilistic

like espresso beans

it’s not going to rouse you out of

bed with arias

like Italian roast

it won’t be distant–

alone in a corner

scribbling angry poetry

like Sumatra

it’s just kona . . .

which reminds me

of bare feet in the cool, wet sand

–Barbara Beatie

The Daily Grind

I stared into his coffee-colored eyes

they stained my soul with
intensity

Hot with emotions

Brain percolating with rich images

I timidly sipped, then gulped

And the scalding clarity of
his gaze

burned through me

Waking my morning-sluggish heart

with espresso insistence

Whipping my layers of bitterness
with creamy, sweet addiction

That floated on top of dark
liquid love

–Natalie Joyce

Cafe Death Dream

I wait.

Visions of drunken

Comrades of poetry

Leaping upon tables

Screaming poems of

War death sadness or

Wailing laments of

Love death sex dreams;

Shattered by empty

Carafes of house wine

Sitting alone in packed

Cafes of self-indulgent

Preneofascistdecadent

Punkrockhomosexual

Heroineyeddeviant

Poets in darkhole cafes;

Shooting caffeine

And whining about

Laughing mindless

Endless suburban

Uglyfathappywives

Whose children cover

Themselves in television;

Heroes who feed them

Dreams of freedom from

Bored suburban poets

Whimpering in dim cafes

Recycling leftover

Pathways well wandered

Down Kerouac roads

Of Zendeath dharma

Blackness.

I wait.

–Rick Harmon

Anonymous Fish Processor

She went into the room and killed everyone. Of course it wasn’t easy. Her parents put up the biggest fight. For the first time, they worked together to defeat her, but they failed. Would their other child miss them? Not likely, but who cares anyway. He should be killed, too.

After her killing spree she went out for a cup of coffee. Then, in a moment of celebratory release, she decided on a cappuccino. You couldn’t see the blood on her black clothes. It was no longer wet enough to rub off on people, but it did have a distinctive smell. She would have to change before midnight.

At midnight she would leave for Alaska. She was heading out to be an anonymous fish processor. The VW van was packed already. They said she would never do it. Well, they were dead. Too bad.

Outside in the moonless night, she sat alone at a tiny round table. She stuck her fingers through the foam into the hot espresso below. It didn’t hurt at all. The blood loosened from her fingernails and blended with the caffeine. Some drink.

–Chesley Springer

From the September 26-October 2, 1996 issue of the Sonoma Independent

This page was designed and created by the Boulevards team.
© 1996 Metrosa, Inc.

Fall Foods

Comfort FoodBy Gretchen GilesTHERE IS A SATISFYING SAVAGENESS about the fresh foods of summer. The ingredients are either sliced, peeled, grilled, frappéed, or actually torn into stuff for the plate and palate. One often sits around half-nude imbibing such nourishment out in the elemental heat of the waning twilight. And it is not unusual for summer foods to...

Talking Pictures

Bimbo PowerAndy SchwartzTerrible Troika: Goldie Hawn, left, Diane Keaton, and Bette Midler screech in 'The First Wives Club.' Tama Janowitz considers youth and beautyBy David TempletonWriter David Templeton takes people to interesting movies in an ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This time out, he teams up with Tama Janowitz, author of the '80s cult-hit novel Slaves...

Sherman Alexie

Seeing Red MARION ETTLINGERPortrait of the artist: Poet, author, and standup comic Sherman Alexie doesn't smile for the camera.Author Sherman Alexie is one angry young manBy Gretchen GilesTHERE'S A KILLER on the loose, a lone man with a honed blade and a particular predilection for removing the blue eyes and the hairlines from white heads. Terrorizing...

Diversity Symposium

Race MattersBy Paula HarrisSONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Professor Robert Coleman-Senghor, a 56-year-old African American with gray flecks in his dark hair, leans forward and gazes intently at the sun-struck campus garden, silently formulating his thoughts before speaking in his resonant voice. "People don't want to talk about race--they feel discomfort--but there's a need to talk, a need to look at...

Great Chefs of Sonoma

Haute StuffBy Zack StentzIF SUMMER--to loosely paraphrase Martha and the Vandellas--is when the time is right for dancing in the streets, then what the heck is autumn the appropriate season for? The Sonoma County Harvest Fair, of course! Now in its 22nd year of wine stomps, art shows, food-offs, and enough apples to inspire entirely new laws of motion...

Charlie Hunter

Shangomania!Photo by Jay BlakesbergColtrane meets Cobain: Charlie Hunter brings a post-punk sensibility to smooth '60s-style jazz grooves.Guitarist Charlie Hunter aims at flannel-clad jazz fansBy Greg CahillI THINK ALL MUSICIANS are on a mission, at least the real dedicated ones are on a journey," says jazzman Charlie Hunter, who sports onstage an eight-string guitar and a wry smirk that...

Talking Pictures

Fridge FactorBy David TempletonWriter David Templeton takes interesting people to interesting movies in his ongoing quest for the ultimate post-film conversation. This time out, he sits through the IQ-impaired thriller The Rich Man's Wife with award-winning mystery novelist Judith Greber."Don't be think badly of me if I cover my eyes during the scary parts," whispers mystery writer Judy Greber,...

1,000 Pieces of Gold

Solid GoldBOB MARSHAKO, Pioneers: Kenji Yamamoto and Nancy Kelly reinterpret the frontier.Marin director offers a bold new take on the Western genreBy Zack StentzJOHN WAYNE. Henry Fonda. Clint Eastwood. Rosalind Chao. No, this isn't a Sesame Street game of "Which one of these things is not like the other?," because all of the aforementioned actors have given indelible...

Teen Court

Day in CourtBy Bruce RobinsonIT WAS LIKE being a little kid," confesses Jacob, although he clearly is anything but a kid. A lanky, mustachioed 17-year-old, Jacob is sitting in the witness chair in a courtroom adjacent to the Sonoma County Jail, recalling in a soft, halting voice the afternoon he and his girlfriend smashed the windows out of another...

Java Jive

Java Jive 2Our annual writing contest pours out work that is hot, steamy, and not a little blackThere is a voyeuristic quality to Java Jive that just can't be beat. Springing from our frustration at not being able to squint well enough over the shoulders of fellow cafe denizens to ascertain just exactly what it is that they were...
11,084FansLike
4,606FollowersFollow
6,928FollowersFollow