.Campuses Brace for ‘Severe Consequences’ as CSU Budget Gap Looms

California State University is anticipating state spending cuts of nearly $400 million next summer and a delay in promised state support of more than $250 million. Sonoma State University is among the CSU campuses that will be affected. 

The projected budget gap may prevent the system from enrolling new students, offering employee raises and spending more money to boost graduation rates.

Cal State’s board of trustees heard system senior finance staff detail the grim fiscal outlook last week at a public meeting. They presented figures that show a 2025-26 budget hole of about $400 million to $800 million—a sizable chunk of Cal State’s estimated operating budget of $8.3 billion next year.

“I think we’ve got a lot of broken calculators in Sacramento,” said trustee Jack McGrory at the hearing. “We’re expected to increase enrollment, fulfill the needs of the labor market and continue to grow the economy, and at the same time, we’re facing these incredibly massive cuts.”

He added: “What happens to our 500,000 students with these incredibly massive cuts? … We’re talking layoffs. Everybody’s got to face up to that.”

McGrory and others stressed that the system has been in a state of fiscal distress for several years. Last year, the trustees indicated that Cal State spends $1.5 billion less than it should to adequately educate its students—a figure that predates the austerity measures that may be on the horizon.

The smaller, $400 million amount is the projected budget hole from mandatory new expenses and state cuts, minus new revenue from the tuition hikes the board approved last year. Those tuition increases—growing 6% annually from this year to at least 2028-29—aren’t enough to counteract the state cuts that lawmakers said they’d enact next year. The mandatory expenses include $60 million more for health insurance premiums for workers and $55 million in increased financial aid for students.

The proposed $400 million cut is equal to the money the system spends to educate 36,000 students. Cal State enrolled more than 450,000 students last fall.

“Cuts would particularly affect the most vulnerable students, limiting their access to academic support tools, advising, counseling and engagement programs,” the agenda document reads. Also at risk is the system’s efforts to improve graduation rates for Black students, a population Cal State has struggled to serve.

A trustees committee last week approved a budget request to Gov. Gavin Newsom that would largely avoid the projected deficit. In January, Newsom will debut his budget proposal for the next fiscal year. He and lawmakers will negotiate a final budget in June of next year.

That one-two punch of potential cuts and funding delays was spelled out in the budget deal that the Legislature and Newsom finalized this summer. It could have been worse: Initially, Newsom wanted to apply cuts to Cal State this budget year to address California’s multi-billion-dollar deficit. But lawmakers pushed back to buy the university another year to prepare for the cuts and possibly avoid them if the state’s revenue picture brightens. Steve Relyea, the top finance officer at Cal State, said system leaders should get credit for advocating for that reprieve.

Still, Cal State officials are setting a foreboding tone, warning of “severe consequences for students, staff and faculty across all CSU universities” that “could lead to larger class sizes, reduced course offerings, diminished student services, layoffs and hiring freezes,” the system’s 2025-26 budget proposal reads.

Some campuses have already laid off workers this year or plan to. Meghan O’Donnell, a lecturer at Cal State Monterey Bay and a senior officer in the systemwide faculty union, said that the jobs of hundreds of lecturers have been totally slashed or reduced because campuses are cutting the overall number of classes they offer.

Lecturer job cuts have occurred at the campuses of Chico, East Bay, Humboldt, Los Angeles, Monterey Bay, San Bernardino, San Francisco, and, of course, Sonoma. Lecturers have fewer job protections than faculty with tenure or who are on the tenure track.

The union expects to see formal system data about faculty job loss and work reductions in November. O’Donnell said Cal State Monterey Bay put its faculty on layoff notice last year. But the union was able to negotiate, and five faculty marked for layoffs instead got voluntary separation agreements. Meanwhile, in her academic department of humanities and communications, four tenured faculty at Monterey Bay took early retirement packages while three others quit and found university jobs outside the Cal State system. 

Meeting the state’s goals of enrolling a higher number of new students than past years is also at risk, officials said.

“Enrollment growth is very challenging at a time when you’re not getting the resources,” Relyea, the top finance officer at Cal State, said. “You can’t bring in additional students if you don’t bring in faculty to teach the students”

Already the system is working to close an operating deficit of $218 million this academic year—even after new revenue this year from the tuition hikes and some extra state support. It’s a repeat of last year’s situation of ever-higher revenues but even higher expenses. And like last academic year, campuses are coping by pulling from reserves, not filling vacancies and combining under-enrolled classes or outright cutting them.

Several trustees also noted that the system doesn’t adequately sell its story to lawmakers and the public about the impact the reductions have had on the system. “We’ve almost been too effective at making these cuts year over year over year,” said Diego Arambula, vice chair of the board.

“A hiring freeze is a hiring freeze, and that does impact students if we’re not bringing someone into a role that we know is important,” he said. “It’s impacting our staff, who are taking on more to try and still meet the needs of the students who are here.”

1 COMMENT

  1. Around the nation, the population is losing faith in higher education, in both blue and red states. There are many reasons for that, political, social and technical.
    The article describes several trustees as wanting to sell the public more on how difficult the cuts are for the CalState system. It’s possible that even more important is regaining the trust and confidence of the public that what they are offering is in practice well worthwhile to the society (not just in abstractions and platitudes, but in real terms). Why should a landscaper or cashier subsidize a college student to take XYZ studies? Is that kind of education creating a richer society (in various terms) for the regular people paying the taxes?

    That’s the story they need to tell. And the more non-political that story can be, the broader the potential support (rather than trying to appeal to only to the sentiments of one side of the spectrum, but alienating another portion of the taxpaying and voting populace).

    • Please sign me up for the newsletter - No

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_img
North Bay Bohemian E-edition North Bay Bohemian E-edition